Articulo Mdpi
Articulo Mdpi
Review
Solar Energy-Based Future Perspective for Organic Rankine
Cycle Applications
Raúl Alejandro Martínez-Sánchez 1,† , Juvenal Rodriguez-Resendiz 1 *,† , José Manuel Álvarez-Alvarado 1,†
and Idalberto Macías-Socarrás 2
Abstract: This article explores the patents of solar energy technologies in the organic Rankine cycle
(ORC) applications. The conversion of low-quality thermal energy into electricity is one of the main
characteristics of an ORC, making efficient and viable technologies available today. However, only a
few and outdated articles that analyze patents that use solar energy technologies in ORC applications
exist. This leads to a lack of updated information regarding the number of published patents,
International Patent Classification (IPC) codes associated with them, technology life cycle status,
and the most relevant patented developments. Thus, this article conducts a current investigation
of patents published between January 2010 and May 2022 using the Preferred Reporting Items for
Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology and keywords. One thousand two
Citation: Martínez-Sánchez, R.A.; hundred ninety-nine patents were obtained as part of the study and classified in F and Y groups of
Rodríguez-Reséndiz, J.; the IPC. The time-lapse analyzed was between January 2010 and May 2022. In 2014 and 2015, a peak
Álvarez-Alvarado, J.M.; of published patents was observed. China (CN) was the country that published the most significant
Macías-Socarrás, I. Solar number of patents worldwide. However, the European Patent Office (EP), the World Intellectual
Energy-Based Future Perspective for Property Organization (WO), and the United States (US) publish the patents with the highest number
Organic Rankine Cycle Applications.
of patent citations. Furthermore, the possible trend regarding the development of patents for each
Micromachines 2022, 13, 944.
technology is presented. A high-performance theoretical ORC plant based on the patent information
https://doi.org/10.3390/
analyzed by this article is introduced. Finally, exploration of IPC revealed 17 codes related to solar
mi13060944
energy technologies in ORC applications not indexed in the main search.
Academic Editor: Francesco Di
Giacomo Keywords: organic Rankine cycle; solar energy; photovoltaic cell; solar tower; parabolic dish;
Received: 16 May 2022 parabolic trough; linear fresnel reflector
Accepted: 13 June 2022
Published: 14 June 2022
establishes strategies for identifying and monitoring trends in developing new technologies
from a technical perspective [3].
On a global level, companies are in the process of constant improvement to be sus-
tainable in the long term. Business competition is fierce, and introducing innovations or
promoting R&D activities can make a difference on the road to success. Patent development
can be considered a rectangular stone to gain a competitive advantage [4].
The annual number of patent applications worldwide has been increasing. This
has made the ability to process all applications a cumbersome process for the patent
examiners [5]. The in-depth knowledge of the terminology and structure of IPC allows
for searching and analyzing patents with accuracy since it covers the spectrum where a
specific patent can be indexed [6].
A review of the status of published patents on using the solar resource for implemen-
tation in an ORC is vital for developing current and future research. Moreover, it helps to
determine the trends of scientific research lines and the status of the different technologies
worldwide. It will also enable researchers to understand if the product they are working
on has been developed elsewhere [7].
The objective of this article is to explore the status of patents on the application of solar
energy in an ORC. In the last decade, technological advances increased solar collection
efficiency. Due to these factors, new techniques have been implemented to supply energy
to an ORC [8]. Therefore, many patents and applications worldwide have been generated.
Knowing if a product has been developed saves manufacturing time and financial resources
and makes it easier to direct the research efforts in a different direction [9].
The article is structured as follows: Section 1, introduces the topic, its importance,
and the contribution it intends to achieve. Section 2 presents the current context for the
development of the article. Section 3 defines the keywords and the methodology to obtain
the analyzed information. Section 4 discusses the results obtained by analyzing tables and
figures. Finally, Section 5 presents the conclusions, bibliographical references, terminologies
used and future perspectives are shown.
2. Background
An ORC is a thermodynamic system that allows to produce power or work and
behaves in the same way as a conventional Rankine steam cycle. The main difference is in
the working fluid and the operating temperature of the cycle [10].
ORC-based systems are a viable option for power generation as it is easier to obtain
the necessary components for their operation on the market [11]. The ORC consists of
four stages [12]:
• Isentropic compression in the pump;
• Isobaric evaporation in the boiler;
• Isentropic expansion in the turbine;
• Isobaric condensation in the condenser.
