Distance Learning in Kazakhstan: Estimating Parents' Satisfaction of Educational Quality During The Coronavirus
Distance Learning in Kazakhstan: Estimating Parents' Satisfaction of Educational Quality During The Coronavirus
To cite this article: Baurzhan Bokayev , Zulfiya Torebekova , Zhuldyz Davletbayeva &
Fatima Zhakypova (2021): Distance learning in Kazakhstan: estimating parents’ satisfaction
of educational quality during the coronavirus, Technology, Pedagogy and Education, DOI:
10.1080/1475939X.2020.1865192
Introduction
Among the many severe and structural effects of the Covid-19 pandemic, 1.3 billion students and
their families, spread among more than half of the world’s countries, have had to contend with
national mandates to close schools (UNESCO, 2020). Most of the affected countries were forced to
switch their education systems, public or private, to distance and online learning in record time.
Kazakhstan is no exception. In March 2020, the government of Kazakhstan decided to switch to
distance and online learning as part of a quickly implemented social shutdown. Across the country,
131 universities, 801 colleges and 7398 schools switched to distance/online learning (Information
and Analytical Center, 2020). Traditionally in Kazakhstan, a long spring break occurs in the
school year during the last half of March. This period was used by the education institutions to
ready themselves for a switch to distance/online learning, with the transition beginning in early April
(Baza Yurist (Lawyer database), 2020a).
Thus, educational institutions’ administrations were uniformly faced with the task of ensuring the
organisation of the distance/online learning process and making management decisions aimed at
improving the quality of teaching. Distance learning involves all educational materials being pro
vided to the student, who then returns them upon completion. Typically, the material is conveyed
online, there is no set schedule for classes, and no in-person interactions with the teacher are
expected. Meanwhile, online education has students working online at home, with classes held in
CONTACT Baurzhan Bokayev [email protected] National School of Public Policy, Academy of Public Administration
under the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Nur-Sultan, Kazakhstan
© 2020 Technology, Pedagogy and Education Association
2 B. BOKAYEV ET AL.
real time or recorded and made available online using technological equipment (computer, webcam
etc.). Online learning can be used in combination with in-person teaching to produce ‘blended’
learning. In Kazakhstan, the government empowered schools to have flexible approaches to provid
ing learning materials and education to students: Subject teachers were to adapt their curricula so
that they could be disseminated online or through other available communication technologies.
Activities such as lessons televised on broadcast networks, creating learning groups on social media,
and creating guidance for independent work were among the customised efforts that teachers
nationwide put to use to provide educational services. Schools were to report to the government on
the success of these efforts, and parents were expected by the government and schools to help
create positive learning environments at home and monitor their children’s difficulties and successes
with keeping up with their work (Baza Yurist (Lawyer database), 2020b).
The transition to distance/online learning quickly had a serious impact on all participants in the
educational process. In theory, more than 6 million citizens of Kazakhstan were expected to
immediately become active participants in distance/online learning (students, teachers, parents,
educational authorities). There was little time to solve the immediate challenges with this transition.
In many parts of the country, a lack of access to high-speed Internet at home made the prospect of
streaming lessons difficult to realise. This problem was compounded by many students lacking
access to electronic technology (such as laptop computers) at home. Furthermore, responses to the
survey conducted for this article indicated that many schools – particularly in the countryside – did
not have the effective infrastructure to develop and disseminate online lessons. Many teachers and
school officials also did not have sufficient technological literacy to produce effective content, or
they otherwise had problems with adapting to online teaching.
A special role in the educational process during the pandemic was assigned to parents since they
had a double burden – daily professional activities to support the family and oversight of the
educational activities of their children. There was no easy solution from parents; working from
home promised to be difficult with children – especially young children – to manage, and parents
with jobs that could not be done from home had to figure out who could take care of their children
during the working day. In Kazakhstan, extended family has traditionally played a significant role in
raising the children of working parents. However, the Covid-19 pandemic has put older adults at risk
and demanded higher levels of social isolation. All of this puts additional strain on the parents’
responsibilities.
