Globalisation and Privatisation
Globalisation and Privatisation
LIBERALISATION
Structure
29.0 Objectives
29.1 Introduction
29.2 Globalisation: Meaning and Approaches
29.2.1 Meaning
29.2.2 Characteristics
29.2.3 Approaches
29.3 Globalisation and World Systems
29.3.1 The World Systems: Capitalist, Socialist and Mixed Economy
29.3.2 Transformation of the World Systems under Globalisation
29.3.3 Regionalisation of Trade and Investment Flows
29.4 Liberalisation
29.4.1 Meaning
29.4.2 Shift from State to Market
29.4.3 Facets of Liberalisation
29.5 Globalisation, Nation-State and Sovereignty
29.5.1 Shifting Conceptlon of the Natton-State and Sovereignty
29.6 Impact of Globalisation
29.6.1 Economic
29.6.2 Political
29.6.3 Cultural
29.7 Response of the Indian State\
29.7.1 Measures towards ~lobalisation
29.8 Debate on Liberalisation and Globalisation in India
29.8.1 Growth of the Economy
29.8.2 External Control
29.8.3 Impact on Unemployment and Poverty
29.8.4 Inequaltty between Rich and Poor States
29.8.5 Basic Industries and Infrastructure
29.8.6 Investment in Social Sectors
29.9 Let Us Sum Up
29.10 Some Useful Books
29.11 Answers to Check Your Progress ~ x e r c i s e s
29.0 OBJECTIVES
This unit is intended to acquaint you with a major development of our times
called globalisation and how the policy of liberalisation is integrally bound
with it. After going through this unit you will be able to: Content Digitized by eGyanKosh, IGNOU
1 l-l,,,c,,,4 A
, m-,-Pa;otn th- +~n,-l~nt -
n .
x~~ r n r r l c mlr.Lnl;nnt;n+..
Context or Indian State
Distinguish globalisation from World Systems;
Understand contemporary forms of dominance;
Grasp the reasons for and forms of the increased significance of the market;
Mark the changing role of the nation-state under globalisation;
Assess the impact of globalisation; ahd
Take into account and estimate the response of India to globalisation.
29.1 INTRODUCTION
Modem civilisation has brought profound changes in the productive capacities
of men and women, in their social relations and institutions i d the way
they have thought of themselves and the world around them. However, these
transfonnations were primarily bounded by what came to be called as the
nation-state. There were some processes that went beyond the confines of
the nation-state such as trade; expansion of capital; growth of knowledge;
spread of ideologies; affiliation to religion and beliefs; spread of culture, arts,
sports and even the rise of certain international institutions but the nation-
state remained the final court of appeal. However, the last three decades
have witnessed certain profound changes in this configuration resulting in new
and larger networks of exchange; great movement of peoples, goods and
information; transnational social and economic interaction and increasing flows
of trade, investment and culture. New economic, political and cultural institutions
have arisen. These changes have circumscribed the place and role of the
nation-state in a profound way. Increasingly our lives today are intimately
shaped by developments beyond the confines of the nation-state. Changes
in technology and information have radically altered the hitherto familiar
notions of space and time. The relationship between culture, economics and
politics is being redefined through rapid exchange of information, ideas and
knowledge. These widespread changes are attempted to be captured by the
term globalisation.
Globalists argue that there has been rapid forging of global bonds as
expressed in international trade and investment and they have superseded
and supplanted the national economy. Traditionalists, however, do not think
that the category of national economy has been supplanted by globalisation.
The transformationalists argue that although new forces of intense
interdependence and integration inform the world we are not into a single
system as yet. They feel that there is the disintegration of local and national
economies and the emergence of more mixed, interdependent and highly
uneven economies which cannot be encompassed within the fold of a single Content Digitized by eGyanKosh, IGNOU
clrctpm
Context o f I n d i a n State In the globalising world that is underway capitalism definitely holds its sway.
There is also no doubt that the present version of globalisation is a triumph
of the erstwhile capitalist system worldwide. Analysts, however, are not
agreed on :
to what extent we can characterise the global system as a new phase
of capitalism,
the specific nature of class relations under globalisation and the class blocs
that ensue therefrom, and
the relation of the market to class struggle
29.3.3 Regionalisation of Trade and Investment Flows
Recent studies indicate that while trade and oversees investment has grown
the proportion of trade to gross domestic product (GDP) has remained
steady since World War I, the pattern of domestic consumption of the
produce, to the extent possible, has not seen major change. Besides, although
there is growth in foreign direct investment (FDI) since 1980, FDI formed
only 5.2 per cent of the world's capital formation. Resources to finance
investment continue to be primarily domestic.
Even today, the international economy is characterised by the development
of regional trading and investment blocs. The most significant configurations
are USA or North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), The European
Union countries and Japan. They accounted for % of the world's GDP in
late 1990's and in 1996, 66 per cent of world trade flows although they
account for 15 per cent of the World's population. A vast section of the
underdeveloped world is out of this process. Further these three big economies
were quite closed in terms of trade interdependence and investment integration
in 1990's. When we look beyond these blocs there is little North-South
trade as yet. The manufactured imports of the Organisation for Economic
Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries in 1992 was not more
than 2.3 per a cent of the GDP of these countries.
