Development of CLIL Activities
Development of CLIL Activities
Campo/Arloa: English
Mayo, 2021
Development of CLIL activities for Primary Education: Energy and Matter
‘One language sets you in a corridor for life. Two languages open every
door along the way’ Frank Smith
2
Maite Izu Ventura
Resumen
Palabras clave: AICLE (Aprendizaje Integrado de Contenidos y Lenguas Extranjeras); bilingüismo, 4Cs;
tríptico del lenguaje; Ciencias Naturales.
Abstract
In today's society, where the demand for a multilingual and multicultural educational system is
increasing, the CLIL approach -Content and Language Integrated Learning- has made its way. It is
presented as an innovative methodology in which the acquisition of the second language occurs
naturally. Due to its great educational capacity, more centres are encouraged to implement it in their
classrooms, thus contributing to a significant change in the teaching of English language. This essay
analyses the antecedents and the five fundamental pillars on which it is based. Finally, it presents an
example of a Didactic Unit to teach Natural Science in the third year of Primary Education.
Keywords: CLIL (Content and Language Integrated Learning); bilingualism; 4Cs; language triptych;
Natural Science.
3
Development of CLIL activities for Primary Education: Energy and Matter
INDEX
INTRODUCTION 6
1. JUSTIFICACIÓN DEL TEMA 6
2. ANTECEDENTS 6
2.1. Bilingual education within the framework of European language policies 6
2.2. Methodology of bilingual teaching 7
3. WHAT IS CLIL? 8
3.1. Definition 9
3.2. CLIL objectives and principles 10
3.2.1. The 4Cs Framework 11
3.2.1.1. Content 12
3.2.1.2. Communication 13
3.2.1.3. Cognition 13
3.2.1.4. Culture 14
3.2.1.5. The 5Cs in Europe 15
3.2.2. Bloom’s Taxonomy 16
3.2.3. Cummins’ Quadrants 18
3.2.4. Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD) 21
3.2.5. The Language Triptych 23
3.2.5.1. Language of learning 24
3.2.5.2. Language for learning 25
3.2.5.3. Language through learning 25
CONCLUSION 56
REFERENCES 57
ANNEXES 61
A. Annex 1: Image of the Unit 5 61
4
Maite Izu Ventura
B. Annex 2: S.W 1 61
C. Annex 3: S.W 2 62
D. Annex 4: S.W 3 63
E. Annex 5: Titi 65
F. Annex 6: Manipulating the white sheet 66
G. Annex 7: Reversible changes 66
H. Annex 8: Combustion 67
I. Annex 9: Oxidation 67
J. Annex 10: S.W 4 68
K. Annex 11: Homogeneous and heterogeneous mixtures 68
L. Annex 12: Jigsaw groups (Cooke, n.d.) 69
M. Annex 13: S.W 5 69
N. Annex 14: Spider diagram 70
Ñ. Annex 15: S.W 6 70
O. Annex 16: Renewable and non-renewable energy 71
P. Annex 17: S.W 7 71
Q. Annex 18: S.W 8 72
R. Annex 19: S.W 9 72
S. Annex 20: S.W 10 73
5
Development of CLIL activities for Primary Education: Energy and Matter
INTRODUCTION
1. JUSTIFICACIÓN DEL TEMA
El presente trabajo de fin de grado Elaboración de actividades CLIL para Educación Primaria:
Energía y Materia, tal y como su título indica, tiene como centro de atención el diseño y creación de
actividades CLIL para la asignatura de Natural Science en Educación Primaria.
La principal motivación que impulsa la elección de este tema reside en el hecho de haber
cursado la Mención en Lengua Extranjera (Inglés), cuyas asignaturas me han dado a conocer un
enfoque distinto sobre la enseñanza de las lenguas extranjeras, en especial de la lengua inglesa. Así
pues, he decidido adentrarme en el estudio del CLIL para compaginar lo que yo pueda aportar de mi
humilde experiencia educativa vivida durante el Practicum II, utilizando la metodología CLIL, con lo que
investigadores y expertos han estudiado acerca de la enseñanza de las lenguas extranjeras a través de
este enfoque.
2. ANTECEDENTS
2.1. Bilingual education within the framework of European language policies
In the last 10 years, Europe has broken down its borders and has added many more member
states. According to The European Symposium on the Changing European Classroom – The Potential
of Plurilingual Education, held in March 2005 in cooperation with the Luxemburg Presidency, about
450 million people coming out of various nations, communities, social and cultural backgrounds and
from different language groups live and work in the European Union today.
The influx of refugees and immigrants has changed the typical European classroom into a
multinational environment consisting of students with plurilingual abilities (Attard Montalto, Walter,
Theodorou, and Chrysanthou, 2016). This new reality, where mobility and trans-border migration are
now commonplace and in which English has become a democratized and universalized lingua franca
for international communication (Jenkins, 2007), implies a need to seek new methods and strategies
to implement the teaching of a second language, in this case of English, in an effective and meaningful
way.
Thus, given the need to meet the expectations of the globalized world, European government
policies gave a decisive boost to multilingualism (Morrow, 2004). To overcome the limitations of a
monolingual ideology and promote linguistic diversity in multicultural societies, the EU1 Commission
adopted, in the Framework Strategy on Multilingualism (2005), the long-term objective of increasing
6
Maite Izu Ventura
multilingual students so that everyone acquires practical skills in two or more languages in addition to
his or her mother tongue. In other words, pupils should master at least two foreign languages at the
end of compulsory schooling, as one of the prerequisites for successful participation in the Member
States of the EU.
Consequently, in the 1970s, there was a translation of this new global aspiration to the
educational system that found response in bilingual school programs (Morrow, 2004). This fact
explains the currently growing need for bilingual programmes in Spain, considered a European leader
in the implementation of bilingual programs (Coyle, 2010, p.8). Since the 80’s, Spain has coexisted with
co-official languages such as Basque, Catalan, Galician and Valencian in compulsory schooling. This
practice has gradually created a bilingual mentality that has led to transferring the experience to this
new situation in which the language of the bilingual programs is usually English.
