Equity Valuation 5 Examples and Some Answers From in Class
Equity Valuation 5 Examples and Some Answers From in Class
While discount rates obviously matter in DCF valuation, they don’t matter as much as
most analysts think they do.
- Must have Consistency (Euro must have a euro disc rate and cash flows)
- Consistent in the discount rate as well as the currency
▪ At an intuitive level, the discount rate used should be consistent with both the riskiness
and the type of cashflow being discounted.
− Equity versus Firm: If the cash flows being discounted are cash flows to
equity, the appropriate discount rate is a cost of equity.
− If the cash flows are cash flows to the firm, the appropriate discount rate
is the cost of capital.
− Discount rates should reflect the risk perceived by the marginal investor
in the company
▪ Currency: The currency in which the cash flows are estimated should also be the currency
in which the discount rate is estimated.
▪ Nominal versus Real: If the cash flows being discounted are nominal cash flows (i.e.,
reflect expected inflation), the discount rate should be nominal
about:blank 1/57
9/19/23, 1:24 PM Equity Valuation 5, examples and some answers from in class
- Risk-free
- The relative risk of the company (estimated beta)
- The price of risk depends on what investors want for equity
- Economic uncertainty is the most troublesome risk and cannot be taken away
- Risk cannot be fully taken away with risk
▪ In valuation, we estimate cash flows forever (or at least for very long time periods). The
right risk free rate to use in valuing a company in US dollars would be…
▪ Since we are valuing cashflows for the long term, we want a long-term risk-free
rate (rule out the 3-month T-bills rate) → Reinvestment risk
▪ Since the valuation is in US dollars (a nominal rate), we can also rule out the TIPS rate.
about:blank 2/57
9/19/23, 1:24 PM Equity Valuation 5, examples and some answers from in class
- If cash flow is nominal, then the real rate wont help
e) None of the above
▪ Since we are valuing cashflows for the long term, we want a long-term risk-free
rate (rule out the 3-month T-bills rate) → Reinvestment risk
▪ Since the valuation is in US dollars (a nominal rate), we can also rule out the TIPS rate.
▪ In practice, I would go with the 10-year bond for the following reasons:
− Most liquid of the treasuries (fresh auction rate from the previous
Monday)
− Getting other inputs such as equity risk premiums and default spreads
is easier with a 10-year rate than a 30-year rate
− Term structure flattens out by the time you get to the 10-year rate….
about:blank 3/57
9/19/23, 1:24 PM Equity Valuation 5, examples and some answers from in class
Spread Between 10-year Treasury Rate and 30- year Treasury Rate
about:blank 4/57
9/19/23, 1:24 PM Equity Valuation 5, examples and some answers from in class
▪ In January 2016, the Indian government had a local currency sovereign rating of Baa3. The
typical default spread (over a default free rate) for Baa3 rated country bonds was 2.44%.
▪ In January 2016, the Indian government had a local currency sovereign rating of Baa3. The
typical default spread (over a default free rate) for Baa3 rated country bonds was 2.44%.
▪ CDS spreads:
− Obtain the traded value for a sovereign Credit Default Swap (CDS) for
the emerging government.
− Default spread = Sovereign CDS spread (with perhaps an adjustment for
CDS market frictions).
- Looks at what the market pays for risk
about:blank 6/57
9/19/23, 1:24 PM Equity Valuation 5, examples and some answers from in class
about:blank 7/57
9/19/23, 1:24 PM Equity Valuation 5, examples and some answers from in class
about:blank 8/57
9/19/23, 1:24 PM Equity Valuation 5, examples and some answers from in class
Markets > government yields
▪ To get to a risk-free rate in nominal real, we can use one of three approaches.
− Approach 1: Government Bond spread
− The 2030 Brazil bond, denominated in US dollars, has a spread of 2.79%
▪ Assume you are valuing a company in US dollars, but you are wary about the risk free rate
being too low. Which of the following should you do?
a) Replace the current 10-year bond rate with a more reasonable normalized risk-
free rate (the average 10-year bond rate over the last 30 years has been about 5-6%)
- Cost of capital will be high and the return is low
- Cannot normalize risk free rates
b) Use the current 10-year bond rate as your risk-free rate but make sure that
your other assumptions (about growth and inflation) are consistent with the
risk-free rate
- Take the risk free rate and move on
c) Something else
▪ How negative can rates get? (Is there a bound?) ▪ Would you use these negative interest
rates as risk free rates?