In fact if there .is a trend visible; it is the thickening network of trade
participation within the core, the most developed countries. National economies
continue to be primary players on the scene. Between 1991 and 1996 the
USA, EU and Japan acc~untedfor 60 per cent of the world flows of
FDI.
Often the FDI flows are away from the periphery into the core of the
system. Globalisation provides the mechanisms and the rationale for agents
in the periphej to plough their investment in the developed world.
While the regional focus of the economy is inMct, there is at the same
time an attempt to forge agreements on a wider sphere of economic
exchange. They lay down codes governing these exchanges and attempt to
keep conflicts within control. The most important of these agreements was
the one to constitute the World Trade Organisation (WTO) in 1995, which
has become a major pillar of globalisation. A whole range of items which
were earlier part of the national decision are brought before the WTO, such
as agriculture and related activities, trade related investment measures (TRIMS),
trade related intellectual property rights(TRIPS), trade in services and movement
Content Digitized by eGyanKosh, IGNOU of -ns, the prevention of foreign compebtion through duties and quantitative
restrictions such as quotas, exchange controls and regulation. These agreements
do not favour subsidies. Market mechanisms are supposed to determine Globalisation and
Liberalisation
optimum pursuits.
In relation to the understanding of the world systems, we can note the
following changes under conditions of globalisation:
a) There is clearly more intense integration of the economy at the regional
level in the developed world. The national economy still holds its ground.
b) The developed world has marked the code, rules and regulations for the *
2 9.4 LIBERALISATION
In the 1980's there was a strong shift away from the State to the market
in the allocation of resources in large parts of the world. It was accompanied
by the information and communication revolution which favoured the market.
This shiil led to widespread deregulation of the economy and measures to
reduce taxes and government expenditure.
Disagre ments on the changed role of the nation state apart, there is no
7
disagreement that they function today in highly altered conditions. Nation-
states are increasingly perceived as resources to be employed in negotiations
with transnational and international agencies and to keep sub-state actors
in control. In such an understanding sovereignty becomes a bargaining chip
in multilateral and transnational negotiations. This reconceptualisation of the
role of the state allows room for its continued salience in spite of the
profound shift of power to systems of regional and global governance.
Content Digitized by eGyanKosh, IGNOU
L There are a host of issues today where the ability of the state to govern
Context o f Indian State
be easily tied to the jurisdiction of individual nation-states. Such problems
as environmental pollution, depletion of the ozone layer are simply beyond
the control of individual states. No state today can monitor for long and
effectively cross border communication. Further globalisation has reinforced
such occupations as drug trade enormously. In 1990's the estimated annual
illicit drug turnover was over 400 billion US dollars equal to the gross
national product of India in 1998.
................................................................................................................
' .,JJr$jke in most of the other countries which set on reforms much earlier
1ndian liberalisation has been around for less than a decade. It makes
assessment of trends and tendencies less accurate. The debate on liberalisation
in India has squared around issues that have been central to the nationalist
agenda in India. It is not entwined in the kind of ideological debates that
Content Digitized by eGyanKosh, IGNOU
marked the liberalising policies in the W s t , particularly Great Britain.
T :harnl:nnt:r\- :n TnA:n hnn .r-mnAl.r hnnn n h n l l n m m n A h;thnr)rr &am thn
Globalisation and
nationalist and Marxist perspectives and not h m alternative liberal-democratic Liberalisation
pers~ectivesas in the West.
Given the fact that the political centre, from the right to the left, has not
opposed liberalisation it enjoys widespread political consensus in India at
present. Except the communist parties and the Rashrtiya Swayam Sevak
Sangh (R.S.S.) and some of its affiliates, all the other major political parties
in India have extended their support to the liberalising measures. Anyway,
they have not been actively opposed to most of these measures. This
consensus, however, is highly precarious. The debate on the following issues
shows that this consensus cannot be taken for granted for long.
29.8.1' Growth of the Economy -
Although growth of the economy, both quantitative and qualitative, alone
cannot be the rationale for liberalisation, in a developing society like India
it cannot but be of central importance. Besides, although growth by itself
may not meet the other desirable objectives growth is absolutely central to
pursue the? Further we cannot gainsay that in the absence of liberalisation,
the trends in the economy prior to its adoption would have persisted:
f) India's compound rate of growth in the second half of 1980's was 5.8
per annum. The average rate for 1992-98 comes to 6.5 per cent per
annum. Industrial growth for the period 6as been 8.1 per cent and it
is slightly higher than 7.94 per cent that prevailed in the second half of
1980's.The growth of the industry, however, has been very unsteady. The
rate of industrial growth reached a high of 12.8 per cent in 1995-1996
but during 1996-1999 it has been low and unsteady.
ii) The fiscal deficit in the reform period has remained 5.7 per cent as
compared to 8.8 per cent of GDP in the second half of 1980's.
iii] Inflation has been on the decline during the reform period. However, the
growth of consumer index relative to the wholesale shows that food prices
and other goods of mass consumption are increasing at a faster pace
affecting the weaker sections.
iv) India has generally lagged behind in R&D effort."However, ever since
India embraced the path of liberalisation and globalisation its spending in
R&D has fallen. India spent 0.96 per cent of its GDP on R&D in 1988
which came down to 0.8% in 1999. The corresponding amount is 2-
3% of the GDP for developed countries.
v) There has been an unprecedented rise in mergers and acquisitions in the
Irpdian corporate sector after liberalisation.
fbms to make their investment
vi) After liberalisation there is more flexibility for
decisions and in choosing plant capacities. Unprecedented restructuring of
the Indian industry to meet the challenges of the global market has taken
place during the last one decade. Dilution of the MRTP act has removed
many restrictions on' corporate investments and growth.
