KYAMBOGO UNIVERSITY

FACULTY OF SCIENCE
DEPARTMENT OF CHEMISTRY
INDUSTRIAL ORGANISATION AND MANAGEMENT
COURSE: BACHELOR OF SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY-CHEMISTRY
YEAR OF STUDY: TWO

SEMESTER: TWO

DATE:23/02/2024
GROUP 5. EVOLUTION OF MANAGEMENT
NAME REGISTRATION NO. SIGNATURE
AYEBALE AMULINDA 22/U/CTD/3567/GV
MUMBERE MICHAEL 22/U/CTD/1005/GV
BAINGANA 22/U/CTD/0874/GV
LAWRENCE
AGONGA CAESAR 22/U/CTD/3544/GV
AMADO 23/U/CTD/1761/PD
IMMACULATE MARY
KIHEMBO DEBRAH 23/U/CTD/2038/PD
EVOLUTION OF MANAGEMENT
Evolution of Management.

 The evolution of management refers to the historical development and transformation

of theories, principles, and practices related to the discipline of management. This
evolution encompasses changes in managerial thought, approaches to organizational
structure, and the adoption of new methods and philosophies aimed at improving the
efficiency and effectiveness of managing resources within an evolving socio-economic
and technological context. It involves the progression of management thinking from
classical theories to contemporary models, reflecting adaptations to the challenges and
opportunities presented by the dynamic business environment.

 Management is the process of planning, organizing, coordinating, and controlling

resources (such as people, finances, and materials) to achieve organizational goals
effectively and efficiently. It involves decision-making, leadership, and the
implementation of strategies to guide and oversee the activities of individuals or groups
within an organization, ensuring the optimal use of resources to accomplish desired
outcomes.

The practice of management is as old as human civilization. The ancient civilizations of

Egypt (the great pyramids), Greece (leadership and war tactics of Alexander the great) and Rome
displayed the marvelous results of good management practices.

The origin of management as a discipline was developed in the late 19th century. Over

time, management thinkers have sought ways to organize and classify the voluminous

information about management that has been collected and disseminated. These attempts at
classification have resulted in the identification of management approaches. The approaches of
management are theoretical frameworks for the study of management. Each of the approaches of
management are based on somewhat different assumptions about human beings and the
organizations for which they work.

The different approaches of management are;

a) Classical approach,

b) Behavioral approach,
c) Quantitative approach,

d) Systems approach,

e) Contingency approach.

a) THE CLASSICAL APPROACH:

The classical approach is the oldest formal approach of management thought. Its roots pre-date
the twentieth century. The classical approach of thought generally concerns ways to manage
work and organizations more efficiently. Three areas of study that can be grouped under the
classical approach are scientific management, administrative management, and bureaucratic
management.

(i) Scientific Management.

Frederick Winslow Taylor is known as the father of scientific management. Scientific

management (also called Taylorism or the Taylor system) is a theory of management that
analyzes and synthesizes workflows, with the objective of improving labor productivity. In other
words, Traditional rules of thumb are replaced by precise procedures developed after careful
study of an individual at work.

(ii) Administrative Management.

Administrative management focuses on the management process and principles of

management. In contrast to scientific management, which deals largely with jobs and work at the
individual level of analysis, administrative management provides a more general theory of
management. Henri Fayol is the major contributor to this approach of management thought.

(iii) Bureaucratic Management.

Bureaucratic management focuses on the ideal form of organization. Max Weber was

the major contributor to bureaucratic management. Based on observation, Weber concluded that
many early organizations were inefficiently managed, with decisions based on personal
relationships and loyalty. He proposed that a form of organization, called a bureaucracy,
characterized by division of labor, hierarchy, formalized rules, impersonality, and the selection
and promotion of employees based on ability, would lead to more efficient management. Weber
also contended that managers' authority in an organization should be based not on tradition or
charisma but on the position held by managers in the organizational hierarchy.

b) THE BEHAVIORAL APPROACH:

The behavioral approach of management thought developed, in part, because of

perceived weaknesses in the assumptions of the classical approach. The classical approach
emphasized efficiency, process, and principles. Some felt that this emphasis disregarded
important aspects of organizational life, particularly as it related to human behavior. Thus, the
behavioral approach focused on trying to understand the factors that affect human behavior at
work.

(i) Human Relations.

