TITLE OF YOUR PAPER (for professional papers) 1

publication of the Open Data, Open Society report, finished in late October 2010 and

published in early January 2011. That first report focused on explaining the critical

importance of digital data in contemporary society and business activities; defining

Open Data; giving examples on their potential, especially at the local level, on

transparency and economics activities; finally, defining summarizing some general best

practices.

This second report looks at what happened in the Open Data arena after October 2010.

After some considerations on the general social and political background in late

2010/early 2011, it is divided in two main parts. The first describes some emerging

trends and issues related to Open Data, that got minor or no coverage in the first report.

The second part discusses some practices and actions to follow to deal with those

trends and issues.

2. Social and political landscape

It is worthwile to begin by mentioning several events, happened between the end of

2010 and the first months of 2011, that can help to understand what will be the place

and role of Open Data in the future, as well as the challenges faced by its advocates.

The first two are the Spanish "Indignados" and the Arab Spring. The first movement has

among its goals "a change in society and an increase in social awareness". The Arab

Spring, as L. Millar put it on the New Zealand Computer Society website, "

demonstrated the potency of technology to reflect citizens' views of government

TITLE OF YOUR PAPER (for professional papers) 2

systems that are not transparent." As a consequence, noted the Afrinnovator blog, "we

have seen from the civil disobedience in the North of Africa and the Middle East, the

appetite for more accountable and transparent government will only grow from here on".

From these analyses it looks like, in a way, both the Indignados and the participants to

the Arab Spring are (also) asking for Open Data, even if they aren't using the term and

many participants to these grassroots movement may still ignore its definition, that was

born inside hackers and Public Administration circles.

Other two important events that, in different ways and at different levels, prove the

importance of Open Data are the Fukushima nuclear accident and the Cablegate, which

we'll analyze in the next paragraph. Whatever one may think about nuclear power,

Fukushima remembered how important total transparency and accountability are in the

management and maintenance of all power sources, and in the decision-making

processes that create the corresponding public policies.

For the meantime, we'll note how all these events seem to hint that structural need and

bottom-up demand for Open Data are mounting everywhere, even in cultural contexts

very differen than those in which Open Data was born, and even if sometimes they are

not mentioned explicitly or consciously. Even in Western Countries, the high-level

motivations, for the transparency and governance models that inspire Open Data,

frompositions different than those from which the movement started, are increasing. In

1931 Pope Pio XI wrote, in the Encyclic Quadragesimo anno that:

TITLE OF YOUR PAPER (for professional papers) 3

80. The supreme authority of the State ought, therefore, to let subordinate groups

handle matters and concerns of lesser importance, which would otherwise dissipate its

efforts greatly. Thereby the State will more freely, powerfully, and effectively do all those

things that belong to it alone because it alone can do them: directing, watching, urging,

restraining, as occasion requires and necessity demands. Therefore, those in power

should be sure that the more perfectly a graduated order is kept among the various

associations, in observance of the principle of "subsidiary function," the stronger social

authority and effectiveness will be the happier and more prosperous the condition of the

State.

This is the principle of subsidiarity, often summarized in a way that may sound familiar

to many Open Data advocates: "What men can do by themselves with their own

resources can't be taken away from them and assigned as a task to society". In March

2011, journalist Guido Gentili made just this connection. After noting that the principle

was also introduced in the Italian Constitution by the 2001 reform of article 118, he

concluded that subsidiarity as a strategy for development isn't an English invention and

the "Big Society" vision (a proposl in which Open data is key) would do good to Italy

too".

At a more practical and economical level, digital information continues to increase. In

spite of mounting cost pressures, large public and private organizations have to

maintain massive amounts of structured and unstructured data, that keep growing, both

for their own internal needs and to simply comply with government regulations. At the

same time, signals that traditional public services and the whole welfare state won't
TITLE OF YOUR PAPER (for professional papers) 4

remain sustainable for long with traditional means, continue to arrive, therefore

strengthening the search for radical, innovative and cost-effective solutions.

Besides costs, another practical driver and justification for Open Data that is becoming

more and more concrete over time is damage control. In a world that produces digital

data without interruption, uncontrolled and unpredictable data releases are facts of life

that are very hard to predict, practically impossible to avoid and increasingly common.

Opening public government data, that is providing plenty of officially verified information,

becomes therefore also a damage control solution, to prevent or at least minimize

damages from such uncontrolled releases. Without official Open Public Data, individual

citizens, political parties or other organizations will start to process and compare (if they

already aren't...) data from unofficial sources anyway, maybe from different countries. In

such cases, it will be unavoidable not reach sometimes, even in good faith, wrong

conclusions. This is not some theoretical possibility far in the future, as this real world

example (from a comment to an Open Data discussion in an italian blog) proves:

"on the [non italian] Geonames website you can download geo-referenced data about...