A potential positive of online education was the idea that parents would become more familiar
with their children’s study habits and consequently more able to play a positive role in their learning.
For example, children hoping to succeed in online education benefit from being focused and
resilient, and evidence shows that parents can substantially support their children’s efforts to
develop such habits (Liu et al., 2010). This assumes a home where parents are willing and able to
promote their children’s education. Unfortunately, for many children their home is not a nurturing or
safe environment. Around the world, the imposition of social isolation has led to a rise in domestic
abuse and family violence (Usher et al., 2020). In these circumstances, parental involvement may not
have a positive effect.
A risk, therefore, of the transition to online education is a further disparity between the children of
those families that are able and prepared, emotionally or otherwise, to support them, and the
children of families who are not. One possible way to gauge the likelihood of positive outcomes is
by examining the level of education of parents, as research has shown this factor to have a significant
impact on the academic results of children (UNESCO, 2000). Even with the best intentions, parents
with lower levels of education face additional obstacles in supporting their children’s learning, and
an online education environment that may ask parents to be more involved could exacerbate this
inequality. An additional question remains whether the Covid-19 pandemic’s economic and social
effects would deteriorate parents’ ability to adjust their level of involvement appropriately in order to
provide positive outcomes, and whether this ability would vary based on the education level of the
parents.
TECHNOLOGY, PEDAGOGY AND EDUCATION 3
Research question
(1) How have parents in Kazakhstan been involved in their children’s educational process during
the Covid-19 pandemic?
(2) How satisfied are Kazakhstani parents with the organisation of distance/online learning
during the same time period?
Literature review
In recent years, online learning has been widely used around the globe (Beck et al., 2013; Culp et al.,
2005). To an extent, the spread of online learning is limited by access to the Internet, communal
infrastructure and communal/individual technological resources; where these factors are lacking,
families have difficulty in participating in online educational opportunities (Rideout & Katz, 2016).
For much of the time these options have been available, little empirical work on parents’
satisfaction with online or distance learning has been done (Beck et al., 2013). Instead, we have
various studies that confirm the important role of parents and families in the development and
education of children (Durisic & Bunijevac, 2017; Richardson, 2009). Other studies find that parents’
general satisfaction with their children’s learning is affected by several factors, including parents’
education levels, marital status and socio-economic characteristics (Jónsdóttir et al., 2017). Much
online learning that takes place has been supplemental to the child’s education in a traditional brick-
and-mortar school, which means that children enrolled typically would come from families that are
willing to go the extra mile to support this extra study, both financially and through learning support.
With the events surrounding the 2020 pandemic, this state of affairs has radically changed, and our
expectations of what satisfies parents with regards to online learning need to be updated.
Parents’ satisfaction with educational services has been mainly associated with parent involve
ment in school activities, which is then linked to positive educational outcomes (Beck et al., 2013;
Laws & Millward, 2001). Studies focusing on the parent’s satisfaction with online schooling, where
school activities face limitations, find a positive relationship between levels of parent engagement
and overall student performance (Beck et al., 2013). They discovered that within an online setting
similar to traditional school settings, more parental involvement led to increased satisfaction with
school between parents and students.
Parents’ involvement in online learning is important to student academic success (Berthelsen &
Walker, 2008; Black, 2009). Parental engagement in online learning may include parents helping
children to develop learning persistence, study and time management skills (Borup et al., 2013).
Parents’ interactions with children’s online learning correlate with course outcomes, including final
grades, perceived learning and course satisfaction (Beck et al., 2013; Borup et al., 2013). Their
encouragement, support and overall modelling have a positive effect on student academic achieve
ments (Bogden, 2003; Huerta et al., 2006).