These bilingual programs include the training of teachers in both linguistic and methodological
aspects from the Education Departments of the different Autonomous Communities. The most
relevant initiatives are collected and documented in detail in the first part of CLIL in Spain (Lasagabaster
& Ruiz de Zarobe, 2010) and in CLIL across education levels: opportunities for all (Dafouz & Guerrini,
2009).
7
Development of CLIL activities for Primary Education: Energy and Matter
3. WHAT IS CLIL?
As we have mentioned previously, the process of European integration and the pressing
globalization trends have made the English language gain the status of today’s lingua franca, not only
in the European Union but also around the world. Consequently, the concern and need to learn English
has led to changes in the educational framework.
2 Additive bilingual: someone whose two languages combine in a complementary and enriching fashion.
3 Coordinate bilingual: someone whose two languages are learnt in distinctively separate contexts.
4 Early bilingual: someone who has acquired two languages early in childhood.
5 Recessive bilingual: someone who begins to feel some difficulty in either understanding or expressing him or herself with
8
Maite Izu Ventura
In recent years, the methodology of the second language has evolved, going from a traditional
approach, FLT (Foreign Language Teaching) in which the language itself was exclusively studied, to a
communicative approach in which the learning of the language is intended through the delivery of the
contents, using that second language as a vehicle for teaching the contents of certain subjects.
This change was supported by the Council of Europe, which established the main objective of
promoting multilingualism, and the consequent realization of an integrating language curriculum that
facilitates their educational practice in an efficient way. So, in the search for a common system that
would meet the strategic objectives of the European educational bodies for the promotion of foreign
language teaching, emerged, in 1994, an innovative methodological approach called CLIL.
Nikula, Dalton-Puffer, Llinares & Lorenzo (2016) explain that this educational policy, concerned
with promoting economic, social, and cultural well-being, has spread specially in Europe since mid-
1990s and draws on earlier models of bilingual education such as immersion and content-based
instruction. In the same way, this form of education supports effective learning of two or more
languages, and, since 1995, has explicitly supported CLIL as a curricular approach which can achieve
this.
The policy of the EU has led to the development of CLIL initiatives in many parts of Europe, at
pre-primary, primary, secondary, and tertiary levels. Ioannou-Georgiou and Pavlou (2011) think that
these initiatives, in addition to supporting good practice in schools and classrooms, provide training
and research opportunities which can guide the effective implementation of CLIL for the future.
3.1. Definition
The acronym CLIL ‘Content and Language Integrated Learning’, translated into Spanish as AICLE
‘Aprendizaje Integrado de Contenidos y Lengua Extranjera’, is not new in methodology. Conversely,
the term was adopted in 1994 (Marsh et al., 2001) within the European context to describe and further
design good practices that are achieved in different types of school environments where teaching and
learning take place in an additional language.
Before going into detail, it is important to know that learning a foreign language is different
from the mother tongue because a mother tongue is a huge system that surrounds the child, while the
foreign language belongs to people that are far from the pupil’s environment and with a different
culture. Therefore, the CLIL objective is precisely to make it nearer, to create an environment in which
students can communicate in this new language in a natural way, in a more different situation.
To begin, CLIL is an umbrella term for programmes that use a FL (foreign language) as a medium
of instruction. There are many authors who agree on this definition. For example, Darn (2007) refers
9
Development of CLIL activities for Primary Education: Energy and Matter
it as a dual-focused method where curricular content is taught through the medium of a FL, students
are learning both, content and language at the same time. Likewise, to Coyle et al., (2010) ‘CLIL is a
dual-focused educational approach in which an additional language is used for the learning and
teaching of both content and language’ (p.1). According to this general definition, we have to highlight
three essential aspects.
Firstly, CLIL is not a simply language-learning teaching approach. It does not consist of teaching
a subject in a second language to improve the linguistic competence of the students, but rather the
approach is oriented both to content learning and language learning of the subject studied. Secondly,
within the CLIL framework, content and language are learned in an integrated way. Whilst there is no
single model for CLIL, all the different variations share this common fundamental principle whereby
content and language learning are integrated. In this way, CLIL prepares students for working in a
plurilingual world. And finally, considering the definition given, it should be mentioned that in CLIL,
language is both a learning medium and a content. In fact, there is a simultaneous teaching and
learning of curricular contents and a foreign language, in which this second language becomes, at the
same time, an object and vehicle of learning. So, the main idea of CLIL is to use the English language
not only as a subject, but also as a vehicle to communicate.
In short, CLIL carries out a different methodological treatment of the language, focusing on
students learning a new language through the teaching of content of curricular subjects such as
Mathematics, History, Sciences, Arts, and Craft, etc. This allows learning a foreign language without
reducing the teaching time of other curricular subjects. Based on foregoing, CLIL constitutes an
enormous educational impact tool with extraordinary potential to increase language skills while
developing cognitive abilities.
10
Maite Izu Ventura
Professionals, therefore, must consider that CLIL is not simply a disguise for additional
language lessons. On the other hand, using CLIL does not mean that content teaching is simply
translated into a foreign language, but as Yessengaliyeva (2019) said, ‘they learn the language they
need for studying at the same time as they learn the subject’ (p.281).
As we can see, with CLIL, learning the content and learning the language are equally important.
Both are important curriculum subjects for the students, and they are developed and integrated slowly
but steadily. From this perspective, as we already said, language is used as a tool through which
students acquire the specific knowledge of a subject of study, and during this process, language
acquisition occurs simultaneously. This requires a ‘comprehensive methodology that transcends the
traditional dualism between content and language teaching’ (Meyer, 2010, p.26). This methodology is
based on 4 main pillars:
Coyle’s so-called 4Cs (2007, based on Mohan’s Knowledge Framework 1986).
