A Rolling Resistance Simulation of Tires Using Static Finite Element Analysis
A Rolling Resistance Simulation of Tires Using Static Finite Element Analysis
net/publication/276948147
CITATIONS READS
54 1,810
4 authors, including:
Masataka Koishi
The Yokohama Rubber Co.,Ltd., Japan
90 PUBLICATIONS 859 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Masataka Koishi on 01 February 2017.
REFERENCE: Shida, Z., Koishi, M., Kogure, T., and Kabe, K., " A Rolling Resistance
Simulation of Tires Using Static Finite Element Analysis," Tire Science and Technology,
TSTCA, Vol. 27, No. 2, April-June 1999, pp. 84-105.
ABSTRACT: A practical rolling resistance simulation method for tires using a static
finite element method is presented that fulfills three requirements: ( 1 ) easy input data
preparation, (2) shorter computation time, and (3) adequate accuracy. The method
implements a static deflection analysis first and the stress and strain thus obtained,
together with the loss factors of the materials determined separately, are used to esti-
mate the energy dissipation of a rolling tire.
First, ~he stress and strain profiles of all element groups that have the same cross-
sectional coordinates and are located along the circumferential direction are obtained.
Second, hysteresis loops are computed by introducing a viscoelastic phase lag between
the stress and strain profiles. The sum of the areas of the hysteresis loops is regarded
as the dissipation energy density of the element group. The loss factors of the rubber
materials are experimentally obtained and the effective loss tangents of the fiber-re-
inforced rubber are determined by the homogenization theory of dynamic viscoelas-
ticity. The rolling resistance simulation of a passenger radial tire using this approach
accurately captures the trends of an actual tire.
KEY WORDS: tire, finite element analysis, rolling resistance, energy dissipation, ho-
mogenization, viscoelasticity
84
SHIDA ET AL. ON ROLLING RESISTANCE SIMULATION 85
RR = ED/L (1)
where ED and L are the total energy dissipation of the tire and the traveling
distance, respectively. Both Eo and L may be evaluated by finite elements for
a statically loaded tire. Since the CPU cost of static finite element analysis is
much cheaper than the dynamic analysis, the method is thought to be an ef-
fective tool for evaluating the rolling resistance of tires.
86 TIRE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
A B
SS 0 ~3
Strain O9
Strain
FIG. 1 - - Stress-strain relationship of viscoelastic materials under cyclic loading." (A ) Phase lag
between stress and strain; ( B ) hysteresis loop.
Energy Dissipation
When a sinusoidal strain is imposed on viscoelastic materials such as rubber,
the stress varies sinusoidally with a phase angle (5 as shown in Fig. 1A. The
area confined by the hysteresis loop of the stress-strain plot corresponds to the
dissipated energy density caused by cyclic loading, as seen in Fig. lB. When
the stress cr and the strain e of the viscoelastic material are assumed to vary
sinusoidally, they may be expressed using the phase lag (5:
Ed = V f cr(t)dc
ycle (4)
= 7r- V" o-0"r sin (5
where V is the volume of the viscoelastic material, c~0 is the amplitude of the
stress, % is the amplitude of the strain, and (5 is the viscoelastic phase lag
between stress and strain. Therefore, the energy dissipation may be obtained
if these four values V, ~o, Co, 6 are known. In the present method, the finite
element analysis of a statically loaded tire is used to evaluate the amplitude
of the stress and strain and the volume of the material. For the phase lag
between stress and strain, experimental values corresponding to the loss factor
of the material are used. The treatment of the loss factor of the fiber-reinforced
rubber is discussed in more detail later. The estimation procedure for the en-
ergy dissipation during one rotation of the tire follows.
SHIDA ET AL. ON ROLLING RESISTANCE SIMULATION 87
t, 3
z s 13 1
x/
FIG. 2 - - F i n i t e e l e m e n t c o o r d i n a t e s y s t e m : x, y, z - g l o b a l a x e s ; r, s, t - e l e m e n t a x e s ; 1, 2,
3 - m a t e r i a l axes.
The stress and strain evaluated at the continuous elements along the circum-
ferential direction are considered to be the time history of the stress and strain
at any point of the rolling tire. Thus, the time t which is a parameter repre-
senting the variation, may be replaced by an angle 0 which represents the
circumferential position of a tire. Then, the stress profile or(0) and strain profile
e(0) are obtained from the toroidal element groups located along the circum-
ferential direction with the same cross-sectional coordinates.