29.8.2 External Control
The growth of the economy has definitely been favourable so far. At the
same time Indian economy has clearly tended towards monopolies and
towards integration with the global economy. In this context following trends
.;2 \risible: Content Digitized by eGyanKosh, IGNOU
Context of Indian State
9 Propotion of trade to GNP has gone up steadily from 14.1 per cent
in 1990-91 to 18.2 per cent in 1998-1999. India's economy has become
increasingly interdependent on the global economy.
n The remittances of Indians abroad has been to,the tune of 2.5 per cent
of GDP during the libearlising decade compared to just 1 per cent in
the late 1980's. In fact just prior to liberalisation these remittances were
declining. Indians are one of the major contenders in the global labour
flows today.
iiii The FDI flow to India in 1991 was $200 million while US$ 14.6 billion
worth of FDI was approved in 1997 although the actual inflow was
just $3.2 billion. Even this amount was a major advance compared
to the situation prior to liberalisation. However, out of the estimated $684
billion FDI flow worldwide in 1994, India's share was a pittance. Besides
most of the FDI flow in India so far has been directed towards the
non-manufacturing sector and for acquisition of already existing units.
iv) Liberalisation ha.$ facilitated Indian companies raising resources in western
stock exchanges. It was 2.5 per cent of the GDP during the period
1996-97 to 1998-1999.
v) MNCs have taken advantage of the new rules to increase their stake
in their existing affiliates in India. However, the thrust is still to produce
for the Indian Market. Little export-oriented FDI has hitherto come to
India.
vi) External debt has become much more manageable after embracing the
liberalising measures. A healthy foreign exchange reserve has been built
up of about U S 3 5 billions in 2000.
viii India has liberlised its trade with South Asia at a faster pace. All
quantitative restrictions have been removed on imports of 2300 items
from SAARC countries. However, given the volume of trade flows of
South Asian countries, this regional liberalisation will not make much of
a difference in the near future.
viii) Changes in Foreign Exchange Regulation Act have removed shareholding
and business restrictions. Restrictions on income repatriation have been
removed. Similarly policies related to foreign technology purchases and
licensing have been liberalised.
/ /
30.0 OBJTECTIVES
Much of the recent political debate in India has been over the issue of
secularism, from passionate defence of a secular way of life and politics,
the arguments range all the way to a complete denouncement of secular
ideals and politics. In a sense this debate is today at the heart of Indian
politics. After going through this unit, you should be able to:
Understand the meaning and historical significance of secularism;
ldentify the challenges to secularism; and
Formulate a strategy to cope with these threats.
30.1 INTRODUCTION
Secularism, along with a commitment to the ideals of democracy, equality
and freedom were some of the fundamental principles that inspired a large
section of our people to fight against British colonialism. After independence,
these values were enshrined in the Constitution, thus enjoining the state to
uphold these principles. When we look at our society closely we notice
a steady devaluation of these ideals, challenged as they are by various social,
political and economic developments. For our heterogeneous society secularism
is undoubtedly the most cherished principle. However, it is this that is
being severely challenged by communal forces. The battle lines are clearly
drawn between those who stand for a democratic society and those for
whom democracy is dispensable. Secularism is a part of the commitment
Content Digitized by eGyanKosh, IGNOU
to democracy and hence worth defending and fighting for.
Context of Indian State
30.2 SECULAVSM: MEANING AND DEFINITION
We will begin this unit by attempting to understand the meaning of secularism.
In the west, secularism was part of a whole range of new ideas and
institutions that marked the end of the feudal order and the emergence of
a sovereign modem nation-state with new forms of economic organisation.
Its clearly western, and more specifically Christian orign, need not however
limit its application to other cultures. Modem western secularism was the
consequence of the search for a way out of religious wars (often between
Christians of various persuasions) and the need to separate the domain of
the state from that of the Church. Secularism has become essential for
modem democratic nation-states to ensure a strong sense of identification
with the polity based on a common sense of identity, where being a citizen
takes precedence over all other identities like family, race, class and religion.
The word secularism was coined by George Jacob Holyoake in the middle
of the nineteenth century based on the Latin word seculum. Apart from
implying a separation of the Church from the state, it also suggests freedom
to the individual. The Enlightenment in Europe heralded a new era where
Reason rather than religion, became the guiding factor for all aspects of
human life. Secular concerns, it came to be argued, are of this world, and
religion which is concerned with the unknown world was to be kept away
from this. However, this did not necessarily imply a hostile relationship
between the two, only that both are exclusive. In sharp contrast with this
position is the one that sees religion and secularism as being hndamentally
opposed to one another, in the sense that the continued presence of religion
in a society indicates its backwardness, and that ultimately, human progress
and prosperity, and the creation of a truly egalitarian society is possible only
in the absence of religion. In India, secularism is popularly understood as
the best philosophy that would enable people belonging to diverse religious
backgrounds to live together in a harmonious manner, and create a state
that would accord the same degree of respect and freedom to all religions.