11
Development of CLIL activities for Primary Education: Energy and Matter
Figure 1
The 4Cs framework for CLIL
Note: Adapted from The 4Cs conceptual framework for CLIL, Coyle, 2005, CLIL:
Planning tools for teachers.
As we can see in Figure 1, the 4Cs Framework integrates the four contextualized building
blocks. It starts with content and focuses on the interrelationship between content (subject matter),
communication (language learning and using), cognition (learning and thinking processes), and culture
(developing intercultural understanding and global citizenship) (Gierlinger, p.1).
3.2.1.1. Content
The content is the starting point of the planning process as it refers to the subject matter or
the CLIL theme. It is fundamental that the content of the topic, project, theme or syllabus leads the
way.
In considering the content, it is useful to think of the subject in two ways: the teaching
objectives and the learning outcomes. On the one hand, the teaching aims are what the teacher
intends to do, that is, the knowledge, skills and understanding which are intended to be taught and
developed. It provides opportunities to study content through different perspectives, which can lead
to achieving a deeper understanding of the subject. In accordance with Coyle (2008), content
introduced to students must be successful as well as progress in knowledge; this means that students
have to acquire new knowledge.
On the other hand, the learning outcomes focus on what students must be able to do and
understand at the end of each unit. Using the target language through CLIL may help learners to
understand the subject. This focus on content can prepare students for future studies and/or for their
12
Maite Izu Ventura
working life. So, at the heart of the learning process lies successful content or thematic learning and
the related acquisition of new knowledge, skills, and understanding.
3.2.1.2. Communication
It refers to students using the target language which occurs in interaction and learning in the
classroom to communicate their thoughts, opinions, attitudes, and discoveries about the lesson
content. So, language is a conduit for communication and for learning.
Coyle (2005) emphasized both speaking and writing as students ‘learn to use language and use
language to learn’ (p. 5). As we can observe, he distinguished between language learning and language
using as language learning emphasises on grammatical progression, whereas language using focuses
on the communication and learning demands of the moment.
In 2008, Coyle pointed out that communication goes farther than grammar because students
use the language not only to learn it, as in the language lessons, but also to communicate. He explained
that even if our grammar is faulty, we know very little words or our pronunciation is poor, we can
communicate reasonably successful in a language. Therefore, communication involves learners using
language in different ways.
Therefore, each language is formed by different types of language use. In CLIL, we also find
these differences. For example, Coyle et al., defined in 2010 a three-dimension language framework
used in CLIL. As we will explain later, this triptych distinguishes between language of, language for, and
language through.
3.2.1.3. Cognition
Acquiring subject knowledge, skills and understanding is related to learning and thinking, that
is, cognition. For Kiely, R. (2011), cognition ‘reflects the development of learning and thinking in the
subject context during the lesson, contributing to the linking new knowledge and skills to existing
understanding’ (p.28).
Likewise, Coyle (2008) stated that cognition is an important tool that makes CLIL effective, as
it creates adequate conditions for developing critical thinking skills, creative thinking skills, and
problem-solving skills. In this sense, students develop individual criteria of thought that allow them to
understand and build knowledge on their own. Hence, CLIL is not about transforming knowledge, but
about allowing individuals to construct their own understandings and be challenged.
13
Development of CLIL activities for Primary Education: Energy and Matter
We will see later that the Bloom’s Taxonomy, serves as a stimulus and guide for planning,
discussion and evaluating practice since it explores the relationship between cognitive processing
(learning) and knowledge acquisition (of content) particularly relevant to CLIL (Coyle et al., 2010).
3.2.1.4. Culture
The relationship between cultures and languages is complex. When we learn a new language,
we are also learning its culture and it requires tolerance and understanding (Coyle, 2008). Nowadays,
we have many opportunities to gain competence in intercultural awareness as we are continuously
exposed to different perspectives and views.
In education, CLIL plays an important role because it helps to develop intercultural knowledge,
awareness and understanding. For instance, in primary schools where there are children from several
transmigrant backgrounds, teachers use CLIL to facilitate cultural and linguistic adaptation processes.
So, students not only develop intercultural communication skills, but also, they learn about other
European countries, regions, or minority groups. That is the reason why culture is another essential
building block when dealing with CLIL, because intercultural awareness and learning are fundamental
to CLIL. Besides, when we understand ourselves and other cultures, the process of communication
with foreign people is more effective. In definitive, as Hall Edward (1959) described culture in the 21st
century means ‘diversity and dynamism because there is no culture of one as culture is communication
and communication is culture’ (p.186).
Regarding its implementation, the 4 C's work in synergy to provide students with optimal
learning and scaffolding conditions. In doing so, they take account of integrating content learning
(content and cognition) and language learning (communication and culture) within specific
contexts.On the other hand, in CLIL, the curriculum also presents a synergy of the teacher’s plan with
the learner’s authentic needs. Through balanced and learner-centred CLIL sessions, students have
many opportunities to apply knowledge and develop communication skills. However, it should be
specifically pointed out that CLIL is not about simply importing ‘foreign stuff, foreign ideas, foreign
textbooks’ as the founder of the term Marsh (Cambridge University Press ELT, 2010, 0m38s) explains,
but that the basis for a successful CLIL lesson is rooted in the 4 C’s model proposed by Coyle. Thus, the
correct methodological application of CLIL contemplate these four aspects illustrated in the diagram
of the four C’s (Coyle, 1999).
14
Maite Izu Ventura
Figure 2
The 5Cs in Europe.
If we compare the 4 C’s+1 framework with the initial one, we can observe two different words:
community and competence (the added C). Although it may seem that the term ‘community’ is new,
it is not. Some CLIL writers, such as Mehisto et al., (2008), prefer to use the term community rather
than culture to reflect the link between classroom learning and the wider social context of learning.