As for the working fluids, the ORC uses organic refrigerants with low condensation
and boiling points. This withstands the use of low-grade heat, low temperature, and
pressure [13].
An ORC plant can use heat sources of up to 400 °C and generate electrical power in a
range of 1 kW and 10 MW [14]. The implementation of solar collection is a sustainable way
of supplying energy carriers due to the compatibility with the operating temperature of the
ORC [15].
Developing and implementing ORC-based and solar collection systems is a way to
generate electricity in an environmentally friendly way. This strategy reduces greenhouse
gases in the atmosphere, and sustainable technology to produce electricity is standardized [16].
The sun is the natural regulator of temperature in the terrestrial atmosphere. Daily, it
radiates to our planet the energy consumed by society in one year. Electricity production
from this type of renewable energy has increased due to its potential and the technological
advances made in capturing solar radiation, as shown in Figure 1 [17].
Micromachines 2022, 13, 944 3 of 18
15.0%
2020
5.0%
0.0%
-5.0%
-10.0%
GDP TES OIL NUCLEAR COAL NATURAL RENEWABLES ELECTRICY CO₂
GAS
Figure 1. Change in key global indicators for energy demand and emissions, 2020 and 2021. Reprinted
from Ref. [18].
Different technologies can convert solar energy into electricity or heat by using a solar
tower, a photovoltaic cell, a parabolic dish, p and a linear Fresnel reflector [19]. Solar
radiation is a free and inexhaustible energy. The technologies used for its operation have a
durability of more than 15 years [20].
ORC plants are not designed to use solar energy. Due to the development of organic
fluids and the increasing efficiency in solar collection, it has been possible to incorporate
them into its operation [21]. Traditionally, ORC has been combined with other heat sources
such as engine exhaust gases, boilers, etc. [22]. The emission reduction potential in the high
proportion renewable energy system for ORC applications should be explored due to its
value in the trading market [23].
Thus, Figure 2 presents five main types of technologies for power generation using
solar energy technologies in ORC applications.
3. Theoretical Bases
Keywords are useful for indexing large volumes of information from the web. How-
ever, refining the search methodology is vital to obtaining accurate results [24]. Today
there are more than 100 offices and 120 million patents worldwide. All this information
is available on the internet. Therefore, performing an efficient search could reduce R&D
times [25].
Table 1 depicts the search strategy used to obtain the list of patents related to imple-
menting solar collection technologies in an ORC.
Technology research and development strategies can be established by consulting the
existing patents for technology such as educational institutions, legal entities, and industries.
Micromachines 2022, 13, 944 4 of 18
The patent status, date of publication, country, and name of the inventor or assignee is
found on the internet. However, to obtain accurate information, search criteria and reliable
query should be established [27].
The information is disaggregated in the search for published patents referring to
the use of solar energy in an ORC. Likewise, obtaining the IPC code where a patent is
classified is complex. In some cases, patents are shown that are not related to the search
that has been defined. A study that organizes the information of the number of patents by
technology, year of publication, relevant developments, IPC codes where they are indexed,
and countries or assignees that are at the forefront in the publication of patents, is necessary
to establish the degree of penetration of power generation systems that use an ORC in
different countries. Establishing cooperative alliances to promote its use where conditions
encourage the development of sustainable technologies [28,29].
The indexed results are compared using the exact keywords in Google Patents and
Scopus Patent. However, when analyzing the data obtained using Excel tools based on the
names of the patents, IPC code, country/assignee, patent date publication, and inventor
name, it is noted that the indexing carried out by Google Patents contains all results returned
by Scopus Patent. Therefore, Google Patent was chosen as the default search engine.
Figure 3 displays the patent selection process for this article using the PRISMA method-
ology [30]. The time-lapsed analyzed is between January 2010 and May 2022.
Photovoltaic
cell, 35.6%
Parabolic
trough, 15.2%
Parabolic dish,
11.5%
Solar tower,
25.6%
Figure 4. Distribution of different technologies in ORC applications for solar energy patents.
The number of patents published on PVC and STP could be given by the cost of the
equipment used to put this type of technology into operation, energy efficiency, and the
durability of the devices [31].
Figure 5 shows the evolution of the number of patents published between 2010 and
2022. There is an average of similar publications from the beginning of the period until 2012.
A considerable increase in the number of patents occurred during 2013. The maximum
peak was reached in 2014 with 219 published patents. The growing disclosure of the
benefits and facilities offered by an ORC allows for an increase in the number of published
patents [27].
