Research Midterm
Research Midterm
Objective of Research
Definition of Research
There are almost as many definition of research as there are many authors writing
about the subject.
Treece and Treece commented that “research in its broadest sense is an attempt to
gain solutions to problems. More precisely, it is the collection of data in a rigorously
controlled situation for the purpose of prediction or explanation.
Crawford, from his definition, has given some characteristics of research as follows:
1. Research gathers new knowledge or data from primary or first-hand sources. It is not
research when one merely restates or merely reorganizes what is already known or
what has been written. Research places emphasis upon the discovery of general
principles. It goes beyond the specific groups and situation investigated, and, by careful
sampling procedures, infers qualities of the entire population from those observed in the
smaller group.
3. Research is logical and objective, applying every possible test to verify the data
collected and the procedures employed. The researcher constantly strives to eliminate
personal feeling and preference. He resists the temptation to seek only the data that
support his hypothesis. There is no attempt to persuade or to prove. The emphasis is on
testing, rather than on proving the hypothesis. The researcher elevates clear thinking
and logic. He suppresses feeling and emotion in his analysis.
5. Research is carefully recorded and report. Every term is carefully defined, all
procedures are described in detail, all limiting factors are recognized, all references are
carefully documented, and all results are objectively recorded. All conclusions and
generalizations are cautiously arrived at, with due consideration for all of the limitations
of methodology, data collected, and errors of human interpretation.
Differences between Research and Problem-Solving
The researcher must be able to distinguish between research and problem-solving. His
supposed research problem may only be good for problem-solving. The differences
between the two are summarized as follows:
There are many kinds of research which are classified according to their distinctive
features. Some of the classifications are as follows:
4. According to the type of analysis. According to the type of analysis, Weiss classifies
research into analytic research and holistic research.
a. In the analytic approach, the researcher attempts to identify and isolate the
components of the research situation.
b. The holistic approach begins with the total situation, focusing attention on the
system first and then on its internal relationship.
5. According to scope. Under this category is action research. This type of research is
done on a very limited scope to solve a particular problem which is not so big. It is
almost problem-solving.
Babbie gives the following as some of the hindrances to scientific inquiry. They are
mostly errors in personal judgment.
1. Tradition. This is accepting the customs, beliefs, practices, and superstitions are true
and are parts of the daily lives of men. No effort is exerted to find out whether they are
true or not. For example, there is a traditional belief among some women that women
who are conceiving should avoid eating dark or black food such as black berries
because their children will become dark also. This may be true or not, but many women
believe and practice it without verifying its true. People have the idea that when
everybody does a thing, it is true. This belief is a hindrance to scientific investigation.
7. Illogical reasoning. This is attributing something to another without any logical basis.
For instance, because of the extended good weather it may rain at the weekend. Or,
because it is sunny it will not rain that day. Or, when a woman is believed to be a
sorcerer. These are beliefs without any logical basis and no effort is exerted to verify
them.
11. Dogmatism. This is an addition. This is an unwritten policy of certain institutions and
governments prohibiting the study of topics that are believed to run counter to the
established doctrines of such institutions or governments. Thus in communistic states, it
is unlikely that one studies and writes about the beauty of democracy. There is a veiled
prohibition to study and write about the beauty and adoption of communism. It may be a
remote possibility that a research student in Christian church-related school can make a
study about the non-existence of God. It is unlikely also that one advocates the adoption
of polygamy in a Christian community because his study findings say that polygamy is
good.
References:
Aquino, Guadencio V., Essentials of Research and Thesis Writing. Quezon City:
Alemars-Phoenix Publishing House, Inc., 1974
Treece, Eleonor Walters and James William Treece, Jr. The Elements of Research in
Nursing. Saint Louis: C.V. Mosby Company, Inc., 1973. (Reprinted by Phoenix Press,
Inc.)
Treece, Eleonor Walters and James William Treece, Jr. The Elements of Research in
Nursing. Second Edition. Saint Louis: C.V. Mosby Company, Inc., 1977. (Reprinted by
Phoenix Press, Inc.)
2. Forming a hypothesis;
It should be borne in mind that the research goes through all the nine steps when the
researcher does and writes his research report. If the standard format of thesis writing is
followed, the first two steps will be included in Chapter 1, “The Problem and Its Setting”,
the third step will be in Chapter 2, “Related Literature and Studies”, the fourth, fifth, and
sixth steps will be discussed in Chapter 3,” Methods of Research and Procedures”, the
seventh step will be presented in Chapter 4, “Analysis, Presentation, and Interpretation
of Data”, and the last two steps will be placed in Chapter 5, Summary, Conclusions, and
Recommendations”.
1. Rigid control
2. Objectivity,
4. Rigorous standards.
Rigid control refers to the manipulation of the research variables. Variables are those
things that vary in quantity and quality which are to be manipulated by the researcher.
Examples of variables are age, sex, population, adequacy, efficiency, etc. There are
variables which should be controlled rigidly, that is kept constant or equal in a certain
research work.
Objectivity means that there should be no bias or partiality in treating the results of the
inquiry. The results should not be tampered with, whatever they may be.
The fourth principle refers to the setting up of standards or principles which serves as
bases for evaluating the findings of a study. Such standard should not be changed to
suit the expectations of the researcher. The principle also refers to the accurate
statistical computation and interpretation of quantified data.
