Module 3 Cash Cycle
Module 3 Cash Cycle
MODULE
AUD 4
Cash is an area with high fraud risk, especially when the system of internal control is weak.
Lapping and kiting are two common cash fraud schemes.
1.1 Lapping
The theft of cash is often concealed by failing to account for cash receipts. The most common
of these methods is known as lapping. Lapping occurs when an employee withholds funds
received by a customer for personal use and fails to apply these receipts of cash or checks to
the customer's receivable balance. The unrecorded receipt is covered by applying a subsequent
receipt to the previously unrecorded account.
Safeguards against lapping include the following:
Independent comparison of recorded cash receipts with funds actually deposited.
Separation of incoming receipts from subsidiary accounts receivable remittance advices.
Comparison of the details of bank deposits and the details of remittance credits.
Provision of timely statements.
Confirmation of customer balances.
One of the best methods to guard against lapping is use of a "lock box" system. In this system,
customers send their payments directly to the bank, which prevents company employees from
having access to payments received. A statement is then sent by the bank to the company so the
cash can be applied in the general ledger to the outstanding receivable balance.
1.2 Kiting
Kiting occurs when a check drawn on one bank is deposited in another bank and no record
is made of the disbursement in the balance of the first bank until after year-end. Kiting may
be used to cover a cash shortage or to pad a company's cash position. Kiting results in an
intentional overstatement of cash in the financial statements as the cash is simultaneously
reflected in two different bank accounts.
To detect kiting effectively, a bank transfer schedule should be prepared. For any bank‑to‑bank
transfers that occur near year-end, the disbursement date on the check and in the ledger for the
disbursing account should precede the receipt date noted by the bank and in the ledger for the
receiving account.
To ensure that kiting has not occurred, evidence should exist that all deposits in transit and
outstanding checks listed on the bank reconciliation at year-end cleared in the next period. This
information can be confirmed by using a bank cutoff statement.
Segregation of duties is a key control over cash. Proper segregation of duties demands that close
consideration be given to check-writing authority. Separation of cash handling, record keeping,
and reconciliation of bank statements should exist, as well as separation of petty cash activities.
A strong system of internal control for cash would also include the use of a voucher system for
cash disbursements.
which the client has We have provided to our accountants the following information as of
the year, regardless Name and appropriate space below.* Although we do not request nor expect you to
conduct a comprehensive, detailed search of your records, if during the
Address
[ ] process of completing this confirmation additional information about other
of whether there is deposit and loan accounts we may have with you comes to your attention,
please include such information below. Please use the enclosed envelope to
return the form directly to our accountants.
a year‑end balance 1. At the close of business on the date listed above, our records indicated the following deposit balance(s):
pledged collateral, and The information presented above by the customer is in agreement with our records. Although we have not conducted a comprehensive, detailed search
of our records, no other deposit or loan accounts have come to our attention except as noted below.
guarantee or security
agreements. A sample (Financial Institution Authorized Signature) (Date)
[ ]
* Ordinarily, balances are intentionally left blank if they are not available at the time the form is prepared.
Approved 1990 by American Bankers Association, American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, and Bank Administration D 451 5951
Institute. Additional forms available from: AICPA – Order Department, P.O. Box 1003, NY, NY 10108-1003
y Bank Reconciliation: The year-end bank reconciliation for every account should be
tested by:
1. Footing the bank reconciliation and the list of outstanding checks.
2. Agreeing the balance per the books on the year-end bank reconciliation to the
general ledger.
3. Agreeing the balance per the bank on the year-end bank reconciliation to the
balance per the bank confirmation.
4. Agreeing deposits in transit and outstanding checks to the cutoff bank statement.
The cutoff bank statement is obtained by the auditor from the bank and covers the
first 10 to 15 days of the period after year-end. Reconciling items should generally
clear during the 10‑ to 15‑day period. Any item that does not clear should be
investigated by the auditor and resolved with the client if necessary.
Valuation, Allocation, and Accuracy: The auditor should read the footnotes and other
information related to cash to determine whether the information is accurate and
presented at the appropriate amounts.
Rights and Obligations, and Occurrence: The auditor should compare disclosures to other
audit evidence to ensure that all disclosed information related to cash has occurred.
Understandability of Presentation and Classification: The auditor should read all cash-
related disclosures to ensure that they are understandable.