Crossdressing Perspectives of Students
Crossdressing Perspectives of Students
net/publication/324213822
CITATION READS
1 3,997
2 authors, including:
Caitlin Clark
GLSEN
3 PUBLICATIONS 715 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Caitlin Clark on 04 April 2018.
n = 21,228
The report provides multiple recommendations for AISD to improve schools for
transgender students, including making sure each middle and high school has an active
and supported Gay-Straight Alliance, implementing LGBT-inclusive curriculum,
providing professional development opportunities to adults at schools to learn about
transgender people and issues, training adults how to intervene in gender identity- and
expression-based harassment and victimization, and ensuring that school and district
anti-bullying and anti-harassment policies include explicit reference to gender identity
and expression.
Table of Contents
Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 5
References ................................................................................................................................................................ 19
Appendix ................................................................................................................................................................... 21
3
List of Figures
Figure 1. Transgender students like coming to school less than did students who were not transgender. ...............2
Figure 2. Transgender students were less likely to agree that they “will go to college after high school” than were their
non-transgender peers.. .............................................................................................................................................7
Figure 3. Transgender students felt less safe at school than did students who were not transgender. .....................8
Figure 4. Transgender students liked to come to school less than did students who were not transgender. ............8
Figure 5. A higher percentage of transgender students than of students who were not transgender agreed with the
statement “My classmates show respect to each other.”. ..........................................................................................9
Figure 6. A higher percentage of students who were not transgender than of students who were transgender reported
that their classmates showed respect to students who were different than them.. ...................................................9
Figure 7. Transgender students more frequently reported that students at their school were bullied than did students
who were not transgender. ....................................................................................................................................... 10
Figure 8. Transgender students were less likely to report that they were happy with the way their classmates treated
them than were students who were not transgender. .............................................................................................. 10
Figure 9. Transgender students were less likely to report that they got along with their classmates than were non-
transgender students. ............................................................................................................................................... 11
Figure 10. Transgender students were less likely to agree with the item “Teachers at my school care about their
students” than were students who were not transgender. ....................................................................................... 11
Figure 11. Transgender students were less likely to agree with the item, “Adults at this school treat all students fairly”
than were students who were not transgender. ....................................................................................................... 12
Figure 12. The majority of transgender students did not believe that they could talk to adults at their school about their
problems. .................................................................................................................................................................. 12
4
What does Introduction
transgender mean? Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) students experience high levels of
victimization based on their sexual orientation and gender identity and expression in
their schools. This victimization occurs in the form of biased language and verbal
In this report, the term harassment, physical harassment, and even physical assault (Kosciw, Greytak, Giga,
transgender is used broadly to
describe students who do not Villenas, & Danischewski, 2016). These students experience poor school climates, and
identify as the gender they were they navigate schools in which they
assigned at birth. This includes
students who were assigned frequently experience harassment and
LGBT students face high
male or female at birth and now discrimination based on their sexual and
identify as the opposite gender.
gender identities. Transgender students rates of victimization at
It also includes students who
identify as something other than experience this kind of victimization at school, and transgender
the binary male and female higher rates than their lesbian, gay, and
(e.g., agender, genderqueer,
bisexual non-transgender peers (D’Augelli,
students experience this
gender fluid). Some distinguish
between transgender to describe Grossman, & Starks, 2006; Grossman, victimization at the highest
the former, and gender-
nonconforming to describe the Haney, Edwards, Alessi, Ardon, & Howell,
rate.
latter, but this report uses the 2009; Kosciw et al, 2016; McGuire,
umbrella term transgender to
Anderson, Toomey, & Russell, 2010;
describe all of these gender
identities. Toomey, Ryan, Diaz, & Russell, 2011). Previous research and national surveys have
PICTURE PLACEHOLDER found that transgender students face high levels of victimization at their schools and
that this victimization causes them to miss more days of school, have lower grades, and
feel less connected to their school than do their non-transgender peers (Greytak,
Kosciw, & Diaz, 2009; Kosciw et al, 2016; Poteat & Espelage, 2007).
