Temario
Temario
Instructor: Marc Eagle Office: Cherry Hall 238 (inside Suite 234)
Email: [email protected] Office Hours: Email for appointment (via Zoom)
Phone: (270) 745-7026
Course Description
This reading-intensive online graduate course will sample a wide variety of targeted thematic readings related to
the history of Latin America from the conquest era to the present day; themes for this semester include the
conquest of Spanish and Portuguese America, colonial society, independence and its aftermath, nineteenth-
century problems, the Cold War, and the legacies of the past. The aim of this class is not to teach students about
all areas and time periods of Latin American history, but rather to teach them how to effectively learn about
Latin America. Students are not expected to have a background in Latin American history, but through regular
weekly discussion posts, short assignments, and written essays will closely examine arguments and trends in
recent scholarly writing and consider the ways in which the region and its peoples, cultures, and politics have
been analyzed. In doing so, they will practice critical reading and writing skills appropriate to the discipline of
History at the graduate level. Students will also carry out a guided research or teaching project over the semester
that will enable them to develop a deeper understanding of a specific area of focus within the broad sweep of
over 500 years of Latin American history.
Course Objectives
Since this course is a graduate reading seminar, we will concentrate on discussing and analyzing secondary
scholarship related to Latin America, rather than on primary material. By the end of the semester, students in
this course should be able to:
- Identify, discuss, and assess recent trends, and debates within selected topics related to Latin American history,
in order to prepare for graduate examinations, further research, or teaching.
- Evaluate arguments and assumptions in a wide range of scholarly literature related to Latin America from 1500
to the present day.
- Demonstrate graduate-level research skills on a project designed by student in consultation with instructor.
- Develop, practice, and refine graduate-level analytical and writing skills in online discussion, short abstracts
and essays, and a focused research project in preparation for teaching and research at the professional level.
Course Texts
There are no required books to purchase for this class, since all required reading materials will either be posted
on Blackboard or be available online through WKU’s library. However, students may need to purchase books
for their research project. All students should expect to read roughly 5-10 research articles, or the equivalent of a
scholarly book, each week in this class. See the projected reading schedule at the end of this syllabus for a sense
of what the weekly reading looks like (not including individual readings for the research or teaching project).
Course Expectations
2
Even though this is an online graduate course, students should not expect that it will be less demanding than a
traditional face-to-face graduate course. Keeping up with the material is essential to doing well in this course,
which will require a considerable amount of reading and regular, active participation on the discussion forums
every week. Online courses generally require more self-discipline than face-to-face courses, since you will need
to take responsibility for structuring your time effectively and meeting all deadlines in the absence of physical
meetings.
With that in mind, students should expect to spend at the very least 10-15 hours per week on this course, and
more if you are a slow reader or writer. While the material in much of our reading may be unfamiliar to many of
you, this should not be a problem as long as you are willing to read carefully, and I will often supply necessary
contextual information to help you through it. However, be sure that you are prepared for a graduate-level
workload before beginning this course; if you fall behind for even one week it will be very difficult to catch up,
and this is probably the surest way to do badly in or even fail the course. Students who do not attend the course
within the first week will be automatically dropped. None of this is meant to intimidate you, but rather to
encourage you to be honest with yourself about the level of time management that is necessary to do well in this
course. If you do run into problems during the semester, be sure to talk to me as soon as possible, since I would
very much like to see everyone succeed.
Your workload for a typical week in this course will include reading around 5-10 articles or book chapters, and
sometimes other kinds of written material (not including the reading you will need to do for your individual
research or teaching project). At several times during the week, you will also make a number of thoughtful
discussion forum posts and respond to other students’ posts; it is best to think of these as short writing
assignments, since they will require substantial time and effort. Most weeks, you will also have reading abstracts
and map notes to complete. There will be a written midterm essay assignment, along with the research or
teaching project you will complete over the course of the semester; we will not have a separate final exam in this
class.
For this online class, you will need access to a computer with a reliable internet connection in order to use
Blackboard and view short videos, and to write and submit your assignments. You should also have a plan for
an alternate way to connect to the internet (e.g. a public library or coffee shop with wireless access) in case of
emergency; I strongly encourage you to keep backups of your work as well (for the discussion boards in
particular, it is a very good idea to compose your posts offline and then copy and paste them into Blackboard). If
you are unfamiliar with Blackboard, visit the Online Orientation for Online Learners at
http://www.wku.edu/online/orientation/index.php before the course begins. If you have technical questions or
problems, please let me know as soon as possible and I will do my best to help.
