TheClient:

Structural Design Report of Residential Building

`

Designed By:
QUALITY DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION PVT.LTD.

Client:

Submitted By:
QUALITY DESIGN AND
CONSTRUCTION PVT.LTD.
Table of Contents

1.0 Introduction
2.0 Objective
3.0 Scope of the works
4.0 Location of the Proposed Building
5.0 Building Description
6.0 Structural Systems for the Buildings
6.1 Structural Modeling
6.2 Nepal Building Code, Important Indian and Foreign Standards adopted For Designs.
6.3 Materials
6.4 Cover to Reinforcement
7.0 Load Calculation
7.1 Gravity Load
7.1.1 Dead Loads:
7.1.2 Live Loads:
7.2 Seismic Load
7.2.1 Seismic Coefficient Method
7.2.2 Wind Loads:
7.2.3 Other Loads:
7.3 Load Combinations:
8.0 Design Procedure
9.0 Serviceability Requirements (Control of Deflection)
10.0 Ductile Detailing
11.0 Foundation
11.1 Design of Foundation
12.0 Analyses & Design Output

ANNEX:
ANNEX-1: Architectural Drawing
ANNEX-2: Internal stress details of Seismic Load in the frame of building
ANNEX-3: Reinforcement details in the frame of building

Structural Analysis Report

1.0 Introduction

This report has been prepared as a part of the structural engineering analysis and design of Office
building of Residential Building at Buddhanilkantha, Kathmandu.
This Report describes in brief the Structural Aspects and Design Report of the said building. The
analysis and design have been carried out using finite element software ETABS 19.0.0 version.
The structural design is intended to be based primarily on the current Code of Practice of India
taking into account of relevant British Codes for the provisions not covered in this and is generally
in conformance with NBC of Nepal.
The proposed Building consists of four storey. The Plinth Level of the building is taken as 0.8m from
Ground level and 2.1m from Ground level to the top of footing. The analysis and design has been
performed as an office building. The typical floor height of the building is 2.84 m.

2.0 Objective

The main objective of this structural analysis is to perform analysis and design of the afore-
mentioned building with the seismic resistant features.

3.0 Scope of the works

The scope of the works for STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS and DESIGN is as follows:
 Modeling of the building has been done using ETABS 19.0.0.
 Structural analysis of the modeled building
 Reinforced concrete design of the structural elements / members
 Prepare the report detailing the procedures of structural analysis & design.

Structural Analysis Report

4.0 Location of the Existing Building
Nepal is a country that stands at 11 th position in the world with respect to vulnerability to
earthquake hazards. As per IS 1893:2002 (Part 1), Nepal lies in high seismic risk (Zones IV and V)
as shown in Figure 1. The site is in Buddhanikantha, Kathmandu,Nepal & it belongs to the seismic
risk zone V.

Figure 1 Seismic Hazard of Himalayas

Figure 2 Seismic Hazard of Nepal

Structural Analysis Report

As per Nepal Building Code, the seismic zoning of Nepal is as shown in the following Figure 2. Z
is the seismic zoning factor that divides the country into fives zones for the purpose of seismic
design of buildings with the values ranging from 0.8 to 1.1. Seismic Zone Factor: 0.35 for
Kathmandu as per NBC 105.

Figure 3 Seismic Zoning Factor

5.0 Building Description

There is a single block that needs the structural analysis & reinforced concrete design of the
structural elements

Proposed building
I. Residential Building:

Type of building: Residential Building

Structural system : RCC Space frame, ductile Special Moment Resisting Frame (SMRF)
Plinth Area Covered: 959.56 sqft

1.2.2 Building Features

The building has some special features which are listed below:

Type of Buildings: Special RC Moment Resisting Frame Structure

Shape: Irregular Shape
Plinth level: As per architectural drawing
Roof floor Type: Accessible/Non-accessible Terrace

Structural Analysis Report

 Walls: Brick walls
Footing Type: Strap, Combined and Isolated
Story Height: All floors- 2.84 m
Total Height: 11.69 m from Ground lvl.
No of Story: GF + 2.5 storey
Safe bearing pressure: 120 KN/m2 (Geotechnical Investigation work DUDBC)

TABLE: Frame Sections

Name Material Shape t3 t2
mm mm
Beam 230x300 M20 Concrete Rectangular 230 300
Beam 230x425 M20 Concrete Rectangular 230 425
Col 350x350 M20 Concrete Rectangular 350 350

6.0 Structural Systems for the Buildings

Structural system is to the building what skeleton is to the human body. It comprises both
horizontal and vertical structural elements that acting jointly support and transmit to the ground
those forces arising from earthquake motions, wind, gravity and lateral earth pressure. Its role
becomes increasingly important with the increase in building height. Thus, the vital criteria for
structural systems are an adequate reserve of strength against failure, adequate lateral stiffness, and
an efficient performance during the service life of the building.
The determination of the structural forms of a building involves the selection and arrangement of
the major structural elements to resist most efficiently the various combinations of gravity and
horizontal loadings. The choice of structural form is strongly influenced by the internal planning,
the material and method of construction, the external architectural treatment, the location and
routing of service systems, the nature and magnitude of the horizontal loading, and the height and
proportion of the building. Strength, rigidity and stability are the three main factors to consider in
the design of all structures.
The structural system chosen for the buildings consists of Special Moment Resisting RCC Frames.
Columns and beams have been laid out in plan in coordination with architectural and services
drawings.

Structural Analysis Report

6.1 Structural Modeling

A three-dimensional mathematical model of the physical structure should be used that represents
the spatial distribution of the mass and stiffness of the structure to an extent that is adequate for the
calculation of the significant features of its dynamic response. Further, structural models are
required to obtain member forces and structure displacements resulting from applied loads and any
imposed displacements or P-Delta effects. Thus, the essential requirements for the analytical model
are the inclusion of sufficient details of geometry, material, loading and support such that it reflects
the near-true behavior of the physical structure.
Space frame analysis using ETABS 19.0.0 version software has been undertaken to obtain refined
results for all load combinations in accordance with IS:456-2000. The framing systems (including
the sizes of various structural elements) have been worked out, on the basis of a preliminary
structural analysis and also in co-ordination with relevant architectural & services requirements.
Column and Beams have been modeled as line members. The beam Column Junction is
understood to behave as rigid.

6.2 Nepal Building Code, Important Indian and Foreign Standards Adopted
For Design

The main design standards followed for structural design are given below, indicating their area of
application.