The number of publications decreased moderately in 2015. However, in 2016 there was
a considerable rise in the number of published patents, and between 2017 and 2019, there
was a similar average in patented developments. In 2020 and 2021, there was a downward
trend, with only 81 and 44 patents being published yearly, respectively. Until 1 May 2022,
six patents had been published.
Micromachines 2022, 13, 944 6 of 18
These figures are alarming for developing plants with ORC and incorporating PVC,
STP, LFR, PDC, and PTC systems into their operation. The COVID-19 pandemic, which
has paralyzed R&D activities, and the loss of interest in generating energy with solar
technology in ORC applications, could be fundamental factors for the decrease of published
patents [32].
200
159
150 143
123
111 105
102
100
78 81
63 65
50 44
6
0
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Publication per year
Annual average of patents published from 2010 to 2022 was 108. Therefore, monitoring
number of patents issued in the period 2022–2030 will give insight into the technological
progress in an ORC through solar collection systems.
Figure 6 shows countries and organizations with the most significant impact on patent
publications worldwide. China (CN) is the largest generator of publications, with a third of
the generated patents . However, the United States (US), the World Intellectual Property
Organization (WO), and the European Patent Office (EP) also have a significant number
of patent publications. Developed countries or their assignees have more than 92% of
published patents.
Other countries,
7.70%
European Patent
Office (EP), 8.55%
World Intellectual
United States Property
(US), 11.86% Organization (WO),
13.78%
Of the countries in the Americas, excluding the English-speaking countries, only Brazil
and Mexico have patent publications; 31 and 6, respectively. Central America and part of
South America have good solar radiation values to implement ORC plants that incorporate
solar collection systems [33].
Micromachines 2022, 13, 944 7 of 18
Figure 7 sorts worldwide published patents for solar energy technologies in ORC
application by country. CN has the most significant number of publications, with 468.
39.7% belongs to PVC, 32.1% to STP, 13.5% to PDC, 10.3% to PTC, and 4.4% to LFR.
CN has promoted international scientific collaboration, which has favored the devel-
opment of its researchers and science and technology. Implementing government programs
to develop technology and construction of large factories for firms from other countries
have provided the opportunity to perform the latest scientific advances first-hand [34].
US, WO, and EP have similar numbers of published patents for solar energy tech-
nologies in ORC applications. Although CN has most significant number of publications,
the US has the largest number of citations per capita, setting the trend in development
lines [35].
198
200
Number of Published Patents
Photovoltaic cells
180
165
160 Solar tower
140
120 Parabolic dish
100
80 Parabolic trough
65
61
60 50
39 41 Linear Fresnel reflectors
40 30 33 32 35
25 25 23
21 1815 19 19 21 21 18 19
17 16
20 10 12
14
10 13111410 121012
8
1514
10 10 11 12 9
8 7
4 7 7
3 3 5 6 2 4
0
CN WO US EP Other Korea Japan (JP) Germany Canada Taiwan Australia
countries (KR) (DE) (CA) (TW)
Country / Assignee
Figure 7. Number of patents and solar energy technologies in ORC application for different coun-
tries/organizations.
Data analysis obtained in the tables demonstrates how CN dramatically impacts the
number of patent publications. As long as solar energy technologies in ORC applications
are considered necessary, the percentage of publications worldwide will remain stable.
However, the US has the most relevant patents published between 2010 and 2022, which is
synonymous with the quality of the research they generate. Other offices, such as WO and
EP, also have patents of interest that seem helpful in improving the performance of ORC
applications. The almost non-existent number of patents developed in Central and South
America depicts how far the region is from being part of the select group of inventors and
developers of solar energy technologies. The short distance from a a world power, such
as the US, should enable the search for cooperation mechanisms, in order to promote and
massify the use of the ORC application for power generation.
70
Solar Energy
Technology
LFR
60 PDC
PTC
PVC
STP
40
30
20
10
0
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20
F28D 2020/0047,
1.2%
Table 2. Cont.
Table 3 presents the IPC codes linked to solar energy technologies in ORC applications
that were not included in the initial search. The lack of precision in the indexed data
happens when only keywords are used when performing the search. As a rule, concepts
associated with and specific to a patent are not used when searching for information.
Likewise, IPC codes are not tracked in the search for patent information. The consequence
is the appearance of patents that are not within the defined search range [44].
