T Value
T Value
3.0 INTRODUCTION
In psychology some times we are interested in research questions like Do the
AIDS patients who are given the drug AZT show higher T-4 blood cell counts
than patients who are not given that drug? Is the error rate of typist the same
when work is done in a noisy environment as in a quiet one? Whether lecture
method of teaching is more effective than lecture cum discussion method?
3.1 OBJECTIVES
After reading this unit, you will be able to:
Understand the need and importance of the significance of the difference
between means;
Know about what is null hypothesis, standard error, degrees of freedom,
level of significance, two tailed and one tailed test of significance, type I
error and type II error; and
Calculate the significance of difference between mean ( t-test) when
groups are independent, when there are correlated groups, groups matched
by pair and groups matched by mean and standard deviation.
Let us take the first question on linguistic ability of boys and girls. First we
randomly select a large sample of boys and girls (large sample means the
group comprises of 30 or more than 30 persons.). Then we administer a
battery of verbal test to measure the linguistic ability of the two groups,
compute the mean scores on linguistic ability test of the two groups. Let us
say the obtained mean scores for boys and girls are M1 and M2. Now we try to
find the difference between the two means. If we get a large difference(M1 –
M2) in favour of the girls then we can confidently say that girls of 10 years of
age are significantly more able linguistically than 10 years old boys. On the
contrary if we find small difference between two means then we would
conclude that ten years old girls and boys do not differ in linguistic ability.
35
Significance of An obtained mean is influenced by sampling fluctuation or error of sampling S
the Difference and whatever differences are obtained in the means, it may be due to this di
of Frequency sampling error. Even mean of population 1 and mean of the population 2 may
be the same but because of sampling error we may find the difference in the
range of 2 samples drawn from two populations. In order to test the
significance of an obtained difference we must first have a standard error(SE)
of the difference. Then from the difference between the sample mean and
standard error of difference we can say whether the difference is significant or
not. Now the question arises what do we mean by significant difference?
According to Garrett (1981) a difference is called significant when the
probability is high and that it cannot be attributed to chance that is
(Temporary and accidental factors) and hence represent a true difference
between population mean.
In social sciences .05 and .01 level of significance are most often used. When
we decide to use .05 or 5% level of significance for rejecting a null hypothesis
it means that the chances are 95 out of 100 that is not true and only 5 chances
out of 100 the difference is a true difference.
In certain types of data, the researcher may prefer to make it more exact and
use .01 or 1% level of significance. If hypothesis is rejected at this level it
shows the chances are 99 out of 100 that the hypothesis is not true and only 1
chance out of 100 it is true. The level of significance which the researcher will
accept should be set by researcher before collecting the data.
A Type I error, also known as alpha error, is committed when null hypothesis
(Ho) is rejected when in fact it is true.
A Type II error, also known as beta error, is committed when null hypothesis
is retained and in fact it is not true. For example suppose that the difference
between two population means (µ1- µ2) is actually zero, and if our test of
significance when applied to the sample mean shows that the difference in
population mean is significant we make a Type I error. On the other hand if
there is true difference between two population mean, and our test of
significance based on the sample mean shows that the difference in population
mean is “ not significant‟ we commit a type II error.
Scores of Scores of
boys girls
X1 x1 x² X2 x2 x2²
28 -2 4 20 -4 16
35 5 25 16 -8 64
32 2 4 25 1 1
24 -6 36 34 10 100
36 -4 16 20 -4 16
35 5 25 28 4 16
31 7 49
24 0 0
27 3 9
15 -9 81
Calculation
M1=(∑X1/N1)
M1=180/6 =30
M2=(∑X2 / N2)
M1=240/10 =24
SD= √ [( ∑x21+∑x22)/(N1-1)+(N2-1)]
SD = √ [( 110+352)/(6-1)+(10-1)] = 5.74
SEd= SD [√( (N1+N2)/(N1N2)]
= 5.74 / √ [ (16)/(60)]
= 5.74 × .5164 = 2.96
t= (M1-M2)-0/SED
= (30-20)-0/2.96 = 2.03
df=(N1-1)+(N2-1)
df=(6-1)+(10-1) =14 39
Significance of Entering the value in table on 14 d.f. We get 2.14 at the .05 and 2.98 at the.01 S
the Difference level, since our t is less than 2.14, therefore we will say that the mean di
of Frequency difference between boys and girls is non significant.
Let us take another example
Example
On an academic achievement test 31 girls and 42 boys obtained the following
scores.
Table: Mean scores and Standard deviation
Mean SD N df
Boys 40.39 8.69 31 30
Girls 35.81 8.33 42 41
Is the mean difference in favour of boys and significant at the .05 level.
First we will compute the pooled standard deviation by the following formula
SD = √ [(SD1)2 × (N1-1) + (SD2)2 × (N2-1)]/(N1+N2)
SD1= Standard Deviation of group 1 i.e. 8.69
N1= Number of subject is group 1 i.e. 31
SD2= Standard devotion of groups 2 i.e. 8.33
N2= Number of subject in group 2 i.e. 42
SD = [(8.69)2 × (31-1)+(8.33)2 × (42-1)/(N1-1)+(N2-1)]
SED= SD [( (N1+N2)/(N1N2)]
SED= 8.48 [(31+42)/(31X42)]
t= (M1-M2)-0/SED
= (40.39-35.81)-0/2.01 = 2.28
df=(N1-1)+(N2-1)
df=(31-1)+(42-1) =71
Entering Table with 71 df we find t entries of 2.00 at the .05 level and 2.65 at
the .01 level. The obtained t of 2.28 is significant at .05 level but not at the .01
level. We may say boys academic achievement is better in comparison to that
girls.
42
f 3.5.3 The Method of Equivalent Groups Significance of the
e differences between
In experiments when we want to compare the relative effect of one method of Means (T-Value)
treatment over another we generally take two groups, one is known as
experimental group and the other is known as control group. Here we have
two groups not a single group. For the desired results these two groups need to
be made equivalent. This can be done by (i) Matched pair technique or (ii)
Matched groups technique. These are explained below
i) Matched pair technique: In this techniques matching is done by pair.
Matching is done on variables which are going to affect the results of the
study like age, intelligence, interest, socio-economic status.
ii) Matched groups technique: In this technique instead of person to person
matching, matching of groups is carried out in terms of Mean and S.D.
3.5.4 Matching by Pair
Formula for calculation of standard error of difference between mean is:
SED or σD = [σ2M1+ σ2M2- 2r σM1 σM2] . Here
σ2M1= Standard error of mean 1
σ2M2= Standard error of mean 2
r=correlation between the two groups scores
t = ( M1-M2 )-0 /SED
Example
Two groups X and Y of Children 72 in each group are paired child to child for
age and intelligence. Both groups were given group intelligence scale and scores
were obtained. After three weeks experimental group subjects were praised for
their performance and urged to try better. The control groups did not get the
incentive. Group intelligence scale again was administered on the groups. The
data obtained were as follows. Did the praise affect the performance of the group
or is there a significant difference between the two groups.
Table:
Experimental Control group
group
No. of children in each group 72 72
Mean score of final test 88.63 83.24
SD of final test 24.36 21.62
Standard error of the mean of 2.89 2.57
final test
Correlation between experimental .65
and control group scores
SED or σD = [σ2M1+ σ2M2- 2r σM1 σM2]
SED or σD = [( (2.89)2+(2.57)2-2x.65x 2.89x2.57]
= 2.30
t= (88.63-83.24)-0/2.30=2.34
d.f. = 72-1= 71
43
Significance of If we see the table we find that at 71 d.f. the value at .05 is 2.00 and at .01 is S
the Difference 2.65. The obtained t is 2.34 therefore this value is significant at .05 level and di
of Frequency not at .01 level. On the basis of the results is can be said that praise did have
significant effect in stimulating the performance of children.
46
f Significance of the
e differences between
Is the difference between the means of two groups significant at o.05 level? Means (T-Value)
3.8 GLOSSARY
Null Hypothesis : A zero difference hypothesis. A statement about
the status Quo about a population parameter that
is being tested.
Alternative Hypotheses: A hypothesis that takes a value of population
parameter different from that used in the null
hypothesis. It states that there is a difference in
the groups on a certain characteristic that is being
tested.
Type I error : An error caused by rejecting a null hypothesis
when it is true.
Type II : An error caused by failing to reject a null
hypotheses when it is not true.
One tail test : A statistical hypothesis test in which the
alternative hypothesis is specified such that only
one direction of the possible distribution of
values is considered. It would state there will be
an increase in the performance of students after
training.
Two tailed Test : A statistical hypothesis test in which the
alternative hypothesis is stated in such way that it
included both the higher and the lower values of a
parameter than the value specified in the null
hypothesis, It would state that there will be a
difference (can be an increase or decrease) in the
group that undergoes training.
Significance level : The probability that a given difference arises
because of a chance factor or it is a true
difference.
Standard error : The standard deviation of a sampling
distributions. 47
Significance of S
the Difference
3.9 LIST OF FORMULA di
of Frequency t test for two independent group
t= (M1-M2)-0/SED
SED= SD/√ (1/N1+1/N2)
SD = √(Σx12+ Σx22)/(N1-1)+(N2-1)
t-test for single group (difference method)
Mean = (∑D)/N
SDD= √ [(∑x2)/N-1]
SEMD= SDD/ √(N)
t= MD-0/SEMD
t –test for groups matched for mean and S.D
t = (M1-M2)/ SED
SED or σD = [(σ2M1+ σ2M2 )( 1-r2)]
t –test for groups matched for paired
SED or σD = [σ2M1+ σ2M2- 2r σM1 σM2]
t= (M1-M2)-0/SED
48