S.NO Code Title

1. NBC:101-1994 Materials Specifications.
2. IS:8112-1989 Specification for 43 Grade Ordinary Portland Cement.
3. IS:12269-1987 Specification for 53 Grade Ordinary Portland Cement.
4. IS:383-1970 Specification for coarse and fine aggregate from natural
sources for concrete.
5. IS:456-2000 Code of Practice for Plain and Reinforced Concrete.
6. NBC:102-1994 Unit Weight of Materials.

Structural Analysis Report

7. NBC:103-1994 Occupancy Load.
8. IS:1786-1985 Specs. For High Strength Deformed steel bars and wires for
concrete reinforcement.
9. IS:1904-1986 Design and Construction of Foundation in soils: General
Requirements.
10. NBC:201:1994 Mandatory Rules of Thumbs - Reinforced Concrete Building
with Masonry Infill.
11. IS: 1905-1987 Code of Practice for Structural Use of Un-reinforced Masonry.
12. NBC:109-1994 Masonry: Unreinforced.
13. NBC:110-1994 Plain and Reinforced Concrete.
14. IS:8009-1976 Calculation of settlement of shallow foundations.
15. BS:8110-1985 Structural Use of Concrete.
16. NBC:105-2020 Seismic Design of Buildings in Nepal.
17. IS:1893-2002 Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of structures.
18. IS:4326-1993 Code of Practice for Earthquake Resistant Design and
Construction of Buildings.
19. IS:13920-1993 Ductile Detailing of Reinforced Concrete Structures subjected
to Seismic Forces.

The structural analysis and design was carried out using relevant Nepal National Building Code,
Indian Codes of Practice and British Codes, where applicable. The earthquake loading was carried
out using IS 1893. The structural design of foundation, column, beam and slab was based on IS 456
2000. Also, the system has been designed to meet the ductility requirements of IS 13920.

6.3 Materials

Grade of Concrete
The Indian Code IS: 456-2000, permits a minimum grade of concrete for reinforced concrete
members as M20 and the following Concrete Grades have been used for various Structural Elements.
a) M20 grade concrete has been used for slabs, beams and foundations. For all other
structural elements M20 Grade shall be used. All concrete shall be conforming to IS: 456-
2000.

Structural Analysis Report

Material properties

The material property information for materials used in the model are as follows:

TABLE: Material Properties - Concrete

Name E ν α G Unit Weight Unit Mass Fc
MPa 1/C MPa kN/m³ kg/m³ MPa
M20 22360.68 0.2 0.0000099 9316.95 25 2549.29 20

Reinforcement
All reinforcement bars to be used in the structural elements shall be High Yield Strength Deformed
Thermo-Mechanically Treated bars with yield stress of 415 and 500 MPa and minimum elongation of
14.5% conforming to IS: 1786-1985.

TABLE: Material Properties - Rebar

Name E Α Unit Weight Unit Mass Fy Fu
MPa 1/C kN/m³ kg/m³ MPa MPa
Fe415 199947.98 0.0000117 76.9729 7849.047 415 485
Fe500 199947.98 0.0000117 76.9729 7849.047 500 545

6.4 Cover to Reinforcement

Minimum values for the nominal cover to be provided to all reinforcement, including links of normal
weight aggregate concrete depend on the condition of exposure and minimum specified period of fire
resistance.
Environmental exposure conditions considered are ‘moderate’ for sub structure, and ‘mild’ for
superstructure. Minimum fire rating considered is four hours for columns, two hours for beams and
one hour for slabs.
Clear cover to the main reinforcement in the various structural elements depends on above criteria
shall be:
a) Footings (Bottom) 50 mm
Footings (Top and Sides) 50 mm
b) Columns / Shear Walls 40 mm
c) Pedestals 40 mm
d) Beams 25 mm or bar diameter

Structural Analysis Report

 which ever is greater
e) Slabs 20 mm
f) Staircase waist slab 20 mm
g) Water tank walls and slabs 30 mm
h) Retaining walls (Earth face) 25 mm
j) Retaining walls (Other face) 20 mm

7.0 Load Calculation

7.1 Gravity Load

Gravity loading is primarily due to the self-weight of the structure, superimposed dead load
and occupancy of the building. Following loads have been considered for the analysis and
design of the building based on the relevant Indian Standards.

a) Dead Loads:

The Dead load on the frame is calculated floor wise and it comprises Beams, Slabs, Stairs,
Foundation, Partition wall, Floor finishes etc.
Following unit weights of building materials have been considered in accordance
With IS: 875 (Part I)-1987 and IS: 1911.
Reinforced cement concrete : 25 KN/m3
Plain cement concrete : 24 KN/m3
Brick masonry : 19.2 KN/m3
AAC Light Weight concrete block : 8.5 KN/m3
Light Weight Filling in Sunken area : 8.0 KN/m3
Cement mortar / plaster : 2.08 KN/m3
Floor finish : 1.5 KN/m2
Light Partition : 1.5 KN/m2

Structural Analysis Report

 b) Live Loads:

Following live loads have been considered in design in accordance with IS: 875 (Part II)-
1987.
Staircases and corridors : 3.00 KN/m2
Roof (Accessible with possible AHU addition) : 1.5 KN/m2
Room : 2.00 KN/m2
Roof (Inaccessible) : 0.75 KN/m2

c) Load Pattern Definitions

TABLE: Load Patterns

Self Weight
Name Type Auto Load
Multiplier

Dead Dead 1
Light
Superimposed Dead 0
Partition(LPW)
EQSLSx Seismic 0 IS1893 2002
EQSLSy Seismic 0 IS1893 2002
EQULSx Seismic 0 IS1893 2002
EQULSy Seismic 0 IS1893 2002
Live Live 0
Wall Superimposed Dead 0

d) Sample of Wall Load Calculation

Thickness of wall = 0.23 m
Density of masonry = 19.2 KN/m3
Effective height = (3.17-0.3) = 2.87 m
Allowance for opening Internal = 50%
Allowance for opening External = 50%
Wall load without openings = 0.23*19.5*2.87 = 12.91KN/m
Wall load with openings (external) = 0.23*19.5*2.87 *0.5 = 6.45 KN/m
Wall load with openings (internal) = 0.23*19.5*2.87 *0.5 = 6.45 KN/m

Structural Analysis Report

7.2 Analysis Procedures
7.2.1 Code Based Design

Analysis procedure of the code based design is shown in the table below.
Table 1: Analysis Procedures for Code Base Design