Traditionally, AISD’s Student Climate Survey has asked students to identify their
gender, and the answer choices were “boy” or “girl.” In 2017, a third option was added
to this question on the survey for middle and high school students only, which allowed
students to identify as something other than male or female. When asked their gender,
students were able to select “boy,” “girl,” or “I’d prefer to self-identify.” If students
chose to self-identity, they were provided a space to write in their gender identity.
AISD students who chose this option wrote in many different gender identities. A
complete list can be found in Appendix A. In total, 398 middle and high school students
chose to identify as something other than boy or girl, and of these students, 223 wrote
in a gender identity.
5
It is important to recognize that some transgender students likely were left out of the
following analyses. It is possible that some transgender students marked “boy” or “girl,”
choosing the gender they identify as, instead of the gender they were assigned at birth.
This report, however, only includes students who chose to self-identify, and captures
students who explicitly identified as transgender, for example, writing in “trans boy” or
“trans girl” in the self-identification space. Additionally, students who chose to self-
identify and wrote in a gender identity outside the “traditional” gender binary (i.e., “non-
binary,” “genderqueer,” and “gender fluid”) were included in the analysis. It is important
to note that more students identified this way than identified specifically as “transgender.”
Allowing students to identify as something other than male or female allowed for an
examination of transgender and gender non-conforming students’ perceptions of their
school climate. Additionally, because students’ responses to the Student Climate Survey
were identified, their attendance and State of Texas Assessments for Academic Readiness
(STAAR) passing rates were compared across gender groups. The following report uses
these findings to discuss AISD transgender students’ school experiences.
6
Transgender Students’ Perceptions of Their School Climate
Experiences of Victimization and Feelings of Safety at School
What is an NCE score?
National surveys of LGBT youth have found that transgender students face high levels of
victimization and bias at their schools, and this has a negative impact on these students’ The normal curve equivalent (NCE)
school performance, attendance, and educational aspirations (Greytak et al., 2009; Kosciw was generated for student’s STAAR
scores. Similar to percentile ranks,
et al., 2016). In AISD, transgender students’ school performance in reading and math, numbers range from 0 to 100 on
measured by STAAR normal curve equivalent (NCE) scores, was not significantly different the NCE line, with a standard
from that of students who were not transgender (see sidebar for explanation of NCEs). deviation of 21.06 (Central Rivers
Area Education Agency, 2017).
However, transgender students in AISD had lower college intentions than did students Using NCE scores allows for
who were not transgender (Figure 2). significance testing because NCE
scores can be averaged. Because
the group of transgender students
was so small (n = 398) and
Figure 2. spanned multiple grades (6
Transgender students were less likely to agree that they “will go to college after high through 11), NCE scores were used
school” than were their non-transgender peers. to assess student’s STAAR test
performance across different grade
“I will go to college after high school.” levels for math and reading.
Transgender
students
n = 388 PICTURE PLACEHOLDER
Non-transgender
students
n = 20,942
7
Transgender students across the nation, unlike non-transgender students, do not find
their schools to be safe places, and this was also found to be true for some transgender
students in AISD. In 2016–2017, 78% of transgender students reported that they felt safe
at school, which was significantly lower than the percentage of non-transgender students
who reported feeling safe at school (91%) (Figure 3).
Figure 3.
Transgender students felt less safe at school than did students who were not transgender.
“I feel safe at school.”
Transgender
students
n = 355
Non-transgender
students
n = 20,889
GLSEN’s most recent School Climate Survey showed that transgender students had
negative perceptions of their school climate, and they felt less connected to their school
community than did students who were not transgender (Kosciw et al., 2016). In this
national survey, transgender students reported that they frequently heard homophobic
and transphobic language at their schools. Additionally, they reported that this language
was not only used by classmates but also by teachers and adult staff at school. In addition
to verbal abuse, transgender students reported to GLSEN that they experienced physical
harassment and abuse from other students at their school (Greytak et al., 2009; Kosciw et
al., 2016). These experiences of being victimized made school an unwelcoming space for
transgender students. In fact, transgender students in AISD also reported lower levels of
agreement than did their non-transgender peers to the Student Climate Survey item “I like
to come to school” (Figure 4).