For example, Lear (2018) describes the community aspect as ‘the ability to communicate for real
purposes and spot the differences or similarities with students’ own language and culture’ (p.82).
15
Development of CLIL activities for Primary Education: Energy and Matter
Therefore, the added C is the concept of competence, which refers to ‘can-do statements’ made by
the students about the lesson content and skills or about new language once they have internalized a
new skill or ability (Montalto et al., 2016, p.21).
16
Maite Izu Ventura
Figure 3
Bloom's Wheel
Briefly, we can see in Figure 3 that the taxonomy is composed of 6 categories (thinking skills)
arranged in ascending order, from inferior or lowest order to higher order skills. Both Bloom’s
Taxonomy of Educational Objectives (Bloom, Englehart, Furst, Hill & Krathwohl, 1956) and later
Anderson and Krathwohl’s Revised version of Bloom’s revised Taxonomy of Educational Objectives
(2001) distinguished the following six distinctive categories of cognitive objectives: knowledge,
comprehension, application, analysis, synthesis and evaluation. Moreover, as we can see in the
diagram, the six skills are associated with a number of verbs that teachers can use as a guide to
promote critical thinking skills when they are designing tasks. By using the verbs, we can take any kind
of input and create critical thinking tasks around those verbs.
According to the Figure 4, LOTS includes recalling knowledge to identify, label, name or
describe things, while HOTS calls on the application, analysis or synthesis of knowledge, needed when
learners use new information or a concept in a new situation. Students should go through all these
phases, from the basic (lower) to the more complex (higher) order skills. A student must be able to
have a knowledge base first (knowledge), to be able to understand (comprehension) it as a whole. In
addition, they have to apply it (application) to be able to analyse it (analysis) and, thus, develop a
synthesis capacity (synthesis) that will lead them to self-evaluation or self-assessment.
17
Development of CLIL activities for Primary Education: Energy and Matter
Figure 4
Note: Adapted from High Order Thinking Skills and Low Order Thinking Skills,
Zamacona, M., 2014,
https://mayolazamacona.wordpress.com/2014/11/02/blooms-taxonomy/
According to Chamot and O’Malley (1994, p. 41-44), in CLIL due to the integration of academic
content with language, the development of critical thinking skills is associated with the development
of language functions, too. In Bloom’s Taxonomy, the higher the slabs are the more complex language
and vocabulary it requires, so it is possible that students might not know the specific vocabulary and
expressions used. That is why it is necessary to provide a suitable scaffold for the use of language,
creating bridges from the language pupils already know and that allow students to modify and adapt
what they know to what they should know.
So, the key concepts of CLIL methodology are essentially two:
Scaffolding: to make language easier for learners.
Taxonomy: to engage learners with different kinds of tasks.
18
Maite Izu Ventura
language that is frequently taught in standard learning classes and that comprises the skills necessary
to function in conversational situations (Bentley, 2010). On the other hand, Cummins defines the
Academic Cognitive Linguistic Competence, as ‘the extent to which an individual has access to and
command of the oral and written academic registers of schooling’ (Cummins, 2000, p. 67).
This distinction between BICS and CALP arises from the early work of Cummins (1984) in which
he demonstrated his ideas on the development of a second language in a simple matrix called the
Cummins’ Matrix, composed of four quadrants resulting from the crossing of vertical (cognitive
demand at the linguistic level) and horizontal axes the level of contextualization), as we can see in the
Figure 5.
Figure 5
If we analyse the Figure 5, in BICS language learning is contextualized, that is, it relies on very
specific and close situations (Lorenzo et al., 2011), so that the tasks associated are usually less
demanding from a cognitive point of view. Nevertheless, in CALP, the language is more demanding
from this perspective, since it corresponds to the register used in the teaching of curricular content,
which is more abstract and formal. Consequently, cognitive-academic language expresses and requires
higher-level thinking skills (HOTS) such as applying, analysing and creating (Llull, et al., 2016).
In CLIL settings, the transition from BICS to CALP is progressive. Collier found that ‘it may take
five to seven years for second language learners to become proficient in academic language skills’
(Dale, L., Van der Es, W., Tanner, R., & Timmers, S., 2010, p.46). That is why most of the classroom
19
Development of CLIL activities for Primary Education: Energy and Matter
activities are placed on quadrants 2 and 3 of the matrix, as these tasks are accessible in terms of
language and cognitive demands. However, in a sequence of CLIL activities, there should be a
progression towards quadrant 4, as these tasks require to master the language and are cognitively
demanding at the same time. For this reason, teachers should plan the activities carefully and guide
students to advance gradually. The development of CALP, in short, is one of the challenges proposed
by CLIL so that students can build a solid academic linguistic base that allows them to favour the
acquisition of curricular content.
Apart from this, Cummins developed, in 1983, the ‘Dual Iceberg’ theory to represent the
interaction between BICS, CALP, and cognitive processes. By using the image of an iceberg, he
described how the bilingual learners’ brains use two languages to make sense of their world. For
Cummins, an iceberg can be compared to a person who learns a language because an individual who
is involved in language learning is like a ‘dual-iceberg’, with parts of their knowledge invisible, under
the waterline, and parts of it visible, above the waterline.
In the next paragraph, especially in Figure 6, we will see a picture that explains the Cummins’
Iceberg Model of Language Interdependence.
Figure 6
If we look at the Figure 6 more closely, we will observe that both tips of the iceberg contain
the two or more languages (L1 and L2) that bilingual learners can use to communicate. Underneath
20
Maite Izu Ventura
the waterline, there are the experiences and knowledge of the students, as well as an understanding
of how language is used to express their thoughts, which is independent of the language they use. That
is why, Cummins (2005), stated that the two or more languages used by an individual, although it may
seem they are different on the surface, function through the same central cognitive system, hence the
name Common Underlying Proficiency.
