Local Rules LACS
Local Rules LACS
GENERAL PROVISIONS
2.1 PRINCIPAL DIVISIONS OF THE COURT
Subject to the authority of the Presiding Judge to apportion the work of the court, the
following are the principal divisions of the court:
(a) Civil Division. All departments within the court designated by the Presiding Judge to
hear civil cases constitute the Civil Division of the Los Angeles Superior Court. Included within
the Civil Division are all small claims courts.
(b) Probate and Mental Health Division. All departments within the court designated by
the Presiding Judge to hear probate cases constitute the Probate Division of the Los Angeles
Superior Court. The mental health departments are included within the Probate Division.
(c) Family Law Division. All departments within the court designated by the Presiding
Judge to hear family law cases constitute the Family Law Division of the Los Angeles Superior
Court.
(d) Juvenile Division. All departments within the court designated by the Presiding Judge
to hear juvenile court cases constitute the Juvenile Division of the Los Angeles Superior Court.
(e) Criminal Division. All departments within the court designated by the Presiding Judge
to hear criminal cases constitute the Criminal Division of the Los Angeles Superior Court.
Included within the Criminal Division are all traffic courts.
(f) Appellate Division. The department designated by the Presiding Judge to hear appeals
and writ petitions in limited civil and criminal cases constitutes the Appellate Division of the Los
Angeles Superior Court.
(g) Authority of Supervising Judges. The Supervising Judge of each of the principal
divisions of the court is the head of that division. Subject to the approval of the Executive
Committee and the Presiding Judge, the Supervising Judge of each division has the authority to
establish uniform policy and procedures applicable to all courts in that division.
(h) Courts of Divisional and District Supervising Judges. Subject to the authority of the
Presiding Judge to assign judges to specific departments, the Supervising Judges of the principal
divisions of the court are assigned as follows:
(1) Civil Division Department 1, Central District
(2) Probate and Mental Health Division Department 79, Central District
(3) Family Law Division Department 2, Central District
(4) Juvenile Division Department 400, Central District
(5) Criminal Division Department 100, Central District
As provided for in Local Rule 1.7(m), the divisional Supervising Judges are members ex
officio of the court’s Executive Committee. Unless the Presiding Judge otherwise orders, district
Supervising Judges select the department within that district in which they will preside.
Unless the Presiding Judge or the district SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES Table of Contents Local Rules – Effective July 1, 2023 Page 2-2
Supervising Judge otherwise order, site judges select the department in the courthouse in which
they will preside.
2.15 HOLIDAYS
If any day on which an act required to be done by these rules or by court order falls on a
legal holiday, the act may be performed on the next succeeding court day.
CHAPTER THREE
CIVIL DIVISION RULES
3.1 APPLICABILITY
This chapter applies to all civil limited and unlimited cases within the Civil Division of
the court. As used in this chapter, the term “counsel” includes self-represented litigants.
3.2 ASSIGNMENT OF CASES
The Supervising Judge, or his or her designee, shall decide whether the civil limited and
unlimited cases in a particular district will be assigned to a direct calendar, master calendar, or
Specialized Civil Court.
3.3 ASSIGNMENT OF DIRECT CALENDAR CASES
(a) Proportionate Assignment. A pro rata share of all cases filed in or transferred to any
district shall be assigned for all purposes to each judge assigned to hear direct calendar cases in
that district.
(b) Regulation of Case Assignment. The clerk must take all reasonably appropriate steps,
including a system of random use of case numbers, to ensure that neither any party nor any
counsel will be able to anticipate a case assignment. The name of the judge to whom the case is
assigned will be designated by the clerk on the summons and the complaint.
(c) Notice of Case Assignment. At the time that a civil case is filed, the clerk must
provide a Notice of Case Assignment, which must indicate the name of the judge to whom the
case has been assigned. Each plaintiff (and cross-complainant) must serve a copy of the notice,
with the complaint (and cross-complaint), and give notice of any date set for a case management
or status conference.
(d) Improper Refiling. A party must not dismiss and then refile a case for the purpose of
obtaining a different judge. Whenever a case is dismissed by a party or by the court prior to
judgment and a new action is later filed containing the same or essentially the same claims and
the same or essentially the same parties, the new action will be assigned, unless the Supervising
Judge for good cause orders otherwise, to the judge to whom the first case had been assigned.