47000 Italian municipalities. That worries me, because there are only 8094 of them.

Besides, I grabbed a few random data about population, and I can guarantee you that

not one was right. What should be done in such cases?

TITLE OF YOUR PAPER (for professional papers) 5

From an Open Data perspective, all these recent stories have (at least) one thing in

common: they suggest that, considering its current needs and problems, current

societies want and need more Open Data than they already have.

2.1. Wikileaks and the Open Data movement

During the 2010/2011 winter the discussions around the Cablegate and other

documents published by Wikileaks have, in some occasion, included hostility towards

Open Data. This is a consequence of a more or less conscious mixing of the two

themes, because in a very general sense, both Open Data and Wikileaks are about

transparency, accountability and democracy.

As far as this study is concerned, two conclusions can be drawn from the

Cablegate/Wikileaks scandal.

The first is that, in practice, it is necessary to find and equilibrium between secrecy and

transparency whenever government activities are concerned. Citizens must be able to

know what the state is actually doing but sometimes, be it for careful evaluation of all

the alternatives or because of security, it must be possible to work behind closed doors,

at least temporarily. We'll come back to this point later in this report.

The second conclusion is that, while certainly both Open Data and Wikileaks are about

openness and transparency in politics, not only there are deep differencies between the

two ideas but, in our opinion, the Wikileaks experience proves the advantages of Open

Data.
TITLE OF YOUR PAPER (for professional papers) 6

Was Wikileaks right to publish the cable? Were the specific facts and behaviors

uncovered by Cablegate right or wrong? The answer to these questions are outside the

scope of this document. Here we only wish to point out that Cablegate and Wikileaks, at

least in the form we've known them so far, have been about:

● reacting to problems after they occurred

● without any intervention and involvement of the parties and organizations that

may have behaved improperly

Open Data, instead, is about prevention of errors, abuses and inefficiencies, through

conscious and continuous collaboration of citizens and governments officials during day

to day operations, if not before their beginning.

Of course, citizens must always check that they aren't getting incomplete or biased

data. But in any case, Open Data means that the involved government officials aren't

just prepared to see that data published, they know and accept it from the start. In such

a context, some risks associated to Wikileaks, like the fact that the leaker lacks the

means to influence the downstream use of the information, and therefore may harm

anybody connected to the linked information, are almost non-existant.

Above all, unlike the content of most Wikileaks documents, Open Data are almost

always data that should surely be open, unlike wartime military reports, and that almost

never contain any personal information. In summary, whatever the conclusions about

Wikileaks are, they could not be conclusions against Open Data, because there are too

many differences between the two movements.

TITLE OF YOUR PAPER (for professional papers) 7

2.2. Data Openness in EU

Both the interest and the need for data opennes at the European Union level remain

high. Here, without making any complete analysis, we'll only report and comment a few

relevant episodes. While studies continue to point at the political and economical

advantages of Open Data, great inefficiencies and delays still keep the time and cost

savings that could be achieved a far goal for the European Union.

All the principles of the Open Declaration (collaboration, transparency, empowerment)

have been declared key areas of action of the new EC eGov action plan. Particularly

important, as explained by David Osimo in EU eGov action plan published: the good,

the bad and the unknown, are the actions on Open Data (a EU portal and a revision of

the EU PSI directive), and on citizens control over their data. However the Action Plan

contains no reference to the need for a more open and collaborative governance.

In the case of European Structural Funds, as Luigi Reggi reported in March 2011:

there is no single point of access to the data. Hundreds of Managing Authorities are

following different paths and implementing different information strategies when opening

up their data.
TITLE OF YOUR PAPER (for professional papers) 8

Many databases (often simple PDF lists) [...show...] huge variation not only in the way

they can be accessed but also in content and quality of data provided.

... [...The results of...] an independent web-based survey on the overall quality of data

published by each Managing Authority responsible for the 434 Operational Programmes

approved in July 2009... can be summarized as follows:

The use of open, machine-processable and linked-data formats have unexpected

advantages in terms of transparency and re-use of the data by the public and private

sector. The application of these technical principles does not need extra budget or

major changes in government organization and information management; nor does it

require the update of existing software and infrastructures. What is needed today is the

promotion among national and local authorities of the culture of transparency and the

raising of awareness of the benefits that could derive from opening up existing data and

information in a re-usable way.

TITLE OF YOUR PAPER (for professional papers) 9

TheEuropean Cohesion Policy is only halfway to accomplishing a paradigm shift to

open data, with differences in performance both between and - in some cases - within

European Countries.

