Scribd
Upload
70 views

Referee Report For AAS Applications

The document is a referee report form for an applicant for an Australia Awards Scholarship. It requests evaluation of the applicant's capabilities and behaviors, general comments on why the applicant should be considered, and academic referee comments if applicable for PhD or research masters candidates.

Uploaded by

Niken Apsari
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
70 views

Referee Report For AAS Applications

The document is a referee report form for an applicant for an Australia Awards Scholarship. It requests evaluation of the applicant's capabilities and behaviors, general comments on why the applicant should be considered, and academic referee comments if applicable for PhD or research masters candidates.

Uploaded by

Niken Apsari
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

Referee Report

The applicant has named you as a referee in support of an application for an Australia Awards Scholarship supported by
the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) for study in Australia. To assist in the selection process, we would like
to receive your views on the applicant’s suitability for a Scholarship, in particular on their capabilities and personal
qualities, academic competence (including, where applicable, their research ability) and potential outcomes.

1. Personal details

Applicant’s details

Full name (as it appears in


Ni Luh Putu Niken Apsari
passport)

Email [email protected]

Area of research interest Early Childhood Education

Referee’s details

Family name
Given names
Mobile no. Work phone no.
Email
Employing organisation Name
Town/City, Country
Position title Starting date / /
Length of time you have Less than 3–12
1–2 years 2–5 years More than 5 years
known applicant 3 months months
Relationship to applicant (e.g.
direct supervisor, lecturer,
peer, etc)

Authorised official stamp of


the organisation.
2. Evaluation of applicant’s capabilities and behaviours

Please evaluate the applicant against the following criteria*

Very good Satisfactory Needs coaching Not observed

Shapes strategic thinking (meaning that they:


inspire a sense of purpose and direction; focus
strategically; harness information and opportunities;
and show judgement, intelligence and
commonsense)

Achieves results (meaning that they: build


organisation capability and responsiveness;
marshal professional expertise; steer and
implement change and deal with uncertainty;
ensure closure and deliver on intended results)

Cultivates productive working relationships


(meaning that they: nurture internal and external
relationships; facilitate cooperation and
partnerships; value individual differences and
diversity; and guide, mentor and develop people)

Displays personal drive and integrity (meaning that


they: demonstrate professionalism and probity;
commit to action; display resilience; promote and
adopt a positive and balanced approach to work;
and demonstrate self awareness and a commitment
to personal development)

Communicates and negotiates effectively (meaning


that they: communicate clearly; listen, understand
and adapts to audience; and negotiates
persuasively)

* Extract from the Australian Public Service Commission’s ‘The integrated leadership system – support tools – Leadership
pathway: Individual profiles’

3. General comments
Why should the applicant be considered for a Scholarship?

4. Academic referee comments – applicable to PhD and Masters by Research candidates only
In the past five years, how many research higher degree (PhD, Masters) candidates have you worked with?

Your professional knowledge of the applicant is: Very detailed Very good Good Incomplete

Score the following criteria out of 10 (A score of 10 means that you regard the applicant as being in the top 2%
of all candidates in each assessment category. A score of 9 indicates that the applicant is in the top 5% of all
candidates. A score of 8 - top 10%; score of 7 - top 20%; score of 6 - top 30%; score of 5 - top 40%; Score
score of 4 - upper 50%; score of 3 - upper 60%; score of 2 - upper 70%; score of 1 - bottom 30%)

(a) Research potential: intrinsic research potential (as distinct from examination results).

(b) Creative Ability: ability to develop original ideas/hypotheses, to write original compositions
or to assemble conventional work in some original way

(c) Initiative: ability to embark on new ideas or approaches without prompting

(d) Perseverance: ability to work steadily even in difficult circumstances or where motivation or
external direction is minimal.

(e) Critical thinking: ability to differentiate between sound and irrationally based thinking

(f) Team work: ability to work in a research group

(g) Ability to Communicate: both written and spoken

Please comment on evidence of the applicant’s research potential and achievement (such as the outcomes of their research
experience and training, including university studies, publications, papers, and other relevant work) and any other comments
relevant to the applicant’s admission to a PhD (maximum 300 words).

5. Referee’s declaration and signature

I declare that the information in this report is true and correct.

Signature Date / /

Thank you for assisting the Australian Government in identifying an outstanding candidate for an Australia Awards
Scholarship.

You might also like