Load Case Analysis Procedures

Gravity load Linear Static & Response Spectrum

Earthquake load Linear Static & Response Spectrum

Live Load Linear Static & Response Spectrum

7.2.2 Seismic Weight

The seismic weight at each level, Wi, were taken as the sum of the dead loads and the seismic live
loads between the mid-heights of adjacent storeys. 100% of dead load, superimposed dead load and
30% of live load up to 3 kN/m2 and 60% of live load above 3 KN/m2 were considered as mass
source.
To determine the seismic load, it is considered that the country lies in the seismic zone according to
NBC 105-2020. The soil type is considered as medium with 5% damping to determine average
response acceleration. The building is analyzed as moment resisting frame without consideration of
infill wall.
(Height of the building from foundation or from
Height of Building (H) = 11.690m
top of a rigid basement.)
Seismic Zone Factor (Z) = 0.35 Ref (Cl 4.1.4)
Importance Factor (I) = 1 Ref (Cl 4.1.5)
Soil Type = D Soil type D
Structure type = Moment resisting concrete frame
(Kt)= 0.075 Ref (Cl 5.1.2)
Approximate Fundamental Period of Vibration:
(T1) = KtH0.75= 0.474Sec Ref (Cl 5.1.2)
Amplification of approximate period:
T1=1.25*T1= 0.593Sec Ref (Cl 5.1.3)
Method of Analysis= Equivalent Static Method
Lower period of flat part of spectrum
Ta = 0 Ref (Cl 4.1.2)

Structural Analysis Report

 Lower period of flat part of spectrum
Tc = 2 Ref (Cl 4.1.2)
Peak spectral acceleration normalized by PGA
α= 2.25 Ref (Cl 4.1.2)
Coefficient that controls the descending branch of the spectrum
K= 0.8 Ref (Cl 4.1.2)
Spectral shape factor
Ch(T) = 2.25 Ref (Cl 4.1.2, Eq. 4.1(2))
Elastic site spectra for horizontal loading
C(T)=Ch(T) Z I= 0.7875 Ref (Cl 4.1.1, Eq. 4.1(1))
Elastic site spectra for Serviceability Limit State (SLS)
Cs(T)= 0.2* C(T) = 0.1575 Ref (Cl 4.2, Eq. 4.2(1))
Ductility Factor
Ductility factor for Ultimate Limit State (ULS)
Rμ = 4 Ref (Cl 5.3.1, Table 5-2)
Overstrength Factor
Overstrength factor for ULS
Ωu = 1.5 Ref (Cl 5.4.1, Table 5-2)
Overstrength factor SLS
Ωs = 1.25 Ref (Cl 5.4.2, Table 5-2)
Horizontal base shear coeffieicent for ULS,
Cd(T1)=C(T1)/(Rμ*Ωu)= 0.131 Ref (Cl 6.1.1, Eq. 6.1(1))
Horizontal base shear coeffieicent for SLS,
Cd(T1)=Cs(T1)/Ωs = 0.126 Ref (Cl 6.1.2, Eq. 6.1(2))
Exponent related to the structural period (K)
K= 1.046 Ref (Cl 6.3)
Accidental Eccentricity
e= 0.100 Ref (Cl 5.7)

7.2.3 Linear Static Procedure (LSP)

Linear static analysis is carried out for gravity and earthquake loadings.

Modal Participating Mass Ratios

Structural Analysis Report

 Period
Case Mode RX RY RZ SumRX SumRY SumRZ
sec
Modal 1 1.087 0.4247 0.0007 0.1413 0.4247 0.0007 0.1413
Modal 2 0.994 0.0015 0.4382 0.0005 0.4262 0.4389 0.1418
Modal 3 0.865 0.0291 0.002 0.7151 0.4553 0.441 0.8569
Modal 4 0.36 0.432 0.0021 0.012 0.8874 0.4431 0.8689
Modal 5 0.341 0.003 0.4908 0.0001 0.8904 0.9339 0.8689
Modal 6 0.304 0.0406 0.0018 0.0842 0.931 0.9356 0.9531
Modal 7 0.216 0.0401 0.0001 0.0001 0.9711 0.9357 0.9532
Modal 8 0.212 0.0002 0.0371 0.0002 0.9713 0.9728 0.9534
Modal 9 0.198 0.0008 0.0003 0.0346 0.9721 0.9731 0.988
Modal 10 0.162 0.0155 0.0114 3.006E-05 0.9876 0.9846 0.988
Modal 11 0.162 0.0122 0.0151 0.0001 0.9998 0.9997 0.9881
Modal 12 0.149 0.0002 0.0003 0.0119 1 1 1

7.2.4 Component and Member Design

The structural components are designed to satisfy the strength and ductility requirements. Strength
capacities for different types of actions considered in the design are summarized in the table below.
Table 2: Component and Member Design

Structural Component Design Approach/Consideration Code Reference

System
Special RC RC beams Flexural response IS 456:2000
moment- Shear
resisting frame RC columns Compression IS 456:2000
(SMRF) Flexure
Shear
Footings Bearing capacity of soil IS 456:2000
Flexural, shear
RC connections Moment connections IS 456:2000
Shear connections

7.2.5 Static Check:

Seismic Weight W = 5111.49 KN

From IS Code,

Structural Analysis Report

Sa/g = 2.5

Ah = 0.09

Base Shear

For EQ ULS V = 669.60 KN

For EQ SLS V = 644.04 KN

7.2.6 Drift Check:

As per Cl. no. 7.11.1 of NBC 105, the story drift in any story due to specified design lateral force
with partial load factor of 1.0, shall not exceed 0.025 times the story height. From the analysis the
displacements of the mass center of various floors are obtained and are shown in along with story
drift.
Drift Check
Allowable Drift Ratio, ULS
dmax = 0.025/Rμ = 0.00625 Ref (Cl 5.6.3)
Allowable Drift Ratio, SLS
dmax = 0.006/Rs = 0.006 Ref (Cl 5.6.3)

Story Drift EQULSx

Story Elevation Location X-Dir Y-Dir
m
Top 12.7 Top 0.000515 0.000016
2nd 9.525 Top 0.002852 0.000074
1st 6.35 Top 0.004741 0.000131
Ground 3.175 Top 0.004036 0.000097
Base 0 Top 0 0

Story Drift EQULSy

Story Elevation Location X-Dir Y-Dir
m
Top 12.7 Top 0.000056 0.000772
2nd 9.525 Top 0.00028 0.003571
1st 6.35 Top 0.000397 0.005763
Ground 3.175 Top 0.000303 0.004683
Base 0 Top 0 0

Structural Analysis Report

 Story Drift EQSLSx
Story Elevation Location X-Dir Y-Dir
m
Top 12.7 Top 0.000496 0.000016
2nd 9.525 Top 0.002744 0.000072
1st 6.35 Top 0.00456 0.000126
Ground 3.175 Top 0.003882 0.000093
Base 0 Top 0 0

Story Drift EQSLSy

Story Elevation Location X-Dir Y-Dir
m
Top 12.7 Top 0.000054 0.000742
2nd 9.525 Top 0.00027 0.003435
1st 6.35 Top 0.000382 0.005543
Ground 3.175 Top 0.000291 0.004505
Base 0 Top 0 0

Hence, all the story drift are in permissible limit.