As Dale. L, et al., (2010) expose, ‘learners already have knowledge and skills in one or more
languages’ (p.255), therefore, activating CLIL makes them aware of it and transfer everything they
know from one language to another. For example, students may know the concept of ‘contemporary’
and the word ‘contemporary’, in Spanish. Nevertheless, this knowledge may not be visible in the
second language, as they do not know the pronunciation and spelling of the English word
/kənˈtɛmpərəri/, where the stress is on a different syllable from Spanish contemporáneo. In this case,
what students need to add is not the understanding of the concept, just the label (the word
contemporary and how to pronounce and spell it). If learners know neither the concept of
‘contemporary’ nor the language used to describe it, they will need to develop both concept and
language at the same time.
Therefore, what differentiates the CUP theory is that it does not separate two areas for
different languages, rather bilingual learners store two languages together and the knowledge is linked
and can interact; and this way of understanding bilingualism is also known as the ‘iceberg analogy’.
21
Development of CLIL activities for Primary Education: Energy and Matter
peers’ (p.133). The author affirmed that children learn best in the Zone of Proximal Development,
when, with help of someone more ‘expert’ than themselves, they can understand and do new things.
So, as we can see in Figure 7, the ZPD is when children are ready for the next bit of learning.
Figure 7
Many people use this term to describe the role of the teachers, as ´they provide
successive levels of temporary support that help students reach higher levels of achievement
than they would be able to achieve without assistance. The supportive strategies are gradually
removed when they are no longer needed´ (Ball et al., 2015, p.306). That is to say, teachers
support students, providing the framework to hang their knowledge on, just as we use
scaffolding to support a structure that is being built. However, we must know that there is no
single zone for each individual and that students can create a ZPD for any domain of skill.
Besides, as Rogoff (1982) explains, there are cultural variations in the competencies that
children must acquire by interacting with society. For instance,
Boys in Micronesia, where sailing a canoe is a fundamental skill, will have a ZPD for the skills of
navigation, created in interaction with sailing masters. A girl in the Navajo weaving community will
have experiences in a zone not quite like any encountered by the daughters of Philadelphia.
Whatever the activity, in the ZPD we find assistance is provided by the teacher, the adult, the
expert, the more capable peer. (Tharp and Gallimore, 1998, p. 96)
22
Maite Izu Ventura
Finally, Davies (2011) explains that cognition and content are interleaved in the CLIL process
being slantingly linked to Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD)and, thus, accentuating the
cognitive processing of language learning suited to each learner’s comfort zone. That is why, following
the scaffolding strategy allows learning in which there is a progressive evolution and where new
knowledge is built from what children already know and master.
23
Development of CLIL activities for Primary Education: Energy and Matter
Figure 8
Note: Adapted from the Language Triptych, Coyle et al., 2010, p.36.
The triptych does not replace the grammatical progression, but rather enhances it. It supports
the students in the use of the language through the analysis of the vehicular language used in CLIL,
from three interrelated perspectives. Therefore, language is a means of communication and learning
that can be described as: ‘Language learning and language using’, in Spanish ‘aprender a usar el
lenguaje y utilizar el lenguaje para aprender’ (Coyle, D et al., 2010, p.32). Communication in this sense
goes beyond the grammatical system. For this purpose, we can clearly recognize the three perspectives
of language learning used in the CLIL classroom: language of language for learning and language
through learning.
24
Maite Izu Ventura
appropriate to the content in a meaningful way, which can then be further explored for grammatical
cohesion in the language class.
Nonetheless, as Coyle et al., (2010) say ‘this does not imply that second or additional language
lessons should be reduced to grammar lessons, but that a more varied menu can be created to provide
a richer diet’ (p.37). For the subject teacher, it requires greater explicit awareness of the linguistic
demands of the subject or content to take account of literacy and oracy in the vehicular language.
25
Development of CLIL activities for Primary Education: Energy and Matter
The challenge for teachers is how to capitalize on, recycle and extend new language so that it
becomes embedded in the learners’ repertoire. Language progression in this sense can be defined as
the systematic development of emerging language from specific contexts, supported by structured
grammatical awareness, using known language in new ways, accessing unknown language and so on.
In the Energy and matter project, language through learning may emerge if, for example,
during the mini-project preparation, students working in groups need language to express a new idea
which they have constructed, and which is not in their resources; this might involve dictionary work
and teacher support.
26
Maite Izu Ventura
and we will encourage them to think about when, where, and how we use energy every day. In
addition, pupils will study renewable and non-renewable energy sources and will become aware of the
importance of energy conservation.
Pupils will begin by refreshing what they have learned about common materials and their
properties and demonstrate this understanding by means of a picture. Then, they will go on to apply
their knowledge of properties while exploring different physical and chemical changes of matter.
Likewise, they will realize what they already know about energy and they will be able to extend their
knowledge too.
Then, pupils will be introduced to mixtures and learn that almost everything around us
contains two or more different materials. This lesson provides plenty of opportunities for pupils to
make and separate mixtures with a variety of materials. By its part, student will explore the different
types of energy that we find all around us in our daily lives. This followed by an explanation of
renewable and non-renewable energy sources, focusing on how each one is obtained and how they
produce energy.
Likewise, pupils will practise vocabulary that they have previously learned, as well as develop
specific scientific vocabulary about matter, materials, energy, and a variety of processes. As we already
know, in CLIL, it is very important to focus on language learning. So, to keep all the new or tricky
vocabulary words, connectors and grammatical structures learned, students will complete a Glossary.
In this way, they will be able to look the words up when necessary and it will be a useful tool to study.
Besides, they will continue to work on important skills including observation, classification, choosing
the correct tool for different purposes, and the collection and presentation of data. Regarding the
evaluation, both the language and the content are going to be assessed in three different ways,
through continuous assessment, formative assessment and an end-of-unit test (annex 20).
