Individual and Group Behavior Tutorial
Individual and Group Behavior Tutorial
Audience
This tutorial will be useful for students from management streams who aspire to
learn the basics of Individual and Group Behavior. Professionals, especially
project managers, regardless of which sector or industry they belong to, can use
this tutorial to learn how to apply the methods of Individual and Group Behavior
in their respective project environments.
Prerequisites
The readers of this tutorial are expected to have a basic understanding of how a
project manager would deal with a complex project having multiple dimensions
and accomplish it without overshooting his resources.
i
Individual and Group Behavior
Table of Contents
About the Tutorial ......................................................................................... i
Audience ....................................................................................................... i
Prerequisites................................................................................................. i
1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................. 1
Abilities ........................................................................................................ 5
Gender ......................................................................................................... 6
Perception ................................................................................................... 6
Attribution ................................................................................................... 7
Attitude ........................................................................................................ 7
Sensing ................................................................................................. 11
Intuition ................................................................................................ 11
Conscientiousness ..................................................................................... 17
Extraversion .............................................................................................. 17
Agreeableness ........................................................................................... 17
Motivation .................................................................................................. 18
Ability ........................................................................................................ 18
Attitudes .................................................................................................... 20
Theory X .................................................................................................... 22
Theory Y .................................................................................................... 22
iii
Individual and Group Behavior
Application ................................................................................................. 23
Machiavellianism ....................................................................................... 25
Self-Esteem................................................................................................ 26
Self-Monitoring .......................................................................................... 26
Negative Reinforcement............................................................................. 31
Punishment ................................................................................................ 31
Extinction................................................................................................... 32
iv
Individual and Group Behavior
Roles .......................................................................................................... 41
Task Roles .............................................................................................. 41
Group-Building / Maintenance Roles .............................................................. 42
Self-centered Roles ................................................................................. 43
Norms ........................................................................................................ 43
Conformity ................................................................................................. 45
Status ........................................................................................................ 46
Cohesiveness ............................................................................................. 47
Groupthink ................................................................................................. 52
v
Individual and Group Behavior
Groupshift .................................................................................................. 52
vi
1. INTRODUCTION Individual and Group Behavior
Organizational behavior is the study of both group and individual performance and
action within an enterprise. This field of study scans human behavior in the
working atmosphere.
For example: Ram joins a company as an intern and is very open to learning new
things but as time passes and he gets promoted his attitude towards his interns
becomes rude. This is a fine example of individual level of analysis.
1
Individual and Group Behavior
Organizational behavior, at this level of analysis draws upon sociology and political
science. At this level of analysis, organizational behavior includes the study of
organizational culture, structure, cultural diversity, inter-organizational
cooperation and coordination.
To have a clear understanding on the topic and avoid any kind of confusion let’s
look at an example at different levels and try to analyze it.
In this case, we see Rohit and his father have a clash of opinions, hence this is a
case of individual level of analysis.
Extending this example further, if Rohit seeks help from his friends on this matter
his friends will support him as they have the same mindset support the idea of
following their own dreams, struggling and achieving their goal. Meanwhile Rohit’s
father’s friend circle might find the idea of pursuing singing as a career insane and
support his father’s decision of opting for a software.
Here we see two different groups of people with contradicting ideologies, this
becomes a case of group level of analysis.
2
2. INDIVIDUAL BEHAVIOR Individual and Group Behavior
To get a brief idea about the individual behavior let us learn about the individual
behavior framework and other key elements related to it.
B = F(P,E)
Say for example, a well payed person who loses his job in recession may behave
differently when unemployed.
Inherited characteristics
Learned characteristics
Inherited Characteristics
The features individuals acquire from their parents or from our forefathers are
the inherited characteristics. In other words, the gifted features an individual
possesses by birth is considered as inherited characteristics.
Shape of earlobes
Learned Characteristics
Nobody learns everything by birth. First our school is our home, then our society
followed by our educational institutions. The characteristics an individual acquires
by observing, practicing and learning from others and the surroundings is known
as learned characteristics.
4
3. FACTORS INFLUENCING INDIVIDUAL BEHAVIOR Individual and Group Behavior
Abilities
Gender
Race and culture
Attribution
Perception
Attitude
Let’s take a quick look over these major elements that imprints a person’s
behavior inside and outside of the organization.
Abilities
Abilities are the traits a person learns from the environment around as well as the
traits a person is gifted with by birth. These traits are broadly classified as:
Intellectual abilities
Physical abilities
Self-awareness abilities
5
Individual and Group Behavior
Gender
Research proves that men and women both stand equal in terms of job
performance and mental abilities; however, society still emphasizes differences
between the two genders. Absenteeism is one area in an organization where
differences are found as women are considered to be the primary caregiver for
children. A factor that might influence work allocation and evaluation in an
organization is the manager’s perception and personal values.
Race & culture have always exerted an important influence both at the workplace
as well as in the society. The common mistakes such as attributing behavior and
stereotyping according to individual’s race & culture basically influences an
individual’s behavior.
In today’s diverse work culture, the management as well as staff should learn and
accept different cultures, values, and common protocols to create more
comfortable corporate culture.
For example: A company invites candidates for a job post and hires one on the
basis of eligibility criteria and not on the basis of the country a person belongs to
or the customs one follows.
Perception
Perception is an intellectual process of transforming sensory stimuli into
meaningful information. It is the process of interpreting something that we see or
hear in our mind and use it later to judge and give a verdict on a situation, person,
group, etc.