Studies have identified why parents become engaged in their children’s studies (Hoover-
Dempsey et al., 2005). According to the study results, parents’ engagement was influenced by (1)
a belief that their engagement is necessary, and this engagement would promote their children’s
academic success, and (2) a perception of specific invitations from the school, their children or the
teacher to be engaged, as well as their knowledge, skills, and available time and energy (Hoover-
Dempsey et al., 2005). Another study focused on parental support in online education concludes that
parents have three primary responsibilities: to motivate, monitor and mentor their children (Curtis,
2013). Mentoring responsibilities were explained as the parents’ concern about their children’s
welfare and guiding them through online learning activities. With the Covid-19 lockdowns, psycho
logical distress among students was associated with negative perceptions surrounding e-learning
and the fear of ‘losing’ the academic year (Hasan & Bao, 2020).
However, the level of parental support that is effective depends in part on the technological
knowledge possessed by parents (Delen et al., 2015). Parents who are able can provide important
4 B. BOKAYEV ET AL.
instructional support on specific online learning skills, and they can help their children in searching
for the information needed (Borup & Stevens, 2016; Hasler Waters, 2012; Lee & Figueroa, 2012;
Sorensen, 2012).
With that said, the reality is that many parents lack the content expertise to directly instruct
students on specific course material; moreover, parent instruction or coaching might have a negative
impact on student academic outcomes (Black, 2009; Delen et al., 2015; Ingram et al., 2014).
To add another dimension, parents are concerned that the use of technology and the Internet
enable increased risk of cyberbullying or visiting inappropriate websites (Anastasiades et al., 2008;
Delen et al., 2015; Liau et al., 2008; Sorbring, 2014). In addition, parents may not be fully aware of
their children’s interactivity on the Internet (Beale & Hall, 2007). Thus, studies claim that the safety of
children is the most significant predictor of parent satisfaction (Friedman et al., 2007; Tikkanen,
2019).
As can be seen, the level of satisfaction of parents with distance/online learning has already
depended on many factors, including the level of involvement of parents in the educational process,
children’s results, the level of parents’ competence in information technology, and finally issues of
cybersecurity during teaching.
However, the current research does not yet account for changes in the level of parental satisfac
tion in emergency situations, such as a pandemic.
Representatives from all regions of Kazakhstan took part in the survey. Given that Kazakhstan
occupies ninth place in the world by area despite having a population of only 18 million people,
regional representation in the sample is important in assessing parents’ satisfaction with the quality
of distance/online education.
Qualitative interviews were also used in this research. The purpose of these interviews was to
improve the validity and reliability of the research based on the results of the previous survey. The
goal of data triangulation was pursued here (Denzin, 1978; Morse, 1991). The narrative technique
was used to increase the readability of the text as well as the reliability of the results through the
alternation of information obtained from the survey and interviews, respectively (Kelley et al., 2003).
Quantitative data was analysed using regression analysis, and qualitative findings underwent
coding and manual analysis, since there were 65 interview participants.
To provide more detail on the interview procedure, we must first note that the interview
participants were 65 parents that had been selected from the group of survey respondents who
indicated their desire to participate in further research. Thus, out of 31,300 people who participated
in the online survey, 4401 expressed a desire to participate in the in-depth interview. By using the
probability sampling method with systematic sampling type, 65 people were chosen for the in-depth
TECHNOLOGY, PEDAGOGY AND EDUCATION 5
interview. Each interview lasted around 45 minutes on average. The in-depth interview consisted of 10
main questions, the goal of which was to understand the level of parents’ involvement in their
children’s educational process, their satisfaction with the quality of education during the pandemic
and, finally, to assess the difficulties that they faced in the learning process with their children. Table 1
shows the specific questions that framed all the interviews.
In order to satisfy ethical obligations for academic research, the survey and in-depth interview
questions were approved by the researcher committee of the Academy of Public Administration
under the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan, and permission to conduct the project was
obtained. The participants were informed about the research, and their written consent to partici
pate was obtained.
By using multiple research methods and a sample with participants of different educational
attainment and socio-economic characteristics, a more objective analysis of the involvement of
parents in the educational process and their satisfaction with the quality of distance/online learning
could be conducted.
No classes 0.6
Campus-Learning 2.7
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
mobile equipment for learning such as a laptop/computer, TV and cell phone in the educational
process. The most actively used technological resources among Kazakhstani students during online/
distance learning are cell phone – 45.91% and TV and cell phone – 31.99%. In order to receive online/
distance learning, about 21% have access to a laptop or a computer they can use regularly. As
a result, about 78% of families primarily use cell phones as their only access point to online material.
