0% found this document useful (0 votes)
34 views82 pages

wk1 Introduction - To - CT - Principles

The document discusses the physical principles of computed tomography (CT). It provides an overview of the historical development of CT, compares CT to conventional radiography, and explains the working principles and technological advancements that have occurred in CT imaging, such as the development from single slice to multi-slice systems.

Uploaded by

lclok0802
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
34 views82 pages

wk1 Introduction - To - CT - Principles

The document discusses the physical principles of computed tomography (CT). It provides an overview of the historical development of CT, compares CT to conventional radiography, and explains the working principles and technological advancements that have occurred in CT imaging, such as the development from single slice to multi-slice systems.

Uploaded by

lclok0802
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 82

Physical Principles of Computed

Tomography

Teacher : Dr Patrick LAI Yau-Ming


Department of Health Technology & Informatics
Objectives

 Brief overview of Historical Development in CT


 To compare the performance between Conventional
radiographic imaging and computed tomography
 To demonstrate an understanding of the working
principle underpinning computed tomography
 To explain the rationales behind the development from
conventional to Single Slice Spiral CT and then to
Multislice Spiral CT
Resources
References:
• Romans, L.E. (2011). Computed tomography for
technologists: A Comprehensive Text, Williams &
Wilkins: Baltimore.
• Seeram, E. (2009). Computed Tomography: Physical
Principles, Clinical Applications & Quality Control,
Saunders:Philadelphia
Prescribed Paper Reading:
• Kalender (2006) Review X-ray computed
Tomography
• Goldman (2007) Principles of CT and CT Technology
• Goldman (2007) Principles of CT: Multislice CT
Historical overview: the development of CT
Adapted From: Kalender (2005)
1895 WC Roentgen discovered “ X-rays”
1917 JH Radon develops the mathematical foundation for reconstructing cross-sectional images
from transmission measurements

1963 AM Cormack describes a technique for calculating the absorption distribution in the
human body
1972 GN Hounsfield and J Ambrose conduct the first Clinical CT examinations

1974 60 Clinical CT installations (head scanners)


1975 First Whole-body CT scanner in clinical use
1979 Hounsfield and Cormack awarded the Nobel Prize in Medicine or Physiology

1989 WA Kalender and P Vock conduct the first clinical examinations with Spiral CT (single
slice system)
1998 Introduction of multi-slice scanners (4-slice system)
2000 Introduction of combined PET/CT systems
2001 Introduction of 16-slice scanner systems
2004 Introduction of 64-slice scanner systems
2004 More than 40,000 whole-body CT scanner installations
2005 Dual source CT
2004-2007 Development of prototype 256-slice scanner system/320-slice system
2014 Detector-Based Spectral CT
The pioneer
Wilhelm Conrad Roentgen

Crookes’ tube

From: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
The First Radiograph

From: Fauber (2000)


CT scanning the early days

C B

From: Beckmann (2006)


Pioneer in CT

Godlfrey Newbold Hounsfield

Allan MacLeod Cormack From: Seeram (2001)


Pioneer in Spiral CT
W A Kalender

From: Seeram 2001


What is CT
CT: imaging process

• Computed Tomography is the


process of scanning a patient
to obtain multiple
measurements of x-ray
absorption coefficients taken
from thin sections through the
body and reconstructing these
measurements into an image
that displays that section’s
anatomy

From: Graham (1996)

CT Image: Brain
CT image

Pixel and Voxel

From: Romans (1995)


CT Number for Various tissues

CT number ( Hu)   t- w w x scaling factor

From: Romans (1995)


A comparison between conventional radiographic imaging and CT imaging

From: Seeram (2001)


Limitations of conventional radiographic
imaging
• Superimposition of
all structures on
the radiograph

From: Seeram (2001)


Limitation of conventional tomography

• Overlying blurs
produced by the
tomographic
movement
• Scattered radiation

From: Seeram (2001)


Limitations of conventional radiographic
imaging
• Radiographic imaging is
a qualitative rather than a
quantitative procedure

From: Seeram (2001)


Advantages of CT

• Remove the
problem of
superimposition of
structures
Advantages of CT
• Excellent low-contrast
resolution
• Radiography can only
discriminate an
attenuation difference of
about 10% whereas CT
has the advantage of
detecting 0.25 to 0.5%
attenuation difference
Levels of patient dose from x-ray examinations in the UK

