0% found this document useful (0 votes)
17 views

The Finite Difference Formulation of Steady Two-Dimensional - Quizlet

The finite difference formulation for three-dimensional steady heat conduction with heat generation and constant thermal conductivity is presented. The relation is modified for the three-dimensional case by adding a third dimension index and another temperature index to account for variation in three dimensions.

Uploaded by

ashfaashraf9
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
17 views

The Finite Difference Formulation of Steady Two-Dimensional - Quizlet

The finite difference formulation for three-dimensional steady heat conduction with heat generation and constant thermal conductivity is presented. The relation is modified for the three-dimensional case by adding a third dimension index and another temperature index to account for variation in three dimensions.

Uploaded by

ashfaashraf9
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

1

Home Your library Expert Solutions Find it faster with a search Upgrade: free 7-day trial

Science Engineering AD

Question

The finite difference formulation of steady two-dimensional heat conduction in a medium with heat generation and
constant thermal conductivity is given by

Tm−1,n − 2Tm,n + Tm+1,n Tm,n−1 − 2Tm,n + Tm,n+1 ėm,n


2
+ 2
+ =0
Δx Δy k
in rectangular coordinates. Modify this relation for the three- dimensional case.

Solution Verified Answered 3 years ago

Step 1 1 of 2

To express the finite difference formulation for the three-dimensional case, we need to add the difference for the
third dimension, which is z , and another index to the temperature because it varies with three dimensions for this
problem.
.
Tm−1,n,p − 2Tm,n,p + Tm+1,n,p Tm,n−1,p − 2Tm,n,p + Tm,n+1,p Tm,n,p−1 − 2Tm,n,p + Tm,n,p+1 em,n,p
2
+ 2
+ 2
+ =
Δx Δy Δz k

Result 2 of 2

.
Tm−1,n,p − 2Tm,n,p + Tm+1,n,p Tm,n−1,p − 2Tm,n,p + Tm,n+1,p Tm,n,p−1 − 2Tm,n,p + Tm,n,p+1 em,n,p
2
+ 2
+ 2
+ =
Δx Δy Δz k

Rate this solution

Recommended textbook solutions

Heat and Mass Transfer: Fundamentals of Electric Circuits


Fundamentals and Applications 6th Edition • ISBN: 9780078028229 (2 more)
5th Edition • ISBN: 9780073398181 Charles Alexander, Matthew Sadiku
Yunus A. Cengel

2,646 solutions 2,120 solutions

Microelectronic Circuits Advanced Engineering Mathematics


7th Edition • ISBN: 9780199339136 10th Edition • ISBN: 9780470458365 (3 more)
Adel S. Sedra, Kenneth C. Smith Erwin Kreyszig

2,025 solutions 4,134 solutions

Related questions

Engineering Engineering

The diameter of a cylindrical boss is dimensioned 25 ± 0.2. A Two engineers are to solve an actual heat transfer problem in a
position control is used to control the basic location of the manufacturing facility. Engineer A makes the necessary
boss. Specify the diameters allowed for the position tolerance simplifying assumptions and solves the problem analytically,
zone if the boss is produced with diameters of 24.8, 25.0, and while engineer B solves it numerically using a powerful
25.2, for each of the following position tolerance Software package. Engineer A claims he solved the problem

Engineering Engineering

How do numerical Solution methods differ from analytical A copper rod 1/4 in. in diameter and 3-ft long runs between
ones? What are the advantages and disadvantages of two bus bars, which are at 60∘ F . The surrounding air is at 60

numerical and analytical methods? F , and the convective heat-transfer coefficient is Btu/h ft2 ∘ F
. Assuming the electrical resistivity of copper to be constant at
1 72 × 10 6 ohm cm determine the maximum current the

1/4

Privacy Terms English (USA)

You might also like