Processes 09 01959 v3
Processes 09 01959 v3
Review
Recent Trends in Graphitic Carbon Nitride-Based Binary and
Ternary Heterostructured Electrodes for Photoelectrochemical
Water Splitting
Ravindranadh Koutavarapu 1 , Shaik Gouse Peera 2 , Tae Gwan Lee 2 , Chimpiri Rao Myla 3, *, Dong-Yeon Lee 1, *,
Jaesool Shim 4, * and Suresh Kannan Balasingam 5, *,†
1 Department of Robotics and Intelligent Machine Engineering, College of Mechanical and IT Engineering,
Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan 712-749, Korea; [email protected]
2 Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Keimyung University, Daegu 42602, Korea;
[email protected] (S.G.P.); [email protected] (T.G.L.)
3 Department of Physics, Andhra Loyola College, Vijayawada 520-008, Andhra Pradesh, India
4 School of Mechanical Engineering, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan 712-749, Korea
5 Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Norwegian University of
Science and Technology (NTNU), 7491 Trondheim, Norway
* Correspondence: [email protected] (C.R.M.); [email protected] (D.-Y.L.); [email protected] (J.S.);
[email protected] or [email protected] (S.K.B.)
† Current address: Graduate School of Energy and Environment (KU-KIST Green School), Korea University
(KU), Seoul 136-713, Korea.
Abstract: The graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3 N4 ) is a class of two-dimensional layered material. The
ever-growing research on this fascinating material is due to its unique visible light absorption,
Citation: Koutavarapu, R.; Peera, surface, electrocatalytic, and other physicochemical properties that can be useful to different energy
S.G.; Lee, T.G.; Myla, C.R.; Lee, D.-Y.; conversion and storage applications. Photoelectrochemical (PEC) water splitting reaction is one of the
Shim, J.; Balasingam, S.K. Recent promising applications of g-C3 N4 , wherein it acts as a durable catalyst support material. Very recently,
Trends in Graphitic Carbon
the construction of g-C3 N4 -based binary and ternary heterostructures exhibited superior PEC water
Nitride-Based Binary and Ternary
splitting performance owing to its reduced reunion of e-/h+ pairs and the fast transfer of charge
Heterostructured Electrodes for
carriers at the heterostructure interface. This review compiles the recent advances and challenges
Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting.
on g-C3 N4 -based heterostructured photocatalysts for the PEC water splitting reaction. After an
Processes 2021, 9, 1959. https://
doi.org/10.3390/pr9111959
overview of the available literature, we presume that g-C3 N4 -based photocatalysts showed enhanced
PEC water splitting performance. Therefore, it is believed that these materials have tremendous
Academic Editor: Bipro R. Dhar opportunities to act as durable catalyst support for energy-related applications. However, researchers
also considered several limitations and challenges for using C3 N4 as an efficient catalyst support
Received: 1 September 2021 material that must be addressed. This review article provides an overview of the fundamental
Accepted: 29 October 2021 principles of PEC water splitting, the current PEC water splitting research trends on g-C3 N4 -based
Published: 2 November 2021 binary and ternary heterostructured electrodes with respect to different electrolytes, and the other
key factors influencing their photoelectrochemical performance. Finally, the future research direction
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with several recommendations to improve the photocatalytic efficiency of these materials is also
with regard to jurisdictional claims in
provided at the end.
published maps and institutional affil-
iations.
Keywords: g-C3 N4 ; binary and ternary heterostructures; photoelectrochemical water splitting;
hydrogen; photocatalyst
for future generations [5]. Among these, solar energy is considered the most promising
one, due to its earth abundance and non-hazardous nature [6]. However, the wavelength of
solar illumination reaching the earth is greater than 340 nm, containing only a small portion
of UV light (<3%) and a large amount of visible light in the range of 400–800 nm. Therefore,
the design and synthesis of suitable visible-light active semiconductor materials having
a small bandgap are essential to harvest the abundant solar energy for photocatalytic and
other renewable energy-related applications [6,7].
Hydrogen is an attractive green fuel that can be used for many different applications,
such as heating, driving vehicles, and material refining [8,9]. Hydrogen has the poten-
tial to replace fossil fuels due to its highest energy density and the possibility to use in
internal combustion engines and fuel cells, which will be the future for emission-free trans-
portation [10–12]. Moreover, different water splitting techniques have been introduced
for hydrogen production, such as electrochemical, thermochemical, photocatalytic, pho-
toelectrochemical (PEC), and biological hydrogen production [13,14]. Among them, PEC
water splitting is one of the ways to utilize solar energy for hydrogen generation, which
can be further used for many other energy-related applications. [15,16]. Nevertheless,
hydrogen production via PEC water splitting is one of the promising methods due to its
safety factors, non-toxicity, and the final reaction that produces pure hydrogen and oxygen
without any byproducts [17,18].
Processes 2021, 9, 1959 1.2. The Graphitic Carbon Nitride (g-C3N4) Material 3 of 26
The g-C3N4 is a kind of strong allotrope of carbon nitride family having a bandgap of
around 2.7 eV, and typically it is in the form of two-dimensional (2D) nanosheets com-
prising of tri-s-triazines interlayers [34]. The g-C3N4 is one of the graphite-like layered
of tri-s-triazines
structure interlayers
materials (shown in[34]. The g-C
Figure 3 N4 superior
1) with is one of prospects
the graphite-like layered
due to their easestructure
of avail-
materials (shown in Figure 1) with superior prospects due to their ease of availability, low
ability, low price, and environmental friendliness [35].
price, and environmental friendliness [35].
Figure 1.1.Two
Figure Twofundamental
fundamental structural
structural units
units of g-C
of g-C 3N4. Reprinted with permission from reference
3 N4 . Reprinted with permission from reference [36],
[36], Copyright 2018, Royal Society of Chemistry.
Copyright 2018, Royal Society of Chemistry.
Theg-C
The g-C33N
N44 molecular surface contains a large number of π-conjugated planar layers,
π-conjugated planar layers,
which
which have
have anan excellent
excellent complexing
complexing effect
effect with
with high
high stability,
stability, soso the
the material
material has
has been
been
used
used for
forphotocatalytic
photocatalyticand andPEC
PECapplications
applicationsin in
recent
recentyears [37].
years However,
[37]. because
However, of the
because of
utilization of only visible light, fastfast
recombination − /h
of eof + +pairs, low charge separation
the utilization of only visible light, recombination e−/h pairs, low charge separation
efficiency,
efficiency,andandthe
themoderate
moderatespecific
specificsurface
surfacearea,
area,ititcan
canprovide
providefewer
feweractive
activesites,
sites,which
which
reduces
reduces its
its effective
effectiveusage
usageas asaa pristine
pristinephotocatalyst
photocatalyst[38,39].
[38,39]. Thus,
Thus,in in order
ordertotoavoid
avoidthese
these
disadvantages,
disadvantages, the the design
designandandsynthesis
synthesisof ofg-C
g-C33NN44-based semiconductor
semiconductor heterostructures
heterostructures
with
with appropriate
appropriate photocatalytic
photocatalytic properties
properties could
could bebe an
an effective
effectiveapproach
approachfor forenhancing
enhancing
the PEC water splitting efficiency [40,41].
the PEC water splitting efficiency [40,41].
1.3.
1.3. Basic
Basic Principles
Principles of
of PEC
PEC Water
Water Splitting
Splitting
The
The increased accumulationofofgreenhouse
increased accumulation gases
greenhouse has
gases resulted
has in in
resulted a constant increase
a constant in
increase
the global average temperature, enabling a shift in perspective and redirecting the focus
in the global average temperature, enabling a shift in perspective and redirecting the focus
from carbon-based energy resources to carbon-free renewable energy technologies [42,43].
from carbon-based energy resources to carbon-free renewable energy technologies [42,43].
In this context, PEC water splitting has foremost importance, in that it generates4only
Processes 2021, 9, x FOR PEER REVIEW
In this context, PEC water splitting has foremost importance, in that it generates onlyofH272
H2 and O2 at two electrodes without any other polluting gases [5,44]. The schematic
and O2 at two electrodes without any other polluting gases [5,44]. The schematic repre-
representation of the PEC water splitting mechanism is presented in Figure 2.
sentation of the PEC water splitting mechanism is presented in Figure 2.
Figure2.2.Schematic
Figure Schematicrepresentation
representationof
ofPEC
PECwater
watersplitting
splittingmechanism.
mechanism.
Moreover, the PEC-based experiments are performed at room temperature, and the
semiconductor electrodes are fabricated using inorganic compounds, which are stable in
aqueous electrolytes. In contrast, organic-based semiconductor electrodes show poor sta-
Processes 2021, 9, 1959 4 of 26
Moreover, the PEC-based experiments are performed at room temperature, and the
semiconductor electrodes are fabricated using inorganic compounds, which are stable
in aqueous electrolytes. In contrast, organic-based semiconductor electrodes show poor
stability in PEC water splitting reactions [45,46]. The PEC water splitting device employs
quantum solar energy conversion materials in which the semiconductor absorbs incoming
photons, resulting in the electron–hole pairs generation process. The incident sunlight on
the photoanode excites electrons from the valence band to the conduction band, leaving
behind holes in the valence band of semiconductor material [47]. Further, the charge
separation typically occurs by the migration of carriers under the influence of the elec-
tric field, and the charge transfer occurs at the semiconductor/electrolyte interface. In
a photoelectrode, the minority carriers are transported to the electrochemical interface in
order to drive the reaction. For a photoanode, holes oxidize water molecules, and for
a photocathode, electrons reduce the H+ ions at the electrode surface [48].
For the past few years, solar-driven visible-light active semiconductor materials were
combined with g-C3 N4 , which showed a better PEC water splitting performance due to
their enhanced light absorption ability, robust synergistic interface, the enlarged surface
area, and the effective separation of e− /h+ pairs [49]. Furthermore, these g-C3 N4 -based
binary and ternary heterostructured electrodes with various morphologies can significantly
progress the movement of charge carriers at the electrode/electrolyte interface and, in turn,
enhance the PEC water splitting efficiency. However, despite these recent signs of progress,
critical reviews on g-C3 N4 -based binary and ternary heterostructured photoelectrodes for
the PEC water splitting reaction are still lacking. Therefore, this review summarizes the
different types of g-C3 N4 -based binary and ternary heterostructured photoelectrodes used
for PEC water splitting reaction, along with their advantages and limitations.