An interesting point revealed by interviews is that many families do not even have enough
smartphones for each child; they must share.
would take time to install, most educational institutions have switched to a distance learning format
(Tengrinews.kz, 2020).
However, some other factors have influenced parents’ satisfaction with the quality of distance/
online education during the pandemic in Kazakhstan. These factors add to the technological factors
at play and imply some deeper structural issues – and some strengths – in Kazakhstan’s education
system.
I don’t know. It could have been done better. They should have prepared in advance. And to develop the content
of the learning material and transmit everything to a remote format. . . . I am more dissatisfied than satisfied.
(Female, 28 years old, East-Kazakhstan region)
Along with this, the number of children in a family has a strong inverse relationship with the level of
satisfaction of parents. In other words, more children led to decreasing parental satisfaction with the
Table 2. Regression models for parents’ satisfaction with the quality of distance/online education during Covid-19.
Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4
Online Distance Combined Online/Distance/Combined
Intercept .282 .071 .045 .105
Gender –.019 .107 .066 .074
Age .057 .055** .105** .063***
Income .020* .024*** .015 .022***
Education .078* .127*** .183*** .128***
Numbers of Children –.066*** –.066*** –.056** –.064***
Language .039 .110** –.023 .070**
Readiness of Gov .456*** .473*** .442*** .464***
Teachers and Tech .397*** .373*** .386*** .381***
Numbers of observation 5985 19,931 4350 30,266
*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.
8 B. BOKAYEV ET AL.
quality of education. Meanwhile, Model 1, Model 2 and Model 4 show that family income has
a positive effect on parents’ attitude to the quality of education during Covid-19. People with high
incomes are more satisfied with the quality of distance/online education than people with low
incomes. As mentioned, one of the difficulties faced by parents is the lack of access to technological
resources (Figure 2). In this regard, it should be assumed that the lack of sufficient funds to purchase
a computer or other technological resources has a certain impact on the quality of distance/online
education. Parents who are able to afford the technology needed to make full use of the education
will end up experiencing distance/online learning more positively. Larger families face a significant
burden in providing sufficient technological resources for all of their children. This is confirmed by
the results of an in-depth interview.
In general, I am satisfied with the process of learning. There is no issue with a computer, tablet or Internet in our
family because an expensive modem is set . . . We can afford to buy computers . . . Unfortunately, there are
parents in our class who cannot afford that and their children study on a phone . . . Of course, children do not
receive a quality education on a phone. (Female, 42 years old, Nur-Sultan city)
One smartphone for all the members of the family. It is impossible to study this way. We don’t even know what
to do. (Female, 45 years old, Karaganda region)
The TV is broken, the laptop doesn’t properly work. (Female, 45 years old, East-Kazakhstan region)
One phone for three students. (Female, 39 years old, Mangistau region)
We study only via TV. The mobile phone is broken. To buy a computer, having four children is impossible. I have
to buy them either food and feed them, or buy expensive laptops . . . Everything got expensive. (Female, 46 years
old, Kyzylorda region)
At the same time, the regression analysis showed that there is a direct positive correlation between
the level of satisfaction of parents with the quality of education during the pandemic and their
assessments of the level of competence of teachers and the readiness of the government to switch
to distance learning. Thus, all four regression models show that as the scale of evaluation of these
variables increases, the level of satisfaction also increases. This fact is also confirmed by previous
research according to which the educational achievements of students depend more on the quality
of teaching than on the number of students in one class (Rivkin et al., 2005). In this regard, the level
of competence of teachers has an impact on the quality of education, which is ultimately correlated
with the level of satisfaction of parents.
Along with this, it is interesting that on average, parents whose children are taught in Kazakh are
more satisfied with the quality of education than children with Russian, English and mixed lan
guages. Thus, Model 2 and Model 4 show that satisfaction with the quality of education also has
a relationship with the language of instruction (Table 2).