The Hawthorne Experiments began in 1924 and continued through the early 1930s. A

variety of researchers participated in the studies, including Elton Mayo. One of the major

conclusions of the Hawthorne studies was that workers' attitudes are associated with

productivity. Another was that the workplace is a social system and informal group influence
could exert a powerful effect on individual behavior. A third was that the style of supervision is
an important factor in increasing workers' job satisfaction.

(ii) Behavioral Science.

Behavioral science and the study of organizational behavior emerged in the 1950s and

1960s. The behavioral science approach was a natural progression of the human relations
movement. It focused on applying conceptual and analytical tools to the problem of
understanding and predicting behavior in the workplace.

The behavioral science approach has contributed to the study of management through
its focus on personality, attitudes, values, motivation, group behavior, leadership,
communication, and conflict, among other issues.

c) THE QUANTITATIVE APPROACH:

The quantitative approach focuses on improving decision making via the application of

quantitative techniques. Its roots can be traced back to scientific management.

(i) Management Science (Operations Research)

Management science (also called operations research) uses mathematical and statistical
approaches to solve management problems. It developed during World War II as strategists tried
to apply scientific knowledge and methods to the complex problems of war. Industry began to
apply management science after the war. The advent of the computer made many management
science tools and concepts more practical for industry

(ii) Production And Operations Management.

This approach focuses on the operation and control of the production process that

transforms resources into finished goods and services. It has its roots in scientific management
but became an identifiable area of management study after World War II. It uses many of the
tools of management science.

Operations management emphasizes productivity and quality of both manufacturing and service
organizations. W. Edwards Deming exerted a tremendous influence in shaping modern ideas
about improving productivity and quality. Major areas of study within operations management
include capacity planning, facilities location, facilities layout, materials requirement planning,
scheduling, purchasing and inventory control, quality control, computer integrated
manufacturing, just-in-time inventory systems, and flexible manufacturing systems.

d) SYSTEMS APPROACH:
The simplified block diagram of the systems approach is given below.

The systems approach focuses on understanding the organization as an open system

that transforms inputs into outputs. The systems approach began to have a strong impact on
management thought in the 1960s as a way of thinking about managing techniques that would
allow managers to relate different specialties and parts of the company to one another, as well as
to external environmental factors. The systems approach focuses on the organization as a whole,
its interaction with the environment, and its need to achieve equilibrium

e) CONTINGENCY APPROACH:

The contingency approach focuses on applying management principles and processes

as dictated by the unique characteristics of each situation. It emphasizes that there is no one best
way to manage and that it depends on various situational factors, such as the external
environment, technology, organizational characteristics, characteristics of the manager, and
characteristics of the subordinates. Contingency theorists often implicitly or explicitly criticize
the classical approach for its emphasis on the universality of management principles; however,
most classical writers recognized the need to consider aspects of the situation when applying
management principles.
SUMMARY OF EVOLUTION OF MANAGEMENT.

MANAGEMENT APPROACHS CLASSICAL APPROACH

Beginning Dates Emphasis
Scientific Management
1880s
Traditional rules of thumb are procedures developed after individual at work.
replaced by precise careful study of an
Administrative Management
1940s
Gives idea about the primary management and The 14 Administration
functions of Principles of
Bureaucratic Management
1920s
Replaces traditional leadership with legal
leadership and charismatic leadership
BEHAVIORAL APPROACH Human
Relations 1930s workers' attitudes are
associated with productivity
Behavioral Science
1950s
Gives idea to understand organization.
human behavior in the

QUANTITATIVE Management Science

APPROACH
(Operation research)
1940s Uses mathematical and
statistical approaches to
solve management problems. Production
and Operations Management
1940s This approach focuses on the
operation and
control of the production resources into finished
process that transforms goods and services
RECENT SYSTEMS
DEVELOPEMENTS
APPROACH 1950s
Considers the organization transforms inputs into
as a system that outputs while in constant
interaction with its' CONTINGENCY
environment.
APPROACH 1960s
Applies management dictated by the unique
principles and processes as characteristics of each
situation.

CONTRIBUTION OF FAYOL AND TAYLOR

F.W. Taylor and Henry Fayol are generally regarded as the founders of scientific

management and administrative management and both provided the bases for science and art of
management.

