Fundamental Concepts of Algebr1
Fundamental Concepts of Algebr1
Chapter one
Mathematical logic
Introduction to logic
Logic is the analysis and assessment of arguments. In other word it is about
reasoning the arguments going from premises to a conclusion. The arguments are the
composed from different compound statement which is formulated using the word so-
called connective such as and, or, if…, then…., and if and only if, and a word not.
Further, the formulated composite sentence and statement are examined under the
various topics such as statement calculus such as truth table, validity, rule of inference,
and arithmetic formula and predicate calculus such as symbolizing everyday language,
formulation and consequence. Thus, we will try to clarify reasoning and separate good
from bad reasoning (which is called the validity of argument) with aid of logic. As a result,
logic is relevant game with funny symbols, but as a useful tool to clarify and evaluate our
reasoning.
Moreover, it is important because, reasoning is important. While you’ve been
reasoning about things all your life, this may be the first time that you try to understand
reasoning and become better at it. Reasoning and general analytical skills are important in
law, politics, journalism, education, medicine, business, science, mathematics, computer
science, and most other areas.
This chapter devoted with detail presentation, examples, activities and exercises.
Hence student can have better understanding logic (so they better support their
conclusions).
Finally, logic can be fun. Doing logic is like playing a game or doing puzzles; logic
will challenge your thinking processes in new ways. The rigor of logical systems will
likely fascinate you. Most people find logic enjoyable.
Objectives:
At the end of this chapter you will able to:
understand the statement calculus,
identify the importance of sentential connectives,
apply rules of inferences,
prove the validity of the arguments,
As stated in this definition the fundamental property of any propositional logic is that it is
either true or false (and it cannot be both true and false).we say that a propositional logic
has truth value T if it is true and truth value F if it is false. The sentences we come across
in our everyday language are not always declarative sentences. There are also sentences
such as questions, commands, suggestions, proposals or exclamations. However,
mathematics deals only with declarative sentences.
Example .consider the following sentences:
a) 2 is a prime number. c) Wonderful!
b) What is your name? d) A triangle has four sides.
It is clear that a and d are propositional logic with truth value T and F respectively. On the
other hand, the remaining sentences are not propositional logic because they cannot
classify as being either true or false.
Definition 1.1.2 An Open-proposition is a sentence which contains one or more variables
or pronouns and which becomes a statement when each of its variables or
pronouns is replaced by a specific value or an individual.
Example Consider the following sentences:
a) X is a multiple of 10. C) He is a student.
b) 2x+1=10. d) 2x+1>3
Each of these sentences is an Open-proposition. They are, as they stand now, neither
true nor false. Their truth value depends on the values or individuals which are used to
replace the variables or the pronouns.
Activities
1. Which of the following sentences are propositional logic?
a. Aksum is in Israel.
b. All triangles are isosceles.
c. Oil is solid.
d. 10 is a natural number.
2. Indicate which of the following sentences are Open-proposition.
a. x is a factor of 12. C. 9-(-6) =67
b. x+4=4
Sentential connective
In mathematical course and elsewhere so many compound statements are formed by word
not or by the words and, or, if . . . then (or implies), and if and only if. These five words or
combinations of words are called sentential connectives. Our first concern here is the
analysis of the structure of a composite sentence (that is, a declarative sentence in which
one or more connectives appear) in terms of its constituent prime sentences (that is,
sentences which either contain no connectives or, by choice, are regarded as "indivisible"
or premises). We shall look first at the propositional logic (and open propositions) and
connectives individually.
Definition 1.2.3 A sentence which is modified by the word "not" is called the negation of
the original sentence.
Example i) The negation of “2 is a prime,” is “2 is not a prime”.
ii) The negation of “ 2 is a prime and 6 is a composite number,” is, “It is not
the case that 2 is a prime and 6 is a composite number”.
Note. Later we use the phrase "It is not the case that" instead of simply the word "not."
Definition 1.1.4. The word "and" is used to join two sentences to form a composite
sentence which is called the conjunction of the two sentences.
Example The conjunction of the sentences, “sun is shining” and “It is cold outside,” is
"The sun is shining, and it is cold outside".
Note. Same time we use a word "but," instead of word “and” which is synonyms.
Definition 1.1.5 A sentence formed by connecting two sentences with the word "or" is
called the disjunction of the two sentences.
Note: The use of ꞌꞌorꞌꞌ in propositional logic is rather different from its normal use in the
Note
Now if P and Q are statements, then so are each of P , P ⋀ Q , P ⋁ Q , P →Q ,∧P↔ Q .
The composite sentence whose prime components are statements is itself a statement.
Examples
Determine the truth value for a given composite statement
P ⋁ Q → ¿) where the truth value of P , Q, R ,∧S areT , F , F ,∧T respectively.
Solution: The antecedent part P ⋁ Q has truth value T and the consequent part R ↔ S has
truth value T. Thus in conditional statement if both antecedent and consequent have the
truth value true (T), the conditional statement has truth value T. In other way the truth
If (⌐p ⋁ r ) ⋁(⌐r→ q) has a truth value F, then what is the truth value of
[r ⋁(⌐p ⋁q)]↔[(⌐q→ (r⋀ ⌐p)].
Solution: (⌐p ⋁ r ) ⋁(⌐r→ q)≡ F only if (⌐p ⋁ r ) ≡F≡ (⌐ r→ q).
(⌐p ⋁ r ) ≡F only if ⌐p≡F≡r and (⌐ r→ q) ≡ F only if ⌐ r≡T and q ≡F
⌐p≡F only if p≡T, r≡F and ⌐r≡T only if r≡F, q≡F.
∴ [r ⋁(⌐p ⋁q)]↔[(⌐q→ (r⋀ ⌐p)]
[F ⋁(F ⋁F)]↔[(T→ ¿F⋀ F )]
[F ⋁ F]↔[T→F]
F↔ F
T
Solution: As the value of P, C, and I change from T to F or vice versa, the composite
statement has value T or value F. This is examined using truth table for each possible
assignment (23) of truth value to P, C, & I.
The lines 2,3,4,and 6 are show that the composite statements has truth value true and
line1,5,7,and 8 are show that the composite statement has truth value false.
Example: construct the truth table for the compound ( p ⋀ q)→(q ⋁ p).As before,we write in
the first two columns the four possible pairs of truth values for the statements p and q.
P q q p⋀ q q⋁ p ( p ⋀ q)→(q ⋁ p)
T T F T T T
T F T T T T
F T F F T T
F F T F F T
Observe that the last column in above table has only T’s.In other words,the given statement
( p ⋀ q)→(q ⋁ p) is true in every case.When this occurs,the statement is called a tautology.
A tautology is a compound (composite) statement which is true for all possible truth values
of its components. On the other hand, a compound statement that is false for all possible
truth values of its components is called a contradiction. For example
(p→ q)⋀ (q → r )]⋀ ( p → r) is contradiction.
Activities
1. Suppose that the statements P, Q, R, and S are assigned the truth values T, F, F, and T,
(b). Suppose the value of P↔Q is T; what can be said about the values of
P ↔Q and P ↔Q ?
(c) Suppose the value of P ↔Q is F ; what can be said about the values of
P ↔Q∧P↔ Q ?
Predicate logic
logical predicates
A logical predicate is a property that can be attributed to individuals. For instance of
ꞌꞌblackꞌꞌ can be attributed to individuals like human beings,cars,tables,etc.Another predicate
that can be attributed to numbers is ꞌꞌgreater than 7ꞌꞌ.in ordinary language, given a predicate
there is more or less a determined class of individuals to which it applies. For instance, let
us consider the following thee propositions which use the predicate ꞌꞌgreater than 7ꞌꞌ.
1. 10 is ꞌꞌgreater than 7ꞌꞌ. (True)
2. 3 is ꞌꞌgreater than 7ꞌꞌ. (False)
3. Africa is ꞌꞌgreater than 7ꞌꞌ. (False)
More Examples
1. England is ꞌꞌa town in Angolaꞌꞌ.
2. 2 is ꞌꞌa square root of 4ꞌꞌ.
3. Addis Ababa is ꞌꞌa whole numberꞌꞌ.
Open propositions
Definition 1.1.8 An open proposition is a sentence which contains one or more variables
and which becomes a proposition when each of its variables is replaced
by a particular individual.
Remark: if in an open proposition, the collection of objects from which we choose
replacements for the variables is specified, then this collection of objects is called the
universal set and is dented by ꞌꞌ⋃ꞌꞌ.
Example
Here are some open propositions:
x is a town in Angola
y is greater than 7.
x is a whole number.
x-y is divisible by 6.
Determine which of the following are True and which are False:
In this section the analysis of logical relations among sentences which depend only
on their composition from constituent sentences using sentential connectives shall be
discussed. The setting includes the presence of an initial set the "prime sentences" and the
following two assumptions.
Each prime sentence is a statement, which its truth value is known.
Each sentence composed from prime sentences using sentential connectives and its truth
value determine from truth value of prime sentence.
Suppose there is given a nonempty set of distinct sentences and that we extend this
set by adjoining precisely all of those sentences which can be formed by using, repeatedly
and in all possible ways, the various sentential connectives.
Note. Then the extended set has the following property.
If A and B are members, then so are each of A , A ⋁ B , A ⋀ B , A → B , andA ↔ B .
The members of the extended class are called formulas.
The members of the initial set are the prime formulas, and the others are composite
formulas.
The prime formulas which appear in a composite formula are said to be contained in that
formula are called its prime components.
The truth value of a composite formula is defined inductively in accordance with the
following table
Examples
If the prime components in a formula A are P1 , P2 , … , P n then the definition of the truth
value of A in terms of truth values of P1 , P2 , … , P n can be exhibited in a truth table, as
described earlier. There are 2n rows in such a table, each row exhibiting one possible
assignment of T's and F's to P1 , P2 , … , P n.
Let A be a formula having P1 , P2 , … , P nas its prime components. Then A provides a rule
for associating with any ordered n-tuple of T ' sand F ' s, whose i th coordinate is the
Remark: - The out-fix notation⋀ ( p , q)is the other form notation of ( p ⋀ q).
The statement calculus is concerned with the truth values of composite formulas
in terms of truth-value assignments to the prime components and the interrelations of the
truth values of composite formulas having some prime components in common.
Definition 1.2.1 A formula whose value is T, for all possible assignments of truth values
to its prime components called valid and denoted by ⊨ A for " A is valid
" ;otherwise it is invalid.
Note: The most mechanical method of proving the validity of a given formula is a truth
table and If a formula A is not valid its truth value is determined by using truth table.
- Let P1 , P2 , … , P n be prime components in A . A is said to be tautology iff for each of the
2n assignments of T's and F's to P1 , P2 , … , P n is T.
Example p → p and P ⋀ ( p→ Q)→ Q are tautologies, whereas P →(Q→ R) is not. These
conclusions are based on an examination of Tables I, II, and III, below.
The computation and examination of its truth table is may be tedious. So, to overcome this,
we develop the rule to verify Tautology.
Theorem 1.2.1 (Substitution rule) Let B be a formula and let B* be the formula resulting
from B by the substitution of a formula A for all occurrences of a prime
component P contained in B. if ⊨B, then ⊨B*.
Proof: For an assignment of values to the prime components of B∗¿ there results a value
v (A )of A and a value v ¿of B∗¿ . Now v ¿ the value of B for a particular assignment of
values to its prime components, including the assignment of v (A )to P. If B is valid, then
v (B) and hence v ¿ is always T. That is, if B is valid, then so is B∗∎
Examples
From below Table IV it follows that⊨ P ⋁ Q⟷ QVP . Hence, by Theorem 1.1 ⊨(R→S)
⋁Q ⟷Q ⋁(R→S). We can verify a result by Table V.
⊨ A ⋁ B ⟷ B ⋁ A. 20'. ⊨ A ⋀ B ⟷ B ⋀ A .
⊨( A ⋁ B) ⋁ C ⟷ A ⋁ ( B ⋁ C ). 21'. ⊨( A ⋀ B) ⋀ C ⟷ A ⋀ ( B ⋀ C ).
⊨ A ⋁ (B ⋀ C )⟷ (A ⋁ B) ⋀ ( A ⋁ C). 22'. ⊨ A ⋀ (B ⋁ C )⟷ (A ⋀ B) ⋁ ( A ⋀ C).
⊨ A ⋁ A⟷ A . 23'. ⊨ A ⋀ A ⟷ A .
⊨( A ⋁ B)⟷ A ⋀ B . 24'. ⊨( A ⋀ B)⟷ A ⋁ B .
Tautologies for Elimination of Connectives
⊨ A → B ⟷ A ⋁ B.
⊨ A → B ⟷ (A ⋀ B).
⊨ A ⋁ B⟷ A→B
⊨ A ⋁ B ⟷( A ⋀ B).
⊨ A ⋀ B ⟷ (A → B).
⊨( A ⟷ B)⟷( A → B) ⋀ (B→ A) .
Note
The denial, Ad , of a formula A is the formula resulting from A by replacing each
occurrence of ⋀ by ⋁and vice versa and replacing each occurrence of Pi , by an occurrence of
Pi and vice versa.
Example The denial of P ⋁ Q is P ⋀ Q and the denial of (P ⋀ Q) is P ⋁ Q .
Theorem 1.2.6. Let A be a formula composed from prime components using only, ⋀ , ⋁, and
let Ad be the denial of A. Then⊨ A ⟷ A d .
Proof: By induction on the number of symbols appearing in a formula.
Examples
Let A=((P⋀ Q) ⋁ R ) ⋁ ¿ (Q ⋁ R )) then find the denial of A?
A =((P ⋀ Q) ⋁ R) ⋁ (P ⋀ (Q ⋁ R))
=((P ⋀ Q) ⋁ R) ⋀ (P ⋀ (Q ⋁ R))
=((P ⋀ Q) ⋀ R) ⋀ (P ⋁ (Q ⋁ R))
=((P ⋁ Q) ⋀ R) ⋀ (P ⋁ (Q ⋀ R))
=((P ⋁ Q) ⋀ R) ⋀ (P ⋁ (Q ⋀ R))
Since Ad ≡ A ,then Ad =((P ⋁ Q) ⋀ R) ⋀ (P ⋁ (Q ⋀ R))
Activities
Activities
1. Verify using truth table that the following are valid or not.
a) P →Q ,(Q ⋁ R)⊨Q
b) P ⋁ Q , R ⟶Q ⊨ P → R.
2. Show that P , P Q ⊨Q is valid.
Theorem 1.2.8
A ⊨ B iff ⊨ A → B .
A1 , A 2 ,… , A m ⊨ B iff A1 ⋀ A 2 ⋀ … ⋀ A m ⊨ B or, if ⊨ A 1 ⋀ A 2 ⋀ … ⋀ A m → B (m> 2).
Proof: (⟹) For (I), let A ⊨ B. By the table for→ , A → B receives the value F if A
receives the value T, and, simultaneously, B receives the value F. From the hypothesis, this
combination of values does not occur. Hence A → B always receives the value T, that is,
⊨ A → B.
(⟸) Let ⊨ A → B , and consider an assignment of values to the prime
components such that A receives the value T. Since A → B receives the value T, it follows
from the table for→ that Btakes the value T, whence, A ⊨ B
The first assertion in (II) follows from the table for A, and the second follows from the first
by an application of (I).
Corollary 1.2.9 A1,A2,… ,Am-1,Am ⊨ B iff A1,A2,… ,Am-1 ⊨ Am→ B.
More generally, A1,A2,… ,Am-1,Am ⊨ B iff ⊨ A1 →(A2→ (…(Am→B)…)).
Proof: For m = 1, the first assertion is (I) of the theorem. So, assume that A 1,… , Am-1, Am
⊨B for m > 1.Then ⊨ (A1⋀ A2 ⋀ … ⋀ Am-1⋀ A m →B), according to the theorem. From
tautology 8 of Theorem 1.4 and Theorem 1.3, we deduce that ⊨(A1⋀ A2 ⋀ … ⋀ Am-1¿ →
¿ ¿B). According to (I) of the theorem, it follows that A 1⋀ A2 ⋀ … ⋀ Am-1 ⊨ Am →B and
hence, by (II), that A1,A2,… ,Am-1 ⊨ A m →B. The converse is established by reversing the
foregoing steps
Finally, the second assertion follows by repeated application of the first.
Thus, the problem of what statements are consequences of others (by the statement
calculus) is reduced to the problem of what statements are valid (which accounts for the
importance of tautologies). Indeed, we can substantiate a working form as a sequence of
formulas (the last formula being the desired consequence of the premises) such that the
presence of each is justified by a rule, called a rule of inference (for the statement calculus.
The basis of the rules of inference which we shall introduce is the following theorem.
Theorem 1.2.10
A1,…, Am-1, Am ⊨Ai for i= 1, 2, … ,m.
If A1,… , Am ⊨Bj for j = 1, 2,… ,p, and if B1,B2,…,Bp ⊨C, then A1,… ,Am ⊨C.
Proof: Part (I) is an immediate consequence of the definition of " A 1,… , Am-1, Am ⊨B."
For (II) we construct a truth table from the list P1 , P2 , … , P n. of all prime components
appearing in at least one of the A's, the B's, and C. Consider any row in which A 1, A2, … ,
Am each receive the value T. Then, by the hypotheses, each B has the value T, and hence
C has the value T. That is, for each assignment of values to the P's such that every A takes
the value T, formula receives the value T. This is the desired conclusion∎
With this result, a demonstration that a formula B (the conclusion) is a consequence
of formulas A1,… , Am-1, Am (the premises) may be presented in the form of a string (that
is, a finite sequence) of formulas, the last of which is B and such that the presence of each
formula E is justified by an application of one of the following rules.
Rule p: The formula E is a premise.
Rule t: There are formulas A , … , D preceding E in the string such that
⊨ A ⋀….,⋀ D ⟶ E.
Note If ⊨ D , then for any formula A we have⊨ A ⟶ D . Thus, D may be included in a
derivation by an application of rule I where in we take any premise as the "A."
Examples
We demonstrate that
A ⋁ B , A ⟶ C , B ⟶ D ⊨C ⋁ D .
Solution: An explanation of the numerals on the left is given below.
{1} (1) A⟶C Rule p
{1} (2) A⋁ B⟶C ⋁B Rule t; ⊨(1) ⟶ (2) by tautology 11
{3} (3) B⟶ D Rule p
{3} (4) C ⋁B⟶C ⋁ D Rule t; ⊨(3)⟶ (4) by tautology 11
{1, 3} (5) A⋁ B⟶C ⋁ D Rule t; ⊨(2) ⋀ (4) ⟶ (5) by tautology 7.
{6} (6) A⋁ B Rule p
{1, 3, 6} (7) C⋁D Rule t; ⊨(6) ⋀ (5) ⟶ (7) by tautology 1.
The numbers in parentheses adjacent to each formula serve to designate that
formula as well as the line of the derivation in which it appears.
Note: The set of numbers in braces for each line corresponds to the premises on which the
formula in that line depends. Thus, the formula in line 5 is a consequence of the premise in
line 1 and the premise in line 3, and the formula in line 7 is a consequence of the premises
in lines 1, 3, and 6--that is, of all the premises.
We now rewrite the above derivation, incorporating some practical
abbreviations. In this form the reader is called on to supply the tautologies employed.
{1} (1) A⟶C p
{1} (2) A⋁ B⟶C ⋁B 1t
{3} (3) B⟶ D p
{3} (4) C ⋁B⟶C ⋁ D 3t
{1, 3} (5) A⋁ B⟶C ⋁ D 2, 4 t
{6} (6) A⋁ B p
{1, 3, 6} (7) C⋁D 5,6t
As a more elaborate illustration we prove that
W ⋁ P ⟶ I , I ⟶ C ⋁ S , S ⟶ U , C ⋀ U ⊨W
by the following string of thirteen formulas.
{1} (1) C ⋀U p
{1} (2) U 1t
{3} (3) S⟶U p
{1,3} (4) S 2,3t
{1} (5) C 1t
{1, 3} (6) C ⋀S 4, 5 t
{1,3} (7) (C ⋁ S) 6t
{8} (8) W ⋁P⟶ I p
{9} (9) I ⟶C ⋁S p
{8,9} (10) W ⋁P⟶C ⋁S 8,9t
{1,3,8,9} (11) (W ⋁ P) 7,10t
{1,3,8,9} (12) W⋀P 11t
{1,3,8,9} (13) W 12t
Note: The preceding takes the place of a truth table having 26 = 64 lines for the purpose of
verifying that
⊨(W ⋁ P ⟶ I ) ⋀ (I ⟶ C ⋁ S ) ⋀ (S ⟶ U ) ⋀ (C ⋀ U )⟶ W .
Remark: Most of the theorems have the form of conditional. That is, A 1, A2,…,An ⊨
B⟶ C , where the A ' s are the axioms and B⟶ C is the consequence asserted.
Note: To prove such a theorem it is standard practice to adopt B as a further assumption
and then infer that C is a consequence. Thus, it is implied that
A1, A2,… , An ⊨ B⟶C, iff , A1, A2,… , An , B ⊨ C. (by Corollary1.2 )
This is as the third rule of inference, the rule of conditional proof for the statement
calculus.
Rule cp: The formula B⟶ C is justified in a derivation having A1, A2,… , An as premises
if it has been established that C is a consequence of A1, A2,… , An, and B.
Example Verify using the third rule A ⟶( B ⟶C ), D ⋁ A , B ⊨ D ⟶C .
