Labour Supply
Labour Supply
Outline
24 hours in a day
Time endowment = 16 hours? (we must sleep!)
How do we allocate this time between
leisure
labour
at home (we ignore it for now)
in the market
The theory of labour supply
Time endowment = leisure (L) + labour supply (H)
Labour supply = time endowment - leisure
Labour supply = demand of leisure
We will treat leisure just like a normal good and we
will apply standard consumption theory:
preferences
price of consumption good (wage, opportunity cost)
wealth (financial and real wealth)
The choice between labour and leisure
Two goods:
1. leisure
2. consumption goods
Budget constraint
consumption goods are bought with the revenues
obtained from selling leisure
the more you work the more you can consume but
the less leisure you can enjoy
Preferences over consumption and leisure
4 properties:
curves closer to the origin are associated with lower
levels of utility (B>A)
the are negatively sloped
they are convex (scarce goods are valued more)
they are parallel (never cross)
Convexity of indifference curves
(Y4-Y3)=(Y2-Y1)
but (H4-H3)<(H2-H1)
The slope of the indifference curves
Moving along one indifference curve consumption
and leisure change but, by definition, utility remains
constant
Hence the sum of the effect on utility of the changes
in consumption and leisure along one indifference
curve must be zero
What is the effect on utility of a variation in Y?
∆UY = MUY x ∆Y
What is the effect on utility of a variation in L?
∆UL = MUL x ∆L
The slope of the indifference curves
Along the same indifference curve, the sum of
these variations must be zero:
∆U = ∆UY + ∆UL = (MUY x ∆Y) + (MUL x ∆L) = 0
From this expression we can easily derive the slope
of the indifference curves:
(MUY x ∆Y) + (MUL x ∆L) = 0
∆Y/∆L = - MUL / MUY
The slope of the indifference curves equal (minus)
the ratio of the marginal utility of leisure and
income/consumption.
Indifference curves of different
individuals
The budget constraint
Budget set: set of all combinations of consumption
and leisure that are affordable for the individual
Example:
V= wealth/non-labour income
T hours in the time endowment
w hourly wage
C = consumption (= income (Y), no savings)
all and only the consumption-leisure combinations
satisfying the following constraint can be bought:
The budget constraint
An alternative way to write the budget constraint is
the following
Recall that L=T-H
The budget constraint
Example:
T = 16; w = 8; V = 0; p=1
if the agent works 16 hours (H=0) she can consume
16x8=128 (point E)
if she works 0 hours (H=16) she can consume zero (point D)
Optimality condition:
The choice not to work is a “corner” solution
Income and substitution effects
Pure income effect
What is the effect of an increase in non-labour
income (V) holding all other things fixed?
the intercept of the budget constraint increases but the
slope does not change
the budget constraint shifts parallel upward
C 𝒘 ·𝑳 𝒘·𝑻 𝑽
𝒔𝒍𝒐𝒑𝒆 𝒊𝒏𝒕𝒆𝒓𝒄𝒆𝒑𝒕
Intuitively:
with a higher wage the agent can consume the same and
work less (income effect)
each hour of work is now remunerated more so there is
an incentive to work more (substitution effect)
w
w*
Hours of leisure
Hours of work
Formal derivation of labour
supply
Utility maximisation
∗ ∗