Things don't go much better for the European Union in the energy field. Carlo Stagnaro

wrote in EU Energy Orwellianism: Ignorance Is Strength:

Energy is an active area of EU public policy. Yet authorities are not revealing

information (data is surely has) that is crucial to determine whether its policies are

distorting the market and come at too high a cost to society. This is a major fault in

Europe's credibility in advancing its policy goals, as well as a serious limitation to the

accountability of the policy making process

We realized that, while strongly supporting green investments the EU does not know, or

does not make it public, how much is spent every year on green subsidies... With regard

to green jobs, several estimates exist, but no official figure is provided.

TITLE OF YOUR PAPER (for professional papers) 10

More recently... I discovered that Eurostat does not tell how much coal capacity is

installed - as opposed to natural gas- or oil-fueled generation plants. It is possible to

know how much coal is used, but not the amount of fixed capital which is invested in

coal plants. If data are not available, every conclusion is questionable because it relies

on assumptions or estimates.

2.3. Open Data in Latin America, Asia and Africa

Several countries in Latin America are studying and making experiments with Open

Data both at the government and at the grassroots level. The same is happening, on a

much smaller scale, in a few parts of Asia and Africa. On average, the volume of these

Open Data experiments and the level of local interest and awareness around them is

still lower than what is happening in Europe and North America. In spite of this we

suggest that it is important, for public officials and civic activists in Western Countries, to

follow these developments closely. The reason is that they may turn into very useful test

beds for all the strengths and limits of Open Data, especially those not encountered yet

where the movement was born.

In fact, the original discourse and arguments around Open Data are heavily Western

centric. The problem they want to solve is how to make democracy work better in

countries where it already exists and which share a great amount of history and

cultural/philosophical values.

Other countries face very different challenges, from the philosophical level to the

practical one. A common issue in developing countries, for example, is that there is very
TITLE OF YOUR PAPER (for professional papers) 11

little to open simply because much PSI (Public Sector Information) doesn't exist in

digital format yet. Therefore, the first thing to do is to create data, normally through

outsorcing and crowdsourcing.

Other issues, that will be discussed in detail in other sections of the report because they

are also present in Europe in different forms, are related to lack of equal opportunities

for access to data and serious fears (sometimes, concrete, sometimes caused by

confusion about what should be open and how) that data will be used against citizens. A

commenter to Gurstein's Open Data: Empowering the Empowered or Effective Data

Use for Everyone?said:

in Delhi and Mumbai, mobs and rioters managed to get information about particular

identity groups through voter rolls: openness is, in certain situations, a precarious virtue.

It is almost certain that Open Data would be used to rig election but here again

openness is not the issue, they would find it anyway...

So far, the main interest about Open Data in Asian countries seems limited, so to

speak, to its effects on transparency in politics. At a two-weeks programming contest

held at the end of 2010 in Thailand, for example, one of the most appreciated entries

was a software scraper of the Thailand's Member of House of Representative Website,

that made it possible for everybody to create applications using those data.
TITLE OF YOUR PAPER (for professional papers) 12

Right now, one of the most active Asian countries in the Open Data arena is India,

which also signed an Open Government partnership with the USA in November 2010.

In January 2011 the Indian Congress Party announced plans for a new law to fight

corruption among public servants and politicians. Anti-corruption websites (including

ones in local dialects) like Indiaagainstcorruption.org, already existed, including one,

Ipaidabribe.com, that collected more than 3,000 people reports of graft in its first four

months.

As it happens in Asia, even Latin America is currently focused, at least outside Public

Administration circles, on how to open public data to achieve actual transparency. This

appears even from the way many projects are labeled, that is "Civic Information" instead

of Open Data (which is an idea starting from data reuse) or Open Government.

The reason is that even where good Freedom of Information laws exist in Latin America,

they still have too little practical effects. Mexico, for example, already has a digital

system to manage Freedom of Information requests, but there are reports of complaints

filed against municipal officials that either have no effect at all, or aren't possible in the

first place, because relevant information has not been updated in years, or omits key

data like (in the case of budget reports) "descriptions of how the money was spent".

Even with these difficulties, the Latin America Open Data/Civic Information landscape is

active and definitely worthwhile following. The list of interesting Civic Information

projects in Latin America include (from Sasaki's Access to Information: Is Mexico a

Model for the Rest of the World?:

● Mexico
TITLE OF YOUR PAPER (for professional papers) 13

○ Mexican Farm Subsidies - an online tool to analyze how the federal

government allocates those subsidies

○ Compare Your School: compares aggregate test results from any school

with the municipal, regional, and national averages

○ Rebellion of the Sick built for patients with chronic diseases whose

expenses are not covered by the government subsidized health coverage.

