Week 06-2 PHYS 158-2024
Week 06-2 PHYS 158-2024
Gauss’s law.
Symmetry of the charge distribution.
Applications: E-field of:
• point charge
• infinite sheet of charge
• infinite line of charge
• charged sphere (if time permits)
Last Time
1
Gauss’s law = 𝑘𝑘
4𝜋𝜋𝜀𝜀0
𝑄𝑄in
Net electric flux through a closed surface = charge inside that surface/ε0 Φ𝑒𝑒 =
𝜀𝜀0
⃗ We get:
• Now, let’s recall the definition of the flux: Φ𝑒𝑒 = ∮ 𝐸𝐸 � 𝑑𝑑𝐴𝐴.
𝑄𝑄in
𝑄𝑄𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖 : total (net) charge
+ Φ𝑒𝑒 = � 𝐸𝐸 ⋅ 𝑑𝑑 𝐴𝐴⃗ =
inside a closed surface.
+
𝜀𝜀0
The ∮ … 𝑑𝑑 𝐴𝐴⃗ notation:
integrate the flux over
+
a closed surface −
(enclosing the charge 𝑄𝑄in ) Gauss’s law relates electric field with charges
that create this field
Q: Rank the magnitudes of the electric flux passing through the 4 surfaces.
−𝑄𝑄 4
A. 1=2=3=4 1
B. 1>2=4>3 +3𝑄𝑄
C. 3>2>1>4 −2𝑄𝑄
D. 3>2>1=4 2
E. None of the above
Q: Rank the magnitudes of the electric flux passing through the 4 surfaces.
−𝑄𝑄 4
A. 1=2=3=4 1
B. 1>2=4>3 +3𝑄𝑄
C. 3>2>1>4 −2𝑄𝑄
D. 3>2>1=4 2
E. None of the above
Q: What is the sign (positive or negative) of the NET electric flux passing through the
four side surfaces of this cube?
(Remember the cube has 6 sides. It has a TOP, BOTTOM and 4 SIDE surfaces)
z
1
5 L
6 4
+𝑄𝑄 +𝑄𝑄
3
2
y
Top view
3-D view
x
A. Positive
B. Negative
C. Zero
D. Not enough information is given to answer
Q: What is the sign (positive or negative) of the NET electric flux passing through the
four side surfaces of this cube?
(Remember the cube has 6 sides. It has a TOP, BOTTOM and 4 SIDE surfaces)
z
Φ5 > 0 Φ1 > 0
1
5 Φ4 > 0 L
6 4
+𝑄𝑄 +𝑄𝑄
Φ6 < 0 3
2
y
Top view Φ3 > 0
3-D view Φ2 > 0
x
• Φ1 > 0 & Φ2 > 0 (since the flux is outwards)
A. Positive
• Since there is no charge inside: Φ1 + Φ2 + Φ3 + Φ4 + Φ5 + Φ6 = 0
B. Negative
C. Zero • Hence, Φ3 + Φ4 + Φ5 + Φ6 < 0
D. Not enough information is given to answer
How to make Gauss’s law user-friendly?
where the integral is taken over an arbitrary surface
𝑄𝑄in enclosing the charge 𝑄𝑄in .
⃗
Φ𝑒𝑒 = � 𝐸𝐸 ⋅ 𝑑𝑑𝐴𝐴 =
𝜀𝜀0 Note that here 𝐸𝐸 is the electric field at that surface.
• Gauss’s law is useful only if we can calculate this integral easily. We could do it if:
Φ𝑒𝑒 = 0
𝐸𝐸 is normal to the surface, and constant at every point of that surface. Then:
𝑄𝑄in
Φ𝑒𝑒 = � 𝐸𝐸 ⋅ 𝑑𝑑𝐴𝐴⃗ =
𝜀𝜀0
• How can we choose the integration surface (“Gaussian surface”) with such properties?
⃗ (b) same magnitude of the field, 𝐸𝐸, on the surface
(a) fixed angle between 𝐸𝐸 and 𝑑𝑑 𝐴𝐴,
• Remember that in the Gauss’s law the integral is taken over any arbitrary
surface enclosing the charge – the choice of the Gaussian surface is ours!
Using Gauss’s law (example 1) Q: Use Gauss’s law to find electric field of a
point charge +𝑞𝑞 at a distance 𝑟𝑟 from it.
GS-2
+ +𝑞𝑞
GS-1
Q: How is that possible that the flux through these two Gaussian surfaces is equal to the
same value, 𝑞𝑞/𝜀𝜀0 ? They have different areas!
D. None of them
E. All of them
A B C
Symmetries
Q: You are asked to use Gauss’s Law to calculate the electric field at a
distance 𝑟𝑟 away from a charged cube of dimension 𝑎𝑎. Which of the
following Gaussian surfaces is best suited for this purpose?
D. None of them
E. All of them
A B C
It should, at least, clearly have the same value of 𝐸𝐸 in all its points.
To make it possible, the charge distribution should have “enough symmetry”
Gauss’s law can be used to calculate electric fields only in cases of highly-symmetric
charge distributions.
Q: Which of the objects below have an electric field that is symmetric enough to
make Gauss’s law useful?
•A.All Only
pointselectric dipole
at a distance 𝑟𝑟 from the point charge
are equivalent => expect same field magnitude.
B.Direction:
Only point charge & insulating cube
radially away form the charge (there is • All points at a distance 𝑟𝑟 from the rod are
equivalent => expect same field magnitude (no
C.noOnly
reasonlong
for ituniformly
to be tilted charged cylinder
in any direction)
reason to be different below or above the rod).
D. Only point charge Direction: perpendicular to the rod (there is no
reason for it to be tilted left or right)
E. Only the point charge & long cylinder
Gauss’s law can be used to calculate electric fields only if we manage to come up with a
Gaussian surface that matches the symmetry of the charge distributions.
Q: To successfully apply Gauss’s law, which Gaussian surface will work for a large
(infinite) sheet of charge?
Q: To successfully apply Gauss’s law, which Gaussian surface will work for a large
(infinite) sheet of charge?
𝑑𝑑
3. Enclosed charge: 𝑄𝑄𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖 = ?
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
4. Gauss’s law: Φ𝑒𝑒 = 𝑄𝑄𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖 ⁄𝜀𝜀0
Using Gauss’s law (example 2) Q: Find electric field of an infinite charged plane at a
vertical distance 𝑑𝑑 from it. Assume uniform surface
𝑄𝑄
1. Matching GS? charge density 𝜎𝜎 = (C/m2) Ex 22.7
𝐴𝐴
• Prism / cylinder, with horizontal sides above and below the sheet
by 𝑑𝑑
𝑛𝑛1 𝐸𝐸1
P
𝑑𝑑
𝑛𝑛4 𝑛𝑛3
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + • By symmetry, the electric field
lines should be perpendicular to
𝑑𝑑 the sheet => no flux is lost through
the vertical sides of the prism =>
all flux goes through the top and
𝑛𝑛2 𝐸𝐸2 the bottom
Using Gauss’s law (example 2) Q: Find electric field of an infinite charged plane at a
vertical distance 𝑑𝑑 from it. Assume uniform surface
𝑄𝑄
1. Matching GS? charge density 𝜎𝜎 = (C/m2)
𝐴𝐴 Ex 22.7
Prism / cylinder (only T = top, B = bottom)