Sales Enablement Landscape Report 2023
Sales Enablement Landscape Report 2023
4 Key findings
69
The future of enablement
75
Conclusion
2
Introduction
Introduction
Welcome to 2023’s Sales Enablement Landscape Report!
Once again, we’re diving head first into the world of sales enablement. With the
help of 150 of our community members, we’ve created a report that examines every
aspect of the multifaceted role of sales enablement.
From team size and reporting structures, to the use of artificial intelligence and the
most impactful metrics, this report breaks down everything you need to know about
enablement and a glimpse into your peers’ experiences.
Our goal?
Key findings
In order to get the most out of the report, you’ll want to read it in its entirety and take
in the breadth and depth of content.
But if you’re pressed for time, here are some of our key findings and highlights:
The most common enablement team size was 2-4, with 33.8% of respondents in
that range. Solo practitioners closely followed at 31%.
77.7% are either optimistic or very optimistic about the growth of artificial
intelligence in the enablement space.
For all the details, turn the virtual page and read on.
B2C
2.7%
Consultancy
3.37
B2B
82.43%
B2B and B2C
11.49%
30.41%
63.51%
2.03%
2.03%
Asia
Australasia
Despite the sales world being traditionally male-dominated, and a 2018 LinkedIn report stating
that 39% of sales roles were held by females, among our 150 respondents the roles are reversed.
In fact, in our 2022 report female respondents made up 57% of respondents, so that percentage
has increased.
With diversity, equity, inclusion, and belonging becoming increasingly important in the workforce,
it’s good to see that enablement doesn’t appear to have the same barriers to entry as other roles, at
least among our respondents.
Likewise, it’s heartening to see that some respondents were comfortable enough to disclose their
non-binary identity. Gender identity should not be an obstacle to working in any business role,
enablement included.
Female
61.49%
Gender
Male identity
35.15%
Sales experience is a major talking point in the enablement space - do you need to have
worked in a sales or sales-adjacent role to be an effective enabler? The debate continues, and
analyzing our respondents’ backgrounds doesn’t provide any definitive answers.
66.22% worked in either a sales, sales management, or sales leadership role prior to working in
enablement. This leaves just over a third (33.78%) who’s previous role was not in a sales role.
Prior to working in enablement, which of the following best described your role?
Sales - 37.84%
Marketing - 6.76%
Other - 4.05%
Product - 3.38%
HR - 1.35%
Another of the enablement community’s big discussion points revolves around what
enablement is and what it should be. We’ll have more on that later in the report, but we
started by asking our respondents which of the following best described their role.
What began as sales enablement has evolved into revenue, GTM (go-to-market), and other
forms of enablement, supporting people across all areas of the business.
This evolution is visible among our responses. While sales enablement is still the single
biggest form of enablement (38.51%), our respondents in revenue, GTM, field, product, and
success enablement combined to form 52.03% - over half of responses.
38.51%
27.7%
16.22%
9.46%
3.38% 3.38%
1.35%
Our respondents’ answers provided an interesting look into the world of enablement job titles
too. There’s an incredible breadth of titles that fall under the enablement umbrella.
One fascinating takeaway was that 12.84% of our respondents had “sales” enablement in
their official job title, but said their role was best described as revenue or GTM enablement.
Does this disparity between job title and actual role, in over one-in-ten positions, cause
confusion among jobseekers and the enablement community? That’s for the enablement
community to decide.
Below is a selection of the variety of job titles that existed among our respondents:
Senior GTM Sales Enablement Manager Sales Excellence and Enablement Lead
It’s worth taking a moment to give some kudos to our respondents and enablers everywhere
for wearing so many hats.
Team size is something that naturally varies from organization to organization. Larger
ones will often have more enablers on board, but being a one-person band is a common
challenge in the space.
This is reflected in our respondents’ answers, where 64.79% answered stating that their team
was between one and four people in size.
33.8%
31%
17.61%
9.15%
2.82% 2.82%
1.41% 1.41%
Often more important than the amount of enablers in an organization is the enabler to rep
ratio. A solo practitioner is much more likely to effectively enable 25 reps than 250, of course.
We asked our respondents to select the ratio which was closest to their current operating
ratio, and the responses were interesting.
