The document discusses elements of image interpretation for landform identification and evaluation including topography, drainage patterns, erosion features, image tone, and vegetation. It describes different types of drainage patterns such as dendritic, trellis, and radial that form based on the underlying geology. Characteristics of erosion features like gullies are also outlined. The role of these elements in the image interpretation process for identifying terrain conditions is explained.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
23 views6 pages
Factors of Terrain Interpretation
The document discusses elements of image interpretation for landform identification and evaluation including topography, drainage patterns, erosion features, image tone, and vegetation. It describes different types of drainage patterns such as dendritic, trellis, and radial that form based on the underlying geology. Characteristics of erosion features like gullies are also outlined. The role of these elements in the image interpretation process for identifying terrain conditions is explained.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6
Elements of Image Interpretation for Landform Identification and Evaluation
Image interpretation for landform identification and evaluation is based on a systematic
observation and evaluation of key elements that are studied stereoscopically. These are topography, drainage pattern and texture, erosion, image tone, and vegetation and land use. Topography Each landform and bedrock type described here has its own characteristic topographic form, including a typical size and shape. In fact, there is often a distinct topographic change at the boundary between two different landforms. With vertical photographs having a normal 60% overlap, most individuals see the terrain exaggerated in height about four times. Consequently, slopes appear steeper than they actually are. The specific amount of vertical exaggeration observed in any given stereopair is a function of the geometric conditions under which the photographs are viewed and taken. Drainage Pattern and Texture The drainage pattern and texture seen on aerial and space images are indicators of landform and bedrock type and also suggest soil characteristics and site drainage conditions. Six of the most common drainage patterns are illustrated in Figure 8.34. Dendritic drainage pattern This is the most common pattern. This type of drainage pattern is characterized by irregular branching of tributary streams flowing in many directions (looks like the branching of a tree) and at almost any angles, although usually at less than a right angle (less than 90 degrees). Such a pattern develops upon homogeneous rocks of uniform resistance to weathering and demonstrates lack of structural control. Dendritic drainage patterns are mostly found upon nearly horizontal sedimentary rocks or in areas of massive igneous rocks. Trellis drainage pattern This patterns look similar to the common garden trellis. It consists of streams having one dominant direction while the short subsequent streams meet the main stream at right angles. This occurs in areas of tilted or folded sedimentary rocks. synclines form valleys in which resides the main channel of the stream. Short tributary streams enter the main channel at sharp angles as they run down sides of parallel ridges called anticlines. Rectangular drainage pattern The rectangular drainage pattern is formed basically when the main stream bends at right angles and the tributaries join the main stream at right angles creating rectangular patterns. It occurs where streams are guided by intersecting joints, usually in plutonic or metamorphic rocks. It is characterized by right- angled bends and right-angled junctions between tributaries and the principal stream. It results from the structural control imposed by the jointing or fault pattern of the underlying rocks. It differs from trellis pattern drainage, since it is more irregular and its tributary streams are not as long or as parallel as in trellis drainage. Radial drainage pattern The radial drainage pattern is formed by streams that radiate outward from a central area as is typical of volcanoes and domes. centripetal drainage pattern The centripetal drainage pattern is the reverse of the radial drainage pattern (drainage is directed toward a central point). The streams converge from all sides in the low lying basins. Such patterns are found on areas of limestone sinkholes, craters and other basin-like depressions. Deranged drainage pattern It represents a drainage pattern which has no clear geometry in the drainage and no true river valley pattern. This uncoordinated pattern is characteristic of a region that has been recently vacated by an ice-sheet. It is a disordered pattern of aimlessly directed short streams, ponds, and wetland areas typical of ablation glacial till areas. Drainage texture Coupled with drainage pattern is drainage texture. Figure 8.35 shows coarse textured and fine- textured drainage patterns. Coarse-textured patterns develop where the soils and rocks have good internal drainage with little surface runoff. Fine-textured patterns develop where the soils and rocks have poor internal drainage and high surface runoff. Also, fine-textured drainage patterns develop on soft, easily eroded rocks, such as shale, whereas coarse-textured patterns develop on hard, massive rocks, such as granite. Erosion Gullies are small drainage features that may be as small as a meter wide and a hundred meters long. Gullies result from the erosion of unconsolidated material by runoff and develop where rainfall cannot adequately percolate into the ground but instead collects and flows across the surface in small rivulets. These initial rivulets enlarge and take on a particular shape characteristic of the material in which they are formed. As illustrated in Figures 8.36 and 8.37, short gullies with V-shaped cross sections tend to develop in sand and gravel; gullies with U-shaped cross sections tend to develop in silty soils; and long gullies with gently rounded cross sections tend to develop in silty clay and clay soils. Image Tone The term image tone refers to the “brightness” at any point on an aerial or space image. The absolute value of the image tone depends not only on terrain characteristics but also on image acquisition factors such as choice of spectral bands and filters, exposure, and image processing. Image