Phys 3422
Phys 3422
By; Bessie M
In principle, all three things can be happening simultaneously. However, we see most
things through reflection.
If an object has no reflection, then, if there is no generation, it would appear to be
absolutely black. We call it a black-body. All incident light is totally absorbed.
where 𝐴 is the surface area of the BB and 𝜍 is a constant equal to 5.67 × 10−8 𝐽/𝑠𝑚2 𝐾 4
→ However, since we usually work with a cavity, we can say the same thing by looking at the
total 𝐸𝑀 energy density within the cavity.
∞
𝜌𝑇 = 𝜌 𝑣 𝑑𝑣 ⟹ 𝜌𝑇 = 𝑎𝑇 4
0
To get there, he tossed aside the assumption that energies are continuously distributed.
Instead assumed that the energy of EM modes in the cavity consisted of discrete packets. The
energy of each packet was proportional to the frequency of the 𝐸𝑀 mode.
𝐸 = 0, 𝜈, 2𝜈, 3𝜈, 4𝜈, 5𝜈, 𝑒𝑡𝑐.
→ According to Kirchhoff: The amount of radiation being absorbed at each and every
frequency, will be exactly matched by outgoing radiation generated by the BB.
So, a perfect absorber of light must also be a perfect emitter of light.
At the threshold frequency, 𝜈0 electrons are just ejected and do not have any kinetic energy.
Below this frequency, there is no electron emission. Thus, the energy of a photon with this
frequency must be the work function of the metal.
𝑊 = Φ = 𝑣0
𝐸 2 = 𝑃2 𝑐 2
𝑐
⟹𝐸= = 𝑃𝑐
𝜆
ℎ
𝜆 = (de-Broglie wavelength)
𝑃
Rearranging,
𝑃
𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝑝𝑜𝑡𝑜𝑛𝑠 =
𝐸𝐴
ℎ𝑐 6.626×10−34 ×3×108
i) 𝐸= = = 6.626 × 10−34 𝐽 = 4.14 𝑒𝑉
𝜆 3000×10−10
𝐾. 𝐸𝑚𝑎𝑥 = 𝐸 − Φ0 = 1.84 𝑒𝑉
ii) The number of photons reaching the surface per second
𝑃 2
𝑛𝑝 = = = 6.04 × 1014 𝑝𝑜𝑡𝑜𝑛𝑠/𝑠𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑑
𝐸𝐴 6.626×10−19 2×10−4
Rate of emission of photo electrons=40%𝑛𝑝
⟹ 𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑜𝑓𝑒𝑚𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛 = 0.4 × 6.04 × 1014 = 2.415 × 1014 𝑝𝑜𝑡𝑜𝑛𝑠/𝑠𝑒𝑐
o The second problem is that when one looks at the optical emission form of atoms, there is
not a continuous range of frequencies being emitted. Instead the emission is bunched
into very specific, discrete “lines”.
1 1 1
=R −
𝜆 𝑛2 2 𝑛1 2
Taking the experimental results and tying them to some of the nascent quantum
ideas, Niels Bohr managed to patch together a theory that seemed to account for
the observed optical properties of the hydrogen atom.
Hydrogen was used as the standard, since it was the simplest atom, with just a single
electron. Also, it’s emission properties were will known from many experiments.
Because hydrogen is the most abundant element in the Universe, the Balmer lines are a
common feature in optical astronomy and the red 𝐻𝛼 line corresponding to the electron
transition from the 𝑛 = 3 to the 𝑛 = 2 energy level gives the characteristic pink/red color in
true-color images of ionized regions in planetary nebulae, supernova remnants and stellar
nurseries.
1) The electron in a hydrogen atom moves in circular orbit about the proton (nucleus) under
the influence of the Coulomb attraction, obeying the laws of classical mechanics.
2) Instead of the infinity of orbits which should be possible, electrons instead are limited to
orbits for which the angular momentum is quantized in multiples of /2𝜋 (hereafter
denoted as ℏ ). This says that angular momentum, 𝐿 = 𝑚𝑣𝑟 = 𝑛ℏ where 𝑚 is the electron
mass, 𝑣 is the velocity, 𝑟 is the radius of the orbit, and 𝑛 is an integer (𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑢𝑚 𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟).
These specific orbits are called orbitals.
3) Even though the electron is being accelerated constantly in an orbit, it does not emit any
EM radiation.
4) EM radiation is emitted if the electron changes from one orbit to another, i.e. from one
energy level to another.
𝐸𝑖 − 𝐸𝑓 = 𝑣
where 𝐸𝑖 is the initial orbital energy and 𝐸𝑓 is the final energy
Bohr’s approach was a hybrid theory, mixing classical ideas with the new quantum concepts,
but did seem to explain the observed optical spectra.
𝐿 = 𝑚𝑣𝑟 = 𝑛ℏ
Solving for the radius 𝑟
4𝜋𝜀0 ℏ2 2
𝑟= 2 𝑛
𝑞 𝑚
For 𝑛 = 1, the radius works out to 0.0531𝑛𝑚 , which is known as the “Bohr radius”, and
denoted as 𝑎0 .
𝑚𝑞 4 1
𝐸=−
2 4𝜋𝜀0 2 ℏ2 𝑛2
Plugging in for the constants within the brackets:
−13.6 𝑒𝑉
E=
𝑛2
Note this expression agrees with the empirical relationship determined by Rydberg from the
experimental spectra.
ℎ𝑐 1 1 1 2.17×10−18 𝐽 1 1 1 1
𝐸= = 13.6 𝑒𝑉 − ⟹ = − ≡𝑅 −
𝜆 𝑛𝑓 2 𝑛𝑖 2 𝜆 ℎ𝑐 𝑛𝑓 2 𝑛𝑖 2 𝑛𝑓 2 𝑛𝑖 2
Bohr’s model of the atom matched well with the experimental observations.
We’ve seen 3 important problems that required new, unusual notions to be added
to the familiar theories of classical physics.
There exists an objective physical reality It appears that the observer always affects
independent of any observer. the experiment. It is impossible to
disentangle the two.
11/22/2022 Phys 3422 34
By the early part of the twentieth century, quantum
mechanics provided a mathematical description of
microscopic phenomena in complete agreement with our
empirical knowledge of all non-relativistic phenomena.
→ Non-relativistic refers to-not based on or involving the theory of relativity