Rule 03 Certification Procedure en 44
Rule 03 Certification Procedure en 44
CERTIFICATION PROCEDURE
1) MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS
2) PRUDUCTS, PROCESSES AND SERVICES
(Rule-03)
Contents
Certification body LL-C (Certification) Czech Republic a.s. (“LL-C”) provides certification
services against national standards on various Management Systems like Quality
Management Systems as per ISO 9001:2015, ISO 9001 in connection with NV 333/2011
Environmental Management Systems as per ISO 14001:2015, Occupational Health &
Safety Management Systems as per ISO 45001, Information Security Management
Systems as per ISO/IEC 27001, in management of Critical Control Points in the Food
Industry with requirements of Food Safety Management Systems as per ISO 22000 and
FSSC 22000 scheme) with the requirements of the HACCP and the and IT Service
Management Systems as per ISO 20000-1, both in production and services companies In
Energy Management (ISO 50001) and furthermore, under the accreditation of ANSI /
ANAB (U.S.A.) Certification according to ISO 9001, ISO 22301 and ISO 28000 standards.
The legal status of the organization is a joint-stock company registered under file number
B 22724 kept at the Municipal Court in Prague. The company was established as a
subsidiary in the Czech Republic to its service closer to the needs of local candidates on
the certification and understand the conditions and needs of the parties that the results
of certification activities using or relying on them. The company is registered with the
Municipal Court in Prague. The company operates in the EU and beyond.
Certification services are available to all candidates who adopt the rules laid down in this
Directive and demand for the certification.
Objectives
The present Rule defines:
Scope
This instruction applies to Certification of Management Systems of organizations active in
the production, services in non-state or government sector in the areas of scope of
accreditation according to LL-C.
Used abbreviations:
CB – Certification Body
CBP – CB for Product Certification
HCB – Head of CB
DHCB – Deputy Head of CB
QM – Quality Manager
E – Evaluator which provides Assessment of Conformity
LE – Lead Evaluator
DM – Decision Maker on Certification
TE – Technical Expert
SJ-PK system
For certification, the quality system in the field of roads (SJ-PK) in order to increase the
quality of work in construction, repair and maintenance of roads is regulated by the
Ministry of Transport, which develops and complements SJ-PK for quality development
and requirements for SJ-PK and technical conditions defining the requirements for
ensuring the quality of supplies, services or documents to a minimum level by the criteria
for the technical qualification of the tenderer for the supply, service or works contract.
The certification process is applied in accordance with the system standards ČSN EN ISO,
legal regulations. SJ -PK applies to works and activities at PK listed in individual parts of
MP for areas according to Article 3 of SJPK.
Energy management
This system analyses energy sources, basal consumption and plans to influence it in
terms of savings in both the application of organizational and technological measures.
The benefit of certification, which in some jurisdictions is also compliance with legislation,
should also be energy savings. The criterion standard is ISO 50001.
Machinery Devices
For the certification of machinery devices means to provide the assessment of conformity
procedure EC type-examination whereby CB ascertains and certifies that a representative
sample of machinery devices fulfils the requirements of Directive 2006/42/EC, or by full
RULE 03, Revision 44, Page 6 (total 33)
LL-C (Certification) Czech Republic a.s., Pobřežní 620/3, Praha 8 - Karlín 186 00
M.C., section B, inset 22724, IC 27118339
LL-C (Certification)®
quality assurance system whereby the manufacturer who fulfils the obligations imposed
ensures and declares that the products concerned meet the provisions of the Directive.
The CB provides the certification of factory production control (FPC), which is based on
an initial inspection of factory and of factory production control and continuous
surveillance assessment and approval of factory production control (FPC).
Furthermore, it is possible to use the evaluation system described in detail in Rule 15.7
for MDD-SW, but the evaluation / assessment of the quality system according to ISO
13485 and according to the requirements of the National Council or according to the EN
62304 standard as amended must not be neglected.
Toys
Assessment of conformity of Toys means to provide EC Declaration of Conformity by
procedure EC type-examination whereby CB ascertain and certifies that a representative
sample of Toys fulfils the requirements of Directive 2009/48/EC, Regulation of
Government No. 86/2011.
e-IDAS
The requirements for trust service providers (TSPs) in presenting compliance with the
requirements necessary to obtain qualified status are regulated by the following
documents: REGULATION (EU) No. 910/2014 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF
THE COUNCIL, Act 298/2016 Coll., Act 297/2016 Coll., Standard ČSN ETSI EN 319 403
V2.2.2.