The most important result of the article is the non-appearance of the IPC codes related
to solar energies technologies in ORC applications in the keyword search is shown in
Table 3. The analysis of studies such as [44] makes it possible to establish a procedure for
correctly indexing of published patents regarding the subject of study. The conclusion is
that with the sole use of keywords, results obtained in the search only show 81% of the
total number of patents. Therefore, it is necessary to modify the methodology. First, the
search is carried out by keywords. Then, the search for concepts specific to the group of
patents is performed. Finally, the IPC codes where the patents in question can be indexed
is establsihed. In the case of the search for solar energy technologies in ORC applications,
17 IPC codes were not initially in the group of patents selected for the study. Knowing the
scope of a group and its sections is crucial to classifying a patent correctly.
Table 3. Cont.
Advanced knowledge of the groups and subsections where patents can be found in a
particular technology permits the inventor/assignee to know if his development can be
patented. Complementing the patent search through keywords with the help of IPC codes
becomes a valuable tool to obtain accurate results immediately [48].
(temperature up to 70 times more than standard surfaces). The design facilitates rapid
reheating of large volumes of thermal fluid.
are outside the scope of this study. However, it is surprising that only 1.5% of patents
generated in the US are cited in SCI journals [58].
Aristodemou and Tietze [59] posit the existence of nine forward citation-based mea-
sures, which are the most representative indicators of technological impact. The param-
eters are divided into two groups. The first group are the relevant characteristics at the
patent level (citation index, forward citation frequency, generality, influence). The second
group has relevant characteristics regarding the patent portfolio level (current impact
index, Herfindahl–Hirschman index, hindrance index, relative patent position, technol-
ogy strength).
The authors [60], argue that the number of citations of innovation has been used for
decades for empirical economic analysis. They dispute that in 1995 it was likely that a
published patent would offer more information than one issued in 2015. They also suggest
that changes in the patent generation processes and current search methodologies, in many
cases, lead to results indexed as invalid or biased.
Table 4 summarizes the most relevant patents on solar energy technologies in ORC
applications. This allows us to concisely analyze the cited patents and see which ones can be
incorporated into an ongoing investigation; thus enabling the reduction of R&D times and
its benefits. Implementation of the cited patents could improve the performance of an ORC
plant, provide an effective solution for an ongoing project or lay the theoretical foundations
for the development of future studies in the field. The analysis of the patents published
establishes a pattern regarding the trends regarding in developing solar technologies for
ORC applications. Completing registering a patent is a long process, with the elaboration
of technical documentation and administrative mechanisms. However, to reach this step,
the nature of the invention must have been analyzed and detailed beforehand. Patents
are success stories that help technological development at a global level. Using them as
development tools can allow to find new techniques.
Table 4. Cont.
5. Conclusions
This article has analyzed published patents referring to the use of solar energy tech-
nologies in ORC applications. The search engine used to obtain patent data was Google
Patents. The analysis of the patents was obtained after applying the PRISMA method-
ology to obtain the quantity to be analyzed. The findings obtained from this study are
listed below.
• The number of published patents grew gradually from 2010 to 2014 when the max-
imum number of publications was reached. However, as of 2015, there is a slight
downward trend. Starting in 2020, this phenomenon has been accentuated, and so far,
in 2022, the number of published patents is lower than the previous annual averages;
• Two groups of the IPC contain patents related to solar energy technologies in ORC appli-
cations. Group F owns 77% and group Y 23% of the total number of patents, respectively;
• Although groups F and G contain the patents related to the topic of the article, when
performing the search, only part of the IPC codes was indexed. Seventeen IPC
codes that belong to patents related to solar energy technologies in ORC applica-
tions were collected;
• TheUS, WO, and EP were the countries/assignees with the most significant impact
due to the number of citations of their patents. Although a predominant number of
publications come from CN, this indicates that there is a prevailing number of studies
and potential for future development;
• Patents related to Photovoltaic cell technology present the most stable number of
patent publications per year as data;
• Patents that will possibly implement a high-performance theoretical ORC plant
are filed.
Micromachines 2022, 13, 944 15 of 18
Studies to be carried out in the future should focus on the evolution of PVC and
STP technologies, expecting new developments to be improved. These would enable the
identification of new horizons for the development of patents and also the evaluation of
R&D trends to identify in which areas innovations are expected to develop.
