Ielts Writing Part 2
Ielts Writing Part 2
E.g. Question: To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Outline:
Introduction
Paraphrase the statement.
State your opinion (agree or disagree) clearly.
Outline the main points that will be discussed.
Body Paragraph 1
Topic Sentence: Importance of education for economic development.
Supporting Detail 1: Educated workforce drives innovation and productivity.
Example: High literacy rates in developed countries like Japan and Germany.
Supporting Detail 2: Education fosters entrepreneurship and new businesses.
Body Paragraph 2
Topic Sentence: Education promotes social development and equality.
Supporting Detail 1: Reduces poverty by providing better job opportunities.
Example: Higher employment rates among educated individuals.
Supporting Detail 2: Encourages social mobility and reduces inequality.
Body Paragraph 3
Topic Sentence: Education contributes to political stability and good governance.
Supporting Detail 1: Educated citizens are more informed and active in politics.
Example: Higher voter turnout in countries with better education systems.
Supporting Detail 2: Leads to the election of competent leaders and effective policies.
Conclusion
Summarize the main points.
Restate your opinion.
Provide a final thought or recommendation
In IELTS Writing Part 2, test takers are required to write an essay in response to a point of
view, argument, or problem. There are several types of questions that can be asked in this
section. Understanding the different types of questions can help students prepare more
effectively. Here are the main types of IELTS Writing Part 2 questions:
6. Mixed Questions
These questions combine elements of the other types, asking you to provide your opinion,
discuss advantages/disadvantages, or identify problems and solutions within one prompt.
Example Questions:
Some people believe that the government should provide free healthcare for all its citizens.
Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this policy and give your own opinion.
Some people think that international tourism creates tension rather than understanding
between people from different cultures. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
In today's world, the development of a country is often gauged by various factors, such as
economic growth, technological advancements, and education. While there are many elements
that contribute to a nation's progress, I strongly believe that education is the most important
factor.
Firstly, education provides individuals with the knowledge and skills necessary to contribute
to the economy. An educated workforce is essential for industries to innovate and compete on
a global scale. For instance, countries with high literacy rates, such as Japan and Germany,
have thriving economies and advanced technologies.
Secondly, education promotes social development and equality. By ensuring that all citizens
have access to quality education, a country can reduce poverty and close the income gap.
Educated individuals are more likely to be aware of their rights and responsibilities, leading to
a more just and equitable society.
Furthermore, education fosters political stability and good governance. Educated citizens are
better equipped to make informed decisions and participate in the democratic process. This
leads to the election of competent leaders who can implement effective policies for national
development.
In conclusion, while economic and technological factors are important, education remains the
cornerstone of a country's development. It empowers individuals, promotes social equality,
and fosters political stability, making it the most critical factor in the progress of a nation.
Road safety is a significant concern worldwide, and various measures have been
proposed to address this issue. One such measure is to increase the minimum legal age for
driving cars or riding motorbikes. While some people believe this approach will enhance road
safety, others argue that it may not be effective.
Proponents of increasing the legal driving age argue that young drivers lack the
maturity and experience needed to operate vehicles safely. Statistics show that younger
drivers are more likely to be involved in accidents due to risky behaviors such as speeding
and distracted driving. By raising the legal age, it is believed that drivers will have more time
to develop the necessary skills and judgment required for safe driving.
On the other hand, opponents of this measure contend that age is not the primary
factor influencing road safety. They argue that comprehensive driver education and stricter
enforcement of traffic laws are more effective solutions. For instance, countries with robust
driver training programs and rigorous testing have lower accident rates, regardless of the legal
driving age. Additionally, improving road infrastructure and promoting public transportation
can reduce the reliance on private vehicles and enhance overall safety.
In my opinion, while increasing the legal driving age may have some impact, it is not a
comprehensive solution. A multifaceted approach that includes better driver education, stricter
law enforcement, and improved infrastructure is more likely to yield significant and long-
lasting improvements in road safety.
In conclusion, both views have merit, but a holistic approach addressing various
aspects of road safety is essential for effectively reducing accidents and saving lives.
6. Mixed Questions
Question: Some people believe that the government should provide free healthcare for all its
citizens. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this policy and give your own opinion.
The debate over whether the government should provide free healthcare for all its
citizens is ongoing. This policy has its advantages and disadvantages, and it is essential to
consider both before forming an opinion.
One of the main advantages of free healthcare is that it ensures equal access to medical
services for everyone, regardless of their financial status. This can lead to a healthier
population, as individuals are more likely to seek medical attention without the fear of
incurring high costs. For example, in countries with free healthcare systems like the UK,
people are generally healthier due to the availability of preventative and early treatment
services.
Another advantage is the potential for increased economic productivity. When people
are healthy, they are more likely to work and contribute to the economy. This can reduce the
burden on social welfare systems and promote overall economic growth.
However, free healthcare also has its disadvantages. One significant drawback is the
high cost to the government. Funding a universal healthcare system requires substantial
financial resources, which may lead to higher taxes or cuts in other public services.
Additionally, there is the risk of long waiting times and reduced quality of care due to
increased demand and limited resources.
In my opinion, while free healthcare has its challenges, the benefits outweigh the
disadvantages. Ensuring that all citizens have access to medical services is a fundamental
aspect of a fair and just society. To address the potential downsides, governments can
implement measures such as efficient resource allocation and investments in healthcare
infrastructure to maintain quality and manage costs effectively.
In conclusion, providing free healthcare has significant advantages, including equal
access and economic benefits. Despite the challenges, it is a policy worth pursuing to promote
a healthier and more equitable society.