Phil of Scie Course Outline
Phil of Scie Course Outline
Course Description
The course philosophy of science is a survey of philosophical issues surrounding the concepts
and practices of science in general and modern science in particular. Most of its contents overlap
with epistemology, metaphysics, and ontology. It tends to critically analyze, evaluate natures,
features, characters, and elements of scientific knowledge and practices. This course is also
where we connect philosophical views about science to the actual scientific practice in the
human society. The course covers the major areas of classical and contemporary philosophy of
science, including scientific reasoning, scientific progress, interpretations of scientific
knowledge, and the social organization of scientific practice. Its aim is not only to familiarize
students with philosophical issues about science and scientific discourses but also to equip them
to critically and normatively interpret and reflect on scientific theories and practices.
Specifically this course will examine a number of philosophical issues about science such as:
(1) Demarcation. What distinguishes science from non-science, and real from bogus science? Is
Creation Science? (2) Explanation. What is it to explain something? Does explanation require
universal laws? Does it depend on context? (3) Validation. How are scientific theories validated
or confirmed? Is validation a simple matter of gathering inductive support? Of making
predictions that are borne out by the evidence? Of trying but failing to falsify a theory? Or does it
also depend on "pragmatic" matters such as the simplicity, elegance, or scope of the theory?
4
(3) Values and Objectivity. Is science necessarily value-laden? To what extent does the intrusion
of the values of the scientist diminish or make impossible objectivity in science? (4) Realism. Do
highly theoretical entities really exist, or are they just fictions or useful tools for making
predictions? Does science discover the truth about the real world, or create a world of its own?
(5) Limits. Is science the only reliable method for finding out about the world? Are there any
truths which are simply inaccessible to scientific method? (If so, is there any other method to
which they are accessible?) (6) Philosophy and Particular Sciences. Depending on the interests
and specialties of class members, we may also explore the philosophical implications of
particular scientific results, e.g. the implications of sociobiology for ethics or of quantum physics
To enable students study and understand the nature of scientific knowledge and how it emerged
from certain philosophical paradigms.
To enable students appreciate the deep philosophical questions that underlie science
To enable students to articulate the method of science
To enable students use philosophical approach to distinguish between genuine and pseudo- or
“junk” science
COURSE CONTENT
What is Philosophy?
What is Science?
4
CHAPTER TWO: INDUCTION AND DUCTIONISM
What is falsificationism?
4
Relativism and the role of reason in science
4.2. Feyerabend
Scientific Realism
Scientific Antirealism (Instrumentalism)
The “no miracle argument”
CHAPTER SIX: SCIENCE AND ITS CRTICS
Advantages of science
Disadvantages of science
References
A.J Ayer, “The Elimination of Metaphysics”
Karl Popper, “Science: Conjectures and Refutations,”
Karl Popper , “Darwinism as a Metaphysical Research Program”
Don Gillies, Philosophy of Science in the Twentieth Century (Blackwells)
Theodore Schick, Readings in the Philosophy of Science: From Positivism to Postmodernism
(McGraw-Hill, 1999)
Thomas Kuhn, “Logic of Discovery or Psychology of Research”
Thomas Kuhn, from The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
Larry Laudan, “Science at the Bar—Causes for Concern”
Michael Huemer, Skepticism and the Veil of Perception
Rom Harre, Principles of Scientific Thinking
George Reisch, “Pluralism, Logical Empiricism, and the Problem of Pseudoscience”
Stephen Cole, “Voodoo Sociology: Recent Developments in the Sociology of Science”
John Searle, from The Construction of Social Reality
Tara Smith, “Social Objectivity and the Objectivity of Value”