For example: Priya goes to a restaurant and likes their customer service, so she
will perceive that it is a good place to hang out and will recommend it to her
friends, who may or may not like it. However, Priya’s perception about the
restaurant remains good.
Attribution
Attribution is the course of observing behavior followed by determining its cause
based on individual’s personality or situation.
Consensus: The extent to which people in the same situation might react
similarly.
For example: Rohit invites Anisha and two more friends for a movie and they agree
to bunk and watch the movie, this is consensus. Bunking of class says that they
are not interested in their lectures, this is distinctiveness. A little change in the
situation, like if Rohit frequently starts bunking the class then his friends may or
may not support him. The frequency of their support and their rejection decides
consistency.
Attitude
Attitude is the abstract learnt reaction or say response of a person’s entire
cognitive process over a time span.
For example: A person who has worked with different companies might develop
an attitude of indifference towards organizational citizenship.
Now we have a clear idea about what are the factors responsible for the way we
behave. We never think about these elements and how they affect our daily life
but we can’t ignore the fact that they are responsible for the way we walk, talk,
eat, socialize, etc.
7
4. OCCUPATIONAL PERSONALITY TYPES Individual and Group Behavior
The traits we use to find out the careers and college majors we should opt for,
and will fit us the best is known as occupational personality traits. Personality can
be further classified on the basis of an individual’s occupation and vocational
options. John Holland grouped these features into six personality types:
People sharing the same personality type and working together create a work
environment that fits their type. For example, when enterprising persons are
together on a job, they create a work environment that rewards enthusiastic and
innovative thinking and behavior -- an enterprising environment.
People opt for such environments where they can use their skills and abilities, and
freely express their values and attitudes. For example, Realistic types search for
stable work environment; Artistic types look for Artistic environment, and so forth.
People who work in an environment similar to their personality type are more
likely to be successful and satisfied with their job. For example, artistic persons
are more likely to be successful and satisfied if they choose a job that has an
8
Individual and Group Behavior
Understanding the theory and using it efficiently, aligns our core personality traits
to fields that nurture who we are, who we want to be, by offering a rewarding
path towards professional and personal growth.
9
5. MYERS-BRIGGS TYPES OF INDICATOR Individual and Group Behavior
With respect to the prescribed Myers Briggs type of indicator, preferences include
eight leadership styles:
E or I (Extraversion or Introversion)
S or N (Sensing or iNtuition)
T or F (Thinking or Feeling)
J or P (Judgment or Perceiving)
We combine the bias to give our Myers Briggs personality type. Say for example,
our preferences are for E and S and T and J, so it leads to personality type of ESTJ.
In the same way, there are sixteen Myers Briggs personality types that can be
generated by combining these four letters together.
When we put these four letters together, we get our personality type code, and
there are sixteen combinations. For example, INTJ implies that we prefer
Introversion, Intuition, Thinking and Judging (remember, this implies preferences
only - an INTJ also uses Extraversion, Sensing, Feeling and Perception).
Extraversion or Extrovert
If people prefer to direct their energy to cope with others, things, situations, or
"the outer world", then their preference is for Extraversion.
10
Individual and Group Behavior
Introversion or Introvert
If people prefer to direct their energy to deal with ideas, information, explanations,
beliefs, or "the inner world", then their preference is for Introversion.
An introvert is a shy and reticent person. This is denoted by the letter "I".
For example: Archana is a nerdy girl and takes time to mingle up with others and
is considered as an introvert while Alka is a very outgoing person and gels easily
with everyone, so she is considered as an extrovert.
We can collect information in two different ways, using two different information
gathering functions - Sensing and Intuition.
Sensing
If we choose to deal with facts, what we know, to have clarity or to describe what
we see, then our preference is for Sensing.
Intuition
If we choose to deal with ideas, look into the unknown, to generate new
possibilities or to engage what isn't obvious, then our preference is for Intuition.
This is denoted by the letter "N" (the letter I has already been used for
Introversion).
For example: If I say that I believe something good is going to happen then it is
just an intuition as I am basing my statement without any evidence rather on just
a feeling. However, when I say that according to today’s weather forecast it is
going to rain, then this is sensing as I have an evidence to support my statement.
11
Individual and Group Behavior
Thinking
If we choose to decide on the basis of objective logic, using an analytic and
detached path, then our preference is for Thinking. This is denoted by the letter
"T".
Feeling
If we prefer to decide using values or our personal beliefs, on the basis of what
we believe is important or what we or others care about, then our preference is
for Feeling. This is denoted by the letter "F".
For example: If I get Rs. 500 lying on the road and I think as I got it, it’s mine
then it is my thinking. However, if I think it’s not right to keep others money and
decide to donate it then it is considered as a feeling.
Perceiving
If we prefer to go with the flow, to maintain flexibility and respond to things as
they arise in the first place, then our preference is for Perception. This is denoted
by the letter "P".
Judging
If we prefer our life to be planned, stable and organized then our preference is for
Judging (here it is not to be confused with being 'Judgmental', which is quite
different). This is denoted by the letter "J".
For example: Mona gets a job and decides since she has got a job she need not
worry about anything else. This attitude is perceiving. On the other hand, Tina
aims for bank PO exam and plans her life where all her actions will help her achieve
her dream job. This attitude is judging.
ISTJ (Introversion-Sensing-Thinking-Judging)
Individuals with this type of personality are quiet, serious, earn success by honesty
and are dependable. They are logical, matter-of-fact, realistic, and responsible.
They decide practically what should be done and work towards it steadily,
regardless of distractions. They like to keep everything synchronized and
organized - their work, their home, their life. They prioritize traditions and loyalty.