27
Development of CLIL activities for Primary Education: Energy and Matter
Table 1.
28
Maite Izu Ventura
29
Development of CLIL activities for Primary Education: Energy and Matter
Table 2
States of matter
Materials:
Procedure: the aim of the first session is to develop our pupils’ observation skills and find out what
they already know about the topic of the unit. Before introducing the topic, we will give them and
explain that they will have to complete the Glossary with the vocabulary bank.
30
Maite Izu Ventura
31
Development of CLIL activities for Primary Education: Energy and Matter
of matter’ what the above objects are made of. To facilitate the
description, we will previously establish the meaning
of the six materials in the glossary (glass, plastic,
paper, metal, wood and fabric) that we will
complement by adding a useful language box.
Within the box, they will find two examples of
material descriptions that students can use as a
guide.
32
Maite Izu Ventura
Annexes:
Annex 1
Annex 2
Table 3
33
Development of CLIL activities for Primary Education: Energy and Matter
34
Maite Izu Ventura
Table 4
Materials:
Images of elements in the different states of the matter (gas, liquid and solid).
The mystery box:
3 empty containers
A differently shaped container
Oxygen
Water
Beans
Procedure: In this session, pupils will explore the concept of matter. We will introduce them to its
three stages (gas, liquid, solid) and explore the characteristics of each.
35
Development of CLIL activities for Primary Education: Energy and Matter
Activity 2 After having identified the three states of matter, Class group 35
we will give students the opportunity and minutes
‘Does
autonomy to delve into the topic on their own. For
anything
that, we will present them a hands-on experiment
change?’
in which students will have to answer how each
state of matter will fill each container according to
its shape and volume. Like scientists, they will have
to record the results, following the steps of the
Scientific Method (explained in the S.W 2 and that
we will comment in that moment).
36
Maite Izu Ventura
Activity 3 We will use the last 5 minutes of the class to Class group 5
indirectly introduce the content of the next session: minutes
‘Titi’
physical and chemical changes. For that, we will
bring a new friend called Titi.
Scaffolding tips: I have briefly described and explained the steps of the scientific method so that
children know what to write in each phase. Besides, I have included some useful language boxes
with the main structures to facilitate their English expression.
Class assessment: the advantage of doing hands-on experiments is that children receive instant
feedback, that is, they can test by their own whether their hypothesis was correct or not. They
37
Development of CLIL activities for Primary Education: Energy and Matter
like watching the results and often enjoy seeing something that does not change that they
thought would do.
Annexes:
Annex 3
Annex 4
Annex 5
Table 5
COGNITION
Teaching objectives Learning outcomes
With help, to plan and carry out simple They will remember the steps of the scientific
experiments to study chemical changes in method.
common materials.
Pupils will orally reproduce the experiments
taking into account the discourse markers to
make the speech more polite.
38
Maite Izu Ventura
39
Development of CLIL activities for Primary Education: Energy and Matter
Table 6
Materials:
White sheets
Lighter
A pan with water
Procedure: in this session, students will learn about how matter changes. Pupils will study ways that
the properties of matter can change including changes in shape, size, and state. Then pupils will go on
to explore two types of physical changes: change of state (that we will see in the next session) and
shape and two types of chemical changes: combustion and oxidation.
40
Maite Izu Ventura
41
Development of CLIL activities for Primary Education: Energy and Matter
42
Maite Izu Ventura
Class assessment: this session does not have a specific assessment. The idea here is to give
continuous feedback to our students, for example, when they answer the questions and the
worksheet. As they are going to comment on all the answers, including the ones on the
worksheet, we will be able to correct any mistake and guide the class.
Annexes:
Annex 6
Annex 7
Annex 8
Annex 9
43
Development of CLIL activities for Primary Education: Energy and Matter
Table 7
44
Maite Izu Ventura
Table 8
Mixtures
MATTER: Mixtures
Materials:
Procedure: in this session, students will learn that almost everything around us is a mixture containing
two or more types of matter. Besides, they will observe how in some mixtures they can see these
different types of matter, and how in others, they cannot. Finally, we will also focus on the three key
methods to separate these different kinds of matter.
45
Development of CLIL activities for Primary Education: Energy and Matter
46
Maite Izu Ventura
Annexes:
47
Development of CLIL activities for Primary Education: Energy and Matter
Annex 10
Annex 11
Table 9
48
Maite Izu Ventura
Table 10
Types of energy
Materials:
Glue
Carboards
A template of a spider diagram
Procedure: in this session, students will learn about different types of energy that we find around us
in our daily lives, and the effect these have on matter. We will start refreshing their prior knowledge
about energy, as a general concept, with a concrete example; we will tell children that every morning
we have a healthy breakfast because it gives us energy for our day. Then, pupils will have to imagine
how they would feel if they had not had breakfast.
49
Development of CLIL activities for Primary Education: Energy and Matter
50
Maite Izu Ventura
Scaffolding tips: to avoid students presenting inaccurate or misleading information, the teacher
will go through the groups asking questions about the content. For the spider diagram, we will only
show them a template as we want them to organise information, summarize it and classify it on
their own.
Class assessment: the teacher will give students checklist (annex 15) to review their draft spider
diagram. Once they have corrected all the mistakes, with the teacher’s supervision, they will be
able to pass the content to the cardboard.
Annexes:
Annex 12
Annex 13
Annex 14
Annex 15
51
Development of CLIL activities for Primary Education: Energy and Matter
Table 11
52
Maite Izu Ventura
Table 12
Sources of energy
Materials:
Chormebooks
Procedure: in this session, pupils will learn about where energy comes from and which sources of
energy can be classified as renewable and non-renewable. They will also learn about the impact of
renewable sources of energy on the environment.
53
Development of CLIL activities for Primary Education: Energy and Matter
trios’’ In this case, the set 1 will contain the key concepts,
the set 2 the definitions and the set 3 some pictures.