When multiple cases involving the same or essentially the same claims, and the same or
essentially the same parties, are filed on the same date, the cases shall be assigned to the judge to
whom the low numbered case (or first filed case) has been assigned, whether or not that case has
been dismissed.
(e) Duty of Counsel. Every counsel in the second action referred to in subdivision (d)
above must immediately bring the fact of the dismissal and refiling to the attention of the court.
Counsel for plaintiff or cross-complainant (if the earlier action is renewed in a cross-complaint)
must do so at the time that pleading is filed. Counsel for all other parties must do so upon their
first appearance, or as soon thereafter as they discover the facts. The notice must be given in a
“Notice of Related Case” as provided in California Rules of Court, rule 3.300. SUPERIOR
COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES Page 44 of 214 Local Rules –
Effective January 1, 2022
(f) Related Cases. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.300.) (1) Where one of the cases listed in a
Notice of Related Cases has been assigned to a Complex Litigation department, the judge in the
Complex Litigation department shall determine whether the cases will be ordered related and
assigned to the Complex Litigation department; (2) Where the cases listed in a Notice of Related
Cases contains a probate or family law case, Department 1 shall determine whether the cases
shall be ordered related and, if so, to which department they shall be assigned if the cases are all
pending in the Central District or pending in two different districts. If the cases are all pending in
one district that is other than the Central District, the Supervising Judge of that district shall
determine whether the cases shall be ordered related and, if so, to which department they shall be
assigned. In addition to filing the Notice of Related Cases in the departments of all pending
cases, a copy of the Notice of Related Cases must be filed in Department 1 for matters to be
determined in Department 1, and in the courtroom of the Supervising Judge of a district if the
matter is to be determined by the Supervising Judge of that district; (3) In the event that the judge
designated under California Rules of Court, rule 3.300(h)(1)(A)(B)(C) to make the decision,
does not order related any of the cases set forth in the Notice of Related Cases, any party may
file a motion to have the cases related. Department 1 shall hear the motion, if the cases are all
pending in the Central District or are pending in two or more different districts. If the cases are
all pending in one district that is other than the Central District, the motion shall be heard by the
Supervising Judge of that district. The motion must be served on each party in every case listed
in the Notice of Related Cases, with proof of service attached; and (4) Complex cases. Under
California Rules of Court, rule 3.300(h)(3), the provisions in (3) of this subdivision do not apply
in cases that have been designated as complex by the parties or determined to be complex by the
court.
(g) Consolidation of Cases.
(1) Cases may not be consolidated unless they are in the same department. A
motion to consolidate two or more cases may be noticed and heard after the cases,
initially filed in different departments, have been related into a single department, or if
the cases were already assigned to that department.
(2) Upon consolidation of cases, the first filed case will be the lead case, unless
otherwise ordered by the court. After consolidation, all future papers to be filed in the
consolidated case must be filed only in the case designated as the lead case.
(3) Before consolidation of a limited case with an unlimited case, the limited case
must be reclassified as an unlimited case and the reclassification fee paid.
(h) Coordination of Non-Complex Cases. A civil case which is not complex as defined by
Standard 3.10 of the Standards of Judicial Administration may be transferred to the court from a
superior court in another county, if it involves a common question of fact or law within the
meaning of Code of Civil Procedure section 403. The coordination motion shall be made in
compliance with the procedures established by California Rules of Court, rule 3.500.
Coordination motions seeking to transfer a case or cases to the Central District shall be filed and
heard in Department 1. Coordination motions seeking to transfer a case or cases to a district
other than the Central District shall be heard by the Supervising Judge in that district.
(i) Assignment for All Purposes. Cases are assigned for all purposes, including trial.
Except as the Presiding Judge may otherwise direct, each judge shall schedule, hear and decide
all matters for each case assigned. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS
ANGELES Page 45 of 214 Local Rules – Effective January 1, 2022
(j) Effect of Judge Unavailability. Whenever a judge is unavailable to perform his or her
duties, the cases previously assigned to that judge shall be reassigned to another judge as the
Supervising Judge determines.
