Chapter 6
Chapter 6
Financial management
1
Concepts
Independent Projects
Projects with cash flows that are not affected by the acceptance or non-
acceptance of other projects.
Concepts
Normal cash flows: one or more cash outflows (costs) followed by a series
of cash inflows.
Nonnormal cash flows: the signs of the cash flows change more than
once.
2
1. An Overview of Capital budgeting
Should we
build this
plant?
• Mergers.
• Other projects.
3
1. An Overview of Capital Budgeting
The criteria for deciding to accept or reject projects:
4. Payback
4
2. Net Present Value (NPV)
Example:
Project S
𝐶𝐹1 𝐶𝐹2 𝐶𝐹3 𝐶𝐹4
𝑁𝑃𝑉 = 𝐶𝐹0 + 1
+ 2
+ 3
+ 4
1+𝑟 1+𝑟 1+𝑟 1+𝑟
5
2. Net Present Value (NPV)
Project L
➢ Mutually exclusive projects: Accept the project with the highest positive
NPV. If no project has a positive NPV, reject them all.
A positive NPV → the project is expected to add value to the firm → increase
the wealth of the owners.
6
3. Internal Rate of Return (IRR)
The discount rate that forces a project’s NPV to equal zero.
7
3. Internal Rate of Return (IRR)
Project L
➢ Mutually exclusive projects: Accept the project with the highest IRR,
provided that IRR is greater than WACC. Reject all projects if the best
IRR does not exceed WACC.
8
4. Multiple Internal Rate of Return
The situation where a project has two or more IRRs.
0 WACC = 10% 1 2
IRR1 = 25%
IRR2 = 400%
NPV
IRR2 = 400%
450
0 WACC
100 400
IRR1 = 25%
-800
9
5. Modified Internal Rate of Return (MIRR)
The discount rate at which the present value of a project’s cost is equal to
the present value of its terminal value, where the terminal value is found
as the sum of the future values of the cash inflows, compounded at the
firm’s cost of capital.
➢ Mutually exclusive projects: Accept the project with the highest MIRR.
10
NPV, IRR & MIRR
Independent projects: the NPV, IRR, and MIRR always reach the same
accept/reject conclusion
→ the three criteria are equally good when evaluating independent projects.
Mutually exclusive projects that differ in size: the NPV is best because it
selects the project that maximizes value.
→ The MIRR is superior to the regular IRR as an indicator of a project’s
“true” rate of return
→ NPV is better than IRR and MIRR when choosing among competing
projects.
21 Faculty of Finance & Banking
21
6. Payback period
The length of time required for an investment’s cash flows to cover its cost.
Calculated by adding project’s cash inflows to its cost until the cumulative
cash flow for the project turns positive.
11
6. Payback period
6. Payback period
Project S
Year 0 1 2 3 4
Payback =
12
6. Payback period
Project L
Year 0 1 2 3 4
Payback =
6. Payback period
The decision rule
➢ Mutually exclusive projects: The shorter the payback, the better the
project
13
6. Payback period
Three flaws of the PP method
6. Payback period
Discounted Payback
The length of time required for an investment’s cash flows, discounted at the
investment’s cost of capital, to cover its cost.
Compute the present value of each cash flow and then determine how long it
takes to pay back on a discounted basis
Although the payback methods have faults as ranking criteria, they do provide
information about liquidity and risk
14
6. Payback period
Discounted Payback - Project S
Year 0 1 2 3 4
Cash flow -1000 500 400 300 100
Discounted cash flow
Cumulative discounted cash flow
Discounted Payback =
6. Payback period
Discounted Payback - Project L
Year 0 1 2 3 4
Cash flow -1.000 100 300 400 675
Discounted cash flow
Cumulative discounted cash flow
Discounted Payback =
15
Summary
We should consider several investment criteria when making decisions
NPV and IRR are the most commonly used primary investment criteria
End of Chapter 6
Financial management
32
16