− If no, why not and what would you do instead?
− If yes, what else would you have to do in your valuation to be internally
consistent?
▪ To estimate this risk premium, how long a time period should you use?
a) Just one year (last year)
- Wrong, heavily depends on what happens in the last year
b) Last 5 years (to reflect current conditions)
- Wrong stocks are volatile may get an okay standard deviation but not
about:blank 9/57
9/19/23, 1:24 PM Equity Valuation 5, examples and some answers from in class
Historical Market Premiums
▪ The historical market premium is the difference between the realized annual return from
investing in stocks and the realized return from investing in the risk-free security (treasuries)
▪ To estimate this risk premium, how long a time period should you use?
a) Just one year (last year)
- Wrong, heavily depends on what happens in the last year
b) Last 5 years (to reflect current conditions)
- Wrong, stocks are volatile, may get an okay standard deviation, but not
historical mean
c) As long a time periods as you can get the historical data for
d) Should match the time period on your risk-free rate
- No reason to use
e) Should match the time period used to estimate your beta
- Not relevant
▪ Assume that next year turns out to be a terrible year for stocks. If that occurs, you should
expect to see the historical market premium next year to
a) Go up
b) Go down
- Governments will typically lower rates, thus risk premium will go up but
historical will go down
- Put an RP of 1, what would you be willing to pay for a stock
▪ Add the default spread to a “mature” market premium: This default spread is added on to
the mature market premium to arrive at the total equity risk premium for Brazil, assuming a
mature market premium of 5.20%.
− Country Risk Premium for Brazil = 2.79%
− Total ERP for Brazil = 5.20% + 2.79% = 7.99%
Take country risk premium, and the standard deviation of S&P 500 and country index
- Divide the standard deviations and multiply by the risk premium
- Will underestimate risk due to illiquidity of emerging assets
▪ Problem: Focus just on revenues -- only variable that you consider, when weighting risk
exposure across markets -- you may be missing other exposures to country risk. For
example risk from location of production facilities in the emerging market.
▪ Exposure not adjusted or based upon beta: To the extent that the country risk premium is
multiplied by a beta, we are assuming that beta in addition to measuring exposure to all
other macro economic risk also measures exposure to country risk.
- Weighted RP is 5.9%
- Problem is that the revenue can be one country vs the world. Maybe use the GDP
weighted average
about:blank 12/57
9/19/23, 1:24 PM Equity Valuation 5, examples and some answers from in class
about:blank 13/57
9/19/23, 1:24 PM Equity Valuation 5, examples and some answers from in class
▪ Thus, a firm such as Embraer would have been valued with a cost of equity of 17-18%
even though it gets only 3% of its revenues in Brazil. As an investor, which of the following
consequences do you see from this approach?
a) Emerging market companies with substantial exposure in developed markets will
be significantly over valued by equity research analysts.
b) Emerging market companies with substantial exposure in developed
markets will be significantly under valued by equity research analysts.
▪ What would need to happen for you to make money of this strategy?
about:blank 14/57
9/19/23, 1:24 PM Equity Valuation 5, examples and some answers from in class
▪ If all analysts in the department used the arithmetic average premium (for stocks over
Tbills) for 1928-2018 of 6% to value stocks in 2018, given the implied premium of 4.19%,
what are they likely to find?
a) The values they obtain will be too low (most stocks will look overvalued)
b) The values they obtain will be too high (most stocks will look under valued)
c) There should be no systematic bias as long as they use the same premium to
value all stocks
about:blank 15/57
9/19/23, 1:24 PM Equity Valuation 5, examples and some answers from in class
- Implied premiums
about:blank 16/57
9/19/23, 1:24 PM Equity Valuation 5, examples and some answers from in class
about:blank 17/57
9/19/23, 1:24 PM Equity Valuation 5, examples and some answers from in class
▪ Excurse Solution:
− Modify the regression beta by adjusting the regression beta estimate,
by bringing in information about the fundamentals of the company
− Estimate the beta for the firm from the bottom up without employing
the regression technique. This will require
➢ understanding the business mix of the firm
➢ estimating the financial leverage of the firm
− Use an alternative measure of market risk not based upon a regression
about:blank 18/57
9/19/23, 1:24 PM Equity Valuation 5, examples and some answers from in class
▪ Proxy Models
− Look at historical returns on all stocks and look for variables that explain
differences in returns.