12
Individual and Group Behavior
ISFJ (Introversion-Sensing-Feeling-Judging)
Individuals with this type of personality are quiet, friendly, responsible, and
careful. They are committed and steady in meeting their demands. Thorough,
painstaking, precise and accurate. They are loyal, considerate, notice and
remember specifics about other individuals who are important to them, and are
concerned with how others feel. They strive to create an orderly and harmonious
surrounding at work and at home.
INFJ (Introversion-iNtuition-Feeling-Judging)
Individuals with this type of personality always explore meaning and connection
in ideas, relationships, and material possessions. They want to understand what
encourages people and are insightful about others. Being careful in nature, they
are committed to their firm values. They have a clear vision about how best to
work for the common good. These type of individuals are organized and decisive
in executing their vision.
INTJ (Introversion-iNtuition-Thinking-Judging)
Individuals with this type of personality have a unique mindset and great drive for
executing their ideas and achieving their goals. They quickly see patterns in
external events and develop long-range elaborative perspectives. Being
committed, they start something to do and carry it through. Doubtful and
independent, they have high standards of competence and performance - for
themselves and others.
ISTP (Introversion-Sensing-Thinking-Perceiving)
Individuals with this type of personality are tolerant and flexible, quiet observers
until a problem arises, then act quickly to find workable solutions. The examine
what makes things work and readily get through large amounts of data to isolate
the core of practical issues. They are interested in cause and effect, organize facts
using practical principles, and value efficiency.
ISFP (Introversion-Sensing-Feeling-Perceiving)
Individuals with this type of personality are quiet, friendly, adaptable, sensitive,
and kind. They enjoy the present moment, and are not bothered with what is
going on around them. They like to have their own space and to work within their
chosen time frame. They are loyal and committed to their principles and to people
who are important to them. These individuals dislike disagreements and disputes,
and also do not force their opinions or values on others.
13
Individual and Group Behavior
INFP (Introversion-iNtuition-Feeling-Perceiving)
Individuals with this type of personality are idealistic, loyal, honest to their values
and to people who are important to them. They want an external life that is
compatible with their values. Anxious, quick to see possibilities, they can be
catalysts for implementing ideas. They understand people and help them fulfill
their potential. These individuals are adaptable, flexible, and accepting in nature
until a value is threatened.
INTP (Introversion-iNntuition-Thinking-Perceiving)
Individuals with this type of personality develop logical explanations for everything
that interests them. They are theoretical and abstract in nature, interested more
in ideas than in social communication. They are silent, contained, flexible, and
adaptable. These individuals have unusual ability to focus in depth to solve issues
in their area of interest. They are skeptical, sometimes can be critical, and are
always analytical.
ESTP (Extroversion-Sensing-Thinking-Perceiving)
Individuals with this type of personality are flexible and tolerant; they take a
pragmatic approach determined on getting immediate results. Theories and
conceptual elaborations bore them - they want to act energetically to solve the
problem. They focus on the here-and-now, are active, spontaneous, and enjoy
each moment. These type of individuals enjoy materialistic comfort and style.
They learn only through doing.
ESFP (Extroversion-Sensing-Feeling-Perceiving)
Individuals with this type of personality are outgoing, friendly, free and accepting
in nature. Enthusiastic lovers of life, people, and material comforts. They love
working with others to make things happen. Bring shared sense and a realistic
approach to their work, and make work fun. They are flexible and spontaneous,
adapt readily to new people and surroundings. They learn best by trying new skills
with other people.
ENFP (Extroversion-iNtuition-Feeling-Perceiving)
Individuals with this type of personality are warmly active and imaginative. They
perceive life as full of happenings. Make links between events and information
very quickly, and confidently proceed based on the patterns they see. They want
a lot of confirmation from others, and readily give appreciation and support. These
individuals are spontaneous and flexible, often depend on their ability to improvise
and their verbal fluency.
14
Individual and Group Behavior
ENTP (Extroversion-iNtuition-Thinking-Perceiving)
Individuals with this type of personality are quick, smart, ingenious, stimulating,
alert, and outspoken. Resourceful in solving new and challenging issues. They are
adept at generating conceptual possibilities and then testing them strategically.
They are also good at reading people. Bored by daily routine, these individuals will
seldom do the same thing the same way, and apt to turn to one new interest after
another.
ESTJ (Extroversion-Sensing-Thinking-Judging)
Individuals with this type of personality are practical, realistic, logical, and matter-
of-fact. They are decisive in nature and quickly move to execute decisions. They
organize projects and people to get things done, target on getting results in the
most efficient way possible. They like to maintain routine details, have a clear set
of logical standards, systematically follow them and expect others to do so too.
They are forceful in executing their plans.
ESFJ (Extroversion-Sensing-Feeling-Judging)
ENFJ (Extroversion-iNtuition-Feeling-Judging)
Individuals with this type of personality are warm, empathetic, responsive, active
and responsible. They are highly sensitive to the emotions, needs, and motivations
of others. They find potential in everyone and want to help others act according
to their potential. Often these type of individuals act as catalysts for a person’s or
group’s growth. They are loyal, active to praise and criticism. They are sociable
and provide inspiring leadership.
ENTJ (Extroversion-iNtuition-Thinking-Judging)
Individuals with this type of personality are frank, decisive, smart, and assume
leadership readily. They quickly see illogical and inefficient steps and policies, and
efficiently develop and implement comprehensive systems to solve organizational
problems. They enjoy long-term planning, are usually well informed, updated, well
read, enjoy expanding their knowledge and passing it on to others. They are
forceful in presenting their ideas and views.