Figure 4.
Transgender students liked coming to school less than did students who were not
transgender. “I like to come to school.”
Transgender
students
n = 368
Non-transgender
students
n = 21.228
Though we were unable to explore AISD students’ experiences with verbal and physical
harassment and abuse, AISD’s Student Climate Survey did include a number of items
addressing how students perceive their classmates and how they treated others. Student
Climate Survey results showed that transgender students had less positive perceptions of
their classmates than did students who were not transgender (Figure 5).
Figure 5.
A higher percentage of transgender students than of students who were not transgender
disagreed with the statement “My classmates show respect to each other.”
“My classmates show respect to each other.”
Transgender
students
n = 369
Non-transgender
students
n = 21,372
Figure 6.
A higher percentage of students who were not transgender than of students who were
transgender reported that their classmates showed respect to students who were different
than them.
“My classmates show respect to other students who are different.”
Transgender
students
n = 363
Non-transgender
students
n = 20,905
9
While the two previous survey items addressed how students treated each other generally,
one item on AISD’s Student Climate Survey directly asked about bullying. Previous
research showed that transgender students were targets of victimization and often
experienced bullying in their schools by classmates and even by teachers (Grossman &
D’Augelli, 2006; Grossman, et al., 2009; Kosciw et al., 2016). Though the Student Climate
Survey did not include an item about students’ personal experiences with victimization
and bullying, one item asked students if students at their school were bullied. Transgender
students were more likely to agree with this item than were other students (Figure 7).
Figure 7.
Transgender students more frequently reported that students at their school were bullied
than did students who were not transgender.
Transgender “Students at my school are bullied.”
students
n = 329
Non-transgender
students
n = 17,679
Other items on the Student Climate Survey addressed how students felt about the way they
were treated by their classmates. Again, transgender students had poorer ratings than did
their peers who were not transgender. They were less likely to agree that they were happy
with the way their classmates treated them than were students who were not transgender
(Figure 8).
Figure 8.
Transgender students were less likely to report that they were happy with the way their
classmates treated them than were students who were not transgender.
“I am happy with the way my classmates treat me.”
Transgender
students
n = 367
Non-transgender
students
n = 21,291
10
Additionally, transgender students reported having less positive relationships with their
classmates than did students who were not transgender. Transgender students were more
likely to disagree with the statement “I get along with my classmates” than were their non-
transgender peers (Figure 9).
Figure 9.
Transgender students were less likely to report that they got along with their classmates
than were non-transgender students.
“I get along with my classmates.”
Transgender
students
n = 332
Non-transgender
students
n = 19,905
Items on the Student Climate Survey also addressed students’ perceptions of their teachers,
and of other adults at their school. Transgender students reported fewer positive ratings on
adult items than did students who were not transgender. For example, compared with their
peers who were not transgender, transgender students perceived their teachers to be less
caring (Figure 10).
Figure 10.
Transgender students were less likely to agree with the item “Teachers at my school care
about their students” than were students who were not transgender.
“Teachers at my school cate about their students.”
Transgender
students
n = 358
Non-transgender
students
n = 20,939
11
In addition to having lower perceptions that teachers cared for students, transgender
students also had lower perceptions of adults’ fairness towards students than did their non
-transgender peers (Figure 11).
Figure 11.
Transgender students were less likely to agree with the item, “Adults at this school treat all
students fairly” than were students who were not transgender.
“Adults at this school treat all students fairly.”
Transgender
students
n = 361
Non-Transgender
students
n = 20,889
Additionally, the majority of transgender students did not perceive their school to be a
place where they could seek help. Fewer than half of the transgender students (47%) who
took the Student Climate Survey believed it was easy to talk to adults at their school about
their problems (Figure 12).
