Logbook 2
Logbook 2
600020
Tamil Nadu, India
LOGBOOK
DNB Palliative Medicine
CERTIFICATE
Name of PG Teacher:
_________________________________________________________
Signature of PG teacher:
_________________________________________________________
Dated__________________________
PERSONAL DETAILS
PHOTO
1.Full Name (Surname, first name, middle name):
______________________________________________
3.Age:
_________________________________________________________
6.E-mail id:
_________________________________________________________
7.MBBS Degree:
a. Year of passing:
_________________________________________________________
b. College:
___________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________
c. University:
___________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________
d. Distinction/Prizes/Medals/Scholarships etc.,
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
_________________
8.Internship:
a. Month/year of beginning:
_________________________________________________________
b. Month/year of completion:
_________________________________________________________
11.Name of PG teacher:
_________________________________________________________
4 Excellent (70-19%)
3 Good (60-69%)
2 Average (50-59%)
SL PARTICULARS
NO
From- To
1 Punctuality and Reliability (5%)
2 Dependability (5%)
3 Quality of Work (10%)
4 Bedside manners (10%)
5 Patient Interaction/
Counselling (5%)
6 Case workup (10%)
7 Systematic reporting/
Presentation (5%)
8 Case follow-up (5%)
9 Documentation (5%)
10 Team work/ Interpersonal skills
(5%)
11 Attire and self-presentation
(5%)
12 Knowledge and preparedness
(10%)
13 Application of knowledge (5%)
14 Procedure skill (5%)
15 Teaching initiatives/ skills (5%)
16 Research interest/ initiatives
(5%)
NET SCORE (100%)
4 Excellent (70-19%)
3 Good (60-69%)
2 Average (50-59%)
SL PARTICULARS
NO
From- To
1 Punctuality and Reliability (5%)
2 Dependability (5%)
3 Quality of Work (10%)
4 Bedside manners (10%)
5 Patient Interaction/
Counselling (5%)
6 Case workup (10%)
7 Systematic reporting/
Presentation (5%)
8 Case follow-up (5%)
9 Documentation (5%)
10 Teamwork/ Interpersonal skills
(5%)
11 Attire and self-presentation
(5%)
12 Knowledge and preparedness
(10%)
13 Application of knowledge (5%)
14 Procedure skill (5%)
15 Teaching initiatives/ skills (5%)
16 Research interest/ initiatives
(5%)
NET SCORE (100%)
4 Excellent (70-19%)
3 Good (60-69%)
2 Average (50-59%)
SL PARTICULARS
NO
From- To
1 Punctuality and Reliability (5%)
2 Dependability (5%)
3 Quality of Work (10%)
4 Bedside manners (10%)
5 Patient Interaction/
Counselling (5%)
6 Case workup (10%)
7 Systematic reporting/
Presentation (5%)
8 Case follow-up (5%)
9 Documentation (5%)
10 Team work/ Interpersonal skills
(5%)
11 Attire and self-presentation
(5%)
12 Knowledge and preparedness
(10%)
13 Application of knowledge (5%)
14 Procedure skill (5%)
15 Teaching initiatives/ skills (5%)
16 Research interest/ initiatives
(5%)
NET SCORE (100%)
4 Excellent (70-19%)
3 Good (60-69%)
2 Average (50-59%)
SL PARTICULARS
NO
From- To
1 Punctuality and Reliability (5%)
2 Dependability (5%)
3 Quality of Work (10%)
4 Bedside manners (10%)
5 Patient Interaction/
Counselling (5%)
6 Case workup (10%)
7 Systematic reporting/
Presentation (5%)
8 Case follow-up (5%)
9 Documentation (5%)
10 Team work/ Interpersonal skills
(5%)
11 Attire and self-presentation
(5%)
12 Knowledge and preparedness
(10%)
13 Application of knowledge (5%)
14 Procedure skill (5%)
15 Teaching initiatives/ skills (5%)
16 Research interest/ initiatives
(5%)
NET SCORE (100%)
4 Excellent (70-19%)
3 Good (60-69%)
2 Average (50-59%)
4 Excellent (70-19%)
3 Good (60-69%)
2 Average (50-59%)
Topic
Date
1. Article relevance (5%)
2. Article Authenticity (5%)
3. Explained study context and
background (5%)
4. Understood study
methodology (10%)
5. Understood statistical
analysis (5%)
6. Critically analysed the results
(10%)
7. Understood the study
limitations (10%)
8. Able to conclude (10%)
9. Cross references examined
(5%)
10. Answers audience questions
(10%)
11. Audience engagement (5%)
12. Presentation style (5%)
13. Clarity of presentation (5%)
14. Effectiveness (5%)
15. Audio-visual aids (5%)
Net score (100%)
Signature of the moderator
Grading system
Topic
Date
1. Comprehensive
presentation (10%)
2. Flow of presentation (5%)
3. Covers all the specific
subtopics (10%)
4. Depth of knowledge (5%)
5. Content authenticity (5%)
6. Evidence of extensive
search/research (10%)
7. Recent advances relevant
to seminar topic (5%)
8. Summarizes key learning
points (10%)
9. Time management (5%)
10. Answers audience
questions (5%)
11. Audience engagement
(10%)
12. Presentation style (5%)
13. Clarity of presentation
(5%)
14. Effectiveness (5%)
15. Audio- visual aids (5%)
Net score (100%)
Signature of the
moderator
Grading system
Topic
Date
1. Comprehensive history
(10%)
2. All relevant points elicited
(10%)
3. Logical order of
presentation (5%)
4. Clarity of presentation (5%)
5. Non-physical history elicited
comprehensively (5%)
6. General and systematic
examinations carried out
logically (10%)
7. All physical signs elicited
(10%)
8. Arrived at diagnosis
corroborating H & E (10%)
9. Differential diagnosis
provided (5%)
10. Able to defend the
diagnosis (5%)
11. Able to plan further
management (5%)
12. Able to answer questions
(5%)
13. Subject knowledge (5%)
14. Effectiveness (5%)
15. Time management (5%)
Net score (100%)
Signature of the
moderator
Grading system
Topic
Guide
Signature of the
Guide
Grading System
5 Outstanding (80% and above)
4 Excellent (70%-79%)
3 Good (60-69%)
2 Average (50-59%)
1 Below Average (40-49%)
Thesis progress 18 months after joining PG course
Sl.No Particulars Grade
1 Thesis protocol is complete
2 Clinical Record Form and Informed Consent is ready
3 Ethical board permission sought
4 Active patient recruitment has begun
Net Score
Grading System
5 Outstanding (80% and above)
4 Excellent (70%-79%)
3 Good (60-69%)
2 Average (50-59%)
1 Below Average (40-49%)
Record of (interesting) cases
Posting:
Outdoor patients/Indoor patients/ Emergency and hospice
____________________
Faculty’s signature
Log of patient related activities
Date Counseling/Home visit/Bereavement/Support group Care issues
meetings/DMGs addressed
___________________
Faculty’s signature
Record of procedures
Date Patient ID Setting Diagnosis Procedures
___________________
Faculty’s signature
Log of academic activities attended
Courses and educational meetings attended
Date Guest lecture/ CMEs/Conferences/Events/Courses/Teaching
activities/Symposia/Workshops
____________________
Faculty’s signature
Academic Activities – CI Faculty
Sl.No Date Topic Presenter Moderator
Academic Activities – CI Common PG Class
Sl.No Date Topic Presenter
Academic Activities – NBEMS lectures
Sl.No Date Topic Presenter
Academic Activities – IAPC lectures
Sl.No Date Topic Presenter Moderator