In many conventional finite elements, the stress and strain are expressed
with respect to the global coordinates. However, this treatment results in a
variation in appearance, even if they are constant, e.g., pure inflation of the
tire. Therefore, the stress and the strain in terms of the global coordinate
system need to be transformed into the stress and strain with respect to the
element coordinate system, as shown in Fig. 2. Also, the stress and strain
of the fiber-reinforced rubber materials need to be transformed into the
material coordinates which are convenient to deal with in the case of an-
isotropic loss factors in unidirectional reinforced composites.
Next, the viscoelastic phase lag/5 is imposed on the stress profile o-(0).
However, since the general profile of the stress and strain is impulsive rather
than sinusoidal as shown in Fig. 3, it is not possible to apply the phase lag
in the form of Eq 2. Relating to this, Park et al. [4] proposed a technique
to approximate the stress and strain profiles using cubic polynomials, and
a viscoelastic phase lag is imposed on the approximated stress. However,
the phase lag 6 in their method necessarily results in an n-times excess in
the nth harmonic component. Allen et al. [5] proposed a technique to fit
the stress and strain profiles numerically to a harmonic cosine series using
88 TIRE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
0 (2=)
0.150
ca
v
=
0.100
09
0.050
0.000 . . . . i . . . . i . . . . i . . . .
0 1/2~ = 3/2= 2~
N
or(0) = ag + ~ {a~ cos (nO) + b~sin(nO)} (5)
n=l
and
N
e(0) = a~ + ~ {a~ cos (nO) + b~, sin (nO)} (6)
n=l
SHIDA ET AL. ON ROLLING RESISTANCE SIMULATION 89
2 5 9 00 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
o (2~)
20.00
13_
15.00
v
1
10.00
if)
5.00
0.00
0 1/2~ ~ 3/2rc 2~
FIG. 4 -- Stress profile of the belt edge in the longitudinal direction along the cord.
Our experience shows that the number of terms N needs to be more than
15 to adequately capture the peaks of the impulsive stress and strain pro-
files. Equations 5 and 6 may be rewritten as Eqs 7 and 8, using amplitude
A~ and phase 4~.:
where
A. = ~aa] + b]
0.050 I , I , I ' I I , I I I I I I I I I I
0 (2~)
0.025
Ix.
t3~ 0.000
-0.025
-0.050
0
.... I .
1/2=
. .
U . .
3/2~ 2~
When the viscoelastic phase lag ~5is imposed on the stress profile c~(0), the
shifted stress profile 8(0) is expressed as
From the strain profile e(0) and the phase-shifted stress profile 8(0), the
area of the hysteresis loop is calculated in each harmonic order. The sum of
each area corresponds to the density of energy dissipation in the toroidal el-
ement group. The energy dissipation is obtained from the product of energy
dissipation density and the volume V of the circular element. Therefore, by
applying Eqs 8 and 9 to Eq 4, the energy dissipation Ed is given by Eq 10.
The coefficient n in Eq 10 is necessary, because nth order harmonics exist n
times within the fundamental period:
E a = ~ [Tc.n. VA,~ A n s i n ( 4 ~ -
9 (y .
4)~ + 6n)] (10)
n=l
SHIDA ET AL. ON ROLLING RESISTANCE SIMULATION 91
where l is the element number, m is the component of the stress and strain
vector, n is the harmonic order, and nel is the total number of elements in
the tire section.
In this model, the proper phase lag 5 can be imposed in each of the six
components of the vector for the fiber-reinforced rubber. Also, frequency- and
strain amplitude-dependent materials can be treated by the appropriate phase
lag.
Traveling Distance
The traveling distance L per one rotation of the tire is calculated by
(13)
where p, ii, v, o-, b, and t denote mass density, velocity, virtual displacement,
stress, body force, and traction, respectively.
We assume that the dynamic response is steady state harmonic vibration,
so that we can rewrite the principle of virtual work as
too,1
_~2~Lv,v,,j{U')d~+~ 0v' 0v"l[~'' -D"]~ 0x ~d~
LOx -b-]-xJ D, j/ou,,/
L OxJ
(14)
v J{bb}d + Lv v J{t}dF
t t
where ' and" denote the real and imaginary parts of a vector, respectively.