Definition
A problem is (1) any significant, perplexing and challenging situation, real or artificial,
the solution of which requires reflective hinking; (2) a perplexing situation after it has
been translated into a question or series of questions that help determine the direction
of subsequently inquiry. The foregoing definitions are according to Dewy.
Elements of a Research Problem
1. Aim or purpose of the problem for investigation. This answers the question
“Why?” Why is there an investigation, inquiry or study?
2. The subject matter or topic to be investigated. This answers the question “What?”
What is to be investigated or studied?
3. The place or locale where the research is to be conducted. This answers the
question “Where?” Where is the study to be conducted?
4. The period or time of the study during which the data are to be gathered. This
answers the question “When?” When is the study to be carried out?
5. Population or universe from whom the data are to be collected. This answers the
question “Who?” or “From Whom?” Who are the respondents? From whom are the data
to be gathered?
There are certain guidelines or criteria in the selection of a research problem to make it
more interesting and the research work more enjoyable to the researcher as well as to
ensure the completion of the study. Among the guidelines or criteria are the following
which may also be considered as characteristics of research problems:
1. The research problem or topic must be chosen by the researcher himself. This is
to avoid blaming others or offering excuses for any obstacle encountered.
2. It must be within the interest of the researcher. This is to make sure that the
researcher will focus his full attention on the research work.
3. It must be within the specialization of the research. This will in some way make
the work easier for him because he is working on familiar grounds. Besides, this may
improve his specialization, skill, and competence in his profession.
a. Data are available and accessible. The researcher must be sure that the
participants in his investigation possess the needed data and that they are within is
reach. So, one must not choose a problem in which the locations of the data are too far
away, say foreign lands.
c. Answers to the specific questions (sub problems) can be found. The data
to be collected must supply the necessary answers to the specific questions. Suppose
the question is “How qualified are the teachers handling science?” The data to be
gathered are the educational attainments and the fields of specialization of the teacher
to be checked against the regulations of the school system. This way, the answer to the
question can be found.
d. The hypotheses formulated are testable, that is, they can be accepted or
rejected. Hypotheses are not proved, they are only determined as true or not. If the
findings conform to the hypotheses, the latter are accepted as true and valid.
e. Equipment and instruments for research are available and can give valid
reliable results.
8. It is significant, important, and relevant to the present time and situation, timely,
and of current interest. This means that the research project must be able to make a
substantial impact upon situations and people it is intended for or addressed to. It must
be able to arouse the interest of the people concerned. If the study is about drug abuse,
it must be able to draw attention of those engaged in the habit and those assigned to
stop it.
9. The results are practical and implementable. If the investigation is about drug
addiction, are the recommendations for its eradication applicable with the expected
effectiveness.
10. It requires original, critical, and reflective thinking to solve it. To be able to apply
these, the research project must be novel, new or original. The study is considered
novel and new if it has not yet been studied before and the data are gathered from new
and original sources. However, the study may be a replication, that is, the study has
already been conducted but in another place, not in the place where it is intended to be
studied again. The purpose of the study replications is to determine if the conditions in
one place are also true in other places so that generalizations of wider application can
be formulated.
11. It can be delimited to suit the resources of the researcher but big or large enough
to be able to give significant, valid, and reliable results and generalizations. The area
and population may be reduced but only to such an extent that the generalizations can
be considered true and useful.
12. It must contribute to the national development goals for the improvement of the
quality of human life. This is the ultimate aim of research, to improve the quality of
human life. Research must improve or show how to improve unsatisfactory conditions.
13. It must contribute to the fund of human knowledge. All the facts and knowledge
that we have is mostly the product of research, any study to be conducted must add a
new bit of knowledge to what we already have.
14. It must show or pave the way for the solution of the problem or problems
intended to be solved. Usually, after an inquiry has been conducted, recommendations
are made for the solution of problems discovered which, if implemented, can solve the
problems.
15. It must not undermine the moral and spiritual values of the people. It must not
advocate the promotion of antisocial values such as drug addiction, cruelty, hatred, and
divisiveness, multiple sex mating, etc. As much as possible it must advocate the
promotion of divine values and those admirable human values such as love, peace,
goodwill, etc.
16. It must not advocate any change in the present order of things by means of
violence but by peaceful means. It must not advocate subversion, revolution, or the like
wrest control of the government or change the form of government. If there is a needed
change, it must be made by any means but the means must be peaceful and legitimate.
17. There must be a return of some kind to the researcher, either one or all of the
following, if the research report is completed:
18. There must be a consideration of the hazards involved, physical, social, or legal.
This author knows of a man who went to the mountain to study the tribe, ignoring the
physical dangers from wild animals and from the tribesmen themselves. While this act is
admirable, the researcher must also consider his personal safety.
Another hazard is social. This occurs when an inquiry happens to encroach upon
socially approved and established social values, norms of conduct, or ethical standards.
The inquiry may draw the ire of the populace and the researcher may receive some kind
of rebuke, censure, criticism, or derision.
REFERENCES:
Aquino, Guadencio V., Essentials of Research and Thesis Writing. Quezon City:
Alemars-Phoenix Publishing House, Inc., 1974
Babble, Earl. The Practice of Social Research. Fourth Edition. Belmont, California:
Wadsworth Publishing Company, Inc. 1986
Treece, Eleonor Walters and James William Treece, Jr. The Elements of Research in
Nursing. Saint Louis: C.V. Mosby Company, Inc., 1973. (Reprinted by Phoenix Press,
Inc.)