● Argentina: Public Spending in Bahía analyzes how public funds are used.

● Colombia: Visible Congress monitors the actions of the Colombian congress

● Brazil

○ Eleitor 2010: a website to submit reports of electoral fraud during the

Brazil 2010 elections

○ Open Congress: a tool for political scientists to track the work and

effectiveness of the Brazilian congress

● Paraguay: Who Do We Choose?: lists profiles of all candidates for many public

posts.

In Brazil, the principle that "what is not confidential should be available on the Internet in

the open data format" is already discussed and, in principle, accepted, by some

departments of the Brazilian federal government. However, the preferred practice for

now is (if there are no other obstacles) to only publish data that have been explicitly

requested by some citizens.

A report presented in May 2011 at the First Global Conference on Transparency

Researchmentioned a couple of Open Data issues in Latin America that are worth
TITLE OF YOUR PAPER (for professional papers) 14

noting, because they're present even in Europe and North America, in spite of the

different historical and social background:

● "Better coordination is needed between right to information campaigners and

open data activists."

● "If activist manage to target particular topics to add "value" to the discussion,

demand for open data could eventually increase in the region."

In Africa, mobile phones are much more available, and more essential than computer

with Internet access, often bypassing the need for real desktop PCs with many

applications. Therefore, from a purely technical point of view, transparency,

accountability and efficiency in government are quickly becoming accessible to most

African citizens through mobile networks rather than through the "traditional" Internet.

However, there are still too few public departments and procedures that use digital

documents and procedures on a scale large enough to generate meaningful volumes of

digital data that could be then published online.

While we write, Kenya is laying the legal groundwork to support Open Data. Permanent

Secretary for Information and Communications, Dr. Bitange Ndemo is reported as hving

been championing for quite some time. In practice, big challenges remain for Open Data

usage in Kenya. The easiest one to solve is to technical, that is find skilled people that

can package the data in ways that the public can consume (even on mobile phones...).

The real problem, however, is the fact that (summarizing from Thinking About Africa's

Open Data):
TITLE OF YOUR PAPER (for professional papers) 15

There is a lot of Kenya data but it isn't accessible. The entities that hold the most public

and infrastructure data are always government institutions. Getting information from

them can be very hard indeed. We don't know who to go to to get the data we need, and

there is no mandate to support one group to centralize it.

Kenya's own OpenData.go.ke website has only ever seen a small handful of data sets,

none of which are now (early April 2011) available anymore. Groups like the Ministry of

Education might publish some information on schools, but they won't give anyone the

location data.

3. Emerging trends and issues related to

Open Data

One of the most common activities for Open Data activists in this moment is the

creation of country-wide catalogs of all data sources, to facilitate individuation and

correlation of independent data sets. Normally, all initiatives of this type are announced

on the Open Knowledge Foundation blog and/or its data hub CKAN. Another relevant

development is the publication of an Open Data Manual that "can be used by anyone

but is especially designed for those seeking to open up data, since it discusses why to
TITLE OF YOUR PAPER (for professional papers) 16

go open, what open is, and the how to 'Open' Data." Activists in several European

countries have already published local versions of the manual, or equivalent

documents. On this background, several interesting issues, some of which were

anticipated in the Open Data, Open Society report, are coming in full light. They are

presented, one at a time, in the following sections of this chapter.

3.1. Cost of not opening PSI is increasing

Much has been said on the economic benefits of opening public sector information, and

much more remains to be said and studied. One part of this issue that is becoming

more evident over time is that Open Data are the simplest, if not the only way, to save

Public Administrations from the costs that they have already (and rightfully!) forced

themselves to bear, through assorted laws and official regulations. This is explained

well in the report from LinkedGov about the economic impact of open data:

(p. 2) "As the costs of disseminating and accessing information have declined, the

transactions costs associated with charging for access to information, and controlling

subsequent redistribution have come to constitute a major barrier to access in

themselves. As a result, the case for free (gratis) provision of Public Sector Information

is stronger than has already been recognised.

TITLE OF YOUR PAPER (for professional papers) 17

Eaves provides a practical example from Canada in Access to Information is Fatally

Broken… You Just Don't Know it Yet: the number of Access to Information Requests

(ATIP) has almost tripled since 1996. Such growth might be manageable if the costs of

handling each requests was dropping rapidly, but it has more than quadrupled.

Unfortunately, alternatives like charging for access to data or cutting the budget for

providing them to citizens remain very common in spite of their negative effects.

According to Eaves, the first practice has already caused areduction in the number of

freedom of information requests filed by citizens, while budget cuts invariably and

greatly delay processing times.