These are the 16 different personality types in which an individual can be grouped
into and we can learn about a person.
15
6. BIG-FIVE PERSONALITY MODEL Individual and Group Behavior
The big five personality model identifies five types of personalities and every
individual falls into at least one of these types.
Openness to Experience
Openness flashes the level of intellectual curiosity, creativity and a preference for
novelty and variety within a person. It can also be elaborated as the scope to
which an individual is imaginative or independent, and portrays a personal
preference for a variety of activities over a scheduled routine.
Some debate may occur regarding how to interpret the openness factor, which is
also known as "intellect" rather than openness to experience.
16
Individual and Group Behavior
Conscientiousness
It is the tendency of being standardized, steady, self-disciplined, acting dutifully,
focusing on achieving goals, and prioritizing planned instead of spontaneous
behavior. It contrasts efficient or organized behavior with easy-going or careless
behavior.
Extraversion
Positive energy, positive emotions, confidence, sociability and the tendency to
explore stimulation in the organization with others, and talkativeness is
extraversion. It contradicts outgoing or energetic behavior with solitary or
reserved behavior.
Experiencing positive emotional states and feeling good about oneself and the
world around one is extraversion.
Agreeableness
Agreeableness is the tendency of being compassionate and cooperative instead of
suspicious and antagonistic towards each other. It is a method of measuring one's
trusting and helpful nature, and whether a person has a bad temper or not.
Emotional Stability
It contradicts sensitive or nervous nature with secure or confident one. Being bias
towards experiencing unpleasant emotions easily, like anger, anxiety, depression,
negativity and vulnerability. Neuroticism credits the degree of emotional stability
and impulse control, and is frequently known by its low pole, emotional stability.
The tendency to sense negative emotional states and see oneself and the world
around one negatively.
17
7. MARS MODEL OF INDIVIDUAL BEHAVIOR Individual and Group Behavior
These are marked as the four major factors in determining individual behavior and
results. The model can be implemented to a variety of situations, but is usually
applied in Management, Industrial Psychology or Organizational Behavior studies.
This model represents that these four factors have a mixed effect on individual
performance. If any factor weakens, performance will decrease.
Say for example, passionate salespeople who understand their duties and have
enough resources will not perform their jobs well if they lack sufficient knowledge
and sales skill. Therefore, the Container Store and other enterprises that excel in
customer service pay attention to all four factors in the MARS model.
Motivation
Motivation can be described as internal forces that impact the direction, intensity,
and endurance of a person’s voluntary choice of behavior. It consists of:
Ability
Ability is the natural tendency and learned capabilities needed to complete a task
successfully. It has four different parts namely:
Aptitudes - natural talent that helps people learn more efficiently and
perform effectively.
Person-job fit - there are three ways to match people with jobs
o selecting qualified people
o developing employee abilities through training
o redesigning job to fit person's existing abilities
18
Individual and Group Behavior
For example: Rohan completes a task in 4 days while the time allotted was 6 days.
He has the ability to complete it before the required time frame.
Role Perceptions
They are the beliefs about what behavior is necessary to achieve the desired
results, and have a check that everyone is clear regarding their part. It is of four
types:
For example: Every member in a group is clear regarding the part allotted to them.
For instance, the programmer writes the code and the tester checks it.
Situational Factors
They are the environmental conditions like given time bound, team members,
budget, and work facilities that limits or facilitates behavior. Factors that are
beyond the individual’s control in the short run.
19
8. INTEGRATED INDIVIDUAL BEHAVIOR MODEL Individual and Group Behavior
Attitudes
Attitude invokes an individual's overall promising or unpromising perception
towards a behavior consisting of affective and cognitive dimensions. Attitude is
again of two types:
Experiential attitude
Instrumental attitude
Perceived Norm
Perceived norm directs towards the social pressure one feels to achieve or abstain
from a particular behavior.
Injunctive norm
Descriptive norm
Injunctive norm (like the subjective norm) hints to normative beliefs regarding
what others think one should do and encouragement to comply.
Personal Agency
Personal agency hints to individual's ability to originate and direct actions for given
purposes. It is divided into two parts:
20
Individual and Group Behavior
Self-efficacy
Perceived control
21
9. THEORY X &THEORY Y Individual and Group Behavior
Our management style is firmly influenced by our beliefs and assumptions about
what encourages members of our team, like: If we believe that our team members
dislike work, then we tend towards an authoritarian style of management.
However, if we assume that employees take pride in doing a good job, we tend to
adopt a more participative style.
Theory X
Theory Y
Theory X
This theory believes that employees are naturally unmotivated and dislike
working, and this encourages an authoritarian style of management. According to
this theory, management must firmly intervene to get things done. This style of
management concludes that workers:
Disfavor working.
Demand to be supervised at each and every step, with controls put in place.
McGregor observed that X-type workers are in fact mostly in minority, and yet in
mass organizations, such as large scale production environment, X Theory
management may be needed and can be unavoidable.
Theory Y
This theory explains a participative style of management that is distributive in
nature. It concludes that employees are happy to work, are self-motivated and
creative, and enjoy working with greater responsibility. It estimates that workers:
Take responsibility willingly and are encouraged to fulfill the goals they are
given.
22
Individual and Group Behavior
Assume work as a natural part of life and solve work issues imaginatively.
Motivation
Theory X considers that people dislike work, they want to avoid it and do not take
responsibilities willingly.
In contrast, Theory Y considers that people are self-motivated, and sportingly take
responsibilities.
Work Organization
Theory X employees are specialized and the same work cycle continues.