There is unwillingness to study without a teacher. (Female, 36 years old, Kostanay region)
I believe that the pandemic has certainly affected all areas of people’s lives. We were all not ready for it. It is
difficult for children to make a drastic change from a regular educational process to a distance learning
process . . . Children do not want to study in an apartment. (Female, 42 years old, East-Kazakhstan region)
TECHNOLOGY, PEDAGOGY AND EDUCATION 9
35
30 28.7 28.8
25
19.4
20
14.8
15
10 8.2
0
Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
Figure 3. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: Social isolation affects my child’s learning motivation? (%).
Based on the current state of quarantine in Kazakhstan, it is interesting to note that families that are
heeding the social isolation rules more closely may see a greater negative effect as a result of social
isolation. Families that still hold social gatherings and allow their children out to socialise may be
better at preserving their motivation, but at the expense of public health. Parents reported in the
interviews that their decisions on how closely to adhere to public health recommendations depend
in part on their opinion on the extent to which their children can cope with social distancing.
Discussion
According to the analysis, transition to distance/online learning in a pandemic requires improvement
in technological and pedagogical terms. The research conducted showed that weak points exist, and
there were real consequences as a result of the insufficient preparedness of the country’s educational
system for this forced initiative; consequences confirmed by the responses of parents.
It is important to note that just as the problems seen in the transition to online/distance learning
have had larger negative repercussions – on the mental wellbeing of families, for example, –
addressing them will have positive consequences much more far-reaching than providing a better
scholastic experience. The results of the study show that social isolation during the quarantine
directly affected children’s motivation to learn. Moreover, families strictly following the social
isolation rules confirmed a greater negative effect from the social isolation on their children. In
addition, parents of active children found it difficult to make sure they studied productively and
happily at home. Keeping in mind the dangers of psychological distress on children, Hasan and Bao
(2020) provided additional guidance for parents on how to support their children’s emotional health
and learning, with the goals of improving harmony in homes and encouraging families to follow
public health recommendations.
Meanwhile, extending high-speed Internet access across Kazakhstan and supporting access to
technological equipment and infrastructure will likely bring economic opportunities to less-
developed regions of Kazakhstan. The difficulties these regions faced with the transition to dis
tance/online learning gave further evidence to the findings of Rideout and Katz (2016), namely that
Internet and other technological infrastructure are no longer luxuries, rather they are vital to
uplifting economically disadvantaged families. With more access to technology, parents will also
grow more technologically literate and be able to help their children access educational and other
opportunities. Furthermore, access to online/distance learning opportunities can allow more chil
dren than ever before access to trained, highly qualified teachers who are otherwise in short supply
10 B. BOKAYEV ET AL.
in many places in Kazakhstan, increasing the standard of education across the country. In support of
that conclusion, Rivkin et al. (2005) pointed out the crucial dependence that children’s educational
achievements have on the quality of teaching.
We must also bear in mind that in the Kazakhstani experience, the main factors affecting the level
of parental satisfaction with the quality of distance/online learning are family socio-economic
characteristics, the number of children in the family (which itself is closely related to family socio-
economic status), the readiness of the government to switch to distance/online learning, and the
observed level of teachers’ professional competence. An inability to equip children with the tech
nological resources to properly access distance/online education increases the level of parents’
dissatisfaction (or anxiety) with distance/online learning. This discovery supported the findings of
Jónsdóttir et al. (2017), namely that parents’ general satisfaction with their children’s schooling is
influenced by the parents’ level of educational attainment, marital status and socio-economic back
ground, suggesting that similar forces are at play in the distance/online education era. However,
where Jónsdóttir et al. (2017) found that parents grew more unhappy with schools as their children
got older, the current study found that parents of older children were more satisfied in the current
situation than parents of younger children. This discrepancy is significant because it implies that the
unique factors that make the current situation different have weighed more heavily than whatever
factors influenced satisfaction before.
Another interesting finding of the current study is that the level of parents’ satisfaction with the
quality of education during the Covid-19 pandemic directly correlates with their evaluations of the level
of competence of teachers and the readiness of the government to implement distance/online learning.
