GEC 3 Inductive and Deductive Reasoning
GEC 3 Inductive and Deductive Reasoning
Problem Solving
and
Reasoning
MODULE 3
The Nature of Mathematics: Problem Solving and Reasoning
3.1 Introduction
Central to the study of mathematics is its ability to solve problems even
outside the field. Different professions deal with different problems. Most
professionals are required to have good problem solving skills. In the
previous module, you built a clear understanding of mathematics as a
language and improved your skills in translating mathematical sentences to
symbols. This skill is so important for you to become a better problem
solver.
In this module, our main focus is on how you solve a problem in a
systematic manner.
3.2 Learning Outcomes
After finishing this module, you are expected to
If you pick the number 5, the procedure will give a result of 10. For 6, it
will give 12; for 7, 14; for 10, 20; and for 100, 200. We observe that the
resulting numbers are twice the original number. Thus, we conjecture that
the process will produce a number which is twice the original.
We used inductive reasoning in making a conjecture in the previous
example. We must take note that though it can be helpful to use inductive
reasoning to arrive at a conclusion, extra care must be observed when
performing procedure. Conclusions based on inductive reasoning may not
be correct. The following example illustrates this instance.
Example 3. Consider the polynomial 𝑛2 + 19𝑛 − 19 where 𝑛 is a counting
number.
𝑛 𝑛2 + 19𝑛 − 19
2 23
3 47
4 73
5 101
6 131
7 163
𝑛 𝑛2 + 19𝑛 − 19
8 23
9 47
10 73
11 101
12 131
We see that the results are consistent and that our conjecture
seems correct. If we continue checking on the next results, we get 397,
443, 491, 541, 593, and 647. All these numbers are prime. However, if
𝑛 = 19, we get 703 which is the product of 19 and 37. This makes us
conclude that our conjecture is incorrect.
Example 4. Consider a circle and dots on the circle. What we do is
connect each dot to all other dots so that we draw all possible line
segments. After this, we count the number of regions formed inside the
circle. The first five results are given in Figure 3.1.
Figure 3.1
Maximum number of regions formed by connecting dots on a circle
Number of dots 1 23 4 5 6
Maximum number of regions 1 24 8 16 ?
Figure 3.2
Maximum number of regions formed by connecting 6 dots on a circle
In itself, inductive reasoning is not a valid method of proof.
Observing that a pattern exists in a number of situations does not mean
that the pattern is true for all situations. However, the inductive way is
still valuable because it allows us to form ideas on what we observed
which leads us to come up with a hypothesis.
A statement is true if it is true for all cases. If you can find one case
where the statement is not true, then it is considered a false statement.
The instance for which the statement becomes false is called a counter-
example. One can verify that a statement is false by using a counter-
example. This is illustrated in the next example.
Solution.
Solution.
4𝑛 + 6
Divide the sum by 2 = 2𝑛 + 3
2
Subtract 3 2𝑛 + 3 − 3 = 2𝑛
John, Jenny, Sheila, and Jason were recently elected as new class
officers (president, vice president, secretary, treasurer) in a National
High School. From the following clues, determine which position each
holds.
1. Jason is younger than the president but older than the treasurer.
2. John and the secretary are both the same age, and they are the
youngest members of the group.
Solution.
From clue 1, Jason is neither the president nor the treasurer. We put a
mark “X” on positions Jason do not hold.
X+Y=Y+X
We should see from example 1 that sentences are true, such as “ Human
beings are special kinds of animals” or some sentences are false , such as “
There is no sand in a dessert.”
There are also sentences which cannot be classified as true or false,
such as “ Do you like geometry?”Sentences (d), (f), and (h) are not
statements.
Deductive
Given Conditions Reasoning Conclusion
2. Deductive
Given Conditions Reasoning Conclusion
Deductive
Given Conditions Reasoning Conclusion
8 is divisible by 2.
1.