Treece, Eleonor Walters and James William Treece, Jr. The Elements of Research in
Nursing. Second Edition. Saint Louis: C.V. Mosby Company, Inc., 1977. (Reprinted by
Phoenix Press, Inc.)
The Title
The title is a major determinant of whether your research paper will be read. It should
draw the reader’s attention and interest and make them want to continue reading.
The title should accurately, completely, and specifically indicate the focus of the paper,
and should contain relevant “keywords.” The best way to structure you title is to look at
your hypothesis and experimental variables.
The thesis writer should be guided by the following of his title. These are also the
characteristics of the title.
1. Generally, the title is formulated before the start of the research. It may be revised by
the researcher later if there is a need to revise.
2. The title must contain the subject matter of the study, the locale of the study, the
population involved, and the period when the data were gathered or will be gathered.
3. It must be broad enough to include all aspects of the subject matter studied or to be
studied. The title must indicate what are to be expected to be found inside the thesis
report.
5. The researcher must avoid the terms “An Analysis of”, “A Study of,” “An Investigation
of,”. All these things are understood to have been done or to be done when a
researcher is conducting his research.
6. If the title contains more than one line, it must be written like an inverted pyramid, all
words in capital letters.
Example of a complete title:
Guidelines in formulating the general problem and the specific subproblems or specific
questions. The following are suggested to guide the researcher in the formulation of his
general as well as his specific subproblems or questions. These are also the
characteristics of specific questions:
1. The general statement of the problem and the specific suubproblems or questions
should be formulated first before conducting the research.
3. Each specific questions must be clear and unequivocal, that is, it has only one
meaning it must not have dual meaning.
4. Each specific question is researchable apart from the other questions, that is,
answers to each specific question can be found even without considering the other
questions.
5. Each specific question must be based upon known facts and phenomena. Besides,
data from such known facts and phenomena must be accessible to make the specific
question researchable.
6. Answers to specific question can be interpreted apart from the answers to other
specific questions.
7. Answers to each specific question must contribute to the development of the whole
research problem or topic.
8. Summing up the answers to all the specific questions will give a complete
development of the entire study.
9. The number of specific questions should be enough to cover the development of the
whole research problem or study.
Before writing down the specific questions, determine first the different aspects of the
research problem to be studied and then for each make one specific question with
subquestions if there is a need to do it. If the research topic is the teaching of
mathematics the different aspects may be the following:
e. Comparison between the perceptions of the teacher and those of the students
concerning the different aspects;
10. Generally, there should be a general statement of the problem and then this
should be broken up into as many subproblems or specific questions as necessary.
Example: This study was conducted to investigate all aspects of the teaching of
mathematics in the senior high school of Province B during the school year 2016-2017
as perceived by the mathematics teachers and students. Specifically, the study
attempted to answer the following questions:
a. How effective are the methods and strategies used by the teachers in teaching
mathematics?
b. How qualified are the teachers handling mathematics in the senior high school
of Province B?
c. How adequate are the instructional as well as the non-instructional facilities for
the teaching of mathematics?
e. Is there any significant difference between the perceptions of the teachers and
those of the students concerning the different aspects in the teaching of
mathematics?
g. What suggestions are offered by the teachers and students to improve the
teaching of mathematics?
Assumptions
Examples:
Implicit (unwritten) assumption: There are certain qualifications that one should
possess before he/she can teach mathematics.
2. Specific question: How adequate are the facilities that a school acquires before
it can offer mathematics as a subject?
Implicit assumption: There are certain required facilities that a school acquires before
it can offer mathematics subject.
Implicit assumption: There are certain methods that are effective in the teaching of
mathematics.
Guidelines in the use of basis assumption. The following are the guidelines in the use of
basic assumption: (By Sugden as cited by Manuel,p.81)
1. You cannot assume the value of your study. Such as argument should have been
made under the section, significance of the study.
2. You cannot assume the reliability of the instruments you propose to use in your
research. Such as rationale and defense should be made under methodology.
3. You cannot assume the validity of basic data. Validity is established under
methodology.
4. You cannot assume that your population is typical. This point is to be made under
methodology.
Hypotheses
Forms of hypotheses
There are two forms of hypotheses. One is in the operational form and the other is in
the null form. The operational form is stated in the affirmative while the null form is
stated in the negative. The operational form states that there is a difference between
two phenomena while the null form states that there is no difference between the two
phenomena. In other words the null form expresses equality between the two
phenomena. This is more commonly used.
3. Hypotheses are usually stated in the null form because testing a null hypothesis is
easier than a hypothesis in the operational form. Testing a hypothesis simply means
gathering data to answer it.
4. Hypotheses are formulated from the specific questions upon which they are based.
Example:
Question: Is there any significant difference between the perceptions of the teachers
and those of the students concerning the different aspects in the teaching of
mathematics?
1. They help the researcher in designing his study: what methods, research
instruments, sampling design, and statistical treatments to be use, what data to be
gather, and etc.
4. They serve as bases for the explanation or discussion about the data gathered.
5. They help or guide the researcher in consolidating his findings and in formulating his
conclusions. Generally, findings and conclusions are answers to the hypotheses or
specific questions raised at the start of the investigation.