Application
Theory X management style is widely accepted as inferior to others, however it
has its place in large scale production procedure and unskilled production-line
work.
24
10. PERSONALITY TRAITS Individual and Group Behavior
Extrovert
Neurotic
Open
Agreeable
Conscientious
Locus of Control
Locus of control is the center of control of an individual’s code of conduct. People
can be grouped into two categories i.e. internal and externals respectively.
People who consider themselves as the masters of their own fate are known as
internals, while those who affirm that their lives are controlled by outside forces
are known as externals.
Before making any decision, internals actively search for information, they are
achievement driven, and want to command their environment. So, internals do
well on jobs that craves complex information processing, demands taking initiative
and independent action.
Externals, on the other hand, are more compliant, more willing to follow
instructions, so, they do well in structured, routine jobs.
Machiavellianism
Machiavellianism is being practical, emotionally distant, and believing that ends
justify means. Machiavellians are always wanting to win and are great persuaders.
Here are the significant features of a high-mach individuals:
High-Machs prefer precise interactions rather than beating about the bush.
25
Individual and Group Behavior
Self-Esteem
It is the extent up to which people either like or dislike themselves. Self-esteem
is directly related to the expectations of success and on-the-job satisfaction.
Individuals with high self-esteem think that they have what it takes to succeed.
So, they take more challenges while selecting a job.
Self-Monitoring
Self-monitoring is the capability of regulating one’s behavior according to social
situations.
Individuals with high self-monitoring skills easily adjust their behavior according
to external, situational factors. Their impulsive talents allow them to present public
personae which is completely different from their private personalities.
Risk Taking
Generally, managers are reluctant on taking risks. However, individual risk-taking
inclination affects the bulk of information required by the managers and how long
it takes them to make decisions.
26
11. LEARNING & INDIVIDUAL BEHAVIOR Individual and Group Behavior
Attitude
Perception
Personality
Stress
Belief
Norms or other psychological matters
Emotions: There are happy moments we cherish and the sad moments like
anger, frustration, etc. that we try to forget.
Role of parenting: As we all know that parents are the first tutors of a
child. They teach a child how to walk, talk, eat, etc. A child tries to imitate
27
Individual and Group Behavior
Education: The very second place of learning is the school and college
where an individual chooses to pursue his/her education. It is the place
where an individual’s personality is further polished with respect to the
parenting values.
Manipulation of rewards
The above seen points are the key elements that are responsible for the change
in a person’s behavior.
28
12. LEARNING THEORIES Individual and Group Behavior
Individual and group behavior can be studied by different learning theories. Some
of the remarkable theories are:
Usually, the conditioned stimulus (CS) is an impartial stimulus like the sound of a
tuning fork, the unconditioned stimulus (US) is biologically effective like the taste
of food and the unconditioned response (UR) to the unconditioned stimulus is an
unlearned reflex response like salivation or sweating.
After this coupling process is repeated (for example, some learning may already
occur after a single coupling), an individual shows a conditioned response (CR) to
the conditioned stimulus when the conditioned stimulus is presented alone.
Let’s take an example of a child. A child may learn to open a box to get the candy
inside, or learn to avoid touching a hot stove. In comparison, the classical
conditioning develops a relationship between a stimulus and a behavior. The
example can be further elaborated as the child may learn to salivate at the sight
of candy, or to tremble at the sight of an angry parent.
In the 20th century, the study of animal learning was commanded by the analysis
of these two sorts of learning, and they are still at the core of behavior analysis.
29
Individual and Group Behavior
30
13. METHODS OF SHAPING INDIVIDUAL BEHAVIOR Individual and Group Behavior
Till now we discussed about the causes of behavior and factors affecting them.
But in this chapter, we are going to study how to shape a person’s behavior. We
have five ways of shaping individual behavior with respect to their original
conduct:
Positive reinforcement
Negative reinforcement
Punishment
Extinction
Schedules of reinforcement
Positive Reinforcement
It occurs when a desirable event or stimulus is given as an outcome of a behavior
and the behavior improves. A positive reinforcer is a stimulus event for which
an individual will work in order to achieve it.
Negative Reinforcement
It occurs when an aversive event or when a stimulus is removed or prevented
from happening and the rate of a behavior improves. A negative reinforcer is a
stimulus event for which an individual will work in order to terminate, to escape
from, to postpone its occurrence.
For example: A company has a policy that an employee can have a Saturday off
only if he completes the assigned work by Friday.
Punishment
The creation of some unpleasant conditions to remove an undesirable behavior.
For example: A teenager comes home late and the parents take away the privilege
of using the cell phone.
31
Individual and Group Behavior
Extinction
The process of eradicating any type of reinforcement causing any undesirable
behavior.
For example: A child who crawls under the table to hide and seek attention,
gradually stops doing so when the attention is withdrawn.
Schedules of Reinforcement
The schedules of reinforcement can be of five types: continuous, fixed interval,
variable interval, fixed ratio, and variable ratio.
Continuous
A schedule of reinforcement in which every occurrence of the desired outcome is
followed by the one who reinforces. For example: Each time a child puts Rs. 1 in
a candy machine and presses the buttons he receives a candy bar.
Fixed interval
Conduct of reinforcement with intervals but sufficient enough to make the
expected behavior worth repeating. For example: Working of washing machine.
Variable interval
Conduct of reinforcement with an average of n amount of time. For example:
Checking e-mail or popping quizzes. Going fishing—we might catch a fish after 20
minutes.
Fixed ratio
Oversight of reinforcement when rewards are spaced at uniform time intervals.
For example: Salary.