Examination Typical effective dose (mSv)

CT Conventional
Head 1.8 0.1
Chest 8.3 0.04
Abdomen 7.2 1.4
Pelvis 7.3 1.0
CT: Data Acquisition
Dual Source CT 128 Slices

Courtesy: QEH, Department of Radiology


High Speed Processor and Power Control

Courtesy: QEH, Department of Radiology


CT: Imaging procedures

From: Brooker (1986)


Examples of CT Images

Courtesy: QEH, Department of Radiology


Scan Setup
 Patient registration  KV/mA/scan time
 mode of acquisition  tube angle
 Patient position  gantry angle
 Slice thickness/slice  Breath hold
interval/pitch  scan protocols
 Scan location
 SFOV/DFOV
 Contrast( type/volume)
 Reconstruction algorithm
Production of a CT image
Data acquisition

Image
reconstruction

Image Display,
Manipulation,
Storage and
recording
From: Seeram
Data acquisition geometry
• 1st generation
• Parallel beam
• Translate-Rotate

From: Seeram
Data acquisition geometry
• 2nd generation
• Fan beam
• Translate-rotate

From: Seeram
Data acquisition geometry
• 3rd generation
• Fan beam
• Rotate-rotate

From: Seeram
Data acquisition geometry
• 4th generation
• Fan beam
• Fixed and rotate
Electron beam CT

From: Seeram
(2001)
Important features of each generation

Generation Configuration detectors beam min.


scan time
First translate-rotate 1-2 pencil thin 2.5 min

Second translate-rotate 3-52 narrow fan 10 sec

Third rotate-rotate 256-1000 wide fan 1 sec

Fourth rotate-fixed 600-4800 wide fan 1 sec

Fifth electron beam 1284 wide fan 50 ms


electron
beam
Development of CT scanner

 1st scanner: 1972


 EBCT: 1984
 2-slice (1994) 4-slice(1998)
8-slice(2001) 16-slice(2002)
64-slice(2004) dual source(2006)
256-detectors(2007) & 320-detectors (2008)

 Rotation time: 500ms 330ms


 Min. slice thickness: 1.25mm 0.5 mm
 Scanning time:40s 8s single heart beat
Dual Source CT

From: Siemens
„Rotating Vacuum Vessel“ X-ray Tube Technology
with z-flying focal spot

Oil for HV
Rotating vacuum vessel
Emitter insulation
and cooling

Straton tube
Photo:
Deflection coils Motor Courtesy
Electron beam Ball bearings of Siemens
Housing
X-rays
Schardt et al. Medical Physics 2004; 31:2699-2706
Double z-Sampling Technology
z-Flying Focal Spot

Electromagnetic Control Rotating


of the Electron beam Anode

0,6 mm
0,6 mm

32 detector rows
(64 slices scanned) Samplingdistance:
Sampling distance: 0.3
0.3mm
mm

Kalender WA. Computed Tomography. 2nd ed. Wiley & Sons, New York 2005
CT:Image Reconstruction
Data Acquisition system (DAS)
Signal • Measuring of the
conver- transmitted radiation
sion beam
• Logarithmic conversion
• Encoding these
DAS measurements into
binary data
• Transmitting the binary
data

From: Seeram (2001)


What do we measure in CT ?
Io Io Io

Io I1

Io I2
D

Io I161

I162 I163 I320

Adapted from Seeram (2001)


What do we measure in CT: Ray Sum
 1,1d1  1,2d 2  1,3d 3  ....1,160d160
I1  I 0 e
I 0  e 1,1d1  1,2d 2  1,3d 3  ....1,160d160
I1
160
I
ln 0    d i  Ray Sum
1,i
I 1 i1
What do we measure in CT:
Attenuation Profile (A series of ray
sums)
ln (Io/I1)

Image
Reconstruction

Distance (D)
Image Reconstructon: Back
Projection method
Tomographic Reconstruction: The numbers in a
Box Puzzle
P 3(1) P 3(2) P 3(3) P 3(4) P 3(5)