2. Deductive
Given Conditions Reasoning Conclusion
i. Any triangle with 2 equal
sides is isosceles. ABC is isosceles
ii. In ABC, AB=AC
3. Deductive
Given Conditions Reasoning Conclusion
i. Any triangle with 2 equal
An Equiateral triangle is
sides is isosceles. isosceles
ii. An Equilateral triangle has
three equal sides.
In this section, our main concern is to learn how to prove mathematical statements using the deductive
approach. It is important that we learn how to identify the given conditions, the conclusion (the statement
to be proven and the tools we can use in reasoning, such as related theorems or formulas.
Deductive Reasoning is the process of using facts, definitions, rules, or previously proven principle, until
we reach a conclusion.
LEARNING ACTIVITY 4
Write down the conclusion to each statement using the deductive reasoning.(Note: There may be
different ways to express the conclusion in some expressions.
1.Given Conditions;
i. Mirage is a kind of optical illusion created by refraction of sunlight.
ii. There is no sunlight at night.
Conclusion;_________________________________________________
2. Given conditions:
i. On a horizontal number line, the larger a number is, the further to the right it will be.
ii. -700 is less than -7
Conclusion:____________________________________________________
3.Given conditions:
i. The two diagonals of a rhombus are perpendicular to each other.
ii. A square is a kind of rhombus.
Conclusion:____________________________________________________
4.Given conditions:
i. A reduced figure has a scale factor less than 1.
ii. An elephant shown on a computer monitor is reduced in size.
Conclusion:____________________________________________________
3.3.2 Problem Solving with Patterns
3.3.2.1 Terms of a Sequence
From the table, we see that the first differences are not the same
since 14 − 5 = 9, 27 − 14 = 13, 44 − 27 = 17, and 65 − 44 = 21. Thus, we
check on the second differences and observe if we see a pattern. In this
case, the second differences are all the same. We have 13 − 9 = 4, 17 − 13
= 4, and 21 − 17 = 4. The common second difference is 4.
Since we have found a common second difference, we shall be
working upward to get 4 + 21 = 25 and then 25 + 65 = 90. The following
table provides the illustration on how we get the next term of the
sequence. Thus, in this example, the next term is 90.
Sequence 5 14 27 44 65 90
First difference 9 13 17 21 25
Second difference 4 4 4 4
Example 8. Use a difference table to predict the next term in the sequence.
2, 7, 24, 59, 118, 207, …
Solution.
Sequence 2 7 24 59 118 207 332
First differences 5 17 35 59 89 125
Second differences 12 18 24 30 36
Third differences 6 6 6 6
Learning Activity 5
Direction. Figure out the next number in the sequence using a difference
table as your guide.
Start Here:
1. 1, 7, 17, 31,49,71, …
2. 10, 10, 12, 16, 22, 30,…
3. −1, 4, 21, 56, 115,204, …
4. 9, 4, 3,12,37, 84, …
5. 17, 15, 25, 53, 105,187, …
𝑎1 = 3(1)2 + 1 = 4,
𝑎2 = 3(2)2 + 2 = 14,
𝑎3 = 3(3)2 + 3 = 30,
which means that the first term is 4; second term is 14; and third term is
30.
a. What is the 𝑛𝑡ℎ-term formula for the number of tiles in the 𝑛𝑡ℎ figure
of the sequence?
b. How many tiles are in the eighth figure of the sequence?
c. Which figure will consist exactly 320 tiles?
Solution.
b. Using the formula we derived from (a), we can get the number of
tiles in the eighth term of the sequence. In this case, 𝑛 = 8 and 𝑎8
= 3(8) − 1 = 24 − 1 = 23 tiles.
3𝑛 − 1 = 320
3𝑛 = 321
𝑛 = 107
Do you have your own way of solving this problem? It will help if you
write your own solution and compare the results.
Arithmetic Sequence
Geometric Sequence
can be expressed as
Learning Activity 5
Direction. Find the 𝑛𝑡ℎ-term formula for the sequence with the given
representation below.
A great discovery solves a great problem but there is a grain of discovery in the solution of any problem. Your
problem may be modest; but if it challenges your curiosity and brings into play your inventive faculties, and if you solve it
by your own means, you may experience the tension and enjoy the triumph of discovery.