Abbreviations
The following abbreviations are used in the manuscript:
References
1. Fu, B.R.; Hsu, S.W.; Lee, Y.R.; Hsieh, J.C.; Chang, C.M.; Liu, C.H. Effect of off-design heat source temperature on heat transfer
characteristics and system performance of a 250-kW organic Rankine cycle system. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2014, 70, 7–12. [CrossRef]
2. Mogee, M.E. Using patent data for technology analysis and planning. Res.-Technol. Manag. 1991, 34, 43–49. [CrossRef]
3. Li, X.; Xie, Q.; Jiang, J.; Zhou, Y.; Huang, L. Identifying and monitoring the development trends of emerging technologies
using patent analysis and Twitter data mining: The case of perovskite solar cell technology. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2019,
146, 687–705. [CrossRef]
4. Janjić, I.; Jovanović, M.; Simonović, Z. The importance of research and development for innovative activity: The overview of the
top countries in Europe and worldwide. Econ. Sustain. Dev. 2021, 5, 19–28. [CrossRef]
5. Hu, J.; Li, S.; Hu, J.; Yang, G. A hierarchical feature extraction model for multi-label mechanical patent classification. Sustainability
2018, 10, 219. [CrossRef]
6. Webb, C.; Dernis, H.; Harhoff, D.; Hoisl, K. Analysing European and international patent citations: A set of EPO patent database
building blocks. OECD Sci. Technol. Ind. Work. Pap. 2005, 9. [CrossRef]
7. Noailly, J.; Shestalova, V. Knowledge spillovers from renewable energy technologies: Lessons from patent citations. Environ.
Innov. Soc. Transit. 2017, 22, 1–14. [CrossRef]
8. Gielen, D.; Boshell, F.; Saygin, D.; Bazilian, M.D.; Wagner, N.; Gorini, R. The role of renewable energy in the global energy
transformation. Energy Strategy Rev. 2019, 24, 38–50. [CrossRef]
9. Eyerer, S.; Dawo, F.; Kaindl, J.; Wieland, C.; Spliethoff, H. Experimental investigation of modern ORC working fluids R1224yd (Z)
and R1233zd (E) as replacements for R245fa. Appl. Energy 2019, 240, 946–963. [CrossRef]
10. Zhu, S.; Zhang, K.; Deng, K. A review of waste heat recovery from the marine engine with highly efficient bottoming power
cycles. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2020, 120, 109611. [CrossRef]
11. Mahmoudi, A.; Fazli, M.; Morad, M. A recent review of waste heat recovery by Organic Rankine Cycle. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2018,
143, 660–675. [CrossRef]
12. Loni, R.; Mahian, O.; Markides, C.N.; Bellos, E.; le Roux, W.G.; Kasaeian, A.; Najafi, G.; Rajaee, F. A review of solar-driven organic
Rankine cycles: Recent challenges and future outlook. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 150, 111410. [CrossRef]
13. Sun, H.; Qin, J.; Yan, P.; Huang, H.; Hung, T.C. Performance evaluation of a partially admitted axial turbine using R245fa, R123
and their mixtures as working fluid for small-scale organic Rankine cycle. Energy Convers. Manag. 2018, 171, 925–935. [CrossRef]
14. Alsagri, A.S. Design and dynamic simulation of a photovoltaic thermal-organic Rankine cycle considering heat transfer between
components. Energy Convers. Manag. 2020, 225, 113435. [CrossRef]
15. Pathak, S.; Shukla, S. A review on the performance of organic rankine cycle with different heat sources and absorption chillers.
Distrib. Gener. Altern. Energy J. 2018, 33, 6–37.
16. Zhao, Y.; Liu, G.; Li, L.; Yang, Q.; Tang, B.; Liu, Y. Expansion devices for organic Rankine cycle (ORC) using in low temperature
heat recovery: A review. Energy Convers. Manag. 2019, 199, 111944. [CrossRef]
17. Gómez Ramírez, J. La energía solar fotovoltaica en Colombia: Potenciales, antecedentes y perspectivas. Repositorio Universidad
Santo Tomás, 2018, Available online: https://repository.usta.edu.co/handle/11634/10312 (accessed on 14 May 2022).
18. IEA. Key World Energy Statistics 2021; IEA: Paris, France, 2021. Available online: https://www.iea.org/reports/key-world-
energy-statistics-2021 (accessed on 14 May 2022).
19. Wang, B.; Wang, Q.; Wei, Y.M.; Li, Z.P. Role of renewable energy in China’s energy security and climate change mitigation: An
index decomposition analysis. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 90, 187–194. [CrossRef]
20. Wang, D.D.; Sueyoshi, T. Climate change mitigation targets set by global firms: Overview and implications for renewable energy.
Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 94, 386–398. [CrossRef]
Micromachines 2022, 13, 944 17 of 18
21. Yu, J.; Tang, Y.M.; Chau, K.Y.; Nazar, R.; Ali, S.; Iqbal, W. Role of solar-based renewable energy in mitigating CO2 emissions:
Evidence from quantile-on-quantile estimation. Renew. Energy 2022, 182, 216–226. [CrossRef]
22. Tiwari, D.; Sherwani, A.F.; Atheaya, D.; Kumar, A.; Kumar, N. Thermodynamic analysis of Organic Rankine cycle driven by
reversed absorber hybrid photovoltaic thermal compound parabolic concentrator system. Renew. Energy 2020, 147, 2118–2127.
[CrossRef]
23. Hu, S.; Yang, Z.; Li, J.; Duan, Y. A Review of Multi-Objective Optimization in Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) System Design.
Energies 2021, 14, 6492. [CrossRef]
24. Şentürk, F.; Gunduz, G. A framework for investigating search engines’ stemming mechanisms: A case study on Bing. Concurr.
Comput. Pract. Exp. 2021, 34, e6562. [CrossRef]
25. Zhu, L.; Xue, P.; Lan, Q.; Meng, G.; Ren, Y.; Yang, Z.; Xu, P.L. Recent research and development status of laser cladding: A review.
Opt. Laser Technol. 2022, 138, 106915. [CrossRef]
26. Hsu, D.H.; Hsu, P.-H.; Zhou, T.; Ziedonis, A.A. Benchmarking US university patent value and commercialization efforts: A new
approach. Res. Policy 2022, 50, 104076. [CrossRef]
27. Fu, B.R.; Hsu, S.W.; Liu, C.H. Trends in patent applications relating to organic Rankine cycle. Procedia Eng. 2014, 79, 249–257.
[CrossRef]
28. Tseng, Y.H.; Lin, C.J.; Lin, Y.I. Text mining techniques for patent analysis. Inf. Process. Manag. 2007, 43, 1216–1247. [CrossRef]
29. Torres-Falcon, M.; Rodríguez-Abreo, O.; Castillo-Velásquez, F.A.; Flores-Rangel, A.; Rodríguez-Reséndiz, J.; Álvarez Alvarado,
J.M. Novel Mathematical Method to Obtain the Optimum Speed and Fuel Reduction in Heavy Diesel Trucks. Energies 2021,
14, 8121. [CrossRef]
30. Moher, D.; Liberati, A.; Tetzlaff, J.; Altman, D.G. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The
PRISMA statement. Ann. Intern. Med. 2009, 151, 264–269. [CrossRef]
31. Spadacini, C.; Rizzi, D. Radial outflow turbines for Organic Rankine Cycle expanders. In Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) Power
Systems; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017; pp. 335–359.
32. Lestari, W.; Yazid, N.H.; Azhar, Z.N.; Ismail, A.; Sukotjo, C. Impact of COVID-19 on Malaysian dental students’ physical, mental,
financial and academic concerns. BMC Oral Health 2022, 22, 46. [CrossRef]
33. Yang, D. A correct validation of the national solar radiation data base (NSRDB). Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 97, 152–155.
[CrossRef]
34. Wagner, C.S.; Park, H.W.; Leydesdorff, L. The continuing growth of global cooperation networks in research: A conundrum for
national governments. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0131816. [CrossRef]
35. Fontelo, P.; Liu, F. A review of recent publication trends from top publishing countries. Syst. Rev. 2018, 7, 1–9. [CrossRef]
36. Fu, B.R.; Hsu, S.W.; Liu, C.H.; Liu, Y.C. Statistical analysis of patent data relating to the organic Rankine cycle. Renew. Sustain.
Energy Rev. 2014, 39, 986–994. [CrossRef]
37. Martínez, C. Patent families: When do different definitions really matter? Scientometrics 2011, 86, 39–63. [CrossRef]
38. International Patent Documentation. INPADOC Extended Patent Family. 2022. Available online: https://www.epo.org/
searching-for-patents/helpful-resources/first-time-here/patent-families/inpadoc.html (accessed on 14 May 2022).
39. World Intellectual Property Organization Strasbourg Agreement Concerning the International Patent Classification. 2021.