{1} (1) A ⟶(B ⟶C ) p
{2} (2) D⋁ A p
{3} (3) B P
{4} (4) D p (introducing "D" as an
additional premise)
{2, 4} (5) A 2,4t
{1,2,4} (6) B⟶ C 1, 5 t
{1, 2, 3, 4} (7) C 3, 6 t
{1, 2, 3} (8) D ⟶C 4, 7 cp
Activities
1. Using only rules p and t verify AV B , C ⟶ B ⊨ A ⟶ C .
Quantified proposition
The theory of inference supplied by the statement calculus is quite inadequate for
mathematics and, indeed, for everyday arguments. For example, from the premises
Every rational number is a real number,
5 is a rational number,
Certainly, 5 is a real number
is justified as a conclusion. Yet the validity of this argument cannot be established within
the context of the statement calculus. The reason is that the statement calculus is limited to
the structure of sentences in terms of component sentences, and the above inference
requires an analysis of sentence structure with the addition of three additional logical
notions, called terms, predicates, and quantifiers, it has been found that much of everyday
and mathematical language can be symbolized in such a way as to make possible an
analysis of an argument.
Note: In mathematics the letters such x∧y are reserve for names of individual objects. For
example, in order to determine those real numbers such that the square of the number
minus the number is equal to twelve, one will form the equation x2 - x = 12, thereby
regarding "x" as a placeholder for the name of any such (initially unknown) number.
Examples
The sentence
Every rational number is a real number may be translated as
For every x, if x is a rational number, then x is a real number.
In ordinary grammar, "is a real number" is the predicate of (a). In the translation (b) the
added predicate "x is a rational number" replaces the common noun "rational number."
Using "Q(x ) for x is a rational number" and " R(x ) for x is a real number," we may
symbolize (b) as
(i) For every x , Q(x )→ R(x).
Further, the statement "5 is a rational number" may be symbolized by
(ii) Q(5).
In terms of symbolism available at the moment, (i) and (ii) are the translations of the
premises of the argument appearing at the beginning of this section.
The sentence, Some real numbers are rational
We translate as: For some x, x is a real number and x is a rational number.
Using the predicates introduced above, this may be symbolizing
for some x , R (x) ⋀ Q (x).
The sentence
(iii) For some x , R(x )→ Q(x )
should have the same meaning as:
(iv¿ For some x , R ( x ) ⋁ Q(x ),
Since we have simply replaced " R(x )→ Q(x )" by its equivalent R( x ) ⋁ Q( x) . Now
(iv) may be translated into words as:
There is something which is either not a real number or is a rational number.
Consider the statement: if S(x) is "x is a sophomore," this predicate yields the
statement "John is a sophomore." A statement may also be obtained from S(x) by prefixing
it with the phrase "for every x":
(v¿ For every x , x is a sophomore.
No doubt, one would choose to rephrase this as:
(vi) Everyone is a sophomore .
Definition 1.2.11 The phrase "for every x" is called a universal quantifier and denoted by
(∀ x)∨(x ).
Note: The phrase "for every x," "for all x," and "for each x" have same meaning.
Using this symbol we may symbolize (v) or (vi) as (∀ x)S (x ).
Definition1.2.12: The phrase "there exists an x" is called an existential quantifier and
denoted by(∃ x ).
Note. The phrase "there exists an x ," "for some x," and "for at least one x" have the same
meaning.
Thus, (∃x)S(x) is the symbolic form of "There are sophomores."
Examples
Using the universal quantifier, symbolize the statement
"Every rational number is a real number".
In axiomatic theory, the question “Is this statement true?” is not relevant. The Proper
question is, “Does this statement follow from the axioms by logic alone?”
Formal proof
In axiomatic theory, a formal proof is a finite sequences S1 , S 2 … , Sn of statements such that
each Si (1 ≤i ≤ n) is either an axiom or is inferred from one or more previous S j by a rule of
inference. The statements S1 , S 2 … , Sn are called the steps of the proof.
A theorem is a statement that is the last step of some proof. To prove a theorem means to
produce a proof whose last step is the theorem.
Every axiom is a theorem, because the finite sequence consisting of a single step-the axiom
itself- is a proof of the axiom.
In practice formal proofs are seldom given. Because a formal proof includes every step, the
formal proofs of simple theorems are often very long. The proofs in the mathematical
literature are usually informal (or semi-formal). Informal proofs are outlines, giving only
the mathematical high lights and suppressing the logical details. Of course, an informal
proof can in principle be changed on a formal proof if challenged.
Proof by contradiction
Often we are unable to give a formal proof of a theorem. When this happens, we frequently
turn to a method of proof called proof by contradiction. This method relies on the fact that
if ( ⌝ p ) is true. Hence to prove that p is true. We attempt to show that ( ⌝ p ) is false. The best
way to accomplish this is to show that ( ⌝ p ) is not consistent with the axioms and proven
theorems.
Proof Existence
For theorems of the form ( ∃ x ) p ( x ) , we can frequently give a proof by exhibiting an
example. For instance, consider the following theorem:
Theorem
Every equation of the form ax +b=0 , where a ≠ 0 , has solution in the system of real
numbers.
−b
The proof of this theorem amounts to checking that x= has the required property.
a
Disproof by contradiction
If we have tried unsuccessfully to prove a conjectured theorem, we may well spend some
time trying to disprove it. One of the usual methods of disproof is to assume that the
theorem is true and then to derive consequences from this. If we succeed in arriving at a
consequence which contradicts a known true theorem, we have shown that the conjectured
theorem is false. This process is similar to the method of proof by contradiction.
Disproof by Counter-example
When we are considering a conjecture of the form ( ∀ x ) P ( x ), we may also consider its
negation ( ∃ x ) ( ⌝ p ( x ) ). It may be possible to find a specific individual ‘A’ so that ⌝ P (A ) is
true. If so we have shown that the negation of our conjecture is true and hence that the
conjecture is false.
Review exercises
1. Translate the following composite sentences into symbolic notation, using letters to stand
for the prime components (which here we understand to mean sentences which contain no
connectives).
I will go either by bus or by taxi.
Neither the North nor the South won the Civil War.
If I am either tired or hungry, then I cannot study.
2. Suppose that the statements P, Q, R, and S are assigned the truth values T, F, F, and T,
Summary
Logic is the analysis and assessment of arguments to clarifies reasoning and separate
good from bad reasoning (which is called the validity of argument).
Statement calculus and predicate calculus are one of the important concepts to analysis and
judge the validity of arguments logically.
Logic is applicable to areas such as: law, politics, journalism, education, medicine,
business, science, mathematics, computer science, and others.
The connective such as and, or, if…, then…., and if and only if, and a word not are used to
formulate composite sentence from prime components.
A formula A (composed statement) whose value is T, for all possible truth values of its
prime components is called valid and denoted by⊨A.
If a formula A is not valid its truth value is determined by using truth table.
A formula A equivalent to formula B iff they have the same truth value and denoted by
A eq B .
An argument (or formula) A is said to be valid by the rule of inference iff each of the
premise of the argument are truth value are T.
Suppose B is the consequence (conclusion) of the premises A’s, to verify this we have two
rules, those are:
A formulas such that either each E is a premise (rule p) and Preceding formulas in the
sequence such that if C is their conjunction, then ⊨C ⟶ E (rule t ).
In everyday language we use the quantifier such as: Universal quantifier such as “for every
x," "for all x," and "for each x”, and Existential quantifier such as "there exists an x," "for
some x," and "for at least one x".
The formula B is a consequence of formulas A1, A2,… , An (in the predicate calculus),
symbolized by A1, A2,…, An ⊨B, iff for each domain D and for each assignment to the A's
in D the formula B receives the value T whenever each A receives the value T.
Reference
Ademe Mekonen(2007),Logic and Set theory, Department of Mathematics, AAU.
Anteneh and Geremew(2012), Logic and Set theory, Department of computational
sciences, AKU.
Harry J. Gensler, (2010),Introduction to Logic, 2nd Ed., published by Routledge 270
Madison Ave, New York, NY10016
M.L.Bettinger(1982), Logic, Proof, and Set, Edison-Wesley.
Michael Potter(2004), Set Theory and its Philosophy, Oxford University, Published in the
United States by Oxford University Press Inc. , NewYork.
Peter T. Johnstone(1987),Notes on logic and set theory, Cambridge University Press.
Robert R.Stoll(1963), Set Theory and Logic, Cleveland State University, Dover
Publications, Inc. NewYork.
Seymour Lipschutz(1965),schaum’s outline of theory and problems of general
topology,Temple University,published in the New York by Mcgraw-Hill Book Company.
Willardvan Orman Quine(1969), Set theory and its logic, 2nd Ed. , Harvard University,
Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, England.
Chapter two
Set Theory
Introduction to cantor’s concept of a set
Georg Cantor’s (1845–1918) was the German Mathematician who studied the theory
of sets as a mathematical discipline. Cantor’s investigation of questions applicable to
trigonometric series and series of real numbers led him to recognize the need for a means
of comparing the magnitude of infinite sets of numbers.
Thus, cantor’s, define a set S as any collection of defined, distinguishable object of
our intuition or of our intellect to be conceived as a whole. The object are called the
elements or members of S. Distinguishable indicate any pair of objects qualified to appear
as element of a particular set , one must be able to determine whether they are different or
the same. Definite meaning that if given a set and an object is, or is not, a member of the
set. The implication is that a set is completely determined by its members.
Moreover, in this chapter the concept of intuitive set theory, axiomatic set theory
(Inclusion), the primitive notion and axioms (operations for Sets) ,algebra of set ,
relation ,function , Classification of sets and cardinal numbers were discussed with brief
definition and examples
Objectives:
At the end this chapter you will be able to :
recognize the intuitive set theory,
understand the axiomatic approach of set theory,
know the primitive notion and axioms,
understand the algebra of set,
understand the relation,
recognize the ordered pair,
develop function,
determine equivalence relation,
understand the order relation,
Apply counting principles in classification of sets,
Understand the notion of cardinal of a set.
2.1. Review of sets and set operations, ordered pairs, relations and
functions
Definition 2.1.1: A Set is a collection or group of objects or elements or members(cantor
1895).
Note:
One can determine whether or not that object is a member of that set .The resulting
sentence is capable of being classified as true or false.
The membership is a relation between objects and sets and denoted by ∈ and we write
x ∈ A if the object x is a member of set A.
If x is not a member of set A we shall write x ∉ A.
Further, if x 1 , x 2… x n ∈ A we will abbreviate as x i ∈ A for i=1,2,… , n.
Equal Sets
Definition 2.1.2: When two sets A and B consist of the same elements, they are called
equal and we shall write A=B.To indicate that A and B are not equal, we
shall write A≠B.
Basic properties of set: Let A , B ,∧C be any sets
A=B implies B= A ,
A=B∧B=C imply A=C for all sets A , B∧C .
Examples
When A ={Ashenafi,Biruk,Solano} and B={Solano, Biruk, Ashenafi},then A=B. Note that
a variation in the order in which the elements of a set are tabulated is immaterial.
When A={1,4,5} and B={1,1,4,5,4},then A=B since each element of A is in B and each
element B is in A. Note that a set is not changed by repeating one or more of its elements.
When A={1,2} and B={1,2,3,4},then A≠B since 3 and 4 are elements of B but not A.
{{1 ,3 },{2 , 4 },{5 ,6 }}; is a set with three members, namely,{1 , 3 }, {2 , 4 }, and {5 , 6 }.
The sets {{1 ,2 },{2, 3 }}and{1 , 2 ,3 }are unequal, since the former has {1 , 2 }∧{2 , 3} as
members, and the latter has 1, 2, and 3 as members.
Activities
1. Explain why 2 ∈{1 , 2 , 3}.
Is{1 , 2 }∈{{1 , 2, 3 },{1, 3 }, 1 , 2}? Justify your answer.
Axiomatic set theory; Inclusion
Definition 2.1.3: Let A∧B be are sets, then A⊂of B , denoted by A ⊆ B, iff each member
of A is a member of B.
Note:
In other word, A is a⊂of B . Further, we agree that Bincludes A , denoted by B⊇ A , is
synonymous with A is included∈ B .
Thus, A ⊆ B∧B ⊇ A each means that, for all x ,if x ∈ A , then x ∈ B .
The negation of A ⊆ B is written A ⊈ B states that there is an x ∈ A such that x ∉ B .
Example: Consider the set A={1,3,5,7,...} B={5,10,15,20,...}
C={x: x is prime, x>2} = {3,5,7,9,…}
Then C ⊆ A Since every prime number greater than 2 is odd. On the other hand, B ⊈ A
since 10∈ B but 10∉ A .
Example: We will let N denote the set of natural numbers, Z denote the set of integer
numbers, Q denote the of rational numbers, R denote the of real numbers. Accordingly,
N ⊆Z ⊆Q ⊆ R
Observe that N ⊆ Z does not exclude the possibility that N=Z.
Note that: Two sets A and B are equal iff A ⊆ B∧B ⊇ A .
Definition 2.1.4: The set A is properly⊂of B, symbolized by A ⊂ B iff A ⊆ B but A ≠ B .
For example, The set of natural number N is properly included in the set Z of integers and
denoted by N ⊂ Z , and the set Q of rational numbers properly includes Z and denotedQ ⊂ Z .
Some basic properties of the inclusion:
A⊆ A;
A ⊆ B∧B ⊆ C imply A ⊆ C ;
A ⊆ B∧B ⊆ A imply A=B .
Definition 2.1.5: The empty or the null set ∅ is the set having no elements.
Property: The empty set∅ is a subset of every set.
Proof: Let A be a set, and ∅ be empty set.
Since ∅ has no members, the condition is automatically fulfilled.
An alternative proof indirect one, assume that it is false that ∅ ⊆ A . This case only if there
exists some member of ∅ which is not a member of A. But this is impossible, since ∅ has
no members. Hence, ∅ ⊆ A is not false; that is, ∅ ⊆ A ∎
Note: Each set A ≠ ∅ has at least two distinct subsets, A∧ ∅ .
Definition 2.1.10: The absolute complement or, simply, complement of a set A, denoted by
A ,is the set of elements which do not belong to A, written as A=¿ { x │ x ∈ U , x ∉ A }.
In other words, A is the difference of the universal set U and A.
For example, Let A={ 1,3,6,7,8}, B={4,6} and U={1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8} then A is{2,4,5}
Definition 2.1.11: The relative complement of a set B with respect to a set A or, simply the
difference of A and B, denoted by A −¿B, is the set of elements which belong to A but
which do not belong to B. In other words,
A−¿B={ x|x ∈ A , x∉ B }
Observe that A−¿B and B are disjoint, i.e. (A−¿B) ¿ B=∅
Note. U −A={ x ∈U │ x ∉ A }, is the set of those members of U which are not members of
A.
B
A A B A
'
A shaded A ⋂ B shaded A ⋃ B shaded
Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3
Disjoint sets are represented by non-overlapping regions, and inclusion is depicted by
displaying one region lying entirely within another.
Examples
Suppose A and B are given sets such that A−B=B− A=∅ . Can the relation of A ¿ B be
expressed more simply? Since A - B = ∅ . means A ⋂ B=∅ the regions representing A∧B
do not overlap (Fig.4). Clearly, B́=B, so we conclude (Fig.5) that A ⊆ B. Conversely, if
A ⊆ B, it is clear that A−B=∅ . We conclude that A - B = ∅ iff A⊆ B. Interchanging
A and B gives B− A=0 iff B ⊆ A . Thus the given relations hold between
A∧Biff A ⊆ B∧B ⊆ A∨, A=B .
B
A A G L
Haile G/her (M.Sc.) & Solomon Shiferaw (B.Sc.) 37 AKU
F
Fundamental concepts of Algebra
10a. A¿
( A∩B )= A 10b.
A∩( A∪B ) =A
Proof (4a)
(⟹)WTS: A ⋃ (B ⋂ C)⊆( A ⋃ B) ⋂ ( A ⋃ C) .
Let x ∈ A ⋃ (B ⋂ C).then x ∈ Aor x ∈ B ⋂ C .If x ∈ A , then x ∈ A ⋃ B
and x ∈ A ⋃ C , and hence x is a member of their intersection. If x ∈ B ⋂ C ., then
x ∈ B∧x ∈ C .Hence x ∈ A ⋃ B∧x ∈ A ⋃ C , so x ∈( A ⋃ B) ⋂ (A ⋃ C) .
(⇐) WTS: ( A ⋃ B) ⋂ ( A ⋃ C)⊆ A ⋃ (B ⋂ C). Let x ∈( A ⋃ B) ⋂ (A ⋃ C).
Then x ∈ A ⋃ Band x ∈ A ⋃ C .Hence x ∈ A ,∨x ∈ B∧x ∈C .These imply that
x ∈ A ⋃ (B ⋂ C). Hence, the result∎
Theorem 2.1.14 The following statements about sets A and B are equivalent to one
another.
A⊆B.
A⋂ B =A.
A⋃ B =B.
Proof: (I)⟹ (II). Assume that A⊆B. Since, for all A and B, A⋂ B ⊆A, it is sufficient to
prove that A⊆A⋂ B. But if x ∈ A, then x ∈B and, hence, x ∈A⋂ B. Hence A ⊆ A⋂ B.
(II) ⟹ (III). Assume A ⋂ B = A.
Then A⋃ B=(A⋂ B)⋃ B= (A⋃ B)⋂ (B⋃ B)
= (A⋃ B)⋂ B=B.
(III) ⟹ (I). Assume that A ⋃ B = B. Then this and the identity A⊆A⋃ B imply A⊆B ∎
Examples
With the aid of the identities the complex expressions involving sets can be simplified as in
elementary algebra. For instance,
R= { ⟨1,2⟩ ,⟨1,3⟩,⟨2,3⟩ }
in X={1,2,3}. Then the domain of R={1,2},the range of R={2,3},and
X ×Y ={│ x ∈ X∧ y ∈Y }
Example: let X ={1,2,3} and Y ={a,b}.Then
x
x
x
{ ( x , y ) ∈ R × R| y=x } , { ( x , y ) ∈ R × R| y ≥ x } , {(x , y )∈ R × R │0 ≤ x ≤ 2 ⋀ 0 ≤ y ≤ 1}
Fig. 7 Fig. 8 Fig. 9
Activities
1. Show that if (x , y , z)=(u , v , w), then x=u , y=v ,∧z=w .
2. Write the members of (1, 2) × (2, 3, 4). What are the domain and range of this relation?
What is its graph?
Function
We have seen the definition of the graph (a relation) is a set of ordered pairs. Thus,
a function is a relation such that no two distinct members have the same first coordinate.
Definition 2.2.5: A Function f is a rule that assigns to each element in a set X one and only
one element in a set Y.if f assigns the value y to the element x in X, we write
y =f(x)
and call y the image of x under f.The set X is the domain of f,and the set of all images f(x)
is the range of f.
if x≤ y ,then it is not true that y≤ x .This means x R y does not imply y R x.Thus R is not
symmetric.
Note:
If a relation R∈X is an equivalence relation in X , then D R=X .
Example
Each of the following relations is an equivalence relation on the accompanying set.
The relation of having the same number of members in a collection of finite sets.
Equality in a collection of sets.
Activities
1. Give an example of these relations.
a) A relation which is reflexive and symmetric but not transitive.
b) A relation which is reflexive and transitive but not symmetric.
c) A relation which is symmetric and transitive but not reflexive in some set.
2. Let R ={(x,y)∈ Z , x− y is a multiple of 5 }
a) Is R an equivalence relation
{
2 n if n>0
1 if n=0
Define f: Z→ N by f(n)= 1−2 n if n<0
f is a one-to-one correspondence.
Hence, Z N
Countability
Finite and Infinite sets
Definition 2.3.2: A set is finite iff it is empty or equivalent to {1,2,…,n} for some n∈
N;otherwise it is said to be infinite(not finite). Clearly two finite sets are equivalent iff they
contain the same number of elements.
Roughly, finite set is one whose elements are exhausted if counted successively but of
an infinite set the elements cannot be exhausted by counting.For example, the set
{1,2,3,4,5} is finite and the set R and C are both infinite.
Remark: No set is both finite and infinite.
Countable and uncountable sets
Definition 2.3.3: A set is said to be countable
-if it is finite
-if it is countably infinite (denumerable)
i.e. the set S said to be countable if S N (if there exists a mapping f: N
S such that f is both one-to-one and onto).
A set S is called uncountable if it is not countable (non-denumerable)
If a set S is countable, we can write down in succession the elements of S corresponding to
the natural numbers s1,s2,s3,…such an arrangement is called an enumeration of S.
1 2 3 4
, , , ,. ..
Example: let A= { 3 4 5 6 }
Show that A is countable
x
Define f: N→ A by f(x)= x+2
Let a, b ∈ A
If f(a)=f(b)
a b
=
a+2 b+2
a=b
-f is one-to-one
∀ y∈ A ,∋ x∈ N such that
x 2y
y= ⇒ x=
x+2 1− y
- f is also onto function.
-f is 1-1 correspondence
Therefore A is countable (A→ N )
Theorem 2.3.4: i) every subset of a countable set is finite or countable, i.e.denumerable.
ii) if a set is equivalent to a countable set, then it is countable.
iii) The union of a finite set and a countable set is countable.
iv) The union of countably many countable sets is countable.
v) The Cartesian product of two countable sets is countable.
Proof : ( left as exercises)
Theorem 2.3.5: prove the following
The set Z is countable.
The set Q is countable
Proof i) Define f: Z
→ N as
{
2 n if n>0
1 if n=0
f(n)= 1−2 n if n<0
f is a one-to-one correspondence(bijective) and Z is countable.