Figure 12.
The majority of transgender students did not believe they could talk to adults at their school
about their problems.
“It is easy for me to talk about my problems with the adults at school.”
Transgender
students
n = 354
Non-transgender
students
n = 19,784
12
their experiences of victimization, most reported that the response was not effective.
Considering these findings, it is easy to see why students at AISD might find it hard to talk
to teachers at their school about their problems, especially problems that directly relate to
their gender identity. If teachers are not responding to incidents of harassment and abuse,
and worse yet, sometimes perpetuate this harassment, they are not safe or effective allies
for transgender students.
This is unfortunate and troubling because GLSEN also found that the few students who
had teachers they could regularly talk to about LGBT issues had a higher sense of school
belongingness than did student who did not have teachers to talk to (Greytak et al., 2009).
In AISD, the majority of transgender students do not feel that they can talk to their
teachers about their problems. They likely also feel that they cannot talk to teachers about
LGBT issues, which could be contributing to poor school climate perceptions.
13
In Their Own Words
The AISD 2016–2017 Student Climate Survey also included two open-ended response
questions; students were asked, “Do you feel welcome at your school? What makes you feel
welcome?” and “Do you ever feel unwelcome at school? What makes you feel unwelcome?”
Many transgender students’ responses to these questions addressed their transgender
identity and the general climate for LGBT students at their schools. Many transgender
students referenced transgender and LGBT issues when they were citing reasons they did
not feel welcome in their school.
Many students spoke about how they and other transgender students were discriminated
against at their school. The most common response to what made students feel
unwelcome at school was the bullying they experienced. Students mentioned other
students telling “trans jokes,” “bullying other students just because they are different,”
and “looking at me like I’m an alien and bully me.” Some students generally stated that
they would want the bullying in their school to be minimized (i.e.; “fix bullying,” “make
the school have no bullies,” and “crack down on bullying”). Others asked that their school
“not be transphobic” and wanted their school to “protect the LGBT+ community.”
Some students spoke about supportive teachers and how they create a welcoming
atmosphere. One student wrote, “Everyone praises me for who I am and fights my battles
with me.” Another student stated, “The teachers are open to everyone on the LGBTQ+
community.” Some students reported that teachers acknowledging their gender identity
made them feel welcome, and made statements such as “They make me feel welcome by
calling me my preferred name rather than my birth name” and “The adults always try their
best to recognize that I am a boy.”
15
Conclusions and Recommendations
Findings from this report, when viewed alongside previous findings from national surveys,
illustrate that schools are not always safe or welcoming places for transgender students. In
AISD specifically, compared with their non-transgender classmates, transgender students
had poorer attendance, had lower college intentions, felt less safe at school, and liked
coming to school less. Additionally, these students had more negative perceptions of their
classmates and teachers than did students who were not transgender. Transgender AISD
students’ perceptions of their school climates were lower than those of their non-
transgender peers. A previous report from AISD’s Department of Research and Evaluation
found similar results for other minoritized groups, including ethnic and racial minorities,
students requiring special education services, students from economically disadvantaged
families, and English language learners (Clark, 2017). It is not uncommon to find that
students from less privileged groups and students with minoritized identities have less
positive experiences in their school environments.
However, there is a crucial difference between these previously studied groups and
transgender students. AISD, and most other school districts, provide systems and
structures to support other kinds of minoritized students. For example, schools provide
free and reduced lunch and other services to economically disadvantaged students. AISD’s
Multilingual Education Team exists to support students who are English language learners.
Special education services are provided at all schools to better care for and educate
students who need special services. Programs and curricula are implemented to teach
students about appreciating ethnic and racial diversity. While AISD has programs that
generally teach about respecting diversity and non-discrimination (e.g., No Place For Hate,
Social and Emotional Learning, and Culturally Responsive Practices), no official system or
program exists to specifically support transgender students at district schools, or explicitly
teach acceptance of transgender people.
