Project Monitoring and Evaluation
Project Monitoring and Evaluation
General Instruction
Nov,2023
1
Project Monitoring and Evaluation
Name Sec._I
Journal title
Volume no, 10
Use your own words and full sentences don’t copy the abstract
2
Key concept Monitoring and evaluation systems are used
by organizations or governments to measure,
Definition of key concepts that support the
track progress, and evaluate the outcomes of
author’s arguments
projects.
3
Key Findings: Based on the study findings, the proposed
system was successfully developed. It contains
What were the main findings?
three modules: a project registration module, a
Is the main findings based on the thematic project tracking module, and a project status
area? module. This study intended to develop a tool
to track and report the status of projects and
Do you think the objectives are achieved;
allow prompt actions to mitigate the
hypothesis are tested and research questions
encountered challenges and risks.
are answered?
The main findings are based on the relating
topic or thematic area, which improves the
project performance.
The Ministry of Health, Community
Development, Gender, Elderly and Children
(MoHCDGEC) currently relies on manual or
paper based systems in M&E of project
activities, revealing a number of challenges in
their operation such as poor information
sharing and underperformance. Some previous
studies indicate that there is a need for web-
based tools to monitor and evaluate project
activities, simplify data collection,
accommodate information sharing among
stakeholders and improve the projects’
performance. After the system’s development,
the results of user acceptance testing indicate
that the developed PMES will help reducing
the presented challenges. Moreover, the
developed system will improve the quality of
data, simplify the process of data collection
and improve the progress of projects of the
Ministry of Health in Tanzania.
4
The mean score for each validated feature was
above 3.5 which indicates that the majority of
the respondents accepted the developed
system, and they will be able to continue using
it in their projects in order to improve the
project implementation performance.
Therefore, they will recommend the tool or its
extensions to fit other minister/organization
M&E projects.
Critique:
What new ideas or information was
communicated in the article? How adequate is
the evidence/result in support of the central
argument of the author? What is the
methods/style of referencing? Is it consistent?
Thank you