Moreover, an improvement in such evaluations is reflected in an increase in the level of satisfaction.
In the meantime, a variety of methods from other countries exist to address these issues that will
in turn fuel the growth of Kazakhstan’s middle class. Ability to provide access to education for their
children can be an excellent criterium for the distribution of government assistance. Additional tax
credits could be made available for additional children. Identifying where teachers are not perform
ing to the satisfaction of parents provides targets for retraining and, as mentioned, the expansion of
online education. A family that is supported so that they do not need to decide between education
(due to the cost of technology) and feeding their children, will be freed from pressure so that soon
they will no longer need support and can contribute a higher value to society.
Study implications
This study confirms the significant role of parents in a rapidly changing educational process. Parental
satisfaction with the learning process depends on many factors, including the competence of the
teachers and the quality of the learning content. Distance/online learning during the pandemic
exposed many problems associated with applying these models on a large scale, which was subse
quently reflected in the level of parental satisfaction. Internet speed, student access to the Internet
and technological resources, and the ability of teachers to create quality learning content and teach
online have become important components that determine the level of organisation of the educa
tional process during the pandemic. These components have also become the fundamental criteria for
assessing the activities of authorised bodies in the field of education and educational institutions. The
ability to properly coordinate distance/online learning, provide quality educational content, create an
enabling environment for access to distance/online learning and other factors have determined the
actual level and the public perception of government readiness to conduct distance/online learning.
Study limitations
The main limitation of this study arises from it being conducted in a very short period of time and in
a period of rapid change. Thus, in future studies the ‘snapshot’ nature of the results can be modified.
Meanwhile the research results mainly reflect the process of distance/online learning in general
TECHNOLOGY, PEDAGOGY AND EDUCATION 11
education schools; however, the study involved the parents of children enrolled in educational
schools, colleges and universities. While more targeted sampling can address this problem in future
studies, the results here shed light on some of the most common educational problems in Kazakhstan.
Conclusion
In this study, parental satisfaction with education as a result of the ability of the Kazakh government to
smoothly switch to distance/online learning served as a measure of success for broader national devel
opment strategies. How much of the country has access to sufficiently high-speed Internet, the availability
of educational resources for distance/online learning, and finally the availability and affordability of
technological equipment such as computers and other resources for families – these are questions that
have an impact far beyond the immediate transition of the country’s education system. Certain resources
can be scaled up – for example, teachers who demonstrate exceptional skills in delivering video lessons
can be shown to a much larger audience, with other teachers having more time as a result for other tasks.
Diversification of labour can therefore be used in order to improve the overall level of education.
However, one of the most important tasks of teachers and an important part of a child’s successful
journey through school – pastoral support – is much more difficult to scale up. We may see a future where
relatively few teachers who are gifted lecturers specialise in conducting those video lessons, a larger
group of teachers provide continuous guidance on how to update these lessons, and the bulk of teachers
are trained and devote their time to providing pastoral support online or in-person, on a more persona
lised basis. This would be a future resulting from a desire to not merely restore satisfaction with the
education system to status quo ante, but to take advantage of the situation to make improvements.
In general, the results of the study conducted in the Kazakhstani context are of practical value for
public authorities in the field of education policy implementation as it fits into larger national policy,
and they can be used to adjust distance/online learning processes in the future, as worldwide
societies continue to grapple with the uncertainty introduced by extreme events such as pandemics.
Even with the promised development of viable vaccines, the world cannot go back to the way it once
was – both because of the advantages discovered of moving some work/education online as well as
for public health reasons – and Kazakhstan has the opportunity to use this forced transition as a spur
to bring about a more innovative and accessible education system and significantly improve the
wellbeing and potential of all its citizens.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
Notes on contributor
Baurzhan Bokayev, PhD, is a professor at the National School of Public Policy of the Academy of Public Administration
under the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan. He is currently conducting research at Maxwell School of Citizenship
and Public Affairs of Syracuse University, USA. His research focuses on education and migration policy.
Zulfiya Torebekova is a PhD student at Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs, Syracuse University, USA.