CLIENT INQUIRY
TELEPHONE
E-MAIL
INQUIRY DETAILS
APPLICATION
REGISTRATION
CERTIFICATION STANDARDS
INTEGRATION
APPLICATION OTHER NORMATIVE DOCS.
EVALUATION
OFFER/AGREEMENT (F31)
BUSINESS CONDITIONS (F32)
ASSESSMENT APPOINTMENT OF AUDITORS
SCOPE DEFINITION
Evaluation failed (F40) AUDIT PLAN (F41)
due to incorrect
audit/assessment
plan
STAGE 1 AUDIT -
OFF SITE /ON SITE STAGE I QUESTIONNAIRE
(F42 I.)
STAGE 2 AUDIT -
ON SITE NONCONFORMITY REPORTS
(F46)
Unsuccessful AUDIT RECORD (F44)
evaluation AUDIT OUTCOME AUDIT REPORT (F43)
NON- EVALUA EVALUATION
CONFORMI TOR QUESTIONNAIRE (F42 I+II.)
NG
COMPILATION OF
Successful FINAL DOCUMENTS
AUDIT REPORT (F 43)
evaluation
CERTIFICATE (F 49)
Each audit stage of the procedure during the period of validity of the certification contract
are:
- the two stages initial audit and evaluation (certification audit)
- surveillance audits in the second and third year
- recertification audit (the audit re-assessment) at the end period of validity of the
certificate to maintain a valid certification
Based on inquiry, data from the questionnaire and the current Tariff LL-C issues F31
Offer of management systems certification in written form and sends it to the address of
the applicant. Business Conditions - F32 are the integral and mandatory annex of every
offer.
Client who accepts any Offer for certification has to confirm the F31 and Business
Conditions (F32). The signature of an authorized person for the applicant the offer is
submitted and confirmed, as well as the signing and confirming of the attached Business
Conditions makes full agreement/contract for the management system certification. The
contract is generally governed by the provisions of the Commercial Code § 591 to the
600th in Czech Republic and accreditation criteria. Furthermore, this is provided
information confirmation as well.
In particular cases, client might rise a special request for back-to-back audit due to
special circumstances. Those circumstance (e.g. long-distance travels, problematic
In case, exception for back-to-back audit was not given, the 1st and 2nd stage are
separated (no possibility of back to back audit).
If a client has any other requests, such requests shall be discussed with a responsible
persona from LL-C(Certification) and held accordingly.
Auditors
Head of CB LL-C appoints the lead auditor, auditors, members of an audit team, technical
expert and an evaluator of audit. They must be complied with the general qualification of
auditors, including their competence and experience, reflecting the activity of the
applicant and eventually any specific processes (e.g. welding), impartiality and
independence. Appointment of auditor must be notified to the applicant in advance.
Client’s documentation
The client’s documentation must reasonably define the organizational structure of the
applicant and a precise description of its activities. Above the management system
manual documentation may also include activity procedures and work instructions.
Documentation must take into account both direct and indirect requirements based on
the standards and client’s activities.
Audit documentation
Lead Auditor shall examine the documentation presented regarding completeness and
requirements of the standard. In case of nonconformities or in case of FSSC scheme Area
of Concer the applicant will receive a Report of Nonconformity and findings (F46) and
must take corrective action and specify the date for their compliance. These
nonconformities have to be removed before the Stage II of certification audit. Irrelevant
anomalies may be clarified in during the audit. In FSSC scheme Area of Concern is
clarified during 2nd stage of audit and must be closed or defined as NCRs. Documentation
audit carried out by lead auditor is provided outside of the client’s location.
Documentation audit is carried out as part of the certification audit (Stage 1). The new
revisions of the documentation are reviewed during surveillance, if necessary.
1st stage of audit is an obligatory part and is carried out as part of the initial certification
audit (1st stage). 1st stage of audit is performed to determine the preparedness of the
client’s location and status and the main conditions for the 2 nd stage of audit. In FSSC
22000 scheme the time between audit stage 1 and audit stage 2 must not be longer than
6 months. 1st stage of audit will be repeated if longer interval will be needed.
The results from the 1st level of audits are presented in the form of the Protocol on
Nonconformities - F46 and on specific forms.
