Final Project

ENG3- 2022-2

Objective React and give a personal opinion about art and history-related situations.

Date December 9th (Written section, via Forums)

December 12th and 14th (Oral section, face-to-face)

Instructions

● Read the following statements:

History The Arts

Sports like soccer receive more attention The price of art should be regulated
and funding than other sports, limiting their because some pieces are excessively
opportunities. expensive.
Chilean coup d’état was necessary for the The use of animals is justified if it is for the
society and the economy. sake of creating art.
COVID quarantine and vaccination were Since graffiti is art, it does not require
successful to control the situation. permission and could be anywhere.
Cloning can be ethical, as an example to Interpretive arts, such as human museums
prevent the extinction of species. and/or theatre are not real art.
The use of animals for science is justified, Chile is rich in terms of opportunities to see
since it helps human wellbeing. art if you live in the right place.

Written section:

 Choose one of these statements and react to it, giving your personal opinion about it
in a U-Campus forum post.
 Your post should be between 100 and 150 words long.
 Make sure to include concrete information to support your ideas.
 You are highly recommended to comment on your classmates’ opinions.

Oral section:

 Pick the most convenient time for you to take this evaluation in Google Calendar.
 Attend the classroom (no audience) and select two random statements.
 Choose the one that makes you feel more comfortable and prepare your ideas for 1
minute.
 Speak between 2:30 and 3:00 minutes about your opinion, using concrete
information to support your ideas.

1
 ENG3- 2022-2
Final Project (30%)

Written Section Checklist (10%)

Criteria Accomplished Partially Not

(2 Points) Accomplished Accomplished
(1 Point) (0 Points)
The answer is between 100 and 150 words long.

The answer develops an opinion about the statement.

The answer includes details to support ideas.

The answer makes clear reference to the statement.

The answer is logically connected through rhetorical

devices
The answer has a clear introduction, development and
conclusion.
The answer considers opinion-related vocabulary.

The answer is intelligible due to minor (or no) syntax

errors.
Total / 16

2
 ENG3- 2022-2
Final Project (30%)
Oral Section Rubric (20%)

Name:_______________________________________ Score:_______/20 Mark:_______________

Descriptors 4 3 2 1

Discourse is natural, engaging, and Discourse is sometimes natural, Choppy discourse makes the Presentation sounds mechanical and
Speaking dynamic using communicative engaging and dynamic. There is interaction seem unnatural half choppy, which makes discourse less
Skills resources. Presentation is easy to some “choppy” speech that may the time. It appears less fluent or difficult to decode.
be understood clearly by the and make the discourse less fluent or monotonous.
teacher. monotonous.

Content Student completely includes key Student include some of the Student misses to deliver some of Student does not seem to manage or
content of the units: (simple past, contents of the units, but they need the key content from the to understand the content of the unit.
past continuous, adverbs of improvement. guidelines, missing relevant
manner, adjectives -ed -ing). details.

Coherence Ideas are clear, connected with the Ideas are clear and connected with Ideas presented lose their focus Ideas are not connected with the
and statement and logically connected the statement, though they lack from time to time and/or are a statement.
Cohesion to one another. effective connectors and sequence. series of unconnected sentences.

Correction Occasional mistakes are made Some mistakes are made while There are some mistakes in the The student only produces simple
when attempting to produce delivering the information and they use of the tense, which make grammatical structures and struggles
complex grammatical structures, tend to hinder understanding. Minor understanding difficult. with them. Elementary mistakes are
although they do not hinder interference with L1 syntax. Interference with L1 syntax is constantly made, which make the
understanding. Appropriate syntax evident. message difficult to understand for
in most cases according to the their interlocutor.
information provided.

3
 ENG3- 2022-2
Final Project (30%)

Fluency Pronunciation is clear and Pronunciation includes some Pronunciation, inflection, and/or
understandable. Speech is fluent, mistakes, which tend to affect expression significantly confused
effective and there are only some intelligibility; fluency and pace communication.
mistakes that do not affect mildly hinders comprehension.
intelligibility.

Range A variety of lexical items, idioms and The student used lexical items, The student used some of the lexical
collocations from class was used to idioms, and collocations from items, idioms, and collocations from
communicate effectively. Student class, but at times it appeared class.
used extensive vocabulary and contrived.
expressions from the units.

TOTAL: 22 OBTAINED: