Understanding and Elimination of Process Defects I
Understanding and Elimination of Process Defects I
DOI 10.1007/s00170-016-8929-1
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Received: 18 December 2015 / Accepted: 12 May 2016 / Published online: 24 May 2016
# The Author(s) 2016. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com
C Si Mn P S Cr Ni Mo Cu
Steel 0.14 0.04 0.85 0.016 0.01 0.014 0.011 0.001 0.008
Wire 0.10 0.20 1.14 0.006 0.005 0.03 0.88 0.25 0.075
laser spot was 6 mm on the target surface. The various 3 Results and discussion
laser heat input investigated ranged from 0.9 to 1.2 kJ/
mm. The laser-wire over lapping was varied from 1 to 3.1 Factors affecting the welding quality
5 mm. The wire feed rate was varied from 4 to 6 m/
min. The various welding velocities ranged from 0.3 to 3.1.1 Effect of laser heat input on crack formation
0.5 m/min.
The welded specimen cross-sections were polished and The cross-sectional weld bead profiles for welded joints
etched using a solution of a mixture of 5 ml nitric acid and with different laser heat input are shown in Fig. 6. It
95 ml ethanol. Microscopic examination was carried out using can be seen that there were 2.3 mm deep longitudinal
a KEYENCE VHX-500 F optical microscope and a Hitachi surface cracks in the welded joint when the laser heat
S3000N model scanning electron microscope (SEM). input was 0.9 kJ/mm (Fig. 6a). However, when the heat
Microhardness of the welded joint was measured using an input increased to 1.05 kJ/mm, the length of the longi-
automatic Vickers microhardness machine with a load of tudinal surface cracks decreased to 0.8 mm. A welded
3 kg and a dwell period of 10 s. joint without cracks was achieved when the laser heat
Full-size transverse tensile specimens with and with- input reached 1.2 kJ/mm (Fig. 6b). This is because that
out notch were machined from the welded joint laser welding is associated with relatively high cooling
(Fig. 5a, c), for tensile strength testing, on a WE- rates, which results in increased risks for cracking when
1000B tensile machine with 1 mm/min crossbeam compared with arc welding techniques. With a higher
Fig. 5 Schematic of sampling location: a transverse tensile specimens, b longitudinal tensile specimens, dimensions of: c transverse tensile specimen
and d longitudinal tensile specimen
Fig. 6 Effect of the laser heat input on multi-pass laser welding with filler
wire addition: a 0.9 kJ/mm, b 1.05 kJ/mm, and c 1.2 kJ/mm Fig. 8 Effect of the shielding gas method on multi-pass laser welding
with filler wire addition: a 5 mm diameter tube inside groove and b
laser heat input the cooling rate of the weld pool could 15 mm diameter tube on the top of the groove
be reduced resulting in fewer risks for cracking.
was 3 mm, the molten metal did not contact with the weld
pool and it could not be transferred to the weld pool directly,
3.1.2 Effect of laser-wire overlapping on side wall fusion while it dropped to the weld pool, which would cause lack of
and spatter sidewall fusion. When the overlapping increased to 5 mm,
spatter was found on the sidewall of the groove by the molten
Figure 7 shows the cross sectional weld bead profiles for metal as the molten metal on the tip of the wire was far away
welded joints with different laser-wire overlapping. It can be from the weld pool, resulting in less deposited metal on the
seen that when the overlapping was 1 mm, the welded joint welded joint.
without lack of sidewall fusion and spatters was obtained.
However, when the overlapping was 3 mm, lack of sidewall
fusion (arrow) was formed in the welded joint. For the over- 3.1.3 Effect of shielding gas method on porosity formation
lapping of 5 mm, overlap (circle) was formed on the sidewall
of the welded groove. This is because that molten metal was The weld bead profiles for welded joints with different
formed on the tip of the feeding wire by absorbing part of the shielding gas method are shown in Fig. 8. It can be
laser energy. When the overlapping was 1 mm, the molten seen that there was large-scale porosity (arrow) in the
metal contacted with the weld pool and it was transferred to welded joint when the shielding gas was delivered by a
the weld pool and spread. However, when the overlapping 3-mm diameter tube inside the weld groove (Fig. 8a).
However, when the shielding gas was delivered by a
15-mm diameter tube on the top of the weld groove, a
welded joint without porosity was achieved (Fig. 8b).
This is because that the shielding gas flow velocity
Fig. 7 Effect of the laser-wire overlapping on multi-pass laser welding Fig. 9 Effect of the feed rate of wire on multi-pass laser welding with
with filler wire addition: a 1 mm, b 3 mm, and c 5 mm filler wire addition: a 4 m/min, b 5 m/min and, c 6 m/min
was too high when the diameter of the tube was too
small, creating turbulence. When the shielding gas
flowed very gently from the top of the weld groove,
the weld groove was filled with shielding gas, which
can prevent oxygen and air coming into the weld pool.
The weld bead profiles for welded joints with different feed
rates for the filler wire are shown in Fig. 9. It can be seen that
when the feed rate of the wire increased from 4 to 6 m/min, the
number of weld passes decreased from 12 to 8. This is because
the depth for each filling pass in the welded joint increases
when the feed rate of the wire increases.
The optimized laser welding parameters are: laser heat in-
put 1.2 kJ/mm, laser-wire over lapping 1 mm, shielding gas Fig. 11 Stress-strain relationship of transverse tensile specimens of
fed from the top of the weld groove by 15 mm diameter tube in welded joint with and without notch
flow rate of 15 l/min, wire feed rate 5 to 6 m/min and welding
speed 0.3 to 0.4 m/min.
UTS of 490 MPa. For the 12 passes welded joint with
a notch, the YS and UTS are 480 and 550 MPa, respec-
3.2 X-ray non-destructive inspection tively, which are higher than those of 12 passes welded
joint without a notch having a YS of 350 MPa and a
The welds were examined by an engineering inspection UTS of 500 MPa. On the contrary, ductilities of the
and consultancy service company (RSA), who are qual- welded joints with a notch are lower than that of
ified to assess welds to ASME IX QW 191: 2013 re- welded joints without notch.
quirements. Their X-ray non-destructive inspection re- As the fracture morphology reflects the strength and
port stated that the welds were found to comply with ductility of tensile specimen, the representative
the acceptance ASME IX standard with no lack of side- fractographs of welded joint with and without a notch
wall fusion, but some limited and acceptable porosity. were analyzed, as shown in Figs. 12 and 13, respective-
The X-ray film is shown in Fig. 10. ly. Figure 12 shows the fracture path in the welded
specimens with a notch: the crack grows in the weld
3.3 Mechanical properties and fracture characteristics metal first and then propagates into the base metal
(Fig. 12a–c). Dimples and micro-voids are shown on
Two different types of specimens were prepared for the the fracture surface of the weld metal and the base
tensile testing. One type is with a notch in the fusion metal, which indicates that the specimens failed in a
zone to show the strengths of the welded area. The characteristic ductile fracture. This is because that the
other type is without a notch to mainly show the frac- ferrite-carbide microstructure of base metal fails in a
tures on the base metal. Figure 11 demonstrates the ductile mode with dimples initiated by granular car-
stress-strain relation curves of transverse tensile speci- bides, and that the martensite having a sufficient mobil-
mens of welded joints with and without notch in the ity of dislocations in the weld metal can also fracture in
weld metal. The figure shows that the fractures occurred ductile dimple mode. However, the sizes of the dimples
in the base metal in the welded specimens without are significantly different in these zones. As shown in
notch. For the 8 passes welded joint with a notch in Fig. 12d, small equiaxed dimples are shown on the
the weld zone, the yield strength (YS) and ultimate fracture surfaces of weld metal. In contrast, large dim-
tensile strength (UTS) were 490 and 580 MPa, respec- ples are usually linked by several smaller dimples on
tively, which are higher than those of 8 passes welded the fracture surface of base metal, as shown in
joint without notch having a YS of 350 MPa and a Fig. 12e. Figure 13 also shows that large dimples are
linked by several smaller dimples on the fracture surface
of the welded joint without a notch. Some researchers
reported that large dimples observed on the fracture sur-
face were consistent with reasonably high ductility,
Fig. 10 X-ray non-destructive inspection film while small equiaxed dimples were consistent with high
strength [18, 19]. Therefore, the strengths of welded 350 MPa and a UTS of 490 MPa (Fig. 14a). The clas-
joint with a notch increase, while the ductilities decrease sic Hall-Petch relationship has been used to describe the
compared with welded joint without a notch, which are relationship between the yield stress and grain size,
consistent with the results obtained in the tensile tests. through the expression
Longitudinal weld metal tensile specimens were com-
pared to those of base metal as for common transverse σy ¼ σ0 þ k y d −1=2 ð1Þ
tensile specimen, fractures occurred in the base metal
where σy is the yield stress, σ0 is the friction stress
instead of the weld metal, as shown in Fig. 14. J1,
needed to move individual dislocations, ky is a positive
J2, and J3 are 8 passes welded joints with laser power
constant of yielding associated with the stress required
of 7, 6.5, and 6 kW and with constant welding speed of
to extend dislocation activity into adjacent unyielded
0.3 m/min, wire feed rate of 6 m/min. The figure shows
grains, and d is the average grain size [20, 21]. This
that the YS and UTS of welded joint with laser power
relationship demonstrates that the yield strength of
of 7 kW are about 590 and 640 MPa, respectively
welded joint with smaller grain sizes is higher.
(Fig. 14b), while the YS and UTS of welded joint with
The stress-strain relation curves also show that the ductil-
laser power of 6.5 kW are about 630 and 700 MPa,
ities of the welded joints are lower than that of base metal,
respectively (Fig. 14c). Additionally, the YS and UTS
which means that post-weld heat treatment on the welded
of welded joint with a laser power of 6 kW were about
joints are required to reduce the strength of the welded joint
710 and 800 MPa, respectively (Fig. 14d), which are
while to increase the ductilities of the welded joints.
higher than those of base metal having a YS of
3.4 Microhardness
Fig. 14 Stress-strain relationship of longitudinal weld metal and base metal tensile specimens
treatment effect on the previous welding passes. The It can be seen that in the 1st pass, the microstructure in
average microhardness of the HAZ in the last pass the ICHAZ is composed of ferrite and tempered mar-
was maximum because it was the final filling pass and tensite (Fig. 16a). The microstructures in the FGHAZ,
so there was no tempering effect on it associated with CGHAZ, and FZ are composed of tempered martensite
subsequent welding passes. (Fig. 16b, c, and d). For the 6th pass, the microstructure
in the ICHAZ is also composed of ferrite and tempered
3.5 Microstructure martensite (Fig. 17a). The microstructures in the
FGHAZ and CGHAZ consist of tempered martensite
Figures 16, 17 and 18 show the weld bead profiles and (Fig. 17b and c), but the martensites are not significant-
the microstructures of the 1st pass, 6th pass and the ly decomposed into ferrite and carbides when compared
13th pass in the welded joint with multi-pass welding. with those in the 1st pass. The microstructure in the FZ
Fig. 15 Microhardness 2D
contour map of a welded joint
welding methods for the ITER vacuum vessel sectors. using a narrow gap joint configuration. J Mech Sci Technol 27:
Fusion Eng Des 69:215–220 2125–2131
11. Zhang XD, Ashida E, Tarasawa S, Anma Y, Okada M, 16. Zhou Z, Wu W, Wei J, Du S, Han S, Liu L, Yu X, Li H, Foussat A,
Katayama S, Mizutani M (2011) Welding of thick stainless Libeyre P (2012) Research on manufacture and enclosure welding
steel plates up to 50 mm with high brightness lasers. J Laser of ITER correction coils cases. IEEE Trans Appl Supercond 22:
Appl 23(022002):1–8 4202603
12. Elmesalamy A, Francis JA, Li L (2014) A comparison of 17. Jokinen T, Kujanpa¨a¨ V (2003) High power Nd:YAG laser
residual stresses in multi pass narrow gap laser welds and welding in manufacturing of vacuum vessel of fusion reac-
gas-tungsten arc welds in AISI 316L stainless steel. Int J tor. Fusion Eng Des 69:349–353
Press Vessel Pip 113:49–59 18. Cox TB, Low JR (1974) An investigation of the plastic fracture of
13. Guo W, Dong SY, Guo W, Francis JA, Li L (2015) AISI 4340 and 18 Nickel-200 grade maraging steels. Metall Trans
Microstructure and mechanical characteristics of a laser 5:1457–1470
welded joint in SA508 nuclear pressure vessel steel. Mater 19. He Y, Yang K, Sha W (2005) Microstructure and mechanical
Sci Eng A 625:65–80 properties of a 2000 MPa grade Co-free maraging steel.
14. Elmesalamy AS, Li L, Francis JA, Sezer HK (2013) Understanding Metall Mater Trans A 36:2273–2287
the process parameter interactions in multiple-pass ultra-narrow- 20. Valiev RZ, Langdon TG (2006) Principles of equal-channel
gap laser welding of thick-section stainless steels. Int J Adv angular pressing as a processing tool for grain refinement.
Manuf Technol 68:1–17 Prog Mater Sci 51:881–981
15. Yu YC, Yang SL, Yin Y, Wang CM, Hu XY, Meng XX, Yu SF 21. Masumura R, Hazzledine P, Pande C (1998) Yield stress of fine
(2014) Multi-pass laser welding of thick plate with filler wire by grained materials. Acta Mater 46:4527–4534
1. use such content for the purpose of providing other users with access on a regular or large scale basis or as a means to circumvent access
control;
2. use such content where to do so would be considered a criminal or statutory offence in any jurisdiction, or gives rise to civil liability, or is
otherwise unlawful;
3. falsely or misleadingly imply or suggest endorsement, approval , sponsorship, or association unless explicitly agreed to by Springer Nature in
writing;
4. use bots or other automated methods to access the content or redirect messages
5. override any security feature or exclusionary protocol; or
6. share the content in order to create substitute for Springer Nature products or services or a systematic database of Springer Nature journal
content.
In line with the restriction against commercial use, Springer Nature does not permit the creation of a product or service that creates revenue,
royalties, rent or income from our content or its inclusion as part of a paid for service or for other commercial gain. Springer Nature journal
content cannot be used for inter-library loans and librarians may not upload Springer Nature journal content on a large scale into their, or any
other, institutional repository.
These terms of use are reviewed regularly and may be amended at any time. Springer Nature is not obligated to publish any information or
content on this website and may remove it or features or functionality at our sole discretion, at any time with or without notice. Springer Nature
may revoke this licence to you at any time and remove access to any copies of the Springer Nature journal content which have been saved.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, Springer Nature makes no warranties, representations or guarantees to Users, either express or implied
with respect to the Springer nature journal content and all parties disclaim and waive any implied warranties or warranties imposed by law,
including merchantability or fitness for any particular purpose.
Please note that these rights do not automatically extend to content, data or other material published by Springer Nature that may be licensed
from third parties.
If you would like to use or distribute our Springer Nature journal content to a wider audience or on a regular basis or in any other manner not
expressly permitted by these Terms, please contact Springer Nature at