0% found this document useful (0 votes)
7 views4 pages

PRO Ass 2017

This document outlines an assessment schedule for a mathematics and statistics exam. It provides expected coverage, learning objectives, and achievement criteria for several questions testing probability concepts like proportions, normal distributions, and hypothesis testing.

Uploaded by

h.boyce
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
7 views4 pages

PRO Ass 2017

This document outlines an assessment schedule for a mathematics and statistics exam. It provides expected coverage, learning objectives, and achievement criteria for several questions testing probability concepts like proportions, normal distributions, and hypothesis testing.

Uploaded by

h.boyce
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

NCEA Level 2 Mathematics and Statistics (91267) 2017 — page 1 of 4 – Final

Assessment  Schedule  –  2017  


Mathematics  and  Statistics:    
Apply  probability  methods  in  solving  problems  (91267)  
Evidence  Statement  

Q1 Expected Coverage Achievement(u) Merit(r) Excellence(t)

(a)(i) 222 Proportion correct.


p= = 0.4379
507

(ii) 507 Expected number


p= = 0.2028 correct.
2500
Expected No. = 0.2028 × 585000
= 118 638

(iii) 285 One risk correct. T1: Comparison with


Risk of female obesity = = 0.220 Relative risk 20% but conclusion
1295
222 correct. ignores strict inequality
Risk of male obesity = = 0.184 or rounds excessively
1205
0.220 T2: Comparison
Relative risk = = 1.1946
0.184 with 20% and correct
As this is not over 20% more, the article is not conclusion based on
correct. strict inequality

Number of female
(b)(i) Smoker Non-smoker Total non-smokers found
Male 53 169 222 (235). Proportion
correct.
Female 50 235 285
Total 103 404 507

235
= 0.4635
507

Risk of smoker obese = 103 = 0.245 One risk correct. Clear


(ii) 420 conclusion
Risk of non-smoker obese = 404 = 0.194 using correct
2080 risks.
Claim is justified since there is a greater risk of
being obese if a smoker.

NØ N1 N2 A3 A4 M5 M6 E7 E8

No relevant A valid 1 of u 2 of u 3 of u 1 of r 2 of r 1 of T1 1 of T2
evidence. attempt at one
question.
NCEA Level 2 Mathematics and Statistics (91267) 2017 — page 2 of 4 – Final

Q2 Expected Coverage Achievement(u) Merit(r) Excellence(t)

(a)(i) P = 0.65 × 0.86 = 0.559 Probability correct.

(ii) P = 0.35 × 0.4 = 0.14 Probability correct.


Accept
4
P = 0.35 × = 0.0933
15

(iii) Consider 1000 ewes that lamb. Correct numerator of 559


Nr of lambs from single birth that survive 559 or 0.559 used in 559 + 700x + y
=1000 × 0.65 × 0.86 = 559 a fraction
x = y = 0.4
Nr of lambs from twin births …
Where both survive p = 0.571
= 1000 × 0.35 × 0.4 × 2 = 280** 4 8
x= ,y=
Where one survives 15 15
= 1000 × 0.35 × 0.4 × 1 = 140 p = 0.599
P(lamb from single | surviving lamb) Accept
0.559 559
= = = 0.571 559
559 + 420 979 = 0.6663
839

(iv) Consider 1000 ewes: 0.85 used correctly,


Nr producing 1 live lamb such as Consistent Solution correct:
= 1000 × (0.85 × 0.65 × 0.86 + 0.85 × 0.35 × 0.85 × 0.65 × 0.86 answer not 85(0.559 + 0.7x
0.4) =0.4752 accounting for + 0.35y)
= 1000 × (0.475 + 0.119) = 594 lambs 2 twin lambs,
x = y = 0.4 :
giving 71.3%
Nr producing 2 live lambs p = 83.2%
=1000 × ( 0.85 × 0.35 × 0.4) = 119 4 8
x= ,y=
→ 119 × 2 = 238 lambs** 15 15
594 + 238 p = 79.3%
Lambing percentage = = 83.2%
1000
(accept decimal)

(b) p = 3 × 0.06 × 0.88 = 0.032 0.06 × 0.88 correct. Probability


5 correct.

NØ N1 N2 A3 A4 M5 M6 E7 E8

No relevant A valid 1 of u 2 of u 3 of u 1 of r 2 of r 1 of t 2 of t
evidence. attempt at one
question.
NCEA Level 2 Mathematics and Statistics (91267) 2017 — page 3 of 4 – Final

Q3 Expected Coverage Achievement(u) Merit(r) Excellence(t)

(a)(i) P(0 < Z < 1.154) = 0.3757 Probability correct.

(ii) P(Z < z) = 0.1 ⇒ z = –1.28 to -1.282 z = –1.284 (-1.28)


correct. Correct answer.
x − 4125 Accept CAO.
= –1.28 to -1.282
65
x = 4125 – 1.281 × 65
= 4041.67, 4041.735 or 4041.8 g
=4042 g (4sf)

(iii) Tables: P(0<Z<z) = 0.1 ⇒ z = 0.253(3471) z = 0.253 correct Expression (*) Correct answer
set up with working.
4000 − 3975 OR
= 0.253(3471) * Consistent
σ
= solution based
4000 − 3975
σ= = 98.814 (98.6816) (3dp) g on incorrect z
0.253
OR OR OR
OR
σ=99 Working and Working and
Record of “guess and check” giving
σ = 98.7 σ = 98.68
σ = 98.67885

(iv) P(Weight > 4025) p = 0.617 correct


= P(Z > –0.2976 ) = 0.617 OR Probability
2 consistent p2 correct.
P(Both > 4025) = (0.617) = 0.381

(b)(i) p = 35 = 0.7 Proportion correct.


50

(ii) Comparison of the distributions given below Two valid


for the normal (expected) distribution vs comparative
sample distribution, resp. Numerical comments about
Three valid
justification given in [ ]. different aspects of
comparative
Possible valid comments about differences: shape, centre and
comments about
Shape: spread. Four valid
different aspects
1. Symmetrical vs not symmetrical comparative
of shape, centre
2. Averages all same vs not all same comments about
and spread with
different aspects
[4050 vs various] numerical
of shape, centre
3. Unimodal vs bimodal [4050/both justification for
and spread with
“3950” and “4050”] at least two
numerical
Centre: comments.
justification for at
4. Medians [4050 vs over 4050] least three
(do not accept modes) comments.
Spread:
5. Range [550 vs 350], or estimates of
SD or IQR (with reasoning)
Possible valid comments about similarities:
Centre:
6. Means [both 4050]
Probability:
7. P(w > 4000) [0.724 vs 0.7]
NCEA Level 2 Mathematics and Statistics (91267) 2017 — page 4 of 4 – Final

NØ N1 N2 A3 A4 M5 M6 E7 E8

No relevant A valid 1 of u 2 of u 3 of u 1 of r 2 of r 1 of t 2 of t
evidence. attempt at one
question.

Cut Scores
Not Achieved Achievement Achievement with Merit Achievement with Excellence

0–7 8 – 13 14 – 19 20 – 24

You might also like