(k) Complex Litigation.
(1) The Complex Litigation Program of the Los Angeles Superior Court will
consist of the departments designated by order of the Presiding Judge. Complex cases
must be filed in the districts designated according to Local Rule 2.3. Complex cases must
be designated or counterdesignated in the civil cover sheet as provided by California
Rules of Court, rules 3.401-3.402.
(2) Except as provided in subsection (8) below concerning class actions, the
Assistant Supervising Judge, Civil/Complex, (or his or her designee) (collectively,
“Assistant Supervising Judge Civil/Complex”) will review all cases in which a
plaintiff/petitioner or a defendant/respondent has designated or counter-designated the
case as complex and all cases that are designated on the civil cover sheet as
“provisionally” complex (see California Rules of Court, rule 3.400(c)). This review will
be conducted as soon as feasible after the case is filed, but before the case is assigned to a
judge. The Assistant Supervising Judge, Civil/Complex will determine (with or without a
hearing) whether to designate the case as complex pursuant to California Rules of Court,
rule 3.403. If the matter is designated as complex and if any party has not yet paid the
complex case fee required by Government Code section 70616(a), the court shall order
payment of that fee. If the case is designated complex, the Assistant Supervising Judge,
Civil/Complex will assign the case to a judge in the Complex Litigation Program. If the
case is not designated complex, the Supervising Judge, Civil will assign the case.
(3) The judge who manages the complex case should do so with due consideration
of Standard 3.10 of the Judicial Administration Standards and the case management
concepts set forth in the Deskbook on Complex Civil Litigation published by the Judicial
Council of California.
(4) If a party wishes to seek a designation that a case is a complex case, the party
may seek to transfer the case to the Complex Litigation Program in the following manner.
The party must complete the Complex Civil Case Questionnaire designated by the
Assistant Supervising Judge, Civil/Complex. The Questionnaire must be filed in the court
in which the case is pending. A courtesy copy of the Questionnaire must be provided to
the Assistant Supervising Judge, Civil/Complex, who shall determine, with or without a
hearing, but with notice to the assigned judge, whether the case should be assigned to the
Complex Litigation Program in light of the caseload of the Program, the relative
complexity of the case compared with cases then assigned to the Program, and the length
of time the case has been pending.
(5) Nothing in this rule will be construed to alter the continuing power of a judge
assigned to a case to decide at a later date that the case is complex or that a case
previously declared to be complex is not. (See Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.403(b).)
(6) If the judge to whom a case is assigned determines that a case is a complex
case, the judge may seek to transfer the case to the Complex Litigation Program in the
following manner. The judge or the party, on order of the court, shall complete the
Complex Civil Case Questionnaire designated by the Assistant Supervising Judge,
Civil/Complex. The Questionnaire must be filed in the court in which the case is pending.
A courtesy copy of the Questionnaire must be provided to the Assistant Supervising
Judge, Civil/Complex, who shall determine, with or without a hearing, but with notice to
the assigned judge, whether the case should be assigned to the Complex Litigation
Program in light of the caseload of the Program, the relative complexity of the case
compared with cases then assigned to the Program, and the length of time the case has
been pending. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
Page 46 of 214 Local Rules – Effective January 1, 2022
(7) A decision by the assigned judge to deem the case complex does not cause the
case to transfer into the Complex Litigation Program. Only the Assistant Supervising
Judge, Civil/Complex decides if a case will transfer into the Complex Litigation Program.
(8) Recognizing that class actions are defined as provisionally complex pursuant
to California Rules of Court, rule 3.400(c), considering the factors which make a case
complex enumerated in California Rules of Court, rule 3.400(b), and consistent with the
policy to determine as soon as reasonably practicable whether a case is complex under
California Rules of Court, rule 3.403, all class actions are presumed to be complex and at
filing are assigned to the Complex Litigation Program of the court. Pursuant to
Government Code Section 70616(a), the complex case fee and first appearance fee must
be paid at the time of the filing of the first paper in a class action proceeding. If class
action claims are added to the case after the original filing of the complaint, and a party
wants the case transferred to the Complex Litigation Program, the party must follow the
procedure provided in subsection (4).
