MSIL Audit Cheklist 16
MSIL Audit Cheklist 16
Audit Person
Cluster Name Hanon Systems India Pvt Ltd
(Audit Score)
Achieved Score:
Total Score:
46 Vendor (Tier 1) person
×100 = 41
112
Total
Subject: Vendor System Assessment Part Number:
Part Name:
Observation:-
0 1 2
1 4/8 0 4 0 1.Production
preparation
2.Regulation for initial
production control
2 3/6 0 3 0
6 3/6 0 3 0
7 2/2 0 0 1
8 8 / 12 0 4 2 14.Crit
i
13.Ha
9 7 / 10 0 3 2 Total
10 7 / 10 0 3 2
11 0/8 0 0 0
12 0 / 10 0 0 0
13 0/4 0 0 0
14 0/ 6 0 0 0 of standards
10.Equipment/ 9.5S management 8.Handling abnormality
15 0/6 0 Ach0ie ed 0 Inspection in quality
v equipment's
management
16 0/4 0 0 0
Total 46
/ 112 0 28 9
(MSI
L)
Pre decided negative marking Improvement Submission Date Last Audit Rating First time
(if any)
r
Approved
Audit Date
Audit Person
ocess
verification
First time
r
Supplier 0
Name
Part Name 0
1
Regarding implementation rule of 1
production preparation
Regarding management /
implementation by production
preparation plan / report (master
1. 2 plan) 1
Production
preparation /
New Product
Developmen t
Regulation for
2. Regulation
initial production control
for
initial
production
control 2
2
Implementation of initial 1
production control
1
Definition and implementation of 1
changing management
Supplier 0
Name
Part Name 0
Category Audit Area Concerning regulation
3. Changing
management 2
2
Definition and control method for
initial part
2
4. Standards
management Procedure to control standards
・Process control standards
・Inspection specifications
2 ・Operation instructions 1
1
2
5. Education
and training
Supplier 0
Name
Part Name 0
Activity to keep/improve
production quality
1 1
6.
Quality audit 1
and process
verification
2 Content of process review
7. Supplier 1
Evaluation method for new 1
control suppliers
1
Handling when abnormal situation
occurs
Handling when abnormal situation 2
1
occurs
1
8. Handling
abnormality in
quality
Supplier 0
Name
Part Name 0
Prevention of recurrence
・Customer claims
・In process failure 2
・Suppliers failure
3
1
9.
5S 3
management
2
Production equipment's
management
10.
Equipment/I
nspection Maintenance of equipment's , jigs
equipment's 1 and tools
10. 2
Equipment/I
nspection Maintenance of equipment's , jigs
equipment's 1 and tools
Supplier 0
Name
Part Name 0
management 3
2
Maintenance of inspection
equipment's
2
1
11.
Implementati
1 Implementation of standards
on of
standards
3
12. Products 3
management
Supplier 0
Name
Part Name 0
13.
Handling
Management 1
14.
Critical parts 1 Maru A Parts Management 2
Management
14.
Critical parts 1 Maru A Parts Management
Management
15.
Adequate 1
testing
facility 2
1 Testing Facility
2
VENDOR ATTENDEES :
0
Concerning regulation
VENDOR ATTENDEES :
0
Concerning regulation
VENDOR ATTENDEES :
0
Concerning regulation
Do you periodically monitor the skill of certificated operators and
follow up to improve their skill?
VENDOR ATTENDEES :
0
Concerning regulation
VENDOR ATTENDEES :
0
Concerning regulation
Concerning regulation
Achieved Score
Maximum Score
Audit Rating
Requirements
- FMEA Procedure
- FMEA / QA matrix.
- Past defect history and Potential defect included in FMEA.
- List of Quality issues / defect faced In-house and Customer end during trials.
- Their complete analysis in the form of PDCA.
Initial Supply Control Procedure including
- Initial Supply Control period (3month for new parts)
- person responsible to announce start/end of initial supply control
- Control items & inspection method (check method) and criteria for selection of control
item
- Criteria for termination of initial supply control period
Evidence of Process capability study / defect rate (rejection % or ppm) monitoring and
action if not meeting the target as decided for product and critical parameters as
mentioned in Spec. Meeting or Critical parameters decided by supplier
Procedure / WI for expected change (4M : Operator, machine & jig/die, material and
method change) and unexpected changes (Tool breakage, power failure, machine
breakdown, inspection equipment failure etc.).
Rules to be defined from sharing information to the concerned person / Deptt up to the
result confirmation of product produced before and after the change.
Recording of product quality check with product details like Lot no, quantity and
marking on products etc.
- Process control std, control Plan, Inspection standard and operation Instruction of all
parts.
- Review system and records of updated std against a change.
- Retention period of documents and records
Coherence between all documents like PCS / Control plan, inspection standard,
operation standard and MIS -P.
WI for Skill evaluation criteria level wise, evaluation frequency and method.
Cross checking of operator's skill periodically against a decided parameter and by
simulating defect.
Evidence of retraining plan and effectiveness check.
Plan and evidence of conducting Internal Quality system Audit. Action taken for
improvement against the Quality Issues observed during audit.
Evidence of process audit based on work instructions / PCS and actual working.
Process with poor workability
New Supplier selection procedure indicating supplier audit check sheet & min qualifying
criteria especially for quality.