Check Your Progress Exercise 1
Note: i) Use the space given below for your answers.
--- ii) Check your answers with the model answers given at the end
of the unit.
1) Why is secularism essential for a modem nation-state?
2) Who coined the, term secularism and what does it generally imply?
It was to avert such disasters that the Indian state steered clear of the
practice of creating separate electorates based on religion, of reserving
constituencies and jobs for religious communitie$ reserving jobs on the basis
of religion and organizing the states of the Indian Union on the basis of
religion. Thus religion comes to be excluded from state institutions in order
to inhibit communal conflict and prevent the repetition of a Partition-like
scenario.
With the same guiding principles in mind, religion was included as a guideline
in matters of cultural import. The most outstanding of these examples is of
course the granting of separate rights to minority religious communities to
enable them to live with dignity, it was recognised that insistence on an
absolutely uniform charter of rights was not desirable nor was it necessary
for national integration. Thus secularism was adopted in India not only to
promote intercodunal solidarity but also to protect the structure of ordinary
life in India. It is in this light that we should see the Indian state's attempts
to make polygamy or child marriage illegal or to grant entry rights for Dalits
b
to Hindu temples. Critics of Indian secularism often denounce the Indian
arrangement for intervention in Hinduism and some of its oppressive
social practices on the *grounds that such actions of the state go against
P
the norms of a truly secular state, or on the grounds that such intervention
in Hindu social practices must be matched with similar interventions in the
social practices of other communities. The protection of the rights of
socioreligious groups is also interpreted as a departure from true secular
practice which the critics argue ought to be grounded in individuals.
I
fiom religion but would address itself to matters rising out of religious
c o n t e x t o f I n d i a n State
concerns when the need arises. However, the cardinal rule would be that
the considerations for both keeping away and for interfering would always
be non-sectarian. The problem with the Indian state's practice of secularism
has been that-it has increasingly been acting out of sectarian interests.
Donald Eugene Smith in his classic study titled "India as a Secular State"
defines a secular state as "that which guarantees individual and corporate
fi-eedom of religion, deals with the individual as a citizen irrespective of his\her
religion, is not constituionally ~ 0 ~ e C t etodparticular religion, nor seeks either
to promote or interfere with religion." It is interesting to note that the term
"secular" did not originally feature in the Indian Constitution, although K.T.
Shah, a member of the Constituent Assembly tried on two occasions to
introduce the term. It was much later, as a part of the forty second
amendment in 1976, that the word secular was incorporated into the
Preamble of the Indian Constitution.
Article 25, guarantees the fieedom of conscience and the right to freely
propagate, profess and practice any religion. You might be aware of the
recent incidents of violent attacks on religious missionaries that challenged
the very basis of this right. The unfortunate victims of this violence were
the minorities, especially the Christians. The implication seems to be that
Hinduism is the most authentic religion of the Indian nation, and the presence
of all other religions specially the ones of foreign origin threaten India's
nationhood. Such an argument is obviously against the very basic assumptions
of a secular state that the Constitution sought to establish in India.
-
30.4 COMMUNAL CHALLENGES TO SECU.'LAIRIS:I?
- - -- - - .
Context o f I n d i a n State
independence, the nationalist discourse realised the fragility of the new identity
based on secular nationhood as against the more familiar identities of caste
or religion. After independence however, this nationalist project of building
a secular nation lost its popular character and ideological zeal and became
merely the ideology of the state. The ruling class failed to realise that the
Indian nation was a hgile creation and required constant cultural and political
nourishment. Nationalist accounts of history that claimed for India's past a
'composite culture' were pressed into service, the implication was that it
was the evil designs of colonialism that disrupted this harmony.
In this rendering of history there is a complete denial of the fact that much
of the power of Indian nationalism itself came not from a secular idiom '
but from forces, idioms and symbols of religion, specially from ~ i n d u i s k .
We might also add here the fact that the Congress party conducted its
politics in the pre-independence period on the basis of the idea that India
was constituted of two distinct communities, the Hindus, and the Muslims.
2) Explain briefly the reasons for and the consequences of the Congress
Party's electoral strategy in the 1980s.
There also are observers who point out that the Western concept of
Secularism is not suitable to Indian society. It means the failure of that
secularism. Ashish Nandy for example argues that the ideology and politics
of secularism as understood in the western sense have more or less exhausted
their possibilities. The western uhderstanding of secularism, he suggests, is
essentially opposed to religion and believes that only universal categories can
manage the public realm. Religion, thus is perceived of as a threat to any
modern polity by virtue of not being universal. Nandy suggests that secularism
as an ideology has failed because it is seen today as being a part of a
larger package that consists of a set of standardised ideological products
and social processes like development, mega science and national security.
