The document discusses monitoring and evaluation of health information management systems. It covers the purpose of HMIS M&E, which is to assess integrated service delivery and use appropriate indicators to successfully implement programs and measure effects. Key components of the HMIS M&E framework include indicator domains, data collection, analysis and use. Common indicators are organized into categories like reproductive health, immunization, disease prevention and resource utilization.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
11 views
Mty1106 Lec7
The document discusses monitoring and evaluation of health information management systems. It covers the purpose of HMIS M&E, which is to assess integrated service delivery and use appropriate indicators to successfully implement programs and measure effects. Key components of the HMIS M&E framework include indicator domains, data collection, analysis and use. Common indicators are organized into categories like reproductive health, immunization, disease prevention and resource utilization.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5
MTY1106 LEC: HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEM
MODULE 7: HMIS MONITORING AND EVALUATION
2nd Semester | SY 2021-2022 TRANSCRIBED BY: NINA RICCI O. DELA PAZ LECTURER: Mr. Theo Segismundo o Better alignment and monitoring of TOPIC fundings SUBTOPIC o 4 components: indicator domains, SUB-SUBTOPIC data collection, analysis and synthesis, and communication use HMIS M&E o Indicator should be tracked to assess Ø Assist planning and management of national processes and results associated health strategy plans with various indicator domains Ø Continuous monitoring and evaluation is § Provide strength and necessary weaknesses for Ø Monitoring- collection, analysis, and use of troubleshooting information gathered o Outcomes and impact indicators- o Learning from acquired experiences changes may not be directly caused o Accounting internal and external by serviced delivery efforts resources § Useful in understanding o Obtaining results and making current health status and decisions context Ø Evaluation- systemic assessment of § Understand the ways in which completed programs or policies packages of interventions can o Gauge effectiveness of program to lead to impact over time make adjustments o Learning function- incorporate M&E PLAN learning to future proposals Ø Address components of framework o Monitoring function- review Ø Establishes foundation for regular reviews implementation based on objectives during implementation and resources Ø Local M&E- generate info for global monitoring based on health sector review PURPOSE processes Ø Assess effect of integrated service delivery o Key factors in monitoring progress Ø Appropriate indicators, data collection Ø Hospital are monitored and evaluated systems, and data analysis guide successful through assessments of reports, surveys, implementation and measure effect on both HMIS, and other evaluation studies service delivery and use of services Ø National Health Mission of India- identifies strategies which help in successful FRAMEWORK implementation Ø Developed by various global partners and Ø Framework should be: countries o Localized Ø From Paris declaration on aid harmonization o Address needs for multiple users and and effectiveness and the International purposes Health Partnership (IHP+) o Facilitate identification of indicators o Place health strategy and related and data sources M&E processes at center o Used in disease-specific programs Ø Core framework: strengthening of common country platform for M&E of HSS INDICATORS 14. PLWHA currently Ø Measures the value of change in units that on ART can be compared in past and future units Ø Focus: single aspect of a program such as Resource Utilization 15. Trace drug input and output availability (in stock) Ø United States Agency for International 16. OPD attendance Development classifies indicators into five per capita broad categories 17. In-patient o Reproductive health admission rate o Immunization Data Quality 18. Average length of o Disease prevention and control stay (in-patient) o Resource utilization 19. Bed occupancy rate o Data quality 20. Reporting completeness rate CATEGORIES 21. Reporting KEY PERFORMANCE KEY INDICATOR timeliness rate AREA Reproductive Health 1. Family planning QUANTITATIVE INDICATOIRS FOR acceptance rate MONITORING FAMILY 2. Antenatal care PLANNING/IMMUNIZATION INTEGRATION coverage INDICATOR DATA PURPOSE 3. Proportion of SOURCE deliveries attended by INPUTS skilled health personnel Vaccine HMIS, Service Monitor 4. Proportion of stockouts in a statistics vaccine deliveries attended by single month stockouts. HEWS (YES/NO, by Immunization 5. DPT-3 (Pentavalent- type of 3) coverage (>1 child) vaccine) 6. Measles Immunization coverage (>1 child) Disease Prevention 7. Malaria case fatality and Control rate among patients under 5 years of age Contraceptive HMIS, Service Monitor 8. New malaria cases stockouts in a statistics contraceptive per 1,000 population single month stockouts 9. New pneumonia (YES/NO, by cases among children type of under 5 per 1,000 contraceptive) population of < 5 yrs. Number of Training Monitor reach 10. TB case detection service records of EPI/FP rate 4. providers integration 11. TB cure rate f trained in training as an 12. Clients receiving provision of input for VCT services EPI/FP effective 13. PMTCT treatment integrated integrated completion rate services service delivery. OUTPUTS immunization Ledger Number of Service Coverage of services who [Monitored for service statistics and integrated accept a demonstration/ delivery points Supervision service referral to pilot programs offering delivery family only] integrated FP planning and services Immunization Number/perce Comparison of Follow services nt of women supplemental through on FP offered attending tracking column referrals Number of Service Availability of routine added to provided by days per Statistics and co-located FPI Immunization Immunization the vaccinator month when Supervision immunization services who ledger, and both (Observation + services follow through supplemental immunization Interviews) on a FP tracking column and family referral from a added to FP planning vaccinator ledger services are at [Monitored for the same site demonstration/ Number/perce Supplemental Quality pilot programs nt of women tracking column continuity of only] attending that can be implementatio Number/perce Comparison of Follow routine child added to n of integrate nt of women supplemental through on immunization existing service attending tracking column immunization services who immunization delivery family added to FP referrals received register planning ledger, and provided by information on (Monitored for services who supplemental the family family demonstration/ follow through tracking column planning planning from pilot programs on referral to added to provider a vaccinator only) immunization Immunization INDICATOR DATA PURPOSE services from ledger SOURCE a family [Monitored for Number/perce Supplemental Purpose planning demonstration/ nt of women tracking column Quality/contin provider pilot programs (with children added to FP uity of only] <12 months) Ledger implementatio OUTCOMES going for [Monitored for n of integrated Number of Immunization Use of family demonstration/ service children ledger/HMIS, immunization planning who pilot programs delivery receiving DTP and population- services, receive only] 1. DTP 3, based survey dropout information on measles, and data Immunization DTP 1-3 from the family dropout planning Immunization HMIS and Percentage of provider coverage for population- children <12 Number/perce Supplemental Acceptance of DTP1, DTP3, based Survey months in a nt of women tracking column FP referrals and measles Data given attending added to provided by population routine child Immunization the vaccinator who have received Ø Maternal survival intervention, child mortality DTP1 and and child survival intervention, and Stop TB DTP3 program Number of Family Planning Uptake of new family ledger/HMIS family MATERNAL SURVIVAL INTERVENTIONS planning planning Ø 5th MDG- reduce maternal mortality ratio by acceptors by services 75% and achieve universal access to method type reproductive health and Ø None of the maternal survival intervention demographic/ alone can reduce maternal mortality rate age group Ø Campbell and Graham (2006) Contraceptive Population Contraceptive o Complexity of country contexts and prevalence Survey Data use within a maternal health determinants makes rate given it complicated to choose the best population strategies in achieving this goal Total financial Program Cost of inputs o Packaging of health facility-oriented cost of inputs data/Special required for interventions is highly effective and required to costing studies integration. has high coverage integrate FP This may be Ø HMIS- provide some of core input, process, and helpful in and output indicators to routinely monitor immunization planning for progress towards implementation services (per decisions Ø HMIS indicators are related to the following: facility, per related to 1. Pregnancy care intervention client sustainability o 1st antenatal care attendances exposed, per and scale-up o 4th antenatal care attendances new FP of integrated o Cases of abnormal pregnancies acceptor) services. attended at out-patient departments IMPACT (OPD) health facilities Maternal, Studies on Measure o Institutional cases of maternal infant, and maternal and improvement morbidity and mortality due to child mortality infant mortality in health antepartum hemorrhage (APH), rates IMPACT status hypertension and edema reported by in-patient departments (IPD) of Ø Input- information you should collect before health facilities the implementation of program o Cases of abortion attended at health Ø Output- once you start the program itself facilities Ø Outcome- program has ended o Cases of medical (safe) abortions conducted at health facilities INDICATORS & HEALTH PROGRAMS 2. Intrapartum care Ø HMIS- source of routine data necessary for o Deliveries by skilled attendants (at monitoring different aspects of various health health facilities) programs o Deliveries by health extension Ø HMIS indicators should be carefully selected workers (HEW) (at home of health to meet essential information necessary for posts) monitoring and present an overview o Institutional cases of maternal Ø Used for monitoring program performance morbidity and mortality due to and how it encourages similar in-depth obstructed labor analysis 3. Postpartum care o 1st postnatal care attendance o Institutional cases of maternal morbidity and mortality due to postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) and puerperal sepsis 4. Interpartum care o Family planning method acceptors (new and repeat) o Family planning method issued by type of method
CHILD MORTALITY AND CHILD SURVIVAL
INTERVENTION Ø Pneumonia- leading cause of under-5 child mortality in the Philippines in 2012 (DOH) STOP TB PROGRAM o 2,051 cases Ø Envisions a TB-free world Ø Various strategies to ensure good health of Ø Goal: dramatically reduce global burden of Filipino children by 2025 tuberculosis by 2015 1. Child 21 Ø In line w/ WHO’s MDG and push TB up the o Child 21 or the Philippine National world political agenda Strategic Framework for Plan Ø Main objective: Achieve universal access to Development for children 2000 to high-quality health care for all people w/ TB 2025 serves as a framework for Ø Core strategy: TB case detection and policymaking and program planning successful completion of treatment/cure and as a roadmap for interventions Ø Target by 2050: reduce prevalence of and aimed at safeguarding the welfare of deaths due to TB by 50% compared w/ 1990 Filipino children. This is part of the baseline Philippines commitment to the United Ø HMIS indicators: Nations Convention on the Rights of o TB patients on DOTS (Number of the Child (UN CRC). new smear-positive pulmonary TB 2. Children’s Health 2025 case enrolled in the cohort) o This is a subdocument of Child 21 o TB case detection (Number of new which focuses on the development of smear-positive pulmonary TB case Filipino children and the protection of detected, number of new smear- their rights by utilizing the life cycle negative pulmonary TB case approach. detected, number of new extra- 3. Integrated Management of Childhood pulmonary TB case detected) Illness (IMCI) o HIV-TB co-infection (Proportion of o strategy that aims to lower child newly diagnosed TB cases tested for mortality caused by common HIV) illnesses. o HIV + new TB patients enrolled in 4. Enhanced Child Growth DOTS o intervention aimed to improve the o TB treatment outcome (Treatment health and nutrition of Filipino completed PTB+, Cured PTB+, children by operating community- Defaulted PTB+, Deaths PTB+) based health and nutrition posts all throughout the country