Evidence of audit done and supplier list
Procedure for handling suspected parts at the time of abnormal situation including
criteria for estimating suspected parts (quantity produced before abnormal situation)
5 Why Analysis/Root Cause Analysis to be done for the defects Criteria for raising A-3
sheet/DAR for internal and supplier issue
Storage of RM, BOP, WIP, FG and bins/trolleys to prevent from dust, rust, scratch,
deformation and rainwater (Shop floor audit)
Storage of RM, BOP, WIP & FG parts at designated location with tag for visual control
- Unwanted Material Control at work place(Red Tag area) There is exist
possibility of mix-up of FG/WIP/Rework part
-Temporary storage
Inspection or critical operation under properly controlled environment:
- temperature
- humidity
- noise
- Proper layout/ arrangements on work and inspection table
- lux level etc.
Physical condition of production equipment's, jigs and tools Evidence of daily/ regular
check
Storage arrangements with identification
Frequency of polishing and replacement for consumable tools and change records
Calibration record of inspection Equipment's
Calibration status on inspection Equipment's (Calibration date & due date)
Expiry date on limit samples (for objective judgments such as appearance inspection)
Periodic records of operator observance audit to check operator working as per various
standard such as WI, PCS, Daily check etc.
Judgment criteria should be mentioned on each check sheet (e.g..- Upper/ Lower
tolerance, check method and criteria )
Incoming Material / WIP / Finish Goods to be maintained with Identification Tags and
storage location at each stage.
Production Date/ Lot/ Qty/ dispatch date to be recorded for traceability purpose.
Separate area/ red bin for storing NC part with tag Reason marking on NC part
- Rework procedure/WI
- Responsibility for Rework and area/table for rework
- Inspection record of rework material
- Traceability (Lot detail) of Reworked Material
WI to maintain Bins/Trolleys ( WIP & FG) in good condition Cleaning and repairing
area and check points of good bin/trolleys
Special check points for Maru A parts in Inspection standards (in- process & final) as
per inspection standard/drawing
Follow Up
Follow Up
Follow Up
Follow Up
Follow Up
Follow Up
Date:
Auditors:
Remarks
Judgment
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
0
112
0
73
MARUTI VE
Supplier
0
Name
Part Name
Category Audit Area
Management information 3
1
1
Organisation Structure 1
E
1.1
1.2
1.3
2 Quality Systems
1.4
1.5
5 MSME Category
1
7 Industrial Climate
8
9
7 Industrial Climate
Scale of Organisation
10
11
4
Capability to
invest for 1
Investment Capability for
future Future Expansion 5
expansion
6
2 Make of Machine
Adequate
Manufactu 3 Life of Machine
ring
capability
4 Machine condition
ring
capability
Availability of Auxiliary
5 Equipments
Concerning regulation
Date of issue
Expiry Date
2013-14
2014-15
2015-16
2013-14
2014-15
2015-16
Union exists ?
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Contract : 70
Permanent : 56
Yes
Yes
R
T (Tier -2)
7/28/2016
Remarks Follow Up
No registered
Location
15~16 3. 14~15 15~16
Rejecio
n PPM
at
Hanon
Target Monthly Avrg
NA
Monthly Avrg Remarks :-
Quality Imp. By (%) Delivery Imp.
By (%)
15~16
Activity
Press Machines
& Related
Infrastruture
Details
Does supplier has parts with progressive tooling parts? Does supplier has press facility for same?
Which Make of the machines are used?
Does the suppliers check Press parallellsim (Bottom and Top Plate) and Press Alignment?
T Slot / cushion hole condition?
Does the Cushion pin checking (Length, height, bending check and standardisation) is done
Stroke length (chal) and shut height (slight) adjustment: Is same or available tool wise?
Does Supplier has standard clamping?
Safety: 2 button press operation is there or safety mechanism? Pls specify?
Does supplier uses standard parallel blocks
Does shut height indicator available?
Does the moving parts of Press is covered?
Does the Supplier has decoiling facility in case of coil blanking/progressive tools parts.
Does the Supplier has lifter facility for tool loading and unloading.
Status
Yes
ISGEC, Yangli, Press master
Yes
Good
Yes
Yes
Yes
PLANNING
TOTAL 0
RECEIVING DATE
VERIFICATION
VERIFICATION
TOTAL 0
AUDIT POINT
VENDOR NAME 0
PLANNING
CLUSTER NAME Hanon Systems India Pvt Ltd
AUDIT DATE
VERIFICATION
AUDIT PART NAME 0
RESULT OF VERIFICATION
RESULT OF VERIFICATION
Good Points Weak points
Positive Management Retroactive inspecti
Good ventilation in shop floor Criteria for declarin Moulding and
secondary operation at same place Skill evaluation crite In-house Manufacturing of Facility for
moulds CAPA format does Good procedures and implemenation why-
why analysis f RM storage, FIFO in RM store
Adequate testing facility
on during 4M changes
g suspected parts produced during abnomral situations ria
not ask for identification & validation of potential defects,
or occurrence & defects, standardization & horizontal deployment
Good Points Weak points
Positive Management Retroactive inspecti
Good ventilation in shop floor Criteria for declarin Moulding and
secondary operation at same place Skill evaluation crite In-house Manufacturing of Facility for
moulds CAPA format does Good procedures and implemenation why-
why analysis f RM storage, FIFO in RM store
Adequate testing facility
nges
produced during abnomral situations ria
cation & validation of potential defects,
efects, standardization & horizontal deployment