Note that email is the best way to get in touch with me, and you can generally expect a response within 24
hours. All email needs to be from your official WKU address (not Gmail, for example), which is also where I
will send regular emailed announcements (so be sure to check that email address regularly each week).
Grading
Grades will be based on the following criteria:
10%: Participation
30%: Weekly discussion posts and short assignments
15%: Reading abstracts
15%: Synthetic essay/midterm exam
30%: Research project
Coursework
Participation: Your participation grade for this course will reflect the quality of your posts and interactions with
others on the discussion board, as well as your overall level of engagement with the course material over the
course of the semester.
3
Discussion posts: I will create a new discussion forum each week, for a total of 15 over the semester. Check the
guidelines on each week’s discussion forum, but in general students must make at least four posts during the
week, including two original posts and two responses to other students; you are strongly encouraged to go
beyond these minimum requirements. The weekly forum will open at 8:00 am (these are all in Central Time; let
me know if you are in a different time zone and need to make adjustments to deadlines, which I will happily do)
on Monday and close at 5:00 pm on Sunday. You need to make these posts both before and after Wednesday at
noon, and should not post more than twice per day, allowing at least an hour between your posts, in order to
make sure that you are regularly and thoughtfully interacting with the discussion board and each other during
the week and that all students have a chance to participate equally.
The discussion board is the central part of this class, and you should plan on scheduling regular times during the
week for reading and writing posts. As this is a graduate course, I expect graduate-level work on the discussion
board, meaning thoughtful posts that demonstrate you have read our material (and your fellow students’ posts)
carefully. Things to avoid include: simply restating the reading or your fellow students’ posts, giving your
feelings instead of thinking critically about our reading (try to avoid overusing “I”), making low-effort and
irrelevant comparisons instead of demonstrating an effort to understand the material on its own, relying on
generalizations instead of using specific references to parts of our sources, or waiting until the very last minute
to make most of your posts (ensuring that most other students will not read them). Instead, I want you to discuss
such things as the arguments made by the author, the kinds of sources being used, the major points made by the
author, the author’s stated relationship to earlier scholarship on the topic, important assumptions the author is
making, and what the author’s work contributes to our understanding of some aspect of Latin American history
(note that I will often provide more specific guidance on what to look for each week). As you do so, you should
make the source of the material you are discussing clear. For the discussion boards, the author’s name and page
numbers are usually sufficient. As the week progresses, we will typically shift toward increased discussion of
how our sources relate to each other and to sources from previous weeks. Your discussion grade will be based
on how well you follow these guidelines, as well as how well you interact with each other to show that you are
trying to understand the material and its context.
Map pins: Every week, I also want students to make a custom map pin on our shared Google Map (I will post a
video on how to do this), identifying and briefly describing a place in Latin America listed in our weekly
reading, whether it is a small town, a major city, or a country, to help you orient yourself in the region and think
about the places we are learning about. Each pin should be for a different place, so you will need to read
carefully and pay attention to which places other students have already marked (there should be *plenty* of
places to choose from in each week’s reading). This semester’s map is at:
https://www.google.com/maps/d/u/0/edit?mid=1hjcwdXv8sVD0Aat8b6L7owZZ5mvwCD4&usp=sharing
We may also have other short, informal assignments during the semester; I will announce them on Blackboard.
Reading abstracts: At least 8 of the 15 weeks this semester, students will write a short (roughly 3-page)
analytical summary of the reading for that week following the guidelines posted on Blackboard, to demonstrate
your understanding of this reading. All students are required to write an abstract for weeks 2, 3, and 4 and then
can choose at least 5 other weeks over the rest of the semester, for a total of 8. I will count the best 8 abstracts,
so you may write more to raise this part of your grade.
Synthetic essay/midterm exam: During week 7, we will take a break from reading and you will instead have a
take-home exam, to demonstrate that you can make connections among the material we have covered in the
preceding weeks (which will also help make sure you are ready to do well on your research project).
Research project: Over the course of the semester, all students will create and carry out an individual research
project in consultation with me. Students can choose three main options: a primary-source based research
project, a detailed historiographical essay, or a teaching project, all of which will require an equal level of effort
4
(although there is no specific page limit, it will be similar to that involved for a 12- to 15-page research paper).
Students will be able to choose a specific area of focus (which may be constrained by the availability of suitable
primary or secondary sources in English) and must meet several milestones during the course of the semester,
including a project abstract, a preliminary outline and bibliography, and a full rough draft; they will also reflect
on or present their project to the other students. The final project will be due at the end of the last week of
classes.