George Polya
For a mathematician, the answer to a mathematical problem is
important. Equally important is the study of methods and rules for
discovery and invention. This is called heuristics.
One highly acceptable method to problem solving is designed by
George Polya (1887-1985). The basic problem-solving strategy that Polya
advocated consisted of four steps: understand the problem; devise a
plan; carry out the plan; and review the solution.
We will discuss each step by giving some guide on how we can complete
the problem solving process devised by George Polya.
3.3.3.1 Understand the Problem
We must have a clear understanding of the problem. In this part,
we may list the given information. Essential to this part is the ability to
identify what is asked and have a clear understanding of the properties
of the final answer. 3.3.3.2 Devise a Plan
Different problems can be solved using a variety of solutions. Some
of these procedures include making a list of the known information,
making a list of information that is needed, sketching a diagram, making
an organized list that shows all possibilities, making a table or a chart,
working backwards, trying to solve a similar but simpler problem,
looking for a pattern, writing an equation, performing an experiment,
guessing at a solution and then check our result.
3.3.3.3 Carry Out the Plan
Once we devised a plan, we must carry it out. Careful execution of
the plan is important and a record of the process and results obtained
shall be in place. If the first plan is not successful, we can always use
another plan and start all over.
3.3.3.4 Review the Solution
Once we have found a solution, we check the solution and make
sure that the solution is consistent with the facts of the problem. We
must interpret the solution in the context of the problem and figure out
whether there are generalizations of the solution that could apply to
other problems.
Review the Are we sure that As an alternative solution, we see that the above table
Solution our answer is illustrates additional patterns. For
correct? instance, if each of the location
numbers in column is divided by , a remainder is
produced. If each of the location numbers
in column is divided by , a remainder of is produced. Thus,
we can find the decimal digit in any location by
dividing the location number by and examining the
th
remainder. Thus, to find the digit in the decimal place
of , we merely divide by and
examine the remainder, which is .
Thus, the
digit places to the right of the decimal point is a .
Example 11. Apply Polya’s strategy to solve the following problem.
A paper fan and a visor together cost ₱100.00. The visor costs ₱
90.00 more than the paper fan. What are the individual costs of the
visor and the fan?
Solution.
Understand What are the given The price of a paper fan and a visor together is ₱100.00.
the Problem information? The visor costs ₱90.00 more than the paper fan.
What is/are the Visor’s price must be higher than the price of the paper
property/ies of the fan.
final answer? Both prices must be less than ₱100.00.
Unit of cost is in ₱.
Devise a What steps are 1. Represent the cost of visor and paper fan using a variable.
Plan needed to solve the 2. Translate the statement to mathematical equation.
problem? 3. Solve for the cost of the visor and the paper fan.
Carry Out What are the 1. We let ℎ be the cost of the paper fan. Since the visor costs
the Plan results after we ₱90.00 more than the visor, we represent its cost by ℎ +
take the steps in 90.
solving the 2. The cost of paper fan and visor altogether is ₱100.00. This
problem? can be expressed ℎ + ℎ + 90 = 100.
3. Solving this equation, we have
ℎ + ℎ + 90 = 100
2ℎ + 90 = 100
2ℎ = 100 − 90
2ℎ = 10
ℎ=5
The cost of the paper fan is ₱5.00 and the cost of the visor
is
₱ 5.00 + ₱ 90.00 = ₱ 95.00.
Review the Are we sure that • Checking the sum of the costs we get ₱ 5.00 + ₱ 95.00 = ₱
Solution our answer is 100.00
correct? • The difference of the costs of the visor and the paper fan
is ₱95.00 − ₱5.00 = ₱90.00.
Learning Activity 6
Understand the
problem
Devise a plan
Review the
solution
Understand the
problem
Devise a plan
Review the
solution
3.4 Recommended learning materials and resources
Remote (asynchronous)
3. The number of ducks and pigs in a field total 35. The total
number of legs among them is 98. Assuming each duck has
exactly two legs and each pig has exactly four legs, determ-
ine how many ducks and how many pigs are in the field?