TAYLOR'S SCIENTIFIC MANAGEMENT

Frederick Winslow Taylor well-known as the founder of scientific management was the first to
recognize and emphasis the need for adopting a scientific approach to the task of managing an
enterprise. He tried to diagnose the causes of low efficiency in industry and came to the
conclusion that much of waste and inefficiency is due to the lack of order and system in the
methods of management. He found that the management was usually ignorant of the amount of
work that could be done by a worker in a day as also the best method of doing the job. As a
result, it remained largely at the mercy of the workers who deliberately shirked work. He
therefore, suggested that those responsible for management should adopt a scientific approach in
their work, and make use of "scientific method" for achieving higher efficiency. The scientific
method consists essentially of;

(a) Observation

(b) Measurement

(c) Experimentation and

(d) Inference.

He advocated a thorough planning of the job by the management and emphasized the necessity
of perfect understanding and co-operation between the management and the workers both for the
enlargement of profits and the use of scientific investigation and knowledge in industrial work.
He summed up his approach in these words:

• Science, not rule of thumb

• Harmony, not discord

• Co-operation, not individualism

• Maximum output, in place of restricted output

• The development of each man to his greatest efficiency and prosperity.

Elements of Scientific Management: The techniques which Taylor regarded as its essential
elements or features may be classified as under:

1. Scientific Task and Rate-setting, work improvement, etc.

2. Planning the Task.

3. Vocational Selection and Training

4. Standardization (of working conditions, material equipment etc.)

5. Specialization

6. Mental Revolution.

1. Scientific Task and Rate-Setting (work study): Work study may be defined as the

systematic, objective and critical examination of all the factors governing the operational
efficiency of any specified activity in order to effect improvement.

Work study includes;

(a) Methods Study: The management should try to ensure that the plant is laid out in the best
manner and is equipped with the best tools and machinery. The possibilities of eliminating or
combining certain operations may be studied.

(b) Motion Study: It is a study of the movement, of an operator (or even of a

machine) in performing an operation with the purpose of eliminating useless motions.

(c) Time Study (work measurement): The basic purpose of time study is to determine the
proper time for performing the operation. Such study may be conducted after the motion study.
Both time study and motion study help in determining the best method of doing a job and th e
standard time allowed for it.

(d) Fatigue Study: If, a standard task is set without providing for measures to eliminate fatigue,
it may either be beyond the workers or the workers may over strain themselves to attain it. It is
necessary, therefore, to regulate the working hours and provide for rest pauses at scientifically
determined intervals.

(e) Rate-setting: Taylor recommended the differential piece wage system, under which workers
performing the standard task within prescribed time are paid a much higher rate per unit than
inefficient workers who are not able to come up to the standard set.
2. Planning the Task: Having set the task which an average worker must strive to perform to get
wages at the higher piece-rate, necessary steps have to be taken to plan the production
thoroughly so that there is no bottlenecks and the work goes on systematically.

3. Selection and Training: Scientific Management requires a radical change in the methods and
procedures of selecting workers. It is therefore necessary to entrust the task of selection to a
central personnel department. The procedure of selection will also have to be systematised.
Proper attention has also to be devoted to the training of the workers in the correct methods of
work.

4. Standardization: Standardization may be introduced in respect of the following.

(a) Tools and equipment: By standardization is meant the process of bringing about uniformity.

The management must select and store standard tools and implements which will be nearly the
best or the best of their kind.

(b) Speed: There is usually an optimum speed for every machine. If it is exceeded, it is likely to
result in damage to machinery.

(c) Conditions of Work: To attain standard performance, the maintenance of standard

conditions of ventilation, heating, cooling, humidity, floor space, safety etc., is very essential.

(d) Materials: The efficiency of a worker depends on the quality of materials and the method of
handling materials.

5. Specialization: Scientific management will not be complete without the introduction of

specialization. Under this plan, the two functions of 'planning' and 'doing' are separated in the
organization of the plant. The `functional foremen' are specialists who join their heads to give
thought to the planning of the performance of operations in the workshop. Taylor suggested eight
functional foremen under his scheme of functional foremanship.

(a) The Route Clerk: To lay down the sequence of operations and instruct the workers

concerned about it.

(b) The Instruction Card Clerk: To prepare detailed instructions regarding different aspects of
work.
(c) The Time and Cost Clerk: To send all information relating to their pay to the workers and
to secure proper returns of work from them.

(d) The Shop Disciplinarian: To deal with cases of breach of discipline and absenteeism.

(e) The Gang Boss: To assemble and set up tools and machines and to teach the workers to
make all their personal motions in the quickest and best way.

(f) The Speed Boss: To ensure that machines are run at their best speeds and proper tools are
used by the workers.

(g) The Repair Boss: To ensure that each worker keeps his machine in good order and

maintains cleanliness around him and his machines.

(h) The Inspector: To show to the worker how to do the work.