Displacement Check
Allowable ratio ULS= 0.025 Ref (Cl 5.6.3)
Allowable ratio SLS= 0.006 Ref (Cl 5.6.3)
Allowable Displacement ULS
dmax = 0.025H/Rμ = 79.375mm Ref (Cl 5.6.3)
Allowable Displacement ULS
dmax = 0.006H/Rs = 76.2mm Ref (Cl 5.6.3)

Story Displacement EQULSx

Story Elevation Location X-Dir Y-Dir
m mm mm
Top 12.7 Top 38.56 0.973
2nd 9.525 Top 36.925 0.977
1st 6.35 Top 27.868 0.741
Ground 3.175 Top 12.814 0.326
Base 0 Top 0 0
Story Displacement EQULSy

Structural Analysis Report

 Story Elevation Location X-Dir Y-Dir
m mm mm
Top 12.7 Top 3.287 46.957
2nd 9.525 Top 3.112 44.506
1st 6.35 Top 2.222 33.166
Ground 3.175 Top 0.961 14.87
Base 0 Top 0 0
Story Displacement EQSLSx
Story Elevation Location X-Dir Y-Dir
m mm mm
Top 12.7 Top 37.089 0.936
2nd 9.525 Top 35.515 0.94
1st 6.35 Top 26.805 0.713
Ground 3.175 Top 12.325 0.314
Base 0 Top 0 0

Story Displacement EQSLSy

Story Elevation Location X-Dir Y-Dir
m mm mm
Top 12.7 Top 3.162 45.164
2nd 9.525 Top 2.994 42.807
1st 6.35 Top 2.137 31.9
Ground 3.175 Top 0.925 14.302
Base 0 Top 0 0

Hence, all the story displacement are in permissible limit.

7.2.7 Wind Loads:

Wind and seismic loads shall not be taken to act simultaneously. Kathmandu being high seismic area
Seismic Forces is expected to govern and hence Wind load have not been considered in design.

7.2.8 Other Loads:

Following effects expected to be insignificant shall be ignored:

Shrinkage, creep and temperature stresses, excepting special cantilevers.
Erection loads (for usual cast-in-situ framed structure DL+LL shall be more severe)

Structural Analysis Report

7.3 Load Combinations:
The load combinations are based on NBC 105-2020. The following load combinations are
specified as per NBC 105, Cl: 3.6. For Non Parallel Structure
1.2DL + 1.5LL
DL + λLL + (Ex + 0.3Ey)
DL + λLL + (0.3Ex + Ey)
Where, λ = 0.6 for storage facilities = 0.3 for other usage.

8.0 Design Procedure

The RCC design shall be based on provisions laid down in IS: 456-2000: Code of practice for plain
and reinforced concrete, following Limit state philosophy. Structural design for typical members
has been done for the combination of loads that produces maximum stress in the structural
elements, and in turn requires maximum reinforcing steel provisions.

The design of Columns and Beams is done directly using ETABS 19.0.0 version design software.

The design of Slab, staircase and retaining wall is done by consultant developed Worksheets in
Excel.

9.0 Serviceability Requirements (Control of Deflection)

In order to control deflection of structural elements, two alternative methods in the Serviceability
Limit State Design are envisaged in Indian Code. The first is by way of calculating the actual
deflection as per clause 23.2 (a), (b) of IS: 456-2000 and restricting it to specified values. The
second method envisages “deemed-to-satisfy” provisions such as limiting the span / depth ratio as
per clause 23.2.1 of IS: 456-2000.
The structural design shall satisfy the following requirements serviceability:

 IS: 456-2000 limits final deflection of slab or beam from as cast level to L/250, L being the
effective span of the member. The deflection after erection of partitions and completion of
finishes is limited to lesser of L/325 and 20 mm.

 IS: 456-2000 limits the storey to 0.004 times the storey height with partial load factor of 1.

Structural Analysis Report

  NBC-105 limits horizontal sway of a floor level relative to adjacent floor levels to 0.01h, h
being the storey height, and the upper limit to this relative sway is 60 mm. The
displacements obtained from the analysis results were scaled up 5/K times as per clause 9.1,
and then compared with the limitations.

10.0 Ductile Detailing

Detailing provisions of IS : 13920 have been followed as applicable for a Special Moment
Resisting Frame with shear walls, in order to provide appropriate ductile properties to the structure
and improve Seismic Response of the structure.

Salient features are as follows:

Special confinement zone adjacent to each beam column joint is defined, for beams the length is
equal to twice the beam effective depth and for columns it is largest of:

a) Largest sectional dimension of column

b) One sixth of clear height
c) 450 mm
For soft storeys the entire storey height is the special confinement zone. Also for columns where
the point of contra flexure does not lie within the central half of storey height, the special confining
reinforcement needs to be provided over the full storey.

For columns within the special confinement zone:

Length of laterally unsupported tie shall not exceed 300 mm.
Minimum sectional area (Ash) of ties is related to unsupported length (s), grade of materials (fck
and fy) and ratio of core area (Ac) to actual gross sectional area (Ag) of column, as
Ash=0.18s.h.fck/fy (Ag/Ac-1)
Spacing of ties shall not exceed 100 mm, shall not exceed one fourth of smallest column sectional
dimension and need not be less than 75.
Shear strength with ties shall not be less than 1.4 times ratio of sum of moment of resistance (top
tension for one and bottom tension for the other) of beams framing into the column to the distance
between mid heights of column in adjacent storeys.
Laps in columns shall be permitted only within a specific zone near mid storey height. Tie spacing
in the lap splice zones shall not be less than 150 mm

Structural Analysis Report

For beams, within the confinement zone:
Stirrup spacing shall not exceed one fourth the effective depth.
Shear strength shall be at least the gravity load shear plus 1.4 times ratio of sum of moments of
resistance (top tension for one end and bottom tension for the other end) to the span of beam.

Lap splices shall not be provided within:

a) a joint

b) the special confinement zone

c) 25% of span length adjacent to joint, where flexural yielding may occur under seismic forces.
Stirrup spacing over the lap splices shall not be less than 150 mm
Shear walls are provided with boundary elements at ends detailed as per requirements of columns
but the entire storey height is considered as a special confinement zone. Where boundary element is
not provided the rules are applicable to the entire wall section.
It may be specifically noted that the norms of ductility detailing impose a few additional problems
during construction. Due to the placement of closely spaced stirrups and ties passing through the
beam column junctions, the placement of reinforcement and concreting needs to be done with
utmost care.

