0% found this document useful (0 votes)
10 views

Lecture 3. Presentation. Government Failure, Positive Vs Normative Analysis

The document discusses the role of government in a market economy and introduces the concept of public economics. It covers the fundamental theorem of welfare economics, market failures as a rationale for government intervention, potential government failures, and the difference between positive and normative economic analysis.

Uploaded by

Thùy Trang
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
10 views

Lecture 3. Presentation. Government Failure, Positive Vs Normative Analysis

The document discusses the role of government in a market economy and introduces the concept of public economics. It covers the fundamental theorem of welfare economics, market failures as a rationale for government intervention, potential government failures, and the difference between positive and normative economic analysis.

Uploaded by

Thùy Trang
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 10

LOGO

PUBLIC ECONOMICS
Pareto conditions for efficiency

CHAPTER 1 (cont.)
OVERVIEW ON THE ROLE OF THE STATE IN THE MARKET
ECONOMY AND INTRODUCTION OF THE PUBLIC
ECONOMICS COURSE
Day 03

Rationales for the role of


government in market economy

2
2.3. Fundamental theorem of welfare economics

Perfect competition Certain conditions Pareto efficiency

❖ Can you prove that theorem?


❖ What are limitations of the theorem?
▪ Market failures: Nonexistence of perfect competition
▪ Fairness versus efficiency
▪ Certain conditions: Economic stability and Closed economy
➔ If limitation occurs, there is no guarantee that the market
economy will produce socially desired outcomes
➔ Need government interventions

3
2.4. Market failures and call for government intervention

Limitation of the Theorem Role of government


Market failures: situation in which the
Resource reallocation: To correct
allocation of goods and services is not
market failures:
socially efficient.
• Monopoly
- Monopoly
• Externalities
- Public goods
• Public Goods
- Externalities
• Asymmetric Information
- Asymmetric information
Failure to ensure fairness/equity Income redistribution
• For equality
• Merit goods
Macroeconomic instability Macroeconomic stabilization
(Macroeconomics)
Globalization and international Protection of national interests
integration (Macroeconomics in open economy)
4
2.5. Government failures

❖ a situation ❖Causes:
where governme
nt intervention in
the economy to
correct a
market failure cre 2. Lack of
1. Inadequate information controllability towards
ates inefficiency
individuals’ reactions
and leads to a
misallocation of
scarce resources.
➔ Many policy
failures are paved
3. Lack of controllability
by good intention 4. Constraints of
towards public servants
political process
5
Conclusion

The best government is the one with minimal


intervention

6
3. Positive and normative analysis

Positive economics:
❖ The study of economics based on objective analysis.
❖ Focuses on causes and effects, behavioral relationships, and
facts involved in the evolution and development of economic
theories.
❖ Positive economics is often called the "what is" economics.

Example:
❖ “Increasing the interest rate will encourage people to save”
❖ Why this is considered a positive economic statement?

Because:
➔ it does not contain value judgements and
➔ its accuracy can be tested.

7
3. Positive and normative analysis (2)

Normative economics:
❖ A perspective on economics that reflects personal judgments or opinions
and reactions toward economic projects, statements, and scenarios.
❖ Heavily concerns with value judgments and theoretical scenarios and
economic statements that present "what ought to be" rather than facts and
cause-and-effect statements.
❖ Expresses judgments about what may result of economic activities if public
policy changes are done.
❖ Normative economics is often called the “ought-to-be" economics.

Example:
❖ “We should cut taxes in half to increase disposable income levels”
❖ Why this is considered a normative economic statement?

Because:
➔ it mirrors value judgements, which assumes that disposable income must
be increased
➔ its accuracy cannot be tested.

8
Difference between positive and normative
analysis

Positive analysis Normative analysis


Objective and fact-based Subjective and value-based
Do not have to be correct, but must be Opinion based, impossible to prove or
able to be tested and proved or disprove
disproved
Example: Example:
“Government-provided healthcare “Government should provide basic
increases public expenditures” healthcare to all citizens”

9
Discussion: Normative or Positive
statement?

❖ Lowering the price of cigarettes has increased the


demand for cigarettes among teenage consumers.
❖ Women should be provided higher school loans
than men.
❖ Working citizens should not pay for hospital care.
❖ The rise of crude oil prices lessens the use of cars
and increases the demand for bicycles.
❖ Laborers should receive greater parts of capitalist
profits
❖ Brewer profits will drop if the government taxes
alcohol.

10

You might also like