0% found this document useful (0 votes)
25 views18 pages

Final Project

Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
25 views18 pages

Final Project

Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 18

Human Bite Mark

Identification using
ML Technique
Under the guidance
Dr. SAVITHA C K
Dept. of CSE 1
KVGCE, Sullia
TEAM MEMBERS

DISHA G K KARTHIK
4KV20CS015 4KV20CS019
SOFTWARE TESTING FRONT-END DEVELOPER

SACHIN M T SAPTHAMI C G
4KV20CS042 4KV20CS044
BACK-END DEVELOPER BACK-END DEVELOPER

2
AGENDA

Introduction
Literature Survey
Methodology
Snapshot
Application
Conclusion
3
References
Introduction
4
INTRODUCTION

The main aim is to automate the process of identifying human bite


marks, crucial in forensic and dental investigations.
Human bite marks are unique identifiers like fingerprints.
However, their identification relies on time-consuming and subjective
expert analysis.
Automation reduces time and subjectivity in analysis.
Machine learning techniques offer a promising avenue for automation.

5
Literature
Survey
4
AUTHOR NAME TITLE YEAR METHODOLOGY

Utilizing
Bite Artificial Neural Networks (ANN)
P. M. Mahasantipiya, U.
Mark Identification Using Neural with 34 specific features extracted
Yeesarapat et al
Networks from
[1]
bite marks on pink wax.

Feature Extraction Of Identical


Human Comparing techniques like SIFT,
Dr. Chandramouleeswaran et al
Bite Mark Images Using Machine SURF,
[2]
Learning And Deep Neural ORB, KAZE, BRISK, AKAZE, and
Network Graph Neural Networks (GNNs).
Methodology
7
Fig 1 : Flowchart
SNAPSHOTS
SNAPSHOTS

9
APPLICATIONS
APPLICATIONS
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSION

Problem Statement:
Figuring out who made a bite mark, relying only on people's opinions can
lead to mistakes.

Solution:
We used computers to help us figure out who made a bite mark. These
computers learned from lots of examples and got really good at it, reaching
a super high accuracy of 96%.

10
FUTURE
ENHANCEMENT
FUTURE ENHANCEMENT

11
Thank you!

You might also like