REFERENCES:
Aquino, Guadencio V., Essentials of Research and Thesis Writing. Quezon City:
Alemars-Phoenix Publishing House, Inc., 1974
Babble, Earl. The Practice of Social Research. Fourth Edition. Belmont, California:
Wadsworth Publishing Company, Inc. 1986
Treece, Eleonor Walters and James William Treece, Jr. The Elements of Research in
Nursing. Saint Louis: C.V. Mosby Company, Inc., 1973. (Reprinted by Phoenix Press,
Inc.)
Treece, Eleonor Walters and James William Treece, Jr. The Elements of Research in
Nursing. Second Edition. Saint Louis: C.V. Mosby Company, Inc., 1977. (Reprinted by
Phoenix Press, Inc.)
Related literature is composed of discussion of facts and principles to which the present
study deals is related. For instance, if the present study deals with drug addiction,
literature to be reviewed or surveyed should be composed of materials that deal with
drug addiction. These materials are usually printed and found in book, encyclopedias,
professional journals, magazines, newspapers, and other publications.
Related studies, on the hand, are studies, inquiries, or investigations already conducted
to which the present proposed study is related or has some bearing or similarity. They
are usually unpublished materials such as manuscripts, theses, and dissertations.
A survey or review of related literature and studies is very important because such
reviewed literature and studies serve as a foundation of the proposed study. This is
because related literature and studies guide the researcher in pursuing his research
venture. Reviewed literature and studies help or guide the researcher in the following
ways:
1. They help or guide the researcher in searching for or selecting a better research
problem or topic. By reviewing related materials, a replication of a similar problem may
be found better than the problem already chosen. Replication is the study of a research
problem already conducted but in another place.
2. They help the investigator understand his topic for research better. Reviewing related
literature and studies may clarify vague points about his problem.
3. They ensure that there will be no duplication of other studies. There is duplication if
an investigation already made is conducted again in the same locale using practically
the same respondents. This is avoided if a survey of related literature and studies be
made first.
4. They help and guide the researcher in locating more sources of related information.
This is because the bibliography of a study already conducted indicates references
about similar studies.
5. They help and guide the researcher in making his research design especially in
6. They help and guide the researcher in making comparison between his findings with
the findings of other researcher on similar studies with the end in view of formulating
generalizations or principles which are the contributions of the study to the fund of
knowledge.
There are certain characteristics of related materials that make them of true value.
Among these characteristics are:
1. The surveyed materials must be as recent as possible. This is important because of
the rapid social, economic, scientific, and technological changes. Findings several years
ago may be of little value today because of the fast changing life style of the people.
2. Materials reviewed must be objective and unbiased. Some materials are extremely or
subtly one-sided, either political, or religious, etc. comparison with these materials
cannot be made logically and validly. Distorted generalizations may result.
3. Materials surveyed must be relevant to the study. Only materials that have some
bearing or similarity to the research problem at hand should be reviewed.
4. Surveyed materials must have been based upon genuinely original and true facts or
data to make them valid and reliable. There are cases where fictitious data are supplied
just to complete a research report (thesis or dissertation). Of course, this kind of
deception is hard to detect and to prove. Thus, this is a real problem to honest
researchers.
5. Reviewed materials must not be too few nor too many. They must only be sufficient
enough to give insight into the research problem or to indicate the nature of the present
investigation.
The sources of related literature and studies may include the following:
6. Bulletins, circulars and orders emanating from government offices and departments,
especially from the Office of the President of the Philippines and the Department of
Education.
Generally, the sources of related literature and studies are located in the following
places:
The last two are rich in depositories of related materials, particularly unpublished
master’s theses and doctoral dissertation.
REFERENCES:
Aquino, Guadencio V., Essentials of Research and Thesis Writing. Quezon City:
Alemars-Phoenix Publishing House, Inc., 1974
Babble, Earl. The Practice of Social Research. Fourth Edition. Belmont, California:
Wadsworth Publishing Company, Inc. 1986
Treece, Eleonor Walters and James William Treece, Jr. The Elements of Research in
Nursing. Second Edition. Saint Louis: C.V. Mosby Company, Inc., 1977. (Reprinted by
Phoenix Press, Inc.)
Related literature is composed of discussion of facts and principles to which the present
study deals is related. For instance, if the present study deals with drug addiction,
literature to be reviewed or surveyed should be composed of materials that deal with
drug addiction. These materials are usually printed and found in book, encyclopedias,
professional journals, magazines, newspapers, and other publications.
Related studies, on the hand, are studies, inquiries, or investigations already conducted
to which the present proposed study is related or has some bearing or similarity. They
are usually unpublished materials such as manuscripts, theses, and dissertations.
A survey or review of related literature and studies is very important because such
reviewed literature and studies serve as a foundation of the proposed study. This is
because related literature and studies guide the researcher in pursuing his research
venture. Reviewed literature and studies help or guide the researcher in the following
ways:
1. They help or guide the researcher in searching for or selecting a better research
problem or topic. By reviewing related materials, a replication of a similar problem may
be found better than the problem already chosen. Replication is the study of a research
problem already conducted but in another place.
2. They help the investigator understand his topic for research better. Reviewing related
literature and studies may clarify vague points about his problem.
3. They ensure that there will be no duplication of other studies. There is duplication if
an investigation already made is conducted again in the same locale using practically
the same respondents. This is avoided if a survey of related literature and studies be
made first.
4. They help and guide the researcher in locating more sources of related information.
This is because the bibliography of a study already conducted indicates references
about similar studies.
5. They help and guide the researcher in making his research design especially in
6. They help and guide the researcher in making comparison between his findings with
the findings of other researcher on similar studies with the end in view of formulating
generalizations or principles which are the contributions of the study to the fund of
knowledge.