Her research focuses on education policy.
Zhuldyz Davletbayeva, PhD, is a professor at the Academy of Public Administration under the President of the
Republic of Kazakhstan. Her research focuses on anticorruption policy.
Fatima Zhakypova, PhD, is a professor at the Academy of Public Administration under the President of the Republic
of Kazakhstan. Her research focuses on economics, public administration and education policy.
ORCID
Baurzhan Bokayev http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1037-7085
Zhuldyz Davletbayeva http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3094-5254
12 B. BOKAYEV ET AL.
References
Anastasiades, P. S., Vitalaki, E., & Gertzakis, N. (2008). Collaborative learning activities at a distance via interactive
videoconferencing in elementary schools: Parents’ attitudes. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1527–1539. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.02.003
Baza Yurist (Lawyer database). 2020a. Order of the Minister of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan dated
April 8, 2020 № 135 About additional measures to ensure the quality of education in the transition of the educational
process to remote educational technologies for the period of the COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic. https://online.zakon.
kz/Document/?doc_id=39442167#pos=292;-54
Baza Yurist (Lawyer database). 2020b. The resolution of the Chief state sanitary doctor of the Republic of Kazakhstan
dated March 12, 2020 No. 20-RCD “On strengthening measures to prevent the import and spread of coronavirus
infection in the Republic of Kazakhstan during the pandemic”. https://online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=
39485622#pos=5;-106
Beale, A., & Hall, K. R. (2007). Cyber-bullying: What school administrators and parents can do. Clearing House, 81(1), 8–12.
https://doi.org/10.3200/TCHS.81.1.8-12
Beck, D., Maranto, R., & Lo, W.-J. (2013). Determinants of student and parent satisfaction at a cyber charter school. The
Journal of Educational Research, 107(3), 209–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2013.807494
Berthelsen, D., & Walker, S. (2008). Parents’ involvement in their children’s education. Family Matters, no. 79, 34–41.
http://www.aifs.gov.au/institute/pubs/fm2008/fm79/bw.pdf
Black, E. W. (2009). An evaluation of familial involvements’ influence on student achievement in K–12 virtual schooling
[Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Florida.
Bogden, J. (2003, Autumn). Cyber charter schools: A new breed in the educational corral. The State Education Standard,
33–37.
Borup, J., Graham, C. R., & Davies, R. S. (2013). The nature of parental interactions in an online charter school. American
Journal of Distance Education, 27(1), 40–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2013.754271
Borup, J., & Stevens, M. (2016). Parents’ perceptions of teacher support at a cyber charter high school. Journal of Online
Learning Research, 2(3), 227–246. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/173212/
Culp, K. M., Honey, M., & Mandinach, E. (2005). A retrospective on twenty years of education technology policy. Journal
of Educational Computing Research, 32(3), 279–307. https://doi.org/10.2190/7W71-QVT2-PAP2-UDX7
Curtis, H. (2013). A mixed methods study investigating parental involvement and student success in high school online
education [Unpublished PhD dissertation]. Northwest Nazarene University.
Delen, E., Kaya, F., Ritter, N., & Sahin, A. (2015). Understanding parents’ perceptions of communication technology use.
International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 7(4), 22–36. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.15345/iojes.
2015.04.003
Denzin, N. K. (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Durisic, M., & Bunijevac, M. (2017). Parental involvement as an important factor for successful education. CEPS Journal, 7
(3), 137–153. https://www.pedocs.de/frontdoor.php?source_opus=14918
Friedman, B., Bobrowski, P., & Markow, D. (2007). Predictors of parents’ satisfaction with their children’s school. Journal
of Educational Administration, 45(3), 278–288. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230710747811
Hasan, N., & Bao, Y. (2020, November). Impact of ‘e-Learning crack-up’ perception on psychological distress among
college students during COVID-19 pandemic: A mediating role of ‘fear of academic year loss’. Children and Youth
Services Review, 118, 105355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105355
Hasler Waters, L. (2012). Exploring the experiences of learning coaches in a cyber charter school: A qualitative case study
[Unpublished PhD dissertation]. University of Hawaii, College of Education.