1 2 3 4 5
, , , , , .. .
ii) Let Q1={ 2 2 2 2 2 }
1 2 3 4 5
, , , , ,. ..
Q2 = { 3 3 3 3 3 }
1 2 3 4 5
, , , , ,. . .
Q3 = { 4 4 4 4 4 }
1 2 3 4 5
, , , , ,. . .
Qn={ n+1 n+2 n+3 n+4 n+5 }
Observe that Q=¿ Qi each Qi is countable.
Activities
1. prove the following
The set (0, 1) is uncountable.
The set R is uncountable.
iii. The set I is uncountable.
iv. The set Q+ and Q- is countable.
Cardinal arithmetic
Proposition 2.4.5. Suppose that a , b , c are cardinals.
a+(b+ c)=(a+ b)+c .
a+ b=b+a .
a+ 0=a.
a ≥ b ⇔(∃ d)(a=b +d ).
If b ≤ c , then a+ b ≤ a+c .
(ab)c=a(bc ).
ab=ba .
a 0=0 a , a 1=a , a 2=a+ a.
a (b+ c)=ab+ac .
b ≤ c ⇒ ab ≤ ac .
b c bc
(a ) =a .
c c c
(ab) =a b .
b+c b c
a =a a .
0 1 2
a =1 , a =a ,a =aa .
If a ≤ b and c ≤ d , then a c ≤ bd .
Proof . The proofs are all straightforward. ∎
Review exercises
1. Try to develop a set which is a member of itself.
2. Give an example of sets A , B ,∧C such that A ∈ B , B ∈C ,∧ A ∉C .
3. Prove each of the following for sets A, B, and C.
a. If A ⊆ B∧B ⊆ C , then A ⊆ C .
b. If A ⊆ B∧B ⊂ C , then A ⊂ C .
c. If A ⊂ B∧B ⊆ C , then A ⊂ C .
d. If A ⊂ B∧B ⊂ C , then A ⊂ C .
4. Prove that for all sets A, B, and C, ( A ⋂ B ) ∪ C= A ⋂ ( B ∪ C ) iff C ⊆ A .
5. Prove that for all sets A, B, and C, ( A−B)−C=( A−C)−(B−C).
6. Show that for every set A , A + A=∅ ∧ A+ ∅ =A .
7. With the aid of a Venn diagram investigate the validity of each of the following
inferences:
a. If A, B, and C are subsets of U such that A ⋂ B ⊆ C and A ∪ C ⊆ B, then A⋂ C=∅ .
b. If A, B, and C are subsets of U such that A ⊆ B∪C and B ⊆ A ∪ C , then B = ∅ .
8. Prove that if A, B, and C are sets such that A ≠ ∅ , B ≠ ∅ , and
( A × B) ⋃ (B × A)=C ×C ,then A=B=C .
9. Show that A is finite iff there exists a function f on A such that the only f –closed
subsets of A are Ø and A itself.
10. Show that if A is finite then ℘ ( A ) is finite.
11. Find the cardinalities of the following sets:
a. The set of subsets of N with more than one element.
b. The set of infinite subsets of N .
Summary
A Set is a collection or group of objects or elements or members(cantor 1895).
If the object x is a member of set A it is denoted by x ∈ A and if not it is write by x ∉ A.
Let A∧B be are sets, then A⊂of B , denoted by A ⊆ B, iff each member of
A is a member of Band also denoted by B⊇ A ,which is B includes A.
The set A is properly subset of B, symbolized by A ⊂ B iff A ⊆ B but A ≠ B .
The empty or the null set ∅ is the set having no elements.
The empty set∅ is a subset of every set and also the set A ≠ ∅ has at least two distinct
subsets, A∧ ∅ .
The set ℘ ( A)={B │ B ⊆ A } is called power set of set A and has 2n members if A has n
members.
A ⋃ B={ x|x ∈ A∨x ∈ B } is the union of set A and B.
A B= { x|x ∈ A∧x ∈ B } is the intersection of set A and B.
Two sets A and B will be called disjoint or non-intersecting if they have no element in
common, that is, if A ⋂ B=∅ .
The symmetric difference of sets A and B, symbolized by A + B (some books use a symbol
A ∆ B), is defined as: A+ B= ( A−B ) ⋃ (B− A) .
A relation is used in connection with pairs of objects considered in a definite order.
An object joined together with defined order is called ordered pair.
Cartesian product is a set of all pairs (x , y ), such that x ∈ X ∧ y ∈ Y and denoted by X ×Y .
Written as X ×Y ={(x , y )│ x ∈ X∧ y ∈Y }.
Functions are relations between the elements of two sets.
A function f: X→ Y is said to be injective or one-to-one if distinct elements of X have
distinct images under f ,i.e. x1¿ x2 implies f(x1)¿ f(x2).
A function f: X→ Y is said to be surjective or onto if Y is the range of f,i.e.to every y in
Y there exists an x in X such that y=f(x),i.e.=f(x).
A bijective function is often referred to as a one to one correspondence if it is both one-to-
one and onto function.
A relation R in a set X is said to be equivalence relations iff R is Reflexive , Symmetric
and Transitive.
Reference
Ademe Mekonen(2007),Logic and Set theory, Department of Mathematics, AAU.
Anteneh and Geremew(2012), Logic and Set theory, Department of computational
sciences, AKU.
Harry J. Gensler, (2010),Introduction to Logic, 2nd Ed., published by Routledge 270
Madison Ave, New York, NY10016
M.L.Bettinger(1982), Logic, Proof, and Set, Edison-Wesley.
Michael Potter(2004), Set Theory and its Philosophy, Oxford University, Published in the
United States by Oxford University Press Inc. , NewYork.
Peter T. Johnstone(1987),Notes on logic and set theory, Cambridge University Press.
Robert R.Stoll(1963), Set Theory and Logic, Cleveland State University, Dover
Publications, Inc. NewYork.
Seymour Lipschutz(1965),schaum’s outline of theory and problems of general
topology,Temple University,published in the New York by Mcgraw-Hill Book
Company.
Chapter 3
Groups
Introduction
In this chapter, we shall consider in some detail the algebraic structure which will be of
primary concern to us throughout, namely the notion of a group. Actually the reader has
come in contact, during his or her mathematical career, with specific examples of groups as
will be seen by the examples we shall give. All these examples have features in common
which are desirable to axiomatize. When we prove results for the general structure, they
apply automatically to all the specific examples.
Objectives:
At the end of this chapter you will able to:
Define binary operation on a non empty set.
Define algebraic structures.
Identify associative and commutative algebraic structures.
Define homomorphism, isomorphism, monomorphism and epimorphism between
algebraic structures.
Give definition of group and give examples of groups.
Find an identity element of a group.
Find the inverse of each element of a group.
Identify commutative and non commutative groups.
Define a permutation group.
Define a subgroup of a group.
Show that a non empty subset of a group can be a subgroup of a group.
Define cyclic groups and find subsets generated by an element of the group.
Define normal subgroup and quotient subgroup.
State and prove Lagrange’s theorem.
Can you define binary operations, Algebraic structures, groups and their
properties?
¿
(( ) )
xy
3
z
¿
3
¿ ( x ⨁ y ) ⨁ z ¿.
Hence , ( Q , ⨁ ) is an associative algebraic structure.
Definition 3.1.4
Let ( S , ∆ , ∇ ) be an algebraic structure. Then we say
∆ is left-distributive over ∇ if a ∆ ( b ∇ c )= ( a ∆ b ) ∇ ( a ∆ c ) ∀ a , b , c ∈ S
∆ is right –distributive over ∆ if ( a ∇ b ) ∆ c= ( a ∆ c ) ∇ ( b ∆ c ) ∀ a , b , c ∈ S
∆ is distributive over ∇ is both right and left distributive over ∇
Examples
Consider ( N ,+, ∙ ) .Then , ∙ is both left and right distributive over +.
Let S be any non-empty set. Consider( p ( S ) ,∪ ,∩ ). Then,∪ is both left and right
distributive over ∩ and ∩ is both left and right distributive over ∪ .
Activity
1. Show that multiplication is a binary operation on S¿ { 1 ,−1 , i,−i } where i=√ −1
2. State which of the following are binary operations.
a. On Z defined a∗b=ab
a
b. On Q defined a∗b=
b
c. On R defined a∗b=b
d. On R defined a∗b=± ab
e. On N defined a∗b=a2 +b2 −2 ab
3. If a set A has n members, then what is the number of binary operations on A?
4. Determine whether the following are algebraic structures and decide which of them
commutative and / or associative algebraic structures.
a. ( R , ∆ ) where x ∆ y=x +3 y
b. ( R , ∆ ) where x ∆ y=¿min{ 3 , y }
xy
c. ( R , ∆ ) where x ∆ y=
√5
d. ( R , ∆ ) where x ∆ y=x y
e. ( R , ∆ ) where x ∆ y=2 x+ y
xy
f. ( Q , ∆ ) where x ∆ y=
3
5. Let Z be the set of integers. Prove or disprove that the usual multiplication is left-
distributive over each of the following.
a. Subtraction
b. a ∆ b=a+b+1 ∀ a , b ∈ Z , a∗b=a+ b−ab ∀ a , b ∈ Z
3.2 Identity element and inverses
Definition 3.2.1
Let ( S , ∆ ) be an algebraic structure. An element e ∈ S is said to be
a left identity element for ∆ if and only if
e ∆ x=x for all x ∈ S
a right identity if and only if
x ∆ e=x for all x ∈ S
an identity if and only if
x ∆ e=e ∆ x=x for all x ∈ s
Here, e is an identity for ∆ if and only if e is a right and a left identity for ∆ .
Examples:
¿ is an algebraic structure with an identity e=0 because for all x in Z .
we see x +0=0+ x=x
The algebraic structure ( R , ∙ ) ( where ∙ is multiplication of real numbers) has an identity
e=1 because for all x∈ R , x ∙ 1=1 ∙ x=x
xy
Let S=Q−{ 0 } , defined on ∆ by x ∆ y= , ∀ x, y∈S .
5
Find an identity element (is it exists)
Solution:
For all x ∈ S , we have,
5. x
5 ∆ x= =x=x ∆ 5
5
Hence 5 is an identity for ∆ in S.
Remark:
All algebraic structures mayn’t contain an identity element.
Example:
¿ is an algebraic structure but has no identity element.
Consider the binary operations ∆ defined on S= { 1, 2 } by the following table.
∆ 1 2
1 1 2
2 1 1
Then it is easy to show that there is no identity element for ∆ in S .
Theorem 3.2.2 (uniqueness of an identity)
There exists at most one identity element for a binary operation ∆ on S .
Proof: we proof by contradiction.
Suppose e and e ' are identity elements for ∆ ∈S ,
' '
e ∆ e =e , since e is anidentity element .
Also e ∆ e ' =e , since e ' is an identity element.
Therefore e ' =e ,i.e we proved that there is at most one identity element.
Definition 3.2.3
Let ( S , ∆ ) be an algebraic structure x ∈ S is invertible ( has an inverse) if
The identity element for ∆ exists ; and
∃ y ∈ S such that x ∆ y =e= y ∆ x .
y is called the inverse of x for ∆.
Examples:
Consider the algebraic structure ( R−{ 0 } , ∙ ) .
1
Then for any x ∈ S , y= ∈ R− { 0 } and x . y = y . x=1
x
Hence, each elements of R−{ 0 } is invertible.
Consider the algebraic structure( Z , ∙ ) . Then the only invertible elements are 1and -1.
Notation:
Let ( S , ∆ )be an algebraic structure. If x has an inverse, then the inverse is denoted by x−1 .
Theorem 3.2.4 (uniqueness of an inverse)
Let ( S , ∆ ) be an associative algebraic structure. Then, x ∈ S has at most one inverse.
Proof:
Let y∧z are inverses of x for ∆ . Then
z=z ∆ e=z ∆ ( x ∆ y )=( z ∆ x ) ∆ y=e ∆ y= y
Example: . the following is an example of non-associative binary operation in which the
inverse of an element is not unique.
∆ 0 1 2
0 0 1 2
1 1 0 0
2 2 0 0
0 is the identity element for ∆ , ∆ is not associative
Since ( 2 ∆ 2 ) ∆ 1=0 ∆ 1=1∧¿ 2 ∆ ( 2 ∆ 1 )=2 ∆ 0=2
But 1 ∆ 1=0∧1 ∆ 2=0=2 ∆ 1
Hence 1 has no unique inverse.
Theorem 3.2.5
−1
Let ( S , ∆ ) be associative algebraic structure. If x ∈ S isinvertible then ( x−1 ) = x
Proof:
Since ∆ is an associative binary operation .If x is invertible then its inverse is unique.
−1
Let it be x−1 , again x−1 has a unique inverse ( x−1 ) . But x is also an inverse of x−1.
−1
By the uniqueness of x−1 it follows that ( x−1 ) =x .
Theorem 3.2.6
Let ( S , ∆ ) be an associative algebraic structure. If x∧ y are invertible elements, then
x ∆ y is invertible and its inverse ( x ∆ y )−1= y −1 ∆ x −1 .
Proof: Let x∧ y be invertible elements of S . Then x−1∧ y −1 are the inverses of
x∧ y respectively .
Since x−1∧ y −1 are in S and S is closed under∆ .
−1 −1 −1 −1
x ∆ y ∧y ∆ x
Then ( x ∆ y ) ∆ ( y−1 ∆ x−1 )=[ ( x ∆ y ) ∆ y −1 ] ∆ x−1
¿[x ∆( y ∆ y )]∆x
−1 −1
−1
¿[ x ∆e]∆ x
−1
¿x∆x
¿e
Similarly, it is easy to show that ( y −1 ∆ x−1 ) ∆ ( x ∆ y )
Therefore, we conclude that ( x ∆ y )−1= y −1 ∆ x −1
Theorem 3.2.7
Let ( S , ∆ ) be an associative algebraic structure and x , y , z ∈ S .Then
If both x and y commute with z, then x ∆ y also commutes with z .
If x commutes with y and if both x∧ y are invertible , then x−1 commutes with y −1 .
If x commutes with y and y is invertible , then x commutes y −1 .
Proof:
Suppose the assumption in (1) is true. Then,
z ∆ ( x ∆ y )=( z ∆ x ) ∆ y
¿(x ∆ z)∆ y
¿ x ∆(z ∆ y)
¿ x ∆( y ∆ z)
¿(x ∆ y)∆ z
Then we get that z ∆ ( x ∆ y )=( x ∆ y ) ∆ z
Suppose the assumption in (2) is true. Then,
−1 −1 −1
x ∆ y =( y ∆ x )
−1
¿(x ∆ y)
−1 −1
¿y ∆x
Hence x−1 ∆ y−1= y −1 ∆ x −1
Let x , y ∈ S such that y is invertible and x ∆ y= y ∆ x .Then
x ∆ y−1=e ∆ ( x ∆ y−1 )
¿ ( y −1 ∆ y ) ∆ ( x ∆ y −1)
¿ y−1 ∆ [ ( y ∆ x ) ∆ y−1 ]
¿ y−1 ∆ [ ( x ∆ y ) y−1 ]
¿ ( y −1 ∆ x ) ∆ ( y ∆ y −1)
¿ ( y −1 ∆ x ) ∆ e
−1
¿y ∆x
Hence, we get x ∆ y−1= y −1 ∆ x
Activity 2
1. Let x, y and z be invertible elements of an algebraic structure ( S , ∆ ) .
Show that
−1
[( x ∆ y) ∆ z] =z ∆ ( y ∆ x ) if x , y∧z are invertible .
−1 −1 −1
3.3. Morphisms
Definition 3.3.1
Let ( E , ∆ ) and ¿ be algebraic structures with one binary operation.
Example:
Let f :¿ . Show that f is an isomorphism.
Proof: Let x , y ∈ R . Then we see that ,f
( x+ y )
f ( x + y )=3
x y
¿3 ∙3
¿ f (x)∙f ( y)
Therefore, f is homomorphism. ------------- (1)
Let x , y ∈ R such that f ( x )=f ( y )
Then, f ( x )=f ( y ) ⟺3 x =3 y
x y
⇔ log 3 3 =log 3 3
⇔ x= y
Hence, f is injective. ----------------------- (2)
Now we will show that f is surjective . For this let y ∈ R+¿ ¿. Then we see that log 3 y ∈ R .
More, it is easy to see that f ( log 3 y )= y .
Hence, f is surjective. -------------------- (3)
Therefore, by (1),(2) and (3) , we conclude that f is an isomorphism.
Note: Let ( E , ∆ ) and ¿ be algebraic structures then we say that they are isomorphic if and
only if there exists a bijective function between ( E , ∆ ) and ¿
In this case, we write (E,∆) ≅ ¿
Definition 3.3.4
Let ( E , ∆ ) and ¿ be two algebraic structures.
Let f : ( E , ∆ ) → ¿ be an isomorphism. Then :
If ∆ is associative so is ¿ .
If ∆ iscommutative so is ¿ .
If e is the identity element for ∆ , then f ( e ) is the identity element for¿ .
−1
If x ∈ E is invertible for ∆ , then f ( x ) is invertible for ¿ and f ( x −1) =( f ( x ) )
Proof: Let x ' , y ' , z ' ∈ F such that f ( x )=x ' , f ( y )= y ' ∧f ( z )=z ' for some x , y , z ∈ E.
( x '∗y ' )∗z' = [ f ( x )∗f ( y ) ]∗f ( z )
¿ f ( x ∆ y )∗f ( z )
¿ f [( x ∆ y) ∆ z]
¿ f [ x ∆ ( y ∆ z )]
¿ f ( x )∗f ( y ∆ z )
¿ f ( x )∗[ f ( y )∗f ( z ) ]
Activity
1. Consider A={ 6 n/n ∈ Z } and B=Z . Then , give an isomorphism between ¿
2. Let A=( 0 , 1 )∧B=(−1 , 0 ) . Then
a) Give a bijective function from A to B.
b) Give a bijective function from B to A.
xy
3. Define “¿ on R , x∗y= , then
11
a) Give an isomorphism from ¿
b) Give the image of 11 using the function defined in (a).
c) Find the inverse of 52 in ¿
d) Find the inverse of 52 in ( R , ∙ )
4. Let C be the set of all continuous functions defined in some subset D of R .
5. Defined “¿ on C by for f , g ∈C , ( f ∗g )( x )=f ( x ) . g ( x ) for all x ∈ D. Then,
a) Find the identity element of “¿ in C.
b) What elements of C are invertible?
1
6. Find the inverse of f ( x )= for x ≠ 0 .
x
7. Is the function f ( x )=0 for all x ∈ D investible ?
+¿ ¿
8. Consider the two algebraic structures ¿ where R is the set of real numbers, R is the set of
positive real numbers and + and ∙ are the usual addition and multiplication.
9. Let f :¿ , such that f ( x )=10 x .
a) Is f a homomorphism ? an epimorphism? a monomorphism? an isomorphism?
10. Prove that ¿
{
aa … a if n positive
n
a = (−a ) (−a ) … (−a ) if n isnegative
e if n=0
d. A group with a binary operation ¿ on it is usually denoted by G.
Theorem 3.4.3:
Let G be a group . Then,
Notation:
We shall denote elements of the group Z n by 0,1, 2,…,n−1 instead of denoting by
0 , 1 ,2 , … , n−1
Example:
Construct the addition modulo 3 for Z n={ 0 , 1 ,2 }
⨁ 0 1 2
0 0 1 2
1 1 1 0
2 0 0 1
1. Let α ∈ S n such that α ( ai )=r i wherer i is any one of the values for i= 1,2,3…,n. Then , we
say denoteα by the following notation.
i.e.α = ( a1 a2 a3 … an
r1 r2 r3 … r n ) this means α maps ai ¿ r i for i=1 ,2 , 3 , 4 … n.
Example:
Consider the symmetric group of 2 objects, i.e . s2 .Then , list the elements of S2.
Here , we consider the set A to be { 1 , 2 }. Then recall that S2 is the set of all bijective
functions from A to A.
Then α = (11 22) and β=(12 21) are the only elements of S . 2
α=(11 2 3
2 3
, ) α= (12 2 3
1 3
, γ= ) (
1 2 3
1 3 2
, )
λ=(
1)
θ=( )1 , ω=( 13 21 32)
1 2 3 1 2 3
,
3 2 2 3
are the only elements of S3 .
Example: Consider the symmetric group of three elements, i.e S3 .
Let α = (11 2 3
2 3 ) (
, β=
1 2 3
2 1 3
, γ=
1 2 3
1 3 2 ) ( )
Find αοβ , βοα , βογ ∧γοβ
Solution:
α ( β ( 1 ) )=α ( 2 )=2 and β ( γ ( 1 ) )=β ( 1 )=2
α ( β ( 2 ) ) =α ( 1 )=1 β ( γ ( 2 ) )=β ( 1 )=3
α ( β ( 3 ) ) =α ( 3 )=3 β ( γ ( 3 ) )= β ( 1 )=1
Hence using the above notation, we have that
αοβ =( 12 2 3
1 3 ) and βογ = ( 12 23 31)
βοα =(
3)
γοβ =(
3 1 2)
1 2 3 1 2 3
2 1
Therefore βογ ≠ γοβ , i.e S3 is non-abelian group with 6 elements.
Remark: For each n ∈ N , we have seen that Sn is non- abelian group. Therefore there are
infinitely many non-abelian groups.
Activity
1. Let S= { a+b √ 2 :a , b ∈Q } , Then
a) Show that ¿ is group.