6. Mental Revolution: At present, industry is divided into two groups – management and

labour. The major problem between these two groups is the division of surplus. The

management wants the maximum possible share of the surplus as profit; the workers want, as
large share in the form of wages. Taylor has in mind the enormous gain that arises from higher
productivity. Such gains can be shared both by the management and workers in the form of
increased profits and increased wages.

HENRY FAYOL'S 14 PRINCIPLES OF MANAGEMENT:

The principles of management are given below:

1. Division of work: Division of work or specialization alone can give maximum productivity
and efficiency. Both technical and managerial activities can be performed in the best manner
only division of labour and specialization.

2. Authority and Responsibility: The right to give order is called authority. The obligation to
accomplish is called responsibility. Authority and Responsibility are the two sides of the
management coin. They exist together. They are complementary and mutually interdependent.
3. Discipline: The objectives, rules and regulations, the policies and procedures must be

honoured by each member of an organization. There must be clear and fair agreement on the
rules and objectives, on the policies and procedures. There must be penalties (punishment) for
non-obedience or indiscipline. No organization can work smoothly without discipline -
preferably voluntary discipline.

4. Unity of Command: In order to avoid any possible confusion and conflict, each member of
an organization must received orders and instructions only from one superior (boss).

5. Unity of Direction: All members of an organization must work together to accomplish

common objectives.

6. Emphasis on Subordination of Personal Interest to General or Common Interest: This is

also called principle of co-operation. Each shall work for all and all for each. General or common
interest must be supreme in any joint enterprise.

7. Remuneration: Fair pay with non-financial rewards can act as the best incentive or motivator
for good performance. Exploitation of employees in any manner must be eliminated. Sound
scheme of remuneration includes adequate financial and nonfinancial incentives.

8. Centralization: There must be a good balance between centralization and decentralization of

authority and power. Extreme centralization and decentralization must be avoided.

9. Scalar Chain: The unity of command brings about a chain or hierarchy of command linking
all members of the organization from the top to the bottom. Scalar denotes steps.

10. Order: Fayol suggested that there is a place for everything. Order or system alone can create
a sound organization and efficient management.

11. Equity: An organization consists of a group of people involved in joint effort. Hence, equity
(i.e., justice) must be there. Without equity, we cannot have sustained and adequate joint
collaboration.

12. Stability of Tenure: A person needs time to adjust himself with the new work and

demonstrate efficiency in due course. Hence, employees and managers must have job security.
Security of income and employment is a pre-requisite of sound organization and management.

13. Esprit of Co-operation: Esprit de corps is the foundation of a sound organization. Union is
strength. But unity demands co-operation. Pride, loyalty and sense of belonging are responsible
for good performance.

14. Initiative: Creative thinking and capacity to take initiative can give us sound managerial
planning and execution of predetermined plans.

REFERENCES

1. Jackson, Eric, “Sun Tzu's 31 Best Pieces Of Leadership Advice”, Forbes, May 23, 2014.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/ryanholiday/2012/05/07/9-lessons-on-leadership-from-
genghis-khan-yes-genghis-khan/;
https://www.forbes.com/sites/ericjackson/2014/05/23/sun-tzus-33-best-pieces-of-
leadership-advice/#124ac8a05e5e
2. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2010/09/20/the-face-of-facebook
3. George, Claude S. (1972). History of Management Thought. Prentice Hall, Englewood
Cliffs New Jersey.
4. Wren, D. A., & Bedeian, A. G. 2009. The evolution of management thought. (6th ed.),
New York: Wiley.
5. Wren, D. A., & Bedeian, A. G. 2009. The evolution of management thought. (6th ed.),
New York: Wiley.
6. Wren, D. A., & Bedeian, A. G. 2009. The evolution of management thought. (6th ed.),
New York: Wiley.
7. Fairbank, J.K. (1991). China: a New History. Harvard University Press. Cambridge.
8. Ruggiero, Guido. The Renaissance in Italy: A Social and Cultural History of the
Rinascimento (Cambridge University Press, 2015).
9. Muldoon, J., & Marin, D. B. (2012). John Florio and the introduction of management into
the English vocabulary. Journal of Management History, 18(2), 129-136.
10. Haynes, M.S. (1991), The Italian Renaissance and Its Influence on Western Civilization,
University Press of America, New York, NY.
11. Bridgen, S. (2001), New Worlds, Lost Worlds: The Rule of the Tudors, 1485 ‐1603,
Viking Penguin, New York, NY.