GSAs serve LGBT students and straight allies who choose to join the club. As important
and effective as they are, they do not serve the entire school population. LGBT-inclusive
curricula should be implemented in middle and high schools, teaching all students about
LGBT people and issues. This not only increases all students knowledge about LGBT
people, but also teaches all students to be more tolerant and accepting of LGBT people.
Inclusive curriculum helps create a safer school climate for LGBT youth, helps these
students feel more connected to their schools, and can help increase peer acceptance of
LGBT students and decrease LGBT-based bullying and victimization. LGBT-inclusive
curriculum at schools has been shown to make schools safer for LGBT students, with less
harassment (O’Shaughnessy et el., 2004) and less gender identity- and sexual orientation-
based bullying (Russell, Kostroski, McGuire, Laub, & Manke, 2006).
Finally, GLSEN (Kosciw et al., 2016) found that many students who overheard biased
17
language from their classmates also reported that teachers who observed these incidents
never intervened. Research on bullying has outlined the “bystander effect,” in which
observers are less likely to intervene when they see bullying occur and other people are
present (Polanin, Espelage, & Pigott, 2012). As has already been discussed, in many cases
of bullying of transgender students, teachers and adults play the role of bystanders who do
not intervene. However, research on the bystander effect has shown that bystander
intervention in instances of bullying are often successful at reducing victimization (Craig,
Pepler, & Atlas, 2000). These findings illustrate why it is crucial to train teachers and
adults, arming them with knowledge about transgender students and how to respond to
gender identity based bullying. This training can make adults more capable and
empowered to intervene when they observe such bullying, which can reduce the rates of
victimization of transgender youth in their schools (Polanin et al., 2012). Training should
be provided to AISD teachers and staff so they have the skills to intervene and correct
students when these biased incidents happen, creating a more supportive environment for
the school’s transgender students.
Finally, the district needs to reevaluate its anti-discrimination and anti-bullying policies
to ensure that they include explicit reference to gender identity- and gender-expression
based harassment and victimization. Research shows that such school and district policies
contribute to more positive school climates for transgender students. For example, clearly
explicit and enumerated anti-bullying and anti-harassment policies have been found to
improve school climates and experiences for LGBT students (Mallon & Decrescenzo, 2006;
Russel & McGuire, 2008; Toomey et al., 2012; ).
18
References
Central Rivers Area Education Agency. (2017). What is a normal curve equivalent score?
Retrieved from https://www.centralriversaea.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/
C4_Normal-Curve-Equivalent-NCE-Revised-5.22.17.pdf
Clark, C. (2017). Student climate survey results: Spring 2017, comparisons of student
groups. Austin, TX: Austin Independent School District.
Craig, W. M., Pepler, D., & Atlas, R. (2000). Observations of bullying in the playground
and in the classroom. School Psychology International, 21(2), 22–36.
D’Augelli, A.R., Grossman, A. H., & Starks, M. T. (2006). Childhood gender atypicality,
victimization and PTSD among lesbian, gay, and bisexual youth. Journal of
Interpersonal Violence, 21, 1462–1482.
Greytak, E. A., Kosciw, J.G., & Diaz E. M. (2009). Harsh realities: The experiences of
transgender youth in our nation’s schools. New York: GLSEN.
Grossman, A. H., Haney, A. P., Edwards, P., Alessi, E. J., Ardon, M., & Howell, T.J. (2009).
Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender youth talk about experiencing and coping
with school violence: A qualitative study. Journal of LGBT Youth, 6, 24–46.
Ioverno, S., Belser, A. B., Baiocco, R., Grossman, A. H., & Russell, S. T. (2016). The
protective role of gay-straight alliances for lesbian, gay, bisexual, and questioning
students: A prospective analysis. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender
Diversity, 3(4), 397.
Kosciw, F. G., Greytak, E. A., Giga, N. M., Villenas, C., & Danischewski, D. J. (2016). The
experiences of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer youth in our nation’s
schools. New York, NY: GLSEN.
