Cognitive Psychology CIA 2

Under the guidance of Professor Soumya Jacob

POOJA BARUA

2339461

2MPCL B
 Introduction

Memory tests in psychology are assessments designed to evaluate an individual's ability to

encode, store, retain, and retrieve information. These tests can vary widely in their

complexity, focusing on different aspects of memory such as short-term memory, long-term

memory, working memory, and episodic memory. Here are some common types of memory

tests. Memory tests evaluate short and medium-term memory capacity, serving to detect

potential memory loss and associated diseases. It's crucial to determine memory capacity

before engaging in memory exercises that aid in recovery

Short-Term Memory Tests:

• Digit Span Test: Participants are read a series of numbers and asked to recall them in

the same order.

• Letter-Number Sequencing: Individuals are given a mixed sequence of letters and

numbers and must recall the numbers in ascending order followed by the letters in

alphabetical order.

Long-Term Memory Tests:

• Free Recall: Participants are prompted to remember and recall as many items from a

list as possible, without a specific order.

• Cued Recall: Similar to free recall, participants are provided with cues or hints (like

category names or initial letters) to aid in remembering and recalling items.

• Recognition: Participants are shown a set of items and must identify which ones they

have encountered before from a larger set.

Working Memory Tests:

word of each sentence in the order presented.

• Operation Span Test: Participants solve simple math problems while also trying to

remember unrelated words presented to them.

Episodic Memory Tests:

• Remember/Know Paradigm: Participants indicate whether they remember specific

details of an event (remember) or if they simply know they have encountered it before

(know).

• Autobiographical Memory Interview: This structured interview assesses an

individual's memory for events and experiences in their own life.

Other Memory Tests:

• Spatial Memory Tests: These tests evaluate an individual's ability to remember

locations and spatial layouts.

• Source Memory Tests: Participants are asked to recall the context or source of

information (e.g., where they learned a particular fact).

• Implicit Memory Tests: These tests measure memory without conscious awareness,

often using tasks such as word completion or priming.

These tests are essential for diagnosing memory disorders, understanding the mechanisms

of memory, and evaluating the effectiveness of memory improvement methods. It's crucial to

recognize that memory is a multifaceted cognitive function, and these tests assess various

aspects of memory performance.

The Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) is a neuropsychological assessment

used to measure verbal memory in patients aged 16 and older. It helps assess the type and
severity of memory issues and can track changes in memory function over time. The test

follows a list-learning format: the patient listens to a list of 15 nouns and is then asked to

recall as many words as possible from that list. This free-recall process is repeated five times.

Following the fifth repetition, a second list called "List B" is presented in the same way, and

the patient is asked to recall as many words from List B as they can. After the interference

trial with List B, the patient is immediately asked to recall the words from List A, which they

heard five times earlier. Then, after a 15 minute delay, the patient is asked to recall the words

from List A again.

Methodology

The test was conducted upon 10 people between the age group 21-22 and was

conducted in a quiet and distraction-free testing environment. Initially the participant was

asked to sit comfortably and rapport was built. The participant was explained the purpose of

the test and the following instruction was given –

Trial 1 Instruction: "I am going to read a list of words. Listen carefully, for when I stop you

are to repeat back as many words as you can remember. It doesn't matter in what order you

repeat them, just try to remember as many as you can. Go ahead."

Trial 2-5 Instructions: "Now I am going to read the same words again, and once again, when I

stop, I want you to tell me as many words as you can remember, including words you said the

first time. It doesn't matter in what order you say them, just say as many words as you can

remember, whether or not you said them before. Go ahead."

List B Instruction: "Now I am going to read a second list of words. Listen carefully, for when

I stop you are to repeat back as many words as you can remember. It doesn't matter in what

order you repeat them, just try to remember as many as you can. Go ahead."
Trial 6 Instruction (without reading the list of words to the participant): Say, "Now tell me all

the words you can remember from the first list, the list I repeated a number of times. Go

ahead."

Ethical concerns

• Informed Consent

It was ensured that the participants understood the test, its procedures, and any associated

risks before they agreed to take part. Their participation was voluntary with informed

consent.

• Confidentiality

participants and their information were protected by using codes instead of names when

recording data. It was assured to them that their data would remain confidential.

• Voluntary Participation:

Participants were told that they were free to withdraw from the test at any time without facing

consequences.

• Avoiding Deception

Clear and honest information about the test's purpose, procedures, and any potential

outcomes were informed. It was assured that the data of the test would be used for academic

purposes only.