Hoover-Dempsey, K. V., Walker, J. M. T., Sandler, H. M., Whetsel, D., Green, C. L., Wilkins, A. S., & Closson, K. (2005). Why do
parents become involved? Research findings andimplications. The Elementary School Journal, 106(2), 105–130.
https://doi.org/10.1086/499194
Huerta, L. A., Gonzales, M. F., & d’Entrement, C. (2006). Cyber and home school charter schools: Adopting policy to new
forms of public schooling. Peabody Journal of Education, 81(1), 103–139. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327930pje8101_
6
Information and Analytical Center. (2020). National collection ‘Statistics education system of the Republic Kazakhstan’.
Nur-Sultan.
Ingram, P. B., Smith, S., Pace, J., & Johnson, S. (2014). Effectiveness of virtual schools for students with disabilities: Caregiver
role perceptions [Manuscript submitted for publication].
Jónsdóttir, K., Björnsdóttir, A., & Bæck, U. K. (2017). Influential factors behind parents’ general satisfaction with
compulsory schools in Iceland. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 3(2), 155–164. https://doi.org/10.
1080/20020317.2017.1347012
Kelley, K., Clark, B., Brown, V., & Sitzia, J. (2003). Good practice in the conduct and reporting of survey research.
International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 15(3), 261–266. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzg031
Laws, G., & Millward, L. (2001). Predicting parents’ satisfaction with the education of their child with Down’s syndrome.
Educational Research, 43(2), 209–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131880110051173
TECHNOLOGY, PEDAGOGY AND EDUCATION 13
Lee, M., & Figueroa, R. (2012). Internal and external indicators of virtual learning success. Distance Learning, 9(1), 21–28.
https://usdla.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/Vol.-9-No.-1-2012.pdf
Liau, A. K., Khoo, A., & Ang, P. (2008). Parental awareness and monitoring of adolescent Internet use. Current Psychology,
27(4), 217–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-008-9038-6
Liu, F., Black, E., Algina, J., Cavanaugh, C., & Dawson, R. (2010). The validation of one parental involvement measurement
in virtual schooling. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 9(2), 105–132.
Morse, J. M. (1991). Approaches to qualitative-quantitative methodological triangulation. Nursing Research, 40(2),
120–123. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-199103000-00014
Richardson, S. A. (2009). Principal’s perceptions of parental involvement in the ‘big 8ʹ urban districts of Ohio. Research in
the Schools, 16(1), 1–12.
Rideout, V. J., & Katz, V. S. (2016). Opportunity for all? Technology and learning in lower-income families. A report of the
families and media project. The Joan Ganz Cooney Center at Sesame Workshop.
Rivkin, S. G., Hanushek, E. A., & Kain, J. F. (2005). Teachers, schools, and academic achievement. Econometrica, 73(2),
417–458. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2005.00584.x
Sorbring, E. (2014). Parents’ concerns about their teenage children’s internet use. Journal of Family Issues, 35(1), 75–96.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X12467754
Sorensen, C. (2012). Learning online at the K-12 level: A parent/guardian perspective. International Journal of
Instructional Media, 39(4), 297–308.
Tengrinews.kz. (2020). Ministry of Education and Science cancelled online classes for students ‘Our Internet does not suit’.
https://tengrinews.kz/news/mon-otmenil-onlayn-uroki-shkolnikov-nash-internet-397322/
Tikkanen, J. (2019). Parental school satisfaction in the context of segregation of basic education in urban Finland. Nordic
Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 5(3), 165–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2019.1688451
UNESCO. (2000). Parents and learning. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000125451
UNESCO. (2020). UNESCO’s support: Educational response to COVID-19. UNESCO. https://ru.unesco.org/covid19/
educationresponse
Usher, K., Bhullar, N., Durkin, J., Gyamfi, N., & Jackson, D. (2020). Family violence and COVID-19: Increased vulnerability
and reduced options for support. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 29(4), 549–552. https://doi.org/10.
1111/inm.12735