Variable ratio
Oversight of reinforcement when rewards are spaced at unpredictable time
intervals. For example: Commission in sales.
32
14. GROUP BEHAVIOR Individual and Group Behavior
Types of Groups
There are two types of groups individuals form. They are formal groups and
informal groups. Let us know about these groups.
Formal Groups
These are the type of work groups created by the organization and have
designated work assignments and rooted tasks. The behavior of such groups is
directed toward achieving organizational goals.
33
Individual and Group Behavior
Informal Groups
These groups are formed with friendships and common interests.
For example: A group of workers working on a project and reporting to the same
manager is considered as command group, while a group of friends chilling out
together is considered as an interest group or say members of a club.
34
Individual and Group Behavior
Group Roles
The concept of roles is applicable to all employees within an organization as well
as to their life outside the organization. A role is a set of expected behavior
patterns attributed to the one who occupies the position demanded by the social
unit.
Individuals play multiple roles at the same time. Employees attempt to understand
what kind of behavior is expected from them. An individual when presented by
divergent role expectations experiences role conflict.
Task-oriented Roles
Roles allotted to individuals according to their work and eligibility is known as task-
oriented roles. Task-oriented roles can broadly divide individuals into six
categories initiator, informer, clarifier, summarizer, reality tester and information
seekers or providers respectively.
Relationship-oriented Roles
Roles that group individuals according to their efforts made to maintain healthy
relationship in the group and achieve the goals are known as relationship-oriented
roles. There are five categories of individuals in this category: harmonizer, gate
keeper, consensus tester, encourager, and compromiser.
These roles depict the various roles an individual plays to maintain healthy self as
well as group relationships.
Individual Roles
Roles that classify a person according to the measure of individual effort put in
the project aimed is known as individual roles. Five types of individuals fall into
these roles: aggressor, blocker, dominator, cavalier, and avoidance.
36
Individual and Group Behavior
Well-Functioning Groups
We know what a group is, why it is important to form a group, and what the group-
oriented roles are. Now we need to know how to mark a group as a well-
functioning group, what features are necessary for a group to mark it as an
efficient one.
To work on a specific project, we make a group of four members: Rohit, Raj, Sid,
and Rahul. It is not possible for anyone of them to complete the project
individually, as it may be time-consuming as well as not all the members as
individuals have mastered the skills required to complete the project. This
indicates the need to come together as a group.
Moving ahead, now let us specify their roles. Rohit is the initiator as he proposes
the idea of the project. Raj collects all the information and resources required for
the project and becomes the informer. Sid is the clarifier as he interprets the data
and saves refined information, while Rahul is the summarizer as he concludes the
result of project stating what is to be achieved by the end of the project. These
are the task-oriented roles.
When a group of people come together and present their ideas there is a fair
chance of collision. Rohit tries to resolve all the disagreements and disputes in the
first place and acts as a harmonizer, Sid makes sure that everybody is giving their
full support and effort in the project and acts as a gate keeper, Raj is the one
encouraging everyone and motivating them when they fail to try harder to
complete the project and is the encourager, and Rahul tests the project at each
stage and examines the major decision to be made and is acts as the consensus
tester. These are the relationship-oriented roles of each member.
Individually each of them have different tasks to fulfill. Rohit tries to be the group
leader and impose his ideas on others and we consider him as the dominator,
Rahul is always up with excuses to avoid the task given to him and acts as avoider,
37
Individual and Group Behavior
Raj is the one who opposes everything but is never up with some new idea and
becomes the blocker and Sid takes part in every group activity in a non-productive
way and becomes the cavalier.
38
15. THE FIVE STAGE MODEL OF GROUP Individual and Group Behavior
DEVELOPMENT
A team cannot be expected to perform well right from the time it is formed.
Forming a team is just like maintaining a relationship. It takes time, patience,
requires support, efforts and members often go through recognizable stages as
they change from being a collection of strangers to a united group with common
goals.
Members are discreet with their behavior, which is driven by their desire to be
accepted by all members of the group. Conflict, controversy, misunderstanding
and personal opinions are avoided even though members are starting to form
impressions of each other and gain an understanding of what the group will do
together.
At this stage, group members are learning what to do, how the group is going to
operate, what is expected, and what is acceptable.
This is the stage where the dominating group members emerge, while the less
confrontational members stay in their comfort zone.
39
Individual and Group Behavior
stage. Such questions need to be answered so that the group can move further
on to the next stage.
Group leadership is very important, but the facilitator can step back a little and let
group members take the initiative and move forward together.
At this stage, the morale is high as group members actively acknowledge the
talents, skills and experience that each member brings to the group. A sense of
belongingness is established and the group remains focused on the group's
purpose and goal.
This stage looks at the team from the perspective of the well-being of the team
instead of the perspective of handling a team through the original four stages of
team growth.
40
16. GROUP STRUCTURE Individual and Group Behavior
Group Roles: The different roles a person plays as a part of the group.
Norms: The typical standard set by the group collaboratively that every
member has to follow.
Workplace behavior: The ethics that one needs to follow while working
with an organization.
Social Loafing: The phenomena where group members put less effort
towards achieving a goal than they would have while working alone.
Roles
Roles are a set of expected behavior patterns associated to someone occupying a
given position in a social unit. There are three broad types of roles people play in
small groups:
Task roles
Building and maintenance roles
Self-centered roles
Task Roles
Task roles are roles that focus on completing group’s goal. The different task roles
of a group are stated below:
41
Individual and Group Behavior
42
Individual and Group Behavior
Self-centered Roles
These roles aim to impede or disrupt the group from reaching its goals. The various
self-centered roles in a group are as follows:
Self-confessor: Talks about the topics important to self and not the
group.