Available online: https://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/classification/strasbourg/ (accessed on 14 May 2022).
40. International Patent Classification About the International Patent Classification. 2022. Available online: https://www.
wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo-guide-ipc-2022-en-guide-to-the-international-patent-classification-2022.pdf (accessed on 14
May 2022).
41. European Patent Office Cooperative Patent Classification. 2022. Available online: https://ipcpub.wipo.int/?notion=scheme&
version=20220101&\symbol=none&menulang=en&lang=en&viewmode=f&fipcpc=no&\showdeleted=yes&indexes=no&
headings=yes¬es=yes&direction=o2n&initial=A&cwid=none&tree=no&searchmode=smart (accessed on 14 May 2022).
42. Leydesdorff, L.; Kogler, D.F.; Yan, B. Mapping patent classifications: portfolio and statistical analysis, and the comparison of
strengths and weaknesses. Scientometrics 2017, 112, 1573–1591. [CrossRef]
43. Tran, T.; Kavuluru, R. Supervised approaches to assign cooperative patent classification (cpc) codes to patents. In Proceedings
of the International Conference on Mining Intelligence and Knowledge Exploration, Hyderabad, India, 13–15 December 2017;
Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2017; pp. 22–34.
44. Montecchi, T.; Russo, D.; Liu, Y. Searching in Cooperative Patent Classification: Comparison between keyword and concept-based
search. Adv. Eng. Inform. 2013, 27, 335–345. [CrossRef]
45. Evangelisti, L.; Vollaro, R.D.L.; Asdrubali, F. Latest advances on solar thermal collectors: A comprehensive review. Renew. Sustain.
Energy Rev. 2019, 114, 109318. [CrossRef]
46. Hosseini, S.E.; Wahid, M.A.; Aghili, N. The scenario of greenhouse gases reduction in Malaysia. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2013,
28, 400–409. [CrossRef]
47. Dechezleprêtre, A.; Glachant, M.; Ménière, Y. What drives the international transfer of climate change mitigation technologies?
Empirical evidence from patent data. Environ. Resour. Econ. 2013, 54, 161–178. [CrossRef]
48. Sharma, P.; Tripathi, R. Patent citation: A technique for measuring the knowledge flow of information and innovation. World Pat.
Inf. 2017, 51, 31–42. [CrossRef]
Micromachines 2022, 13, 944 18 of 18
49. Lydick, T. Renewable Energy Utilizing Closed Cycle Thermodynamic Based Engine and Method of Operation. U.S. Patent
20190211808A1, 11 February 2019.
50. Souza, C.C.D. Reflective Parabolic Gutter Compensated and Solar Concentrator in Longitudinal Greehouse Box for Quick
Reheating of Circulating Thermal Fluid, Utilizable and Stockable in Medium Temperatures, Intended for the Production of Hot
Water and/or Vegetable Water. Brasil Patent BR 102019018483A2, 5 September 2019.
51. Lou, Z.; Li, D. Biomass Energy-Tower Type Solar Energy Coupling Power Generation System Based on Organic Rankine Cycle.
China Patent CN 113074094A, 21 March 2021.
52. Walker, J.D. Polar-Linear-Fresnel-Concentrating Solar-Thermal Power and Desalination Plant. U.S. Patent 10987609B1, 18
November 2020.
53. Mark Gerard Anderson, R.P. System and Method for Solar Panel Heat Energy Recovery, Heat Energy Storage and Generation
from the Stored Heat Energy. U.S. Patent 2020036755A1, 1 November 2021.
54. Chang, Y.; Lau, T.K.; Pan, M.A.; Lu, X.; Yan, H.; Zhan, C. The synergy of host–guest nonfullerene acceptors enables 16%-efficiency
polymer solar cells with increased open-circuit voltage and fill-factor. Mater. Horizons 2019, 6, 2094–2102. [CrossRef]
55. Trajtenberg, M. A penny for your quotes: patent citations and the value of innovations. Rand J. Econ. 1990 , 21, 172–187. [CrossRef]
56. Harhoff, D.; Narin, F.; Scherer, F.M.; Vopel, K. Citation frequency and the value of patented inventions. Rev. Econ. Stat. 1999,
81, 511–515. [CrossRef]
57. Moser, P.; Ohmstedt, J.; Rhode, P.W. Patent citations—An analysis of quality differences and citing practices in hybrid corn.
