Managing The Lead-Time Frontier: Part Two - Chapter 5
Managing The Lead-Time Frontier: Part Two - Chapter 5
Competing on time is the principle of taking timely completion of supply chain tasks to a higher level: that of
compressing cycle times for supply chain operations for internal and external benefits.
External benefits include:
lowering overall cycle time and providing faster services;
outrunning competition.
Internal benefits include:
shorter cash-to-cash cycles, thereby releasing working capital, improving liquidity and reducing asset intensity of the supply
chain (as discussed in detail in Chapter 3);
lowering inventories in the supply chain by speeding up turnover times for work in progress and inventory.
The trade-off between cost and quality can be altered by preventing defects from happening in the first place
through such measures as:
designing the process so that defects cannot occur (error proofing);
designing products so that they are easy to make and distribute;
training personnel so that they understand the process and its limitations.
Relationships that need to be understood and harnessed include recognising that:
costs do not have to increase in order to improve quality – they can reduce;
costs do not have to increase when lead times are reduced. It may be possible to reduce both in some processes by reducing
waste in terms of unnecessary transportation or inventory, for example (refer to Chapter 7 for a detailed account of wastes);
costs do not have to go up as product variety increases and times reduce – they can also reduce.
“A system is complex when it is difficult to formulate its overall behaviour, even when given almost complete
information about its components and their relationships” (Edmunds, 1999)
Two types of variety
External variety: the choice offered to the end-customer, or potential finished product SKUs. Example from automotive:
2 body styles * 15 power train combinations * 19 painted body colours * 15 trim colours * 70 factory fitted options = 5 600,000 variations
Internal variety: converts external variety into the internal requirements placed onto the supply chain.
Holweg and Pil (2004) measured internal variety at three levels in the product structure: the basic product (models and body
styles), intermediate (such as power trains, wiring harnesses and body colours), and peripheral (number and variety of
components used).
Cooper and Griffiths (1994) state that ‘issues of variety and complexity are strongly linked’, and list three rules for
managing complexity:
Increased variety tends to add to the complexity of logistics operations, and so increases both direct and indirect costs.
Variety should be increased only when it contributes to added value. Heineken, the Dutch beer manufacturer, reduced SKUs
from 2,500 across Europe to SKUs in their 10s. The ‘right’ level of product variety starts with consumer research (Mahler and
Bahulkar, 2009) rather than ‘tail cutting’ (Activity 2.1).
System redesign can enhance added value through reducing the cost impact of an increase in variety. The antidote to
complexity is simplicity, so auto manufacturers have implemented several ways to offer external variety without making
internal operations too complex.
Time-based initiatives
First focus: shorter cycle times and faster inventory turns
Positive “side effect”: Lower overhead costs and costs of dealing with breakdowns and delays
Increased responsiveness to customer needs – many elements of customer service are dependent upon time,
e.g. how long it takes to deliver a product or service, achieving on-time delivery and how long it takes to deal
with customer queries, estimates and complaints
Managing increased variety - reducing overall lead time, product complexity and process set-up times, the
production of a particular product can be scheduled more frequently with smaller production batches
Increased product innovation - shortening of product development lead time means that innovations can be
capitalised on to maximum effect
Reducing the need for working capital - Increasing the speed of flow through processes by eliminating
unnecessary steps and wasted time, reduces the amount of money tied up in the system
Reducing the need for plant and equipment capital - If the equipment can no longer be used to generate
revenue, all it does is incur further costs, such as maintenance, and the floor space it occupies will have many
better uses
Reducing development costs - Shortened lead times in product development are achieved in part by more
effective use of development resources through elimination of rework and reduction of distracting superfluous
projects
Reducing quality costs - One of the main elements in improving quality is to reduce the time between an error
being made and the problem being detected
Assess the benefits and concerns that may arise as a result of the relative sizes of P-time and
D-time. Compile your views in the table.
1 2
3 4
5 6
In groups of five
9. Select one process of your company and create a time-based process
map (use public sources an estimates for the times involved).
Duration: 40 minutes
Marketing - ask the customer to cooperate by supplying more detailed demand information at an earlier stage,
e.g. by locating one of your people in the customer’s scheduling process
Product development - with time-based thinking in mind, next-generation products can be designed for ‘time
to market’
Process improvement - engineer processes to eliminate unnecessary steps, and take wasted time out of those
that remain
When? Time-based competition is only as relevant as the customer perceives it to be. Speed for the sake of
speed can create unnecessary costs, and can cut corners, leading to poor quality.
Where? D-times are a measure of the importance of speed as a competitive factor, whilst P-times measure the
ability to deliver. The integration of the two measures the point at which the customer order penetrates the
supply chain.
How? The more predictable and lower-priority products and components can be delivered from inventory with
less priority given to speed. Shipments of customised products can be assembled from stocks of standard
components and modules within the D-time demanded.
