LDRS 500 D Syllabus SP 2024
LDRS 500 D Syllabus SP 2024
Course Description
This introductory course provides an understanding of the philosophical and theoretical basis for
leadership, including the participant's stage of development. Major historical models for leadership are
examined with special attention to servant leadership, and participants examine ways of improving their own
leadership skills through practical interactive group exercises.
Learning Outcomes
TWU Graduate Student Learning Outcomes Course Learning Outcomes
Knowledge and its Application
• Demonstrate in‐depth knowledge of a
particular field of study and/or The learner will apply Servant-Leadership
profession principles in their life personally, as well as
• Demonstrate ability to apply within organizational life.
knowledge and discipline
specific methodology to solve The learner will comprehend the important role
unique problems that Servant-leaders play in directing,
• Demonstrate superior ability to identify sustaining, and shaping organizations.
and interpret new ideas and research in
a specific discipline The learner will be able to utilize and evaluate
• Demonstrate superior skills in the importance of good communications and
academic research, writing, decision-making through practicing listening
and communication act as and problem-solving skills.
Course Activities/Requirements
In our time together, we focus our material through a Transformational Servant Leadership lens.
Selecting material most consistent with our approach to Leadership, studying a few ideas in detail, but
falling short of touching on every relevant topic related to Leadership; complete investigation, but not
comprehensive.
The opportunity to interact face to face allows us to take maximum advantage of our time
together. Our focus is on practical leadership development and interacting with one another is a
clear asset in our focus of important concepts.
As Facilitator, I will focus on ensuring we navigate the best available information and inspiration, to
create an adaptive journey for everyone. This requires applying the Transformative Servant paradigm
to what we do and learn, as we walk through course exercises to lead us to a clear understanding of
how to integrate and apply material learned to your own results-focused leadership. To get a sense
of what this means, we rely on one another for mutual learning.
• Mutual learning. The great privilege of mutuality is learning from others in the class we share. An
important part of our class involves communicating information sources/articles/videos etc.
everyone benefits from. Because this is important, we need everyone to contribute Resources
Graduate Course Syllabus Template
Approved by University Senate April; 30, 2019
whenever you feel everyone can/will benefit.
PRE-ASSIGNMENT: Learner check-in and expectations. Please ensure you check into the course online
forum with information regarding:
Please note that this is very important for our time together: I will be using this information to determine
the depth to which we go into each element of the course. Each stream has now developed some
differential learning levels: it is important that our course content be as balanced as possible
1. Face to face Sessions
2. Group Team Meetings: Encouraged
Course Evaluation
The course grade will be determined by the satisfactory completion of all requirements.
Critical Thinking
Critical thinking is an essential component of leadership because there is an intelligence to practice. This
practical wisdom or phronesis is an intellectual virtue incorporating discernment and judgment and is
enhanced through practice. How does a leader in your context incorporate critical thinking? To prime
your thinking, view the following videos (total of just under 25 minutes). Then explore the website
www.criticalthinking.org These should give you enough information. You may also research other
sources.
Videos and Resources:
*What is Critical Thinking (https://youtu.be/9oAf3g5_138)
*Example of Lateral Thinking when it matters
(https://youtu.be/q3HjWA7bii4?list=PL3fSda8lJVjQ4Sdumgrz1Ghfdx_DgovoS)
*Edward de Bono discusses Lateral Thinking (https://youtu.be/Nb9Oe83ruUw?)
*Beyond Common Sense: Critical Thinking Skills and Decision Making for Leaders
(https://youtu.be/QTWc-JLh3Fw)
*The Importance of Critical Thinking (https://youtu.be/2yEZHXgQKsM)
*http://www.criticalthinking.org (http://www.criticalthinking.org/pages/college-and-university-
students/799)
Grading System
To ensure consistency in the MAL assignment of grades and to inform graduate students of assessments
of the quality of work at the graduate level, the following interpretation of grades in assignments and
courses offers a guideline
Grade
Letter Meaning in Graduate Work Note: For assignments that meet criteria in
% Point
Grade several categories, instructors will assign an average grade.
