Scribd
Upload
34 views1 page

Oral Presentations Marking Scheme

The document provides a rubric for evaluating oral presentations across 5 criteria: attitude, grammar and pronunciation, organization, subject knowledge and content, and argumentation. Each criteria is rated on a scale from 1-4, with 4 being the highest score, to assess elements like eye contact, use of notes, respecting time limits, grammar mistakes, logical organization, depth of knowledge, and ability to argue or justify positions.

Uploaded by

Daouda Thiam
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
34 views1 page

Oral Presentations Marking Scheme

The document provides a rubric for evaluating oral presentations across 5 criteria: attitude, grammar and pronunciation, organization, subject knowledge and content, and argumentation. Each criteria is rated on a scale from 1-4, with 4 being the highest score, to assess elements like eye contact, use of notes, respecting time limits, grammar mistakes, logical organization, depth of knowledge, and ability to argue or justify positions.

Uploaded by

Daouda Thiam
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

O RAL PRESEN TATIO N S

  0/1 2 3 4

Speaks too quietly. Low-medium voice. Uses a clear voice but fails at Uses a clear voice, speaks in a lively
No eye contact is Occasional eye contact. maintaining eye contact or manner, maintains eye contact with
1) Attitude
maintained. Too hesitant. speaking in a lively manner. the class.
Notes are used. No notes are used. No notes are used. No notes are used.
No respect of the time limit. Respects the time limit. Respects the time limit. Respects the time limit.

2) Grammar and Many grammatical and Basic syntax, approximate Few mistakes, vocabulary is Clear pronunciation, authentic accent
phonological mistakes, vocabulary, some grammar rather precise, good with hardly any mistakes, elaborate
pronunciation
barbarisms, French and/or phonological mistakes. pronunciation. vocabulary.
pronunciation.

No logical sequence of Information is not logically Information is presented in a Information is presented in a logical
3) Organization information, the organized. Many repetitions. logical sequence. No sequence with an introduction and a
presentation is difficult to introduction or conclusion is conclusion.
follow. made.

4) Subject
Little knowledge or clear Some information is provided Good quality of the Student demonstrates full knowledge
understanding of the topic. but remains too superficial or information and knowledge of and gives a very detailed account of
knowledge and Very little information is is at times inaccurate. the subject. the topic.
provided or is inaccurate.
content

The content is too Little argumentation is The subject has been rather The student is able to justify his choice
5) Argumentation descriptive, no justification provided well argumented. of subject, its relevance and defends
or argumentation is his/her point of view.
provided.

You might also like