Figure
Figure 3.3. (a) XRD patterns,
(a) XRD patterns, (b)
(b)HRTEM
HRTEMimageimageofof15%CN@ZO
15%CN@ZOmaterial,
material,(c)(c) optical
optical absorption
absorption spec-
spectra,
tra, (d) Nyquist plots, (e) I-t curves, and (f) charge transfer mechanism of the CN@ZO heterostruc-
(d) Nyquist plots, (e) I-t curves, and (f) charge transfer mechanism of the CN@ZO heterostructured
tured electrode. Reprinted with permission from reference [60], Copyright 2017, Elsevier.
electrode. Reprinted with permission from reference [60], Copyright 2017, Elsevier.
AA novel
novelhybrid
hybridcarbon-doped
carbon-dopedCuO/g-C
CuO/g-C3N N4 (C-CuO/CN) heterostructured electrode
3 4 (C-CuO/CN) heterostructured electrode
was prepared using a facile one-step microwave-supported
was prepared using a facile one-step microwave-supported approach
approach to improve
to improve the PEC
the
performance
PEC performance underunder
visiblevisible
source source
[40]. The [40].crystal
Thephase results
crystal phase confirmed the formation
results confirmed the
of the monoclinic phase of CuO and the interlayer stacking of the CN
formation of the monoclinic phase of CuO and the interlayer stacking of the CN units. units. The morphol-
ogy results
The demonstrated
morphology that the CuO that
results demonstrated seems thetoCuO
be anseems
evenlyto dispersed
be an evenly micro-flowers
dispersed
consisting of intermixed ultrathin nanosheets and distributed
micro-flowers consisting of intermixed ultrathin nanosheets and distributed over the surface of over
CN. Thethe
photoluminescence spectra of C-CuO/CN heterostructured material
surface of CN. The photoluminescence spectra of C-CuO/CN heterostructured material showed a very weak
intensity
showed acompared
very weak tointensity
the CuO, compared
CN, and CuO/CNto the CuO, materials, and CuO/CN
CN, and this enhanced PL activity
materials, and
can
this be ascribedPL
enhanced to the significance
activity of carbonto
can be ascribed dopant, which influences
the significance of carbonlattice defects.
dopant, The
which
C-CuO/CN heterostructured
influences lattice defects. The electrode
C-CuO/CN exhibited the lowestelectrode
heterostructured charge transfer
exhibited resistance
the lowest of
3.48 kΩtransfer
charge cm−2 than the CuOof(18.53
resistance kΩcm
3.48 kΩ cm−−22 )than
and the
CuO/CN (7.69 kΩ
CuO (18.53 cm−2−)2 )electrodes.
kΩ cm and CuO/CN Fur-
thermore,
(7.69 kΩ cm −2photocurrent
the ) electrodes. density of the C-CuO/CN
Furthermore, electrode
the photocurrent is around
density of the −2.85 mA cm−2
C-CuO/CN
at 0 V vs. is
electrode RHE under
around visible
−2.85 −
mAsource,
cm at2 and0 Vit vs.
is around 227%visible
RHE under and 38% higher
source, and than
it isthe CuO
around
and
227%CuO/CN
and 38%electrodes,
higher than respectively.
the CuO and Thus, the carbon-doping,
CuO/CN influence of lattice
electrodes, respectively. Thus, thede-
fects, and the formation
carbon-doping, influence ofof
interfacial interactions
lattice defects, and thesignificantly
formation enhanced the interactions
of interfacial PEC perfor-
mance.
significantly enhanced the PEC performance.
Seza
Seza and
and co-workers
co-workers successfully
successfully constructed
constructed novelnovel photoelectrodes
photoelectrodes made made of of SnO
SnO22
NPs (various loading of 0.175, 0.6, and 11 g) g) decorated over the surface of porous g-C33N
decorated over the surface of porous g-C N44
nanosheets (CN/SN)
nanosheets (CN/SN)using usinga afacile
facilemicrowave
microwave synthesis
synthesis method
method [63].
[63]. TheThe XRDXRD re-
results
sults demonstrated
demonstrated thatCN/SN
that the the CN/SN heterostructured
heterostructured material
material exhibited
exhibited bothboth the 3g-C
the g-C N4
N4 3and
SnO2 phases. The morphology results showed the highly porous structure of CN
Processes 2021, 9, 1959 7 of 26
and SnO2 phases. The morphology results showed the highly porous structure of CN
nanosheets and the irregular shape of SnO2 NPs. The light absorption capacity of het-
erostructured CN/SN electrode enhanced towards the visible-active region compared to
the pristine samples. The CN/SN-0.175 heterostructured electrode exhibited the highest
specific surface area of 195 m2 g−1 compared to the other samples. From the linear sweep
voltammetry (LSV) results, the CN/SN-0.175 heterostructured electrode showed a pho-
tocurrent density of 0.033 mA cm−2 at 1.2 V vs. Ag/AgCl in 0.2 M Na2 SO4 electrolyte
under visible-light irradiation, and this photocurrent value is superior to the remaining
photoelectrodes. This enhanced PEC performance can be ascribed to the formation of
porous nanosheets, enhanced visible-light absorption ability, and the formation of the
interfacial heterostructure.
Novel binary g-C3 N4 combined with carbon nanotubes (CN/CT) heterostructured
film was systematically fabricated on the FTO substrate using a facile polycondensation
method to enhance PEC water splitting ability [52]. The structural and morphological
analysis evidence the formation of CN/CT heterostructured electrodes with synergistic
interfaces. As a result, the light-harvesting capacity systematically improved towards
the visible-active region by the development of heterostructure. Further, the EIS results
validated that the constructed CN/CT heterostructured electrode showed the lowest charge
transfer resistance of 6.5 × 105 Ω, and it is around 9.3 times higher than the pristine CN
electrode. The photocurrent density of the CN/CT heterostructured electrode showed
0.075 mA cm−2 at 1 V vs. Ag/AgCl under visible light, and it is around 11 times superior to
the pure CN photoanode. Thus, combing CN with CT significantly enhanced the electron
conductivity, light-harvesting ability, and the separation of charge carriers, which further
improved the PEC water splitting efficiency. Bakr and co-workers successfully constructed
a binary Z-scheme heterostructured electrode using α-Fe2 O3 nanotubes combined with
various concentrations (1, 2, and 3.75 wt.%) of ruptured tubular g-C3 N4 (FO/CN) using an
electrostatic self-assembly technique [64]. The XRD results revealed that both crystal phases
were presented in the FO/CN heterostructured electrode. The morphology results showed
that the α-Fe2 O3 nanotubes were anchored over the tubular g-C3 N4 , and the bandgap mod-
ification was detected for the FO/CN heterostructured material. The EIS results exhibited
the lowest charge transfer resistance value for FO/CN-1 sample. Furthermore, the FO/CN-
1 heterostructured electrode showed the highest photocurrent density of 0.0055 mA cm−2
at 1 V vs. SCE in 0.1 M Na2 SO4 electrolyte under sunlight. This improvement in the PEC
performance was due to the morphological interfaces, heterostructure formation, and quick
transportation of charge carriers.
Novel binary heterostructured electrodes made of BiOI nanoplates combined with
multilayered g-C3 N4 (BI/CN-M) and few-layered g-C3 N4 nanosheets (BI/CN-S) were
systematically synthesized using a simple solvothermal technique for the enhancement of
PEC water splitting reaction [65]. The XRD results showed the formation of the tetragonal
phase of BiOI and the interlayer stacking of CN, and both crystal phases have appeared in
the BI/CN-S heterostructured electrode. The morphology results demonstrated that the BI
nanoplates were decorated over the CN-S nanosheets, which confirmed the establishment
of the heterostructured material. Further, the FTIR and Raman spectra results evidently
showed the synergistic interactions among BI and CN materials. From the EIS results, the
BI/CN-S heterostructured electrode showed the lowest charge transfer resistance than the
pure BI, CN, and BI/CN-M electrodes. Moreover, the observed photocurrent density of
BI/CN-S heterostructured electrode was around 0.20 mA cm−2 at −0.5 V vs. Ag/AgCl in
0.1 M Na2 SO4 under visible-light irradiation, and the current density value was superior
to BI/CN-M (0.16 mA cm−2 ), BI (0.09 mA cm−2 ), CN-M (0.05 mA cm−2 ), and CN-S
(0.04 mA cm−2 ) electrodes. The enhanced water-splitting ability of the heterostructure
material was attributed to the enlarged light absorption ability, the diminished reunion of
charge carriers, and the synergistic trap passivation in the heterostructured electrode.
Liu and colleagues constructed the well-designed TiO2 nanotube arrays (TNTAs) and
dispersed the g-C3 N4 nanoparticles over TNTAs using anodic oxidation followed by calci-
Processes 2021,9,9,1959
Processes2021, x FOR PEER REVIEW 88 of
of2625
nation methods
calcination [66]. The
methods formation
[66]. mechanism
The formation of g-C3 Nof4 /TNTAs
mechanism (CN-TN)
g-C3N4/TNTAs heterojunction
(CN-TN) hetero-
was schematically
junction represented
was schematically in Figure 4a.
represented inThe crystallographic
Figure results showed
4a. The crystallographic the anatase
results showed
phase of TiOphase
the anatase 2 and interlayer
of TiO2 and stacking of g-C
interlayer 3 N4 , which
stacking of g-Csignificantly confirmed the
3N4, which significantly forma-
confirmed
tion of heterojunctions. The morphology results from Figure 4b–d showed
the formation of heterojunctions. The morphology results from Figure 4b–d showed3 that that the g-C N4
nanosheets covered the walls of the TiO nanotubes. From the LSV results
the g-C3N4 nanosheets covered the walls 2of the TiO2 nanotubes. From the LSV results (Fig- (Figure 4e),
the −2 and−2
urephotocurrent density of
4e), the photocurrent CN-TN
density electrode
of CN-TN was observed
electrode aroundaround
was observed 0.86 mA cmmA
0.86 cm
isand
nearly double
is nearly that that
double of pure TNTAs
of pure TNTAselectrode.
electrode.The
Thetransient
transient photocurrent
photocurrent(I-t) (I-t)results
results
(Figure
(Figure4f)4f)demonstrated
demonstratedthat thatthetheCN-TN
CN-TNheterojunction
heterojunctionelectrode
electrodeexhibited
exhibitedaasharpsharpin-in-
crease of photocurrent density with a quick photoresponse compared
crease of photocurrent density with a quick photoresponse compared to the as-prepared to the as-prepared
pristine
pristinesamples.
samples. The
Thecharge
chargetransfer
transferresistance
resistanceofofthe
theCN-TN
CN-TNheterojunction
heterojunctionelectrode
electrode
(Figure
(Figure 4g) was significantly reduced among the other samples underlight
4g) was significantly reduced among the other samples under lightillumination.
illumination.