11.0 Foundation

11.1 Design of Foundation

The bearing capacity adopted for the isolated foundation design of the building is Safe bearing
pressure: 120 KN/m2 (Geotechnical Investigation work DUDBC). Raft footing is designed using
CSI safe software.

i) Strap Footing

Along A-A/2-3
Working Load carry by column 319.86 KN Factored load 351.8 KN
A (PA)= (PAu)= 46
Working Load carry by column 455 KN Factored load 500.5 KN
B(PB)= (PBu)= 2
sizeof column A x-dir A 350 mm
y-dir A 350 mm
size of column B x-dir B 350 mm

Structural Analysis Report

 y-dir B 350 mm
c/c distance between column A & B (x')= 3.88 m
consderi
ng;
unit weight of soil 20 KN/
(We)= m2
Angle of repose (φ) 30 degree
=
safe bearing of capacity of 120 KN/
soil(sqc)= m2
characteristic strength of 20 N/
concrete(fck)= mm2
characteristic strength of 500 N/
steel(fy)= mm2

1. Depth of
foundation:
h=

= 0.667 1 m
The base of foundation is located at the depth of 1m below which soil is not
subjected to seasonal volumn
changes caused by alternate wetting and
drying;

2. Footing
dimensions:

assuming selfweight of footing=10% of

(PA+PB)
Total service load= (PA+PB)+10% of (PA+PB)
= 852.368 KN
Required area of footing (Af)= 7.10 m2

L1B1 +L2B2 = 7.10 m2 …….(i)

L1,B1 :- length and width of footing under exterior

column A
L2,B2 :- length and width of footing under interior
column B
considering ; 1.65 m
B1=B2=B=
L1+L2 4.305 …….
= (ii)

Structural Analysis Report

c/c distance between column A & m
B (x)= 3.88
c.g. of column loads from the axis of
column A (x')=
x'= 2.28 m
the distance of c.g. of column loads from the left edge column 2.453 m
A (x")=
distance of the centroid of the whole area from the left edge of
column A;

L1B1*L1/2+L2B2*( …….
x-dirA/2+x)=(L1B1+L2B2)*x" (iii)

(L1^2)/2+L2*(
(x-dirA)/2+x)=(L1+L2)*x"
(L1^2)/2+L2*( (x-dirA)/2+x)= 10.562
(L1^2)/ 4.055 L2 = 10.56
2+
substituting the value of L1 as 4.305 -L2
L1=
L2^2 + -0.500 L2 + -2.59 = 0
L2 = 1.879 m
L1 = 2.426 m
L1= 1.650 m L2 = 1.65 m

3. Design of footing slab

a. Thickness of the footing based on moment:

The effective thickness of footing may be determined by considering singly
reinforced balanced section;
Pu = net upward ultimate soil
pressure
= 213.466 KN/m2
The width of beam is considered as the max width of 230 mm
pedestal =
Cantilever projection of the footing slab = 0.71 m
Maximum bending moment per meter 107.61 KNm
width =
Equating Mu,lim to
Mu;
k fck b 107.61 k= 0.133 ( for 500 N/
d^2 = Fe= mm2
)

Structural Analysis Report

 d= 201.13 mm
b.Thickness of footing based on one way
shear
The effective thickness of footing may be determined by considering that the shear is
resisted without
shear reinforcement as follows;

or; d=

Vu,max maximum ultimate shear per unit width at a section at distance d from the face
= of beam
= Pu(0.5B-0.5b-d)
here; Pu= 213.47 KN/m2
B= 1.65 m
b= 230.00 mm
Taking ; bo= 1.00 m
shear strength of concrete in
foundaation
k which may be taken as 1.0 for assumed 300mm *shear strength of
total depth concrete
which may be taken as its minimum value of 0.36 N/mm2 on
consideration that the
flexural reinforcement shall be small due to large depth of foundation slab on
shear consideration
= 0.36 N/mm2
Therefo
re;

or, d= 0.2643 m
Therefo the thickness of footing is governed by one way
re; shear.
Hence; d= 264.29 mm
and , D= 264.29 mm + clear cover of 50mm + (assumed
diameter)/2
Providin 12 mm φ at a clearcover = 40 mm
g
D= 310.29 mm
consider D= 450 mm
;
effective depth (d) = 404 mm
A uniform thickness 450 mm upto a distance of 404 mm

Structural Analysis Report

 of
and then it is reduced linearly to 200mm at (from the face of
the edge; footing beam)
Provided overall depth (D) = 450 mm d= 404 mm
Mu/bd2 0.659
=
Percentage of steel required
pt % 0.158 pt,lim 0.758 % ( for 500 N/mm2
% = Fe= )
Ast = 637.79 mm2
Spacing 12 mm φ bar 177.32 mm c/c
of

Provided spacing of 12 mm φ @ 100 mm

bar c/c

Actual area of steel provided = 1130.9 mm2

4
percentage of steel provided (Pt% 0.280 % rebar percent
provided) = OK
For the development length , the following conditon should be
satisfied,
Length of bar Ld
beyond the face of
beam
0.5(B-b)-clearcover of 25mm Ld =

= 685 = 679.688 mm ( for 20 N/

Fck= mm2
)
Hence, it is safe τbd= 1.2 N/
mm2
Distribution steel = 0.12% of bd
= 484.8 mm2
spacing 12 mm dia require 233.28 mm c/c
of d
provided spacing of 12 mm dia 200 mm c/c
Design of strap
beam
The maximum bending moment for the strap beam will occur where the shear
force is zero.
Let , zero shear force occur at a distance x''' from left edge of
column A;
x''' = 1.362 m (from left edge) x''' 1.4211 m (form right

Structural Analysis Report

 = edge)
Maxiumum B.M = -90.93 KNm Maxiumum - KNm
B.M = 268.0
4
Then, Maximum Bending Moment - KNm
(Mu,max) = 268.043
7
Conside
r
The width of beam is considered as the max width of 300 mm
pedestal =
Equating Mu,lim to
Mu,
Mu = k fck b ……. k= 0.133 ( for 500 N/
d^2 (iv) Fe= mm2
)

d = 580 mm
let , 16 at a clearcover of 25 mm
mm =
overall depth = 612.56 mm
Provide an overall depth of = 650 mm
Thus, effective depth 617 mm
=
2.347

pt % = 0.643 pt,lim 0.758 % ( for 500 N/mm2

% = Fe= )
Therefo Ast = 1190.67 mm2
re,
Provide 3 16 + 2 12
mm mm

Provded Ast = 1206.34 mm2 provided pt% 0.652 %

=
Check for shear

S.F. at distance 'd' from the face of the -139.20 KN

column A =
S.F. at distance 'd' from the face of the 341.94 KN
column B =
Nominal shear stress at column A 0.75 N/mm2
=