There are certain characteristics of related materials that make them of true value.
Among these characteristics are:
1. The surveyed materials must be as recent as possible. This is important because of
the rapid social, economic, scientific, and technological changes. Findings several years
ago may be of little value today because of the fast changing life style of the people.
2. Materials reviewed must be objective and unbiased. Some materials are extremely or
subtly one-sided, either political, or religious, etc. comparison with these materials
cannot be made logically and validly. Distorted generalizations may result.
3. Materials surveyed must be relevant to the study. Only materials that have some
bearing or similarity to the research problem at hand should be reviewed.
4. Surveyed materials must have been based upon genuinely original and true facts or
data to make them valid and reliable. There are cases where fictitious data are supplied
just to complete a research report (thesis or dissertation). Of course, this kind of
deception is hard to detect and to prove. Thus, this is a real problem to honest
researchers.
5. Reviewed materials must not be too few nor too many. They must only be sufficient
enough to give insight into the research problem or to indicate the nature of the present
investigation.
The sources of related literature and studies may include the following:
6. Bulletins, circulars and orders emanating from government offices and departments,
especially from the Office of the President of the Philippines and the Department of
Education.
Generally, the sources of related literature and studies are located in the following
places:
The last two are rich in depositories of related materials, particularly unpublished
master’s theses and doctoral dissertation.
REFERENCES:
Aquino, Guadencio V., Essentials of Research and Thesis Writing. Quezon City:
Alemars-Phoenix Publishing House, Inc., 1974
Babble, Earl. The Practice of Social Research. Fourth Edition. Belmont, California:
Wadsworth Publishing Company, Inc. 1986
Treece, Eleonor Walters and James William Treece, Jr. The Elements of Research in
Nursing. Second Edition. Saint Louis: C.V. Mosby Company, Inc., 1977. (Reprinted by
Phoenix Press, Inc.)
Generally, the research design is explained in this module. Among those topics included
are the research design which needed to be given some kind of explanations are the
following: Method of Research Used, Method of Collecting Data and Development of
the Research Instrument, Sampling Design and Statistical Treatment.
Method of Research
Example:
Suppose the descriptive method of research was used in the study of the teaching of
mathematics in the senior high school of Province B. briefly the discussion follows:
The descriptive method of research was used in this study. Descriptive method of
research is a fact finding study with adequate and accurate interpretation of the findings.
It describes with emphasis what actually exist such as current conditions, practices,
situations, or any phenomena. Since the present study or investigation was concerned
with the present status of the teaching of mathematics in the senior high school of
Province B, the descriptive method of research was the most appropriate method to
use.
Collection of Data
Data, plural for datum, are a collection of numbers, quantities, facts, or records, used as
bases for drawing conclusion or making inferences. (Good,p.155)
Data are what research is searching for and which are subjected to analysis, statistical
procedures and interpretation so that inferences, principles, or generalizations are
drawn. Data also reveal unsatisfactory conditions that need to be improved. The
application of newly discovered facts and principles to remedy unsatisfactory conditions
becomes the basis of human progress and the improvement of the quality of human life.
1. Primary data. Primary data are those gathered from primary sources. The primary
sources are as follows:
a. Individual persons.
e. Living organisms such as animals, fowls, and lower forms of living organisms.
2. Secondary data. Secondary data are those gathered from secondary sources. The
secondary sources are as follows:
e. All other second-hand sources. Secondary data are verbal (written) data.
These are the certain advantages of primary data over secondary data among which
are: (Bacani, et.al.,p.21)
1. The primary data frequently give detailed definitions of terms and statistical units
used in the survey.
2. The secondary data have usually little or no explanatory notes ad may contain
clerical and typographical mistakes which often arise from transcription of the figures
from the original or primary source.
3. The primary data usually includes a copy of the schedule and a description of the
procedure used in the selection of the type of a sample and in collecting the data. This
gives the user an idea of accuracy, applicability, and limitation of the survey results.
4. The primary data are usually broken down into finer classifications. The secondary
data often omit part of combining categories such as showing barrios instead of sitios,
or municipalities instead of barrios.
1. Secondary data are more convenient to use because they are already condensed
and organized.
Categories of data gathered from respondents. Respondents are those individuals who
are asked or requested by a researcher to supply data or information about his research
problem. The categories of data supplied by respondents are the following:
a. Personal circumstances such as age, sex, height, weight, color of skin and
eyes, color and nature of hair, facts about health, date of birth, place of birth, civil
status, number of children, present address, kind of residence and residence
environment, telephone number, nationality, race, ethnic group, native language
and other language spoken, education and school, intelligence, character and
other psychological characteristics, etc.
b. What they do such as habits ad hobbies, profession or occupation, life style,
plans and aspirations, social or economic status, membership in religious,
professional or civic organizations, activities, practices, and other events in their
lives.
2. Attitudes and Feelings. These are the respondent’s ideas and thoughts about the
research topic, and his personal feelings about the worth of the item being investigated.
This may include the extend of the respondent’s attitude and feelings toward the issues
or state of affairs raised in the research problem. For instance, if a respondent is ask to
give his attitude or reaction towards pornography, he may say, strongly agree to, favors
it; or he merely agrees to, favors or likes it; or he may say that he is not sure of his
opinion, that is, he is uncertain; or he merely disagree to, or disfavors, dislikes, or hates
it; or strongly disagrees to, disfavors, dislikes, or hates it.