P1(1) A B C D E 0

P1(2)
F G H I J 50

P1(3) K L M N O 10

P1(4)
P Q R S T 10

P1(5) U V W X Y 10

10 10 40 10 10
Tomographic reconstruction: Reconstructing the
numbers in a box
P 3(1) P 3(2) P 3(3) P 3(4) P 3(5)

P1(1) 0 0 0 0 0 0

P1(2)
10 10 10 10 10 50

P1(3) 0 0 10 0 0 10

P1(4)
0 0 10 0 0 10

P1(5) 0 0 10 0 0 10

10 10 40 10 10
Tomographic reconstruction

2 2 8 2 2
2 2 8 2 2
2 2 8 2 2
2 2 8 2 2
2 2 8 2 2

The array, after backprojection of the vertical projection


Tomographic reconstruction: Reveal
the “T”
2 2 8 2 2
12 12 18 12 12
4 4 10 4 4
4 4 10 4 4
4 4 10 4 4

The array, after adding the second horizontal


backprojection
From slice by slice CT to single slice
spiral CT
Slice-by-slice sequential CT scanning
Spiral CT: Slip Ring

Courtesy to Ms Wendy Wong (QMH)


Reciprocating rotation verse
Continuous rotation

From: Seeram
From: http://pet.utu.fi/files/Basics_of_CT.pdf
Spiral/Helical/Volumetric CT

Continuous &
Simultaneous
• Source rotation
• Patient translation
• Data acquisition

From: Kalender
(1990)
Spiral/helical geometry created when the X-
ray tube rotates continuously around the
Helical CT- Advantages

• Reduction in respiratory
misregistration
• Quick scan times
• Optimal vessel
opacification
• Unlimited reconstruction
intervals
• High-quality 3
Dimensional and multi-
planar images
• Reduction in IV contrast
Slice-by-Slice misregistration
Single-breath hold acquisition

Shifting of lesions because of different levels of From: Seeram (2001)


respiration
Good News About Spiral CT
- Retrospective Reconstruction
Retrospective
Direct reconstruction reconstruction

Scanning loci Slices Scanning locus Slices


Accuracy of 3D reconstruction

Stair-step artifact

Data acquisition Data Processing 3D Image


From: Seeram (2001)
Good News About Spiral CT
- Retrospective Reconstruction

Retrospective
Direct reconstruction reconstruction
Helical CT: Data Inconsistency

• Motion artifacts
• Linear interpolation(LI) is
essential to create planar
data from helical raw data
before reconstruction
• 360 and 180 deg. LI

From: Romans (1995)


Direct reconstruction of Spiral Data

Phantom
studies

Thoracic
studies

Streak artifact From: Seeram (2001)


Spiral CT Raw Data
Full-Scan Interpolation (FI, 360LI)
z
y

Ray A
Spiral CT Raw Data
Half-Scan Interpolation (HI,
180LI) z
y

Ray A
SSP: Z-interpolation and Pitch

From:Kalender (2005)
From single slice spiral CT to multislice
spiral CT
Single slice spiral CT: Compromised
performance

Speed Volume

Detail
• Single slice spiral CT of Abdomen-Pelvis
covering 600 mm of Anatomy

• 5 mm slice thickness

•Pitch = 1; 120 rotations

•Exposure factors: 120 KVp, 250 mA, 1 sec.

• Determine (i) the total energy deposited in the


X-ray tube during the spiral scan (ii) the energy
deposited in the X-ray tube for an axial slice in
sequential CT with an equivalent exposure factors
Advantages of multislice scanning

 Faster acquisition compared with single slice


spiral CT scanner
 Better for uncooperative, breathless, and trauma
patients
 A larger area can be covered during a single
acquisition
 Less movement artifact
 Lifelike multiplanar reformats
 Improved vascular and cardiac imaging
 Potential for faster throughput of patients
Disadvantages of multislice scanning

 Increased capital cost


 Increased cost for replacement tubes and
data storage
 More time required to analyse data
 Increased radiological workload
 Potential for higher radiation dose
Detector Configuration: Single slice vs multislice
From: http://pet.utu.fi/files/Basics_of_CT.pdf
Multislice CT Coronary angiography
Peripheral Runoff

From: Klingenbeck-Regn (1999)


END

You might also like