Manag. Sci. 2018, 64, 1926–1940. [CrossRef]
58. Glänzel, W.; Meyer, M. Patents cited in the scientific literature: An exploratory study of’reverse’citation relations. Scientometrics
2003, 58, 415–428. [CrossRef]
59. Aristodemou, L.; Tietze, F. Citations as a measure of technological impact: A review of forward citation-based measures. World
Pat. Inf. 2018, 53, 39–44. [CrossRef]
60. Kim, J.; Jeong, B.; Kim, D. Patent Citations Analysis. In Patent Analytics; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2021; pp. 73–82.
61. Falcey, J. Hybrid Solar/Non-Solar Energy Generation System and Method. U.S. Patent 2013059112A1, 2 March 2014.
62. Ji, J.; Li, J. Heat Pipe Type Solar Energy ORC (Organic Rankine Cycle) Low-Temperature Thermal Power Generating System.
China Patent CN 101761461B, 30 May 2012.
63. Baskara Kosamana, Joydeep Choduri, Arunachalam Chetiyar, Saravanaram Tee, Rakesh Gobindasami Organic Rankine Cycle for
Concentrated Solar Power System. Korea Patent 20140015422A, 6 February 2014.
64. Bhaskara Kosamana, S.M. Organic Rankine Cycle for Concentrated Solar Power System with Saturated Liquid Storage and
Method. Mexico Patent MX 2013011348A, 13 January 2013.
65. Zhang, Y.; Zhang, G. Solar Photothermal Combined Power Generation System. China Patent CN 106321382A, 24 May 2017.
66. Dharendra Yogi, G.; Elias Stefanakos, N.G. Integrated Cascading Cycle Solar Thermal Plants. U.S. Patent 10690121B2, 31
October 2012.
67. Aveek ChatterjeeOliver Gerhard MayerJoerg Hermann StrombergerClarissa Sara Katharina Belloni A Hybrid Photovoltaic
System and Method Thereof. European Patent Office Patent EP 2398070A2, 21 December 2011.
68. Jeter, D.W. Hybrid Thermal Power and Desalination Apparatus and Methods. U.S. Patent 9932970B1, 4 December 2017.
69. Ma, Z.; S. Turchi Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Power Cycle Configuration for Use in Concentrating Solar Power Systems. U.S.
Patent 20120216536A1, 16 February 2012.
70. Lucien, Y.; Bronicki, J.S. Solar Power Plant. U.S. Patent 8661778B2, 11 February 2013.
71. Dearman, P.T. Renewable Energy Storage System. European Patent Office Patent EP 2836769A2, 6 March 2013.
72. Gilad AlmogyRatson MoradMatthew Dean GOODYEARMani Thothadri Photovoltaic-Thermal Solar Energy Collection System
with Energy storage. U.S. Patent 20160156309A1, 10 January 2016.
73. Koichi GotoNobuo OkitaKazuo TakahataMasahiko Takahashi Steam Turbine Plant. European Patent Office Patent EP 2846008B1,
10 January 2018.
74. Keith Sterling Johnson, C.J. Organic Rankine Cycle Decompression Heat Engine. U.S. Patent 10400635B2, 24 July 2017.
75. Aveek ChatterjeeAditya BhaktaSampa GhoshRakesh GOVINDASAMYDevanathan Krishnan Hybrid Solar Concentration Device.
European Patent Office Patent EP 2518781A2, 24 April 2012.
76. Mazri, K.E. Hydroelectric Solar Tower with Ponctual Concentration. France Patent FR 3025593A1, 4 September 2014.
77. Masahide Umaya,Masato Ota, Naoyuki Nagafuchi, Tadaharu Kishibe, Takahiro Marumoto, Masato Kurita Solar Thermal Power
Generation Facility. U.S. Patent 11060424B2, 13 July 2021. .
78. Sten Kreuger Thermal Energy Storage and Retrieval Systems. U.S. Patent 9845998B2, 19 December 2017.
79. Palaios, C.X. Methods and Compositions for the Organic Rankine Cycle to Generate Mechanical Energy from Heat. Japan Patent
JP 6800942B2, 16 December 2020.
80. Nell Krishnan, G.T. Solar Power Collection Systems and Methods Thereof. Japan Patent JP 2020203012A1, 3 February 2020.
81. Wan, Z.; Chen, W.; Cai, W.; Tao, W.X. Improved Steam Turbine Set Variable-Pressure Operation Consumption Difference
Quantitative Calculation Model Construction Method. China Patent CN 111737859A, 2 October 2020.