GENERAL PROVISION
3.4 ELECTRONIC FILING
(a) Mandatory Electronic Filing. Pursuant to the operative General Order re Mandatory
Electronic Filing for Civil (“General Order”), represented parties in civil actions must file
documents electronically, unless the court exempts parties from doing so. The electronic filing of
documents must be effected using an approved electronic service provider. Electronic service
provider information is available on the court’s website at www.lacourt.org.
(b) Exemptions from Mandatory Electronic Filing. Self-represented litigants are exempt
from mandatory electronic filing requirements. Although not required, self-represented litigants
are encouraged to participate in electronic filing and service. In addition, represented parties may
apply for exemption from electronic filing requirements as set forth in the operative General
Order.
(c) Timing for Electronic Filing. Any document received electronically before midnight
on a court day is deemed to have been filed on that court day if accepted for filing. Any
document received on a non-court day is deemed to have been filed on the next court day if
accepted for filing. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 2.253(b)(6); Code Civ. Proc., § 1010.6(b)(3).) This
Rule does not affect the timing requirements for any documents that must be filed by a
designated time on the due date.
(d) Timing for Exempted Filing. All filings exempt from mandatory filing requirements
under subdivision (b) must be filed at the clerk’s filing window no later than 4:30 p.m. The
clerk’s office will open to the public at 8:30 a.m. for filing documents and other official public
services, and close at 4:30 p.m. each court day. Except as directed by the court, the clerk may not
allow the public to enter the offices for the purpose of filing papers or obtaining other official
services after 4:30 p.m. Persons in the clerk’s office at 4:30 p.m. may complete their filing.
(e) Lodged Materials. All separate exhibits (i.e., deposition transcripts, bulky items, etc.)
not attached to filed papers and presented for motions and trials must be lodged with the court in
time for the hearing, or at such other time as the court orders. All lodged exhibits will be returned
to counsel for preservation after the hearing unless ordered by the court. A party must either
submit a selfaddressed stamped envelope with lodged material, or submit an attorney-service
pick-up slip where the attorney service has been instructed by counsel to pick up the lodged
material without reminder from the clerk.
(f) Time for Filing of Ex Parte Applications. Ex parte applications subject to mandatory
electronic filing must be filed pursuant to the timing set forth in all operative General Orders. In
the Central District, if a party is exempt from electronic filing, ex parte application papers for all
limited civil matters, including unlawful detainer matters, must be filed at the first floor filing
window at the Stanley Mosk Courthouse, and fees paid, by 11:00 a.m.
3.5 TIME FOR HEARINGS
Time of Hearing. In the Central District, except as stated below, unlimited civil law and
motion matters, including ex parte applications, will be heard by the Direct Calendar, Specialized
Civil Court, and Master Calendar Court judges in their respective departments at 8:30 a.m. each
day.
(a) Writs and Receivers Departments. Noticed motions and other noticed proceedings are
heard in Departments 82, 85, and 86 (“writs and receivers departments”) on the following
calendar days and times: (a) Department 82 (Tuesday 8:30 a.m. and Thursday 1:30 p.m.), (b)
Department 85 (Tuesday 1:30 p.m. and Thursday 8:30 a.m.) and (c) Department 86 (Wednesday
8:30 am. and Friday 1:30 p.m.) Ex parte applications are heard daily in the writs and receivers
departments at 8:30 a.m.
(b) Limited Unlawful Detainers and Limited Civil. Ex parte applications are heard at 1:30
p.m.
(c) Supplemental and Miscellaneous Proceedings in the Central District. To determine the
days, times, and places for supplemental and miscellaneous proceedings in the Central District,
counsel should check the court’s website at www.lacourt.org.
(d) Districts Other Than Central District. To determine the days, times, and places for
matters heard in districts other than the Central District, counsel should consult with the office of
the supervising judge of the district.
3.7 EVIDENCE AT HEARING
Oral testimony is not allowed without court permission. A party seeking permission to
introduce oral evidence must file the statement required by California Rules of Court, rule
3.1306, and must include in the statement the reason why the evidence cannot be presented by
declaration.