3. Judgments. These data include the respondent’s idea or opinion about, or his actual
behavior, in a given situation. This is what the respondents think a thing or situation
should be or what is. In this, there seems to be a standard, and ideal standard that is,
with which things, ideas and situations are compared; how far or how near they are from
the standard. For instance, if a respondent is asked how serious a problem is, he may
answer very serious, serious, slightly serious, not serious or not at all a problem
according to his judgment.
4. Psychomotor skills. These data refer to the manipulative skills of the individual and
his activities that involve his five senses: sight, hearing, taste, smell, and touch. How
skillful does one operate a microscope? How well does he respond to sound? To touch?
In here there is also an element of judgment because the performance of an individual
is usually judged in comparison of or with the performance of an average individual.
5. Results of tests and experiments. The results of tests and experiments are very
important data especially in psychology and in the physical, chemical, and biological
sciences. Much of the progress of mankind is due to the results of tests and
experiments performed in connection with research. The psychological principles that
we are applying today have been the results of extensive testing.
6. All other data gathered from the primary and secondary sources of data.
There are several ways of collecting data among which are the following:
A. Clerical tools
1. The questionnaire method
The choice of the method depends upon some factors such as the nature of problem,
the population or universe under study, the cost of the survey, and the time factor.
Instruments or tools for gathering data in research are of two categories or kinds:
(Treece and Treece, p.49)
2. Clerical tools. Clerical tools are used when the researcher studies people and
gathers data on the feelings, emotions, attitudes and judgment of the subjects. Some
examples of clerical tools are: filed records, histories, case studies, questionnaires, and
interview schedules.
1. The instrument must be valid and reliable. An instrument is valid if it collects data
which are intended for it to collect and long enough to be able to collect adequate
information to complete the study or investigation. It is reliable if it is administered to the
same subject twice without any practice it also gives the same result or measure.
2. It must be based upon the conceptual framework or what the researcher wants
to find out. A conceptual framework is the researcher’s idea or expectation of what a
situation should be but he is not proving his idea or expectation to be true. He is only
finding out if it is true or not.
3. It must gather data suitable for and relevant to the research topic. Foreign data
or extraneous to the study or topic should not be gathered by the instrument. For
instance, if the topic is about the teaching of mathematics, the instrument should gather
data only about the teaching of mathematics and not for the teaching of Science.
4. It must gather data that would test the hypotheses or answer the questions
under investigation. Testing a hypothesis is merely finding out whether it is true or not
based upon the data gathered. If the information gathered reveals that the hypothesis is
true, then it is accepted, otherwise it is rejected. In studies where there are no
expressed hypotheses, but only specific questions are used, the data that should be
gathered are those that would answer the question.
5. It should be free from all kinds of bias. It should not suggest what should be the
replies. Here is an example of a biases question. “Are you using Colgate Toothpaste?
______ If not, what brand of toothpaste are you using?” This is based because the
mere mention of the word “Colgate” is already a suggestion. To remove the bias, the
question should be “What brand of toothpaste are you using?”
7. It must contain clear and definite directions to accomplish it. Poor direction:
“Please accomplish the questionnaire”. The respondents do not exactly know what to do
whether to write his replies in words, in numbers, or in other symbols. Better: This is a
multiple response questionnaire. Please read each question carefully and then put a
check mark before the item or items following which you think will best answer the
question.
REFERENCES:
Aquino, Guadencio V., Essentials of Research and Thesis Writing. Quezon City:
Alemars-Phoenix Publishing House, Inc., 1974
Babble, Earl. The Practice of Social Research. Fourth Edition. Belmont, California:
Wadsworth Publishing Company, Inc. 1986
Good, Carter V. Editor. Dictionary of Education. Second Edition. New York: Barnes and
Noble, Inc.,1960
Treece, Eleonor Walters and James William Treece, Jr. The Elements of Research in
Nursing. Saint Louis: C.V. Mosby Company, Inc., 1973. (Reprinted by Phoenix Press,
Inc.)
Treece, Eleonor Walters and James William Treece, Jr. The Elements of Research in
Nursing. Second Edition. Saint Louis: C.V. Mosby Company, Inc., 1977. (Reprinted by
Phoenix Press, Inc.)
Before the collection of data starts in any research project, the proportion of the
population to be used must have been determined already and the computation of the
sample must have been finished. So, what the researcher must do here is to write about
the complete procedure or method he used in determining his sample. Among the
things that he should explain are:
c. The margin of error and the proportion of the study population used;
d. The type of technique of sampling used whether pure random sampling, systematic
random sampling, stratifies random sampling, cluster sampling or a combination of two
or more techniques;
f. The sample.
The researcher must explain very clearly how he selected his sample. He must be able
to show that his sample is representative of the population by showing that he used the
appropriate technique of sampling. This is very important because if it appears that his
sample is not representative, his findings and conclusions will be faulty and hence, not
valid and reliable.
The kind of statistical treatment depends upon the nature of the problem, especially the
specific problem, and the nature of the data gathered. The explicit hypotheses
particularly determine the kind of statistics to be used.
The role of statistics in research. With the advent of computer age, statistics is now
playing a vital role in research. This is true especially in science and technological
research. What functions do statistics perform in research? Some are the following:
1. Statistical method helps the researcher in making his research design, particularly in
experimental research. Statistical methods are always involved in planning a research
project because in some way statistics directs the researcher how to gather his data.
2. Statistical techniques help the researcher in determining the validity and reliability of
his research instruments. Data gathered with instruments that are not valid and reliable
are almost useless and so the researcher must have to be sure that his instruments are
valid and reliable.
4. Statistical treatments give meaning and interpretation to data. For instance, if the
standard deviation of the class frequency of a group is small, we know that the group is
more or less homogenous but if it is large, the group is more or less heterogeneous.
5. Statistics are used to test the hypotheses. Statistics help the researcher determine
whether his hypotheses are to be accepted or to be rejected.
The Questionnaire
A questionnaire has been defined by Good as a list of planned written questions related
to a particular topic, with space provided for indicating the response to each question,
intended for submission to a number of persons for reply; commonly used in normative
survey studies and in the measurement of attitudes and opinion. (Good,p.435)
1. The questionnaire is easy to construct. The rules and principles of construction are
easy to follow.
4. The respondent’s replies are free. The respondent’s replies are of his own free will
because there is no interview to influence him. This is one way to avoid bias, particularly
the interviewer’s bias.
6. The respondent can fill out the questionnaire at will. Because nobody is pressing him
to answer the questionnaire immediately, the respondent can accomplish the
questionnaire anywhere at any time at his own convenience.
7. The respondents can give more accurate replies. The respondent has time enough to
think reflectively of his replies making them more accurate than the results of interviews
where the respondent is usually pressed for an immediate reply. He also has time to
consult his records if necessary.
1. The questionnaire cannot be used with those who cannot read nor write well,
especially those who are totally illiterate.
2. If many respondents may not return the filled up copies of the questionnaire
purposely or forgetfully, considerable follow ups are necessary. This is true if the returns
are not representative of the group.
3. If a respondent gives wrong information, it cannot be corrected at once.
5. Some questions may be vague and so the respondents may not answer them or if he
does, he may give wrong replies.
6. The number of choices may be so limited that the respondent may be forced to select
responses that are not his actual choices. This is especially true with the yes or no
question.
There are some steps in the preparation of a questionnaire, some of which are the
following:
1. Doing library search. Do some library research among studies similar to yours.
There may be some questionnaires similar to what you want to use. They may serve as
guides in constructing yours.
2. Talking to knowledgeable people. Talk to people who have some knowledge about
the construction of questionnaires. You may be able to get some ideas from them.
5. Editing the questionnaire. After the questionnaire has been finished, show it for
correction and suggestions for improvement to people who are known to posses
adequate knowledge in the construction of questionnaires, especially to your adviser if
you have one.
7. Pretesting the questionnaire. This is called a dry run. This is the process of
measuring the effectiveness, validity, and reliability of the questionnaire, and
determining the clarity of the items, the difficulty of answering the questions, the proper
length of time in answering, ease in tabulating responses, and other problems.
The types of questions asked in questionnaire for survey purpose are:
A. According to form:
1. The free-answer type. This is also called the open form, open-ended, subjective,
unrestricted, essay, and unguided response type. The respondent answers the question
in his own words and in his own way.
2. The guided response type. This is also called the closed form or restricted type.
The respondent is guided in making his reply. There are two kinds of this type: recall
and recognition types;
Age : ______
Sex : ______
2.2 Recognition types. The possible responses are given and respondent
selects his answer. There are three type: dichotomous, multiple choice, and
multiple response.
2.2.1. Dichotomous. These are only two options and one is selected.
2.2.2. Multiple choices. Only one answer is chosen from those given as
options.
____ It is cheap
____ It is imported
Do you agree to have only one day election, set for local and national elective officials?
____ Agree
____ Disagree
d. Degree of judgment
____ Serious
____ Adequate
____ Inadequate
e. Understanding
f. Reasoning
It had been said before that a questionnaire is a set of planned questions which, when
answered properly, would supply the needed data for a research problem or topic. The
following are useful guidelines in the construction of questions for a questionnaire:
1. Make all directions clear and unequivocal. As much as possible make all
directions clear, definite, unequivocal and brief. There should also be a direction
for every type of questions. See to it that the respondent knows exactly what to
do.
Better : Choose the items or options that would best answer the
5. Objectify the responses. This is for the standardization of responses and easier
tabulation.
_____ It is fragrant.
_____ It is cheap.
6. Relate all questions to the topic under study. All questions should gather data
relevant to the study. If the study is about the teaching of mathematics, all questions
should gather data that have something to do with the teaching of mathematics. If the
study is about the teaching of science, all questions should gather data that have
something to do with the teaching of science.
b. Questions that deal with items that are logically and usually placed together
under a big category should be grouped together.
Example of limited number of response categories: Do you agree that the presidential
form of government is better than the parliamentary form?
_____ Agree
_____ Disagree
10. Word carefully or avoid questions that deal with confidential or embarrassing
information.
Example: Suppose a woman becomes unfaithful to her husband and you want to find
the reasons why she became unfaithful to her husband. This is in connection with your
study of family relations.
Poor question: Why did you become unfaithful to your husband? (This is already telling
her that she is unfaithful and this will surely embarrass her).
Better: What, in your own opinion, are the reasons why wives sometimes fall in love with
men other than their own husbands? (Supply all possible reasons and she will choose
those which she experienced).
11. Explain and illustrate difficult questions. Difficult questions such as those
employing some unfamiliar technical terms should be made clearer by adding
explanations and or illustrations.