Books:
Aufmann, et. al. 2013. Mathematical Excursions. Third Edition. Cengage
Learning, USA
Hammack, Richard. 2013 Book of Proof. Department of Mathematics and
Applied Mathematics. Virginia Commonwealth University
Stewart, I. 2008. Professor Stewarts’s Cabinet of Mathematical Curiosities.
Basic Books. USA
Sets
A = { 1,2,3,4,5,6…}
C is the set even whole numbers greater than 2 but less than 10
C = { 4,6,8}
Types of Set
1. Finite Set – is a set whose elements can be counted.
Examples
{2,4,6,8}
English Alphabet
Example
The set of counting numbers between 8 and 9.
The set of whole numbers less than 0
1. Roster method. Some sets have few elements which makes it possible
to provide a list of its members. One way of denoting a set is by the
roster method where we list its elements inside curly brackets: {2, 3, 5,
7, 11, 13, 17, 19}, for example, is the set whose elements are the eight
numbers 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, and 19.
Examples
2. Use of dots. Most sets are too large and they are often infinite. A
second way to denote sets is to use three dots to imply a list that is
too long to write down: for example, the expressions {1, 2, 3, … , 100} and
{2, 4, 6, 8, … } represent the set of all positive integers up to 100 and the
set of all positive even numbers, respectively. The three dots are col-
lectively called ellipsis.
2 = 2.1
3 = 3.1
5 = 5.1
7 = 7.1
11=11.1
Composite
4= 4.1
2.2
6 = 6.1
3.2
8= 8.1
4.2
9= 9.1
3.3
A = { 2,4,6,8,10,12}
Sets allow one to reduce the number of parts of speech that one needs,
turning almost all of them into nouns. For example, with the help of the
membership symbol ϵ one can do without adjectives. The translation of 5 is
a prime number (where “prime” functions as an adjective) will simply be 5 ϵ 𝑃.
A = { 1,2,4,5,7,8}
B = { 2,4,6,8,10,12,14}
AUB = { 1,2,4,5,6,7,8,10,12,14}
A = { 1,2,4,5,7,8}
B = { 2,4,6,8,10,12,14}
A ∩ B = { 2,4,8}
The complement of a set A, denote by A’ or Ac , is the set of all elements
that belong to the universal set but do not belong to A.
U = { 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10}
A = { 1,4,6,8,10}
Ac = { 2,3,5,7,9}
U = ( a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i,j,k,l}
A = ( b,e,g,i}
Ac = { a,c,d,f,h,j,k,l}
Two sets A and B are equal , denoted by A=B, if they have exactly the same
elements.
A = { 2,4,6,8)
B = { 3,6,9,12}
Two sets A and B are equal are equivalent , denoted by A ↔B , if there exists
a one-to-one correspondence between their elements.
A = { 1,3,6,7}
B = { 3,1,7,6}
An ordered pair is a list (𝑥, 𝑦) of two things 𝑥 and 𝑦, enclosed in parentheses and
separated by a comma.
We take note that (2,4) is an ordered pair different from another ordered
pair (4,2). We write (2,4) ≠ (4,2). Right away you can see that ordered pairs
can be used to describe points on the plane, as was done in calculus, but
they are not limited to just that. Letters, for example, may be expressed as
ordered pairs like (𝑚, 𝑙). Now we are ready to define the Cartesian product.
Cartesian Product
A = { 1,3,5,6}
B = { 2,4,6,8}
B x A = { (2,1), (2,3),…………………………….
The Cartesian product of two sets 𝐴 and 𝐵 is another set, denoted as 𝐴 × 𝐵 and defined
as 𝐴 × 𝐵 = {(𝑎,𝑏) ∶ 𝑎 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑏 ∈ 𝐵} .