tone also depends on meteorological and climatological factors such as atmospheric haze, sun angle, and cloud shadows. Because of the effect of these non-terrain-related factors, image interpretation for terrain evaluation must rely on an analysis of relative tone values, rather than absolute tone values. Relative tone values are important because they often form distinct image patterns that may be of great significance in image interpretation. The effect of terrain conditions on relative image tone can be seen in Figure 8.37c. In the case of bare soils (nonvegetated soils), the lighter toned areas tend to have a topographically higher position, a coarser soil texture, a lower soil moisture content, and a lower organic content. Figure 8.37c shows a striking tonal pattern often seen on fine-textured glacial till soils. The tonal differences are caused by differences in sunlight reflection due principally to the varying moisture content of the soil. The lighter toned areas are somewhat poorly drained silt loam soils on rises to 1 m above the surrounding darker toned areas of very poorly drained silty clay loam soils. The degree of contrast between lighter and darker toned bare soils varies depending on the overall moisture conditions of the soil, as illustrated in Plate 36. The sharpness of the boundary between lighter and darker toned areas is often related to the soil texture. Coarser textured soils will generally have sharper gradations between light and dark tones while finer textured soils will generally have more gradual gradations. These variations in tonal gradients result from differences in capillary action occurring in soils of different textures. Our discussion of image interpretation for terrain evaluation relates primarily to the use of panchromatic imagery because this image type has historically received the most use for this purpose. Subtle differences in soil and rock colors can be detected using multiple bands in the visible part of the spectrum, and subtle differences in soil moisture and vegetation vigor can be detected using at least one near-infrared band. Because there is a wide variety of soil and vegetation colors possible on color and color infrared images, it is not possible to consider them all here. Therefore, our discussion of image tone will describe tone as the shades of gray seen on panchromatic images. Persons working with color or color infrared photographs (or other sensors such as multispectral or hyperspectral scanners or side- looking radar) of specific geographic regions at specific times of the year can work out their own criteria for image tone evaluation following the principles outlined in this section. Vegetation and Land Use Differences in natural or cultivated vegetation often indicate differences in terrain conditions. For example, orchards and vineyards are generally located on welldrained soils, whereas truck farming activities often take place on highly organic soils such as muck and peat deposits. In many cases, however, vegetation and land use obscure differences in terrain conditions and the interpreter must be careful to draw inferences only from meaningful differences in vegetation and land use. The Image Interpretation Process Through an analysis of the elements of image interpretation (topography, drainage pattern and texture, erosion, image tone, vegetation, and land use), the image interpreter can identify different terrain conditions and can determine the boundaries between them. Initially, image interpreters will need to consider carefully each of the above elements individually and in combination in order to estimate terrain conditions. After some experience, these elements are often applied subconsciously as the interpreter develops the facility to recognize certain recurring image patterns almost instantaneously. In complex areas, the interpreter should not make snap decisions about terrain conditions but should carefully consider the topography, drainage pattern and texture, erosion, image tone, vegetation, and land use characteristics exhibited on the aerial and space images. In the remainder of this section, we examine several of the principal bedrock types common on the earth’s surface. For each of these, we consider geologic origin and formation, soil and/or bedrock characteristics, implications for land use planning, and image identification using the elements of image interpretation for terrain evaluation. Our illustrations are limited to occurrences in the United States. We emphasize the recognition of clear-cut examples of various bedrock types. In nature, there are many variations to each type. Interpreters working in specific localities can use the principles set forth here to develop their own image interpretation keys. In cases where distinctions in image appearance must be made for different climatic situations, we will speak of “humid” and “arid” climates. We will consider humid climates to occur in areas that receive 50 cm or more rainfall per year and arid climates to occur in areas that receive less than 50 cm/year rainfall. In the United States, farming without irrigation is generally feasible in areas with a rainfall of about 50 cm/year or more. Areas receiving less than 50 cm/year rainfall typically require irrigation for farming. Even the most searching and capable image analysis can benefit from field verification because the image interpretation process is seldom expected to stand alone. The image interpreter should consult existing topographic, geologic, and soil maps and should conduct a selective field check. The principal benefits of image interpretation for terrain evaluation should be a savings in time, money, and effort. The use of image interpretation techniques can allow for terrain mapping during periods of unsuitable weather for field mapping and can provide for more efficient field operations. In order to illustrate the process of image interpretation for landform identification and evaluation, we will consider the terrain characteristics and image identification of several common bedrock types. Specifically, we treat the analysis of selected sedimentary and igneous rocks. The first three editions of this book treated the subject of landform identification and evaluation in greater detail by including discussions of aeolian landforms, glacial landforms, fluvial landforms, and organic soils (the first and second editions contain the most detailed coverage).