2. Find the inverse of 1+ √ 2 ,2 √ 2 .
3. Find the identity element.
4. Define ∆ on R−( 0 ) as follows.
ab
For a , b ∈ R− {0 } , a ∆ b=
27
Then ,
Show that ( R−{ 0 } , ∆ ) is an abelian group
Find the identity element.
Give the inverse of 1,2,3,27,112
5. Let S be set of all polynomial with degree less than or equal to 2. We define, ∆ on S as
follows.
For f , g∈ S , ( f ∆ g ) ( x ) ≔ f ( x )+ g ( x ) for all x in the common domain of f ∧g .
Then ,
Show that ( S , ∆ ) is an abelian group.
6. Find the inverses of , f ( x )=2 x 2 +4 x +6 , g ( x )=−x +2∧¿ h ( x )=23
7. Construct the addition table for Z n, where n=1 ,2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 ,7 ,and find the inverses of
each of the element of Z n .
8. Find all the elements of Sn for n=3 , 4 , 5 , 6
9. How many elements does Sn for n=3 , 4 , 5 , 6
16. If G is a group such that ( ab )2=a2 b2 for every pair a , b ∈ G.Prove that G is abelian.
−1
a∈ H⟹a ∈ H;
Proof:
(⟹) If H is a subgroup, (1) and (2) clearly hold.
(⟹) Suppose (1) and (2) hold. Then we need only check b and c.
Leta , b , c ∈ H .Then a ,b , c ∈G .
Since G is group,a ( b c ) =( ab ) c . Hence G2 holds for H .
Let a ∈ H . Then by ( 2 ) , a−1 ∈ H . By (2) we obtain 1=a a−1 ∈ H . This proves ( c ) . Therefore
H is a group and hence a subgroup of G.
Corollary 3.5.1.3
Let G be a group. A non-empty subset H of G is a subgroup of G if and only if:
−1
a,b∈ H⟹a b∈ H
Proof:
(⟹): Assume that H is a subgroup of G. Then, H is a group and H ≠ ∅ .
Leta , b ∈ H ,then a−1 , b ∈ H . Since H isclosed , a−1 b ∈ H .
(⟸) Suppose a−1 b ∈ H ∀ a ,b ∈ H .
Let a ∈ H ,then e=a−1 a ∈ H . Hence , a−1=a−1 e ∈ H .Then by theorem 3.6.1 we conclude
that H a subgroup of G. This completes the proof of the theorem.
Example :
Consider( Z 4 , ⨁ 4 ) . Recall that( Z 4 , ⨁ 4 ) is abelian group.
Let H¿ { 0 , 2 }, then we use theorem 3.6.1 to verify that H ≤ Z 4
H is non-empty.
0+2=2∈ H , 0+0 ∈ H ∧2+ 2=0 ∈ H
The inverse of 0 is 0 and the inverse of 2 is 2.
Therefore, H= { 0 ,2 } is a subgroup of G .
Corollary 3.5.1.4:
Let G be a group and H , K be its sub groups. Then, H ∩ K is also a subgroup.
Proof:
Suppose H and K are subgroups of G. Then , H and K are non-empty subsets of G. Let
x , y ∈ H ∩ K . Then x , y ∈ H∧x , y ∈ K .
Since H and K are subgroups of G.
Then , ( x−1 y ) a=( a x−1 a−1 y ) a=( a x−1 a−1 ) ( ya )=( a x−1 y ) ( a−1 a )=a ( x−1 y ) … (¿∗¿)
Therefore from (¿∗¿) we see that ( x−1 y ) a=a ( x−1 y ) . Hence by the definition ofC ( a ), we
conclude that x−1 y ∈ C ( a ) . This prove C ( a ) is a subgroup of G .
Definition 3.5.1.8
Let G be a group. Then the center of G usually denoted by Z ( G ) is defined by
Z ( G )= { x ∈G : xg=gx for all g ∈G }
Theorem 3.5.1.9
Z ( G ) is agroup of G .
Proof: Since the identity element e commutes with every g in G , we have that Z ( G ) ≠ ∅ .
Let x , y ∈ Z (G ) . Then , for all g ∈ G , xg=gx∧ yg=gy
−1 −1 −1 −1
⟹ y=gy g i . e y =g y g
−1 −1 −1
Hence , x y g=xg y g g
−1 −1
¿ gx y g g
−1
¿ gx y
Therefore, x y−1 ∈ Z ( G ) ,i . e Z ( G ) is a subgroup of G.
Corollary 3.5.1.10
For any group G, Z ( G )=G if ∧only if G is abelian group.
Proof: Suppose that Z ( G )=G . Then for any x , y ∈ Z ( G ) , xg=gx∧¿
gy= yg for all g ∈G .
In particular, xy= yx if we replace g by y .
Hence, G is abelian.
Suppose that G is abelian group.
By the definition of Z ( G ) , it is clear that Z ( G ) ⊆G∧we will show that G ⊆ Z ( G ) .
Let now y ∈G , then for any x ∈G , we have that xy = yx ,i . e . y ∈ Z ( G ) .
Hence, G ⊆ Z ( G ) .This shows that G=Z ( G )..
Theorem 3.5.1.11
Let G be a group and let a ∈ G. Then H= { an :n ∈ Z } is a sub group of G and is the smallest
subgroup of G that contains a, that is every subgroup containing a contains H. This sub
group H of G is called the subgroup of G generated by an element a and usually denoted
¿ a> .
Proof:
Let x , y ∈H. Then x=a m , y =ak for some m , k ∈ Z
m n m +n
xy=a a =a ∈ H since m+k ∈ Z
Thus H is closed under the group operation of G.
Notice that x−1=a−m . Hence x −1 ∈ H .
Thus by Theorem 3.6.2 H is a subgroup of G.
Now we will show that it is the smallest subgroup of G containing a.
Let K be a subgroup of G containing a and K is a subset of H. Then we will show that
H=K
Let x ∈ H , then there exists n in N such that x=an
K= ⟨ 3 ⟩={ 3 n :n ∈ Z }= { 0 ,1 , 2 ,3 , }
M = ⟨ 1 ⟩ ={ 1n : n∈ Z } =Z 4
Definition 3.5.1.12
Let H be a group. Then , H is said to be cyclic group if and only if there exists an element
a in H such that H= { an :n ∈ Z } .
In this case, (H is generated by a ) a is called the generator of H and we write H= ⟨ a ⟩ .
If H is a subgroup of G , then H is called acyclic subgroup of G.
Example:
The group ¿ is cyclic group . Both 1 and -1 are the only generators for the group.
( Z 4 , ⨁4 ) is also a cyclic group both 1&3 are generators, i.e ⟨ 1 ⟩= ⟨ 3 ⟩ =Z 4
For n ∈ Z +¿¿ , the group Z n under addition modulo n, cyclic . If n>1 , then both 1 & n-1 are
generators, but there may be others.
Theorem 3.5.1.13
If a group G is cyclic, then G is abelian group.
Proof: suppose G is cyclic group. Then by definition of cyclic group, there exists a in G
such that for each x ∈ G , x=a n for each n∈ Z .
Let now x , y ∈G . Then x =an ∧ y=a m for some n , m∈ Z
Now, xy=an am =an +m=a m+n =am a n= yx
Hence, this shows that G is abelian group.
Theorem 3.5.1.14
α= (12 2 3
3 1
, ) β= (11 2 3
3 2 )
and γ = (
1 2 3
3 2 1 )
Find the orders of α , β∧γ .
Solution: αοα =α =
2
(12 )(
2 3
3 1
ο )(
1 2 3
2 3 1
= )
1 2 3
3 1 2
a =( ) ο( )=(
1 2 3)
3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3
2 3 1 3 1 2
Which is the identity in S3 .
Therefore, the order of α is 3.
In the group of non- zero rational numbers (operation multiplication), 2 has infinite order
because 2n ≠1 for every positive integer n.
The word order has been used in two senses; the order of a group and the order of an
element. The next theorem shows how the two are related.
Theorem 3.5.1.16
Let G be a group and H be a subgroup of G. If H= ⟨ a ⟩ and H is finite group, then the order
of H is the order of a . (left as exercise)
Theorem 3.5.1.17
Let G be a finite cyclic group generated by a. If o ( G ) =n , then:
m
a ≠ e , for any positiveinteger m<n .
{ a , a2 , … , a n−1 , a n=e } is precisely the set of elements belonging to G.
Proof:
Suppose m<n∧am =e . Let x ∈ G .Then x=ak for some integers k. By Division Algorism,
∃unique integers q, r such that k =qm+r and 0 ≤ r <m . Then
m q
=( a ) a =e a =e a =a .
k qm+r r q r r r
x=a =a
Hence, every element of G is of the form a r, where 0 ≤ r <m.
Hence G has at most m elements, wherem<n . Contradiction.
We know that the elements a , a 2 , … , a n−1 , an all belong to G. Next we show that these
elements are distinct. Suppose a i=a j for some positive integers i< j ≤ n . Then multiplying
by a−i, we get:
0 i−i i −i j −i j−i
e=a =a =a a =a a =a
and since i< j ≤ n , we must have 0< j−i<n . But by (1) above,
m 2 n−1 n
a ≠ e for m<n . Contradiction. Thus the elements a , a , … , a , a are all distinct. Since
o(G)¿ n , then G must be precisely the set { a , a2 , … , a n−1 , a n }.
However, since G is a group, e ∈ G . But a m ≠ e if m< n. Hence, a n=e .
Theorem 3.5.1.18.
Every subgroup of a cyclic group is cyclic.
Activity
1. Determine the elements in each of the cyclic subgroups of S3 . Also give the order of each
elements of S3 .
2. Show that ({ 11 )(
2 3 , 1 2 3
2 3 1 3 2 )} is a subgroup of s .
3
8. Let G be an abelian group show that the set { a∈ G: an=e for some n ∈ Z } is a subgroup
of G.
9. Let G be a group and let Z (G)={x ∈ G: xg=gx for all g ∈ G} . Prove that Z (G) is a
subgroup of G, called the center of G.
10. Let G be a group for a ∈ G, define c ( a ) ={ga :g ∈ G} prove that c (a) is a subgroup of
G.
3.5.2. Cosets and Lagrange’s Theorem
Definition 3.5.2.1.
Let G be a group and let H be a subgroup of G, then Ha={ha∨h ∈ H } is called the right
coset of H in G determined by a.
The element a is often called a representative of the right coset Ha.
Similarly, aH ={ ah|h∈ H } is called the left cosets of H in G. Of course, if G is abelian
Ha=aH for all a ∈ G.
Example
Consider Z 4= {0 , 1 , 2, 3 } and its sub-group H={0 , 2} we will compute all the right cosets
of H in Z 4 .
HO=H 2={ 0 , 2 }
H 1=H 3= {1 , 3 }
There are two distinct right cosects of H in Z 4. Observe that, in fact, these distinct right
cosets of H form a partition of Z 4 .
Let G=Z nad H =¿ 7>¿ then
H +3=¿ 7>+3={… ,−14 ,−7 , 0 ,7 , 14 , … }+3
¿ {… ,−11,−4 ,3 , 10 ,17 , …}
This is the congruence class 3 in Z7
Let G=S 3 and H={(1),(1 ,2)}. Then
H ( 1 )={ ( 1 ) ( 1 ) , ( 1 , 2 ) (1 ) }={ (1 ) ,(1 , 2)}
H ( 1 ,2 , 3 )= { (1 )( 1 , 2, 3 ) , ( 1 ,2 ) ( 1 ,2 , 3 ) } ={( 1 , 2, 3 ) ,(2 , 3)}
H ( 1 ,2 , 3 )= { (1 )( 1 , 3 ,2 ) , ( 1 ,2 ) ( 1 ,3 , 2 ) } ={( 1 , 2, 3 ) ,(1 , 3)}
Exhibit the left cosets and the right cosets of the subgroup 3 Z of Z .
Solution:
Our notation here is additive, so the coset of 3 Z containing m is m+3 z. Taking m=0 , we
see that 3 Z ={… ,−9 ,−6 ,−3 , 0 , 3 ,6 ,9 , … }is it self one of its left cosets, the coset
containing 0. To find another left coset, we select an element of Z not in 3 Z , say 1, and
find the left coset containing it. We have
1+3 Z ={… ,−8 ,−5 ,−2 ,1 , 4 ,7 , 10 , … }
These two left cosets, 3 Z and 1+3 Z , do not yert exhavst Z . For example, 2 is in neither of
them. The left coset containing 2 is
2+3 Z ={… ,−7 ,−4 ,−1, 2 , 5 ,8 , 11, … }
It is clear that these three left cosets we have found do exhaust Z , so they constitute the
partition of Z into left cosets of 3 Z . Since Z is abelian, the left coset m+3 Z and the right
cosect 3 Z +m are the same. So the partion of Z into right cosets is the same.
For a subgroup H of an abelian group G, the partion of G into left cosets of H and the
partion into right coseots are the same.
The group Z 6 is abelian. Find the partion of Z 6 into cosets of the subgroup
H={0 , 3 }
Solution:
One coset is {0 ,3 } itself. The coset containing 1 is 1+{0 ,3 }={1, 4 }. The coset containing
2+{0 ,3 }={2 ,5 } since {0 ,3 },{1 , 4 } and {2 , 5 } exhaust all of Z 6, these are all the cosets.
Theorem 3.5.2.2.
Let G be a group, H be a subgroup of G and a , b ∈ G. Then
( 1 ) Ha=H ⟺ a ∈ H
( 2 ) Ha=Hb⟺ a b−1 ∈ H
( 3 ) aH =bH ⟺ a−1 b ∈ H
Proof
Now Ha=H ⟹ ea ∈ Ha=H as e ∈ H
⟹a∈H
i .e . Ha=H ⟺ a ∈ H
( ⟸ ) Let a ∈ H , then ha ∈ H ∀ h ∈ H as H is a subgroup, so by definition H a ⊆ H . Now for
any h ∈ H , h=( h a−1 ) a∈ Ha. This yields H ⊆ Ha
Thus Ha=H
Hence Ha=H ⟺ a ∈ H
Ha=Hb ⟹ a∈ Hb Since a=ea ∈ Ha
⟹ a=hb for some h ∈ H
⟹ Ha=H ( hb )= ( Hh ) b
¿ Hb ,Since Hh=H by (1 )
The proof (3) is similar to that of (2)
Definition 3.5.2 .3
Let G be a group and H is a subgroup of G. For a , b ∈ G we say a is congruent to b modulo
H, written as a ≡ b ( modH ) , if ab−1 ∈ H
Note “Congruence modulo H is a relation on G
Theorem 3.5.2.4.
Hence, a ≡ c ( modH )
Therefore, the reflexive, symmetric and transitive properties hold and a ≡ b(modH ) is an
equivalence relation on G.
Remark
If G=Z and H=nZ , then the relation a ≡ b ( modH ) , i.e. a b−1 ∈ H , under the addition
notationn, reads a−b is a multiple of n. This is the usual number theoretical congruence
modulon.
Since the set of right cosets of H in G are simply the equivalence classes of an equivalence
relation on G, we immediately obtain the following theorem.
Theorem 3.5.2.5.
Let G be a group and let H be a subgroup of G. Then the set of all right cosets of H in G
form a partition of G. Hence every element of G belongs to one and only one right cosect
of H in G. i.e. any two right cosects of H in G are either identical or have no elements in
common.
Corollary 3.5.2.6
There is a 1-1 correspondence between any two right cosets of H in G.
Theorem 3.5.2.7. ( Lagrange)
If H is a subgroup of a finite group G, then the order of H is a divisor of the order of G
(i . e . 0(H )∨0 ( G ) ).
Proof
Let n=0 ( G ) ,m=0(H ) Let K=¿ the number of distinct right cosets of H in G.
By (3.5−6.6∧3.5−6.7 ¿ any two distinct right cosets of H in G have no element in
common and each has m elements.
Hence n=mk
Therefore 0 ( H )∨0(G)
Example
Since S3 has order 3 !=6, any subgroup of S3 must have order 1 , 2, 3 or 6: S3 can not have
subgroups of order 4 or 5. A group of order 7 can have any the two obvious subgroups {e }
of order and the group it self of order 7.
Definition 3.5.2.8
Let G be a group and H is subgroup of G . The number of distinct right cosets of H in G is
called the index of H in G . The symbol i G ( H ) denotes the index of H in G .
By Lagrang’s Theorem, in case G is a finite group
0 (G)
i G ( H )=
0(H)
Definition 3.5.2.9
If G is a group and a ∈ G, the order (or period) if a is the least positive integer m such that
m
a =e . If no such integer exists, we say that a is infinite order. We use the notation 0(a)
for the order of a.
Note that o( a )=o ( H ) where H=¿ a>¿
Corollary 3.5.2.10
If G is a finite group a ∈ G, then the order of a is divisor of the order of G.
( i . e . o(a)∨o (G) )
Proof:
We know o ( a )=o ( H ) , where H= ⟨ a ⟩ . We also know by lag rage’s theorem o ( H ) /o ( G )
Corollary 3.5. 2.11 :
If G is a finite group of order n, then a n=e for all a ∈G .
Proof:
Let m=0 (H ) from the above corollary 1
n=mk for some positive integer k.
k
Thus a n=a mk =( a m ) =e k =e since a n=e
Corollary 3.5.2.12
If G is a finite group of order p where p is a prime number, then G is cyclic and every
elements of G except the identity element is a generator of G.
Proof
Let e ≠ a∈ G by corollary 1, 0 ( a )∨ p. Since p is prime and 0 ( a )> 1, 0 ( a )= p. Hence the
cyclic subgroup generated by any element of G other than the identity e has order p and
therefore must be all of G.
Corollary 3.5.2.13
A group G of prime order contains no subgroup other than {e } and G.
Proof
This is a direct consequences of Lagrangels Theorem, since a prime has not positive
divisor other than 1 and itself.
Activity
1. Let n be a positive integer. List all right cosets of nZ in Z.
2. Let G be a group, 0 ( G )=12 . What is the maximum number of proper subgroup G can
have? If G has subgroup of order 2 and 3, what is the minimum number of proper
subgroups G can have
3. Let G be an abelian group, H <G , K <G , with 0 ( H )=5 and 0 ( K )=7 . Prove that there
exists an element in G of order 35
4. Let R[ x ] be the set of all polynomials over the reals and L be the set of all polynomials in
R[ x ] of degree 1 or less.
5. In R [ x ] , is 3 x 2 ≡ ( 1+ 2 x 2 ) ( modl ) ?
7. In R[ x ], is x 2 ≡ ( 1+ x+ x 2 ) ( modl ) ?
8. Find all cosets of the subgroup 4 Z of 2 Z
9. Find all cosets of the subgroup ¿ 4 >¿ of Z12
10. Let δ=( 1 , 2 ,5 , 4 ) ( 2, 3 ) ∈S 5 . Find the index of ¿ δ >¿ in S5
11. Let G=S 3 and H=¿ (1 , 3 ) >¿
Determine the right cosets of H in G.
Determine the left cosets of H in G.
Verify that the collection of right cosets is different from the collecton of left cosets
3.6. Normal subgroups and quotient groups
3.6.1. Definition
Definition 3.6.7.
G
Let G be a group and let N ≤G . Then we define ={Nx : x ∈ G }. In other words, G/ N is
N
the collection of all right cosets of N in G.
Theorem 3.6.8
Let G be a group and let N ≤G . Then G/ N is a group under the operation 0 defined by
Na 0 Nb=Nab ∀ Na , Nb ∈G/ N
Proof
First we shall prove that the binary operation is well defined in G/ N .
Let a 1 ∈ N a∧b 1 ∈ N b
⟹ a1=n1 a∧b 1=n2 b for some n1 , n2 ∈ N
−1 −1
⟹ a=n1 a1∧b=n2 b1
⟹ ab=( n−1
1 a1 )( n2 b1 )
−1
1 ( a1 n2 ) b1
¿ n−1 −1
−1
¿ n1 ( n 3 a 1 ) b 1
¿ ( n−1
1 n3 ) a1 b1 ∈ N a1 b1
⟹ ab ∈ N a1 b 1
But ab ∈ Nab
Therefore Nab=N a 1 b 1
Hence, 0 is well defined
Closure
Na 0 Nb=Nab∈ G/N (because Nab is also a right coset). Hence G/ N is closed under 0.
Associativity
Nao(NboNc)=Nao(Nbc)
¿ Na ( bc )
¿ N ( ab ) c
¿ NaboNc
¿ ( NaoNb ) oNc ∀ Na , Nb , Nc ∈G/ N
Hence o is associative.
Existence of Identity
Let e be the identity of G. Then
Ne=N NeoNa=Nea=Na∧NaoNe =Nae=Na ∀ Na ∈G/ N . Hence Ne is the identity
element of G/N.
Existence of Inverses
Let Na∈ G/ N . Then Nao Na−1=Naa−1=Ne=N N a−1 oNa=Na−1 a=Ne=N
Therefore ( Na )−1=Na−1
Hence (G/ N , o) forms a group.
Definition 3.6.9
The group (G/ N , o) is called the quotient group or the factor group of G by N . A factor
group G/ N is called proper if N ≠G∧N ≠{e }.
Corollary 3.6.10
If G is a finite group and N ≤G , then
o ( GN )= oo(( GN ))
Proof
The elements of G/ N are subsets of G . If G is finite, then the order of G/ N is the number
of right cosets of N in G that is i G (N ) the index of N in G . From Lagrange’s theorem.
o(G)
i G ( N )=
o (H )
o ( GN )= oo(G)
(N)
Example: considerG/ N for G=S 3 and N=¿(1 , 2, 3)>. We have
N= { ( 1 ) , ( 1 , 2 ,3 ) , ( 1 ,3 , 2 ) } ≤ G3 and o ( SN )= 63 =2
3
Theorem 4.6.11.