A manufacturing planning and control (MPC) system is to meet customer requirements by enabling managers to
make the right decisions
Three time horizons are involved for source, make, deliver processes:
Long term - decisions about capacity provision; strategic in nature (e.g., how much capacity is needed, when and of what
type); year based
Medium term - match supply and demand; month based
Short term - meet day-to-day demand as it unfolds; day based
Demand management
Resource planning
Sales and operations planning (S&OP)
Master production scheduling (MPS)
Material and capacity planning (engine
room)
MPC execution systems (back end)
Wilson formula
2𝑧𝑧𝐶𝐶𝑠𝑠 /𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐
The trade-off this time is between the
cost of placing an order and inventory
carrying cost, where
Cost of placing an order: All order-related
costs, including purchase department costs,
transportation costs from the supplier, and
goods-in inspection and receiving.
Relatively sophisticated modelling data are needed to enable accurate and timely planning and control of
logistics in a focal firm
The greater the product variety, the more component parts and the greater the number of levels in the BOM,
the more challenging the task.
Challenges resulting from differenced between the partners
Differences in process technology - e.g. a supplier of aluminium cans to a soft drinks manufacturer is positioned between
producers of aluminium rolled sheet, and high speed canning lines
Differences in working routines - shift patterns, conditions of employment, holidays and shut-downs are but a few of the
possible differences in working routines between partners in a supply chain
Priority planning - whilst an order for a major customer may be priority number 1 for the focal firm, the existence of the
order may not be visible to upstream partners
Inadequacies in MPC systems design - e.g. impossibility to change from MTS to MTO due to long MPR planning intervals
In groups of five
10. Depict the basic process of your product through the supply chain
and state, where the push/ pull boundary (also: cutomer order
decoupling point) should be. Justify your decision.
Duration: 20 minutes
The Roles of Distributor in the Supply Chain – Push-pull Boundary | Semantic Scholar
Factor 1 Factor 6
full capability for just-in-time supply the levels of work in progress and other types of inventory
Factor 2 have a significant impact upon the visibility of a process.
delay and inventory interact with each other in a system of
positive amplification
Factor 3
defects lead to delays
the likelihood of defects leads to safety stocks
Factor 4
unplanned downtime, planned maintenance, changeover
times
Factor 5
visible flow through a process enables a better
understanding of people´s work and how they themselves
The pyramid of key factors that underpin JIT
affect others
Four collaborative approaches to improve supply coordination, which originated in retail supply chains:
Efficient consumer response (ECR) that has been targeted primarily in food and fast-moving categories in the grocery
sector.
Collaborative planning, forecasting and replenishment (CPFR) that is also used predominantly by manufacturers and
retailers in the grocery sector, although other sectors where there is a broad range of SKUs subject to volatile demand also
use this approach.
Vendor-managed inventory (VMI) is used for retail inventory but, equally, is applied to inbound supplies for manufacturers
in industrial supply chains
Quick response (QR) has been targeted primarily at non-food categories.
Benefits of electronic collaboration Process completion in quick timescale, at lower total cost
Improved availability of products to consumer, more sales All trading partners become more committed to the shared
Total service is improved, total costs are reduced (including plans and objectives. Changes are made with more care,
inventory, waste, and resources), and reduced capacities by and are immediately visible to all.
reduced uncertainty
Inter-company processes become far more integrated and
hence simple, standard, speedy and certain
Quicker, more structured, and transparent communication
of information across the supply chain to all authorised
users
audit trail can be provided to say when information was
amended
Email prompts can update users of variance and progress,
and can confirm authorisations
System data use for monitoring and evaluation purposes
“Quick response (QR) is an approach to meeting customer demand by supplying the right quantity, variety, and
quality at the right time to the right place at the right price.”
This concept originated in the US textile and apparel industry in response to the threat posed by overseas
competitors
The concepts behind QR are based on taking a total supply chain view of an industry and identify opportunities
for improvement
involves mapping the processes needed to convert raw material into the final product
performance of the process is also assessed to determine its effectiveness
Role of enabling technologies
Uniform product codes
Electronic data interchange (EDI)
In groups of five
11. Would a vendor managed inventory be favorable in your case?
Which are the advantages and disadvantages involved?
Duration: 20 minutes
The Roles of Distributor in the Supply Chain – Push-pull Boundary | Semantic Scholar
How is material flow planned and controlled in the supply chain? (continued)
Coordinating material planning and control between firms greatly increases the need for
management of detail. There are many more ways to inhibit the accurate exchange of
data than within a focal firm. This results in undesirable symptoms like the bullwhip
effect and even chaotic behaviour of material movements.
What is JIT, and how does it apply to logistics?
JIT is a broad-based philosophy of doing the simple things right and gradually doing
them better. As applied to logistics, JIT can be conceived as a pyramid of key factors that
centre on minimum delay and minimum inventory.
‘How many’ and ‘when’ to order replenishment quantities are key questions that impact
on throughput times and inventories. JIT addresses these questions by attacking the
sources and causes of waste. Examples are reduction of changeover times and simple,
paperless systems of material control based on the principle of pull scheduling.
Comparing MRP and JIT: JIT pull scheduling works best for control; MRP for planning.