In the homogenization method, it is usually assumed that the composite
material is locally formed by the spatial repetition of unit cells, which are very
small microstructures in comparison with the overall macroscopic dimensions
of the structure. Let x be a macroscopic description of a structural body and
let y be a microscopic description of a unit cell. The microscopic level y is
expressed as
x
Y = -~7 (15)
where ~7is the ratio between the macroscopic level and the microscopic level.
It is reasonable to assume that the complex displacement can be expressed
as an asymptotic expansion with respect to the parameter q, namely,
x
u ~* = u ~ + ~ul*(x,y) + ... y - (16)
f ox__L]
fy Ov' Ov"[[D' -D"] Oy~dY= f]Ov' 0v"l~_D,,)dY
D'
L Oy 7yJLD"
k 8yJ
SHIDA ET AL. ON ROLLING RESISTANCE SIMULATION 93
b n' ] t'
L-~-x J
where X is a characteristic function of the microstructure. Furthermore, the
following parameters,
p~= iF]
1 fr pdY
= eLI (
Irr n, - D' ~
-~y
- n" Ox"~ ] d r
Oy )J
,,
bn,= 1
]YI fy b'dY
and
bm, = IYI
1 fy b"dr
I ' ' ' ' ' I ' ' ' ' ' I ' ' ' ' ' I
0.20
-" Homogenization
o Experiment
t- o "',, ,,,,,,, -..... Law of mixture ]
t-
0.15
Ip
1/1
.9o
t-
0.10
._>
C3r x
LL!
0.05
I ~ ~ ~ , I , , , , , I . . . . . I
FIG. 7 - - Comparison of calculated equivalent loss tangent using homogenization and experi-
mental results.
ment model used for computing the equivalent loss tangent. The tan 6L and
tan 6r ill Fig. 8 indicate equivalent loss tangents in the longitudinal and the
transverse directions, respectively. The ratio of the fiber modulus Ej to matrix
modulus Er is also changed parametrically. When the ratio ET/Eris increased
to 10 3, it is observed that the equivalent loss tangent in the longitudinal di-
rection can be approximated by the loss tangent of the fiber, and the equivalent
loss tangent in the transverse direction can be approximated by the loss tangent
of the rubber materials.
I ' ' ' ' I ' " ' ~ I ' ' ' ' I ' ' ' " I
=I.-,
/ tan~T(Ef/Er=101)
i-
/ / tan~-r(Ef/Er=102)
t.- / / ~ tanST(EJEr=l03)
1.00 11--: 4 - - o .... .
~)
0
e-- :\ .. ,,
,, ,
N
= 0.50
E
Z
o \-- tan~,(E#E,=102)
tan~L(EJEr=l 03)
I , , , , l , , ~ , l , , I I ] l i i ~ l
FIG. 8 - - Equivalent loss tangent of fiber-reinforced rubber as a function of fiber volume fraction.
other direction, because the modulus ratio of fiber to matrix is very large ( 103-
105) in the case of the usual fiber-reinforced rubber in tires. A computation
time of 1 - 2 min per case is needed to calculate the rolling resistance on a
SUN SPARCstation 20 after the finite element analysis has been conducted.
The rolling resistance experiment is performed on an indoor drum testing
machine, with an outer diameter of 1707 mm, and the ambient temperature is
maintained at 25 + 2~ The rolling resistance is measured at a velocity of 80
km/h, after a 25-rain warm-up.
Table 2 summarizes the tire size and inflation pressure as well as load, for
the comparison between calculation and experiment. Figure 10 shows the re-
lationship between the calculated rolling resistance and experimental results.
The computational results agree well qualitatively with experimental data. The
correlation coefficient between calculation and experiment is 0.949.
shows the contour plot of the calculated energy dissipation density. The large
energy is dissipated in the tread cap region, especially at the belt edge and
shoulder regions, because the loss factor of the tread cap rubber is large com-
pared with other regions. The very large energy dissipation at the belt edge
region is due to the generation of extremely large interlaminar shear strains.
TABLE 2 - - List of tire sizes, inflation pressures, and load conditions used for calculations and experiments.
i
Inflation Pressure
Tire (kPa) Load (kN)
Different constructions.
