14 - Points of Quaid
14 - Points of Quaid
(I)Introduction
(III) The emergence of new challenges for the AIML from the rival
platform
(III) Remained the focal point of Muslim politics in the decade of 1930’s
(6) Summing Up
1
(I)Introduction
2
(III) The emergence of new challenges for the AIML from the rival
platform
(5) The comparison between the Nehru Report and the Fourteen Points
Similarities
Constitutional Documents
Demand: Substantial Constitutional concessions: Desire of Indian to
have Dominion status…
Separation of Sind from Bombay, and Reforms in NWFP and Baluchistan
Differences
(I) Differences over form of government: Both demand Federal
form. But the nature the authors of the documents demanded
was conspicuously different.
(II) Rights of Minorities …
(III) Separate Electorates: Nehru Report outrightly rejected the S.E.
(IV) Separation of Sindh from Bombay:
(V) N.R was not ready to concede the demand of one-third Muslim
representation in the Centre…
(VI) Provincial autonomy: Greater degree of provincial autonomy
was conceded in the Fourteen Points.
(VII) Nehru Report was a more detailed and comprehensive
document. It was full-fledged Constitution framed by Indians.
Fourteen Points, on the other hand, were the minimum Charter
of Muslim demands which Muslims wanted to see incorporated
in any constitution.
(VIII) Nehru rejected the demand of one-third Muslim
representation in the cabinets
(IX) Another issue of divergence was the reservation of seats in
4
Punjab and Bengal.
(X) Their perception of Hindu-Muslim Question: N.R(Cultural);
Fourteen Points (Political).
Conclusion:
5
(I) Act of Jinnah’s statesmanship.
(II) Also highlighted disillusionment that Q.A. felt after rejection of
Muslim demands in the N.R.
(III) The made it abundantly clear that the political trajectories
[figurative] of Hindus and Muslims were conspicuously
different/ at poles apart.
(IV) Paradigmatic shift in the Muslim politics