Thus,
Thus,thetheformation
formationofofbinary
binaryheterojunction
heterojunctionbetween
betweeng-C g-C3 N
3N44 and
and TNTAs
TNTAs (Figure
(Figure4h) 4h)
could significantly
could significantly enhance the transportation of charge carriers and reduce
enhance the transportation of charge carriers and reduce the reunion the reunion of
photo-induced e − /h+ pairs, which in turn enhanced the PEC water splitting efficiency.
of photo-induced e /h pairs, which in turn enhanced the PEC water splitting efficiency.
− +
Figure4.4.(a)
Figure (a)Formation
Formationmechanism
mechanism ofof
CN-TN
CN-TN heterojunction, SEM
heterojunction, SEMimages
imagesof (b)
of TNTAs, (c) CN-TN
(b) TNTAs, (c) CN-
heterojunction, (d) TEM image of CN-TN heterojunction, (e) LSV curves, (f) I-t curves,
TN heterojunction, (d) TEM image of CN-TN heterojunction, (e) LSV curves, (f) I-t curves, (g) Nyquist(g)
plots, and plots,
Nyquist (h) charge transfer
and (h) mechanism
charge of the CN-TN
transfer mechanism of heterojunction. Reprinted with
the CN-TN heterojunction. permission
Reprinted with
permission
from referencefrom reference
[66], [66],
Copyright Copyright
2018, 2018, Springer.
Springer.
Processes 2021, 9, 1959 9 of 26
Liu and co-workers effectively fabricated the g-C3 N4 -coated Fe2 O3 nanoplatelets
(CN/FO) electrodes using the facile electrodeposition followed by chemical vapor deposi-
tion methods [67]. The morphology and structural results demonstrated the distribution of
g-C3 N4 nanoparticles over the surface of Fe2 O3 nanoplatelets. Further, the light-harvesting
ability was significantly enhanced after the formation of CN/FO heterostructuredelectrode,
and the PL intensity was diminished when compared to the pure CN and FO electrodes.
From the EIS analysis, the CN/FO heterostructured photoanode showed the lowest Rct
value compared to the remaining photoanodes. The photocurrent density of the CN/FO
heterostructured electrode showed around 0.78 mA cm−2 at 0.4 V vs. Ag/AgCl in 1.0 M
NaOH under visible light, and it is around 70 times higher than the pure FO photoan-
ode. Therefore, the introduction of CN over the surface of FO considerably enriched the
light-harvesting ability, separation of e− /h+ pairs, and quicker interfacial charge transfer,
which improved the water-splitting ability. Novel binary 2D/2D heterostructured electrode
composed of porous g-C3 N4 and BCN nanosheets (CN/BCN) was successfully fabricated
using a facile thermal polymerization technique [68]. The XRD results demonstrated that
both the crystal phases of CN and BCN were presented in the CN/BCN heterostructured
electrode. The morphology results showed that the porous CN nanosheets were anchored
over the BCN nanosheets. From differential reflectance spectroscopy (DRS) results, the
loading of CN towards BCN could substantially enhance the light-harvesting capability.
The charge transfer resistance of CN/BCN electrode was around 2.8 kΩ, which is 11 times
and five times lesser than CN and BCN electrodes, respectively. Further, the transient
photocurrent density of the CN/BCN electrode is higher than the individual CN and BCN
electrodes. Moreover, the CN/BCN heterostructured electrodes showed a photocurrent
density of 0.62 mA cm−2 at 0.62 V vs. Ag/AgCl in 0.1 M Na2 SO4 electrolyte under visible-
light illumination, which was around 8 and 3 times higher than the CN (0.08 mA cm−2 )
and BCN (0.21 mA cm−2 ) electrodes, respectively. Thus, the morphological 2D interfaces,
superior migration of charge carriers, and the separation of e− /h+ pairs significantly
enhanced the PEC water splitting performance.
Murugan and colleagues systematically fabricated a binary g-C3 N4 /TiO2 (CN/TO)
heterostructured electrode with different concentrations of CN (5, 10, 15, 20, and 25 wt.%)
using a facile in-situ soft template technique (Figure 5a) for the improvement of PEC water
splitting performance [69]. The XRD results (Figure 5b) confirmed the anatase phase of
TiO2 , the interlayer stacking of CN, and both the phases have appeared in the CN/TO
heterostructured electrode. The morphology results (Figure 5c,d) demonstrated that the TO
NPs were decorated over the CN nanosheets. From the EIS analysis (Figure 5e), the CN/TO-
20 photoanode showed the lowest Rct value than the remaining photoanodes. Furthermore,
the photocurrent density (Figure 5f–g) of CN/TO-20 heterostructured electrode was around
0.0723 mA cm−2 at 1.23 V vs. RHE in 1 M KOH electrolyte under visible-light and the
photocurrent density value was superior than the CN (0.00082 mA cm−2 ), TO (0.0366 mA
cm−2 ), CN/TO-5 (0.0472 mA cm−2 ), CN/TO-10 (0.0544 mA cm−2 ), CN/TO-15 (0.0632 mA
cm−2 ), and CN/TO-25 (0.0658 mA cm−2 ) electrodes. The enhanced water splitting ability
was accounted for their enlarged light absorption ability, the diminished reunion of charge
carriers, and synergistic interfacial effect in the heterostructured electrode. The same group,
Murugan and co-workers, successfully fabricated a binary combination of hierarchical
Bi2 MoO6 and various amounts (1, 3, 5, 7, 10, and 12 wt.%) of g-C3 N4 (BMO/CN) using a
solvothermal technique for the enhancement of PEC water splitting ability [70]. The XRD
results revealed the formation of the orthorhombic phase of BMO, the interlayer stacking
of CN, and both the phases have appeared in the BMO/CN heterostructured electrode.
The regulation of the bandgap was detected for the BMO/CN heterostructured electrode
compared to the pure samples, which enlarged the visible-light-harvesting capability. From
the EIS analysis, the BMO/CN-10 heterostructured electrode showed the lowest Rct value,
the photocurrent density of the BMO/CN-10 electrode was around 0.0212 mA cm− 2 at 1.23
V vs. RHE in 1 M KOH electrolyte under visible-light illumination, and the photocurrent
density value was about 28 and 7 times greater than the pristine CN and BMO electrodes,
Processes 2021, 9, 1959 10 of 26
Figure 5.
Figure 5. (a)
(a) Formation
Formation mechanism
mechanism of of CN@TO
CN@TO heterostructured
heterostructured material,
material, (b)
(b) XRD
XRD patterns,
patterns, (c)
(c) SEM
SEM
image of 20-CN@TO material, (d) TEM image of 20-CN@TO material, (e) Nyquist plots, (f)
image of 20-CN@TO material, (d) TEM image of 20-CN@TO material, (e) Nyquist plots, (f) LSV
LSV
curves, (g) I-t curves, and (h) charge transfer mechanism of the CN@TO heterostructured electrodes.
curves, (g) I-t curves, and (h) charge transfer mechanism of the CN@TO heterostructured electrodes.
Reprinted with permission from reference [69], Copyright 2020, Elsevier.
Reprinted with permission from reference [69], Copyright 2020, Elsevier.
of 181.54 m2 g−1 than the pure SN (181.13 m2 g−1 ) and CN/SN-2 mM (178.69 m2 g−1 )
electrodes. From the EIS results, the CN/SN-4 mM heterostructured electrode showed the
lowest charge transfer resistance when compared to the pure CN, SN, and CN/SN-2 mM
electrodes. Furthermore, the photocurrent density of CN/SN-4 mM photoelectrode was
around 2.1 mA cm−2 at 1 V vs. Ag/AgCl in 0.2 M Na2 SO4 under visible-light and it was
around eight times higher than the pure SN electrode. The improved water splitting
performance was owing to the enhanced surface area, light absorption ability, diminished
reunion of charge carriers, and the synergistic effect in the heterostructured interface.
Kumar et al. successfully constructed heterostructured electrodes made of NaNbO3
nanofibers along with different concentrations (2, 4, and 8 wt.%) of g-C3 N4 nanosheets
(NNO/CN) using facile hydrothermal followed by chemisorption techniques (Figure 6a)
for better PEC water splitting performance [31]. The XRD results (Figure 6b) demonstrated
that both the crystal phases of CN (interlayer stacking) and NNO (orthorhombic phase)
were presented in the NNO/CN heterostructured electrode. The surface morphology
images (Figure 6c) confirmed the effective distribution of NNO nanofibers on the surface
of CN nanosheets. The DRS analysis (Figure 6d) showed that the visible-light-harvesting
ability was significantly enhanced in the NNO/CN heterostructure electrode. The EIS
results (Figure 6e) demonstrated that the NNO/CN-4 photoelectrode exhibited the lowest
Rct value, and the I-t results (Figure 6f) indicated that the NNO/CN-4 photoelectrode
showed a sharp increase of photocurrent density with a quicker photoresponse than the
other photoelectrodes. Moreover, the NNO/CN-4 photoelectrode showed a photocurrent
density of 12.5 mA cm−2 at 1 V vs. Ag/AgCl in 0.5 M NaOH electrolyte under visible-light,
which was around three-times higher than the pristine NNO electrode (4.3 mA cm−2 ).