Being backed by the might of the state they appear essentially as violent
ideas, because to defend any of these ideas including secularism, the state
can justifiably use violence. Nandy is critical of the fact that while the modern
nation-state appeals to the believers to keep their private faiths out of public
life it is unable to ensure that the ideologies of secularism, development and
nationalism do not themselves begin to act as faiths intolerant of others. The
role of the state in such situations is likened by Nandy to that of crusading
and inquisitorial role of religious ideologies.
Besides, the proposition that the values derived fiom the secular ideology
of a secular state would somehow be a better guide to political action and
to a less violent and richer political life than values and politics based on
religious principles. Nandy contends that objectification, scientisation, and
bureaucratic-rationality, the core principles of a modern nation-state can only
breed violence. The elite in such states view statecraft in purely secular and
amoral terms thus thinking of religion or ethnicity as hurdles to the grand
project of nation-building and state formation. Thus Nandy argues, western
concept of secularism becomes a handy adjunct to a set of legitimating core
concepts; accepting this ideology, he contend, leads to the justification and
acceptance of domination and violence perpetrated in the name of progress
and modernity. It also generates hatred and violence among the believers
3t having to face a world that is fast moving out of their grip.
\
This type of secularism has been imposed on a people who never wished
o separate religion from politics, this imposition had to be made as part
3f the requirements needed to fulfil the creation of a modem nation-state,
this however has left the ordinary people of India very unhappy, who, left
with no choice, in their fight against the brutalities of the nation inathe name Content Digitized by eGyanKosh, IGNOU
of modernitv. turn to the onlv form of religjous mlitics that modernitv would
('ontext of Indian Statc
permit, namely communal politics. Thus, it is secularism as practiced that
breeds communalism. Intolerance links the two, replacing the quality of
tolerance that characterised the traditional world organised on the basis of
religion
Manoranjan Mohanty has argued that secularism can be meaningfd only when
it becomes a part of the overall process of democratic transformation. What
we have witnessed till now in India is secularism imposed through a state
that has become in~reasinglyauthoritarian. On the contrary secularism has
to become a part af a wider struggle against socio-political domination.
Indian secularism was based on the idea that the state would maintain a
principled distance from religion but would address itself to matters rising
out of religious concerns when the need arises. However, the cardinal rule
would be that the considerations for both keeping away and for interfering
would always be non-sectarian. The problem with the Indian state's practice
of secularism has been that it has increasingly been acting out of sectarian
interests. A survey of the Constitutional provisions suggest very clearly the
fiamework of a secular state (despite certain anomalies), however, the politics,
the nature and the functioning of the Indian state seem to suggest a drift
1 away from this framework. The discrediting of democratic politics, the party
system and political institutions has created a void that has been occupied
by communal forces. This definitely is a major challenge to the secular
fiamework of the Indian state. In order to fight this challenge, the struggle
for secularism has to become part of the struggle of the ordinary people
of India for their right to a life that is dignified and politically, economically
and culturally free.
31.0 OBJECTIVES
Indian society is mkked by the inequalities on bases of caste, creed, sex,
economy; etc. India adopted a democratic set up in order to establish society
which is based on the principles of justice and equality. After going through
this unit, you will be able to understand:
/
Relationship between democracy and equality; and
Provisions in the Constitution regarding establishment of equality among
various sections of Indian Society.
I
last five decades of democratic experiment in India. Has the state in India
I
been able to meet the ideals of founding fathers of the Constitution? HasContent Digitized by eGyanKosh, IGNOU
political democracy been congruent with the given unequal social and economic
Context o f Indian State
order? Has political democracy been instrumental in advancing and realising
the ideals of social and economic demucracy? Can demucracy be contextualised
simply in terms of political participation of the majority of.citizens in electoral
process? Has the ideal of substantive democracy been advanced along-with
the procedural democracy? These are some of the questions which invite
our attention in the analysis of the problems of democracy and its functioning
vis a vis the state in India. The subsequent sections attempt to analyse the
dynamics of democracy in India especially in terms of its quest for establishing
an order based on the principle of equality and justice.
Along with the other leaders of the national movement and architects of
the Constitution 'of India, Ambedkar was quitk aware that the realisation
of the democratic ideals of equality, Ifberty and fraternity were not possible
without a strong constitutional backing. The interests and rights of the
deprived and excluded cannot be safeguarded without cdtutional mechanism. . .
The simplistic principle of equality and equal. opportunity would create a hiatus
between political democracy and social and economic democracy. Therefore,
harmony between the two appeared as requisites of democratic' state and
nation building in India.
3) ~ Which Articles provides for the protection and promotion of the cultural
rights of the minorities? Discuss.
Over the years the working of the resehation policy has shown that the
spread of the benefits has not been uniform among different groups. Therefore,
the different categories of reservation policy cannot be treated on similar
plane. If we take Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes into consideration,
we come across the fact that during the last fifty years of the working of
the Republic, the constitutional goal of social justice has not been translated
into reality. The emergence of a miniscule minority among them on account
I of socio-economic transformation and protective discrimination policy is
symbolic of empowerment. In real situation of socio-economic life, they are
far behind the other groups of the population. The practice of untouchability ,
and maintaining of ritual distance has not disappeared from the public life
particularly in rural areas. Most of the cases relating to them are not reported,
but it does not ensure the realization of the civil rights of these groups.
