Chap03 Steady Heat Conduction
Chap03 Steady Heat Conduction
Yunus A. Cengel
McGraw-Hill, New York, 2007
CHAPTER 3
STEADY HEAT CONDUCTION
"This course material has been developed using the notes prepared by Prof. Dr. Ali Pınarbaşı."
OUTLINE
Steady Heat Conduction in Plane Walls
Thermal Contact Resistance
Generalized Thermal Resistance Networks
Heat Conduction in Cylinders and Spheres
Critical Radius of Insulation
Heat Transfer from Finned Surfaces
Heat Transfer in Common Configurations
Conclusions
2
Steady Heat Conduction In Plane Walls
Heat transfer through the wall is in the
normal direction to the wall surface, and no
significant heat transfer takes place in the
wall in other directions.
3
Integrating and rearranging
• Energy balance:
where
can be rearranged as
with
6
The rate of radiation heat transfer between a surface of emissivity ε and
area As at temperature Ts and the surrounding surfaces at some average
temperature Tsurr can be expressed as
7
The convection and radiation resistances are parallel to each other, and may
cause some complication in the thermal resistance network.
8
Thermal Resistance Network
The thermal resistance network for heat transfer through a plane wall subjected
to convection on both sides, and the electrical analogy.
9
Under steady conditions
11
Analogous to Newton’s law of cooling as
12
Multilayer Plane Walls
The rate of steady heat transfer Rtotal: the total thermal resistance
through a plane wall consisting
of two layers
13
for the resistances in series.
14
the steady rate of heat transfer through the wall can be
determined from
15
16
17
18
THERMAL CONTACT RESISTANCE
In the analysis of heat conduction through multilayer solids, we assumed
“perfect contact” at the interface of two layers, and thus no temperature drop
at the interface.
Thermal Contact Resistance (Rc.): the resistance per unit interface area
19
Heat transfer through the interface of
two metal rods of cross-sectional area
A is the sum of the heat transfers
through the solid contact spots and the
gaps in the noncontact areas and can
be expressed as
20
The thermal contact conductance is expressed as
21
Effect of metallic coatings on
thermal contact conductance
22
The thermal contact conductance is highest (with the lowest contact
resistance) for soft metals with smooth surfaces at high pressure.
23
GENERALIZED THERMAL RESISTANCE NETWORKS
with
Thermal resistance
network for two parallel layers.
24
For the combined series-parallel arrangement, the total rate of heat transfer
through this composite system is
with
and
Two assumptions:
(i) any plane wall normal to the x-axis is
isothermal and
(ii) any plane parallel to the x-axis is adiabatic.
1 1
Ric = = = 0.0095 K / W
Heat transfer from entire of wall
hi A 7.15
If a thermal resistans network is applied
between inner surface of the wall and inner
medium air
T − T T − 20 T¥1 = 29.17 C
Q = 1 s = 1 = 962.6
Ric 0.0095
27
28
29
The three resistances R3, R4, and R5 in the middle are
parallel, and their equivalent resistance is determined from
30
31
HEAT CONDUCTION IN CYLINDERS AND SPHERES
The Fourier’s law of heat conduction for heat
transfer through the cylindrical layer is
32
The thermal resistance of the cylindrical layer against heat conduction, or
simply the conduction resistance of the cylinder layer.
33
The rate of heat transfer through a cylindrical or spherical layer under
steady conditions:
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
CRITICAL RADIUS OF INSULATION
The rate of heat transfer from the insulated
pipe to the surrounding air is
cylindrical body
spherical body
45
Consider steady operation with no heat generation in the fin with the
following assumptions:
47
From Fourier’s law of heat conduction we have
Ac : the cross-sectional
area of the fin at location x
48
Infinitely Long Fin (Tfin tip = T∞)
For a sufficiently long fin of uniform cross section (Ac= Constant):
p : the perimeter
Ac : the cross-sectional area of the fin
x : the distance from the fin base
49
The fin tip can be assumed to be insulated, and the condition at the fin tip can be
expressed as
The rate of heat transfer from the fin can be determined again from Fourier’s law
of heat conduction:
The heat transfer relations for the very long fin and the fin with negligible heat
loss at the tip differ by the factor tanh aL, which approaches 1 as L becomes very
large.
50
Convection (or Combined Convection and
Radiation) from Fin Tip
52
Fin efficiency:
53
54
55
Efficiency of straight fins of rectangular, triangular, and parabolic profiles.
56
Efficiency of annular fins of constant thickness t.
57
Fins with triangular and parabolic profiles contain less material and are
more efficient than the ones with rectangular profiles, and thus are more
suitable for applications requiring minimum weight such as space
applications.
The larger the fin, the bigger the mass, the higher the price, and the
larger the fluid friction. Therefore, increasing the length of the fin beyond
a certain value cannot be justified unless the added benefits outweigh
the added cost.
Fin lengths that cause the fin efficiency to drop below 60% percent
usually cannot be justified economically and should be avoided. The
efficiency of most fins used in practice is above 90%.
58
Fin Effectiveness
The performance of fins expressed in terms of the fin effectiveness εfin is
defined
59
❖ An effectiveness of εfin= 1 indicates that the addition of fins to the
surface does not affect heat transfer at all.
The fin efficiency and fin effectiveness are related to each other by
60
The effectiveness of a sufficiently long fin of uniform cross section under steady
conditions is determined to be
since Ac = Ab.
In the design and selection of the fins, the following should be taken into account:
❖ The thermal conductivity k of the fin material should be as high as possible. Thus
it is no coincidence that fins are made from metals, with copper, aluminum, and
iron being the most common ones. Perhaps the most widely used fins are made
of aluminum because of its low cost and weight and its resistance to corrosion.
❖ The ratio of the perimeter to the cross-sectional area of the fin p/Ac should be as
high as possible. This criterion is satisfied by thin plate fins and slender pin fins.
❖ The use of fins is most effective in applications involving a low convection heat
transfer coefficient.
61
The rate of heat transfer for a surface containing n fins can be expressed as
63
64
HEAT TRANSFER IN COMMON CONFIGURATIONS
• We have dealt with 1-D simple geometries.
The question:What happens if we have 2- or 3-D complicated geometries?
• The steady rate of heat transfer between two surfaces at constant temperatures
T1 and T2 is expressed as
The conduction shape factor depends on the geometry of the system only.
A comparison of the following equations reveals that the conduction shape factor
S is related to the thermal resistance R by R = 1/kS or S = 1/kR.
65
66
67
68
69
Concluding Points:
❖ Steady and One-Dimensional Modeling of Heat Transfer through a Wall
❖ Conduction and Convection Resistances
❖ Analogy between Thermal and Electrical Resistances
❖ Radiation and Combined Heat Transfer Coefficients
❖ Overall Heat Transfer Coefficient
❖ Heat Transfer through a Plane and Multilayer Plane Walls
❖ Thermal Contact Resistance
❖ Generalized Thermal Resistance Networks
❖ Heat Conduction in Multilayered Cylinders and Spheres
❖ Critical Radius of Insulation for Cylindrical and Spherical Bodies
❖ Heat Transfer from Finned Surfaces
❖ Fin Efficiency, Fin Effectiveness and Overall Effectiveness
❖ Important Considerations in the Design and Selection of Fins
❖ Heat Transfer in Common Configurations and Conduction Shape Factors
70