3.2. Creative, unforeseen uses of local Open Data

increase

Proofs that, as cited in the Open Data, Open Society report, "Data is like soil", that is

valuable not in itself, but because of what grows on it, often in ways that the landowner

couldn't imagine, continue to arrive. Here is an example from Day Two: Follow the Data,

Iterating and the $1200 problem:

Ed Reiskin noticed a problem with street cleaning. Some trucks would go out, coming

back with little or no trash depending on the day and route they took. After getting the
TITLE OF YOUR PAPER (for professional papers) 18

tonnalge logs, his team quickly realized that changing certain routes and reducing

service on others would save money (less gas, parts, labor) and the environment (less

pollution, gas consumption, water). A year later, the department realized a little over a

million dollars in savings. The point? Follow the data.

The value embedded in data isn't only economical or political, but also social. Here are

a few examples.

At the Amsterdam fire brigade, once a fire alarm starts, all sorts of data is collected, to

maximize the probabilities to save lives and property, about the location and the route to

the emergency: constructions on the way, latest updates from Openstreetmap, the type

of house and if possible more data such as construction dates, materials, people living

there and so on.

Using the geographical coordinates embedded in online photo databases like Flickr,

digital cartographer Eric Fischer creates maps that highlight people behavior. For

example, he documented how, in Berlin, most locals tend to stay in the same

neighborhoods and don't go to West Berlin or to the outskirts of the city. This

information has economic value, journalist Kayser-Bril noted: "You can then sell this for

instance to businessmen who want to open a shop in Berlin for tourists, and telling them

where to go and where not to go."

Norwegian transport company Kolumbus has embedded 1,200 bus stops with barcodes

in the square QR format, that can encode text or URLs. Scanning those codes with a

free software application for smartphones loads a website that lists upcoming bus

departure times. Later, Kolumbus partnered with a project called "Tales of Things" to
TITLE OF YOUR PAPER (for professional papers) 19

allow people to leave messages for each other (or just for the world) at the bus stops.

Scanning the QR code now allows people to see not just the bus timetable, but also the

notes other travelers have left on that stop, including "what's nearby, who's waiting for

whom, what number can you call for a good time. It's a cross between bus stop

Facebook and digital graffiti", that happened thanks to the openness of the original bus

stop data.

The Social Life of Data Project will study instead how particular datasets have been

used, who used them, how those people are connected and what conversations happen

around Open Data.

3.3. Legal issues remain crucial

Proper licensing of Public data is essential. The more Open Data activities continue, the

clearer this rule becomes. What distinguishes Open Data from "mere" transparency is

reuse. Paraphrasing Eaves, until a government get the licensing issue right, Open Data

cannot bring all the possible benefits in that country. If there are no guarantees that

public data can be used without restriction, very little happens in practice, and when it

happens it may be something against the public interest.

Canadian Company Public Engines Inc, that is paid by local police departments to

collect, process and analyze official crime data, also publishes online, with a proprietary

license, anonymized summaries of those data. When in 2010 another company, Report

See Inc, scraped those data from their website to reuse them, Public Engines sued.
TITLE OF YOUR PAPER (for professional papers) 20

Reporting this, D. Eaves rightly points out that both companies are right: one is trying to

protect its investment, the other is simply trying to reuse what IS public data, by getting

it from the ONLY place where it's available. This is what happens when public officials

leave the ownership of public data to the third parties hired to collect them. Please note

that, in practice, it makes very little difference whether those third parties are private,

for-profit corporations or even other Public Administrations. Unless, of course, there are

national laws already in place that define in advance what is the license of all present

and future Public Data, no matter how they were generated and by whom, those data

can be lost in any moment for society. In all other cases, the legal status of data will be

either officially closed and locked, or uncertain enough to prevent most or all reuses. In

February 2011, the news came that, even if they weren't the original copyright holders,

Public Engines had been able to put together enough legal claims to convince Report

See to give up.

Disputes like this should not happen and would not happen if all contracts regarding

collection and management of PSI clearly specified that all the resulting data either go

directly into the public domain (after being anonymized if necessary, of course) or

remain exclusive property of the government. Even ignoring data openness, this is

essential for at least three other reasons. The first is to protect a public administration

from having to pay twice for those data, if it needs it again in the future for some other

internal activity, not explicitly mentioned in the initial contract. The second reason is to

not spend more than what is absolutely necessary to respond to public records

requests, that is to comply with Freedom of Information laws.