Thus, the formation of heterostructured electrode (Figure 6g) significantly enhanced the
light-harvesting ability, separation of e− /h+ pairs, and quicker interfacial charge transfer,
which significantly improved the water-splitting ability.
A novel binary heterostructured electrode made of Bi2 WO6 quantum dots (QDs)
dispersed on the g-C3 N4 (CN/BWQ) was prepared by a simplistic in-situ hydrothermal
method [72]. The X-ray diffraction results confirmed the interlayer stacking of the CN units
and the orthorhombic phase of BW, even after the formation of a heterostructured electrode.
Furthermore, the morphological examination revealed that the BW QDs were uniformly
distributed over the surface of CN. When compared to the pristine samples, bandgap tuning
was observed for the CN/BWQ heterostructured electrode, which significantly enhanced
the visible-light-harvesting capability. Moreover, the CN/BWQ heterostructured electrode
demonstrated the lowest Rct value, the photocurrent density of CN/BWQ photoanode
was observed around 0.39 µA cm−2 at 1.23 V vs. RHE under visible-light illumination,
and the current density value was about 2.4 and 1.8 times higher than the pristine CN
and BWQ electrodes, respectively. Thus, forming a synergistic interfacial heterostructure
and the Z-scheme mechanism could significantly enhance the water-splitting activity. The
PEC performance of g-C3 N4 -based various binary heterostructured electrodes is presented
in Table 1.
showed a sharp increase of photocurrent density with a quicker photoresponse than the
other photoelectrodes. Moreover, the NNO/CN-4 photoelectrode showed a photocurrent
density of 12.5 mA cm−2 at 1 V vs. Ag/AgCl in 0.5 M NaOH electrolyte under visible-light,
which was around three-times higher than the pristine NNO electrode (4.3 mA cm−2).
Processes 2021, 9, 1959 Thus, the formation of heterostructured electrode (Figure 6g) significantly enhanced the
12 of 26
light-harvesting ability, separation of e−/h+ pairs, and quicker interfacial charge transfer,
which significantly improved the water-splitting ability.
Figure 6. (a) Formation mechanism of NNO/CN heterostructured material, (b) XRD patterns,
(c) TEM image of NNO/CN heterostructured material, (d) optical absorption spectra, (e) Nyquist
plots, (f) I-t curves, and (g) charge transfer mechanism of the NNO/CN heterostructured electrode.
Reprinted with permission from reference [31], Copyright 2020, IOP.
Photocurrent
Synthesis Light
Photoelectrodes Potential (V) Electrolytes Density Ref.
Methods Sources
(mA cm−2 )
g-C3 N4 /ZnO Dip coating 0.5994 vs. RHE 0.5 M Na2 SO4 Visible 0.952 [73]
Pt/g-C3 N4 Dip coating 0 vs. RHE 0.1 M Na2 SO4 Solar −2.5 [74]
g-C3 N4 /CoP Impregnation 0.4 vs. Ag/AgCl 0.05 M Na2 SO4 Solar 0.15 [75]
g-C3 N4 /BiVO4 Hydrothermal 1.23 vs. RHE 1 M KOH visible 0.021 [76]
Electrophoretic
g-C3 N4 /CdS and chemical 0 vs. Ag/AgCl 0.5 M Na2 SO3 Visible 5.4 [77]
bath deposition
Liquid
g-C3 N4 /CNTs 0 vs. SCE 0.5 M Na2 SO4 Visible 0.0018 [78]
exfoliation
Pulsing
g-C3 N4 /SnO2 0.2 vs. Ag/AgCl 0.1 M NaOH Solar 1.8 [79]
electrophoresis
g-C3 N4 /BiVO4 Sol-gel -- vs. Ag/AgCl 0.1 M Na2 SO4 Solar 0.00046 [80]
Mixing
g-C3 N4 /InVO4 0.9 vs. Ag/AgCl 0.1 M Na2 SO4 Solar 0.013 [81]
calcination
g-C3 N4 /In2 S3 Wet chemical 1.5 vs. Ag/AgCl 0.1 M Na2 SO3 Visible 0.005 [82]
Electrophoretic
g-C3 N4 /Cu2 O −0.4 vs. Ag/AgCl 0.1 M NaNO3 Visible −1.38 [83]
deposition
Processes 2021, 9, 1959 13 of 26
Table 1. Cont.
Photocurrent
Synthesis Light
Photoelectrodes Potential (V) Electrolytes Density Ref.
Methods Sources
(mA cm−2 )
Phosphorus Near-
Sintering 1.2 vs. Ag/AgCl 0.5 M Na2 SO4 0.0014 [84]
doped g-C3 N4 infrared
g-C3 N4 /BiVO4 Electrodeposition 1.23 vs. RHE 0.5 M Na2 SO4 Solar 0.42 [85]
g-C3 N4 /CuO Co-precipitation 1.2 vs. Ag/AgCl – Visible 0.68 [86]
g-C3 N4 /MoS2 Solvothermal −0.4 vs. Ag/AgCl 0.1 M PBS Solar 0.037 [87]
g-C3 N4 @CuTi Hydrothermal 0.65 vs. Ag/AgCl 1 M KOH Visible 0.014 [88]
g- Magnetron
−0.3 vs. Ag/AgCl 0.1 M Na2 SO4 Solar 0.004 [89]
C3 N4 /LaFeO3 sputtering
Metal-assisted
g-C3 N4 @Si etching, and
1 vs. Pt 0.5 M Na2 SO4 Visible 0.316 [90]
NWs liquid atomic
layer deposition
Cobalt doped
Calcination Ag/AgCl 0.1 M Na2 SO4 Solar 0.058 [91]
g-C3 N4
g-C3 N4 @CoFe Solvothermal 0.2 vs. Ag/AgCl 1 M KOH Visible 0.196 [92]
Figure
Figure 7.7.(a)
(a)Formation
Formation mechanism
mechanism of CN/Au-SQD
of CN/Au-SQD ternary
ternary heterostructured
heterostructured material,
material, (b) TEM (b) TE
age
imageofof
CN/Au-SQD
CN/Au-SQDheterostructured material,
heterostructured material, (c)(c) optical
optical absorption
absorption spectra,
spectra, (d) PL(d) PL spectra, (
spectra,
curves,
(e) and (f)and
LSV curves, charge transfer
(f) charge mechanism
transfer mechanismofofthetheCN/Au-SQD
CN/Au-SQD ternary heterostructured elect
ternary heterostructured
electrodes. Reprinted
Reprinted with permission
with permission from reference
from reference [96],[96], Copyright2020,
Copyright 2020, Elsevier.
Elsevier.
Figure 8. (a) XRD patterns, (b) TEM image of TO/CN/CNT heterostructured material, (c) Nyquist
plots, (d) LSV curves, and (e) charge transfer mechanism of the TO/CN/CNT ternary heterostruc-
tured electrode. Reprinted with permission from reference [98], Copyright 2020, Elsevier.
To enhance the utility of visible-light and diminish the reunion of charge carriers, a
novel fluorine-doped, chlorine-intercalated g-C3 N4 combined with various concentrations
of BiOI (10, 25, 57, and 75%)-based CNF-Cl/BI heterostructured electrodes was prepared
using a facile in-situ hydrothermal technique by Alam and co-workers [101]. The XRD
results confirmed the interlayer stacking of the CN units and the tetragonal phase of BI even
after the formation of a CNF-Cl/BI heterostructure. The morphology results demonstrated
that the BI nanoplates were uniformly covered on the surface of the CNF-Cl electrode.
The bandgap tuning was observed for the CNF-Cl/BI heterostructured electrode when
compared to pure samples, which significantly enhanced the visible-light absorption ability.
From the EIS results, the CNF-Cl/BI50% heterostructured electrode exhibited the lowest Rct
value than the remaining samples. Moreover, the photocurrent density of CNF-Cl/BI50%
photoanode was observed around 1.28 mA cm−2 at 1.23 V vs. RHE under visible-light
illumination, and the value was around 4.6 and 3.2 times higher than the CNF-Cl and BI
Processes 2021, 9, 1959 18 of 26
Figure 9. (a)
Figure 9. Formationmechanism
(a) Formation mechanism of the
of the BO/Ru/CN
BO/Ru/CN ternary
ternary heterostructured
heterostructured material,
material, (b) XRD (b) XRD
patterns,
patterns, (c) optical absorption spectra, (d) TEM image, (e) HRTEM image of BO/Ru/CN heterostructured hetero-
(c) optical absorption spectra, (d) TEM image, (e) HRTEM image of BO/Ru/CN
structured material,
material, (f) Nyquist (f) Nyquist
plots, plots,
and (g) charge and (g)
transfer charge of
mechanism transfer mechanism
the BO/Ru/CN of heterostructured
ternary the BO/Ru/CN ternary
heterostructured electrode. Reprinted with permission from reference [102], Copyright
electrode. Reprinted with permission from reference [102], Copyright 2019, American Chemical Society. 2019, Amer-
ican Chemical Society.
2. The PEC
Table Patnaik performance
and of g-C
colleagues 3 N4 -based ternary
successfully heterostructured
synthesized photoelectrodes.
the various concentrations (2, 4, 6,
and 8 wt.%) of Cu-promoted Synthesis
MoO3/g-C3N4 (Cu/MO/CN) hybrid Light
heterostructured
Photocurrent elec-
Photoelectrodes Potential (V) Electrolytes Density Ref.
trode using the in-situ pyrolysis
Methods followed by the impregnation techniques
Sources
(mA cm )− [103].
2 The XRD
results confirmed
ZnO/Au/g-C3 N4
that the
Thermalinterlayer
vapor stacking
−0.5 vs. RHE
of the CN units,
0.2 M Na2 SO4
the
Solar
orthorhombic
−0.29 [104]
phase of
condensation
MoO 3, and the heterostructure formation did not influence the individual phase. The mor-
g-C3 N4 /Pt/ZnO Spin coating 0.5 vs. Ag/AgCl 0.5 M Na2 SO4 Solar 0.12 [105]
phological investigation inferred that the irregular-shaped MoO3 nanocrystals and Cu na-
noparticles dispersed on the g-C3N4 surface. Further, the visible-light absorption ability
was improved by forming the heterostructure, and the distribution of Cu NPs was con-
firmed by the occurrence of a surface plasmon resonance band. From the EIS results, the
2% Cu/MO/CN heterostructured electrode exhibited the lowest charge-transfer resistance
value among other samples. Further, the 2% Cu/MO/CN heterostructured electrode
Processes 2021, 9, 1959 20 of 26
Table 2. Cont.