Therefore, students will have to match the key
concept with its definition and picture(s).
54
Maite Izu Ventura
Scaffolding tips: for the activity 3, we can give them some websites to facilitate the searching
process in Internet.
Class assessment: the solar panel’s worksheet will be evaluated individually. Students will have a
mark from 1-10 and they will be able to see it in their mails.
Annexes:
Annex 16
Annex 17
Annex 18
Annex 19
55
Development of CLIL activities for Primary Education: Energy and Matter
CONCLUSION
Durante el desarrollo de este trabajo de fin de grado, he estudiado y comprobado, de primera
mano, el gran potencial de la metodología CLIL, que está ganando popularidad tanto en Europa como
a nivel internacional.
Tras analizar exhaustivamente sus principales características y principios y tras plantear una
serie de actividades y recursos enfocados a la enseñanza de las Ciencias Naturales, he tenido la
oportunidad de llevar a cabo mi propia Unidad Didáctica en el centro de prácticas, un colegio bilingüe.
Cuando se utiliza CLIL en un programa bilingüe, el contenido del programa de estudios y la adquisición
de la lengua inglesa están integrados. Por ello, en este TFG, los temas, el lenguaje y las habilidades de
pensamiento crítico se enseñan simultáneamente.
En cuanto a la puesta en práctica, estoy muy satisfecha con los resultados obtenidos. A pesar
de tener un alumnado con un bajo nivel de inglés, he conseguido despertar su interés por la energía y
la materia. De esta forma, mediante la combinación de actividades prácticas y teóricas, y haciendo
especial hincapié en el uso de la lengua, todos los estudiantes han podido acceder al conocimiento sin
importar su condición. Por todo ello, considero que el CLIL no es un salto hacia lo desconocido, es un
salto al siglo XXI.
56
Maite Izu Ventura
REFERENCES
Baïdak, N., Balcon, M. y Motiejunaite, A. (2017). Eurydice Brief: Key Data on Teaching Languages at
School in Europe -2017 Edition. European Commission: Publications Office.
Ball, P., Kelly, K., & Clegg, J. (2015). Putting CLIL into Practice. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Bentley, K. (2010). The TKT Course. CLIL Module. United Kingdom: Cambridge University.
Byram, M., Nichols, A., & Stevens, D. (Eds.). (2001). Developing intercultural competence in
practice (Vol. 1). Multilingual Matters.
Cambridge University Press ELT. (12 November 2010). David Marsh on CLIL [Video]. Youtube.
https://youtu.be/-Czdg8-6mJA
Clotilde, B. M., & Andrea, C. (2016). CLIL & IBSE methodologies in a chemistry learning unit. European
Journal of Research and Reflection in Educational Sciences Vol, 4(8).
Cooke, A. Expert groups [Image]. Retrieved 7 May 2021, from
https://csl570cooke.weebly.com/content-reading-tools-during-reading.html.
Cooper, R. (1984). Language, 60(3), 633-636. doi:10.2307/414002.
Coyle, D. (2005). CLIL: Planning tools for teachers. Nottingham: University of Nottingham.
Coyle, D., Hood, P. y Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL Content and Language Integrating Learning. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Coyle, Hood & Marsh (2010). In Lynch, G. (2015). Introducing Content and Language Integrated
Learning in Study Abroad Programs. 金沢星稜大学論集= Journal of Kanazawa Seiryo
University, 48(2), 69-73. Retrieved from:
http://www.seiryou.ac.jp/u/education/gakkai/e_ronsyu_pdf/No125/09_lynch_Introducing_C
ontent_125.pdf
Cummins, J. (2000) Language power and pedagogy: Bilingual children in the crossfire. Clevedon:
Multilingual Matters.
Dafouz, E. & Guerrini, M (Eds.). (2009). CLIL across education levels: Experiences from Primary,
Secondary and Tertiary Contexts. Madrid: Richmond Publishing.
Dale, L., Van der Es, W., Tanner, R., & Timmers, S. (2010). CLIL skills. ICLON, Universiteit Leiden.
Darn, S. (2007). Content and Language Integrated Learning–Potential and Practice. British Council.
Davies, J. R (2011). “Second-language acquisition and the information age: how social software has
created a new model of learning” TESL Canada Journal, 28/2:1-15.
57
Development of CLIL activities for Primary Education: Energy and Matter
Díez, G. (2013). Dos métodos de enseñanza del bilingüismo en Educación Primaria. Estudio
comparativo. Universidad Internacional de La Rioja, Logroño. Recuperada de
http://reunir.unir.net/handle/123456789/1587
European Agency for Development in Special Needs Education (2003) Special Needs Education in
Europe, Odense: European Agency for Development in Special Needs Education.
Eurydice (2009) Integrating Immigrant Children into Schools in Europe, Brussels: Eurydice.
Cambridge University Press ELT. (12 November 2010). David Marsh on CLIL [Video]. Youtube. (311)
David Marsh on CLIL - YouTube
Gibbons, P. (1991). Learning to learn in a second language. Newtown, Australia: Primary English
Teaching Association.
Gierlinger, E. (s. f.). The 4 C’s model. Retrieved from https://clilingmesoftly.wordpress.com/clil-
models-3/the-4-cs-model-docoyle/
Hall Edward T. (1959). The Silent Language. New York: Doubleday
Hanesová, D. (2014). Development of critical and creative thinking skills in CLIL. Journal of language
and cultural education, 2(2), 33-51.
Herbert Marsh, Kit-Tai Hau, Chit-Kwong Kong; Late Immersion and Language of Instruction in Hong
Kong High Schools: Achievement Growth in Language and Nonlanguage Subjects. Harvard
Educational Review 1 September 2000; 70 (3): 302–347.
doi: https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.70.3.gm047588386655k5
Ioannou-Georgiou, S., & Pavlou, P. (2011). Guidelines for CLIL implementation in primary and pre-
primary education. Cyprus: Cyprus Pedagogical Institute.