TITLE OF YOUR PAPER (for professional papers) 21

The final reason is to guarantee quality assurance and detection of abuses at the

smallest cost, that is sharing it with all the citizens using the public services based on

those data. A real world example of this point comes from the "Where's My Villo?"

service in Brussels. Villo! is a citi-wide bike-sharing scheme started in May 2009,

through a partnerships with a private company: JCDecaux finances the infrastructure

and operates it, in exchange for advertising space on the bikes themselves and on

billboards at the bike sharing stations. The availability of bikes and parking spaces of

each station is published online in real time on the official Villo's website.

When the quality of service decreased, some citizens started "Where's My Villo?",

another website that reuses those data to measure where and how often there aren't

enough available bikes and parking spaces, in a way that made it impossible for

JCDecaux to deny the problems and stimulated it to fix them. Both this happy ending

and the fact that it came at almost no cost to the city, because citizens could monitor the

service by themselves, were possible just because the data from the official website

were legally and automatically reusable.

3.4. The price of digitization

In practice, public data can be opened at affordable costs, in a useful and easily usable

way, only if it is in digital format. As a consequence of this fact, demand for Open Data

exposes a problem that already existed and must be fixed anyway, regardless (again) of

openness. Any substantial increase of efficiency and reduction of the costs of Public

Administrations can only happen when data and procedures are digitized. The problem

is that such digitization (which, obviously, must happen anyway sooner or later) can be
TITLE OF YOUR PAPER (for professional papers) 22

very expensive and we are only now starting to really realize how much. Actual, material

costs are not the worst problem here. Activities like semi-automatic scanning of paper

documents or typing again their content inside some database, are relatively low, one-

time expenses that are also very easy to calculate and budget in advance with great

precision.

The real costs are those at the social, cultural, historical and workflow reorganization

level. What is really difficult, that is expensive in ways that are hard to predict, is to fit

inside digital, more or less automatic procedures and file templates, formats, habits and

customs developed, maybe over several centuries, in the analog, pre-computer world.

Developing countries are good case studies from this point of view, because they are

often leapfrogging from oral tradition straight to computers in all fields, not just e-

government.

Land ownership in India, discussed by Gurnstein in 2010, is a perfect example of the

problems carried by digitization that requests for Open Data only expose, without

creating them. Digitization can certainly increase efficiency, transparency and economic

activities, but fully achieves these goals only by:

● standardizing as much as possible all concepts, formats and procedures.

● replacing completely, at least in standard day to day procedures, whatever other

records and ways of working existed before

Gurnstein wrote:
TITLE OF YOUR PAPER (for professional papers) 23

"The problem of open access in the case of land records in India is... the manner in

which the data tends to get encoded. Typically, digitization of land records would mean

either scanning the record as it is, or inputting all the data on the record as it is, without

changing any fields. But ways of maintaining land records are highly diverse... Private

ownership is not the only means of holding a land parcel. When it comes to land

ownershipt, for example, it may eliminate the history of land, how were sub-divisions

and usufruct rights negotiated and enforced."

Another risk of digitization and e-government (without openness, that is) is lack of

contact between citizens and institutions:

"Prior to digitization, land records in India were available to people who made requests

with village accountants for them. .. after digitization of several services, village

accountants no longer personally visit the villages they are in charge of... What has

happened with digitization is a reorganization of earlier forms of social and political

relations. Accountability has moved from the immediate village level"

Of course, all these problems existed well before computers and return every time the

political or social order changes. The demand for Open Data is only increasing, by

orders of magnitude, the numbers of times in which we meet them.

TITLE OF YOUR PAPER (for professional papers) 24

3.5. The nature of Open Government and the relationship

between citizens and Government

Open Data are an essential part of Open Government. Almost everybody agrees with

this. Agreement on what exactly defines Open Government is, however, less universal.

In January 2011 Lucas Cioffi, replying to Alex Howard, wrote:

The biggest difference between Gov 2.0 and OpenGov seems to be how they approach

transparency. Gov 2.0 is about transparency through open data and the "government as

a platform" idea. "Open Government" is about Transparency for the sake of

accountability, but not necessarily interaction, cooperation and reuse of data outside the

government.

[who advocates] Open Data does so in order to make it accessible to citizens rather

than to hold government accountable. This is not to say that one approach is better than

another, but this is to say that there seem to be two very different motivations for
TITLE OF YOUR PAPER (for professional papers) 25

advocating for transparency, and they do seem to correlate to whether people label

themselves as part of Gov 2.0 or part of OpenGov.

In general, reflection and debate on this point is accelerating. At the moment, some

characteristics of Open Government on which there is more or less agreement are that

Open Government is about:

● deliberation, choice, influence on decisions and participation as a common

citizen

● letting all citizens use technology to participate, monitor and define government

activities. In other words, Government is really Open when it's based on

interaction, not only on some set of infrastructures and methods imposed top-

down

● diffused, seamless conversations, that are only possible with digital technologies,

online social networks and so on, between public employees and citizens.