• Respect for Participants

Participants were treated with respect and dignity throughout the test. Actions or languages

that could be perceived as demeaning or disrespectful were avoided

Any discomfort or stress experienced by participants during the test were minimized

• Debriefing:

After the test, participants were provided with a debriefing session. They were made feel free

to ask any questions related to the test

Analysis

• Immediate Recall:

Immediate Recall scores are typically assessed after each of the five learning trials. The

scores for Immediate Recall were: 72, 57, 59, 51, 56, 65, 43, 61, 74, 74. The Highest Possible

Score with perfect recall in each trial would be 75. The average/ mean of these scores was

61.2. Median: 59 Standard Deviation: Approximately 10.43

The highest Possible score would be 75, making the perfect average 75.0. The average

immediate recall score of 59.8 is slightly above average, suggesting decent initial memory

ability for the list of words.

• Learning Recall

Learning recall scores were calculated by subtracting the scores of trial 1 by T trial 5. The

Scores were 6, 6, 6, 7, 3, 4, 5, 7, 1, 1. Mean: 61.2 Median: 59 Standard Deviation:

Approximately 10.43

The average of these scores were 4.6. For learning and recall the highest score would be 0,

denoting that the person was perfectly able to recall the list of words in both trial 1 and 5. An

average of 4.6 denotes an above average score for learning

Forgetting scores are assessed by subtracting the scores of trial 5 by delayed recall. The

Scores were -1, 0, 0, 1, -3, 0, 4, 0, 0, 0. Mean: 0.1

Median: 0. Standard Deviation: Approximately 1.76

The highest possible score would be 0, denoting no forgetfulness at all. The average of 0.1

indicates that the participants forgetfulness was marginal or almost nil. They remembered

everything correctly even after the delay of 15 mins

Table 1 - Scores

Name Immediate Learning Forgetting

Recall Recall

A 72 6 -1

B 57 6 0

C 59 6 0

D 51 7 1

E 56 3 -3

F 65 4 0

G 43 5 4

H 61 7 0

I 74 1 0

J 74 1 0
Table 1.2 – Measures of central tendency

Measures of Immediate Recall Learning Recall Forgetting

Central Tendency

Mean 61.2 4.6 0.1

Median 59 5 0

Standard Deviation 10.43 1.98 1.76

Discussion

Immediate recall

The mean immediate recall score of 61.2 indicates that, on average, participants in this group

are able to remember approximately 61.2% of the words from the list immediately after

hearing them.

The median immediate recall score of 59 suggests that the middle value of the scores falls at

59, indicating a central tendency around this value.

The standard deviation of approximately 10.43 indicates a moderate amount of variability in

immediate recall scores among the participants.

This suggests that while the average performance in immediate recall is around 61.2%, there

is some variation in individual abilities, with some participants recalling more words and

others fewer.

Learning:
The mean learning score of 4.6 indicates that, on average, participants were able to learn and

recall about 4.6 words from the list across the five learning trials.

The median learning score of 5 suggests that the middle value of the learning scores is 5,

showing a central tendency around this value.

The standard deviation of approximately 1.98 indicates relatively low variability in learning

scores among the participants.

Review of Literature

Recent studies have found that the Rey Auditory-Verbal Learning Test Trial V

(RAVLT-V) score is not only a marker of verbal learning abilities but also serves as a

sensitive indicator of overall cognitive functioning (Callahan & Johnstone, 1994). A study by

Callahan and Johnstone focused on its concurrent validity compared to other commonly used

neuropsychological measures in a group of 64 outpatients diagnosed with traumatic brain

injury (TBI). The majority of the sample was male (77%), white (97%), with an average age

of 31.4±11.5 years, high school educated, and an average of 53 months post-injury.Using

stepwise multiple regression analysis, researchers identified a three-variable model that

explained 61% of the variance in RAVLT-V scores. This model included gender, Wechsler

Memory Scale-Revised Delayed Memory Index, and Trail making Part B (time). These

results indicate that in TBI patients, the RAVLT not only assesses specific verbal learning and

memory but also broader cognitive functions.The study concludes that the RAVLT is valuable

in medical rehabilitation settings due to its sensitivity to diffuse neuropsychological changes.

Additionally, its ease and speed of administration make it a practical tool for assessing

cognitive functioning in TBI patients

working, especially in figuring out if someone might have Alzheimer's disease (Schoenberg,

M., et al, 2006). The study done looked at how these groups of people performed on different

parts of the RAVLT, such as remembering lists of words right away, remembering them after

a short delay, and recognizing the words later on. They found that the RAVLT was

particularly good at telling the difference between patients suspected of having Alzheimer's

disease and those with psychiatric issues.

