Research Assignments
Research Assignments
ASSIGNMENTS
FOR
INFO135 INFORMATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH
METHODS
ASSIGNMENT 1: INDIVIDUAL (Due date: 4/5/24)
a. State the sources of research problem. [4]
b. What is a research proposal? Formulate a research proposal based on the following
theme: Innovation and Industrialization. [25]
c. Elaborate the difference between dependent, independent, and intervening variables in
information systems research using practical examples. [9]
d. Describe cross-sectional research and longitudinal research using practical examples in
the area of information systems to distinguish them. [10]
e. Distinguish probability and non-probability sampling, with suitable examples. [12]
[Total:50]
QUESTION 1 [Group 1, 4]
Carryout a literature review on the following research topic: Artificial Intelligence,
healthcare transformation and Consequences. A case of Zimbabwe healthcare system.
NB: The following sections must guide you in crafting your proposal: Introduction,
Theoretical literature review, Empirical literature review, Gaps identified, Conceptual
literature review, Conclusion, and References (Include all references using Harvard style, not
more than 4 pages including references, and Avoid plagiarism). [25]
QUESTION 2 [Group 3, 6, 7]
A psychologist asked 154 patients who suffered from panic attacks to take part in a clinical
trial to assess the effectiveness of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT). In order to select
suitable participants for the trial, each patient completed a questionnaire which measured the
severity of their symptoms on a scale of 1 (mild) to 10 (severe). 60 patients who had moderate
symptoms with scores of 7 or 8 were selected to take part. They were randomly allocated to
one of three conditions. ● Condition 1: Traditional cognitive behavioural therapy – this
consisted of 12 one-hour sessions over a 12-week period. ● Condition 2: Brief cognitive
behavioural therapy – this consisted of 5 one-hour sessions over a 5- week period with
homework assessments. ● Condition 3: Control condition – patients were placed on a 12-week
waiting list for traditional cognitive behavioural therapy. This group did not receive any form
of treatment during the 12 weeks. One week after finishing the course of therapy, patients in
condition 1 and condition 2 completed the questionnaire for a second time. Patients in condition
3 completed the questionnaire for a second time at the end of the 12-week period. The three
scores from this questionnaire were compared to see if there were differences in the severity of
symptoms.
a. Identify one variable which does not appear to have been controlled in this trial. Explain
how this may have influenced the outcome. [3]
b. The length and complexity of research designs can vary considerably. What are the key
activities that any sound design would do? [5]
c. What is meant by ‘validity’? How could the psychologist have assessed the validity of
the questionnaire used to measure the severity of symptoms? [4]
d. The psychologist asked the 60 patients for fully informed consent to take part in this
trial. What should the psychologist have told the patients so that they were able to give
their consent? [5]
The psychologist wished to investigate which aspects of therapy were most useful. She
decided to interview a sample of the patients.
e. Explain how you would record the data from these interviews and your reason for
choosing this method. [3]
f. Explain how you would analyse the qualitative data from the interviews. [5]
QUESTION 3 [Group 2, 5, 8]
Some studies have suggested that there may be a relationship between intelligence and
happiness. To investigate this claim, a psychologist used a standardised test to measure
intelligence in a sample of 30 children aged 11 years, who were chosen from a local secondary
school. He also asked the children to complete a self-report questionnaire designed to measure
happiness. The score from the intelligence test was correlated with the score from the happiness
questionnaire. The psychologist used a Spearman’s rho test to analyse the data. He found that
the correlation between intelligence and happiness at age 11 was +0.42.