98 TIRE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
40.0 ' ' ' I ' ' ' ' I ' ' ' ' l ' ' ; '
i n a J I i n n
0.0
0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0
Experimental rolling resistance [N]
The large energy dissipation at the shoulder region indicates that the triaxial
compressive stress is generated in the region near the contact area in the cir-
cumferential, radial, and normal directions. Finally, the large energy dissipa-
tion in the upper portion of the bead apex is due to the compressive stress in
the radial direction as well as shear strains.
)<
Conclusion
9 Calculation
- - Experiment
0
e'-
1.5
1--
1.0
0
0.5
o Tire: 175/70R 13
z Load=2.94 kN
I i I I I I I I I ] I I I I ] I I I I
0.0
100 200 300 400
Inflation pressure [kPa]
9 Calculation
O
r
1.5
1.0
"0
._N
m
0.5
O Tire: 175/70R 13
Z
I.P.=200 kPa
I I I I I I I i I ] I I I I ] I I I r
0.0
1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0
Vertical load [kN]
9 Calculation
O - - Empirical curve
O
t--
1.1
.on
1.0
0
.N_
0.9
O Tire:175/70R13
z I.P.=200 kPa
Load=2.94 kN
8 ,I ,I ,I ,I I ,I ,I ,I ,I I ,I ,I ,| ,I I ,I ,I ,I ,
Cap tread a
Belt
i , 9 v . | ,,,,|,
[] 174.7 mm
Carcass
Side tread
Tire: 175/70R 13
~, I.P.=200 kPa
Lower side b Load=2.94 kN
, , I I I , I , I . . . . I . . . .
Calculation
- - Empirical curve
(..}
t-
1.1
09
C~ / / e
t,-
1.0 J
/
@
N
0.9
O Tire: 175/70 R 13 /Ht//
Z I.P.=200 kPa
Load=2,94 kN bead apex height
l , ~ , I I , , l I , t , l I , r , ,
0,8
20 30 40 50 60
Bead apex height [mm]
Cap tread a
Bead-apex height
Belt
26 mm
9 38 mm
51 mm
Carcass
Side tread
--~ Tire: 175/70 R 13
k I.P.=200 kPa
Lower side b Load=2.94 kN
9 Calculation
(1)
(3
1.1
.(n
c-
1.0 =
CO
0.9
o Tire:175/70R13
Z I.P.=200 kPa
Load=2.94 kN
0.8 '
Cap tread a
Tread radias
Belt
[] 260 mm
9 380 mm
[] 580 mm
Carcass
Side tread
Tire:175/70R13
~, I.P.=200 kPa
Lower side b Load=2.94 kN
References
[1] Kobayashi, Y., Fukuda, M., Takagi, A., Kanetsuki, M., Matsuzawa, F., and Kabe, K., "Tech-
nique for Estimating Tire Rolling Resistance Using Finite Element Method," Transactions of
the Society of Automotive Engineers of Japan, No. 35, 1987, pp. 140-146, in Japanese.
[2] Warholic, T. C., "Tire Rolling Loss Prediction form the Finite Element Analysis of a Statically
Loaded Tire," M.S.E. Thesis, University of Akron, 1987.
[3] Luchini, J. R., Peters, J. M., and Arthur, R. H., "Tire Rolling Computation with the Finite
EIement Method," Tire Science and Technology, TSTCA, Vol. 22, No. 4, October-December
1994, pp. 206-222.
[4] Park, H. C., Youn, S.-K., Song, T. S., and Kim, N.-J., "Analysis of Temperature Distribution
in a Rolling Tire Due to Strain Energy Dissipation," Tire Science and Technology, TSTCA,
Vol. 25, No. 3, July-September, 1997, pp. 214-228.
[5] McAllen, J., Cuitino, A. M., and Semas, V., "Numerical Investigation of the Deformation
Characteristics and Heat Generation in Pneumatic Aircraft Tires, Part lI. Thermal Modeling,"
Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, Vol. 23, 1996, pp. 265-290.
[6] Lions, J. L., Some Methods in the Mathematical Analysis of Systems and Their Control 1981,
Science Press.
[;7] Koishi, M., "Analysis of Rubber-Based Composite Materials Using Homogenization
Method," Doctoral dissertation, 1998, Yokohama National University, in Japanese.