The Rey's Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) is a widely used tool in

neuropsychology to assess episodic memory, often used in dementia and pre-dementia

conditions. Moradi, E., et al in 2016 aimed to understand how RAVLT scores (specifically

RAVLT Immediate and RAVLT Percent Forgetting) relate to the structural brain changes seen

in AD. They used machine learning techniques to predict RAVLT scores based on structural

MRI data and identify key brain regions associated with these scores. The most important

brain regions for predicting RAVLT scores were found to be the medial temporal lobe

structures and amygdala for RAVLT Immediate, and the angular gyrus, hippocampus, and

amygdala for RAVLT Percent Forgetting. In essence, this study demonstrates that machine

learning models using structural MRI data can accurately predict RAVLT scores, providing

insights into the brain regions crucial for episodic memory. RAVLT measures are sensitive to

differentiate conversion from Mild cognitive Impairment to dementia (Dawidowicz, L., et al

2020)

RAVLT norms based on the WAFSS (Western Australian Family Study of

Schizophrenia) data for have provided valuable insights on individuals with schizophrenia or

related disorders. These norms can aid clinicians in interpreting RAVLT scores for patients

with similar diagnoses, highlighting the significant memory deficits often observed in

schizophrenia, independent of IQ, age, and sex. (Badcock, J., et al, 2011)
 There also is a long term impact childhood TBI on neuropsychological functions, with

verbal function being particularly affected. It underscores the need for ongoing support and

tailored interventions for individuals with childhood TBI, taking into account the severity of

the injury. (Horneman & Emanuelson, 2009)

Timing is also an important factor when conducting RAVLT, younger adults generally

performed better than older adults on most RAVLT measures (Lehmann, C., et al 2012)

Compare and Contrast

Some of the other tests that are similar to Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test are – California

Verbal Learning Test and Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (HVLT)

The Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) and the California Verbal Learning Test

(CVLT) are both widely used neuropsychological tests designed to assess verbal learning and

memory. While they share similarities in their objectives, they also have distinct differences

in their administration, scoring, and interpretation.

Similarities:

• Both tests assess verbal learning and memory by presenting a list of words for recall.

• They provide measures of immediate recall, delayed recall, and recognition memory.

• Used in various clinical settings to evaluate cognitive functioning.

Differences:

RAVLT Uses a fixed list of 15 words across five learning trials and Includes a delayed recall

trial after a distractor task whereas CVLT Includes multiple lists of words with semantic
categories. Each list has learning, free recall, cued recall, and recognition trials. RAVLT

Utilizes a consistent list of 15 unrelated words whereas CVLT Employs multiple lists with

different semantic categories. RAVLT Scores are based on total words recalled and include

measures of primacy and recency effects whereas CVLT Provides measures like free recall,

cued recall, and recognition memory. RAVLT Emphasizes immediate recall, providing insight

into quick encoding and retrieval whereas CVLT Focuses on semantic clustering and

organization, offering a more detailed assessment of memory processes.

RAVLT's initial learning trials could serve as an efficient substitute for the CVLT-II in

detecting verbal learning impairments in individuals with multiple sclerosis, providing a

valuable and cost-effective screening option (Beier at al, 2019)

RAVLT holds certain advantages over CLVT which are

• Simplicity and Efficiency: RAVLT is straightforward with a single word list, quicker

to administer, and more cost-effective.

• Sensitivity to Immediate Recall: AVLT's focus on immediate recall offers insight into

rapid information processing.

• Versatility: RAVLT's streamlined process makes it versatile for various populations

and settings.

Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (HVLT)

The Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (HVLT) and the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test

(RAVLT) are both widely used neuropsychological tests designed to assess verbal learning

and memory. While they have similar objectives, they also have distinct differences in their

administration, scoring, and interpretation.

Similarities:
 • Both tests assess verbal learning and memory by presenting a list of words for recall.

• They provide measures of immediate recall, delayed recall, and recognition memory.

• Used in various clinical settings to evaluate cognitive functioning.

Differences:

HVLT: Uses a list of 12 words across three learning trials. Includes a delayed recall

trial after a distractor task whereas RAVLT: Uses a fixed list of 15 words across five learning

trials it also includes a delayed recall trial after a distractor task. HVLT: Utilizes a list of 12

semantically related words whereas RAVLT: Employs a consistent list of 15 unrelated words.

HVLT: Scores are based on total words recalled and measures of semantic clustering whereas

RAVLT: Scores are based on total words recalled and measures of primacy and recency

effects. HVLT: Focuses on semantic clustering, providing insight into organization strategies

whereas RAVLT: Emphasizes immediate recall, offering insight into rapid information

processing.

Advantages of RAVLT over HVLT:

• Primacy and Recency Effects: RAVLT's inclusion of primacy and recency effects

offers insights into memory patterns.