Structural Analysis Report

Nominal shear stress at column B 1.85 N/mm2
=
percentage of steel provided (pt 0.652 %
%) =
permiss = 0.540 N/mm2
ible
shear
stress
shear reinforcement is require at column A
shear reinforcement is require at column B
Spacing shear reinforcement ;

2 - legged stirrups of 8
dia mm
Sv = 570.71 mm c/c min of 0.75d 462.75 mm & 450 mm
=
min. shear reinforcement
criteria
302.47 mm c/c
Provide shear stirrups 2- legged stirrups of 8mm dia @
of 200mmc/c

Reinforcement details
a) Column
Column Size 350x350 mm
Ties
GF 1st Floor 2nd Floor Top

4-20mm+4- 4-12mm+4-
C1(A1,A3) 8-16mm -
16mm 16mm
Provide 8mm
4-20mm+4- 4-20mm+4- 4-20mm+4- dia Shear
C2(A2) -
16mm 16mm 16mm reinforcement
4- at 4'' at the
4-20mm+4- 4-20mm+4- end and 6''
C3(B1,B3,D1,D3) 8-16mm 12mm+4-
16mm 16mm spacing at
16mm
middle
4-
4-20mm+4- 4-20mm+4- 4-20mm+4-
C4(D2,C1,C2,C3) 20mm+4-
16mm 16mm 16mm
16mm

b) Beam
Beam End-Section Mid-Section Ties
Reinforcement

Structural Analysis Report

 Floor
Plinth 2-16mm+1-
Top 2-16mm
(Size:9''x12'') 12mm
Bottom 2-16mm 2-16mm
Ground (Size 2-16mm+1-
Top 2-16mm
9''x1'5'') 20mm
2-16mm+1- Provide 8mm
Bottom 2-16mm
20mm dia Shear
2-16mm+1- reinforcement
1st (Size 9''x1'5'') Top 2-16mm
20mm at 4'' at the
2-16mm+1- end and 6''
Bottom 2-16mm
20mm spacing at
2nd (Size 9''x1'5'') Top 3-16mm 3-16mm middle
Bottom 3-16mm 3-16mm
2-12mm+1- 2-12mm+1-
Top (Size 9''x1'5'') Top
16mm 16mm
2-12mm+1- 2-12mm+1-
Bottom
16mm 16mm

c) Slab Reinforcement

shorter span longer span Thickness

8mm @ 150mm 8mm @ 150mm 125mm

d) Footing Reinforcement

Footing L (m) B(m) H(mm)

Strap Footing 1.65 1.65 500
Reinforcement: 3-16mm (Top Bar) +3-16mm (Bottom Bar) and 2-12mm mid section

12.0 Analyses & Design Output

The architectural plans of building are attached

Internal stress details in the frame of building are in ANNEX-1

Reinforcement details in the frame of building are in ANNEX-2

Structural Analysis Report

 ANNEX-1:
Internal stress details of Seismic Load in
the frame of building

Bending Moment

Structural Analysis Report

Frame A-A

Frame 1-1
Structural Analysis Report
Structural Analysis Report
Shear Force
Frame A-A

Structural Analysis Report

Frame 1-1

Structural Analysis Report

 ANNEX-2:
Reinforcement details in the frame of
building

Structural Analysis Report

Reinforcement Requirement

Frame A-A

Structural Analysis Report

Frame 1-1

Structural Analysis Report

Slab Design

Design of Slab (C-D/2-3)

fy= 500 fck = 25
Priliminary
determination of
depth of slab
type of slab L/d ratio
simply supported 28
one side continuous 30
both side
continuous 32

clear size of 4.52 * 3.88

width length

For the critical

sectoin of the slab
effective spans will
be
lx = 4.6262 m
ly = 3.985 m
ly/lx = 0.8613981

effect
ive
assume over all depth m
depth of 125 mm = 105 m

from page 91
IS456:2000

Negative short span

coefficient (αx)'= 0.067
positive short span
coefficient (αx)= 0.050

Negative long span (αy)' = 0.047

Structural Analysis Report

 coefficient
positive long span
coefficient (αy) = 0.035

0.125*2 kn/
Dead load of slab= 5 = 3.125 m2
live load = 4 kn/m2
finish load = 1.4

total load = 8.525 kn/m2

Factored total load 1.5*8.52
= 5
w= 12.7875 kn/m2
positive moments
0.05*12.7875*4. 13.68 knm/
Mx = 6262^2 = 373 m
0.035*12.7875*4 9.578 knm/
My = .6262^2 = 61 m
negative moments
0.0665*12.7875* 18.19 knm/
Mx' = 4.6262^2 = 936 m
0.047*12.7875*4 12.86 knm/
My' = .6262^2 = 271 m
Effective depth of 72.63
slab (d)= 041 mm
mm
with
over
all
adopt effective depth m
depth of 105 of 125 m

long edge =
0.75*3.9 2.988
middle strips 85 = 75 m
0.125*3. 0.498
edge strips 985 = 125 m
short edge =
0.75*4.6 2.988
middle strips 262 = 75 m
edge strips= 0.125*4. = 0.578 m

Structural Analysis Report

 6262 275
Positive
Reinforcement
Area of steel along
short span
Reinforcement in
middle strips=

Area of
reinforce
ment
(Ast)x

fyAst
BM= 0.87 fyAst * (d  )
fck  b

where ,
13.68
Bm = 373 knm
fy = 500
d= 105 mm
n/
fck = 25 mm2
b= 1 m

by
solving
Ast = 319 mm2
minimum
reinforcement
Ast= 150 mm2
design
Ast= 319
mm bars mm 0.261 %
Use 8 @ 240 c/c (pt= 667 )
provided 327.0
Ast= 833 mm2

reinforcement in
edge strips
Minimum Ast= 150 mm2
use 8 mm bars 520 mm (pt= 0.120 %

Structural Analysis Report

 @ c/c 769 )

Area of steel along

long span
Reinforcement in
middle strips=

Area of
reinforce
ment
(Ast)x
fyAst
0.87 fyAst * (d  )
BM= fck  b

where ,
9.578
Bm = 61 knm
fy = 415
d= 95 mm
n/
fck = 25 mm2
b= 1 m

by
solving
Ast = 295 mm2
minimum
reinforcement
Ast= 240 mm2
design
Ast= 295
mm bars mm 0.241 %
Use 8 @ 260 c/c (pt= 538 )
provided 301.9
Ast= 231 mm2

reinforcement in
edge strips
Minimum Ast= 240 mm2
mm bars mm 0.196 %
use 8 @ 320 c/c (pt= 25 )