Every subgroup of an abelian group is normal .
Example
Let G=Z then ¿ is a group
Let N=3 Z={… ,−9 ,−6 ,−3 ,0 , 3 , 6 , 9 , … }
N is a cyclic subgroup generated by 3. Therefore, G is an abelian group.
Hence N ≤G .
Consider the group ¿, since ¿ is an abelian group , every subgroup is normal and in
particular H is a normal subgroup of ¿
Activity
1. Let G be an abelian group and N , a subgroup of G . Prove that the quotient group G/ N is
abelian.
2. Let n be a positive integer and N=¿ n>¿ by the cyclic subgroup of the additive group Z of
integers. Show that o (Z /N )=n .
3. Let H be the subgroup of Z12 generated by 3. List the cosets of H in Z12 and construct a
table for Z12∨H
4. Consider the group G={1 ,−1 ,i ,−i } under multiplication of real numbers
5. Let H={1 ,−1 }. Then ,
a) Find the quotient group
b) Find the number of elements in the quotient group
c) What is the identity element in the quotient group?
d) Find the inverse of each element in the quotient group?
3.7. Homomorphisms
Definition
Let G and G' be any two groups let ‘0’ and ‘¿’ denote their respective binary operations.
Then a mapping f :G → G' called a homomorphism if f ( aob )=f ( a )∗f ( b ) ∀ a , b ∈G .
Definition
Let f :G → G' be a homomorphism
If f is onto, f is called an epimorphism.
If f is one-to-one, f is called a monomorphism.
If f is both an epimorphism and a monomorphism then f is called an isomorphism. If f is
an isomorphism then G and G' are said to be isomorphic, & we write G ≅ G' .
For any groups G and G' , there is always atleast one homomorphism f :G → G' namely the
trivial homomorphism defined by f ( a )=e for all a ∈ G. Where e the identity in G' .
Example
Consider Z, the additive group of integers and G={2n : n∈ Z }
G is a group under the usual multiplication of real numbers.
Define f : Z → G by f ( n )=2n ∀ n∈ Z
Since f ( n+ m )=2n+ m=2n .2 m=f ( n ) f ( m ) ∀ n , m∈ Z
f is a homomorphism of Z in to G . Clearly f is onto and G is a homorphic image of Z .
Let G be the multiplicative group of all non singular nxn matrices over the real numbers.
¿
Let R be the multiplicative group of all non zero real numbers.
Define f :G → R ¿ by f ( A )=detA for all A ∈G . Since for any two nxn matrices
A , B det( AB)=detA . det B we get f ( AB)=f ( A)f (B)
Hence f is a homomorphism of G into R¿ . f is also onto
This proves that ker f is a subgroup of G . It remains to show that it is also normal.
Now f ( x−1 ax )=f ( x−1 ) f ( a ) f ( x )
−1
¿ f ( x ) f (a ) f (x )
−1 '
¿ f (x) e f (x)
−1
¿ f (x) f ( x )
'
¿e
Consequently x−1 ax ∈ ker f
Hence ker f is normal subgroup of G .
Theorem
Let f :G → G' be a homorphism. Then
f is an epimorphism if and only if ℑ( f )=G '
f is a monomorphism if and only if ker (f )={e }.
Where e is the identity element in G.
Proof
It is obvious
Suppose f is a monomorphism. Let a ∈ ker {f }. Then f ( e )=e' . Where e ' is the identity
element in G' . But f ( e )=e' . Hence f ( a )=f ( e ) . Since f is one-to-one, a=e . Therefore
ker (f )={e }.
Suppose ker(f)={e}. Let a,b∈G such that f(a)=f(b). Then
e 1=f ( a ) f ( b ) =f ( a b−1 )=f ( a b−1 ) ⟹ a b−1 ∈ker f
−1
−1
⟹ a b =e ⟹ a=b . Hence, f is monomorphism
Theorem
Let f :G → G' be an ephimorphism.
Then G ' ≅ G/ ker (f )
Proof
Review exercise
1. Let ( X , ⨁ ) be an algebraic structure where ⨁ is defined on X =¿ as follows.
For x , y in X, x ⨁ y=Min {x , y }. Show that ⨁ has no identity element in X.
Unit Summary
An algebraic structure can have at most one identity element
An associative algebraic structure can have at most one inverse (if possible) for each
element of the algebraic structure ¿
The product of invertible element is also an invertible element
Two algebraic structures are said to be isomorphic if and only if there is an isomorphism
between them.
The composition of isomorphisms is also an isomorphism
The group of all bijective functions from a non empty set x to x is called the permutation
group
If two algebraic structures are said to be isomorphic, then both are commutative and
associative
Let ∝: ¿ be isomorphism and x be in X. then, x is invertible if and only if ∝(x) is invertivel
and [∝ ( x ) ]−1=∝ ( x−1 )
For any group G, and a , b in G, if a and b are invertible, thena , b is also invetible
Ever finite semigroup which satisfies all the cancellation laws is also a group
The group of addition modulo for any positive integer n, is an abelian group
Permutation group is a non-abelian group
Let G be a group and H be a non empty subset of G. Then H is a subgroup of G if and only
if for all x , y ∈ H , xy−1 ∈ H
The intersection of any collection of subgroups (normal subgroups) is also a subgroup
(normal subgroup)
Let G be a group and a ∈ G. Then,
C ( a )={ x ∈G /xa=ax } is called the centralizer of a
Z ( G )={x ∈ G/ xg=gx for all g ∈ G } is called the center of G
C (a) and Z (G) are subgroups of a group G
A group is abelian if and only if Z ( G )=G
Let a ∈ G and H= { an /n ∈ N } . Then, H is a subgroup of G and is called the smallest
subgroup of G containing a.
A subgroup of cyclic group is also cyclic
A group of prime order is cyclic
Cyclic group is always abelian group
References
Demissu Gemeda and Seid Mohammed ,(2008),fundamental concepts of algebra, Dept. of
Mathematics,AAU
Durabin ,J.R. (2005). Modern Algebra, An introduction, 6 th ed., John Wily&Sons, New
york
Fraleigh,J.B. (2003). A First Course In Abstract Algebra, 7th ,ed. ,Addison Wesley-World
Student Series.
Sing , S. & Zameerudin, Q. (1990). Modern Algebra, 3rd ed.,Vikas Publishing House,New
Delhi.
Chapter 4
Rings
Introduction
Many sets are naturally endowed with two binary operations: addition and multiplication.
Examples that quickly come to mind are the integers, the integers modulo n, the real
numbers, matrices, and polynomials. When considering these sets as groups, we simply
used addition and ignored multiplication. In many instances, however, one wishes to take
into account both addition and multiplication. One abstract concept that does this is a ring.
This notion was originated in the mid-nineteenth century by Richard Dedekind.
Objectives:
At the end of this chapter you will able to:
State the definition of rings and give some examples.
Discuss some elementary properties of rings and apply them to solve some related
problems.
Describe some types of rings such as division ring, commutative rings integral domain and
fields.
Explain sub rings and characteristic of ring.
Define ideals and quotient rings.
Explain what is meant by ring homomorphism.
Discuss on polynomial rings.
Define prime ideals.
4.1. Definitions of Rings and examples
Definition 4.1.1.
Let R be any non-empty set with two binary operations+¿ ⋅. Then (R ,+, ⋅) is said to be a
ring if and only if
¿ is an abelian group
⋅ is associative in R
Let, a , b , c ∈ R . Then, a∗( b∗c )=a∗ ( bc3 )= abc9 and ( a∗b )∗c=( ab3 )∗c= abc9
Hence, ( a∗b )∗c=a∗(b∗c ) for all a , b , c ∈ R . i.e. *is associative in R .
Distributive property of * over +.
Let a , b , c ∈ R . Then
a ( b+ c ) ab+ ac ab ac
a∗( b+ c )= = = + =( a∗b )+ ( a∗c )
3 3 3 3
( a+b ) c ac +bc ac bc
Similarly, ( a+ b )∗c= = = + = ( a∗c )+(a∗c )
3 3 3 3
Hence, * is distributive over +.
Therefore by 1,2 and 3 above, ¿ is a ring.
Definition 4.1.2.
Let (R ,+, ⋅) be a ring. We say:
( R ,+, ⋅ ) is a commutative ring if a ⋅b=b ⋅ a for all a , b ∈ R .
If ∃u ∈ R such that a ⋅u=u ⋅a=a ∀ a ∈ R , then it is easy to show that u is unique. u is called
a unity element of R and is often denoted by 1 and (R ,+, ⋅) is called a ring with unity.
( R ,+, ⋅ ) is called a division ring if it is a ring with unity and for each non-zero a ∈ R , ∃ and
element b ∈ R such that a ⋅b=b ⋅ a=1.
(R ,+, ⋅) is called a field if it is a commutative division ring.
Example
(Z ,+ ,⋅) is a commutative ring with unity.
(Q ,+, ⋅) and (R ,+, ⋅) are fields.
(Z n , ⨁ n ,⨀ n) is a commutative ring with unity.
(Z 7 , ⨁ 7 ,⨀ 7) is a field.
(Z 6 , ⨁ 6 , ⨀6 ) is not a field.
Elementary Properties of Ring
Theorem 4.1.3.
Let (R ,+, ⋅) be a ring. Then, for all a , b , c ∈ R , we have:
a ⋅0=0 ⋅a=0.
a ⋅ (−b )=(−a ) ⋅ b=−( ab ) .
( – a ) ⋅ (−b ) =ab .
(−1 ) ⋅ ( a ) =−a , if R has unity element 1.
(−1 ) ⋅ (−1 )=1 , if R has unity element 1.
P roof
Observe that a ⋅0=a ⋅ ( 0+ 0 )=a⋅ 0+a ⋅0
Therefore, 0=a ⋅0+ [−(a ⋅0) ] = { a ⋅0+a ⋅0 }+ [ −(a ⋅ 0) ]
¿ a ⋅0+ {a ⋅0+ [− ( a ⋅0 ) ] }
¿ a ⋅0+ 0
¿ a ⋅0.
Observe that 0=a ⋅0=a ⋅ [ b+(−b) ] =a ⋅b+a ⋅ (−b ) .
Then (S ,+, ⋅) is a ring where + and ⋅ are the usual addition and multiplication of
complex numbers.
4.2. Sub rings and characteristics of a ring
A non –empty subset S of a ring R is a sub ring of R if S itself is a ring with respect to the
binary operation of R.
Example :
The ring of even integers is a subring of the ring of all integers. The ring of integers is a
subring of the ring of rational numbers. If R is any ring , then R is a subring and { 0 } is
asubring.
Theorem 4.2.1
Let R be a ring and let S be a non –empty subset of R. Then S is a subring of R if and only
if
a , b ∈ S ⟹ a+ b ∈ S∧a ∙ b ∈ S ;∧¿
a ∈ S ⟹−a ∈ S
Proof:
(⟹): If S is a subring of R, clearly (1) and (2)
(⟸): Suppose (1) and (2) hold
Since a , b ∈ S ⟹ a+ b ∈ S∧−a ∈ S , it follows that S is a subgroup of R under the additive
binary operation of R. Moreover, the additive binary operation of R is commutative in R
and hence in S. Therefore, S is an abelian group under the additive binary operation of R.
Since the multiplicative binary operation of R is associative on R, it is also associative on
S.
The multiplicative binary operation of R is both left and right distributive over the binary
operation of R. This still holds when we restrict the underlying set to S. Therefore, S is a
ring under the binary operation of R and , hence S is a subring of R.
Theorem 4.2.2:
Let R be a ring and m , n positive inte gers. Then for alla , b ∈ R the following holds:
m n m+ n
a a =a
n
( a m ) =amn
( m+n ) a=ma+na
m ( na )=( mn) a
( ma ) ( nb )= ( mn )( ab )=( na )( mb )
Proof (left as an exercise)
Definition 4.2.3:
Let R be a ring. If there exists a positive integer n such that na=0 for each a ∈ R ,the
smallest such positive integer is called the characteristic of R. If no such positive integer
exists, R is said to have a characteristic zero.
Notation: The characteristic of R is denoted by charR.
Example :
The ring Z n is of characteristic n, while Z , Q , R∧C all have characteristic 0.
Theorem 4.2.4
If R is a ring with unity, then R has characteristic n> 0 if and only if n is the smallest
positive integer such that ne=0 .
Proof:
( ⟹ ) suppose n> 0 is the characteristic of R. Then na=0 for all a ∈ R . In particular, n 1=0.
Suppose there is a positive integer m such that m<n and me=0. Then for each a ∈ R , we
have:
ma=a+a+ a+…+ a(m factors )
¿ a ⋅e +a ⋅ e+a ⋅ e+…+ a ⋅e ( m factors )
¿ a ⋅ ( e+e +e+ …+e )
¿ a ⋅ ( me )
¿ a ⋅0
¿ 0.
However, this contradicts the fact that n is the smallest positive integer such that na=0 for
each a ∈ R . Hence, n is the smallest positive integer such that n 1=0.
( ⟸ ) : Suppose n is the smallest positive integer such that n 1=0. Let a be any element of
R. Then:
na=a+ a+a+ …+a( n factors )
¿ a ⋅e +a ⋅ e+a ⋅ e+…+ a ⋅e ( n factors )
¿ a ⋅ ( e+e +e+ …+e )
¿ a ⋅ ( n 1)
¿ a ⋅0
¿ 0.
Activity
1. Which of the following become ring under addition and multiplication? If not why?
2. The set of positive integers.
3. The set of odd integers.
{ a+ b √ 2: a ,b ∈ Q }
4. Determine whether the following rings are commutative , division rings or not?
a) ( Z 6 ,+ ,∙ )
b) ( Z ,+ ,∙ )
c) ( Q ,+, ∙ )
d) ( Z 5 ,+ ,∙ )
5. Let * be defined on R−{ 0 } by :
ab
a∗b= , for a ,b ∈ R− { 0 }
√3
Then
a) Is ¿a commutative ring?
b) Is ¿a division ring?
4.3. Ideals and quotient rings
Definition 4.3.1
A non-empty subset I of a ring R is called
A left ideal of R if
a−b ∈ I for all a , b ∈ I
r a ∈ I for all r ∈ R , a ∈ I
and I is called a right ideal if
a−b ∈ I for all a , b ∈ I
ar ∈ I for all r ∈ R , a ∈ I
A non empty subset I of ring R is called an ideal (two sided ideal) if I is both left and right
ideal of R.
Example:
Let R be a ring. Then R and { 0 } are ideals of the ring.
Here R and { 0 } are trivial (improper) ideals of R. Any right , left or two sided ideal I of R ,
which is not equal to { 0 } and R is called a proper right , left or two –sided ideal of R.
Let E={ 2 m:m∈ Z } and consider the ring ( Z ,+ ,∙ )
Then for any x , y ∈ E ,r ∈ Z , we have
x− y =2 p−2 a
¿ 2 ( p−a )
¿ 2 h , h=p−a∈ Z i.e. x− y ∈ E
Moreover ,rx =r (2 p )=2 ( pr )=2 s ∈ E , for all r ∈ Z
and xr= ( 2 p ) r=2 ( pr ) ∈ E for all r ∈ Z
Hence, is a two sided ideal of the ring of integers.
Let S= { a+b √ 2 :a , b ∈ R } .Then , show that S is a two sided ideal of ( R ,+, ∙ )
Solution:
Let x , y ∈ S , then, x=a +b √ 2 ,a ,b ∈ R
y=a + b √2 , a , b ∈ R
' ' ' '
Suppose I contains a non –zero element, say x . If x is negative , then – x is positive and
−x ∈ I
Hence I contains a positive integer. Let a be the smallest positive integer contained in I.
Claim: I =( a ) , clearly ( a ) ⊆ I . Let b ∈ I , by division algorithm ∃ q , r ∈ Z such that
b=qa+r ∧0 ≤ r <a . But since I is an ideal and a ∈ I , qa ∈ I .
Thus r =b−qa belongs to I. Since a was the smallest positive integer belonging to I , we
must have r =0.
Hence , b=qa∧b ∈ ( a ) .Thus I ∈ ( a ) , Therefore , I =( a )
Quotient Rings
Ideals play approximately the same role in the theory of rings as normal subgroups do in
the theory of groups.
We now proceed to define the quotient ring of a ring R modulo an ideal of R.
Let R be a ring and let I be an ideal of R. Consider the additive group ¿ and the quotient
group R/I in which addition is given by:
( a+ I ) + ( b + I )=( a+b ) + I .
We wish to make the quotient group R/I into ring.
Theorem 4.3.4
If multiplication is defined by
( a+ I ) ( b+ I )=ab+ I
Then the quotient group R/I becomes a ring.
Proof
We first show that the multiplication given in R/I is well defined.
Suppose a+ I =a' + I and b+ I =b' + I .
Then, a=a ' + x andb=¿ b ' + y for some x , y ∈ I
⟹ ab=( a ' + x ) ( b' + y ) =a' b' + x b ' + a' y + xy
' ' ' '
⟹ ab−a b =x b +a y+ xy ∈ I
' '
⟹ ab+ I =a b I .
Therefore, ( a+ I ) ( b+ I )=( a' + I ) ( b' + I )
2.The multiplication is associative and distributive over addition .
Definition 4.3.5
If R is a ring, I is ideal of R, then the ring R/I is called the Quotient ring (or factor ring) of
R modulo I.
Example :
Let I ={ 6 n :n ∈ Z }. Then we have then before that I is an ideal of ( Z ,+ ,. ) .
Z
Then , ={ I ,1+ I ,2+ I ,3+ I , 4 + I , 5+ I }
I
Z
The is a ring called the ring of integers modulo 6 and multiplication modulo 6.
I
Activity
1. List all ideals of A12 .
2. Let S be the ring of all continuous functions from R into R with the usual addition and
multiplication of functions and let I ={ f ∈ S :f ( n )=0 ∀ n∈ N }
a) Show that I is an ideal of S.
b) If I 1∧I 2 are ideals of a ring R.
3. Prove that I 1 ∩ I 2 is an ideal of R. Give an example to show that I 1 ∪ I 2 need not be an
ideal of R.
4. Let I be an ideal of a ring R.
If a−b ∈ I ∧c−d ∈ I , prove that ac−bd ∈ I
5. Find the ideal generated by 2 in Z 8 .
6. Let S and W be rings. Define addition and multiplication on S ×W as follows:
( a , b )+ ( c , d ) =( a+c , b+d )
( a , b ) × ( c , d ) =( ac ,bd )
a) Prove that S ×W is a ring.
G. Prove that the intersection of arbitrary family of ideals is an ideal
H .Let a be fixed element of a ring R. Then show that I ={ x ∈ R :ax=0 } is an ideal of R.
Prove that the intersection of two left ideals of a ring is again a left ideal of the ring.
The set N of all 2x2 matrices of the form [ ab 00] for a , b integers is a left ideal but not a right
Proof
Let x , y ∈ Imf . Then ∃ a ,b ∈ R such that x=f ( a )∧ y=f (b). Then:
x + y=f ( a ) + f ( b )=f ( a+b ) ∈ Imf :
xy=f ( a ) f ( b )=f ( ab ) ∈ Imf .
−x=−f ( a )=f (−a ) ∈ Imf .
Hence, Imf is a sub ring of S.
Let a , b ∈ Kerf and let r ∈ R then:
f ( a+b )=f ( a )+ f ( b )=0+0=0
Therefore, a+ b ∈ Kerf .
f ( ab )=f ( a ) . f ( b )=0.0=0
Therefore, ab ∈ Kerf .
f (−a )=−f ( a ) =−0=0
Therefore, −a ∈ Kerf .
Thus, Kerf is a sub ring of R, and then
f ( ra )=f ( r ) f ( a ) =f ( r ) .0=0
f ( ar )=f ( a ) f ( r )=0. f ( r )=0
Therefore, ra , ar ∈ Kerf .
Hence, Kerf is a two-sided ideal of R.
Theorem 4.4.5
Let f : R → S be a homomorphism of a ring R into a ring S. Then:
If 1 is the unity of R, then f (1) is the unity of the subring Imf of S.
If R is a commutative ring, then Imf is a commutative ring.
Proof
Let x ∈ Imf . Then ∃ a∈ R such that x=f ( a ) . Then
f ( 1 ) x=f (1 ) f ( a )=f ( 1a )=f ( a )=x
xf ( 1 )=f ( a ) f ( 1 )=f ( a 1 )=f ( a )=x
Hence, f ( 1 ) x=x=xf ( 1 ) ∀ x ∈ Imf .
Therefore, f ( 1 ) is the unity of the subring imf of S.
Let x , y ∈imf . Then ∃a , b ∈ R such that x=f ( a ) and y=f ( b )
Then , xy=f ( a ) f ( b )=f ( ab )=f ( ba )=f ( b ) f ( a )= yx
Consider the ring Z of integers. We saw That every ideal of Z is of the form nZ , where n
is the smallest positive integer contained in the ideal.
Theorem 4.4.8
Let n be a positive integer grater than or equal to 2. Then Z n ≅ Z /nZ as rings.
Proof
Define ϕ :Z n → Z /nZ by ϕ ( a ) =a+nZ .
It is an easy exercise to show that ϕ is an isomorphism of rings.
Activity
1. Let f : S → W and g :W →T be ring homomorphisms. Prove that
gof :S → T is a ring homomorphism.