Photocurrent
Synthesis Light
Photoelectrodes Potential (V) Electrolytes Density Ref.
Methods Sources
(mA cm−2 )
g-C3 N4 /Ti-Fe2 O3 Electrodeposition 0.23 vs. Ag/AgCl 1.0 M NaOH Visible 2.55 [106]
g-C3 N4 /TiN-NFG Ultra-sonication 0.11 vs. RHE 0.5 M Na2 SO4 Solar −0.196 [107]
Hydrothermal, chemical
TiO2 @g-C3 N4 /Co-Pi bath deposition, 1.23 vs. RHE 0.1 M Na2 SO4 Solar 1.6 [108]
electrodeposition
electrophoretic
Ag@g-C3 N4 /ZnS 1.23 vs. RHE 0.3 M KCl Visible 0.1 [109]
deposition
Fluorine-dopedg-
In-situ growth 0.6 vs. Ag/AgCl 0.1 M KOH Visible 0.18 [110]
C3 N4 /TiO2
Ti3+ -TiO2 /O-g-C3 N4 Hydrothermal 0.1 vs. Ag/AgCl 0.1 M Na2 SO4 Visible 0.0034 [111]
Chemical bath
TiO2 @P-C3 N4 /Co3 O4 1.23 vs. RHE 0.5 M Na2 SO4 Visible 1.58 [112]
deposition
Calcinations,
electrostatic
NiFe/N-rGO/g-C3 N4 0.8 vs. Ag/AgCl 0.1 M Na2 SO4 Visible −0.97 [113]
self-assembly, and
hydrothermal
5. Future Perspectives
The experimental evidence revealed that g-C3 N4 -could be used as a photocatalyst and
decent catalyst support material for various metal oxide-based heterostructured electrodes
fabrication [29,114]. However, hybridizing the g-C3 N4 with a second carbon component
could further enhance the overall conductivity of the heterostructured electrodes and the
durability of g-C3 N4 catalysts [40,52,115]. Thus far, experimental investigations indicated
that g-C3 N4 -carbon hybrid catalysts could improve the overall PEC performance.
(i) To further improve the photocatalytic activity and water splitting efficiency, innova-
tive strategies are required to synthesize g-C3 N4 -based heterostructured electrodes
with various hierarchical and porous morphologies [70,91,116].
(ii) Most of the reported heterostructured catalysts have been investigated using g-C3 N4
nanosheet morphologies only. It is worth exploring other morphologies of g-C3 N4
such as nanorods, nanoparticles, nanotubes, porous nanosheets, etc. [61,64].
(iii) The simultaneous modification of g-C3 N4 -based heterostructured electrodes through
one or more of the following methods: (i) the rational design of nanoarrays archi-
tectures, (ii) doping of atoms or molecules, and (iii) loading of various co-catalysts.
These strategies can also offer extraordinary improvement of PEC performance due
to the synergetic effect of the different catalytic mechanisms [63,117].
(iv) Moreover, the theoretical and computational screening investigations must be per-
formed to elucidate the charge transfer mechanism, PEC water splitting efficiency,
stability, and strategies for improving the overall photocatalytic activity of g-C3 N4 -
based catalysts.
(v) In addition, these computational studies can serve as a guide for experimentalists,
especially for selecting the optimal materials and making their hybrid compositions.
Therefore, understanding the effect of materials matrices on water splitting perfor-
mance is needed. It will also help to develop the other requirements of catalysts,
such as stability and cost consumption for the real-time application of the PEC water
splitting process.
(vi) Furthermore, electrolytes used in the PEC water splitting have significant influences
on the overall PEC performance. Besides, it is also essential to maintain the system at
a constant temperature to get accurate PEC measurements. Therefore, it is suggested
to utilize water baths or thermostatic systems during the PEC measurements. In
addition, a light source should also be equipped with infrared cut-off filters to block
the unnecessary heating effect and the evaporation of electrolytes.
6. Conclusions
This review summarized and discussed the recent advances in g-C3 N4 -based binary
and ternary heterostructured electrodes for PEC water splitting. The PEC water splitting
is the most straightforward and promising way to produce solar fuels, considering the
Processes 2021, 9, 1959 21 of 26
safety factor, environmental friendliness, and the abundance of solar energy. The process is
usually carried out at room temperature and the usage of inorganic materials, lending the
system robustness, which is difficult to achieve with organic-based photocatalytic materials.
The g-C3 N4 -based binary and ternary heterostructured electrodes exhibit excellent water
splitting performance and stability due to the synergistic interactions with large surface area
and facile transportation of charge carriers. There are certain drawbacks associated with
PEC water splitting; however, they can be overcome by combining it with the biological
processes that are capable of producing a large quantity of hydrogen. The heterostructured
electrodes made of g-C3 N4 with various binary and ternary semiconductor nanostructured
materials are promising photocatalysts in terms of efficient formation of reactive oxygen
species and lower recombination of electrons and holes. From the results mentioned above,
the ternary g-C3 N4 -based heterostructured electrodes exhibited superior photocurrent
densities with lower Rct value and enlarged visible-light absorption capability when com-
pared to the binary g-C3 N4 -based heterostructured electrodes. This phenomenon could be
attributed to the large surface area, synergistic interfaces among the ternary components
with a quick charge carrier transportation, thus eventually reducing the reunion of charge
carriers. Apart from the experiments discussed here, the g-C3 N4 -based heterostructured
electrodes can also be used in various concentrations of different electrolytes with a wide
range of operating potentials. Experimental studies have revealed that g-C3 N4 -based
heterostructured electrodes could act as efficient photocatalyst support materials for PEC
water splitting. However, several bottlenecks still exist that can hinder the use of g-C3 N4
for the PEC water splitting reactions, which needs further elaborative research on this
fascinating material and the other g-C3 N4 -based heterostructured electrode designs.
References
1. Siavash Moakhar, R.; Hosseini-Hosseinabad, S.M.; Masudy-Panah, S.; Seza, A.; Jalali, M.; Fallah-Arani, H.; Dabir, F.; Gholipour, S.;
Abdi, Y.; Bagheri-Hariri, M.; et al. Photoelectrochemical water-splitting using CuO-based electrodes for hydrogen production: A
review. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, 2007285. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
2. Yu, J.M.; Lee, J.; Kim, Y.S.; Song, J.; Oh, J.; Lee, S.M.; Jeong, M.; Kim, Y.; Kwak, J.H.; Cho, S.; et al. High-performance and
stable photoelectrochemical water splitting cell with organic-photoactive-layer-based photoanode. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 5509.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
3. Hamdani, I.R.; Bhaskarwar, A.N. Recent progress in material selection and device designs for photoelectrochemical water-splitting.
Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 138, 110503. [CrossRef]
4. Cen, J.; Wu, Q.; Liu, M.; Orlov, A. Developing new understanding of photoelectrochemical water splitting via in-situ techniques:
A review on recent progress. Green Energy Environ. 2017, 2, 100–111. [CrossRef]
5. Joy, J.; Mathew, J.; George, S.C. Nanomaterials for photoelectrochemical water splitting—Review. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2018, 43,
4804–4817. [CrossRef]
6. Yang, W.; Park, J.; Kwon, H.-C.; Hutter, O.S.; Phillips, L.J.; Tan, J.; Lee, H.; Lee, J.; Tilley, S.D.; Major, J.D.; et al. Solar water splitting
exceeding 10% efficiency via low-cost Sb2 Se3 photocathodes coupled with semitransparent perovskite photovoltaics. Energy
Environ. Sci. 2020, 13, 4362–4370. [CrossRef]
7. Nadeem, M.A.; Khan, M.A.; Ziani, A.A.; Idriss, H. An overview of the photocatalytic water splitting over suspended particles.
Catalysts 2021, 11, 60. [CrossRef]
8. Varadhan, P.; Fu, H.-C.; Kao, Y.-C.; Horng, R.-H.; He, J.-H. An efficient and stable photoelectrochemical system with 9%
solar-to-hydrogen conversion efficiency via InGaP/GaAs double junction. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 5282. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
9. Fernández-Climent, R.; Giménez, S.; García-Tecedor, M. The role of oxygen vacancies in water splitting photoanodes. Sustain.
Energy Fuels 2020, 4, 5916–5926. [CrossRef]
Processes 2021, 9, 1959 22 of 26
10. Elbakkay, M.H.; El Rouby, W.M.A.; El-Dek, S.I.; Farghali, A.A. S-TiO2 /S-reduced graphene oxide for enhanced photoelectrochem-
ical water splitting. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 439, 1088–1102. [CrossRef]
11. Jian, J.; Sun, J. A review of recent progress on silicon carbide for photoelectrochemical water splitting. Solar RRL 2020, 4,
2000111. [CrossRef]
12. Zheng, G.; Wang, J.; Liu, H.; Murugadoss, V.; Zu, G.; Che, H.; Lai, C.; Li, H.; Ding, T.; Gao, Q.; et al. Tungsten oxide nanostructures
and nanocomposites for photoelectrochemical water splitting. Nanoscale 2019, 11, 18968–18994. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
13. Jin, S. What else can photoelectrochemical solar energy conversion do besides water splitting and CO2 reduction? ACS Energy
Lett. 2018, 3, 2610–2612. [CrossRef]
14. Wang, S.; Lu, A.; Zhong, C.-J. Hydrogen production from water electrolysis: Role of catalysts. Nano Converg. 2021, 8, 4.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
15. Ke, J.; He, F.; Wu, H.; Lyu, S.; Liu, J.; Yang, B.; Li, Z.; Zhang, Q.; Chen, J.; Lei, L.; et al. Nanocarbon-enhanced 2D photoelectrodes:
A new paradigm in photoelectrochemical water splitting. Nanomicro Lett. 2020, 13, 24. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
16. Niu, F.; Wang, D.; Li, F.; Liu, Y.; Shen, S.; Meyer, T.J. Hybrid photoelectrochemical water splitting systems: From interface design
to system assembly. Adv. Energy Mater. 2020, 10, 1900399. [CrossRef]
17. Ye, K.-H.; Li, H.; Huang, D.; Xiao, S.; Qiu, W.; Li, M.; Hu, Y.; Mai, W.; Ji, H.; Yang, S. Enhancing photoelectrochemical water
splitting by combining work function tuning and heterojunction engineering. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 3687. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
18. Ali, M.; Pervaiz, E.; Noor, T.; Rabi, O.; Zahra, R.; Yang, M. Recent advancements in MOF-based catalysts for applications in
electrochemical and photoelectrochemical water splitting: A review. Int. J. Energy Res. 2021, 45, 1190–1226. [CrossRef]
19. Tan, H.L.; Abdi, F.F.; Ng, Y.H. Heterogeneous photocatalysts: An overview of classic and modern approaches for optical,
electronic, and charge dynamics evaluation. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019, 48, 1255–1271. [CrossRef]
20. Franchi, D.; Amara, Z. Applications of sensitized semiconductors as heterogeneous visible-light photocatalysts in organic
synthesis. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 15405–15429. [CrossRef]
21. Arunachalam, P.; Nagai, K.; Amer, M.S.; Ghanem, M.A.; Ramalingam, R.J.; Al-Mayouf, A.M. Recent developments in the use of
heterogeneous semiconductor photocatalyst based materials for a visible-light-induced water-splitting system—A brief review.