In some circumstances, the 1st level, especially for the ISO 9001 standard, can be
performed outside the applicant's company using questionnaires and telecommunication
technologies. CAAT RAP.
RULE 03, Revision 44, Page 10 (total 33)
LL-C (Certification) Czech Republic a.s., Pobřežní 620/3, Praha 8 - Karlín 186 00
M.C., section B, inset 22724, IC 27118339
LL-C (Certification)®
1st stage has to start with Opening meeting, which is followed by a site tour to
investigate the following objectives:
a) The client´s management system documentation was reviewed, to sufficiently support
the transparency of the client´s management system;
b) Specific workplaces, site conditions and client´s personnel view about readiness for
the 2nd stage must be checked;
c) Client status and particulars with respect to the identification of the MS key
performance or significant aspects, processes, objectives and operations must be
reviewed;
d) The scope of the MS management system is to be confirmed by
- client´s site
- processes and equipment
- levels of controls (especially of multisite clients)
- statutory and regulatory requirements;
e) Review of allocation of resources for 2nd stage and discussion with client details for 2 nd
stage;
f) Information obtained were found sufficient for the statement that the system is in
compliance with context of the standard - the plan of the 2nd stage with / without any
alterations may be performed or not.
Results from 1st stage of audit are documented 1st stage report F 42.1 and on F46 Report
of Nonconformities and other forms.
In case, exception for back-to-back audit was given, all parts of 1st stage of audit were
done and results of 1st stage of audit were sufficient, the 2nd stage of audit can be carried
out.
In some circumstances 1st stage of audit (particularly in standard ISO 9001) can be
provided off-site of the applicant location using questionnaires and telecommunications
technology. (RAP – remote auditing procedures).
CAAT-RAT / ICT method (methods of remote assessment and their approaches not
only in times of pandemic crisis COVID 19). In case of FSSC 22000, FSSC 22000 Quality
and GMP+ FSA certification schemes the remote assessment using ICT method will be
organized according actual scheme owner directives in all phases of audit (initial or
certification-Ist and IInd stage, surveillance and recertification audit).
AUDIT ON SITE
Opening meeting
This is the auditor interview with the management of the applicant and with his
responsible for management systems.
The opening meeting goal is:
- Reaching a consensus in meters of plan, content and procedures of certification of
CB and applicant
- Consultation of audit results (Stage 1)
- Determining the manner of communication between auditors and management
- Verifying whether the extent of the audit shall provide the auditors sufficient
results for assessing
- A declaration of confidentiality and impartiality of auditing team
If the company has multiple functions in more than one location, the auditor must be
aware of the company's headquarters and OFF-site activities.
Based on findings review the applicant is informed if an additional audit will be needed to
verify effectiveness of the action taken before granting the certificate.
In case that the evaluator/decision maker decides that the audit results do not allow the
CB to grant the certificate or maintain the valid certificate the decision is notified to the
applicant, including the reasons for the decision.
The applicant may appeal to the Head of the CB and ask to the change the decision
taken.
Certification contract
A certification agreement must be concluded between the certification body and the
organization applying for certification with a detailed description of the scope of the
certificate and a reference to all relevant system requirements. This agreement must
contain details or references to agreements between the CB and the organization, which
include, but are not limited to:
1) Ownership of the certificate and the content of the audit report will be held by the CB;
2) Conditions under which the certification contract can be terminated;
3) The conditions under which the certificate may be used by a certified organization;
4) Conditions of confidentiality in relation to information collected by the CB during the
certification process;
5) The certified organization allows the CB to share information regarding the
certification and audit process with the FSSC Foundation or Scheme Owner, the GFSI or
government agencies, if required;
6) Non-compliance management procedures;
7) Complaints and appeals procedures;
The contract of certification of management systems, which manages the rights and
obligations of applicant and CB is concluded confirming the F31 Offer of Management
Systems Certification and F32 Business Conditions by the applicant. The applicant must
confirm the both before starting the audit (Stage 1). For granting a certificate the
contract is mandatory.
Certification
Ones all criteria have been met the LL-C grants certification in the form of a certificate,
the applicant gets official certificates (2 original sets in the national language of the
applicant and 2 originals in English). For additional copies and for foreign language
versions may be charged additional fee. The certification is valid for duration of not more
than 3 years from the date of approval and is subject to the agreed Business Terms and
to requirement of monitoring the fulfilment of requirements of relative standard
(standards).