− You are, in effect, running multiple regressions with returns on individual
stocks as the dependent variable and fundamentals about these stocks as
independent variables.
− This approach started with market cap (the small cap effect) and over
the last two decades has added other variables (momentum, liquidity etc.)
Accounting risk measures: To the extent that you don’t trust market-priced based measures
of risk, you could compute relative risk measures based on
− Accounting earnings volatility: Compute an accounting beta or relative
volatility
− Balance sheet ratios: You could compute a risk score based upon
accounting ratios like debt ratios or cash holdings (akin to default risk
scores like the Z score)
- Cost of equity is typically twice the size as cost of debt
▪ Qualitative Risk Models: In these models, risk assessments are based at least partially on
qualitative factors (quality of management).
▪ Debt based measures: You can estimate a cost of equity, based upon an observable costs
of debt for the company.
− Cost of equity = Cost of debt * Scaling factor
about:blank 19/57
9/19/23, 1:24 PM Equity Valuation 5, examples and some answers from in class
accounting ratios like debt ratios or cash holdings (akin to default risk
scores like the Z score)
- Cost of equity is typically twice the size as cost of debt
▪ Qualitative Risk Models: In these models, risk assessments are based at least partially on
qualitative factors (quality of management).
▪ Debt based measures: You can estimate a cost of equity, based upon an observable costs
of debt for the company.
− Cost of equity = Cost of debt * Scaling factor
− The scaling factor can be computed from implied volatilities.
about:blank 20/57
9/19/23, 1:24 PM Equity Valuation 5, examples and some answers from in class
about:blank 21/57
9/19/23, 1:24 PM Equity Valuation 5, examples and some answers from in class
Bottom-up Betas
▪ We estimate “botton up” betas as an alternative to regression beats. To obtain bottom-up
beta for a firm, we average regression betas across “comparable” firms. Given a choice,
which of the following is likely to yield the best bottom up-beta?
a) A small sample of companies similar to yours
b) A large sample of companies that may have differences from yours
c) One company exactly like yours
d) Only your company is required for the regression
e) Three to five immediate competitors
about:blank 22/57
9/19/23, 1:24 PM Equity Valuation 5, examples and some answers from in class
- Minute 27 EV 5 part 2
▪ It should reflect default risk and the level of interest rates in the market
▪ The two most widely used approaches to estimating cost of debt are:
− Version 1: Looking up the yield to maturity on a straight bond outstanding from the
firm (if the firm has liquid straight bonds that are liquid issued)
− Version 2: Looking up the rating for the firm and estimating a default
spread based upon the rating (robust, but different bonds from the same
firm can have different ratings → use a median rating for the firm)
● Look at the synthetic rating, z score and interest coverage ratio
▪ Alternatives:
− Use the risk free rate and adjust Weighted Average Cost of Capital for
default risk
− Estimate a synthetic rating for your firm and the cost of debt based
about:blank 24/57
9/19/23, 1:24 PM Equity Valuation 5, examples and some answers from in class
Default Spreads Over Time
about:blank 25/57
9/19/23, 1:24 PM Equity Valuation 5, examples and some answers from in class
about:blank 26/57
9/19/23, 1:24 PM Equity Valuation 5, examples and some answers from in class
− 1.36% for the bond closest to 10 year maturity may misevaluate risk for
complete debt
▪ Approach 2:
− 0.85% risk free rate + Spread of 0.53% = 1.38% (spread my be biased
by Apple bond dominating the market)
about:blank 27/57
9/19/23, 1:24 PM Equity Valuation 5, examples and some answers from in class
y pp
▪ Approach 1:
− 1.2% for the average bonds outstanding adjusted for CRP, overweight of
short term rates / low interest rates because term structure is not linear
− 1.36% for the bond closest to 10 year maturity may misevaluate risk for
complete debt
▪ Approach 2:
− 0.85% risk free rate + Spread of 0.53% = 1.38% (spread my be biased
by Apple bond dominating the market)
▪ Approach 3:
− Altman z-score and implied rating: 1.48%
− Interest Coverage and implied rating: 1.48%
▪ Larger companies that derive a significant portion of their revenues in global markets may
be less exposed to country default risk. In other words, they may be able to borrow at a rate
lower than the government.