Catalysts 2021, 11, 160. [CrossRef]
22. Tang, P.; Arbiol, J. Engineering surface states of hematite based photoanodes for boosting photoelectrochemical water splitting.
Nanoscale Horiz. 2019, 4, 1256–1276. [CrossRef]
23. Wu, Y.; Bi, L. Research progress on catalytic water splitting based on polyoxometalate/semiconductor composites. Catalysts 2021,
11, 524. [CrossRef]
24. Ng, B.-J.; Putri, L.K.; Kong, X.Y.; Teh, Y.W.; Pasbakhsh, P.; Chai, S.-P. Z-scheme photocatalytic systems for solar water splitting.
Adv. Sci. 2020, 7, 1903171. [CrossRef]
25. Zou, X.; Sun, Z.; Hu, Y.H. g-C3 N4 -based photoelectrodes for photoelectrochemical water splitting: A review. J. Mater. Chem. A
2020, 8, 21474–21502. [CrossRef]
26. Daulbayev, C.; Sultanov, F.; Bakbolat, B.; Daulbayev, O. 0D, 1D and 2D nanomaterials for visible photoelectrochemical water
splitting-A Review. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2020, 45, 33325–33342. [CrossRef]
27. Mishra, A.; Mehta, A.; Basu, S.; Shetti, N.P.; Reddy, K.R.; Aminabhavi, T.M. Graphitic carbon nitride (g–C3N4)–based metal-free
photocatalysts for water splitting: A review. Carbon 2019, 149, 693–721. [CrossRef]
28. Safaei, J.; Mohamed, N.A.; Mohamad Noh, M.F.; Soh, M.F.; Ludin, N.A.; Ibrahim, M.A.; Roslam Wan Isahak, W.N.; Mat Teridi,
M.A. Graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3 N4 ) electrodes for energy conversion and storage: A review on photoelectrochemical water
splitting, solar cells and supercapacitors. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 22346–22380. [CrossRef]
29. Wang, L.; Si, W.; Tong, Y.; Hou, F.; Pergolesi, D.; Hou, J.; Lippert, T.; Dou, S.X.; Liang, J. Graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3 N4 )-based
nanosized heteroarrays: Promising materials for photoelectrochemical water splitting. Carbon Energy 2020, 2, 223–250. [CrossRef]
30. Wang, S.; Zhang, J.; Li, B.; Sun, H.; Wang, S. Engineered graphitic carbon nitride-based photocatalysts for visible-light-driven
water splitting: A review. Energy Fuel 2021, 35, 6504–6526. [CrossRef]
31. Kumar, D.; Sharma, S.; Khare, N. Enhanced photoelectrochemical performance of NaNbO3 nanofiber photoanodes coupled with
visible light active g-C3 N4 nanosheets for water splitting. Nanotechnology 2020, 31, 135402. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
32. Acharya, R.; Parida, K. A review on TiO2 /g-C3 N4 visible-light-responsive photocatalysts for sustainable energy generation and
environmental remediation. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 103896. [CrossRef]
33. Asadzadeh-Khaneghah, S.; Habibi-Yangjeh, A. g-C3 N4 /carbon dot-based nanocomposites serve as efficacious photocatalysts for
environmental purification and energy generation: A review. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 276, 124319. [CrossRef]
34. Ong, W.-J.; Tan, L.-L.; Ng, Y.H.; Yong, S.-T.; Chai, S.-P. Graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3 N4 )-based photocatalysts for artificial
photosynthesis and environmental remediation: Are we a step closer to achieving sustainability? Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 7159–7329.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
35. Ren, Y.; Zeng, D.; Ong, W.-J. Interfacial engineering of graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3 N4 )-based metal sulfide heterojunction
photocatalysts for energy conversion: A review. Chin. J. Catal. 2019, 40, 289–319. [CrossRef]
36. Kumar, P.; Boukherroub, R.; Shankar, K. Sunlight-driven water-splitting using two-dimensional carbon based semiconductors. J.
Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 12876–12931. [CrossRef]
37. Reddy, A.S.; Kim, J. An efficient g-C3 N4 -decorated CdS-nanoparticle-doped Fe3 O4 hybrid catalyst for an enhanced H2 evolution
through photoelectrochemical water splitting. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 513, 145836. [CrossRef]
Processes 2021, 9, 1959 23 of 26
38. Ong, W.-J. 2D/2D graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3 N4 ) heterojunction nanocomposites for photocatalysis: Why does face-to-face
interface matter? Front. Mater. 2017, 4, 11. [CrossRef]
39. Zhu, B.; Zhang, L.; Cheng, B.; Yu, J. First-principle calculation study of tri-s-triazine-based g-C3 N4 : A review. Appl. Catal. B 2018,
224, 983–999. [CrossRef]
40. Hosseini H., S.M.; Siavash Moakhar, R.; Soleimani, F.; Sadrnezhaad, S.K.; Masudy-Panah, S.; Katal, R.; Seza, A.; Ghane, N.;
Ramakrishna, S. One-pot microwave synthesis of hierarchical C-doped CuO dandelions/g-C3 N4 nanocomposite with enhanced
photostability for photoelectrochemical water splitting. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 530, 147271. [CrossRef]
41. Ismael, M. A review on graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3 N4 ) based nanocomposites: Synthesis, categories, and their application in
photocatalysis. J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 846, 156446. [CrossRef]
42. Tamirat, A.G.; Rick, J.; Dubale, A.A.; Su, W.-N.; Hwang, B.-J. Using hematite for photoelectrochemical water splitting: A review
of current progress and challenges. Nanoscale Horiz. 2016, 1, 243–267. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
43. Wang, F.; Li, Q.; Xu, D. Recent progress in semiconductor-based nanocomposite photocatalysts for solar-to-chemical energy
conversion. Adv. Energy Mater. 2017, 7, 1700529. [CrossRef]
44. Lui, Y.H.; Zhang, B.; Hu, S. Rational design of photoelectrodes for photoelectrochemical water splitting and CO2 reduction. Front.
Phys. 2019, 14, 53402. [CrossRef]
45. Chen, S.; Huang, D.; Xu, P.; Xue, W.; Lei, L.; Cheng, M.; Wang, R.; Liu, X.; Deng, R. Semiconductor-based photocatalysts
for photocatalytic and photoelectrochemical water splitting: Will we stop with photocorrosion? J. Mater. Chem. A 2020, 8,
2286–2322. [CrossRef]
46. Sumesh, C.K.; Peter, S.C. Two-dimensional semiconductor transition metal based chalcogenide based heterostructures for water
splitting applications. Dalton Trans. 2019, 48, 12772–12802. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
47. Serpone, N.; Emeline, A.V.; Ryabchuk, V.K.; Kuznetsov, V.N.; Artem’ev, Y.M.; Horikoshi, S. Why do hydrogen and oxygen yields
from semiconductor-based photocatalyzed water splitting remain disappointingly low? Intrinsic and extrinsic factors impacting
surface redox reactions. ACS Energy Lett. 2016, 1, 931–948. [CrossRef]
48. Gupta, N.M. Factors affecting the efficiency of a water splitting photocatalyst: A perspective. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 71,
585–601. [CrossRef]
49. Mahzoon, S.; Nowee, S.M.; Haghighi, M. Synergetic combination of 1D-2D g-C3 N4 heterojunction nanophotocatalyst for hydrogen
production via water splitting under visible light irradiation. Renew. Energy 2018, 127, 433–443. [CrossRef]
50. Wang, H.; Li, X.; Yang, J. The g-C3 N4 /C2 N nanocomposite: A g-C3 N4 -based water-splitting photocatalyst with enhanced energy
efficiency. ChemPhysChem 2016, 17, 2100–2104. [CrossRef]
51. Yang, X.; Singh, D.; Ahuja, R. Recent advancements and future prospects in ultrathin 2D semiconductor-based photocatalysts for
water splitting. Catalysts 2020, 10, 1111. [CrossRef]
52. Yousefzadeh, S.; Fathi, B. Construction of carbon nanotube-g-C3 N4 nanocomposite photoanode for the enhanced photoelectro-
chemical activity in water splitting. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2020, 878, 114580. [CrossRef]
53. Patnaik, S.; Sahoo, D.P.; Parida, K. An overview on Ag modified g-C3 N4 based nanostructured materials for energy and
environmental applications. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 82, 1297–1312. [CrossRef]
54. Sepahvand, H.; Sharifnia, S. Photocatalytic overall water splitting by Z-scheme g-C3 N4 /BiFeO3 heterojunction. Int. J. Hydrogen
Energy 2019, 44, 23658–23668. [CrossRef]
55. Yang, Y.; Wang, S.; Li, Y.; Wang, J.; Wang, L. Strategies for efficient solar water splitting using carbon nitride. Chem. Asian J. 2017,
12, 1421–1434. [CrossRef]
56. Gandamalla, A.; Manchala, S.; Anand, P.; Fu, Y.-P.; Shanker, V. Development of versatile CdMoO4 /g-C3 N4 nanocomposite for
enhanced photoelectrochemical oxygen evolution reaction and photocatalytic dye degradation applications. Mat. Today Chem.
2021, 19, 100392. [CrossRef]
57. Paul, A.M.; Sajeev, A.; Nivetha, R.; Gothandapani, K.; Bhardwaj, P.; Govardhan, K.; Raghavan, V.; Jacob, G.; Sellapan, R.; Jeong,
S.K.; et al. Cuprous oxide (Cu2 O)/graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3 N4 ) nanocomposites for electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution
reaction. Diam. Relat. Mater. 2020, 107, 107899. [CrossRef]
58. Fu, J.; Yu, J.; Jiang, C.; Cheng, B. g-C3 N4 -based heterostructured photocatalysts. Adv. Energy Mater. 2018, 8, 1701503. [CrossRef]
59. Zhang, L.; Zhang, M.; Song, X.; Wang, H.; Bian, Z. One-step synthesis of MnOx/g-C3 N4 nanocomposites for enhancing the
visible light photoelectrochemical oxidation performance. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 399, 125825. [CrossRef]
60. Wang, J.; Yang, Z.; Gao, X.; Yao, W.; Wei, W.; Chen, X.; Zong, R.; Zhu, Y. Core-shell g-C3 N4 @ZnO composites as photoanodes with
double synergistic effects for enhanced visible-light photoelectrocatalytic activities. Appl. Catal. B 2017, 217, 169–180. [CrossRef]
61. Xiao, L.; Liu, T.; Zhang, M.; Li, Q.; Yang, J. Interfacial construction of zero-dimensional/one-dimensional g-C3 N4
nanoparticles/TiO2 nanotube arrays with Z-scheme heterostructure for improved photoelectrochemical water splitting.
ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 2483–2491. [CrossRef]
62. Reddy, C.V.; Koutavarapu, R.; Reddy, I.N.; Shim, J. Effect of a novel one-dimensional zinc tungsten oxide nanorods anchored
two-dimensional graphitic carbon nitride nanosheets for improved solar-light-driven photocatalytic removal of toxic pollutants
and photoelectrochemical water splitting. J. Mat. Sci. Mat. El. 2021, 32, 33–46. [CrossRef]
63. Seza, A.; Soleimani, F.; Naseri, N.; Soltaninejad, M.; Montazeri, S.M.; Sadrnezhaad, S.K.; Mohammadi, M.R.; Moghadam,
H.A.; Forouzandeh, M.; Amin, M.H. Novel microwave-assisted synthesis of porous g-C3 N4 /SnO2 nanocomposite for solar
water-splitting. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 440, 153–161. [CrossRef]
Processes 2021, 9, 1959 24 of 26
64. Bakr, A.E.A.; El Rouby, W.M.A.; Khan, M.D.; Farghali, A.A.; Xulu, B.; Revaprasadu, N. Synthesis and characterization of
Z-scheme α-Fe2 O3 NTs/ruptured tubular g-C3 N4 for enhanced photoelectrochemical water oxidation. Sol. Energy 2019, 193,
403–412. [CrossRef]
65. Alam, K.M.; Kumar, P.; Kar, P.; Thakur, U.K.; Zeng, S.; Cui, K.; Shankar, K. Enhanced charge separation in g-C3 N4 –BiOI
heterostructures for visible light driven photoelectrochemical water splitting. Nanoscale Adv. 2019, 1, 1460–1471. [CrossRef]
66. Liu, C.; Wang, F.; Zhang, J.; Wang, K.; Qiu, Y.; Liang, Q.; Chen, Z. Efficient photoelectrochemical water splitting by g-C3 N4 /TiO2
nanotube array heterostructures. Nanomicro Lett. 2018, 10, 37. [CrossRef]
67. Liu, Y.; Yu, Y.-X.; Zhang, W.-D. Photoelectrochemical study on charge transfer properties of nanostructured Fe2 O3 modified by
g-C3 N4 . Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2014, 39, 9105–9113. [CrossRef]
68. Lei, N.; Li, J.; Song, Q.; Liang, Z. Construction of g-C3 N4 /BCN two-dimensional heterojunction photoanode for enhanced
photoelectrochemical water splitting. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2019, 44, 10498–10507. [CrossRef]
69. Murugan, C.; Bhojanaa, K.B.; Ong, W.-J.; Jothivenkatachalam, K.; Pandikumar, A. Improving hole mobility with the heterojunction
of graphitic carbon nitride and titanium dioxide via soft template process in photoelectrocatalytic water splitting. Int. J. Hydrogen
Energy 2019, 44, 30885–30898. [CrossRef]
70. Murugan, C.; Karnan, M.; Sathish, M.; Pandikumar, A. Construction of heterostructure based on hierarchical Bi2 MoO6 and
g-C3 N4 with ease for impressive performance in photoelectrocatalytic water splitting and supercapacitor. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2020,
10, 2427–2442. [CrossRef]
71. Mohammad, A.; Khan, M.E.; Karim, M.R.; Cho, M.H. Synergistically effective and highly visible light responsive SnO2 -g-C3 N4
nanostructures for improved photocatalytic and photoelectrochemical performance. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 495, 143432. [CrossRef]
72. Hao, H.; Lu, D.; Wang, Q. Photoelectrochemical study on charge separation mechanisms of Bi2 WO6 quantum dots decorated
g-C3 N4 . Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2018, 43, 8824–8834. [CrossRef]
73. Mahala, C.; Sharma, M.D.; Basu, M. ZnO nanosheets decorated with graphite-like carbon nitride quantum dots as photoanodes
in photoelectrochemical water splitting. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2020, 3, 1999–2007. [CrossRef]
74. Ma, X.; Zhang, J.; Wang, B.; Li, Q.; Chu, S. Hierarchical Cu2 O foam/g-C3 N4 photocathode for photoelectrochemical hydrogen
production. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 427, 907–916. [CrossRef]
75. Liu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Li, X.; Yao, Z.; Zhou, L.; Sun, H.; Wang, S. Graphitic carbon nitride decorated with CoP nanocrystals for
enhanced photocatalytic and photoelectrochemical H2 evolution. Energy Fuel 2019, 33, 11663–11676. [CrossRef]
76. Murugan, C.; Abinav Nataraj, R.; Praveen Kumar, M.; Ravichandran, S.; Pandikumar, A. Enhanced charge transfer process of
bismuth vanadate interleaved graphitic carbon nitride nanohybrids in mediator-free direct Z-scheme photoelectrocatalytic water
splitting. Chem. Sel. 2019, 4, 4653–4663. [CrossRef]
77. Wang, R.; Yan, J.; Zu, M.; Yang, S.; Cai, X.; Gao, Q.; Fang, Y.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, S. Facile synthesis of interlocking g-C3 N4 /CdS
photoanode for stable photoelectrochemical hydrogen production. Electrochim. Acta 2018, 279, 74–83. [CrossRef]
78. Miao, H.; Zhang, G.; Hu, X.; Mu, J.; Han, T.; Fan, J.; Zhu, C.; Song, L.; Bai, J.; Hou, X. A novel strategy to prepare 2D g-C3 N4
nanosheets and their photoelectrochemical properties. J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 690, 669–676. [CrossRef]
79. Bian, H.; Wang, A.; Li, Z.; Li, Z.; Diao, Y.; Lu, J.; Li, Y.Y. g-C3 N4 -modified water-crystallized mesoporous SnO2 for enhanced
photoelectrochemical properties. Part. Part. Syst. Charact. 2018, 35, 1800155. [CrossRef]
80. Jiang, T.; Nan, F.; Zhou, J.; Zheng, F.; Weng, Y.; Cai, T.-Y.; Ju, S.; Xu, B.; Fang, L. Enhanced photocatalytic and photoelectro-
chemical performance of g-C3 N4 /BiVO4 heterojunction: A combined experimental and theoretical study. AIP Adv. 2019, 9,
055225. [CrossRef]
81. Sariket, D.; Ray, D.; Baduri, S.; Ghosh, S.; Maity, A.; Bhattacharya, C. Synthesis of g-C3 N4 /InVO4 semiconductor for improved
photocatalytic and photoelectrochemical applications. Electroanalysis 2020, 32, 2535–2544. [CrossRef]
82. Kokane, S.B.; Sasikala, R.; Phase, D.M.; Sartale, S.D. In2 S3 nanoparticles dispersed on g-C3 N4 nanosheets: Role of hetero-
junctions in photo-induced charge transfer and photoelectrochemical and photocatalytic performance. J. Mater. Sci. 2017, 52,
7077–7090. [CrossRef]
83. Zhang, S.; Yan, J.; Yang, S.; Xu, Y.; Cai, X.; Li, X.; Zhang, X.; Peng, F.; Fang, Y. Electrodeposition of Cu2 O/g-C3 N4 heterojunction film
on an FTO substrate for enhancing visible light photoelectrochemical water splitting. Chin. J. Catal. 2017, 38, 365–371. [CrossRef]
84. Wu, F.; Ma, Y.; Hu, Y.H. Near infrared light-driven photoelectrocatalytic water splitting over P-doped g-C3 N4 . ACS Appl. Energy
Mater. 2020, 3, 11223–11230. [CrossRef]
85. Safaei, J.; Ullah, H.; Mohamed, N.A.; Mohamad Noh, M.F.; Soh, M.F.; Tahir, A.A.; Ahmad Ludin, N.; Ibrahim, M.A.; Wan Isahak,
W.N.R.; Mat Teridi, M.A. Enhanced photoelectrochemical performance of Z-scheme g-C3 N4 /BiVO4 photocatalyst. Appl. Catal. B
2018, 234, 296–310. [CrossRef]
86. Ragupathi, V.; Raja, M.A.; Panigrahi, P.; Ganapathi Subramaniam, N. CuO/g-C3 N4 nanocomposite as promising photocatalyst
for photoelectrochemical water splitting. Optik 2020, 208, 164569. [CrossRef]
87. Xiaoyi, H.; Xiangkang, Z.; Yue, L.; Jun, L.; Shi, Y.; Yichun, Y.; Jian, H.; David, T.M.; Xiwang, Z. Nano-layer based 1T-rich
MoS2 /g-C3 N4 co-catalyst system for enhanced photocatalytic and photoelectrochemical activity. Appl. Catal. B 2020, 268, 118466.
88. Guru, S.; Kumar, S.; Bellamkonda, S.; Gangavarapu, R.R. Synthesis of CuTi-LDH supported on g-C3 N4 for electrochemical and
photoelectrochemical oxygen evolution reactions. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2021, 46, 16414–16430. [CrossRef]
89. Guigoz, V.; Balan, L.; Aboulaich, A.; Schneider, R.; Gries, T. Heterostructured thin LaFeO3 /g-C3 N4 films for efficient photoelectro-
chemical hydrogen evolution. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2020, 45, 17468–17479. [CrossRef]
Processes 2021, 9, 1959 25 of 26
90. Chen, Z.; Ma, G.; Chen, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Gao, J.; Meng, Q.; Yuan, M.; Wang, X.; Liu, J.-M.; et al. Fabrication and
photoelectrochemical properties of silicon nanowires/g-C3 N4 core/shell arrays. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 396, 609–615. [CrossRef]
91. Babu, B.; Shim, J.; Yoo, K. Efficient solar-light-driven photoelectrochemical water oxidation of one-step in-situ synthesized
Co-doped g-C3 N4 nanolayers. Ceram. Int. 2020, 46, 16422–16430. [CrossRef]
92. Arif, M.; Yasin, G.; Shakeel, M.; Mushtaq, M.A.; Ye, W.; Fang, X.; Ji, S.; Yan, D. Hierarchical CoFe-layered double hydroxide and
g-C3 N4 heterostructures with enhanced bifunctional photo/electrocatalytic activity towards overall water splitting. Mater. Chem.
Front. 2019, 3, 520–531. [CrossRef]
93. Fang, Y.; Huang, W.; Yang, S.; Zhou, X.; Ge, C.; Gao, Q.; Fang, Y.; Zhang, S. Facile synthesis of anatase/rutile TiO2 /g-C3 N4
multi-heterostructure for efficient photocatalytic overall water splitting. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2020, 45, 17378–17387. [CrossRef]
94. Bhandary, N.; Singh, A.P.; Kumar, S.; Ingole, P.P.; Thakur, G.S.; Ganguli, A.K.; Basu, S. In-situ solid-state synthesis of a
AgNi/g-C3 N4 nanocomposite for enhanced photoelectrochemical and photocatalytic activity. ChemSusChem 2016, 9, 2816–2823.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
95. Liu, W.; Shen, J.; Yang, X.; Liu, Q.; Tang, H. Dual Z-scheme g-C3 N4 /Ag3 PO4 /Ag2 MoO4 ternary composite photocatalyst for solar
oxygen evolution from water splitting. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 456, 369–378. [CrossRef]
96. Babu, B.; Koutavarapu, R.; Shim, J.; Yoo, K. Enhanced visible-light-driven photoelectrochemical and photocatalytic performance
of Au-SnO2 quantum dot-anchored g-C3 N4 nanosheets. Sep. Pur. Technol. 2020, 240, 116652. [CrossRef]
97. Li, J.; Yuan, H.; Zhu, Z. Improved photoelectrochemical performance of Z-scheme g-C3 N4 /Bi2 O3 /BiPO4 heterostructure and
degradation property. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2016, 385, 34–41. [CrossRef]
98. Chaudhary, D.; Kumar, S.; Khare, N. Boosting the visible-light photoelectrochemical performance of C3 N4 by coupling with TiO2
and carbon nanotubes: An organic/inorganic hybrid photocatalyst nanocomposite for photoelectrochemical water spitting. Int. J.
Hydrogen Energy 2020, 45, 30091–30100. [CrossRef]
99. Si, H.; Deng, Q.; Yin, C.; Tavakoli, M.M.; Zhang, J.; Kong, J. Graphdiyne coupled with g-C3 N4 /NiFe-layered double hydroxide, a
layered nanohybrid for highly efficient photoelectrochemical water oxidation. Adv. Mater. Inter. 2020, 7, 1902083. [CrossRef]
100. Gopalakrishnan, S.; Bhalerao, G.M.; Jeganathan, K. SrTiO3 NPs/g-C3 N4 NSs coupled Si NWs based hybrid photocathode for
visible light driven photoelectrochemical water reduction. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 13911–13919. [CrossRef]
101. Alam, K.M.; Kumar, P.; Kar, P.; Goswami, A.; Thakur, U.K.; Zeng, S.; Vahidzadeh, E.; Cui, K.; Shankar, K. Heterojunc-
tions of halogen-doped carbon nitride nanosheets and BiOI for sunlight-driven water-splitting. Nanotechnology 2019, 31,
084001. [CrossRef]
102. Wu, Y.; Song, M.; Chai, Z.; Wang, X. Assembling Bi2 MoO6 /Ru/g-C3 N4 for highly effective oxygen generation from water
splitting under visible-light irradiation. Inorg. Chem. 2019, 58, 7374–7384. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
103. Patnaik, S.; Swain, G.; Parida, K.M. Highly efficient charge transfer through a double Z-scheme mechanism by a Cu-promoted
MoO3 /g-C3 N4 hybrid nanocomposite with superior electrochemical and photocatalytic performance. Nanoscale 2018, 10, 5950–
5964. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
104. Wen, P.; Sun, Y.; Li, H.; Liang, Z.; Wu, H.; Zhang, J.; Zeng, H.; Geyer, S.M.; Jiang, L. A highly active three-dimensional Z-scheme
ZnO/Au/g-C3 N4 photocathode for efficient photoelectrochemical water splitting. Appl. Catal. B 2020, 263, 118180. [CrossRef]
105. Xiao, J.; Zhang, X.; Li, Y. A ternary g-C3 N4 /Pt/ZnO photoanode for efficient photoelectrochemical water splitting. Int. J. Hydrogen
Energy 2015, 40, 9080–9087. [CrossRef]
106. Liu, Y.; Su, F.-Y.; Yu, Y.-X.; Zhang, W.-D. Nano g-C3 N4 modified Ti-Fe2 O3 vertically arrays for efficient photoelectrochemical
generation of hydrogen under visible light. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2016, 41, 7270–7279. [CrossRef]
107. Shanker, G.S.; Bhosale, R.; Ogale, S.; Nag, A. 2D nanocomposite of g-C3 N4 and TiN embedded N-doped graphene for photoelec-
trochemical reduction of water using sunlight. Adv. Mater. Inter. 2018, 5, 1801488. [CrossRef]
108. Li, Y.; Wang, R.; Li, H.; Wei, X.; Feng, J.; Liu, K.; Dang, Y.; Zhou, A. Efficient and stable photoelectrochemical seawater splitting
with TiO2 @g-C3 N4 nanorod arrays decorated by Co-Pi. J. Phys. Chem. C 2015, 119, 20283–20292. [CrossRef]
109. Mahvelati-Shamsabadi, T.; Goharshadi, E.K.; Karimi-Nazarabad, M. Z-scheme design of Ag@g-C3 N4 /ZnS photoanode device for
efficient solar water oxidation: An organic-inorganic electronic interface. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2019, 4, 13085–13097. [CrossRef]
110. Kumar, P.; Thakur, U.K.; Alam, K.; Kar, P.; Kisslinger, R.; Zeng, S.; Patel, S.; Shankar, K. Arrays of TiO2 nanorods embed-
ded with fluorine doped carbon nitride quantum dots (CNFQDs) for visible light driven water splitting. Carbon 2018, 137,
174–187. [CrossRef]
111. Li, K.; Huang, Z.; Zeng, X.; Huang, B.; Gao, S.; Lu, J. Synergetic effect of Ti3+ and oxygen doping on enhancing photoelec-
trochemical and photocatalytic properties of TiO2 /g-C3 N4 heterojunctions. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 2017, 9, 11577–11586.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
112. Yu, Z.; Li, Y.; Qu, J.; Zheng, R.; Cairney, J.M.; Zhang, J.; Zhu, M.; Khan, A.; Li, W. Enhanced photoelectrochemical water-splitting
performance with a hierarchical heterostructure: Co3 O4 nanodots anchored TiO2 @P-C3 N4 core-shell nanorod arrays. Chem. Eng.
J. 2021, 404, 126458. [CrossRef]
113. Nayak, S.; Parida, K.M. Deciphering Z-scheme charge transfer dynamics in heterostructure NiFe-LDH/N-rGO/g-C3 N4 nanocom-
posite for photocatalytic pollutant removal and water splitting reactions. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 2458. [CrossRef]
114. Naseer, I.; Adeel, A.; Ibrahim, K.; Muhammad, S.K.; Ahsanulhaq, Q. Molybdenum impregnated g-C3N4 nanotubes as potentially
active photocatalyst for renewable energy applications. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 16886.
Processes 2021, 9, 1959 26 of 26
115. Guangqing, L.; Mengwei, X.; Qinpu, L.; Hui, Y.; Yuming, Z. Facile synthesis of C-doped hollow spherical g-C3 N4 from
supramolecular self-assembly for enhanced photoredox water splitting. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2019, 44, 25671–25679.
116. Ahmed, E.A.A.; Waleed, M.A.E.R.; Malik, D.K.; Ahmed, A.F.; Neerish, R. ZnCr-CO3 LDH/ruptured tubular g-C3 N4 composite
with increased specific surface area for enhanced photoelectrochemical water splitting. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 508, 145100.
117. Fazal, R.; Muhammad, H.; Asad, A.; Tingting, W.; Abbas, K.; Qiuyun, F.; Wei, L.; Heping, Z.; Zhiping, Z.; Bilawal, K.; et al.
Synthesis of S-Doped porous g-C3 N4 by using ionic liquids and subsequently coupled with Au-TiO2 for exceptional cocatalyst-free
visible-light catalytic activities. Appl. Catal. B 2018, 237, 1082–1090.