In case of private certification schemes the use of logo will be according their own
documents (GMP+ document A3, FSSC 22000 document Part IV, etc.)
The LL-C approved logo shall not be used on a product or product packaging seen by the
consumer or in any other way that may be interpreted as denoting product conformity.
Certified subject must comply with the terms, including the use of logos and marks
referring to the certification on promotional items.
If the surveillance audit findings show that the client’s management system doesn’t fulfil
the requirement of the standard the client gets the possibility to make corrective actions
in determinate date. LL-C verifies and decides if the corrective actions are sufficient for
maintenance of certification.
Before the end of its validity, and if the client wishes to continue with the certified
management system with the LL-C, LL-C recertification/renewal audit must be
conducted. Renewal (or recertification) audits are planned in the third year and
conducted to evaluate and confirm the continued conformity and effectiveness of the
management system as a whole, and its continued relevance and applicability for the
scope of certification so that the new certificate could be granted before the end of
validity of the old one.
The procedures and guidelines are consistent with those for initial audit. Any changes in
client’s organization (e.g. change in number of sites), activities or documentation must
be supplied at least 14 days before starting audit.
POPTÁVKA
ZÁKAZNÍKA
TELEFON
EMAIL
UPŘESNĚNÍ
POPTÁVKY
FORMULÁŘ ŽÁDOSTI (F30)
REGISTRACE
ŽÁDOSTI
CERTIFIKAČNÍ STANDARDY
POSOUZENÍ
INTEGRACE
ŽÁDOSTI
NABÍDKA/SMLOUVA (F31) DALŠÍ NORMATIVNÍ DOK.
OBCHODNÍ PODMÍNKY (F32)
URČENÍ ROZSAHU JMENOVÁNÍ AUDITORÚ (F40)
POSUZOVÁNÍ
Neúspěšné
hodnocení
z důvodu PLÁN AUDITU (F41)
chybného plánu
auditu
2. ST. AUDITU - NA
MÍSTĚ
PROTOKOLY O NESHODÁCH
Neúspěšné (F46)
hodnocení HODNOCENÍ ZÁZNAM Z AUDITU (F44)
NEVYHOVĚLY HODNO VÁSLEDKU AUDITU
-TITEL ZPRÁVA Z AUDITU ( F43 )
AUDITU
DOTAZNÍK (F42 I+II.)
VYPRACOVÁNÍ
Hodnocení úspěšné ZÁVĚREČNÝCH
DOKUMENTŮ ZPRÁVA Z AUDUITU (F 43)
CERTIFIKÁT (F 49)
OZNÁMENÍ O PŘIPOMÍNKY A
NEVYSTAVENÍ CERTIFIKÁTU AKCEPTACE AKCEPTACE
ZÁKAZNÍKA ZÁKAZNÍKEM
(F 48 V) f
POPTÁVKA ŽÁDOST
ZÁKAZNÍKA ZÁKAZNÍKA
TELEFON f
EMAIL FORMULÁŘ
TECHNICKÝ REGISTRACE
EXPERT ŽÁDOSTI
PŘEZKOUMÁNÍ
ŽÁDOSTI
NAŘÍZENÍ VLÁDY
ZKOUŠKY NEVYHOVĚLY HARMONIZOVANÉ NORMY
Z DŮVODŮ NEVHODNÉHO
PLÁNU HODNOCENÍ URČENÍ ROZSAHU SEZNAM SUBDODAVATELŮ
HODNOCENÍ
PLÁN HODNOCENÍ F41 V
VLASTNÍ ZAŘÍZENÍ NE
PROVEDENÍ PROVEDENÍ
ZKOUŠEK ZKOUŠEK
(VÝPOČTŮ) (VÝPOČTŮ)
PROTOKOL Z HODNO-
CENÍ/ZKOUŠKY (F 42 V)
ZKOUŠKY
NEVYHOVĚLY HODNOCENÍ ZÁZNAM Z POSUZOVÁNÍ( F44)
OP VÝSLEDKŮ
ZKOUŠEK
OZNÁMENÍ O PŘIPOMÍNKY A
NEVYSTAVENÍ CERTIFIKÁTU AKCEPTACE AKCEPTACE
ZÁKAZNÍKA ZÁKAZNÍKEM
(F 48 V) f
*The certification process diagram does not apply to medical devices certification
process, which is described separately in Rule 15.11 document.
Each stage of the procedure during the period of validity of the certification contract are:
- initial evaluation, review and decision on certification by DM (Decision maker)
- surveillance if requested by certification scheme
- renewal of certification (recertification/renewal evaluation) in the end of period of
certification validity
The documentation at the stage of application for certification must adequately define the
organizational structure (including geographical locations and local activities) of the
applicant and a description of its activities, which are essential for certification, for which
application has been made. Documentation may include, in addition to the manual the
procedures and work instructions. Documentation must take into account both direct and
indirect requirements based on standards used and the subject matter.
Coordinator reviews the documentation to ensure that the product is in the scope of LL-C
accreditation and if the CB has the competence and capability to perform the certification
activity. With the positive conclusion based on inquiry, data from the questionnaire and
the current Tariff, LL-C issues F31 Offer of Product Certification in written form and sends
it to the address of the applicant. Business Conditions - F32V are the integral and
mandatory annex of every offer.
Client who accepts an offer for certification has to confirm the F31 and Business
Conditions F32V. The signature of an authorized person for the applicant the offer is
submitted and confirmed, as well as the signing and confirming of the attached Business
Conditions makes full agreement/contract for the Product Certification. The contract is
generally governed by the provisions of the Civil Code Nr. 89/2012 Sb. § 2652 až § 2661
in Czech Republic and accreditation criteria. Furthermore, this is provided information
confirmation as well.
Evaluators
Coordinator of CB LL-C appoints the Lead evaluator and members of an evaluation team,
technical experts and DM – decision maker which is responsible for review and decision
related to certification. They must be complied with the general qualification of
evaluators, including their competence and experience, reflecting the specific product in
question, impartiality and independence. Appointment of Lead evaluator must be notified
to the applicant in advance.
Evaluation activities
Evaluation activities consist in the conformity assessment of requirements covered by the
scope of certification and other requirements of certification scheme.
For a major non-conformity, the organization shall submit the cause analysis, correction,
and the plan for corrective action within 30 days from the date the nonconformity is
issued, including evidence of implementation, within 60 days from the date of the non-
conformity, unless the auditor and the organization agree on a longer period of time.
For evaluation, the evaluators use a questionnaire to assess compliance with the relevant
standards, regulations and government directives and documentation of the applicant.
Lead Evaluator shall communicate a preliminary report on the results after the
evaluation. Evaluating team is not authorized to release the final conclusion of
certification. The Evaluation Report containing the result of audit and other important
information, the applicant will receive within 14 work/days. The applicant may comment
on it in following 14 days. If findings (non-conformities, deviations) are found, the
applicant must propose appropriate corrective actions and the date of their compliance;
the date depends on the specific findings.
Criteria for assessment and review the results related to evaluation are as follows:
- Test records, questionnaire
- Calculation record and reports (if requested by the scheme)
- Evaluation Report F43V
- Verification of compliance with the LL-C Rules
- Submission and completeness of evaluation results in the documentation (report,
questionnaire, reports of nonconformities)
- Corrective actions on findings during the evaluation
Based on findings review the applicant is informed if additional tests will be needed to
verify effectiveness of the corrective action taken before granting the certificate. The DM
reviews the results of additional evaluation.
In case that the DM decides that the evaluation results do not allow the CB to grant the
certificate or maintain the valid certificate the decision is notified to the applicant,
including the reasons for the decision.
The applicant may appeal to the Head of the CB and ask to the change the decision
taken.
Certification issue
Ones all criteria have been met the LL-C grants certification in the form of a certificate,
the applicant gets official certificates (2 original sets in the national language of the
applicant and 2 originals in English). For additional copies and for foreign language
RULE 03, Revision 44, Page 21 (total 33)
LL-C (Certification) Czech Republic a.s., Pobřežní 620/3, Praha 8 - Karlín 186 00
M.C., section B, inset 22724, IC 27118339
LL-C (Certification)®
versions may be charged additional fee. The certification is valid for duration of not more
than 5 years from the date of approval and is subject to the agreed Business Terms and
to requirement of monitoring the fulfilment of requirements of relative standard
(standards).
Use of LL-C logos ad marks and private schemes (FSSC, GMP+ FSA, IFS)
Use of the LL-C logos and marks and private schemes (FSSC, GMP+ FSA, IFS) is
regulated under the terms of Business Conditions - F32. Certified subject must comply
with the terms, including the use of logos and marks referring to the certification on
promotional items. Use of private schemes logo is guided by its documentation and
requirements (GMP+ A3 GMP+ Logo´s and/or Trademarks, FSSC 22000 etc.)