The “golden” ratio is often stated to be 1:50, and 69.72% (nearly 7 in 10!) are around that mark
or below it.
Additionally, the median ratio was 1 enabler to 50 reps, right on that golden ratio.
With enablement having a plethora of responsibilities and often wearing multiple hats within
an organization, the subject of where enablement should report to is often contentious.
When analyzing the reporting structures of our respondents, we can see some interesting
developments. Just over a third (34.51%) of our enablement professionals report to sales.
However, that leaves 65.49% of our enablement respondents who report to someone other
than sales, with RevOps and C-Suite being strong contenders.
34.51%
24.65%
20.42%
9.87%
5.93%
1.51% 1.51%
0.8% 0.8%
Diving into the results a little bit closer, we can see an interesting divide even just among
respondents who report directly to the C-Suite. Perhaps unsurprisingly, the Chief Revenue
Officer (CRO) dominates this data - but CROs aren’t the only C-suiters that enablement is
reporting to.
No
4.06%
Yes
62.16%
Partially, in
collaboration
with other teams
33.78%
No
16.72%
Yes
48.75%
Partially, in
collaboration
with other teams
34.53%
Enablement
12.82%
A combination
of some/all
62.91%
Marketing
14.15%
Product Marketing
10.12%
However, perhaps more surprising is that 83.11% of our enablers are involved in sales kick-offs,
with just under half saying they’re totally responsible.
This is close to as many enablers who design and create content in their organization (75.73%).
There’s a lot more to enablement than just whether you’re onboarding new reps or not, or
how involved you are in creating content. We wanted to ask our respondents about how
they collaborate with the other stakeholders in the organization.
31.69%
23.34%
22.64%
11.57%
9.16%
0.7% 0.7%
20.42%
18.31%
11.97%
9.86% 9.86% 9.15% 8.45% 8.16%
3.82%
Interestingly, here we see that product marketing (31.69%) is the most collaborated-with
function apart from sales, and less than one in ten (9.86%) voted it as the department
they wanted to have a better relationship with.
Perhaps that’s because product marketing and enablement tend to have a strong cross-
functional relationship?
On the other hand, one in five (20.42%) of our enablement respondents want a better
relationship with the product team, the most popular selection.
In the enablement space, charters are a bit like marmite. You either love ‘em or hate ‘em,
and this is very much reflected in our respondents’ views.
A charter is a guiding document, providing direction and focus to your enablement team,
while also acting as a file which you can direct any other department towards when they
have questions about what you actually do.
But do enablers actually use charters and do they think they’re effective?
No
Yes
39.65%
41.65%
Working on one
right now
18.61%
Other
7.38%
Not sure
14.74%
Yes
59.64%
No
18.24%
(Results excl. consultants) (“Other” answers incl. “They help focus the efforts of the enablement team,
but are largely considered irrelevant to everyone else in sales”, “When appropriately socialized”, “It's only
valuable if everyone sticks to it”).
The statistics from our respondents show a divide in opinion. Less than half (41.65%)
actually have an enablement charter at the moment, though that figure reaches 60.26%
when we include those still in the process of creating one.
This is far from unanimous adoption of charters. A similar divide was seen when we asked
our respondents whether they believed charters were effective.
Less than two-thirds (59.64%) said yes, while 32.98% were either unsure of their worth or
simply don’t see them as worth the time.
One of the most common complaints in the enablement space is that the role simply isn’t
valued enough by organizations. We wanted to judge the mood of our respondents both
towards their own company’s view of enablement, and on the function overall.
On a scale of 0 - 10, how much value do you think is placed on enablement at your
organization?
Reporting
to C-suite
7
Without a
charter
Avg.
5.9
6.35
6.47
Reporting
to RevOps
With a
6.45 Reporting
charter
6.88
to Sales
6.61
What really stands out is that the largest positive deviations from the average are found
in two distinct groups of respondents - those who report directly to the C-Suite, and those
who have an enablement charter.
Could those factors be the key to proving enablement’s value internally? It’s not
surprising that directly reporting to senior leadership in the C-level could help
enablement be seen and understood as a value driver.
What’s interesting about this result is that the majority of our respondents do have at
least some level of cross-functional support for their enablement efforts (82%),
which is heartwarming to see.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Avg.6.47/10 5.9
6.47
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
What’s fascinating about this statistic is that enablers are generally more positive about
how enablement is valued in their own organization compared to in the wider world.