The obvious potential limit of these definitions is that they rely on a big, still largely

unknown factor, that is actual citizen participation. When data are opened, the problem

becomes to have everybody use them, in order to actually realize Open Government as

defined above. This issue will be explored in detail in the next paragraphs, but we can

already say that Open Data are highlighting the critical, weak points in the present and

future relationship between citizens and governments.

While citizens participation is essential, especially in times of social and economic crisis,

achieving it on a large scale won't be easy. Frustration and lack of trust in institutions in
TITLE OF YOUR PAPER (for professional papers) 26

many countries are high, so it's no surprise when people express doubts that opening

government data won't help much in fixing things.

3.6. Clearer vision of the real risks and limits of Open

Data

Open Data, we already said, is about reuse. The point is, at least when the goal is Open

Government and transparency in politics, reuse by whom? There is no automatic cause-

effect relationship between Open Data and real transparency and democracy. On the

contrary, several problems may occur, if administrators and citizens don't pay close

attention.

3.6.1. Data alterations and financial sustainability

Some concerns about the limits of Open Data are about what may happen, or stop to

happen, before they are published online. The most common concerns of this type are

(from Open Public Data: Then What? - Part 1):

1. Opening up PSI causes those data to not be produced anymore, or to be only

produced as private property by private corporations, because the public

agencies whose job was to produce those data, can't sell them anymore.

2. total accessibility of data provides more incentives to tinker with them, at the risk

of reducing trust in institutions and inhibiting decision-making even more than

today.
TITLE OF YOUR PAPER (for professional papers) 27

Data manipulation is the topic of the next paragraph. Speaking of costs, a point to take

into account is that, once data are open, routinely used and monitored by as many

independent users as possible, eveb the cost of keeping them up to date may be

sensibly reduced: in other words, in the medium/long term Open Data may reduce the

need to periodically perform complete, that is very expensive, studies and surveys to

update a whole corpus of data in one run.

Besides, and above all, even if opening data always destroyed any source of income for

the public office that used to create and maintain them, this problem would only exist for

the PSI datasets that are already sold today. Such data, even if of strategic importance

as is the case with digital cartography, are only a minimal fraction of all the PSI that

could and should be opened to increase transparency, reduce the costs of Government

and stimulate the economy. In all these other cases:

● the money to generate the data already arrives by some other source than sales

and licensing(but even with those data it may be possible to generate them by

crowdsourcing, thereby reducing those costs!)

● the only extra expense caused by publishing those data online (assuming they're

already available in some digital format, of course!), would be the hosting and

bandwidth costs, that may be greatly reduced by mirroring and other technical

solutions like torrents, already widely used to distribute Free/Open Source

Software (FOSS) through the Internet.

3.6.2. Real impact of data manipulation or misunderstanding

TITLE OF YOUR PAPER (for professional papers) 28

The fix for the risk that data is manipulated is to not only open government data and

procedures, but to simplify the latter (which eventually also greatly reduces cost) as

much as possible. Abundance of occasions to secretly play with data and how they are

managed is a symptom of excessive, or peak complexity: again, pro

Your Name (First M. Last)

Name of School or Institution

Course Number and Name (for student papers)

Instructor (for student papers)

Date (for student papers)

Author Note (for professional papers)

First paragraph: Author ORCID iDs (if any)

Second paragraph: Changes in affiliation (if any)

Third paragraph: Disclosures and Acknowledgments

Fourth paragraph: Contact information (mailing address and e-mail)

Indent the first line of each paragraph.

TITLE OF YOUR PAPER (for professional papers) 29

Abstract (for professional papers)

One paragraph, not indented. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit,

sed diam nonummy nibh euismod tincidunt ut laoreet dolore magna aliquam erat

volutpat. Ut wisi enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exerci tation ullamcorper suscipit

lobortis nisl ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis autem vel eum iriure dolor in

hendrerit in vulputate velit esse molestie consequat, vel illum dolore eu feugiat nulla

facilisis at vero eros et accumsan.

Keywords: First line indented, lorem, ipsum, dolor

TITLE OF YOUR PAPER (for professional papers) 30

Full Title of Your Paper

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy

nibh euismod tincidunt ut laoreet dolore magna aliquam erat volutpat (Lorem, 20XX).

Duis autem vel eum iriure dolor in hendrerit in vulputate velit esse molestie consequat,

vel illum dolore eu feugiat nulla facilisis at vero eros et accumsan.