- Discount rate will be less than the market rate thus the loan will be trading
below 1 billion, thus it will be less than 50%
- Discount rate will be less than the market rate thus the loan will be trading
below 1 billion, thus it will be less than 50%
about:blank 29/57
9/19/23, 1:24 PM Equity Valuation 5, examples and some answers from in class
about:blank 30/57
9/19/23, 1:24 PM Equity Valuation 5, examples and some answers from in class
about:blank 31/57
9/19/23, 1:24 PM Equity Valuation 5, examples and some answers from in class
- Do not stay too far the equity premium when doing valuation
- EV2
about:blank 32/57
9/19/23, 1:24 PM Equity Valuation 5, examples and some answers from in class
about:blank 33/57
9/19/23, 1:24 PM Equity Valuation 5, examples and some answers from in class
▪ Most growth firms have difficulty sustaining their growth for long periods, especially while
earning excess returns.
about:blank 34/57
9/19/23, 1:24 PM Equity Valuation 5, examples and some answers from in class
▪ Most growth firms have difficulty sustaining their growth for long periods, especially while
earning excess returns.
- Don't wait too long
▪ It is not growth per se that creates value but growth with excess returns.
▪ For growth firms to continue to generate value creating growth, they have to be able to
keep the competition at bay.
− Proposition 1: The stronger and more sustainable the competitive advantages,
the longer a growth company can sustain “value creating” growth.
− Proposition 2: Growth companies with strong and sustainable competitive
advantages are rare.
▪ Assume that you are valuing a young, high growth firm with great potential, just after its
initial public offering. How long would you set your high growth period? (zoom)
a) < 5 years
b) 5 years
c) 10 years
d) >10 years
- Medium high growth is between 3-4 years
- Need to understand why they would keep such a competitive advantage in
the longer run
● Reinvestment rate is a function of the stable growth rate and the return on
capital in perpetuity that is forcasted
about:blank 35/57
9/19/23, 1:24 PM Equity Valuation 5, examples and some answers from in class
● Reinvestment rate is a function of the stable growth rate and the return on
capital in perpetuity that is forcasted
Typical Assumptions
▪ A typical assumption in many DCF valuations, when it comes to stable growth, is that
− Capital expenditures offset depreciation
− There are no working capital needs.
− Stable growth firms “just” have to make maintenance cap ex (replacing
existing assets ) to deliver growth.
▪ If you make this assumption, what expected growth rate can you use in your terminal value
computation?
▪ What if the stable growth rate = inflation rate? Is it okay to make this assumption then?
- If growing at the inflation rate, then you must account for reinvestment at inflation
(buying new equipment and purchases)
- A company needs to reinvest to grow
Be Consistent
▪ Risk and costs of equity and capital, stable growth firms tend to
− Have betas closer to one
− Have debt ratios closer to industry averages (or mature company
averages)
− Country risk premiums (especially in emerging markets should evolve
about:blank 36/57
9/19/23, 1:24 PM Equity Valuation 5, examples and some answers from in class
A company needs to reinvest to grow
Be Consistent
▪ Risk and costs of equity and capital, stable growth firms tend to
− Have betas closer to one
− Have debt ratios closer to industry averages (or mature company
averages)
− Country risk premiums (especially in emerging markets should evolve
over time)
- If groth comes down, cost of capital needs to decrease as well
- Mature companies are typically at 7.5%
▪ The reinvestment needs and dividend payout ratios should reflect the lower growth and
excess returns:
− Stable period payout ratio = 1 - g/ ROE
− Stable period reinvestment rate = g/ ROC
Lower net cap reinvestme, etc. leeads to lower EV/EBITDA multiples, Low Working capital
means high EV/EBITDA
about:blank 37/57
9/19/23, 1:24 PM Equity Valuation 5, examples and some answers from in class
about:blank 38/57
9/19/23, 1:24 PM Equity Valuation 5, examples and some answers from in class
about:blank 39/57
9/19/23, 1:24 PM Equity Valuation 5, examples and some answers from in class
about:blank 41/57
9/19/23, 1:24 PM Equity Valuation 5, examples and some answers from in class
about:blank 42/57
9/19/23, 1:24 PM Equity Valuation 5, examples and some answers from in class
Exercise – Apple
about:blank 43/57
9/19/23, 1:24 PM Equity Valuation 5, examples and some answers from in class
Exercise – Apple
▪ Apple started to pay dividends in 2013 with an approximate payout rate of 25%, you
assume for the following years (2020 to 2024) Apple will continue with its payout policy and
dividends are payed in September each year.