Example: “I really like tea. Yesterday I went to CCD. Their coffee is better
than what you get elsewhere . . .”
Norms
Norms are the acceptable standards of behavior within a group that are shared by
the group members. Every group develops its own customs, values, habits and
expectations for how things need to be done.
43
Individual and Group Behavior
Types of Norms
Performance norms
Appearance Norms
Social arrangement norms
Resource allocation norms
Performance Norms
These are centered on how hard a person should work in a given group. They are
informal clues that help a person understand how hard they should work and what
type of output they should give.
For example: Team leader puts various posters in the firm to motivate employees
to work efficiently and give their best performance.
Appearance Norms
For example: There is a formal dress code we need to follow while working in a
organization, we cannot wear a wedding gown to a board meeting.
This norm is basically centered on how we should behave in social settings. Again
here, there are clues we need to pick up on when we are out with friends or at
social events that help us fit in and get a closer connection to the group.
For Example: We cannot take our official work to a friend’s birthday party just for
the sake of completing it.
For Example: If the client needs the project by tomorrow then anyhow it has to
be completed by using available resources or doing over time.
44
Individual and Group Behavior
Conformity
Conformity can be stated as “accommodating to group pressures”. It is also called
as the majority influence or we can say the group pressure.
Normative Conformity
Informational Conformity
Ingratiational Conformity
Normative Conformity
Yielding to group pressure because an individual wants to fit in with the group.
Conforming usually takes place because the individual is scared of being rejected
or neglected by the group.
This type of conformity usually includes compliance like where a person publicly
accepts the views of a group but privately rejects them.
Informational Conformity
This usually happens when a person lacks knowledge and looks to the group for
guidance. Or when a person is not clear about a situation and socially compares
one’s behavior with the group.
This type of conformity includes internalization like where a person accepts the
views of the groups and adopts them as an individual.
Ingratiational Conformity
Where a person conforms to gain a favor or acceptance from other people. It is
relative to normative influence but is encouraged by the need for social rewards
rather than the threat of being rejected.
45
Individual and Group Behavior
Reference Groups
It is a group to which a person or another group is compared. Reference groups
are used in order to examine and determine the nature of a person or other group's
features and sociological attributes.
These groups act as a benchmark and contrast needed for comparison and
evaluation of group and personal characteristics.
Status
Status is a socially defined position or rank given to groups or group members by
others. A group structure status includes group norms, culture, status equity. All
these factors when combined presents the status of members of the group.
Social Loafing
It is the phenomenon of people exerting less effort to achieve a goal when they
work as a group than when they work alone.
This is one of the main reasons why groups are sometimes less productive than
the combined performance of their members working as individuals, but should
be recognized from the accidental coordination problems that groups sometimes
experience.
Many of the causes of social loafing arise from an individual feeling that his or her
effort will not matter to the group.
For Example: Age, sex, religion, region, length of the service in the organization
and the impact of this attribute on turnover.
46
Individual and Group Behavior
Cohesiveness
Extent to which group members are attracted towards each other, and are
encouraged to stay in the group. Group cohesion is the aggregate of all the factors
causing members of a group to stay in the group or be attracted to the group.
Group cohesion acts as the social glue that binds a group together. Some people
think that work teams illustrating strong group cohesion will function and perform
better in achieving work goals.
Group cohesion is not attributed to one single factor, but is the interaction of more
than one factor. While group cohesion may have an impact on group performance,
group performance may create or increase group cohesion. Thus, group cohesion
can actually have a negative impact on group task performance.
The most influential factor that creates a positive relationship between group
cohesion and group performance is the group members' commitment towards the
organization's performance goals and norms.
47
17. DEVIANT WORKPLACE BEHAVIOR Individual and Group Behavior
In organizations of any size, deviant behavior can occur, which can sabotage the
work. There are usually two types of deviant behavior:
Aggressive Behavior
Workplace deviance can sometimes take the form of aggressive behavior. In
diverse work environments, deviance may occur when workers display intolerance
of co-workers of different nationalities or cultures.
Some common examples include: sexual harassment, bullying and showing open
hostility towards co-workers.
Unproductive Behavior
Actions that disrupt or minimize productivity are also a form of workplace
deviance. Common examples of this type of deviant behavior include: Workers
who waste their time by standing around the water cooler, taking the "scenic
route" while making sales calls or extending the time it takes to complete a task
that slows down productivity.
Some other examples include showing up late for work, calling in sick when in
perfect health, sneaking out early or taking long lunch or coffee breaks.
Abuse of Property
It includes using company vehicles for personal errands, damaging company
equipment or defacing work areas, taking home office supplies or failing to return
items borrowed from the company and many more.
Company Politics
This occurs in many workplaces and is considered as a part of workplace deviance.
A worker may spread false rumors or gossip about another in an effort to gain
promotion or more favorable work assignment.
Supervisors who are partial towards one employee over another or prevent
deserving employees from career advancement are also guilty of committing a
deviant act.
48
Individual and Group Behavior
Employees who are actively engaged in gossip sessions can have a negative
impact on employee morale.
49
18. GROUP DECISION-MAKING Individual and Group Behavior
The decision is then no longer attributable to any individual group member as all
the individuals and social group processes like social influence contribute to the
decision outcome.
The decisions made by groups are mostly different from those made by
individuals. For example: groups tend to make decisions that are more extreme
than those made by individual members, as individual’s tend to be biased.