Each surveillance for the relevant management system standard shall include:
a) Internal audits and management review;
b) A review of actions taken on nonconformities identified during the previous audit;
c) Complaints handling;
d) Effectiveness of the management system with regard to achieving the certified
client´s objectives and the intended results of the respective management system
(s);
e) Progress of planned activities aimed at continual improvement;
f) Continuing operational control;
g) Review of any changes;
h) Use of marks and/or any other reference to certification.
If the surveillance findings show that the manufacturer doesn’t fulfils the obligations
imposed by the approved quality system then he gets the possibility to make corrective
actions in determinate date. LL-C verifies and decides if the corrective actions are
sufficient for maintenance of certification.
Note: For ANAB accredited standards it is unlikely that a surveillance audit duration will
be is less than 1 audit day.
Remote assessment methods using ICT may include the following approaches:
The aim is to provide a sufficiently flexible and non-prescriptive methodology to meet the
needs of industry by allowing client organizations to use CAAT-RAT to improve the
traditional audit process.
The audit can be performed remotely, when the responsible person is not present and is
abroad, for example. The interview is then conducted with the help of Skype, Viber,
WhatsApp, and other ICT tools, where the applicant sends electronic versions of the
required documents to the auditor or assessor and he evaluates them outside the
The ICT/CAAT method must be agreed in before any part of the audit (part of Auditor
Appointment) starts; IAF MD 3 – current version. Audit is then conducted in according
with requirements of IAF MD 4 (current version).
IF any ICT technology used for CAAT-RAT or remote audit date, time have to be
mentioned, also specification of technology used (which one).
Renewal of certification
Before the end of its validity, and if the client wishes to continue with the certified
product by LL-C, LL-C renewal evaluation must be conducted.
Planning must take into account the time needed to evaluation and decision so that the
new certificate could be issued before the expiration of the old one.
The manufacturer must inform the CB any plan for substantial changes to the quality
system verify whether after these changes the quality system still meets the
requirements and this at least 14 days before starting renewal evaluation.
GMP + FSA scheme certification procedures are governed by the RULE 15_48 procedure.
The suspension shall be communicated to the client by the registered letter/certified mail
and published on the website of the CB. The holder may appeal within 30 days to the
Head of the CB. The suspension of LL-C ends immediately if the applicant demonstrates
needed actions within a specified period.
Termination/withdrawal of certification
If the client, despite instructions from LL-C fails to fulfil its obligations of the contract, for
example, will not take corrective action or fails to comply with the above-mentioned
shortcomings, LL-C immediately terminates the validity of the certificate. This notifies to
the client; requires the return of original certificates by registered mail and publics that
information. Other reasons for termination may be, for example:
RULE 03, Revision 44, Page 24 (total 33)
LL-C (Certification) Czech Republic a.s., Pobřežní 620/3, Praha 8 - Karlín 186 00
M.C., section B, inset 22724, IC 27118339
LL-C (Certification)®
- surveillance audit shows that the essential requirements for the system are not
met
- client’s request for termination
- the client does not produce products related to the certification (change of
technical parameters, doesn’t’ fulfil the requirements)
- the client fails to meet financial obligations to LL-C
- another violation of Business Condition F32 from the client.
Only certificates issued within the scope of accreditation by the signatories MLA – EA,
IAF, PAC, IAA may be considered for transfer if the respective certificate shall have been
issued by a body that shall have been accredited by an accreditation body that is the
signatory only of a regional MLA, then such transfer shall be limited only to certification
bodies accredited by bodies involved in said regional agreement. Organizations that are
holders of certificated that are not covered by such accreditation shall be treated as new
clients.
If a query regarding the transfer of certification shall have been received, the certification
coordinator shall appoint an audit coordinator with qualification for the respective area
and prepare and register a transition plan which includes communication with the issuing
body, and assessment of the documentation for the transfer via the transfer report.
Regarding the communication with the issuing body, the certification coordinator shall
contact the issuing body via IW in order to request documentation and confirm the
validity of the certificate and other critical matters relevant to the procedure. Among the
documentation that shall be requested is the following:
- Audit plan.
- Audit reports.
- Checklists.
- Non-conformities and/or other audit findings.
