Experimental Setup 2016
Experimental Setup 2016
Presentation Outline
Introduction
Types of dynamic testing
Real earthquake experience
In-situ test
Cyclic loading test
Shaking table test
Pseudo-dynamic test
Summary
Introduction
Testing and experimentation are important
for seismic evaluation.
Laboratory testing is most applicable to
experimental analysis.
Experimental analysis can be performed on
either un-scaled prototypes or scaled
models of elements.
Developments in computer and electronics
industries have made experimentation a
competitive proposition, especially for the
study of complex behavior.
Objective
To easily understand the structures’
response to an earthquake.
To observe how stable the structure is
during earthquakes.
Qualification of a structure under
seismic loads, to make sure that it will
be “functional” during or after the
earthquake.
Objective
The output of the test is to provide
qualitative or quantitative data to assess
the seismic behavior of a structure.
For validation and calibration of analytical
models of the structure on the “whole”
model or part of the structure.
To accelerate the development of seismic
isolation equipments and minimize the
damage caused by an earthquake.
Validation of specific design principles for
special construction, especially when the
standards are lacking .
In-situ tests
The actual prototype is excited by ambient
vibration or by artificial excitation with
centrifuge or hydraulic exciter, explosion …
It is employed to validate frequencies and
mode shapes of the construction and to
give some information on damping.
Advantage: Real structure in actual
condition is tested.
But it is not possible to apply strong input
energy, if the structure to be used after
Experimental setup
Constant axial
load
Reversed cyclic
lateral loading
Test specimen
Historical background of ST
First shaking tables appeared in the 30s
with a very limited capacity. Largest tables
appeared in the 60s in USA (UC Berkeley),
Japan, France (in 1968 in Saclay) and Italy.
Largest table is in Japan at National
Institute for Earth Science and Disaster
Prevention (NIED) with a 6 DOF, payload
of 1200 tons and 300 m2 (20m x 15m)
area.
Examples
Pseudo-Dynamic Testing
PsD test can be used to assess the seismic
response of structures at natural scale in a
better way.
The PsD is a hybrid technique, coupling test
and computer analysis.
The desire to test large model pushed the
development of PsD together with the
improvement of numerical and computer
techniques.
Describes the dynamic response of a
structure based on a model with a finite
number of dynamic degrees of freedom.
Adil Zekaria (AAiT) 33
Advantage of PsD
Can be performed at real scale:
Test can be done slowly:
highest quality in the measurements
continuous observation and monitoring
full control of collapse point
possible modification of measurement set-
up
Disadvantage of PsD
Tests are performed at “reduced”
velocity: some visco-elastic materials, with
a low damping depending on velocity, are
not well represented.
Force application at a few nodal points or
DOFs→ inadequate for structure with
highly distributed mass since masses
are assumed to be concentrated.
The vertical excitation is usually not
considered, which may cause some
troubles. Usually limited to horizontal
component of seismic excitation.
Summary
Even though, experimental set up for dynamic
testing is an expensive procedure, it must not be
ignored.
The new method like the internet based pseudo-
dynamic test method gives effective results .
It helps to exchange information between different
laboratories around the world.
By doing these experiments, the structures’ response
to an earthquake can be understood. The results will
show how stable the structure is during earthquakes.
The outcome of the dynamic testing can be used for
development of seismic controls and minimize the
damage caused by an earthquake since a structure
must be able to sustain its main functions of safety
and serviceability, during and after an earthquake
exposure.
Adil Zekaria (AAiT) 45