Segregation in residential pattern, predominant occupational pattern, high
incidence of poverty and non-ownershiplmarginal ownerslqf of land are some
of the indicators of their perpetual backwardness. Atrocities against dalits
in different parts of the country are still alarming. It is pertinent to note
here that atrocities are committed not only in states like Bihar, which
frequently occupies the popular imagination and common perception of the
people, but also and even more in relatively advanced and peaceful states
of India. So far as their rate of literacy is concerned it is far behind the
general population. A comparative kgure of literacy rate may indicate the
state of affair:
Notes: I. NSP stands for non-scheduled population and general includes all the popuhtion.
2. When, the percentage of literacy for the years 1971 and 1981 has been calculated
by dividing the literates by the total population, inclusive of the children in the
age group of 0-4,in 1991, the same has been calculated' in exclusion of the children
in the age group of .0-6.
Source: B.S. Bhargava and Avinash Sarnal "Protective Discrimination and Development of
Scheduled Castes: An Alternative Model for Good Governance". Indian Journal of Public
Administration, Vol. XLIV, No.3, Annual Issue, 1998.
Similarly, the enrolment ratio and drop-out rate in schools among the Scheduled
Castes students have been quite negative as compared to the geineral
population: All the indicaton of their backwardness suggest that the afkmtive
action programmes have not been implemented properly. The approach of
'capacity endowment' of these groups along with protective discrimination
policy has marginally altered the situation. After fifty years of the working
of the constitutional measure of protective discrimination policy, there is stillContent Digitized by eGyanKosh, IGNOU
a oan hptwppn\thp rlppirpd a n a l a n d a ~ h ~ a
o r lh i p v p m p n t Thp r-recpntatinn
Context of Fndian State
of SCs and STs in the central government services speaks of the truth.
It is quite clear that they are mainly employed in Group C and Group
D services. More than fifty per cent of the Safai Karamchari (Sweeper)
come from this group, which indicate a kind of occupational continuity. ,The
notion of impurity and degradation associated with such jobs among caste
Hindus appears to be the factor of high representation of SCs and STs
and low among the upper castes.
Even if a middle class has emerged among the Scheduled Castes due to
the measure of protective discrimination policy, they do not enjoy the same
amount of honour and prestige associated with their achieved status as
enjoyed by the members of other higher castes. Moreover, a status incongruity
between their caste status and achieved status still persists.
3) What are the reasons for the inter regional differences in the rise of
backward classes?
The composition of Rajya Sabha changes every two years. The figures of Rajya Sabha have
been picked up only for those years which allow comparison with Lok Sabha. The average
for Rajya Sabha is based on these years only.
Source: CSDS Data Unit, Delhi.
Tripura - NE NE 0.0 1 3.3 1.7 6.7 3.3 NE 1.7 - 3.0 Content Digitized by eGyanKosh, IGNOU
Uttar
- . .
1.2 5.8 4.4 2.8* 5.9 2.6 5.6 7.3 3.3* 4.0' - 4.1
Context of Indian State
Notes: Table entry stands for % of women MLAs elected to state legislatures in the relevant
elections
States did not exits; NE: No elections held in that yearlperiod; * : Two elections held
during this period. The figure given here is an average of the two; ** In 1952 the Election
Commission did not recognise women as a separate category. The figures given here are
based on name recognition and hence liable to under-reporting of women representatives.
Source: CSDS Data Unit, Delhi.
In fact, the other view-point believes that woman should get fair deal in
the democratic dispensation of the political order. In this dispensation their
presence cannot be ensured, wherein the male-dominated view persists even
in the field of modern politics. A special quota for women-in this regard
offers a substantive alternative. In fact a system of reservation for women
would provide an impetus to both the women as well as to the political
parties to give a fairer deal to nearly half the population in various units
of government. The political power and electoral calculations in favour of
the emerging dominant force of backward classes have compelled the
successive governments to direct the policy of protective discrimination in
their favour. But the women question in this category has not invited a serious
attention of the political elites. The Constitution (eighty-first Amendment) Bill,
1996 is still pending. The passage of the Bill has been scuttled by the political
parties on one pretext or the other. The basic issue, however, remains
unaddressed.
Check Your Progress Exercise 3
Note: i) Use the space given below for y o u answers.
ii) Check your answers with the model answers given at the end
of the unit.
1) Summarise the arguments for and against the reservation for women.
To sum up, from the above exposition we can say that democratic experiment
in India during the last five decades has been a mix bag of success and
failure. Whereas the procedural democracy has taken deep roots in terms
of periodic elections, voter turnout and large scale participation of the people
in electoral process, we have not been able to equalise <he opportunity and
condition of a democratic structure. Inter-group equality has not been
established and there is still a vast gap between political democracy and
social and economic democracy. Affirmative action of the state in favour
of the deprived groups and communities has gone a long way towards
creating a democratic conscious among the people. The recent decades of
India are now seen as the decades of 'democratic upsurge'. Therefore,
though democracy is still in search of equality in India it has paved a way
for the democratic assertion from below. It can be concluded that democracy
from above provided to the people at the time of independence is transforming
itself in a democracy from below claimed by the people after over fifty
years of India's democratic republic.