- Corrections, root cause analysis, and corrective action plan to non-conformities.
- Audit program.
- Certificates.
The date and e-mail of the communication to the issuing body are registered in IW. The
certification coordinator shall upload evidence of the communication (screenshot or file)
with the issuing body and upload the provided documents on IW.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, LL-C (Certification) will continue the transfer according to
the customer’s requirements if no answer is received within three audit working days
since the dispatch of the communication using the documentation provided by the client’s
organization. In this regard, if such a situation occurs, the certification coordinator will
send an e-mail via IW to the accreditation body of the issuing body letting it know the
situation. The date and e-mail of the communication to the accreditation body are
Regarding the assessment of the documentation of the transfer, the examination carried
out by the audit coordinator shall cover the following aspects and its conclusions shall be
documented in the transfer report:
- confirmation that the certified activities of the client fall within the scope of
accreditation of LL-C (Certification) Czech Republic a.s.;
- reasons for requesting the transfer;
- whether the workplaces that is requesting the transfer of certification are owners of
an accredited certificate that is in force as regards authenticity, term of validity and
the scope of activities covered by the management system certificate.
- evaluation of the latest reports from a certification or re-certification audit, reports
from follow-up supervision and all significant non-conformities which shall have been
discovered within said audits or supervisory visits. This evaluation shall also include
all and any further documentation that shall be available and concern the certification
process, i.e. hand-written notes, checklists etc. If no reports from the last certification
or re-certification audit shall be available, or if the follow-up supervisory audit shall
be postponed, the organization shall be regarded as a new client;
- received complaints and measures taken;
- state within the current certification cycle;
- all and any existing liabilities of the organization in relation to regulatory bodies as
regards compliance with laws.
Certification, which shall be known to have been suspended or to be at the risk of being
suspended, shall not be accepted for transfer. If the receiving certification body shall be
unable to verify the state of certification with the issuing certification body, LL-C
(Certification) will continue the transfer according to the customer’s requirements with
the documentation provided by the organization.
If the decision shall have been made to take over a certificate, an offer of supervision
over the maintenance of the system shall be sent simultaneously, and after this offer
shall have been confirmed, a certificate shall be issued.
Confidentiality
LL-C considers all information and documentation of the certificate holder or applicant to
be confidential.
The evaluator / assessor, technical expert, unless is the permanent employee of CB, in
assessing under the conditions specified in the Agreement on cooperation that contains
provisions covering ensuring confidentiality and avoidance of conflicts of interest in
accordance with Rule05 – Act and Behaviour of CB personnel.
Appointments of evaluators are proposed to the client for approval. The applicant has the
option to refuse individual evaluators. However, it must explain his motivation that the
head of LL-C consider and adopt final decision. In case of customer’s complaints, the
Head of LL-C act according to the internal Quality Manual Rule 01 (below mentioned).
External TE and evaluators are also bound by confidentiality under contract with LL-C.
Records
LL-C certification retains all records, documents and reports for a period of 3 years after
the end of their validity for management systems certification. For product certification
retains records, complete documentation and evaluation reports as required by related
standard or Directive.
For the purposes of authorities of surveillance on market (in CR ČOI) and on medical
devices (in CR SÚKL) must have retained complete documentation, which was part of a
conformity assessment of MDD. This documentation of the manufacturer or his
authorized representative shall keep for at least 5 years (in the case of implantable MDD
for 15 years) from the date of manufacture of the last product.
SJ-PK - in case of issuing a certificate for SJPK in accordance with the requirements of
LL-C Certification a.s. on behalf of the (coordinator), informs the Ministry of Transport
of all discrepancies and breaches of certification within fifteen days of the issuance of the
certificate, or of the last supervisory audit and other activities.
Certification Publications
LL-C at regular intervals, publish a certificate holder on the websites www.ll-c.info on the
basis of the client’s Tax Identification Code. In the case of suspension and withdrawal of
certificate is this information published immediately.
In private certification schemes (FSSC 22000, including FSSC 22000 Quality, GMP +),
information about clients and certification dates, etc., are uploaded to its IS of the
scheme owner within 14 days after each event.
If contact with the organization cannot be made, CB will have to follow its internal policy
and take appropriate steps (section VI. Suspension or withdrawal of certificate).
B) Certification of products
The manufacturer must affix the CE marking in accordance with Directive and draw up a
written declaration of conformity.