Structural Analysis Report

 Negative
Reinforcement
Area of steel along
short span
Reinforcement in
middle strips=

Area of
reinforce
ment
(Ast)x

fyAst
BM= 0.87 fyAst * (d  )
fck  b

where ,
18.19
Bm = 936 knm
fy = 500
d= 105 mm
n/
fck = 20 mm2
b= 1 m

by
solving
Ast = 446 mm2
minimum
reinforcement
Ast= 150 mm2
design
Ast= 446
mm bars mm 0.369 %
Use 8 @ 170 c/c (pt= 412 )
provided 461.7
Ast= 647 mm2

reinforcement in
edge strips
Minimum Ast= 150 mm2
use 8 mm bars 300 mm (pt= 0.209 %

Structural Analysis Report

 @ c/c 333 )

Area of steel along

long span
Reinforcement in
middle strips=

Area of
reinforce
ment
(Ast)x

fyAst
BM= 0.87 fyAst * (d  )
fck  b

where ,
12.86
Bm = 271 knm
fy = 415
d= 95 mm
n/
fck = 20 mm2
b= 1 m

by
solving
Ast = 413 mm2
minimum
reinforcement
Ast= 240 mm2
design
Ast= 413
mm bars mm 0.330 %
Use 8 @ 190 c/c (pt= 526 )
provided 413.1
Ast= 579 mm2

reinforcement in
edge strips
Minimum Ast= 240 mm2
mm bars mm 0.196 %
use 8 @ 320 c/c (pt= 25 )

Structural Analysis Report

 Corner
reinforcement
Ast= 334.5 mm2
mm bars mm 0.392 %
Use 8 @ 200 c/c (pt= 5 )

Check for
deflection
37.0
designed lx/d = 4.6262 / 0.125 = 096
max area of steel
required Ast= 446
max area of steel 461.7
provided = 647
232.4
fs= 825

pt of maximum 0.738
tension steel = 824
modification factor
from graph page 38
IS 456 2000= 1.45

maximum L/d ratio

for the critcal slab= 30
maximum ratio of
Lx/d with
modification = 43.5

Thus Provide
10mm dia bars
@150mm c/c all
types of
reinforcement.

Structural Analysis Report

Staircase Design
Floor to floor height= 3.17 m
Riser (R)= 190 mm
Tread (T)= 250 mm
Landing (L1)=1000 mm
Flight (F1)= 1390 mm
Landing (L2)=1200 mm
Flight (F2)= 550 mm
` Landing (L3)=1200 mm
Flight (F3)= 1390 mm
Landing (L4)=1000 mm
Number of riser in flight 1/fight3 (N1)= 6

Number of riser in flight 2 (N2)= 2

Width of stair= 1000 mm
Impose load= 3 KN/m²
Floor finishes= 1.25 KN/m²
Beam width/Brickwall width (B)= 300 mm

Unit wt. of concrete (ϒ)= 25 KN/m³

Grade of steel (fy)= 500 N/mm²
Grade of concrete (fck)= 25 N/mm²
Design of Landing 1 and Flight F1
Step1: calculation of efffective span
Effective span (Leff)={(N1-1)*T}+L1+(L2/2)+(B/2)

= {(6-1)*250}+1000+600+150
= 3000 mm
Step2: calculation of efffective depth
clear cover (c)= 15 mm IS 456:2000, Table 16
Adopt diameter of bar (Φ)= 12 mm
30 (asssuming constant= 30-40)
Effective depth (d)= (Leff/30)
= 100 mm
Overall Depth (D)= d+(Φ/2)+c
= 100+(12/2)+15
= 121 mm ≈125 mm
Provided eff. depth= 104 mm
Step3: calculation of load
(i) Load on going on projected plan area

Live load= 3*1 =3 KN/m

Floor finish= 1.25*1 =1.25 KN/m
wt. of waist slab= {ϒ*D*√(R2+T2)}/T
= 3.925079617 KN/m

Structural Analysis Report

 wt. of steps= ϒ*0.5*R
= 2.375 KN/m
Total load= 10.55 KN/m
Factored load= 1.5*10.55
= 15.82511943 KN/m
(ii) Load on landing
Live load= 3*1 =3.00 KN/m
Floor finish= 1.25*1 =1.25 KN/m
self wt. of slab= ϒ*D*1
= 3.125 KN/m
Total Load= 7.375 KN/m
Factored load= 1.5*7.38
= 11.0625 KN/m

15.83 KN/m

5.53 KN/m 11.06 KN/m

A B
Y C
x
0.600 m 1.25 m 1.150 m
Ra Rb
3m
Step4: calculation of maximum bending moment and maximum shear force

Taking moment of all forces about point B.

Ra*3= [{(5.53*0.6*(0.6/2+1.25+1.15)}+{15.83*1.25*(1.25/2+1.15)}

+{11.06*1.15*1.15/2)}]
Ra*3= 51.388
Ra= 17.13 KN

Ra+Rb= (5.53*0.6)+(15.83*1.25)+(11.06*1.15)

17.13+Rb= 35.822
Rb= 18.69 KN
Zero Shear Force Point (at a distance x from point Y)

x= {17.129-(5.531*0.6)}/15.825
x= 0.873 m

Taking moment about point C.

Structural Analysis Report

 ∑Mc= (17.129*(0.6+0.873))-(5.531*0.6*(0.6/2+0.87))-(15.83*0.873*0.873/2)

Mmax= 15.31 KN

Step5: Check for depth against bending moment

Mmax= 0.133*fck*b*dreq^2
15.31*10^6= 0.133*25*1000*dreq^2
dreq= 67.85 mm (dreq<dprov). Hence OK

Step6: Designing the reinforcement

Mmax=
15.31*10^6= 0.87*500*Ast*104*[1-{(500*Ast)/(25*1000*104)}]

Ast= 363.8310166 mm²

(Ast)min.= 0.12% of bD
= (0.12/100)*1000*125
= 150 mm²

Spacing= [1000/{363.83/(3.142*12^2)/4}]

= 310.8512754 mm ≈150 mm
Provide 12mm dia. bar @ 150c/c
(Ast)prov.= [1000/{150/(3.142*12^2)/4}]
= 753.9822369 mm²
% of steel prov.= 0.72 %
Step7: Check for shear force
For M25 concrete
Shear strength (Ʈc)= 0.280 N/mm² IS 456:2000, Table-19