2. Let R be a ring with 1, and f : R → R be given by f ( x )=−x . is f a ring homomorphism?
3. Let S be the ring of polynomials over R and let r ∈ R . Let α r :S → R be defined by
α r ( f )=f (r ) for f ∈ S . Is α r a ring homomorphism?
4. Let f : Z 4 → Z 2 be given by f ( x )=x 2 . Is f a ring homomorphism?
Definition 4.5.2
Let R be a ring. We say that the cancellation laws hold in R if for a , b , c ∈ R , with a ≠ 0 ,
we have:
ab=ac ⟹ b=c
ba=ca ⟹ b=c
Theorem 4.5.3
Let R be a ring. The cancelation laws hold in R if and only if R has no left or right divisors
of zero.
Proof
( ⟹ ) Suppose the cancellation laws hold in R. Suppose ab=0 for some a , b ∈ R . We must
show that either a=0∨b=0. If a ≠ 0 then ab=a .0 implies that b=0. Similarly,
b ≠ 0 implies a=0 , so there can be no left or right divisors of zero.
( ⟸ ) Conversely, suppose R has no left or right divisors of zero. Suppose ab=ac with
a ≠ 0. Then ab−ac=a ( b−c )=0
Since a ≠ 0, we must have b−c=0 , i.e. b=c . A similar argument shows that ba=ca with
a ≠ 0 implies b=c .
Definition 4.5.4
An integral domain is a commutative ring with unity containing no divisors of zero.
Example
The rings Z , Q , R are integral domains. The ring Z12 is not an integral domain, although it
is a cumulating ring with unity.
The ring Z n is not an integral domain, if n is not a prime number. To see this, let m ∈ Z n ,
where m ≠0 and gcd (m , n)≠ 1. Let d=gcd (m, n).
m is a divisor of zero in Z n .
Every field is an integral domain. To see this, let F be a field. Suppose ab=0 for
a , b ∈ F , a ≠ 0.
Then, ad =bc
⟹ da=cb , since R is a commutative ring
⟹ ( c , d ) ( a ,b )
Therefore , is symmetric.
Suppose ( a , b ) , ( c , d ) ,(e , f )∈ E such that ( a , b ) (c ,d ) and ( c , d ) (e , f ) .
Then ad =bc and cf =de .
⟹ adf =bcf ∧bcf =bde (multiplying the first equation by f and the second by b)
⟹ adf =bde
⟹ afd=bed
⟹ af =be (by cancellation as d ≠ 0 ¿
⟹ ( a , b ) (e , f )
Therefore, is transitive.
Notation
a
We shall denote the equivalence class of (a ,b)∈ E by , i.e.
b
a
={ { ( c ,d ) ∈ E : ( c , d ) ( a , b ) } =( c ,d ) ∈ E : ad=bc }.
b
Let F=¿ The set of all equivalence classes of on E.
¿ {ba :a , b ∈ D ,b ≠ 0}
We define “addition” and “multiplication” on F by:
a c ad +bc
+ = ;∧¿
b d bd
a d ac a c
. = for all , ∈ F .
b d bd b d
Theorem 4.5.8
The “addition” and “multiplication” given above are well-defined.
Proof
' '
a a c c
Suppose = ' and = '
b b d d
Then ab ' =c d ' =c ' d … ( 1 )
Multiplying the first equation by dd ' and the second by bb ' we obtain
Definition 4.5.10
F is called the field of quotients of D (or the field of fractions of D).
Observe that in the special case when D is the ring of integers Z, the field F so constructed
above is the field of rational numbers Q. The field F so constructed could be regarded in
some sense as the smallest field containing D. This is obvious, since every field containing
a
D must contain all elements of the form for a , b ∈ D with b ≠ 0.
b
Activity
1. List all zero divisors of Z14 .
2. Let f : S → W be a ring isomorphism. Prove that if a ∈ S is a zero divisor , then f (a) is a
zero divisor in W.
3. Find the field of quotients of Z3 .
4. Let f : S → W be a ring homomorphism which is onto. If n ≠ 0 is the characteristic of S,
show that characteristic of W is non-zero and divides n .
The indeterminate x used in constructing R[x] can be any element such that an expression
of the form (*) equals the zero element of R if and only if a 0=a 1=…=an=0 . This
requirement on x is equivalent to the requirement that two polynomials in x are equal if
and only if the coefficients of like powers of x are equal.
Polynomials are added by adding coefficients of like powers of x . They are multiplied by
assuming that the laws of a commutative ring apply to all symbols present (the elements of
R, the powers of x , the +¿ sing, and the juxtaposition of the coefficients with powers of x ).
Before stating the formal definition that follows from this assumption, let us look at an
example.
ln Z [x ],
( 2 x+ 5 x 2 ) + ( 1−3 x2−x 3 )
¿ ( 0+ 2 x +5 x 2+0 x 3 ) ( 1+0 x + (−3 ) x 2+ (−1 ) x 3 )
2 3
¿ ( 0+1 ) + ( 2+ 0 ) x + ( 5−3 ) x + ( 0−1 ) x
2 3
¿ 1+2 x+2 x −x , and
( 2 x+ 5 x 2 ) ( 1−3 x 2−x 3 )=2 x ( 1−3 x 2−x 3 )+ 5 x 2 ( 1−3 x 2−x 3 )
¿ ( 2 x−6 x 3−2 x 4 ) + ( 5 x 2−15 x 4−5 x 5 )
2 3 4 5
¿ 2 x+5 x −6 x −17 x −5 x
Definition 4.6.2
Let
m
p ( x )=a 0+ a1 x +…+ am x
And
n
q ( x )=b0 +b 1 x +…+b n x
be polynomials over a commutative ring R. Then
n n +1 m
p ( x )+ q ( x )=( a 0+ b0 ) + ( a1 +b1 ) x +…+ ( an +b n) x +a n+1 x + …+a m x , for m ≥n
---------------------------------------------------------------------------- (1)
With a similar formula if m<n .
m+n
And p ( x ) q ( x ) =a0 b0 + ( a0 b1 +a 1 b 0 ) x +…+ am bn x --------- (2)
The coefficient of x k being
a 0 b k +a1 bk −1 +a 2 b k−2+ …+a k b 0
Example
In Z 4 [ x ]
q ( x )=0∧r ( x )=f ( x ) . Thusassume that m ≥n . If m=0 ,then f ( x )=a 0 and g ( x )=b 0 in this
case a 0=b 0 b−1 −1
0 a0 +0 ; hence we can take q ( x ) =b 0 a0 and r ( x ) =0
It remains to prove the statement fordeg f ( x )=m, on the basis of the induction hypothesis
that it is true whenever f ( x ) is replaced by a polynomial of degree less than m.
Let f 1 ( x )=f ( x )−am b−1
n x
m−n
g ( x ) . Then deg f 1 ( x ) < degf ( x ) .
Therefore, by induction hypothesis, there exist polynomials q 1 ( x ) and r 1 ( x ) such that :
f 1 ( x )=g ( x ) q1 ( x ) +r 1 ( x ) ,with r 1 ( x )=0∨deg r 1 ( x ) < deg g ( x ) .
This implies that :
−1 m−n
f ( x )=am bn x g ( x ) + g ( x ) q 1 ( x ) +r 1 ( x )
¿ g ( x ) [ am b−1
n x
m−n
+ q1 ( x ) ] +r 1 ( x ) .
( x 2 +2 x +1 ) + ( 2 x 2 + x+ 2 ) ∈¿ Z3 [ x ]
( 2 x 3+ x 2 +2 x+ 1 ) + (−x 3−x 2+ x−1 ) ∈Z 3 [ x ]
( 3 x+ 4 )+ ( 2 x 2 +2 x+ 2+ 2 ) ∈Z 6 [ x ]
( x 2 +2 x +2 )+( x−2 ) ∈Z 5 [ x ]
2. Which of the following polynomials are irreducible over Z5 [ x ] ? If reducible , factorize it.
a) x 2+ 3 x −3
b) x 3 +4 x +1
c) 2 x 2−x+ 4
3. Find the quotient and the remainder of
a) x 2+ x+2 when divided by ( x +1 ) ∈Z 3 .
{
1+1+…+1 ( n summands ) , if n>0
n 1 (−1 ) + (−1 )+ …+ (−1 ) (|n| summands ) ,if n<0
0 if n=0
Theorem 4.7.1
Let R be a ring with 1. Define ∅ :Z → R by ϕ ( n )=n1. Then ϕ is a homomorphism of rings.
Proof
ϕ ( m+ n )= ( m+ n ) 1=m1+n 1=ϕ ( m ) + ϕ ( n ) . Notice that by the distributive property in R, for
m , n>0 , and we have:
ϕ ( mn )=( mn ) 1=( m1 )( n 1 )=ϕ ( m ) ϕ ( n ) for, n> 0. Similar argument can be given for and
m , n∈ Z .
Corollary 4.7.2
If R is a ring with 1 and char R=n>1, then R contains a subring isomorphic to Z n . If cha
R=0, then R contains a subring isomorphic to Z.
Proof
Proof
Suppose char F=m>1. Then, by corollary 4.5.12, F contains a subring isomorphic to Z n .
Then n must be a prime number p, otherwise F would have zero divisors.
Suppose char F=0. Then, by corollary 4.5.12 F contains a subring isomorphic to Z. But any
field which contains Z contains Q. Hence, F contains a subfield isomorphic to Q.
Definition 4.7.4
The fields Z p and Q are called prime fields.
Activity
1. Consider the subring S={0 , 2 , 4 , 6 } of Z 8. What is the characteristic of S?
2. Does Z 6 have a subring isomorphic to the ring Z3 ? Justify your answer.
Review Exercise
For each of the following problems, show your work clearly.
1. Prove that the intersection of arbitrary family of ideals (subrings) is an ideal (subring)
2. Let (G,+) be an abelian groups.
3. Define “¿” on G by: for x , y ∈G , x∗y =0.
a) Show that (G ,+, .) is ring.
4. Let R be a ring. Then the center of R denoted by Z(R) is defined by,
Z ( R ) ={ x ∈ R| x . r=r . x , ∀ r ∈ R } .
Show that Z(R) is a subring of R.
5. Let R be a ring and S= { x ∈ R| x . y=0 , ∀ y ∈ R } . Then, S is an ideal of R.
6. Show that S=R × R is a field for the two operations defined as follows
( a , b )( c , d )=( a+c ,b +d ) ,
( a , b ) . ( c , d )=(ac+ bd , ad +bc )
7. Let a ∈ R be fixed, where R is a ring.
Then show that C ( a )= { x ∈ R∨ax=xa } is a subring of R.
8. Let a be fixed element of the ring R.
Then show that I ={ x ∈ R∨ax=0 } is an ideal of R.
9. Let R be a commutative ring with unity such that the only ideals are are {0} and R. Prove
that R is a field.
3 ab
10. Consider the ring ( R ,+, . ) . We define, “*” on R by a∗b=
4
Then, show that ( R ,+, . ) and ¿ are isomorphic.
11. Let f : R → S be homomorphism. Then, show that
Ker f is sub ring of R
f (R)is a sub ring of S
12. Let f :¿
g : ( S , ⨂ , ⨁ ) → (G , ⋄ , x ) be ring isomorphisms.
Then , show that ¿ and ( G , ⋄, x ) are isomorphic
13. Let ( R , ∇ , ⨁ ) be a ring with unity 1.
14. Let ∝: ( R , ∇ , ⨁ ) → ¿ be ring isomorphism. Then, prove that
∝(1) is the unity of ¿.
15. If u in R is unit element, then prove that ∝(u) is also a unit element of S.
Summary
Let ( R ,+, . ) be a ring. Then, for all x , y in R.
x .0=0=0. x
x . (− y ) =(−x ) . y=− ( x . y )
(−x ) . (− y )=xy
Let (R ,+, .) be a ring. Then (R ,+, .) is called
Commutative ring if and only if a . b=b . a fro all a , b in the ring
Division ring if and only if every non-zero elements of the ring R are invertible with
respect to “.”.
Let (R,+,.) be a ring. Then x ∈(R ,+ ,.) such that x ≠ 0 is called a zero divisor of the ring
(R ,+, .) if and only if there exists y in (R ,+, .) such that y ≠ 0 and x . y =0
A rign (R ,+, .)is called an integral domain if and only if (R ,+, .) has no zero divisors
Z n is and integral domain if and only if n is prima e
If ring (R,+,.) is an integral domain, then it satisfies all the cancellation laws
m ∈ Z n is a zero divisor if and only if GCF (m , n)≠ 1
Every field is an integral domain
Every finite integral domain is a field
The intersection of subrings (ideals) is also a subring (ideal)
Every ideal is a subring
A field has no proper ideal
Let (R ,+, .) and ¿ be rings and f : ( R ,+ ,. ) → ¿ be an osomorphism, then kernel of f denoted
by ker f is an ideal (subring) of (R ,+, .)
References
Demissu Gemeda and Seid Mohammed ,(2008),fundamental concepts of algebra, Dept. of
Mathematics,AAU
Durabin ,J.R. (2005). Modern Algebra, An introduction, 6 th ed., John Wily&Sons, New
york
Fraleigh,J.B. (2003). A First Course In Abstract Algebra, 7th ,ed. ,Addison Wesley-World
Student Series.
Sing , S. & Zameerudin, Q. (1990). Modern Algebra, 3rd ed.,Vikas Publishing House,New
Delhi.
CHAPTER 5
The System of Integers
Introduction
In the most general sense, number theory deals with the properties of different sets of
numbers. In this chapter, we will discuss some particularly important set of numbers,
called the set of integers. Logical development of the system of integers will be explained
based on few assumptions (axioms). One of the most important proof techniques in
number theory (and in much of mathematics) is mathematical induction. We will discuss
the two forms of mathematical induction, illustrate how they can be used to prove various
results, and explain why mathematical induction is a valid proof technique. Continuing, we
will deals with a fundamental notion in number theory, that of divisibility. We will
establish some of the basic properties of division of integers, including the "division
algorithm". The purpose of the final section of this chapter this chapter is to explain how
integers are represented using base b expansions, and how basic arithmetic operations can
be carried out using these expansions. In particular, we will show that when b is a positive
integer, every positive integer has a unique base b expansion.
Objectives
At the end of this chapter, you will be able to:
Define set of integers.
State the order and the well ordering axioms on the set of integers prove related
theorems.
State the principle of mathematical induction and prove related assertions.
Identify the system of integers as a well ordered integral domain and conversely.
Prove elementary divisibility properties in Z .
Compute GCD (greatest common divisor) and LCM (least common multiple) for
given finite number of non-zero integers.
State Euclidean algorithm and apply to find GCD of a finite number of non-zero
integers.
Define a prime number and express a positive composite integer as product of
positive prime numbers.
The theory of numbers is concerned, at least in its elementary aspects, with properties of
the integers and more particularly with the positive integers 1 , 2, 3 , …(also known as the
natural numbers). The origin of this misnomer harks back to the early Greeks for whom the
word number meant positive integer, and nothing else. The natural numbers have been
known to us for so long that the mathematician Leopold Kronecker once remarked, "God
created the natural numbers, and all the rest is the work of man." Far from being a gift
from Heaven, number theory has had a long and sometimes painful evolution, a story that
is told in the ensuing pages.
We frequently use the integers, and particularly the natural numbers. Though the integers
seem to be familiar objects, we often ask ourselves whether a fact about integers is indeed
so because it is itself an axiom or a consequence of the axioms. When specially confronted
with some of the challenging problems in integers, we frequently ask ourselves about what
the integers actually are, that is the basic axioms governing them and consequences of
these assumptions.
We shall try to construct the integers axiomatically, assuming that any student using this
module is familiar with basic definitions in group and ring theory and at least has an
exposure to some models satisfying the basic notions.
We assume that the system of integers is a non-empty the Z , with two binary operations:
the first called addition and denoted by ‘+ ’ and the second is called multiplication and
denoted by ‘ . ’ satisfying the following four axioms.
¿ is an abelian group.
(Z ,+ ,.) is an integral domain, that is a commutative ring with unity having no zero divisor.
Definition 5.1.1. 0 denotes the additive identity while 1 denotes the multiplicative identity.
Definition 5.1.2. The binary operation subtraction denoted by ‘−’ is define on Z as follow,
x− y =x+ (− y ) , for each x , y ∈ Z .
5.2 Order axiom of the system of integers
This contradicts the assumption that α is the least element of N . Hence α =1 is the least
element of N .
Activity : Explain why the following holds true.
0=−0
0∉N
−1<0
a−1<a , ∀ a ∈ Z .
Example 2. Show that if a ∈ Z , there is no integer between a∧a+1.
Proof: Let a ∈ Z and suppose there exists an integer b between a∧a+1 ,that is a< b< a+1.
Then a+ 1−b=a+1−a+ a−b=( a+ 1−a )−(b−a)∈ N . Hence ( b−a )< ( a+1−a )=1, but
b−a ∈ N . (why ?) Hence 1 is not the smallest positive integer. This is a contradiction.
Thus if a is an integer, then there is no integer between a∧a+1.
Theorem 5.3.1. (Archimedean property) If a and b are any positive integers, then there
exists a positive integer n such that na> b .
Proof: Assume that the statement of the theorem is not true, so that for some a and b ,
na< b for every positive integer n . Then the set S= { b — na: n∈ N }, consists entirely of
positive integers. By the Well Ordering Axiom, S will possess a least element, say, β ,that is
β=b — ma , m∈ N . Notice thatb — (m+1)a ∈ S, because S contains all integers of this
form. Furthermore, we have b — ( m+1)a=(b — ma) — a<b — ma , contrary to the
choice of β=b — ma as the smallest integer in S. This contradiction arose out of our
original assumption that the Archimedean property did not hold; hence, this property is
proven true.
Notation: We define the notation 1+1=2 , 2+1=3 , 3+1=4 , 4 +1=5 , 6+1=7, 7+1=8 and
8+1=9.We shall later see that every integer, and in fact every real number, can be
expressed essentially using the different ten symbols 0 , 1 ,2 , … , 9 known as base ten
numeration.
Theorem 5.3.2. In the set of integers, N={1 ,2 , 3 , … }
Proof: Since 1 ∈ N , as N is closed under addition, we have { 1 ,1+1 , 1+1+1 , … } ⊆ N
Using the above notation, {1 , 2 ,3 , … }⊆ N . It remains to show that N ⊆ { 1 ,2 , 3 , … }
suppose N ⊈ {1 , 2 ,3 , … }. Then S={x ∈ N : x ∉ {1 , 2 ,3 , … } } is a non-empty subset of N . It
follows that by Well Ordering Axiom S has a least element, say θ . As 1 ∉ S, we conclude
that θ>1. As θ−1∈ N and θ−1<θ, we have θ−1∉ S . Hence θ−1∈ { 1 ,2 , 3 , … }. But
then, θ=( θ−1 ) +1 ∈ {1 , 2 ,3 , … }
This is a contradiction as S ∩ { 1 ,2 , 3 , … }= ∅ . Hence N ⊆ { 1 ,2 , 3 , … }. Therefore
, N={1 ,2 , 3 , … }
Corollary 5.3.3: The set of integers Z ,is given by Z={ … ,−3 ,−2 ,−1 , 0 , 1, 2 , 3 ,… } .
Proof: we know that N={1 ,2 , 3 , … }⊆ Z and 0 ∈ Z, since ¿ is a group,
{ … ,−3 ,−2 ,−1 } ∈ Z . ( why ? ) Hence { … ,−3 ,−2 ,−1 , 0 , 1 ,2 , 3 , … } ⊆ Z . Conversely, if x ∈ Z
, by order axiom ,either x ∈ N∨−x ∈ N ∨x=N . Using Theorem 1.1.2, it follows that
x ∈ { … ,−3 ,−2 ,−1 , 0 , 1, 2 , 3 ,… } . Hence { … ,−3 ,−2 ,−1 , 0 , 1 ,2 , 3 , … } ⊆ Z . Therefore,
Z={ … ,−3 ,−2 ,−1 , 0 , 1, 2 , 3 ,… } .
Activity
1. If R is a ring, show that for everyr , s ∈ R
r 0=0 r=0 .
(−r )s=−(rs)
(−r )(−s)=rs
2. If R is a ring with unity and has at least two elements, then 0 ≠ 1.
3. Prove that any ordered integral domain has at least two elements.
4. conclude from 2 and 3 that in any integral domain 0 ≠ 1.
5. Let R be an ordered integral domain and P be the set of positive elements of R .
a) Show that for any x ∈ R ¿ 0 }, x 2 is a positive element.
b) Show that { 1 ,1+1 , 1+1+1 , … } ⊆ P .
6. Conclude from 5(b) that every ordered integral domain is infinite.
5.4. Mathematical Induction
One of the most powerful techniques in proving assertions or solving problems that
involves integers is the Principle of Mathematical Induction (PMI).In this section, we
formulate two equivalent versions mathematical induction. With the Well Ordering Axiom
available, one can derive the First Principle of Mathematical Induction, which provides a
basis for a method of proof called mathematical induction. Loosely speaking, the First
Principle of Mathematical Induction asserts that if a set of positive integers has two
specific properties, then it is the set of all positive integers.
[ ]
k ( 2 k +1 ) +6 ( k+ 1 )
[ ]
2
( k +1 ) 2 k +7 k +6
=(k +1)
6 6
(k + 1) ( 2 k +3 ) ( k +2)
¿
6
Which is precisely the right-hand member of Eq. (1) when n=k +1. Our reasoning shows
that the set S contains the integer k +1 whenever it contains the integer k . By Theorem
1.2.1 (First Principle of mathematical Induction), S must be all the positive integers; that
is, the given formula is true for n ≥ 1.