The holder/manufacturer of certificate of machinery device must constantly ensure that
the machinery meets the corresponding state of the art.
The certificate holder of the construction product must consistently ensure that the
referred construction product corresponds to the production technical parameters
specified on the certificate and in the report. In the event of changes in production
processes or other essential technical parameters of the construction product, the
certificate holder is obliged not to include the changed construction product with the
existing certificate. The certificate holder is required to notify any changes to the
certification body.
The certificate holder shall undertake to fulfil the obligations arising from the quality
system as approved and to ensure that it remains appropriate and effective.
The holder is obliged to inform the LL-C of any change management system, or
modifications, affecting the extent of certification validity, e.g.
The certification system of the LL-C is based on the requirements of applicable standards
and accreditation requirements. All certification holders must be informed in case of their
changes, when the certification system must be modified. This may occur in the following
cases:
- Revision and modification of certification standards
- Modification if accreditation rules (such as changes in the surveillance period,
expenses related to accreditation and audits, etc.).
In case that the holder does not agree to the specific change the contract of certification
ends by the modification approval date.
Fees for certification are set out in the tariff of LL-C, which is based on the applicable
requirements "guidelines for accreditation in accordance with IS0 17021 (MPA). As part
of this accreditation must LL-C fulfil these requirements, especially concerning the time
range of audit.
Fees for certification or any other extra costs are the subject of the certification offer.
Before starting the audit/evaluation the proforma invoice price must be paid in -
accreditation condition, which payment shall not be bound by the conclusion of the
certification process. See F32.
Appeals
Clients may appeal the LL-C decision to the Head of CB within 30 days. He must establish
a 3-member Appeals Committee of auditors/evaluators and experts (including himself),
who were not involved in the certification activities related to complaint or appeal. The
committee reviews and verifies all necessary information and decides, voting with simple
majority.
Complaints
Any third party can complain to LL-C on the certification decision. It followed a similar
procedure as the appeal depending on the type of complaint.
In case of an extraordinary audit is the Appeals Committee is convened only after the
disputation of its outcome.
The precise procedure for receiving complaints and appeals, their evaluation and
implementation is documented in Rule12 - Rules of Appeals Committee.
Due to the SJ-PK certification, LL-C undertakes to provide the Ministry of Transport of the
Czech Republic with information on all classified non-conformities found in the
accreditation process and supervision of the activities of the certification body. The given
obligation is fulfilled according to the requirements of the methodical instruction and
information in Rule 04.
The procedure for the implementation of the joint audit or its system activities is
excluded and is carried out only under the full direction of LL-C Certification a.s.
FSSC and GMP + FSA PORTAL DATA AND DATA OWNERSHIP DOCUMENTATION
a) The (certified) organization is the owner of the audit report, while the CB is
responsible for the data of the report.
b) The certificate holder is a (certified) organization, not the owner. CB is the owner of
the certificate data.
The CO must have a data quality control process in place that guarantees the quality of
the CB portal data. The quality parameters include at least the following:
a) Completeness: All mandatory data have been registered on the Portal;
b) Timeliness: All data were registered on the portal within the required time limits;
c) Validity: The values of the registered data meet the requirements of the scheme;
d) Accuracy: Data is a true representation of actual facts related to the full audit and
certification process;
e) Consistency: The registered data on the Portal represent a real representation of the
data stored in the internal system (s) of the certification bodies.
a) At the request of the certified organization, the certification bodies shall actively
provide the certified organization with access to the related organization profiles, audit
and certification registered on the CO portal using the available function.
(b) the certification body shall ensure that access to the certified organization is granted
only to authorized persons.
The top management shall appoint an accountable manager which will carry on the
security clearance process for ISO 28000 auditors and technical experts. The accountable
manager shall be interviewed and vetted by the top management in order to be
considered as trustworthy, and to have the necessary competence and judgement to vet
candidate security auditors and technical experts. The accountable manager shall have
knowledge and experience sufficient to evaluate the audit processes of a security
management system for the supply chain.
ISO 28000 qualified auditors will undergo the security clearance process every year,
confirming via appointment (F40) that his/her criminal status has not changed since the
last security clearance process and that have no pending case, criminal or civil, before
any judicial authority or agency, and have not been accused of any offense or crime
before any prosecution office and judicial authority.
36 10 march 2021 (:2007 CL1 až CL4, :2020 CL1 až CL3) Ř. Prihara L. Holub