𝐴 × 𝐵 = {(𝑘, 1), (𝑘, 2), (𝑙, 1), (𝑙, 2), (𝑚, 1), (𝑚, 2)}
Learning Activity 6
Example
{2,4,6,8,10} {2𝑛 ∶ 𝑛 ϵ
Start Here:
Suppose 𝐴 and 𝐵 are sets. If every element of 𝐴 is also an element of 𝐵, then we say 𝐴
is a subset of 𝐵, and we denote this as 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵.
We write 𝐴 ⊈ 𝐵 if 𝐴 is not a subset of 𝐵, that is, if it is not true that every element of 𝐴
is also an element of 𝐵. Thus 𝐴 ⊈ 𝐵 means that there is at least one element of 𝐴 that
is not an element of 𝐵.
In words, the union 𝐴 ∪ 𝐵 is the set of all things that are in 𝐴 or in 𝐵 (or in both).
The intersection 𝐴 ∩ 𝐵 is the set of all things in both 𝐴 and 𝐵. The difference 𝐴 − 𝐵
is the set of all things that are in 𝐴 but not in 𝐵.
A relation is a set of ordered pairs . The set of all the first
elements on the ordered pairs is called the domain of the
relation., while the set of all the second elements of the ordered
pairs is called the range of the relation.
Domain-
Range -
Try this
A. Determine whether each of the following represents a
relation or not. If it represents a relation, determine
whether the relation is a function or not.
1. { (5,5), (-5,6), (6,-6) , (6,6)}
2. { (3,4), (4,5), (5,1), (6,1)}
3. {( 1,1), ( 1,2), (2,2), (3,1)}
4. { ( 2,-2), (3,-2), (4,-2),(5,-2)}
5. { (x,y)/ y + 2x =5
2.
X 0 1 2 3 4 5
Y 0 -1 -2 -3 -4 -5
Domain:______________ Range:_______________
Equation:_____________________________
3.
X 0 1 2 3 4 5
Y 0 2 4 6 8 10
Domain:______________ Range:_______________
Equation:_____________________________
4.
X 0 1 2 3 4 5
Y 2 1 4 9 16 25
Domain:______________ Range:_______________
Equation:_____________________________
MODULE 3
The Nature of Mathematics: Problem Solving and Reasoning
3.1 Introduction
Central to the study of mathematics is its ability to solve problems even
outside the field. Different professions deal with different problems. Most
professionals are required to have good problem solving skills. In the
previous module, you built a clear understanding of mathematics as a
language and improved your skills in translating mathematical sentences to
symbols. This skill is so important for you to become a better problem
solver.
In this module, our main focus is on how you solve a problem in a
systematic manner.
3.2 Learning Outcomes
After finishing this module, you are expected to
If you pick the number 5, the procedure will give a result of 10. For 6, it
will give 12; for 7, 14; for 10, 20; and for 100, 200. We observe that the
resulting numbers are twice the original number. Thus, we conjecture that
the process will produce a number which is twice the original.
We used inductive reasoning in making a conjecture in the previous
example. We must take note that though it can be helpful to use inductive
reasoning to arrive at a conclusion, extra care must be observed when
performing procedure. Conclusions based on inductive reasoning may not
be correct. The following example illustrates this instance.
Example 3. Consider the polynomial 𝑛2 + 19𝑛 − 19 where 𝑛 is a counting
number.
𝑛 𝑛2 + 19𝑛 − 19
2 23
3 47
4 73
5 101
6 131
7 163
𝑛 𝑛2 + 19𝑛 − 19
8 23
9 47
10 73
11 101
12 131
We see that the results are consistent and that our conjecture
seems correct. If we continue checking on the next results, we get 397,
443, 491, 541, 593, and 647. All these numbers are prime. However, if
𝑛 = 19, we get 703 which is the product of 19 and 37. This makes us
conclude that our conjecture is incorrect.
Example 4.
Find the next three terms of the sequences 17,25,33…
Not all conjecture are true. When we find example showing that
conjecture is false, this example is called a counterexample.
Try this.
Sum
Addends
-5 3 -2
-3 2 -1
-8 4 -4
-10 6 -4
9.
Learning Activity 1
3 5 7 9 11 13
, , , ,
5 7 9 11 13 15
,
Start Here: