Checkpoint: Greetings From Sicily
Checkpoint: Greetings From Sicily
example, Yrjolä writes: "In the Classical [Sicilian], we encounter the following basic
positions-types: Boleslavsky, Dragon, Velimirovic, Sozin, Rauzer without doubled
f-pawns and Rauzer with doubled f-pawns. This is also the order they are introduced
in this book." Yrjolä continues with: "In every section there is a strategic introduction
to that position-type before the theoretical lines are discussed in detail. The lines are
organized around base games, which usually represent the main line in this book. The
main lines do not always coincide with those accepted by theory as the principal
variation, but are those that I regard as important and playable. For example, the main
line I have selected against the Velimirovic [Attack] is the one thing that is doing best
in practice, but is not the most popular by any means."
I fully support this way of organizing the material, since it makes it easier for the
student to understand the material if first there is a general discussion about typical
plans, what to look out for, both as Black and White, and then to study the theory on
top of this. For example, in Chapter 2, The Boleslavsky Position-Type, the author first
discusses the two most common pawn structures insofar as which squares are
important for either side and which plans usually are associated with the individual
pawn structures. Then he moves on to cover Typical Methods for White, which
according to the book is "Occupy the d5-square (sometimes f5)", "Attack on the
queenside with the pawns", "Play on the light squares", "Manoeuvre the knight from
f3 to e3", "Advance the f-pawn", "Keep the pawn-formation solid and watertight".
After that the Typical Methods for Black are discussed, before we move on to the
theory itself.
In general the author manages to cover the typical plans quite well, but unlike
Aagaard, he doesn't give many practical examples to support his introduction, so the
student has to find the examples in the theory section by him- or herself, which is not
necessarily bad, just different.
Moving on to the theory, I have found the theoretical coverage to be quite good
overall, a good selection of lines, not necessarily main lines, but lines that are easily
memorized and that do not require an enormous amount of theoretical knowledge. In
addition, Yrjolä presents us with quite a bit of his own analysis and new ideas
compared to existing theory. This always pleases me, because I know that the author
wants to give us something that we can't get somewhere else.
When I first browsed through the book, chapter 3, The Dragon Position-Type, struck
me as quite odd, because not only does he cover non-Dragon lines where Black
develops his Bishop to g7, he also covers lines that are regular Dragon lines, such as 6
g3 g6, which is the main line in the fianchetto line of the Dragon Variation. But after 6
g3, there isn't really much better for Black than to enter these lines, therefore Yrjolä
does the correct but brave thing: to cover these Dragon lines. Many authors would
have stuck to a purely Classical Sicilian approach, and would have suggested an
inferior choice for Black in order not to extend themselves by offering the best
possible, but more complicated, solution to the reader.
On top of the g3-lines, he also introduced me to a couple of lines which I have never
seen before: 6 Be2 Nxd4 7 Qxd4 g6 and 6 f3 Nxd4 7 Qxd4 g6, both of which gets a
bit of coverage, so the reader may be able to use the lines as surprise weapons.
In general, when reading the book and studying his recommendations, you really feel
the author's sincerity and his firm belief that the recommended lines will serve you
well. In repertoire books you often see those outrageous claims by the authors that
White (or Black) is busted in every line; not so with Yrjolä, who manages to keep his
head clear, being objective while guiding us through the Classical Sicilian jungle.
Overall, I found this book very satisfying and trustworthy, and so therefore I have no
problem recommending this book to anybody with interest in the Sicilian, both as
White and Black.
My assessment of this book:
Order Easy Guide to the Classical Sicilian
by Jouni Yrjolä
It's of course of interest to find out how he works. Burgess gives us a peek in the
introduction under the heading "How This Book was Written":
"Every time I write an opening book, it seems necessary to reinvent the writing
process to cope with the constantly mushrooming amount of data, and to make best
use of all the available electronic tools. My first step this time was to set Junior 6 to
work, blunderchecking the main source data (annotated games from Mega Database
2000, ChessBase Magazine 73 onwards and
two correspondence databases, and all games from Informator and TWIC 266
onwards). I gave it enough time to analyse 2-3 million positions at each point. This
saved a lot of time later, as it helped identify possible improvements and holes in
published analysis (and it's amazing how many there were, even in recent games
annotated by strong players, who have no excuse not to have checked their analysis
properly). The bulk of the writing work was done inside ChessBase. I made extensive
use of ChessBase 7's trees: in particular, by making a tree from the work I had done so
far, I could see with one key press whether a given position was already discussed
anywhere in the material so far written. This was a great help in tracking down
transpositions. A similar process made it possible to determine quickly whether a
position was discussed anywhere in the source data. I was assisted by several
analytical engines (in addition to Junior): Fritz 6 (background analysis), Hiarcs 7.32
and Crafty 17.11 (blunderchecks of the whole book), and the new tactical monster
Goliath Light (for cracking tough positions). Using different engines to check the
work at different stages should lessen the effects of certain engines being weak in
some types of position. Of course, human judgement (rightly or wrongly!) had the
final say in all matters. I used BookUp's backsolving feature to help determine the
assessment symbols that, where possible, are given where a transposition is indicated.
These assessment symbols should be taken with a pinch of salt, since they are often
based on a minimax of the assessments of several other variations." (My sincere
thanks to Graham Burgess for e-mailing me this piece, so I didn't have to re-type the
whole thing!)
I find the above very interesting, and I must add that his intelligent use of computers
does cut down on the work that would otherwise have taken many, many hours.
Having written three books myself, and only used computers in a very limited fashion
on the analytical side, I can safely say that many analytical mistakes are avoided when
working as Burgess does. However, I can also say that as a chessplayer your strength
only truly increases when you analyse by yourself (even if aided by a computer).
But back to the book. There is a total of 10 chapters of theoretical coverage. These
chapters are mainly theory and only a few explanations of the typical ideas, which
must be extracted by the reader him- or herself by studying the presented material.
This is quite demanding, particularly if you are not a very strong player, and therefore
his book is best for players who have reached a certain level. But again, neither the
Taimanov nor the Paulsen are really easy to understand, and therefore really only
should be played if you can crunch the strategic ideas behind this openings yourself.
With everything checked and re-checked by various computer programs, I have had a
difficult time finding anything that looked wrong in one way or the other, but a few
interesting things have come up.
On page 88 there is coverage of an idea I looked at in the April 2000 Checkpoint. It is
Ponomariov's sharp line: 1 e4 c5 2 Nf3 e6 3 d4 cxd4 4 Nxd4 Nc6 5 Nc3 Qc7 6 Ndb5
Qb8 7 Be3 a6 (Burgess thinks that 7...Nf6 which transposes to a Scheveningen after
7...Nf6 8 f4 d6 9 Qf3 Be7 10 Bd3 0-0 11 0-0 a6 12 Nd4 Qc7 is the safest response to 7
Be3) 8 Bb6!? axb5 9 Nxb5 (See Diagram)
17...bxa4, which pretty much looks like Black has abandoned his queenside, but it is
surprisingly difficult for White to take advantage of it, e.g.: 18 Rxa4 Qxc2 19 Ra5 0-0
or 18 c3 Rb8 19 Rfb1 Qc6 or 18 Bxa6 Rb8, picking up either White's b- or c-pawn,
but in each case Black doesn't appear to be worse) 18 g3 Qc5 (18...Qc6 is less forcing;
keeping the Queens on appears to be in Black's interest, at least for now) 19 Qxc5
Rxc5 20 f3 Rb8 21 axb5 axb5 22 Ra5, and White already has a solid edge in the
endgame since the black b-pawn is more or less fixed on a light square, and the Rook
on c5 is quite passive, defending the weak b-pawn. The endgame was later won by
White.
The above things are minor, but could easily have been covered more in-depth. Of
course, every author has to draw a line somewhere, and while I would have preferred
to show the most recent example in a particular line, Burgess chose to show an
example by the inventor of the system.
I didn't find any errors, but Burgess felt compelled to point one out himself: on page
21, after 1 e4 c5 2 Nf3 e6 3 d4 cxd4 4 Nxd4 Nc6 5 Nb5 d6 6 Bf4 e5 7 Be3 Nf6 8 Bg5
a6, he fails to mention that 9 N5c3 transposes to Line F2, which makes one of his
comments 'appropriate', but this is a very small thing which easily can be forgiven.
Before I finish this review, I must compliment Burgess on his implementation of
putting transpositional lines in italics, which leads the student to material somewhere
else in the book. In an opening such as this, where transpositions are found
everywhere, this is a very important tool.
The Taimanov Sicilian has the best coverage of a line that is sure to gain popularity,
given that Anand now is playing it regularly with solid results. The presentation is a
bit dry without many verbal explanations, but at the same time it's very in-depth with
loads of improvements over existing theory. The material is well-organised and for the
serious student of opening theory, there is probably no way around this book, while if
you have a particular interest in this opening with either colour, this is a must buy.
My assessment of this book:
Order The Taimanov Sicilian
by Graham Burgess
Plaskett knows that Black or White can improve in certain lines, but he never tells us
why. In short, it is disappointing.
Therefore this book should merely be considered a selection of interesting games
featuring the Sicilian Grand Prix Attack and nothing more. While Plaskett's
run-through of the material and lightweight, but often amusing, annotations can be
entertaining, I doubt that most players will get much benefit from this book. Therefore
people with a specific interest in this opening can consider buying this book, but it is
by no means an essential or a must-buy. Better books have been written on this
opening.
My assessment of this book:
Order Sicilian Grand Prix Attack
by Jim Plaskett
The Ratings
— Not a particularly good book, but perhaps useful for some readers.
— A useful book.
[The Chess Cafe Home Page] [Book Reviews] [Bulletin Board] [Columnists]
[Endgame Studies] [The Ninth File] [The Skittles Room] [Archives]
[Links] [Online Bookstore] [About The Chess Cafe] [Contact Us]