Although mathematical induction provides a standard technique for attempting to prove a
statement about the positive integers, one disadvantage is that it gives no aid in formulating
such statements. Of course, if we can make an "educated guess" at a property that we
believe might hold in general, then its validity can often be tested by the induction
principle.
Example 5.4.3 Consider, for instance, the list of equalities.
1=1
1+2 = 3
1 + 2 + 22 = 7
1 + 2 + 22 + 23 = 15
1+ 2 + 22 + 23 + 24=31
1+ 2 + 22 + 23 + 24 + 25 = 63
We seek a rule that gives the integers on the right-hand side. After a little reflection, you
might notice that
1 = 2-1 3 = 22- l 7 = 23- l
15 = 24 - 1 31 = 25 -1 63 = 26- l
(How one arrives at this observation is hard to say, but experience helps.) The pattern
emerging from these few cases suggests a formula for obtaining the value of the expression
1 + 2 + 22 + 23 +…+2n-1 ; namely,
1 + 2 + 22 + 23 +…+2n-1 = 2n-1 , for every positive integer n . Eq. (3)
To confirm that our guess is correct, let S be the set of positive integers n for which Eq. (3)
holds. For n=1, Eq. (3) is certainly true, whence 1 belongs to the set S. We assume that
Eq. (3) is true for a fixed integer k , so that for this k
1 + 2 + 22 + 23 +…+2k-1 = 2k-1
and we attempt to prove the validity of the formula for k +1 . Addition of the term 2k to both
sides of the last-written equation leads to
1 + 2 + 22 + 23 +…+ 2k-1 +2k = 2k-1+2k
= 2.2k-1=2k+1-1
But this says that Eq. (3) holds when n=k +1, putting the integer k +1 in S so that k +1 is in
S whenever k is in S. According to the induction principle, S must be the set of all positive
integers.
Remark: When giving induction proofs, we shall usually shorten the argument by
eliminating all reference to the set S, and proceed to show simply that the result in
Activityis true for the integer 1, and if true for the integer k is then also true for k +1 .
We should inject a word of caution at this point, to wit, that one must be careful to
establish both conditions of Theorem 1.2.1 before drawing any conclusions; neither is
sufficient alone. The proof of condition (a) is usually called the basis for the induction, and
the proof of (b) is called the induction step. The assumptions made in carrying out the
induction step are known as the induction hypotheses. The induction situation has been
likened to an infinite row of dominoes all standing on edge and arranged in such a way that
when one falls it knocks down the next in line. If either no domino is pushed over (that is,
there is no basis for the induction) or if the spacing is too large (that is, the induction step
fails), then the complete line will not fall.
The validity of the induction step does not necessarily depend on the truth of the statement
that one is endeavoring to prove.
Example 5.4.4 Let us look at the false formula.
1 + 3 + 5 +…+(2n-1) = n2 + 3 Eq. (4)
Assume that this holds for n=k in other words,
1 + 3 + 5 +…+(2k-1) = k2 + 3
Knowing this, we then obtain
1 + 3 + 5 +…+(2k-1) +(2k+1) = k2 + 3+2k+1
= (k + 1)2 + 3
Which is precisely the form that Eq. (4) should take when n=k +1. Thus, if Eq. (4) holds
for a given integer, then it also holds for the succeeding integer. It is not possible, however,
to find a value of n for which the formula is true.
There is a variant of the induction principle that is often used when Theorem 1.2.1 alone
seems ineffective. As with the first version, this Second Principle of Mathematical
Induction gives two conditions that guarantee a certain set of positive integers actually
consists of all positive integers.
Theorem 5.4.5 (Second Principle of mathematical Induction) Let S be a set of positive
integers with the following properties:
The integer 1 belongs to S.
If k is a positive integer such that 1 , 2, ... , k belong to S, then k +1 must also
be in S.
Then S is the set of all positive integers. That is S=N .
Proof: let T represent the set of positive integers not in S. Assuming that T is nonempty,
we choose n to be the smallest integer in T. Then n>1 , by supposition (a). The minimal
nature of n allows us to conclude that none of the integers 1 , 2, ... , n−1 lies in T, or, if
we prefer a positive assertion, 1 , 2, ... , n — 1 all belong to S. Property (b) then puts
n=( n — 1 ) +1 in S, which is an obvious contradiction. We conclude that the set T is empty
and in consequence that S contains all the positive integers.
Remark : The First Principle of Mathematical Induction is used more often than is the
Second; however, there are occasions when the Second is favored and you should be
familiar with both versions. It sometimes happens that in attempting to show that k +1 is a
member of S, we require proof of the fact that not only k , but all positive integers that
precede k , lie in S. Our formulation of these induction principles has been for the case in
which the induction begins with 1. Each form can be generalized to start with any positive
integer n 0. In this circumstance, the conclusion reads as "Then S is the set of all positive
integers ≥ n0 . "
Mathematical induction is often used as a method of definition as well as a method of
proof. For example, a common way of introducing the symbol n ! (pronounced "n
factorial") is by means of the inductive definition.
(a) 1 !=1 ,
(b) n !=n ∙(n — 1) ! for n>1.
This pair of conditions provides a rule whereby the meaning of n ! is specified for each
positive integer n . Thus, by (a), 1 !=1; (a) and (b) yield
2 !=2∙ 1!=2 ∙1
While by (b), again,
3 !=3∙ 2 !=3∙ 2 ∙1
Continuing in this manner, using condition (b) repeatedly, the numbers 1 ! , 2! , 3 ! , ... ,n ! are
defined in succession up to any chosen n . In fact,
Definition 5.4.6 For each positive integer n , n !=n∙ ( n−1 ) … 3∙ 2 ∙1.
Remark : Induction enters in showing that n !, as a function on the positive integers, exists
and is unique; however, we shall make no attempt to give the argument. It will be
convenient to extend the definition of n ! to the case in which n=0 by stipulating that
0 !=1.
Example 5.4.7 To illustrate a proof that requires the Second Principle of Mathematical
Induction, consider the so-called Lucas sequence:
1 ,3 , 4 , 7 ,11 ,18 , 29 , 47 , 76 , …
Except for the first two terms, each term of this sequence is the sum of the preceding two,
so that the sequence may be defined inductively by
a 1=1
a 2=3
a n=a n−1 + an−2 for all n≥ 3
n
7
We argue that the inequality, a n<( ) holds for every positive integer n .
4
The argument used is interesting because in the inductive step, it is necessary to know the
truth of this inequality for two successive values of n to establish its truth for the following
value. First of all, for n=1∧2, we have
1 2
7 7
a 1=1<( ) =7 /4 and a 2=3<( ) =49/16
4 4
Whence the inequality in Activityholds in these two cases. This provides a basis for the
induction. For the induction step, choose an integer k ≥ 3 and assume that the inequality is
valid for n=1 ,2 , ... , k−1. Then, in particular,
k−1 k−2
7 7
a k−1<( ) =7 /4 and a k−2<( )
4 4
By the way in which the Lucas sequence is formed, it follows that
k −1 k−2
7 7
a k =a k−1+ ak−2 <( ) +( )
4 4
( ) ( 74 +1)
k−2
7
¿
4
¿ ( ) ( )<( ) ( ) =( )
k−2 k−2 2 k
7 11 7 7 7
4 4 4 4 4
Because the inequality is true for n=k whenever it is true for the integers 1 , 2 ,... , k — 1, we
n
7
conclude by the second induction principle that a n<( ) for all n ≥ 1. Among other things,
4
this example suggests that if objects are defined inductively,
then mathematical induction is an important tool for establishing the properties of these
objects.
Remark: We can use the following Extended Principle of mathematical Induction toshow
that a given statement is true for all natural
Extended Principle of mathematical Induction : If conditions (a) and (b) hold that is,
A statement is true for a natural number j
If the statement is true for some natural number k ≥ j , then it is also true for the next
natural number k +1 . then the statement is true for all natural numbers ≥ j .
Activity
1. Establish the formulas below by mathematical induction:
n ( n+1 )
1+2+3+…+ n= for all n ≥1.
2
2
1+3+5+ …+(2 n−1)=n for all n ≥1.
n ( n+1 ) (n+2)
1 ∙2+2 ∙ 3+3 ∙ 4+…+ n(n+1)= for all n ≥1.
3
n ( 2n−1 ) (2 n+1)
12 +32 +52 +…+(2 n−1)2= for all n ≥ 1.
3
2+ 4+6+ …+2 n=n(n+1)for all n≥ 1.
1 n
= ( 4 −1 ) for all n ≥ 1.
2 n −1
1+4 +4 +…+ 4
3
[ ]
2
3 3 3n ( n+1 ) 3
1 +2 +3 +…+ n = for all n ≥1.
2
1 1 1 1 n
+ + +…+ = for all n ≥ 1.
1∙ 2 2 ∙3 3∙ 4 n(n+ 1) n+1
1 1 1 1 n
+ + +… + = for all n≥ 1.
1∙ 3 3 ∙ 5 5 ∙7 (2 n−1)(2 n+1) 2 n+1
n
n< 2 for every positive integer n .
n
2 <n ! for n ≥ 4.
5
n −n is divisible by 5 for every positive integer n .
2. The ∑ of the cubes of three consecutive integers isdivisible by 9.
a ( r n+1−1 )
If r ≠ 1, show that for any positive integer n , a+ ar +a r 2 +…+ a r n= .
r−1
Use the Second Principle of Mathematical Induction to establish that for all n ≥ 1,
n n−1 n−2 n−3
a −1=( a−1 ) (a +a +a + …+a+ 1)
[ Hint : an+1 −1=( a+ 1 ) ( an−1 ) −a ( a n−1−1 ) ]
5.5. Characterization of the system of integers
Divisibility of integers
We start with a number of fairly elementary results and techniques, mainly about greatest
common divisors. You have probably met some of this material already, though it may not
have been treated as formally as here. There are several good reasons for giving very
precise definitions and proofs, even when there is general agreement about the validity of
the mathematics involved. The first is that 'general agreement' is not the same as
convincing proof: it is not unknown for majority opinion to be seriously mistaken about
some point. A second reason is that, if we know exactly what assumptions are required in
order to deduce certain conclusions, then we may be able to deduce similar conclusions in
other areas where the same assumptions hold true. Our starting-point is the division
algorithm, which is as follows:
The division Algorithm
We have been exposed to relationships between integers for several pages and, as yet, not a
single divisibility property has been derived. It is time to remedy this situation. One
theorem, the Division Algorithm, acts as the foundation stone upon which our whole
development rests. The result is familiar to most of us; roughly, it asserts that an integer a
can be "divided" by a positive integer b in such a way that the remainder is smaller than is
b . The exact statement of this fact is Theorem 1.3.1.
Theorem (Division Algorithm) Given integers a∧b , with b>0 , there exist
It is worth pointing out that property (g) of Theorem 1.3.2.1 extends by induction to sums
of more than two terms. That is, if a∨b k for k =1 ,2 , ... , n , then
a∨(b1 x 1 +b 2 x 2+ …+b n x n )
for all integers x 1 , x 2 ,… . , x n. The few details needed for the proof are so straightforward
that we omit them as exercise.
If a∧b are arbitrary integers, then an integer d is said to be a common divisor of a∧b if
both d∨a∧d∨b . Because 1 is a divisor of every integer, 1 is a common divisor of a∧b;
hence, their set of positive common divisors is nonempty. Now every integer divides zero,
so that if a=b=0 , then every integer serves as a common divisor of a∧b . In this instance,
the set of positive common divisors of a∧b is infinite. However, when at least one of a∨b
is different from zero, there are only a finite number of positive common divisors. Among
these, there is a largest one, called the greatest common divisor of a∧b. We frame this as
Definition 1.3.2.2
Definition Let a∧b be given integers, with at least one of them different from zero. The
greatest common divisor of a∧b , denoted by gcd (a , b), is the positive integer d satisfying
the following:
d∨a∧d∨b .
If c∨a∧c∨b , thenc ≤ d .
Example The positive divisors of —12 are 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 12, whereas those of 30 are 1, 2,
3, 5, 6, 10, 15, 30; hence, the positive common divisors of — 12 and 30 are 1, 2, 3, 6.
Because 6 is the largest of these integers, it follows that gcd (— 12, 30)=6 . In the same
way, we can show that gcd (−5 , 5 ) =5 , gcd ( 8 ,17 )=1 , gcd (−8 ,−36)=4
The next theorem indicates that gcd (a , b) can be represented as a linear combination of
a∧b. (By a linear combination of a∧b, we mean an expression of the form ax +by , where
x∧ y are integers.) This is illustrated by, say,
¿ {3 , 9 , 6 , ...}
We observe that 3 is the smallest integer in S , whence 3=gc d (6 , 15).
The nature of the members of S appearing in this illustration suggests another result, which
we give in the next corollary.
Corollary : If a∧b are given integers, not both zero, then the set
T ={ax+ by∨x , y are integers }
is precisely the set of all multiples of d=gcd (a , b).
Proof : Because d∨a∧d∨b , we know that d∨(ax +by )for all integers x , y . Thus,
every member of T is a multiple of d . Conversely, d may be written as d=a x 0+ b y 0
for suitable integers x 0∧ y 0 , so that any multiple nd of d is of the form
nd=n ( a x 0+ b y 0 )=a ( n x 0 )+ b ( n y 0 )
Hence, nd is a linear combination of a∧b , and, by definition, lies in T .
It may happen that 1∧— 1 are the only common divisors of a given pair of integers a∧b ,
whence gcd (a , b)=1. For example:
gcd (2 ,5)=gcd (−9 ,16)=gcd (−27 ,−35)=1
This situation occurs often enough to prompt a definition.
Definition Two integers a∧b , not both of which are zero, are said to be relatively prime
whenever gcd (a , b)=1.
The following theorem characterizes relatively prime integers in terms of linear
combinations.
Theorem Let a∧b be integers, not both zero. Then a∧b are relatively prime if and only
if there exist integers x∧ y such that 1=ax+ by .
Proof : If a∧b are relatively prime so that gcd (a , b)=1 , then Theorem 1.3.2.2
guarantees the existence of integers x∧ y satisfying 1=ax+ by .
As for the converse, suppose that 1=ax+ by for some choice of x∧ y , and that
d=gcd (a , b). Because d∨a and d∨b, Theorem 1.3.2.1 yields d∨(a x +by ), or d∨1.
Inasmuch as d is a positive integer, this last divisibility condition forces d to equal 1 ( part
(b) of Theorem 1.3.2.1 plays a role here), and the desired conclusion follows.
This result leads to an observation that is useful in certain situations; namely,
Corollary : If gcd (a , b)=d , then gcd (a /d , b /d)=1.
Proof: Before starting with the proof proper, we should observe that although a /d∧¿
b /d have the appearance of fractions, in fact, they are integers because d is a divisor both
of a∧of b . Now, knowing that gcd (a , b)=d , It is possible to find integers x∧ y such that
d=ax+ by . Upon dividing each side of this equation by d , we obtain the expression,
1= ( ad ) x+( bd ) y , Because a /d and b /d are integers. The conclusion is that a /d∧b /d are
relatively prime.
For an illustration of the last corollary, let us observe that gcd (— 12, 30)=6 and
gcd (−12/6 , 30/6)=gcd (−2 , 5)=1 as it should be.
It is not true, without adding an extra condition, that a∨c∧b∨c together give ab∨c . For
instance, 6∨24∧8∨24 , but 6 ∙ 8 ∤24. If 6 and 8 were relatively prime, of course, this
situation would not arise. This brings us to the next Corollary.
Corollary : If a∨c∧b∨c , with gcd (a , b)=1 , then ab∨c .
Proof: Inasmuch as a∨c∧b∨c , integers r ∧s can be found such that
c=ar=bs .Now the relation gcd (a , b)=1 allows us to write 1=ax+ by for some choice of
integers x∧ y . Multiplying the last equation by c, it appears that
c=c ∙ 1=c (ax+by )=acx+ bcy
If the appropriate substitutions are now made on the right-hand side, then
c=a(bs ) x +b( ar ) y=ab( sx +ry )
or, as a divisibility statement, ab∨c .
Our next result seems mild enough, but is of fundamental importance.
Theorem (Euclid's lemma) If a∨bc , with gcd (a , b)=1 , then a∨c .
Proof: writing 1=a x+by , where x∧ y are
integers. Multiplication of this equation by c produces
c=1 ∙ c=(ax +by)c=acx+ bcy
Because a∨ac∧a∨bc , it follows that a∨(acx +bcy ), which can be recast as a∨c .
Remark: If a∧bare not relatively prime, then the conclusion of Euclid's lemma may fail
to hold. Here is a specific example: 12∨9∙ 8 , but 12 ∤9∧12∤ 8.
The subsequent theorem often serves as a definition of gcd (a , b). The advantage of using
it as a definition is that order relationship is not involved. Thus, it may be used in algebraic
systems having no order relation.
This division process continues until some zero remainder appears, say, at the (n+1)th
stage where r n−1is divided by r n (a zero remainder occurs sooner or later because the
decreasing sequence b> r 1> r 2 >… ≥ 0 cannot contain more than b integers).
The result is the following system of equations:
a=q 1 b+ r 1 0 ≤ r 1 <b
b=q 2 r 1 +r 2 0 ≤ r 2< r 1
r 1=q3 r 2 +r 3 0≤ r 3 <r 2
⋮
r n−2=qn r n−1 +r n 0 ≤r n< r n−1
r n−1=qn +1 r n +0
We argue thatr n , the last nonzero remainder that appears in this manner, is equal to
gcd (a , b). Our proof is based on the lemma below.
Lemma : If a=qb+ r , then gcd (a , b)=gcd (b ,r ).
Proof: If d=gcd (a , b), then the relations d∨a∧d∨b together imply that d∨(a — qb), or
d∨r . Thus, d is a common divisor of both b∧r . On the other hand, if c is an arbitrary
common divisor of b∧r , then c∨(qb+ r) , whence c∨a . This makes c a common divisor
of a∧b , so that c ≤ d . It now follows from the definition of gcd (b , r ) that d=gcd (b , r).
Using the result of this lemma, we simply work down the displayed system of equations,
obtaining gcd ( a , b )=gcd ( b , r 1 )=…=gcd (r n−1 , r n)=gcd (r n ,0)=r n
as claimed.
gcd (a , b) can be expressed in the form ax +by , but the proof of the theorem gives no hint
as to how to determine the integers x∧ y . For this, we fall back on the Euclidean
Algorithm. Starting with the next-to-last equation arising from the algorithm, we write
r n =r n−2−q n r n−1
Now solve the preceding equation in the algorithm for r n−1 and substitute to obtain
r n =r n−2−q n (r n−3−qn−1 r n−2)
¿ ( 1+q n qn−1 ) r n−2 +(−qn )r n−3
This represents r n as a linear combination of r n−2and r n−3 .continuing backward through the
system of equations, we successively eliminate the remainders r n−1 , r n−2 , … . , r 2 , r 1 until a
stage is reached where r n =gcd ( a , b) is expressed as a linear combination of a∧b .
Example Let us see how the Euclidean Algorithm works in a concrete case by calculating,
say, gcd (12378 , 3054). The appropriate applications of the Division Algorithm produce
the equations
12378=4 ∙ 3054+162
3054=18 ∙162+138
162=1 ∙ 138+24
138=5∙ 24+ 18
24=1 ∙18+6
18=3∙ 6+ 0
Our previous discussion tells us that the last nonzero remainder appearing in these
equations, namely, the integer 6, is the greatest common divisor of 12378 and 3054:
6=gcd (12378 ,3054 )
To represent 6 as a linear combination of the integers 12378 and 3054, we start with the
next-to-last of the displayed equations and successively eliminate the remainders 18, 24,
138, and 162:
6=24−18
¿ 24 – (138−5 ∙24)
¿ 6 ∙ 24−138
¿ 6(162−138)−138
¿ 6 ∙ 162−7 ∙ 138
¿ 6 ∙ 162 – 7(3054−18 ∙ 162)
¿ 132 ∙162−7 ∙ 3054
¿ 132(12378−4 ∙ 3054)−7 ∙ 3054
¿ 132 ∙12378+ (−535 ) 3054
Thus, we have
6=gcd (12378 ,3054 )=12378 x+3054 y , where x=132∧ y=— 535.
Note that this is not the only way to express the integer 6 as a linear combination of 12378
and 3054; among other possibilities, we could add and subtract 3054 ∙ 12378 to get
6=( 132+3054 ) 12378+ (−535 – 12378 ) 3054
¿ 3186 ∙ 12378+ (−12913 ) 3054
The French mathematician Gabriel Lame (1795-1870) proved that the number of steps
required in the Euclidean Algorithm is at most five times the number of digits in the
smaller integer. In Example 1.3.3.1 , the smaller integer (namely, 3054) has four digits, so
that the total number of divisions cannot be greater than 20; in actuality only six divisions
were needed.
Another observation of interest is that for each n> 0, it is possible to find integers a n∧b n
such that exactly n divisions are required to compute gcd ( an , bn )by the Euclidean
Algorithm.
One more remark is necessary. The number of steps in the Euclidean Algorithm usually
rk
can be reduced by selecting remainders r k +1 such that |r k+1|< , that is, by working with
2
least absolute remainders in the divisions. Thus, repeating Example 1.3.3.1, it is more
efficient to write
12378=4 ∙ 3054+162
3054=19 ∙162−24
162=7 ∙ 24−6
24=(−4)(−6)+ 0
As evidenced by this set of equations, this scheme is apt to produce the negative of the
value of the greatest common divisor of two integers (the last nonzero remainder being
−6 ), rather than the greatest common divisor itself.