3.10 SANCTIONS
The court may impose appropriate sanctions for the failure or refusal to comply with the
rules in this chapter, including the time standards and/or deadlines, and any court order made
pursuant to the rules. Counsel are directed to Code of Civil Procedure sections 128, 128.7, 177.5,
575.2, 583.150, 583.430, 2016.010-2036.050, Government Code section 68608, and California
Rules of Court, rule 2.30. The sanctions may be imposed on a party and, if appropriate, on
counsel for that party.
3.11 CONTEMPT
A direct contempt committed in the immediate view and presence of the judge in court or
in chambers will be handled by the judge before whom the contempt occurs. Indirect contempts
may be heard in the department to which the case is assigned or, if the department cannot hear
the contempt SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES Page 49 of
214 Local Rules – Effective January 1, 2022 and transfer is required by law, that court may
transfer the contempt proceeding to (1) the appropriate writs and receivers department, if it is a
Central District case, or (2) the supervising judge of the district, if it is a case filed in another
district.
(a) Order to Show Cause. Although Code of Civil Procedure section 1212 permits a
warrant of attachment against the person charged with contempt, the standard procedure is
section 1212's alternative method of issuance of an order to show cause (“OSC”) re: contempt.
An OSC will issue if the affidavit is sufficient, and the OSC must then be personally served on
the accused person. The OSC may issue upon ex parte application, but only if the requesting
party has complied with the notification requirements of California Rules of Court, rule 3.1204.
If the accused person is served with the OSC and fails to appear, the court may issue a body
attachment.
(b) Trial. The hearing on the OSC re: contempt is in the nature of a quasi-criminal trial.
The accused person has the right to appointed counsel, to remain silent, to confront and cross-
examine witnesses, and to be proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. The only major
difference between contempt and a criminal trial is that the accused person has no right to a jury.
The moving party must appear for the trial with witnesses prepared to testify unless the accused
person stipulates in writing that the moving party’s declarations will constitute the case-in-chief
against him or her. If there is no stipulation, the parties should stipulate that the moving parties’
declarations will constitute the direct testimony of each declarant, with the declarant then subject
to cross-examination.
(c) Punishment. If the court finds the accused person guilty, the court may impose a fine
of up to $1,000, imprison the person for up to five days, or both, for each act of contempt. (Code
Civ. Proc., § 1218.) When the contempt consists of the omission to perform an act which is yet in
the power of the person to perform, the court may order that the person be imprisoned until the
act is performed.
3.99 MOTIONS
Motions for judgment on the pleadings, directed verdict, and mistrial must be made and
argued outside the hearing of the jurors, but if the ruling thereon affects the issues to be tried by
the jury, the trial judge, after consulting with counsel, may advise the jurors thereon. Upon
granting a motion to strike any evidence or argument to the jury, the trial judge will admonish the
jury to disregard the matter stricken.
DEFAULT JUDGMENT
ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENT
3.220 POST-JUDGMENT ORDERS
(a) Application for Money Deposited (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 708.710 - 708.795). An
application for an order for the payment of money which has been deposited with the clerk of the
court pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 708.710 et seq. must state: (1) the amount of
money and date it was deposited with the clerk, (2) any amount previously received by the
applicant, and (3) whether a claim of exemption or motion to vacate the judgment has been filed.
The clerk will endorse on the application the amount of money on deposit.
(b) Property Otherwise Deposited. An application to receive personal property or money,
other than that deposited pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure sections 708.710 – 708.795, must
state: (1) when, why and by whom it was deposited, (2) any term or condition of the deposit, (3)
the name and address of every person claiming any interest in it, and (4) the reason the claimant
is entitled to receive it. The clerk will endorse on the application the amount of money or
description of the property on deposit. The judge may require the applicant to proceed on noticed
motion.
(c) Execution on Installment Order or Judgment. An application for the issuance of a writ
of execution as to an order or judgment for the payment of money in installments must state: (1)
the pertinent provisions of the order or judgment, (2) the total amount which has been paid, (3)
the amount of principal then due, and (4) the calculations as to any interest claimed. If the
applicant is an assignee of the original creditor, the applicant must attach a copy of the
assignment and state the date of service or notice of the assignment to the judgment debtor.
JUDICIAL ARBITRATION