While there’s no definitive answer, the enablement function has unfortunately seen a
number of layoffs in recent times which may affect our respondents’ wider perception of
how the function is valued.
To cap this section off, we provided our respondents with an open forum to share the
single biggest hurdle in the way of stakeholder support in their organization.
What is the biggest hurdle in the way of stakeholder support in your organization?
27.7%
18.92%
11.49%
9.46%
2.7%
Over a quarter (27.7%) of our respondents stated that their biggest challenges in regards
to stakeholder support came about as a result of competing priorities and a lack of
alignment or communication.
Perhaps unsurprisingly, the second most common roadblock to stakeholder support was
simply that the stakeholders don’t understand or value enablement enough.
Nearly one in five (18.92%) stated that it was the biggest roadblock, and there’s no doubt
that more than this number struggle with it.
“Stakeholders don't know what enablement is able to do. They have very low
expectations and that means low support and that we’re rarely invited in.”
“Enablement impacts are seen as too abstract, and therefore prioritized low”
With these two categories making up 46.62% of our respondents biggest roadblocks to
stakeholder support, it’s clear that there’s still work to do when it comes to educating
organizations on why enablement is impactful and why it should be prioritized.
Enablement metrics
and data
As we’ve seen in the previous sections, proving enablement’s value is often a difficult task.
One of the more reliable ways to do this is by using cold, hard data and metrics.
We asked our respondents both how they measure rep performance and enablement team
performance to understand what the enablement community views as key metrics.
We began by asking our respondents the top three metrics they used to measure their
sales reps’ performance.
While win/close rates were unsurprisingly the most popular data point, with 72.97% of
respondents putting it in their top three, there was plenty of disparity from the second
most popular answer onwards.
We look at the ability to use the sales methodology in calls and information
gathered. This is more qualitative than quantitative which makes it hard
to track.
There are more metrics I wish to track, but we do not have the technology in
place to accomplish that. (Things like content utilization, content impact to
win-rate. etc.)
Our CRM is set up for finance and not sales metrics, so it is difficult to track
impact on sales performance.
This is a constant challenge for a small sales team with a small data set. We
often find out data tells us different things from month to month, as the data
set isn't large enough to provide consistent information.
Knowing the metrics enablement teams use to benchmark their sales reps’ performance is
great, but it can be even more useful to know what challenges are stopping sales teams from
achieving top marks.
We asked our respondents to rank the top three challenges facing their sales teams, and
once again we had a single standout answer, with lots of variation below it.
Nearly two-thirds of our enablers’ sales teams are struggling to generate pipeline (65.54%).
A similar percentage are struggling to access sales content effectively, and also aren’t
spending enough time selling (25.68% & 22.97%), two issues which are possibly related.
What are the top three challenges facing your sales teams?
While rep performance is key, it’s arguably even more important to know how to measure
enablement’s own performance. We’ve seen already in this report that it’s a struggle for
many enablement professionals to prove their value, so knowing what metrics your peers are
using to measure their performance is very valuable.
We asked our respondents to select their top three metrics for measuring enablement
performance and incredibly, not one was used by more than half of enablers. 50% of our
respondents use content adoption to track their team’s performance, with 40.54% leaning
on win rate to do so. Interestingly, less than one in four (22.3%) regard employee NPS as a
top three metric. Almost 5% of the enablers who took our survey have no official metrics for
tracking enablement’s own performance. This could prove an issue for these teams going
forward.
With enablers striving to tie their initiatives to positive revenue outcomes to showcase value
to data-driven stakeholders, it’s unsurprising that the two most common themes were
metrics related to rep performance versus their KPIs, or overall revenue improvement (20.27%
& 14.19%).
NPS - 2.7%
The "why" metric, and that is any metric that shows why revenue is growing,
why a rep is getting stronger, or why collaboration is growing and collateral is
being produced faster, ultimately providing better visuals and information for
customers to help them make decisions faster.
Enablement does not control the success of the product, or the happiness of
our customers. So the most important thing to measure is the ability for the
sales team members to make their quota. (Note - ironically, enablement has
no control over quota numbers.... but sales reps will leave the organization, if
they don't believe that they can hit their numbers - so our job as enablers is to
help them hit their numbers!)