32.0 OBJECTIVES
Crime, repression and terror have become commonly used adjectives to
describe Indian politics. Each of these aspects, however, has specific meanings
within the fiameyork of democratic theory. They are o h seen as perversions
in democracy, and manifestations of a rupture in the democratic processes.
AAer going through this unit, you will be able to understand:
How crime, repression and terror form significant contexts of Indian
politics; and
The manner in which they determine the content of Indian politics.
3 2.1 INTRODUCTION
32.1.1 The Meanings of Politics
Before one can begin talking about crime, repression and terror ifi Indian
politics, it perhaps makes sense to talk first about the meaning of 'politics'.
It is only after having understood the meaning'of politics, that we can
understand how crime, repression and terror, 'corrupt' or 'pervert' politics,
and change its meaning altogether. Generally speaking, the expression politics
refers to a distinctive space as well the activities and relationships which
characterise the space. ~ h u sin our common usage of the term we tend
to differentiate the 'political' h m other spheres of human activity which form
the private concerns of individuals and groups, viz., social, cultural, economic,
etc. Politics has generally been understood in three broad ways:
a) Politics is seen as associated with governmental activities. This understanding
of politics can perhaps be illustrated with the help of the notion of politics
as it existed in classical Greece. Politics in Greek usage pertained to
participation in decision-making and the, exercise of authority. In the
nineteen sixties, David Easton conceptualised politics as the 'authoritative
allocation of values'. For others like Bernard Crick, politics refers not
so much to authoritative decision-making, but the processes by which Content Digitized by eGyanKosh, IGNOU
decisions could be reached amiably.
Contcrt o f Indian State b) Politics is also understood as referring to the public domain, a space
which is distinguished fiom the private and personal. This domain, unlike
the private space, is concerned with activities whereby norms and rules
which govern the entire society are determined and applied through the
use of covert andlor overt coercive power.
c) There is yet another understanding of politics which seeks to change
radically the above understandings of politics. According to this
understanding, politics refers not merely to decision-making but pertains
to the manner in which power, wealth and resources. are distributed in
society. Politics is also not seen as confined to the public domain, but
as something which permeates all institutions and unfolds at every level
of social existence. We may mention here, that the feminists were the
most persuasive in this redefinition of politics, emphasising that the private
sphere including the family was also permeated with power structures.
Therefore this definition also includes in its scope, struggles by people
and movements of resistance which aim at altering the manner in which
resources are distributed in society, in order to make society more
egalitarian.
32.1.2 Transitions in Indian Politics
From politics of trust to politics of suspicion, the two decades immediately
following independence have been characterised by Rajni Kothari as 'decades
of trust'. Politics in these decades was determined by a sense of trust
between people marked by a mutual concern h d understanding about what
constituted the 'common good'. Politics was seen as an 'ethical space' where
conflicts were resolved amiably and honourably. The seventies, however,
marked according to Rajni Kothari, an 'obituary' of the politics of trust
of the preceding decades. The 'ethical space' of politics was vitiated by
violence, crime, corruption and repression, marking what Kothari calls the
'the virtual elimiiation of politics':
What we confront today is not the crisis of politics but its virtual elimination.
The last decade has marked the beginning of the Indian State that has not
only deprived society of a basic consensus, but which has eschewed any
scope of dialogue $om it. The violence, the fear, the repression, the rhetoric
of deceit and d&ublespeak, are symptoms not of crises, but of the end
of politics. (Rajni Kothari, Politics and the People: In search of a Humane
India, Ajanta Prakashan, Deihi, 1989, p.439. emphasis added)
Indian politics was no longer the democratic space where, through dialogue
and interaction, the aspirations and needs of the people could be affirmed
and resolved. The 'end of politics' is seen as the period in which the
relationship of dialogue among people as well as the people and the state,
is ruptured by crime, repression and terror as the means of conflict resolption.
Crime, repression and terror make themselves manifest in several forms. In
the sections that follow we shall examine crime, repression' and terror
respectively, as they appear as characteristics of, and provide the;contexts,
in which politics in India unfolds.
The Election Commission too has pointed out the existence of a large number
of Members of Legislative Assemblies (henceforth MLAs) having criminal
records, and the need of weeding out criminal elements fiom politics. During
the 1998 Lok Sabha elections, an eminent panel consisting of Justice Kuldip
Singh, Madhav Godbole, C. Subramaniurn and Swami Agnivesh, identified
as many as 72 Lok Sabha candidates facing serious criminal cases. It may
be said that the majority of criminals enter the electoral fray through the
medium of National and State parties, including the two large& all-India
parties. Another alarming fact is that the bulk of the criminal candidates fell Content Digitized by eGyanKosh, IGNOU
in the categories of accused of serious crimes. Thev include Dersons alreadv
Context of Indian State charge-sheeted by a judicial court or by an investigating agency and those
with long crime hiistory (Outlook, 23 February 1998, 10-11).