Method (Heading Level 1)

Participants (Heading Level 2)

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy

nibh euismod tincidunt ut laoreet dolore magna aliquam erat volutpat. Duis autem vel

eum iriure dolor in hendrerit in vulputate velit esse molestie consequat, vel illum dolore

eu feugiat nulla facilisis at vero eros et accumsan.

Assessments and Measures

Ut blandit malesuada quam, ac varius tortor gravida eget. Vestibulum id ligula

leo, ut accumsan mi. Sed tristique euismod convallis. Nulla facilisi. Etiam vestibulum est

id orci interdum vitae porta enim blandit. Cras sit amet arcu dolor, at venenatis erat.

Vestibulum accumsan placerat mauris. Morbi nec nibh nibh. Duis ultricies posuere

nunc. Morbi at tellus quis magna vestibulum eleifend.

Heading Level 3

Maecenas ullamcorper bibendum consequat. Pellentesque ultrices, eros eu

tincidunt pretium, magna leo volutpat libero, non bibendum diam nunc eget urna.

Vivamus eu tortor et dui aliquam vestibulum at vel augue. Vivamus elit dui, porttitor eget

egestas at, rhoncus in justo. Curabitur tristique, elit ac venenatis volutpat, eros mauris

iaculis diam, vitae rhoncus erat metus vitae eros.

TITLE OF YOUR PAPER (for professional papers) 31

Heading level 4 is inline with the following paragraph, separated by a

period. Nulla congue egestas ante, id ultricies orci dignissim commodo. Fusce placerat,

libero eu pharetra pulvinar, lorem dui pulvinar nisi, et semper orci orci vitae magna.

Nullam sodales, felis id feugiat scelerisque, tortor nulla interdum mauris, ac porttitor

odio dolor eget eros.

Second level 4 heading. Duis sit amet ipsum pretium erat accumsan iaculis

vitae eget risus. Donec ut dui in lorem volutpat fermentum bibendum pulvinar libero.

Nunc imperdiet eros et mi posuere pellentesque. Donec tincidunt ipsum eget nisl

ullamcorper eu placerat libero ullamcorper. Maecenas id luctus ligula. Cras

condimentum eleifend nibh sit amet iaculis. Suspendisse placerat sollicitudin mi, vel

ornare augue hendrerit ac. Nulla sed suscipit sapien. Cras pellentesque orci lectus, eu

consequat enim.

Heading level 5 is also inline. Nulla congue egestas ante, id ultricies orci

dignissim commodo. Fusce placerat, libero eu pharetra pulvinar, lorem dui pulvinar nisi,

et semper orci orci vitae magna. Nullam sodales, felis id feugiat scelerisque, tortor nulla

interdum mauris, ac porttitor odio dolor eget eros.

Second level 5 heading. Duis sit amet ipsum pretium erat accumsan iaculis

vitae eget risus. Donec ut dui in lorem volutpat fermentum bibendum pulvinar libero.

Nunc imperdiet eros et mi posuere pellentesque. Donec tincidunt ipsum eget nisl

ullamcorper eu placerat libero ullamcorper. Maecenas id luctus ligula. Cras

condimentum eleifend nibh sit amet iaculis. Suspendisse placerat sollicitudin mi, vel

ornare augue hendrerit ac. Nulla sed suscipit sapien. Cras pellentesque orci lectus, eu

consequat enim.
TITLE OF YOUR PAPER (for professional papers) 32

Results

Maecenas id luctus ligula. Cras condimentum eleifend nibh sit amet iaculis.

Suspendisse placerat sollicitudin mi, vel ornare augue hendrerit ac. Nulla sed suscipit

sapien. Cras pellentesque orci lectus, eu consequat enim.

Outcome 1

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy

nibh euismod tincidunt ut laoreet dolore magna aliquam erat volutpat.

Outcome 2

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy

nibh euismod tincidunt ut laoreet dolore magna aliquam erat volutpat.

Discussion

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy

nibh euismod tincidunt ut laoreet dolore magna aliquam erat volutpat. Duis autem vel

eum iriure dolor in hendrerit in vulputate velit esse molestie consequat, vel illum dolore

eu feugiat nulla facilisis at vero eros et accumsan.

TITLE OF YOUR PAPER (for professional papers) 33

References

Lastname, C. (2008). Title of the source without caps except Proper Nouns or: First

word after colon. The Journal or Publication Italicized and Capped, Vol#(Issue#),

Page numbers.

Lastname, O. (2010). Online journal using DOI (digital object identifier). Main Online

Journal Name, Vol#(Issue#), 159-192. https://doi.org/10.1000/182

Lastname, W. (2009). Title of webpage. Site Name. Retrieved July 3, 2019, from

http://www.example.com