Ʈmax=
= (18.69*10^3)/(1000*104)
= 0.180 N/mm² OK

Step8: Check for deflection

(Leff/d)prov.= 3000/104
= 28.85

Basic values
Basic value: (α) = 20 IS 456:2000 Clause 23.2.1 (a)

Modification factor
(β) = 1 IS 456:2000 Clause 23.2.1 (b)
For Tension Reinforcement (γ) = 1.7 IS 456:2000 Clause
23.2.1 ( c) fig 4

Structural Analysis Report

 For Compression Reinforcement (δ) = 1 IS 456:2000
Clause 23.2.1 (d) fig 5
Reduction factor for flanged beam (λ) = 1 IS 456:2000
Clause 23.2.1 (e) fig 6
For Calculating the the factor γ
Steel Stress of service load (fs)=
= 0.58*500*[(Ast.req.)/(Ast.provided)]
= 139.938
(As/bd) %= [753.982/(1000*104)]*100
0.725
From fig. 4 of IS 456:2000, (γ ) = 1.7
Now,
αβγδλ=20*1*1.7*1*1
= 34 (l/d)<αβγδλ OK
Step9: Development length

Ld=
= #NAME?
= #NAME?
Step10: Distribution bar reinforcement detailing

Adopt distribution bar dia.= 8

Spacing= 1000/{150/(3.142/4*8^2)}
= 335.1032164 mm
≤ 450 mm
≤ 520 mm
Spacing provided= 200 mm
Provide a distribution bar of 8mm dia. @200c/c

Design of Landing 2, Flight 2 and Landing 3

Step1: calculation of effective span

Effective span (Leff)={(N2-1)*T}+(L1/2)+(L2/2)

{(2-1)*250}+500+600
1350 mm

Step2: calculation of effective depth

Effective depth (d)= (Leff/30)
= 45 mm
Overall Depth (D)= d+(Φ/2)+c
= 45+(12/2)+15
= 66 mm ≈70 mm
Provided eff. depth= 49 mm

Structural Analysis Report

 Step3: calculation of load
(i) Load on going on projected plan area

Live load= 3.00 KN/m

Floor finish= 1.25 KN/m
wt. of waist slab= 2.198044586 KN/m
wt. of steps= 2.375 KN/m
Total load= 8.82 KN/m
Factored load= 13.23 KN/m
(iI) Load on landing
Live load= 3.00 KN/m
Floor finish= 1.25 KN/m
self wt. of slab= 1.75 KN/m
Total load= 6.00 KN/m
Factored load= 9.00 KN/m

13.23 KN/m

4.50 KN/m 4.50 KN/m

A B

0.600 m 0.55 m 0.600 m

Ra Rb
1.75 m

Step4: calculation of maximum bending moment and maximum shear force

Vmax=
Vmax= 6.34 KN
Moment is maximum at center point of loading diagram shown above.

Mmax= 3.49 KN-m

Step5: Check for depth against bending moment

Mmax= 0.133*fck*b*dreq^2
3.49*10^6= 0.133*25*1000*dreq^2
dreq= 32.42 mm (dreq<dprov). Hence OK

Step6: Designing the reinforcement

Mmax=
3.49*10^6= 0.87*500*Ast*49*[1-{(500*Ast)/(25*1000*49)}]

Structural Analysis Report

 Ast= 176.6678871 mm²

(Ast)min.= 0.12% of bD
= 84 mm²

Spacing= [1000/{176.67/(3.142*12^2)/4}]

= 640.169175 mm ≈150 mm
Provide 12mm dia. bar @ 150c/c
(Ast)prov.= [1000/{150/(3.142*12^2)/4}]
= 753.9822369 mm²
% of stee prov.= 1.54 %

Step7: Check for shear force

For M25 concrete
Shear strength (Ʈc)= 0.280 N/mm² IS 456:2000, Table-19

Ʈmax=
= (6.34*10^3)/(1000*49)
= 0.129 N/mm² OK

Step8: Check for deflection

(Leff/d)prov.= 1350/49
= 27.55

Basic values
Basic value: (α) = 20 IS 456:2000 Clause 23.2.1 (a)

Modification factor
(β) = 1 IS 456:2000 Clause 23.2.1 (b)
For Tension Reinforcement (γ) = 1.5 IS 456:2000 Clause
23.2.1 ( c) fig 4
For Compression Reinforcement (δ) = 1 IS 456:2000
Clause 23.2.1 (d) fig 5
Reduction factor for flanged beam (λ) = 1 IS 456:2000
Clause 23.2.1 (e) fig 6
For Calculating the the factor γ
Steel Stress of service load (fs)=
= 0.58*500*[(Ast.req.)/(Ast.provided)]
= 67.951
(As/bd) %= [753.982/(1000*49)]*100
1.539
From fig. 4 of IS 456:2000, (γ ) = 1.5
Now,
αβγδλ=20*1*1.5*1*1
= 30 (l/d)<αβγδλ OK

Structural Analysis Report

 Step9: Development length

Ld=
Step10: Distribution bar reinforcement detailing

Adopt dis. bar dia.= 8

Spacing= 1000/{84/(3.142/4*8^2)}
= 598.3986007 mm
≤ 450 mm
≤ 245 mm
Spacing provided= 200 mm
Provide a distribution bar of 8mm dia. @200c/c

SUMMARY
For landing 1,Flight1 and Flight3
Provide 12mm dia. bar @ 150c/c
Provide a distribution bar of 8mm dia. @200c/c

For landing2, Flight 2 and Landing 3

Provide 12mm dia. bar @ 150c/c
Provide a distribution bar of 8mm dia. @200c/c

4.1 Joint Reactions

The reactions at the support of column for load combination of (DL + LL) are as follows:
FZ
Story Label Output Case Case Type
kN
Base 1 Reaction 1.2DL+1.5LL Combination 319.86
Base 2 Reaction 1.2DL+1.5LL Combination 727.85
Base 3 Reaction 1.2DL+1.5LL Combination 879.02
Base 4 Reaction 1.2DL+1.5LL Combination 537.54
Base 5 Reaction 1.2DL+1.5LL Combination 455.02
Base 6 Reaction 1.2DL+1.5LL Combination 769.96
Base 7 Reaction 1.2DL+1.5LL Combination 944.3
Base 8 Reaction 1.2DL+1.5LL Combination 660.22
Base 9 Reaction 1.2DL+1.5LL Combination 348.54
Base 10 Reaction 1.2DL+1.5LL Combination 498.57
Base 11 Reaction 1.2DL+1.5LL Combination 691.59
Base 12 Reaction 1.2DL+1.5LL Combination 527.40

Structural Analysis Report

Structural Analysis Report