0% found this document useful (0 votes)
7 views

Aleah Module 4.2

The document describes the Six Step Problem Solving Model and how it could be applied to determine if changes are needed to the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines. The six steps are: 1) define the problem, 2) generate alternative solutions, 3) evaluate the alternatives, 4) select the best solution, 5) implement the solution, and 6) evaluate the outcome.

Uploaded by

aestoque
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
7 views

Aleah Module 4.2

The document describes the Six Step Problem Solving Model and how it could be applied to determine if changes are needed to the 1987 Constitution of the Philippines. The six steps are: 1) define the problem, 2) generate alternative solutions, 3) evaluate the alternatives, 4) select the best solution, 5) implement the solution, and 6) evaluate the outcome.

Uploaded by

aestoque
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

ESTOQUE,

ALEAHMAEB. BPED-
1A

MODULE4.
2:Si
xSt
epPr
obl
em Sol
vi
ngModel

The pr ocess of the Six Step Pr


obl
em Sol
vi
ng Model can be used to dev
elop
recommendat i
ons/
solut
ionsi
fther
eisaneedt
ochanget
he1987Consti
tut
ion.Her
earethe
steps:

Step1:Defi
netheprobl
em:Theprobl
em iswhetherornott
he1987Const
it
uti
onneedst
obe
changed,
andifso,
whatspeci
fi
cchangesareneeded.

Step2.Generatealternati
vesolut
ions:Alternat
ivesolut
ionsmi ghti
ncludeacompr ehensiv
e
revi
sionoftheConstit
utionorspecif
icamendment stoaddr essparti
cul
arissuesorconcer ns.
Otheralter
nati
ves couldi ncl
ude maint
aining the Consti
tution as i
s orpr oposi
ng a new
Constit
uti
onalt
oget
her.

Step3.Evaluat
et heal ter
nati
ves:Thev ariousal
ter
nati
veswouldneedtobeevaluatedinterms
oftheirfeasi
bil
i
t y,effecti
veness,legali
ty,andpotent
iali
mpactonsoci et
y,poli
tics,andthe
economy.Thisev aluati
onshoul dinvol
v eabroadrangeofstakehol
der
s,i
ncl
udi
ngl egalexper
ts,
poli
ti
call
eaders,civil
societyorganizat
ions,andt
hegeneralpubli
c.

St
ep4.Selectt
hebestsoluti
on:Basedont heeval
uati
on,adeci
sionshoul
dbemadeont
he
mostv
iabl
eandeff
ect
ivesolut
ionfort
heissueathand.

St
ep5.Implementthesolut
ion:
Onceadecisi
onhasbeenmade, t
heselect
edsoluti
onshouldbe
i
mplemented thr
ough legaland poli
ti
calprocesses,such as consti
tut
ionalconvent
ions,
l
egi
slat
iveact
ion,
orapubl i
cref
erendum.

Step6.Ev al
uat
etheoutcome:Aft
ertheimpl
ement at
ionoft hesol
uti
on,i
tisnecessar
yto
evaluat
eit
soutcomes,i
ncl
udi
ngit
simpactonsociet
y,poli
ti
cs,andt
heeconomy.I
fnecessar
y,
furt
heradj
ustment
scanbemadetoimprov
eit
seffecti
veness.

Inconclusion,t
heSixStepPr oblem Sol
vi
ngModelcanbeusedt oapproachtheissueof
changi
ngt he1987Consti
tut
ionbysystemati
call
yanaly
zingt
heprobl
em,eval
uat i
ngal
ter
nati
ves,
andsel
ect i
ngthebestsol
uti
onthroughaparti
cipat
oryanddemocrat
icpr
ocess.

You might also like