• Versatility: RAVLT's fixed list of unrelated words makes it versatile for various

populations and settings.

Conclusion

In conclusion, memory tests are crucial tools in psychology and clinical settings,

helping to assess an individual's ability to encode, store, retain, and retrieve information.
Various types of memory tests, such as short-term, long-term, working memory, and episodic

memory tests, serve different purposes and provide insights into different aspects of memory

functioning.

The Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) is a widely used neuropsychological

assessment tool for measuring verbal memory in individuals aged 16 and older. It has been

extensively studied in different populations and settings, highlighting its effectiveness in

assessing verbal learning and memory abilities.

The RAVLT is particularly valuable in medical rehabilitation settings, such as

traumatic brain injury (TBI), Alzheimer's disease (AD), schizophrenia, and cognitive aging

research. Studies have shown its sensitivity to detect verbal memory deficits, its ability to

predict cognitive decline, and its utility in differentiating between various cognitive

conditions. Additionally, the RAVLT's simplicity, efficiency, and versatility make it a

practical choice for clinicians and researchers.

Comparing the RAVLT to other memory tests, such as the California Verbal Learning

Test (CVLT) and Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (HVLT), reveals its unique features and

advantages. While the CVLT offers detailed measures of semantic clustering and

organization, the RAVLT focuses on immediate recall and provides insights into rapid

information processing. The HVLT, on the other hand, emphasizes semantic clustering,

providing a different perspective on memory functioning.

In summary, the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) is a valuable and

versatile tool for assessing verbal learning and memory across various populations and

settings. Its effectiveness, simplicity, and ability to capture key memory processes make it a

cornerstone in cognitive assessment and research. As we continue to explore memory

and diagnosing memory-related conditions.

References

Badcock, Johanna C, et al. “Normative Data for Rey’s Auditory Verbal Learning Test in

Individuals with Schizophrenia.” Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, vol. 26, no.

3, 9 Feb. 2011, pp. 205–213, academic.oup.com/acn/article/26/3/205/3966,

https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acr005

Beier, Meghan, et al. “Brief and Cost-Effective Tool for Assessing Verbal Learning in

Multiple Sclerosis: Comparison of the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT)

to the California Verbal Learning Test – II (CVLT-II).” Journal of the Neurological

Sciences, vol. 400, 1 May 2019, pp. 104–109,

www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0022510X1930142X,

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2019.03.016

---. “Brief and Cost-Effective Tool for Assessing Verbal Learning in Multiple Sclerosis:

Comparison of the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT) to the California

Verbal Learning Test – II (CVLT-II).” Journal of the Neurological Sciences, vol. 400,

1 May 2019, pp. 104–109,

www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0022510X1930142X,

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2019.03.016

Callahan, Charles D, and Brick Johnstone. “The Clinical Utility of the Rey Auditory-Verbal

Learning Test in Medical Rehabilitation.” Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24227393/, https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01989627

“Can the RAVLT Predict Deterioration from MCI to Dementia? Data from Long Term

Follow Up.” Experimental Aging Research, 2021,

www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0361073X.2021.1898182. Accessed 15 Mar.

2024.

“Cognitive Outcome in Children and Young Adults Who Sustained Severe and Moderate

Traumatic Brain Injury 10 Years Earlier.” Brain Injury, 2024,

www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02699050903283239

Lehmann, Claire A, et al. “Age and Synchrony Effects in Performance on the Rey Auditory

Verbal Learning Test.” International Psychogeriatrics, vol. 25, no. 4, 12 Dec. 2012,

pp. 657–665, www.cambridge.org/core/journals/international-

psychogeriatrics/article/abs/age-and-synchrony-effects-in-performance-on-the-rey-

auditory-verbal-learning-test/CDD49840C501AA403721E1CBCD144665,

https://doi.org/10.1017/s1041610212002013.

“Memory Test: What Are They, Why and Preparation | Top Doctors.” Top Doctors, 26 Feb.

2014, www.topdoctors.co.uk/medical-dictionary/memory-

test#:~:text=What%20is%20a%20memory%20test,memory%20exercises%20that%2

0help%20recovery.

Moradi, Elaheh, et al. “Rey’s Auditory Verbal Learning Test Scores Can Be Predicted from

Whole Brain MRI in Alzheimer’s Disease.” NeuroImage: Clinical, vol. 13, 1 Jan.

2017, pp. 415–427, www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213158216302480,

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2016.12.011.

Schoenberg, Mike R, et al. “Test Performance and Classification Statistics for the Rey

Auditory Verbal Learning Test in Selected Clinical Samples.” Archives of Clinical

academic.oup.com/acn/article/21/7/693/2816,

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acn.2006.06.010.