Example
13. Make as many questions as would supply adequate information for the study.
The study is only as complete as the completeness of the data used. If some important
data are missing, the worth of the inquiry is very much reduced particularly its accuracy
and validity.
16. Make the respondent anonymous. This is to make them give information more
freely and more accurately. Respondents are reluctant and even refuse to give
information about confidential and or embarrassing matters if they are not made
anonymous.
1. All-or-none response. If all or most of the answers are in same direction, such as all
“yes” or all ”no”, there is something wrong with the question. An example is “Are you in
favor of good health?” Naturally the answer is “yes”.
4. High proportion of “don’t know” or “don’t recall”. These responses indicate that
the items are improperly stated or inappropriate. This is why pretesting is necessary to
discover these defects.
Aquino, Guadencio V., Essentials of Research and Thesis Writing. Quezon City:
Alemars-Phoenix Publishing House, Inc., 1974
Babble, Earl. The Practice of Social Research. Fourth Edition. Belmont, California:
Wadsworth Publishing Company, Inc. 1986
Good, Carter V. Editor. Dictionary of Education. Second Edition. New York: Barnes and
Noble, Inc.,1960
Treece, Eleonor Walters and James William Treece, Jr. The Elements of Research in
Nursing. Saint Louis: C.V. Mosby Company, Inc., 1973. (Reprinted by Phoenix Press,
Inc.)
Treece, Eleonor Walters and James William Treece, Jr. The Elements of Research in
Nursing. Second Edition. Saint Louis: C.V. Mosby Company, Inc., 1977. (Reprinted by
Phoenix Press, Inc.)
d. The reason why the respondent should answer the questionnaire and giving
importance to the respondent;
The letter should be written as courteously and cordially as possible making it very
personal and neatly printed or typed bearing the actual signature of the researcher. The
sponsoring or endorsing person should be selected on the basis of his influence upon
the respondents.
Interview
1. The researcher may approach and interview knowledgeable people to enable him to
gain insight into his problem, the variables he is going to use, the formulation of his
specific questions and hypotheses, the statistical methods he is going to utilize, etc.
2. The researcher may also interview knowledgeable people about the proper
construction and validation of a questionnaire, or who can make any contribution to the
enrichment of his study.
3. In cases when the subject of the study is a person with some signs of abnormality,
the interviewer may wish to gain information from the overt, oral, physical, and
emotional reactions of the subject towards certain questions to be used for a possible
remedy of the abnormality.
4. The researcher may also use the interview as the principal tool in gathering data for
his study or just to supplement data collected by other techniques.
1. It yields more and valid information. The respondents are usually pressed for an
answer to a question which the interviewer can validate at once. He can probe into the
veracity of the reply immediately. Hence, there is a higher proportion of usable returns.
2. The interview can be used with all kinds of people, whether literate or illiterate, rich or
poor, laborer or capitalist, etc.
3. The interviewer can always clarify points or question which are vague to the
interviewee.
4. Only the interviewee respondent can make replies to questions of the interviewer,
unlike in the case of a questionnaire in which filling up a questionnaire may be
delegated to another person or the respondent may be aided by another person in
making replies.
5. The interviewer can observe the nonverbal reactions or behavior of the respondent
which may reveal rich pertinent information. These are called subliminal cues which are
“behavioral or attitudes that are not specifically stated but are covertly displayed. The
interviewer must be skillful in reading cues. He may bring such subliminal cues to the
attention of the respondent to check if his suspected recognition is correct and to
alleviate tension. Interpretations and predictions based upon nonverbal cues must be
accurate; otherwise they will tend to be biased subjective data.
6. Greater complex questions can be asked with the interviewer around to explain
things greater complex data which are vital to the study can be acquired.
7. There is flexibility. The interviewer can affect a modification of the interview or any
question if there is a need so that the desired information can be gathered.
3. The responses may be inaccurate if the interviewee has no time to consult hid
records especially if the needed data involve numerals.
5. It is inconvenient for both the interviewer and the interviewee in terms of time and
sometimes in terms of place. The interviewer has to travel distances.
6. There is no anonymity and so the interviewee may withhold some confidential but
vital information, especially if the information may possibly invite trouble. This is true if
the information is about the morality of an individual or the commission of graft and
corruption.
4. Focused interview. This is also called depth interview. This is similar to the
nonstandardized interview in which no required questions should be asked by the
interviewer. The researcher asks a series of questions based on his previous
understanding and insight of the situation. Specific attention is given to specific topics or
ideas.
4. According to the roles assumed by the interviewer and the interviewee in relation to
the socio-psychological process of interaction:
REFERENCES:
Aquino, Guadencio V., Essentials of Research and Thesis Writing. Quezon City:
Alemars-Phoenix Publishing House, Inc., 1974
Babble, Earl. The Practice of Social Research. Fourth Edition. Belmont, California:
Wadsworth Publishing Company, Inc. 1986
Good, Carter V. Editor. Dictionary of Education. Second Edition. New York: Barnes and
Noble, Inc.,1960
Treece, Eleonor Walters and James William Treece, Jr. The Elements of Research in
Nursing. Saint Louis: C.V. Mosby Company, Inc., 1973. (Reprinted by Phoenix Press,
Inc.)
Treece, Eleonor Walters and James William Treece, Jr. The Elements of Research in
Nursing. Second Edition. Saint Louis: C.V. Mosby Company, Inc., 1977. (Reprinted by
Phoenix Press, Inc.)