Mallon, G. P., & DeCrescenzo, T. (2006). Transgender children and youth: A child
welfare practice perspective. Journal of Homosexuality , 42(1), 215–241.
McGuire, J. K., Anderson, C. R., Toomey, R. B., & Russell, S. T. (2010). School climate for
transgender youth: A mixed method investigation of student experiences and
school responses. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39(10), 1175–1188.
O’Shaughnessy, M., Russell, S., Heck, K., Calhoun, C., & Laub, C. (2004). Safe place to
learn: Consequences of harassment based on actual or perceived sexual orientation
and gender non-conformity and steps for making schools safer. San Francisco, CA:
California Safe Schools Coalition.
19
Polanin, J. R., Espelage, D. L., & Pigott, T. D. (2012). A meta-analysis or school-based
bullying prevention programs’ effects on bystander intervention behavior. School
Psychology Review, 41(1), 47–65.
Russell, S. T., Kostroski, O., McGuire, J. K., Laub, C., & Manke, E. (2006). LGBT issues in
the curriculum promotes school safety (California Safe Schools Coalition Research
Brief No. 4). San Francisco, CA: California Safe Schools Coalition.
Russell, S. T., & McGuire, J. K. (2008). The school climate for lesbian, gay, bisexual, and
transgender (LGBTQ) students. In M. Shinn, & H. Yoshikawa (Eds.), Toward positive
youth development: Transforming schools and community programs (pp. 133–149).
New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Toomey, R. B., Ryan, C., Diaz, R. M., & Russell, S. T. (2011). High school gay-straight
alliances (GSAs) and young adult well-being: An examination of GSA presence,
participation, and perceived effectiveness. Applied Developmental Science, 15(4), 175
–185.
Walls, N. E., Kane, S. B., & Wisneski, H. (2010). Gay-straight alliances and school
experiences of sexual minority youth. Youth & Society, 41(3), 307–332.
20
Appendix A.
Students’ Reported Gender Identities From the AISD 2016–2017 Student Climate Survey
Response written in after “I prefer Number of Response written in after “I prefer to Number of
to self-identify” responses self-identify” responses
“Boy” or “girl,” opposite of what the 31 Boy girl 1
student’s official school records state
Genderfluid 27 Demiboy 1
Non binary 27 Demigirl 1
Agender 18 Doesn’t matter 1
Transgender 12 Either 1
Neither 10 Feminino 1
Both 7 Figuring it out 1
I don’t know 6 Gender neutral 1
They/them 5 Gender roles are stupid 1
Genderqueer 4 Gendervoid 1
Person 4 He/she 1
? 3 He/they/them 1
Androgynous 3 He, him, they 1
FTM (female to male) 3 I don’t even know honestly 1
Gender non-conforming 3 I think that I feel like I am a girl but 1
then I feel that I am a boy.
None 3 I’d prefer not to answer 1
Other 3 Male/female 1
Trans 3 Mascugender 1
Who knows? 3 Me 1
Gender is a social construct 2 Neutral 1
Maybe 2 Quadgender Demiboy 1
Transmasculine 2 Questioning 1
Transgender male 1 She/they/occasionally her 1
A person in between 1 Tomboy 1
Ambigender 1 Trans boy 1
Better not say 1 Trans woman 1
Bigender 1 Two genders 1
Boi or girl 1 Unknown 1
Born a girl but identify as a boy 1 I do not like to tell people 1
Source. 2016–2017 AISD Student Climate Survey
21
Appendix B.
Percentage of Students Who Agreed With Each Statement on the AISD 2016-2017 Student
Climate Survey
Non-
Transgender
transgender
students
students
My classmates show respect to other students who are different. 73% 85%
22
Appendix C.
Percentage of Students Who Disagreed With Each Statement on the AISD 2016-2017 Student
Climate Survey
Non-
Transgender
transgender
students
students
My classmates show respect to other students who are different. 27% 15%