An important consequence of the Euclidean Algorithm is the following theorem.
Theorem If k > 0, then gcd (ka , kb)=k gcd (a , b).
Proof: If each of the equations appearing in the Euclidean Algorithm for a∧b (see page
23) is multiplied by k , we obtain
ka=q 1 (bk )+ r 1 k 0≤ r 1 k <bk
bk =q2 (r ¿¿ 1 k)+r 2 k 0 ≤ r 2 k <r 1 k ¿
r 1 k=q3 (r ¿ ¿ 2k )+r 3 k 0 ≤ r 3 k <r 2 k ¿
⋮
r n−2 k=qn (r ¿¿ n−1 k )+r n k 0 ≤ r n k <r n−1 k ¿
r n−1 k=qn +1 (r ¿¿ n k )+0 ¿
But this is clearly the Euclidean Algorithm applied to the integers ak ∧bk , so that their
greatest common divisor is the last nonzero remainder r n k that is,
gcd ( ka , kb ) =r n k=k gcd ( a , b )
as stated in the theorem.
Corollary : For any integer k ≠ 0 , gcd ( ka , kb)=|k| gcd (a , b).
Proof : It suffices to consider the case in which k < 0. Then — k=|k|> 0and, by
Theorem 1.3.3.1
gcd (ak , bk )=gcd (— ak , — bk )
¿ gcd (a|k|, b|k|)
¿∨k ∨gcd (a , b)
An alternate proof of Theorem 1.3.3.1 runs very quickly as follows: gcd (ak , bk ) is the
smallest positive integer of the form (ak ) x+(bk ) y , which, in turn, is equal to k times the
smallest positive integer of the form ax +by ; the latter value is equal to k gcd (a , b).
By way of illustrating Theorem 1.3.3.1, we see that
gcd (12 , 30)=3 gcd (4 ,10)=3 ∙ 2 gcd (2, 5)=6 ∙ 1=6
Before moving on to other matters, let us observe that the notion of greatest common
divisor can be extended to more than two integers in an obvious way. In the case of three
integers, a , b , c , not all zero, gcd (a , b , c ) is defined to be the positive integer d having the
following properties:
d is a divisor of each of a , b , c .
If e divides the integers a , b , c , then e ≤ d .
We cite two examples:
gcd (39 , 42 , 54)=3∧gcd (49 , 210 , 350)=7
Remark : It is possible for three integers to be relatively prime as a triple (in other words,
gcd (a , b , c )=1), yet not relatively prime in pairs; this is brought out by the integers
6 , 10 ,∧15. that is
gcd ( 6 ,10 , 15 )=1 but gcd ( 6 , 10 )=2 , gcd ( 6 , 15 ) =3∧gcd ( 10 ,15 )=5
The Least Common Multiple
There is a concept parallel to that of the greatest common divisor of two integers, known as
their least common multiple; but we shall not have much occasion to make use of it. An
integer c is said to be a common multiple of two nonzero integers a∧b whenever a∨c and
b∨c . Evidently, zero is a common multiple of a∧b . To see there exist common multiples
that are not trivial, just note that the products ab∧— (ab) are both common multiples of
a∧b, and one of these is positive. By the Well-Ordering Axiom, the set of positive
common multiples of a∧b must contain a smallest integer; we call it the least common
multiple of a∧b. For the record, here is the official definition.
Definition The least common multiple of two nonzero integers a∧b, denoted
by lcm(a , b), is the positive integer m satisfying the following:
a∨m∧b∨m .
If a|c∧b|c , with c>0 ,then m≤ c .
As an example, the positive common multiples of the integers —12 and 30 are 60, 120,
180,...; hence, lcm(−12 , 30)=60.
The following remark is clear from our discussion: Given nonzero integers a∧b, lcm(a , b)
always exists and lcm(a , b)≤∨ab∨.
We lack a relationship between the ideas of greatest common divisor and least common
multiple. This gap is filled by Theorem 1.3.4.1
Theorem For positive integers ¿ b , gcd ( a , b ) lcm ( a , b )=ab
Proof : To begin, put d=gcd (a , b) and write a=dr , b=ds for integers r ∧s . If
m=ab/d , then m=as=rb, the effect of which is to make m a (positive) common multiple
of a∧b .
Now let c be any positive integer that is a common multiple of a∧b ; say,
for definiteness, c=au=bv. As we know, there exist integers x∧ y satisfying d=ax+ by . In
consequence,
c cd c(ax+ by) c
= =
m ab ab
=
b
x+
c
a () ()
y =vx +uy
This equation states that m∨c, allowing us to conclude that m ≤c . Thus, in accordance
with Definition 1.3.4.1, m=lcm (a , b); that is,
ab ab
lcm ( a , b )= =
d gcd (a , b)
which is what we started out to prove.
Theorem 1.3.4.1 has a corollary that is worth a separate statement.
Corollary : For any choice of positive integers a∧b , lcm(a , b)=ab if and only if
gcd (a , b)=1.
Perhaps the chief virtue of Theorem 1.3.4.1 is that it makes the calculation of the least
common multiple of two integers dependent on the value of their greatest common divisor
—which, in turn, can be calculated from the Euclidean Algorithm. When considering the
positive integers 3054 and 12378, for instance, we found that
gcd (3054 , 12378)=6 ; whence,
3054 ∙ 12378
lcm ( 3054 , 12378 )= =6300402
6
The Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic
Essential to everything discussed herein—in fact, essential to every aspect of number
theory—is the notion of a prime number. We have previously observed that any integer
a> 1 is divisible by ± 1∧± a; if these exhaust the divisors of a , then it is said to be a prime
number. In Definition 1.3.5.1 we state this somewhat differently.
Definition 1.3.5.1 An integer p>1 is called a prime number, or simply a prime, if its only
positive divisors are 1∧ p . An integer greater than 1 that is not a prime is termed
composite.
Among the first ten positive integers, 2, 3, 5, 7 are primes and 4, 6, 8, 9, 10 are composite
numbers. Note that the integer 2 is the only even prime, and according to our definition the
integer 1 plays a special role, being neither prime nor composite.
In the rest of this book, the letters p∧q will be reserved, so far as is possible, for primes.
Proposition 14 of Book IX of Euclid's Elements embodies the result that later became
known as the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic, namely, that every integer greater than
1 can, except for the order of the factors, be represented as a product of primes in one and
only one way. To quote the proposition itself: "If a number be the least that is measured by
prime numbers, it will not be measured by any other prime except those originally
measuring it." Because every number a> 1 is either a prime or, by the Fundamental
Theorem, can be broken down into unique prime factors and no further, the primes serve as
the building blocks from which all other integers can be made. Accordingly, the prime
numbers have intrigued mathematicians through the ages, and although a number of
remarkable theorems relating to their distribution in the sequence of positive integers have
been proved, even more remarkable is what remains unproved. The open questions can be
counted among the outstanding unsolved problems in all of mathematics.
To begin on a simpler note, we observe that the prime 3 divides the integer 36, where 36
may be written as any one of the products
6 ∙ 6=9∙ 4=12 ∙ 3=18 ∙ 2
In each instance, 3 divides at least one of the factors involved in the product. This is
typical of the general situation, the precise result being Theorem 1.3.5.1 .
Theorem If pis a prime and p∨ab, then p∨a∨ p∨b .
Proof : If p∨a , then we need go no further, so let us assume that p ∤a . Because the only
positive divisors of p are 1∧ p itself, this implies that gcd ( p , a)=1.
(¿ general , gcd ( p , a)=p∨gcd ( p , a)=1 according as p∨a∨ p ∤a .)
Hence, citing Euclid's lemma, we get p∨b.
This theorem easily extends to products of more than two terms.
Corollary : If pis a prime and p∨a1 a2 … an, then p∨ak for some k , where 1 ≤ k ≤ n .
Proof: We proceed by induction on n , the number of factors. When n=1, the stated
conclusion obviously holds; whereas when n=2, the result is the content of Theorem
1.3.5.1 Suppose, as the induction hypothesis, that n> 2 and that whenever pdivides a
product of less than n factors, it divides at least one of the factors. Now let p∨a1 a2 … an.
From Theorem 1.3.5.1, either p∨an or p∨a1 a2 … an−1 . If p∨an, then we are through. As
regards the case where p∨a1 a2 … an−1, the induction hypothesis ensures that p∨ak for
some choice k , where 1 ≤ k ≤ n−1.. In any event, pdivides one of the integers a 1 , a2 , … , an
Corollary : If p , q1 , q2 , ..., q n are all primes and p∨q1 q2 … q n, then p=qk for some k ,
where 1 ≤ k ≤ n .
Proof: By virtue of Corollary 1, we know that p∨ak for some k , with 1 ≤ k ≤ n .. Being
a prime, q k is not divisible by any positive integer other than 1 or q k itself. Because p>1,
we are forced to conclude that p=qk .
With this preparation out of the way, we arrive at one of the cornerstones of our
development, the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic. As indicated earlier, this theorem
asserts that every integer greater than 1 can be factored into primes in essentially one way;
the linguistic ambiguity essentially means that 2 ∙3 ∙ 2is not considered as being a different
factorization of 12 from 2 ∙2 ∙ 3. We state this precisely in Theorem 1.3.5.2
Theorem (Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic) Every positive integer n>1 can be
expressed as a product of primes; this representation is unique, apart from the order in
which the factors occur.
Proof: Either nis a prime or it is composite; in the former case, there is nothing more to
prove. If nis composite, then there exists an integer d satisfying d∨n and 1<d <n . Among
all such integers d , choose p1 to be the smallest (this is possible by the Well-Ordering
Axiom). Then p1must be a prime number. Otherwise it too would have a divisor q with
1<q < p, but then q∨ p1 and p1∨n imply that q∨n , which contradicts the choice of p1 as
the smallest positive divisor, not equal to 1, of n.
We therefore may write n=p 1 n 1, where p1is prime and 1<n1 < n. If n1 happens to be a
prime, then we have our representation. In the contrary case, the argument is repeated to
produce a second prime number p2such that n1= p 2 n2 , that is,
n=p 1 p2 n2 1< n2 <n1
If n2 is a prime, then it is not necessary to go further. Otherwise, write
n2 =p 3 n 3, with p3a prime:
n=p 1 p2 p 3 n3 1<n 3< n2
The decreasing sequence
n> n1> n2 >…>1
cannot continue indefinitely, so that after a finite number of steps n k−1 is a prime, call it, pk .
This leads to the prime factorization
n=p 1 p2 … pk
To establish the second part of the proof—the uniqueness of the prime factorization—let
us suppose that the integer n can be represented as a product of primes in two ways; say,
n=p 1 p2 … pr=q1 q2 … q s r ≤ s
where the pi and q j are all primes, written in increasing magnitude so that
p1 ≤ p2 ≤ …≤ pr q 1 ≤ q 2 ≤ … ≤ qs
Because p1∨q 1 q2 … q s , Corollary 2 of Theorem 1.3.5.1 p1=q k for some k but then
p1 ≥q 1. Similar reasoning gives q 1 ≥ p1, whence p1=q 1 We may cancel this common factor
and obtain
p2 p 3 … pr =q 2 q 3 … qs
Now repeat the process to get p2=q2 and, in turn,
p3 p 4 … p r=q3 q 4 … q s
Continue in this fashion. If the inequality r < s were to hold, we would eventually arrive at
1=qr +1 qr +2 … qs
which is absurd, because each q j >1. Hence, r =s and
p1=q 1 p2 =q2 , … , p r=qs
making the two factorizations of n identical. The proof is now complete.
Of course, several of the primes that appear in the factorization of a given positive integer
may be repeated, as is the case with 360=2∙ 2 ∙2 ∙3 ∙ 3 ∙5 . By collecting like primes and
replacing them by a single factor, we can rephrase Theorem 1.3.5.2 as a corollary.
Corollary : Any positive integer n>1 can be written uniquely in a canonical form
k1 k2 kr
n=p 1 p2 … p r
where, for i=1 , 2 ,... , r , each k iis a positive integer and each pi is a prime, with
p1 ¿ p 2< …< pr .
To illustrate, the canonical form of the integer 360 is 360=23 ∙ 32 ∙ 5. As further
examples we cite
3 2 3 2 2
4725=3 ∙5 ∙ 7∧17460=2 ∙ 3 ∙5 ∙ 7
The Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic could be used to find the greatest common
divisor and the least common multiple of two or more integers.
Let a 1 , a2 , … an be natural numbers. Using the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic,
α 11 α 12 α1k
a 1=p 1 p 2 … pk
α 21 α 22 α2 k
a 2=p 1 p2 … p k
⋮
α n1 α n2 α nk
a n= p1 p2 … pk
with positive primes p1 ¿ p 2< …< pk and non-negative integers α ij, 1 ≤i ≤ n and
1 ≤i ≤ k .For each j=1 ,2 , … , k , put
Activity
1. For each pair of numbers, express m in the form m=bq +r , with integers q∧r , 0 ≤ r <|b| .
a) m=37 ,b=8 c) m=342 , b=−33
b) m=¿ 495 , b=65 d) m=−936 , b=−107
2. Show that the square of every odd integer is of the form 8 k +1.
3. Show that the product of any three consecutive integers is divisible by 6.
4. Show that if a∧b are integers and a b , then a k b k for every positive integer k .
5. Show that if a and b are positive integers and a b , a ≤ b .
6. Prove each of the followings.
a) The sum of two odd integers is even.
b) The product of two integers is odd.
7. If ( a , 12 )=1 , thena=12 q+r withq , r ∈ Z and r =1, 5 , 7∨11.
8. Any two consecutive integers are relatively prime.
10. Show that 2 n2+11 is prime for all integers n with 0 ≤ n ≤10 , but it is composite for n =11.
11. Show that 2 n2+29 is prime for all integers n with 0 ≤ n ≤29 ,but it is composite for n =29.
12. Show that x 2−x +41 is prime for all integers x with 0 ≤ x ≤ 40 ,but it is composite for x =41.
13. Show that if k is an integer, then 3 k +2∧5 k +3 are relatively prime.
14. Show that 8 a+ 3∧5 a+ 2 are relatively prime for all integers a .
15. Show that that every positive integer greater than 6 is the sum of two relatively prime integers
greater than 1.
16. If a natural number n is composite, then show that it has a factor d such that 1<d ≤ √ n .
17. Prove that every natural number greater than 1 has at least one prime factor.
18. Using the prime factorization of the integers, find the GCD and LCM of the given numbers.
m=420 , n=1540 , q=6600
m=840 ,n=1890 , q=5250 ,t=14170
19. Use Euclidean algorithm to find GCD of the following pair of numbers and express the GCD
as a linear combination of the pairs with integer coefficients.
a) 1350 and 4500 c) 2450 and 11844
b) 7700 and 136125 d) 4851 and 33800
( ( a1 , a2 , … , an−1 ) , an )= ( a1 , a2 , … , an )
[ [ a1 , a 2 , … , an −1 ] , an ] =[a1 , a2 , … , an ]
Numbers with different bases
Division Algorithm is one of the most important theorems in elementary number theory. In the
previous section, it was essential in both showing the existence of GCD for integers ¿ b , not all
zero, and to find the GCD. Here we indicate how every integer can be expressed in any base b,
where b is a positive integer greater than 1.
Theorem (Bases Theorem) Given an integer b > 1, any positive integer N can be written uniquely
in terms of powers of b as
m−1 2
N=am bm + am−1 b +…+ a2 b + a1 b+a 0
Where the coefficients a kcan take on the b different values 0 , 1 ,2 , ... ,b−1.
Proof: For the Division Algorithm yields integers q 1and a 0 satisfying
or |d k|<b . The only way of reconciling the conditions b∨d k and |d k|<bis to have d k =0, which is
impossible. From this contradiction, we conclude that the representation of N is unique.
The essential feature in all of this is that the integer N is completely determined by the ordered
array a m ,a m−1 , … a 1 , a 0of coefficients, with the plus signs and the powers of b being superfluous.
Thus, the number
m−1 2
N=am bm + am−1 b +…+ a2 b + a1 b+a 0
may be replaced by the simpler symbol
N=(a m am−1 … a2 a1 a0 )b
(the right-hand side is not to be interpreted as a product, but only as an abbreviation for N ). We
call this the base b place−value notation for N .
If b is ten, then the representation (a m am−1 … a2 a1 a0 )10 is called the decimal representation
of N and is simply written as
N=am am −1 … a 2 a1 a 0
Small values of b give rise to lengthy representation of numbers, but have the advantage of
requiring fewer choices for coefficients. The simplest case occurs when the base b=2, and the
resulting system of enumeration is called the binary number system (from the Latin binarius, two).
The fact that when a number is written in the binary system only the integers 0 and 1 can appear as
coefficients means that every positive integer is expressible in exactly one way as a sum of distinct
powers of 2. For example, the integer 105 can be written as
6 5 4 3 2
105=1∙ 2 +1∙ 2 +0 ∙ 2 +1 ∙2 +0 ∙ 2 + 0 ∙2+1
6 5 3
¿ 2 +2 +2 +1
or, in abbreviated form,
105=(101001)2
In the other direction, (1001111)2translates into
6 5 4 3 2
1 ∙2 +0 ∙ 2 +0 ∙2 +1∙ 2 +1 ∙2 +1 ∙2+1=79
The binary system is most convenient for use in modern electronic computing machines, because
binary numbers are represented by strings of zeros and ones; 0 and 1 can be expressed in the
machine by a switch (or a similar electronic device) being either on or off.
If b is ten, then the representation (a m am−1 … a2 a1 a0 )10 is called the decimal representation
of m and is simply written as
N=am am −1 … a 2 a1 a 0
Activity
1. Obtain the representation of each of the following numbers in the scale of b given
a) m=24567 ,b=eight d) m=68392 , b=five
b) m=3896 ,b=two e) m=698392 , b=eleven
c) m=−884325 ,b=six
2. Find the decimal representation of the following numbers.
a) (342532)six c) (103405)eleven
b) (23410)eight d) (103405)seven
Review Exercise
1. Show that for each x , y , z , w ∈ Z the following holds.
x> y ⟺x+z> y+z
x > y y> z ⟹ x> z
x > y z> 0⟹ xz > yz
x > y z< 0⟹ xz < yz
x > y z> w ⟹ x + z > y + w
2. Construct an ordered integral domain where 1is the least positive element.
3. If R is an ordered integral domain and a ∈ R , is it true that there is no element of R
between a and a+1?Why?
4. Show that every non-empty subset of Z that is bounded below has a least element.
5. Prove that non-empty subset of Z that is bounded above has largest element.
6. Prove that the cube of any integer can be written as the difference of two squares.
¿
7. Prove that n !> n2 for every integer n ≥ 4 , whereas n !> n3 for every integer n ≥ 6.
8. Establish Bernoulli inequality: If 1+a> 0 ,then(1+ a)n ≥ 1+ na for all n ≥1 .
1
9. Show that the number of diagonals in a convex polygon of n sides is n(n−3).
2
[ Hint : Biginby showing the result is true when n=4 ]
10. Show that the sum of the interior angles of a convex polygon of n sides equals
(n−2)∙ 180°
11. Show that the formula 2+ 4+6+ …+2 n=n2+ n+2 obeys Condition (b) of the Principle of
Mathematical Induction but is false for any choice of n ∈ N .What do you Conclude ?
12. If the numbers a n are defined by a 1=¿ 11, a =21 ,∧a =3 a
2 n n−1 −2 an−2 for n ≥3 ,¿
n
a n=5 ∙2 +1 n ≥ 1.
θ1 θ2 θk α1 α2 αk
13. Let m= p1 , p 2 , … , p k and n=p 1 , p2 ,… , pk be the prime factorization of m∧n
Summary
The integers are a system ( Z ,+ ,. ) which consists of a set Z equipped with two operations ¿
and (.) that map Z × Z .
Let (R ,+, .) be a commutative ring with identity 1=1 R . This system is said to be an
ordered ring if there exists a subset P=P R ⊆ R with the following properties.
R is a disjoint union R=−P∪ { 0 } ∪ P of the sets P ,−P={−x : x ∈ P } .
P+ P={x+ y : x , y ∈ P}⊆ P (“positive +¿ positive¿positive”)
P . P {x . y : x , y ∈ P}⊆ P (“positive . positive¿ positive”)
(Well Ordering Axiom) Every non-empty subset of P has a least element.
(First Principle of mathematical Induction) Let S be a set of positive integers with the
following properties:
The integer 1 belongs to S.
Whenever the integer k is in S, the next integer k +1 must also be in S.
Then S is the set of all positive integers. That is S=N .
(Second Principle of mathematical Induction) Let S be a set of positive integers with the
following properties:
The integer 1 belongs to S.
If k is a positive integer such that 1 , 2, ... , k belong to S, then k +1 must also be in S. Then
S is the set of all positive integers. That is S=N .
References
Andrew Adler, John E. Coury (1995), The Theory of Numbers: a text and source book of
problems. Jenes and Bertlett publishers, Singapore.
George E. Andrews (1971) NUMBER THEORY. W. B. Saunders Company, London, WC1A
1DB.
Tom M. Apostol(1976), Introduction to Analytic Number Theory. New York ,Heidelberg
Berlin.
ALAN BAKER (1984), A concise introduction to the theory of numbers. Cambridge
University Press, London.
ALAN BAKER (1975), TRANSCENDENTAL NUMBER THEORY. Cambridge University
Press, London.
Yismaw Alemu (1995), Introduction to elementary Theory of Numbers. Department of
mathematics, AAU.