Synergy
It is the idea that the whole is greater than the aggregate of its parts. When a
group makes a decision collectively, its judgment can be powerful than that of any
of its members. Through discussing, questioning, and collaborative approach,
group members can identify more complete and robust solutions and
recommendations.
Sharing of Information
Group decisions take into account a wider scope of information as each group
member may contribute distinct information and expertise. Sharing information
increases understanding, clarifies issues, and facilitates movement towards a
collective decision.
Diffusion of Responsibility
Group decision making results in distribution of responsibility that results in lack
of accountability for outcomes. In this way, everyone is responsible for a decision,
and no one really is.
Moreover, group decisions can make it easier for members to refuse personal
responsibilities and blame others for bad decisions.
50
Individual and Group Behavior
Lower Efficiency
Group decisions can sometimes be less efficient than individual decisions. It takes
additional time because there is a need of active participation, discussion, and
coordination among group members.
Without good facilitation and structure, meetings can get eliminated in trivial
details that may matter a lot to one person but not to the others.
Groupthink
One of the biggest disadvantage of effective group decision making is groupthink.
It is a psychological phenomenon that occurs within a group of people in which
the wish for harmony or conformity results in an illogical or dysfunctional decision-
making outcome.
51
19. GROUPTHINK & GROUPSHIFT Individual and Group Behavior
It sounds a bit confusing now but by the end of this chapter we will get a clear
idea about these two topics.
Groupthink
Sometimes we feel like speaking up in a meeting, classroom, or informal group,
but decide against it. Why?
Group members justify any resistance to the assumptions they have made.
No matter how firmly the evidence contradicts their basic assumptions,
members behave in way so as to reinforce those assumptions continually.
Members apply direct pressure on those who briefly present their doubts
about any of the views shared by the group or the one who question’s the
validity of arguments supporting the substitute favored by the majority.
Groupshift
In balancing group decisions with the individual decisions of members within the
group, evidence hints that there are differences. In some cases, the group
52
Individual and Group Behavior
decisions are more timid than the individual decisions. More often, the shift is
close to greater risk.
So conservative types become more cautious and the more intrusive types take
on more risk. The group discussion tends to fabricate the initial position of the
group.
Group shift is the phenomena in which individual decisions make way for
exaggerated group decisions. Group shift can be seen as a special case of
groupthink.
The decision of the group shows the dominant decision-making norm that is
developed during the group’s discussion. Whether the shift in the group’s decision
is towards greater deliberation or more risk depends on the dominant pre-
discussion norm.
The greater episode of the shift towards risk has generated several explanations
for the phenomenon. It has been argued, for instance, that the discussion creates
familiarization between members. As they become more comfortable with each
other, they also become more bold, confident and daring.
Group decisions free any single individual from accountability for the group’s final
choice. Greater risk can be taken as even if the decision fails, no single individual
can be held wholly responsible.
Brainstorming
Nominal group thinking
Didactic technique
Delphi technique
Brainstorming
This technique includes a group of people, mostly between five and ten in number,
sitting around a table, producing ideas in the form of free association. The main
focus is on generation of ideas and not on evaluation of these ideas.
If more ideas can be originated, then it is likely that there will be a unique and
creative idea among them. All these ideas are written on the blackboard with a
53
Individual and Group Behavior
piece of chalk so that all the team members can see every idea and try to
improvise these ideas.
Members form the group for namesake and operate independently, originate ideas
for solving the problem on their own, in silence and in writing. Members do not
communicate well with each other so that strong personality domination is evaded.
The group coordinator either collects the written ideas or writes them on a large
blackboard so that each member of the group can see what the ideas are.
These ideas are further discussed one by one in turn and each participant is
motivated to comment on these ideas in order to clarify and improve them. After
all these ideas have been discussed, they are evaluated for their merits and
drawbacks and each actively participating member is needed to vote on each idea
and allot it a rank on the basis of priority of each alternative solution.
The idea with the highest cumulative ranking is selected as the final solution to
the problem.
Didactic Interaction
The type of problem should be such that it generates output in the form of yes or
no. Say for example, a decision is to be made whether to buy or not to buy a
product, to merge or not to merge, to expand or not to expand and so on. These
types of decision requires an extensive and exhaustive discussion and
investigation since a wrong decision can have serious consequences.
There are many advantages as well as disadvantages of this type of situation. The
group that makes the decision is divided into two sub-groups, one in favor of the
“go” decision and the opposing in favor of the “no go” decision.
The first group enlists all the “pros” of the problem solution and the second group
lists all the “cons”. These groups meet and discuss their discoveries and their
reasons.
After tiring discussions, the groups switch sides and try to find weaknesses in their
own original standpoints. This interchange of ideas and understanding of various
54
Individual and Group Behavior
viewpoints results in mutual acceptance of the facts as they exist so that a solution
can be put together around these facts and ultimately a final decision is reached.
Delphi Technique
This technique is the improvised version of the nominal group technique, except
that it involves obtaining the opinions of experts physically distant from each other
and unknown to each other.
This isolates group members from the undue influence of others. Basically, the
types of problems sorted by this technique are not specific in nature or related to
a particular situation at a given time.
Say for example, the technique could be used to explain the problems that could
be created in the event of a war. The Delphi technique includes the following steps:
The problem is first identified and a panel of experts are selected. These
experts are asked to provide potential solutions through a series of
thoughtfully designed questionnaires.
The results of the questionnaire are composed at a central location and the
central coordinator prepares a second set of questionnaire based on the
previous answers.
Members are required to review the results and respond to the second
questionnaire. The results typically trigger new solutions or motivate
changes in the original ideas.
55