I don't think there is one metric. Enablement touches so many areas of the
GTM/revenue function that I have key metrics for each team. Eg. MQL-SQL
conversion, successful discovery calls booked, the time that deals spend in
certain deal stages reducing over time, improving comms with internal teams
like legal and opps.
Another debate in the enablement sphere surrounds qualitative and quantitative data. Is one
more important than the other, or is one more useful for stakeholders than the other?
It appears the answer, in the eyes of most enablers, is no. Seven in ten respondents (70.27%)
believe the two differing types of data are equally important to enablement.
Qualitative data
10.81%
Quantitative data
18.92%
It's not really an either/or choice but a combination. For example, in the
past I've had quantitative data to yellow-light an AE's low proposal to win-
rate. I then used qualitative data from account reviews, joint calls, sales
skills assessments, Gong recordings, etc. to understand why. We had one AE
closing 2 out of 10 proposals and another closing 2 out of 4. Qualitative data
revealed targeted training was needed for the former AE in how to fully qualify
a prospect on their initial calls, before doing all the work of a proposal.
For a team as small as ours and a sales cycle as long as ours, relying only on
objective measurements can lead to a false sense of accuracy. Just because
someone hasn't put data in Salesforce (arrgh!) doesn't mean they're not
working on it.
Quantitative data helps you capture the raw numbers, but the key is to dig
deep on the "why" behind the numbers.
Challenges facing
enablement teams
and departments
One of the wonderful things about enablement networks and communities like Sales
Enablement Collective is that enablers from across the globe can come together to share
common challenges and understand they’re not alone in facing certain roadblocks.
We wanted to better understand what the challenges facing enablement departments are.
By understanding the issues, we can band together as a community to solve them.
Other - 16.22%
What stands out is that the percentages are so high on these, meaning that many enablers
are facing the same issues, even across different organizations. Here’s what some of our
respondents had to say on the challenges facing their teams:
Enablement resources have been halved due to overall sales team reduction,
but output expectations remain similar.
The layoffs are throwing everything for a loop, and now it's time to reassess
once again who does what and what our goals are.
Sometimes it's not about the leaders' buy-in, but more so just keeping them
on track, as their plates are very full (too full, in my opinion) to help us deliver
consistent messaging and reinforce behavior.
Notably, the last set of statistics showed us that 37.84% of enablers see a lack of budget as
one of their top three challenges. Let’s take a deeper look at what our respondents expect to
happen to their budgets - are they going to go up in a time when an increase is needed?
Do you expect your enablement budget to increase or decrease in the next 12 months?
51.79%
48.65%
33.93%
29.05%
10.14% 10.71%
5.41% 3.38%
1.79%
0%
What is good to see is that no enabler who saw a lack of budget as a major challenge is
expecting a significant decrease in available funds.
Overall, only around 10-15% of enablers are expecting to see the budget available to them
drop. In a time when enablement’s value has been questioned, this is a positive sign.
Unfortunately, the enablement industry has seen layoffs in recent times, and we wanted to
better understand the extent of these and how organizations have been affected.
Other
0.7%
Yes
58.45%
No
40.85%
Decreased
Increased
headcount
headcount
30.99%
33.1%
While we know how valuable enablement is, and how much potential it has to improve
organizations when properly resourced, we hope that stakeholders and leaders start seeing
that too.
Industry challenges
To cap off our section on enablement challenges, we wanted to hear from our respondents
on what they believe the biggest challenges facing the industry as a whole are.
The aforementioned layoffs, budget issues, and a lack of understanding among stakeholders
are all problems - but we wanted to hear from real-life enablement professionals what they
see as the defining challenge for enablement overall.
People not understanding the true role and scope of what enablement does
means it ends up bigger and diluted to everything training. Training is not the
be all, end all to enablement.
Scalability. Most of the enablers haven't realized that the problem isn't about
not having enough enablers, but about not finding a scalable way of working.
I think it's a new and evolving function. The main challenges come from within.
I love what I see happening in the landscape from thought leaders to actual
sales enablement forums and groups. I get great support and ideas from
other sales enablement professionals.