▪ Assume the company is expected to increase its payout ratio to 50% in 2025 and at the
same time the growth is expected to drop to 2.1% (starting with year 2024 to 2025)
▪ Assume the cost of equity in the high growth is 6.7% and in the stable growth 6.0%.
▪ For reasons of simplification, assume the 2020 dividends have just been payed.
- Minute 20
about:blank 44/57
9/19/23, 1:24 PM Equity Valuation 5, examples and some answers from in class
about:blank 45/57
9/19/23, 1:24 PM Equity Valuation 5, examples and some answers from in class
Some Open Questions (1) The Value of Cash
▪ The Value of Cash
− The simplest and most direct way of dealing with cash and marketable
▪ In which of the following firms is cash most likely to be A) a neutral asset (worth 100), B) a
wasting asset (worth less than 100) or C) a potential value creator (worth more than 100)
▪ For majority holdings, with full consolidation, convert the minority interest from book value
to market value by applying a price to book ratio (based upon the sector average for the
subsidiary) to the minority interest.
− Estimated market value of minority interest = Minority interest on
balance sheet * Price to Book ratio for sector (of subsidiary)
− Subtract this from the estimated value of the consolidated firm to get to
value of the equity in the parent company.
▪ For minority holdings in other companies, convert the book value of these holdings (which
are reported on the balance sheet) into market value by multiplying by the price to book ratio
of the sector(s). Add this value on to the value of the operating assets to arrive at total firm
value
▪ Be wary of your conservative impulses which will tell you to count everything as debt (such
as all liabilities). That will push up the debt ratio and lead you to understate your cost of
capital.
about:blank 47/57
9/19/23, 1:24 PM Equity Valuation 5, examples and some answers from in class
about:blank 48/57
9/19/23, 1:24 PM Equity Valuation 5, examples and some answers from in class
▪ The true test of your valuation skills is when you have to value “difficult” companies. In
particular, the challenges are greatest when valuing:
about:blank 49/57
9/19/23, 1:24 PM Equity Valuation 5, examples and some answers from in class
▪ The true test of your valuation skills is when you have to value “difficult” companies. In
particular, the challenges are greatest when valuing:
− Young companies, early in the life cycle, in young businesses
− Companies that don’t fit the accounting mold
− Companies that face substantial truncation risk (default or
nationalization risk)
about:blank 50/57
9/19/23, 1:24 PM Equity Valuation 5, examples and some answers from in class
about:blank 51/57
9/19/23, 1:24 PM Equity Valuation 5, examples and some answers from in class
about:blank 52/57
9/19/23, 1:24 PM Equity Valuation 5, examples and some answers from in class
about:blank 53/57
9/19/23, 1:24 PM Equity Valuation 5, examples and some answers from in class
Exercise
Solution
about:blank 54/57
9/19/23, 1:24 PM Equity Valuation 5, examples and some answers from in class
Solution
about:blank 55/57
9/19/23, 1:24 PM Equity Valuation 5, examples and some answers from in class
Valuation of a firm
about:blank 56/57
9/19/23, 1:24 PM Equity Valuation 5, examples and some answers from in class
Valuation of a firm
about:blank 57/57