The dictionary meanings of 'repress' are 'to restrain', 'to keep under', 'to
put down', etc. The terms repression and repressive are more often than
not, associated with political regimes and governments, as a description of
their character and functioning. Like 'criminalisation', repression too, denotes
a disruption in democratic relationships in the domain of politics. It also
b
1 indicates the degeneration of politics as an ethical space where democratic
1 participation takes place. We have mentioned in the earlier section that Rajni
Kothari characterised the decade of the seventies as the beginning of the
period of the demise or elimination of politics, owing to a growkg criminalisation
of politics. In a similar vein, A.R. Desai spoke of the same period as
characterised by a growing 'assault' on the democratic rights of the people
by the law and order machinery of the state. This period, points out Desai,
was characterised by an 'assertion' of the large masses of the 'economically
exploited' classes, and the socially, politically and culturally oppressed sections,
of their elementary aspirations and demands for basic rights. If we recall
here the third definition of politics, i.e., as a means to distribute resources,
we may see the struggles by the large masses of the oppressed and excluded
people, as trying to effect change in the manner in which resources were
being distributed in society. They were, in other words, trying to transform
the inegalitarian political-institutional and social-cultural structures through which
'authoritative allocation of values' were being made. The struggles made
themselves manifest in various forms viz., Constitutional Court battles,
processions, strikes, dharnas, satyagrahas, and militant actions. The response
of the state was frequently to silence these voices of protest through various
measures both legal and extra-legal. These struggles by the people to radically
change the structures of power and decision making were seen by successive
governments as 'anti-social' and a threat to law and order in society. They
took recourse to a wide range of 'legal' and 'administrative' measures to
restore 'law and order', curb 'anti-social' elements, and halt the processes
of change in the existing structures of authority. There are a,nu.ber of articles
and reports which chronicle the violation of the righp of various marginalised
sections, including the dalits, the scheduled castes and scheduled tribes, the
working class, women, religious minorities, etc. They also list the various
measures - legal (including the preventive detention laws, disturbed areas iaws
etc.), and extra-legal (disappearances, encounter deaths etc.) - through which
aspirations for change were dealt with by subsequent regimes.
While the term 'terror' can be more or less accurately defined, the concept
of terrorism is less precise. Contested meanings have been attached to the
concept drawing from its history, its modem contexts, and the perspective
or vantage point from which one looks at it. In its historical origins the
term has been associated with terror by governments, notably by the French
revolutionary government against its opponents, and by the Bolsheviks in
Russia after 1917. In its contemporary usage, however, the frames of
reference seem to have shifted to cover acts of terror by the opponents
of governments and include bombings, assassinations, hostage taking and
plane hijackings. Also by the 1970s terms like international terrorism and
state terrorism gained widespread currency. While the former referred to
acts of terror by political groups outside the country in which they were
primarily active, the latter referred to (alleged) encouragement and support
by states of such acts of terrorism. In its current usage, three diverse
Content Digitized by eGyanKosh, IGNOU
meanings of terror and terrorism co-exist: (a) Acts of terror which occur
;n er\n+l;fit 4rlrlnn o;h~nf;r\nc ~ x r ; t h ; n nnGnnal h n ~ ~ n A a r iemo ~nrnrn~mallcprtarian
and ethnic violence in ethnically mixed or plural societies e.g., the conflicts Crime, Repression and
Terror in Indian Politics
between Christians and Muslims in Lebanon, between Tamils and Sinhalese
in Sri Lanka, Catholics and Protestants in p or them Ireland etc. (b) Very
often, however, most acts of terror are seen as carried out by the state
itself. While Nazism and Stalinism are often cited as relevant examples, there
are and have existed repressive regimes in this century (e.g. Pinochet's Chile).
It is argued that terror and coercion often play important roles in maintaining
state domination and power. (c) Acts of terror which form a part of the
larger agenda of radical social and political change or national independence.
In these cases it is argued the 'rejection' of 'terrorist' tactics has no bearing
on questions of 'legitimacy' of the larger goals of the struggle (see Fred
Halliday, 'Terrorism', in Joel Krieger ed. The Oxford Companion to Politics
of the World, New York, 1993, 902-904).
Legal definitions of terrorism have been modified h m time to time and these
definitions have invariably cited concerns about the 'security environment' of
India. The Law Commission's recommendations in April 2000, for bringing
in a new Bill, the Prevention of Terrorism Bill, noted the absence of a
'comprehensive anti-terrorism law7 to fill in the vacuum which had &sen
after the expiry of TADA. It cited the security concerns arising from 'terrorist
violence' in Jammu and Kashmir and the North-East, and the continuing
vulnerability of Punjab to sqch violence. The proposed Bill did not become
an Act. In the context of a worldwide condemnation of terrorist violence
aAer the 11 September, 2001 bombing of the World Trade Centre towers
in New York City, and the Pentagon in Washington D.C., the government
has been able to bring in first an Ordinance to deal with terrorism, viz.,
The Prevention of Terrorism Ordinance, 2001, (POTO) and then a law
Prevention of Terrorism Act (POTA).
................................................................................................................
3) What are the Civil liberty Right groups?