Hybrid
18.92% In-person
53.38%
Virtual
21.62%
Virtual
17.57%
The in-person connection can’t be beaten by over half of our respondents’ organizations, with
53.38% of previous SKOs being held face-to-face. Additionally, 42.57% already know their
next event will be in-person as well.
Sales Enablement Landscape Report 2023 53
While face-to-face interaction is popular for good reason, what are the most effective ways
to engage reps at SKOs?
What type of session tends to be most engaging for reps during your SKO?
47.97%
22.97%
14.19%
8.78%
4.05%
Workshop sessions were the overwhelming favorite type of session, with gamified and
competition sessions trailing behind in second place.
Both of these (47.97% and 22.97%) are considerably more popular than the traditional
keynote sessions - less than 15% of our respondents think presentations are the most
engaging type of session at an SKO.
We hope that these numbers enlighten enablement job seekers, and help them tailor their CVs
and personal development.
Communication - 43.24%
Creativity - 13.51%
Leadership skills - 0%
Organization - 12.84%
Grit - 4.73%
Proactivity - 17.57%
Adaptability - 18.92%
Team-oriented - 10.14%
The two most popular skills were communication (43.24%) and project management
(35.81%). Communicating information is at the heart of enablement, whether it’s to sales reps
or cross-functional stakeholders, so it’s not surprising that it ranks so highly here.
But what about when hiring for senior roles - do our respondents’ priorities change?
Communication - 23.65%
Creativity - 2.03%
Organization - 9.46%
Grit - 2.7%
Proactivity - 8.11%
Adaptability - 9.46%
Team-oriented - 7.43%
What’s interesting is that only 2.03% see creativity as a top skill for senior roles, with 11.48%
seeing it as extremely important in junior roles. Could it be that the creative, outside-the-box
ideas are left to more junior members of enablement teams while the senior enablement
leaders focus on strategic, big-picture items?
Over half (52.7%) of our respondents on hiring teams view strategic thinking skills as critical in
senior roles, but it’s seen as much less important for junior positions.
Here’s some more commentary from our respondents on the most important skills for an
enablement professional to possess:
A balance of some sales and L&D experience — some come from one
background more than the other (totally ok!), but they should come with both.
An ability to prioritize tasks at hand - enablement will always have more asks
than bandwidth to deliver.
Curiosity is key. I want to see they have a willingness and interest to learn. We
have a highly intelligent community and I want them to feel empowered through
curiosity not intimidated.
I look for people my sales team will trust. Are they likable? Does conversation
come easy? Would my reps be comfortable sharing to this person? How does this
person deliver feedback?
Enablers need to be agile and think quickly and expect the unexpected. They
need to deal with a lot of emotions and understand it isn't personal.
Now that we have an understanding of the most desirable skills in enablement, it’s time to
look at how enablers tackle personal development, networking, and upskilling.
Which of the following methods are you using to upskill and develop new knowledge
in enablement?
75%
63.51% 62.16%
58.11%
51.35%
48.65%
17.57%
75.68%
73.65%
40.54%
29.05%
21.62%
It won’t shock you to know that LinkedIn and social networking sites are the most popular
ways to network with enablement peers (75.68%). In fact, if you’re reading this report there’s a
good chance you found it there. Closely following social media are enablement communities
and groups, just like us at Sales Enablement Collective! 73.65% of our respondents use these
groups to network.
Interestingly, when it comes to upskilling most of our respondents are branching out across
a variety of methods. Every option besides local meetups and eBooks/articles garnered over
50%, but for all intents and purposes only local meetups weren’t popular among
our enablers.
Artificial intelligence
in enablement
It’s impossible to talk about any job role in 2023 without discussing artificial intelligence (AI).
After an initial worldwide fear that “this is going to make my job irrelevant”, there’s been a
perspective shift towards looking at how AI can make people more effective in their roles.
There are a whole host of ways that AI can be used in enablement, and so we asked our
respondents how they felt about these developments and how much they’d embraced them.
44.59%
33.11%
18.24%
It seems that AI gets an A+ grade from enablement professionals, with 77.7% feeling
optimistic about the growth of AI in the sales and enablement space.
This could very well be related to the fact that teams are forever being asked to do “more
with less”, whether that be budget or team members. AI has the potential to support
enablement significantly in that way.
Only a very small percentage of our respondents (1.36%) feel pessimistic about these
developments, further showing the eagerness of enablers to embrace AI.