Generally speaking, you should try to avoid simply restating your sources, whether they are published works or
another student’s discussion post. Briefly quoting or paraphrasing is usually acceptable when necessary as long
as you provide a citation, but just repeating someone else’s words does not demonstrate understanding. It is
much better to refer briefly to an idea or argument in a source in your own words, and then explain your
thoughts in your own words; this will not only earn you a better grade but also allow you to practice and refine
skills necessary for doing history at the graduate level.
Other Policies
Missing deadlines will lower your grade on each assignment. My intent is to encourage professional behavior
rather than punish you arbitrarily, so if you end up needing a short extension, please contact me to let me know
as soon as possible. If you run into larger problems this semester that make it difficult to complete your work,
please do let me know – I don’t need to know the details of your private life, but I would very much like to see
all students do well in this class, and it is much more likely that we can make arrangements for you to complete
the coursework if you contact me as soon as possible rather than waiting until several weeks have gone by.
Any students with special needs should contact the Office for Student Disability Services in DSU 1074 (tel. 745-
5004/TDD 745-3030) as soon as possible after the start of the semester to request a letter of accommodation,
which I will be happy to honor. Once more, I genuinely want to see all students do well in this course, so if other
problems arise during the course of the semester, please let me know as soon as you can instead of waiting until
after you have missed coursework.
Students are always welcome to contact me (email is usually best) to arrange a Zoom meeting, especially if you
are having any difficulties in this class. I am also more than happy to look over a draft version of your written
assignments before they are due.
Reading Schedule
NOTE: This reading schedule will very likely be updated as the semester progresses; I will notify you
when a new version of the schedule/syllabus is available on Blackboard.
Choose at least 3:
• Sarah Albiez-Wieck, "Indigenous migrants negotiating belonging: Peticiones de cambio de fuero in
Cajamarca, Peru, 17th–18th centuries," Colonial Latin American Review 26, no. 4 (2017): 483-508
(26 pp.)
7
• Norah Andrews, "Calidad, Genealogy, and Disputed Free-colored Tributary Status in New Spain," The
Americas 73, no. 2 (April 2016): 139-170 (32 pp.)
• Bruce A. Castleman, "Social Climbers in a Colonial Mexican City: Individual Mobility within the Sistema
de Castas in Orizaba, 1777-1791," Colonial Latin American Review 10, no. 2 (2001): 229-249 (21 pp.)
• Jorge E. Delgadillo Núñez, "The Workings of Calidad: Honor, Governance, and Social Hierarchies in the
Corporations of the Spanish Empire," The Americas 76, no. 2 (April 2019): 215-239 (25 pp.)
• Karen Y. Morrison, "Slave Mothers and White Fathers: Defining Family and Status in Late Colonial
Cuba," Slavery and Abolition 31, no. 1 (March 2010): 29-55 (27 pp.)
• Frank "Trey" Proctor III, "Amores perritos: Puppies, Laughter and Popular Catholicism in Bourbon
Mexico City," Journal of Latin American Studies 46, no. 1 (2014): 1-28 (28 pp.)
• Ana E. Schaposchnik, "The dungeons of the Lima Inquisition: corruption, survival, and secret codes in
colonial Peru," Colonial Latin American Review 29, no. 3 (2020): 398-413 (16 pp.)
• Tamara J. Walker, "‘Blanconas Sucias’ and ‘Putas Putonas’: White Women, Cross-Caste Conflict and the
Power of Words in Late-Colonial Lima, Peru," Gender & History 27, no. 1 (April 2015): 131-150 (20
pp.)
• Luis Enrique Pedauga, Lucien David Pedauga and Blanca L. Delgado-Márquez, "Relationships between
corruption, political orientation, and income inequality: evidence from Latin America," Applied
Economics 49, no. 17 (2017): 1689-1705 (17 pp.)
• Alfonso W. Quiroz, "Implicit Costs of Empire: Bureaucratic Corruption in Nineteenth-Century Cuba,"
Journal of Latin American Studies 35 (2003): 473-511 (39 pp.)
• Perry Stein, "FBI arrests former Puerto Rico governor on bribery charges," Washington Post, August 4,
2022, https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2022/08/04/vzquez-garced-puerto-rico-
bribery/ (2 pp.)
• Barney Warf & Sheridan Stewart, "Latin American Corruption in Geographic Perspective," Journal of
Latin American Geography 15, no. 1 (March 2016): 133-155 (23 pp.)