Value
Exceptionally well-reasoned, compelling development of position.
Outstanding incorporation of personal vision as well as of references and
resources. Strikingly appropriate examples. Extraordinary insight, critical
A+ 95-100 4.3 analytical and evaluative ability, and creativity. Superlative style and
language usage. Makes an original contribution and is potentially
publishable.
Well-argued and convincing development of position. Insightful
incorporation of personal vision as well as of references and resources.
A 90-94 4.0 Notably appropriate examples. Excellent insight, critical analytic and
evaluative ability, and creativity. Impressive style and language use.
Thorough and plausible development of position. Skillful incorporation of
personal vision as well as of references and resources. Very good
A- 85-89 3.7 examples. Very good insight, analytic and evaluative ability, and creativity.
Commendable and fluent style and language usage.
Proficient development of position. Appropriate incorporation of personal
vision as well as of references and resources. Relevant examples. Good
B+ 80-84 3.3 quality insight, analytic and evaluative ability, and creativity. Clear and
correct style and language usage.
Competent development of position, but possibly with some gaps and/or
limitations. Satisfactory incorporation of personal vision as well as of
B 75-79 3.0 references and resources. Satisfactory examples. Reasonable insight,
analytic and evaluative ability. Little creativity. Generally satisfactory style
and language usage, but possibly with some minor flaws.
Unimpressive development of position. Position not completely consistent
with personal vision or references and resources not taken fully into
account or examples are basic or not completely convincing or lacking
B- 70-74 2.7* acceptable insight and analytic and evaluative ability. Style and language
usage with weaknesses (e.g., clarity, coherence, grammar). Overall quality
shows noticeable deficiencies.
Unacceptable work at graduate level. Shows lack of understanding and/or
competence in several of the criteria described above. This grade is a
F <70 2.0 failing grade at the graduate level, and students receiving an “F” course
grade are required to re-take the course.
*Note: Learners require a composite GPA of 3.0 to graduate.
Other Designated Grades
INC = Incomplete. A grade may be incomplete if assignments remain outstanding in a course or if the
instructor has not yet submitted a grade. If assignments remain outstanding at the end of a course,
students must obtain and complete an incomplete grade form from Enrolment Services.
W = Withdrew. This grade is assigned for students withdrawing during the first half of the course.
Course Outline
Date Topic Due
Introductions, course logistics
Unit-1 Unit 1 Team Dialogue
Defining Leadership and the Essentials of
Transformation
Defining Leadership/Servant Leadership Assignment: Servant Leadership Case Study
Unit-2
Excellence Unit 2 Team Dialogue
Unit-3 Self Leadership I Unit 3 Team Dialogue
Assignment – My Leadership Story
Unit-4 Self Leadership II
Unit 4 Team Dialogue
Unit-5 Relational Leadership Unit 5 Team Dialogue
Submit: Servant Leadership Case Study
Unit-6 Case Study and My Leadership Stroy
Submit: My Leadership Story
Course Policies
Academic Integrity and Avoiding Plagiarism at TWU
One of the core values of Trinity Western University is the integration of academic excellence with
high standards of personal, moral, and spiritual integrity. The University considers it a serious offence
when an individual attempts to gain unearned academic credit. It is thestudent’s responsibility to be
informed about what constitutes academic dishonesty. For details on this, and on identifying and
avoiding plagiarism go to the University Homepage > Academics > Academic Calendar > Academic
Information > Academic Policies > Academic Dishonesty and Plagiarism.
https://prezi.com/od62fxnkbmxh/plagiarism‐how‐to‐get‐it‐out‐of‐your‐life/ (Prezi presentation)
http://bit.ly/1p00KX3 (Google Slide presentation offering more comprehensiveinformation)