Occasionally
54.05%
While AI has only just really burst into public consciousness in the past 12 months, 75.67% of
our respondents are using AI at least occasionally in their day-to-day role. Additionally, over
half (57.44%) are already planning on adopting AI tools into their tech stack going forward, a
strong vote of confidence in the technology.
Here’s a list of just some of the answers we received when we asked respondents whether
they could: “Expand on how your teams use AI?”.
The fact that there’s already such a wide range of use cases highlights that it’s an exciting
time to be an enablement tech stack aficionado.
Revenue analytics Discovery training and role play simulations Content creation
Summarize meeting notes LinkedIn and social media posts Predictive analytics
But we also asked those who aren’t actively using AI why they’ve opted against it - and our
respondents shared some valid concerns:
Whether it’s privacy concerns, doubts about the quality of AI output, or simply not being in the
position to invest in AI, not all of our respondents are riding the AI wave quite yet.
The future of
enablement
Our final set of questions focuses on the future of enablement as a function. When it comes to
the future of our respondents’ roles specifically, we wanted to get a genuine understanding of
their frame of mind.
41.22% 40.54%
13.51%
2.7% 0.68%
Again, seeing that over four in five (81.76%) of our enablement professionals have an at least
somewhat positive outlook on the future of this critical function – despite the ups and downs
of recent months – is encouraging to see.
“I am a very optimistic person, but I also worry that with the economy
shrinking, more and more enablement positions will be eliminated because
they are not directly revenue-generating.”
“I’ve seen how sales training was devalued and divested over the prior two
decades. Will enablement wither as well?”
“When I started in this space, the term enablement wasn't even used. Now just
about any decently-sized enterprise has some type of enablement function
or plans to build one”
“Enablement, just like all other forms of education, is critical to any business
growth. With the ever-growing volume of competitors and new entrants into
all markets, it comes down to skills more so than it does product.”
One of the ongoing discussions about the future of sales enablement involves the duty of
enablement and who it should actually be helping out.
What began as “sales” enablement has evolved into “revenue,” or “GTM” enablement across
certain organizations, with the function supporting more teams than anyone would’ve initially
envisioned.
We put it to our respondents, asking them exactly what departments should be served by
enablement in their ideal world.
Sales - 5.41%
Company-wide - 16.89%
What immediately stands out is that despite “sales” enablement being the name of the
game, only 5.41% of our respondents would, in an ideal world, serve only sales.
It speaks to the power of enablement as a cross-functional force that the two most popular
selections were serving revenue-generating teams (29.73%) and serving GTM teams
(46.62%).
While this is the ideal state that most of our respondents want, it remains to be seen how long
it’ ll take for this setup to become the standard in organizations.
Sales Enablement Landscape Report 2023 73
Ideal reporting structure
Another similar discussion point in the enablement sphere is who the function should
report to, with many stating that the Chief Revenue Officer is the ideal point of contact for
enablement.
C-suite - 44.59%
Sales - 23.65%
Marketing - 1.35%
Almost half (44.59%) of enablement professionals would ideally want to report directly to
the C-suite, which is the largest selection by quite a margin. Once again, this highlights the
cross-functional aspirations of enablement - reporting to the C-suite is a surefire way to gain
buy-in from stakeholders and reach across the wider organization.
As ever, through these results, we hope to give enablement professionals a glimpse into
the situations of their peers - the willingness to share knowledge, ideas, and advice is
just one of the things that makes the enablement community so great.
Our hope is that this report helps highlight the value and significance that enablement
brings to modern organizations. We’d be remiss to not thank every single one of our
respondents, as this piece of research would not be possible without them.
Daniel O'Dowd
Copywriter
Daniel enjoys writing, whether it’s 100 words or 1,000. He has a degree in
Journalism from Dublin City University and had a stint working in sales
before he moved from writing freelance, to creating content full-time for
the Sales Enablement Collective.
Jack Debono
Head of Sales Enablement Collective
Jack has a passion for all things events. He loves being able to bring
communities closer together and does exactly that in his role with SEC.
Ivana Pusceddu
Senior Artworker
Ivana is our in-house Senior Artworker and looks at all our design
requirements. She's responsible for the layout and visual elements in
this report and is always happy to hear your thoughts!