Jenkins, J. (2007). English as a Lingua Franca: Attitude and Identity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lasagabaster, D. & Ruiz de Zarobe, Y. (Eds.). (2010). CLIL in Spain: Implementation, Results and Teacher
Training. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Library.
58
Maite Izu Ventura
Lear, D. W., & Abbott, A. R. (2008). Foreign language professional standards and CSL: Achieving the 5
C’s. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 14 (2), 76-86.
Llull, J., Fernández, R., Johnson, M. y Peñafiel, E. (2016). Planning for CLIL: Designing effective lessons
for the bilingual classroom. Madrid: Editorial CCS.
Lorenzo, F., Trujillo, F. y Vez, J. (2011). Educación Bilingüe: Integración de Contenidos y Segundas
Lenguas. Madrid: Editorial Síntesis, S. A.
Zamacona, M. (2014). High Order Thinking Skills and Low Order Thinking Skills [Image]. Retrieved from
https://mayolazamacona.wordpress.com/2014/11/02/blooms-taxonomy/
Madrid, D., & Julius, S. (2020). Profiles of Students in Bilingual University Degree Programs Using
English as a Medium of Instruction in Spain. PROFILE: Issues in Teacher’s Professional
Development, 22 (2), 79-94.
Marsh, D., Maljers, A., & Hartiala, A. K. (2001). Profiling European CLIL Classrooms. Jyväskylä, Finland:
Centre for Applied Language Studies.
McLeod, S. (2018). Zone of Proximal Development [Image]. Retrieved from
https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Vygotsky-Zone-of-Proximal-Development-Source-
McLeod-2018-7-from-more-knowledgeable_fig1_332342953.
McLoughlin, A., Riach, M., & Sadovy, B. (2019). Natural Science, Primary 3. Zaragoza: ByME.
Meyer, O. (2010). Towards Quality CLIL: Successful planning and teaching strategies. Pulso, 33, 11-29.
Recuperado 5 mayo de 2018, https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/3311569.pdf
Montalto, S. A., Walter, L., Theodorou, M., & Chrysanthou, K. (2016). The CLIL guidebook. Lifelong
Learning Program. Recovered from
https://www.languages.dk/archive/clil4u/book/CLIL%20Book%20En.pdf
Montalto, S. A., Walter, L., Theodorou, M., & Chrysanthou, K., (2016). The 5Cs [Image]. Retrieved from
http://www.languages.dk
Montalto, S. A., Walter, L., Theodorou, M., & Chrysanthou, K., (2016). Bloom's Wheel [Image].
Retrieved from http://www.languages.dk
Morrow, K. (Ed.). (2004). Insights from the common European framework. Oxford University Press.
Nikula T, Dalton-Puffer C., Llinares A., Lorenzo F. (2016). Conceptualizing Integration in CLIL and
Multilingual Education. Multilingual Matters, 272 p.
59
Development of CLIL activities for Primary Education: Energy and Matter
Pineda, U. R., Quishpe, D. C., & Candungog, H. A. (2019, May). The Use of CLIL to Teach English and
Subjects Related to Teaching Practice at UNAE, Ecuador. In 9na Edición de la Conferencia
Científica Internacional de la Universidad de Holguín.
Smile and Learn. (9 July 2020). Types of Energy for Kids-Renewable and Non-Renewable energies
[Video]. Youtube. https://youtu.be/w16-Uems2Qo.
Teaching critical thinking using Bloom’s Taxonomy. (2021). Retrieved 2 April 2021, from
https://www.cambridge.org/elt/blog/2014/04/18/teaching-critical-thinking-using-blooms-
taxonomy/
Tharp, R., & Gallimore, R. (1998). A theory of teaching as assisted performance. Learning relationships
in the classroom, 93-110.
Van de Craen P. (2006). Content and language integrated learning, culture of education and learning
theories, 214 p.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1980). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard
university press.
Wei, L. (2000). Dimensions of bilingualism. The bilingualism reader, 3, 25.
Wei, R. & Feng, J. (2015) Implementing CLIL for young learners in an EFL context beyond Europe.
English Today, 31(1): 55-60.
Yessengaliyeva AM, T. (2019). On the application of the CLIL method in teaching foreign
languages. Eurasian Journal of Philology: Science and Education, 173 (1), 279-286. doi:
10.26577 / EJPh.2019.v173.i1.ph40.
60
Maite Izu Ventura
ANNEXES
All the students’ worksheets are also available in my Drive folder called TFG Maite Izu Ventura,
Students’ Worksheets. You can access it by clicking on this links:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1cdsBkEhA0_vjuJANOP20ILKyuvArw3Al/view?usp=sharing. To
facilitate reading I have also added the links on each individual annex.
B. Annex 2: S.W 1
61
Development of CLIL activities for Primary Education: Energy and Matter
C. Annex 3: S.W 2
62
Maite Izu Ventura
D. Annex 4: S.W 3
63
Development of CLIL activities for Primary Education: Energy and Matter
64
Maite Izu Ventura
E. Annex 5: Titi
65
Development of CLIL activities for Primary Education: Energy and Matter
66
Maite Izu Ventura
H. Annex 8: Combustion
I. Annex 9: Oxidation
67
Development of CLIL activities for Primary Education: Energy and Matter
68
Maite Izu Ventura
69
Development of CLIL activities for Primary Education: Energy and Matter
70
Maite Izu Ventura
(Renewable 3:34-4:47) and Non-renewable (6:17-7:41). To watch the video subtitled we have to
click on the bottom left on CC (and the subtitles will appear). We may have to select the English
version, which appears next to the CC. As it is a YouTube video, we can also slow it down
(settings/speed/0’75) so that students can hear and read it quietly.
71
Development of CLIL activities for Primary Education: Energy and Matter
72
Maite Izu Ventura
73